Top Banner
46

Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

Nathan Jacobs
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 2: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 3: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Philosophy 103Linguistics 103

Yet, still, Even further More and yet more

Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking

Dr. Robert Barnard

Page 4: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Last Time:

• Introduction to Categorical Logic• Aristotle’s Categories• Leibniz, Concepts, and Identity• Analytic – Synthetic Distinction• Essence and Accident• Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

Page 5: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Plan for Today• Categorical Propositions– Parts and Characteristics– Conditional and Conjunctive Equivalents– Existential Import

Page 6: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Reminder !!!!!Thursday, September 13, 2007 4:00 PMBryant 209

Philosophy Forum Talk –

“Einstein on the Role of History and Philosophy of Science in Physics”

Dr. Don Howard – University of Notre Dame

Extra Credit: 1 page reaction, due in 2 weeks (9/27)

Page 7: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Categorical Propositions

Categorical Propositions relate one category (in whole or part) as indicated by the SUBJECT TERM to another category, indicated by the PREDICATE TERM (either affirmatively or negatively):

• All houses have roofs• Some buildings are houses• No eggs are shatterproof• Some people are not paying attention

Page 8: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

UNIVERSAL CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

A Categorical Proposition that makes a claim about the entire SUBJECT CLASS is called a UNIVERSAL CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION

• All Toys…• No Fish…• All Bugs…• No people from Georgia…

Page 9: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

PARTICULAR CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

A Categorical Proposition that makes a claim about one or more members of the SUBJECT CLASS is called a PARTICULAR CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION

• Some Eggs…• Some men…• Some Lithuanians…

Page 10: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

QUANTITY

All categorical propositions are either:

UNIVERSAL or PARTICULAR

We call this the QUANTITY of the proposition.

Page 11: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATIVE PROPOSITIONS

When a categorical proposition asserts the existence of a relationship between the Subject term and the Predicate term we say that the proposition is AFFIRMATIVE.

When a categorical proposition denies the relationship between the Subject term and the Predicate term we say that the proposition is NEGATIVE

Page 12: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

QUALITY

All categorical propositions are either:

AFFIRMATIVE or NEGATIVE

We call this the QUALITY of the proposition.

Page 13: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

THE 4 TYPES of CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION

UNIVERSAL PARTICULAR

AFFIRMATIVE ALL S is P SOME S is P

NEGATIVE NO S is P SOME S is not P

Page 14: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Questions?

Page 15: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

THE UNIVERSAL AFFIRMATIVE

ALL S is P

TYPE A

If (x is S) then (x is P)

Conceptual Claim

Page 16: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

THE UNIVERSAL NEGATIVE

No S is P

TYPE E

If (x is S) then (x is not P)

Conceptual Claim

Page 17: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

PROPOSITIONS ABOUT INDIVIDUALSIn CATEGORICAL LOGIC a proper name denotes a class with

one member.• Socrates: the class containing Socrates• Al Gore: the class of Al Gore• Brad Pitt: The class containing Brad Pitt• …etc…

SO, a proposition like ‘Socrates is a man’ is really about the whole class Socrates, so…

It is a UNIVERSAL proposition!!!

Page 18: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Universal Propositions

1. All Dogs are Brown2. All Houses are residences3. No Pigs have wings4. No Cars are Airships5. No Humans have quills6. All Wisdom is not Folly7. John Jay was the first Chief Justice

Page 19: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

THE PARTICULAR AFFIRMATIVE

Some S is P

TYPE I

At least one thing X is Both S and P

For at least one x (x is S) and (x is P)

Existential Claim

Page 20: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

THE PARTICULAR NEGATIVE

Some S is not P

TYPE O

At least one thing X is S and not P

For at least one x (x is S) and (x is not P)

Existential Claim

Page 21: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Particular Propositions

1. Some Cats are red.2. Some Pigs are not Sows3. Some lettuce is not endive.4. Some Men are not Women5. Some Flowers are plants.6. Some Presidents of the United States served

two terms7. Some Ole Miss coaches used to win games.

Page 22: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

EXISTENTIAL IMPORT

ONLY a proposition with EXISTENTIAL IMPORT requires that there be an instance of the SUBJECT TERM in reality for the proposition to be true.

• All Dogs have 4 Legs (Conceptual – no EI)• Some Fish are Red (Existential – EI)

Page 23: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

QUANTIFIER AND QUALIFIER

The Term which determines the QUANTITY of the proposition is called THE QUANTIFIER

ALL – NO -- SOMEThe term that determines the QUALITY of the

proposition is called the QUALIFIER

ALL – NO – IS – IS NOT

Page 24: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

A, E, I, and OTERM Proposition Form Quantity Quality

A ALL S IS P UNIVERSAL AFFIRMATIVE

E NO S IS P UNIVERSAL NEGATIVE

I SOME S IS P PARTICULAR AFFIRMATIVE

O SOME S IS NOT P PARTICULAR NEGATIVE

Page 25: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

COPULATION!!!!Every Categorical Proposition has a Quantity and

Quality, a Subject term and a Predicate Term. There is one more part:

THE COPULA

All S is PNo S is P

Some S is PSome S is not P

Page 26: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Questions?

Page 27: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 28: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 29: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 30: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Questions?

Page 31: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 32: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 33: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 34: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 35: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 36: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Page 37: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Categorical Propositions• Conditional and Conjunctive equivalents• Existential Import• Traditional Square of Opposition• Modern Square of Opposition• Existential Fallacy• Venn Diagrams for Propositions

Page 38: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week-

• Immediate Inferences• Conversion• Contraposition• Obversion

Page 39: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week-

• Syllogistic Logic• Form- Mood- Figure• Medieval Logic• Venn Diagrams for Syllogisms (Modern)

Page 40: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Venn Diagrams for Syllogisms (traditional)• Limits of Syllogistic Logic• Review of Counter-Example Method

Page 41: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Logic of Propositions• Decision Problem for Propositional Logic• Symbolization and Definition• Translation Basics

Page 42: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Truth Tables for Propositions• Tautology• Contingency• Self-Contradiction

Page 43: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Truth Tables for Propositions II• Consistency• Inconsistency• Equivalence

Page 44: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Truth Table for Arguments• Validity / Invalidity• Soundness

Page 45: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Indirect Truth Tables• Formal Construction of Counter-Examples

Page 46: Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.

Week -

• Logical Truths• Necessity • Possibility• Impossibility