This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1. Phil 10 Introduction to Philosophy Kant
2. Mid-term As stated on the syllabus you will be able to
correct your own exam for credit. Instead of one or two sentences I
expect a paragraph typed for each question. Turned in NO LATER than
Tuesday October16th. Thats 5 days!
3. Mid-term questions What is the structure of the republic
that Plato suggests in The Republic? Merchant class,
warrior/soldier class, Philosopher Kings What is the problem with
his proof for the existence of God? We can clearly and distinctly
thing which do not exist. Example: Perfect Circles, irrational
numbers etc. The Greeks became critical of myth as explanation, why
and how is this related to the idea of the Truth? What kind of
explanation did they want instead of myth? They wanted Naturalistic
explanations
4. Extra Credit Philosophy Center (sign in and shoot me an
email letting me know) Location: FOB 231 Hours: T-W 11-4
Presentations Shoot me an email letting me know your interested 2-5
min To Kill a Mocking Bird bring a ticket stub Wednesday 7 Thursday
7 Friday 7 Saturday 7 Give a free-form response to the play 1 page
Have you encountered racism? Do you think racism still exist? Even
if race does not exist scientifically, does the societal conception
of it still effect society?
5. Rationalism Empiricism Immanuel Kant (17241804)
6. Was a follower of Liebniz Read Hume and was woken from his
dogmatic slumber Categories the mind structures reality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Z8jAs0utwxo
7. Immanuel Kant (17241804) He synthesized early modern
rationalism and empiricism and addressed the crisis of the
enlightenment. The Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787) The
Critique of Practical Reason (1788) The Critique of the Power of
Judgment (1790)
8. Kants Epistemology He argues that the human understanding is
the source of the general laws of nature that structure all our
experience Human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our
basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality.
9. Kants Epistemology Scientific knowledge, morality, and
religious belief are mutually consistent and secure because they
all rest on the same foundation of human autonomy
10. Kants Epistemology Human autonomy is also the final end of
nature according to the teleological worldview of reflecting
judgment that Kant introduces to unify the theoretical and
practical parts of his philosophical system.
11. Kants Epistemology The Critique of Pure Reason Kant defines
metaphysics in terms of the cognitions after which reason might
strive independently of all experience, and his goal in the book is
to reach a decision about the possibility or impossibility of a
metaphysics in general, and the determination of its sources, as
well as its extent and boundaries, all, however, from principles
(Axii. See also Bxiv; and 4:255 257).
12. Kants Epistemology Kant wrote the Critique toward the end
of the Enlightenment, which was then in a state of crisis.
Enlightenment (Newton) was optimistic about reason traditional
authorities were increasingly questioned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =MKXszzCp2_U
13. Kants Epistemology For why should we need political or
religious authorities to tell us how to live or what to believe, if
each of us has the capacity to figure these things out for
ourselves?
14. Kants Epistemology . The Enlightenment commitment to the
sovereignty of reason was tied to the expectation that it would not
lead to any of these consequences but instead would support certain
key beliefs that tradition had always sanctioned.
15. Kants Epistemology Physics (Newton) taken as ideal
Determinism If nature is entirely governed by mechanistic, causal
laws, then it may seem that there is no room for freedom, a soul,
or anything but matter in motion. This threatened the traditional
view that morality requires freedom.
16. Kants Epistemology Threatened to undermine traditional
moral and religious beliefs that free rational thought was expected
to support. This was the main intellectual crisis of the
Enlightenment.
17. Kants Epistemology The Critique of Pure Reason is Kants
response to this crisis.
18. Kants Epistemology Kants Main Goal: To show that a critique
of reason by reason itself, unaided and unrestrained by traditional
authorities, establishes a secure and consistent basis for both
Newtonian science and traditional morality and religion. In other
words, free rational inquiry adequately supports all of these
essential human interests and shows them to be mutually consistent.
So reason deserves the sovereignty attributed to it by the
Enlightenment.
19. Kants Epistemology Phenomena vs Noumina noumenon, plural
Noumena: the thing- in-itself (das Ding an sich) as opposed to what
Kant called the phenomenonthe thing as it appears to an observer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Sz6qunm6q30
20. Kants Epistemology Kant now recognizes the Power of reason
as well as its Limitations A Priori A Posteriori Analytic
Synthetic
21. Kants Epistemology Analytic sentences, such as
Ophthalmologists are doctors, are those whose truth seems to be
knowable by knowing the meanings of the constituent words alone.
all bachelors are unmarried men
22. Kants Epistemology synthetic ones, such as Ophthalmologists
are ill-humored, whose truth is knowable by both knowing the
meaning of the words and something about the world.
23. Kants Epistemology A priori knowledge is knowledge that
rests on a priori justification. A priori justification is a type
of epistemic justification that is, in some sense, independent of
experience.
24. Kants Epistemology a posteriori knowledge or justification
is dependent on experience or empirical evidence (for example "Some
bachelors are very happy"). A posteriori justification makes
reference to experience; but the issue concerns how one knows the
proposition or claim in questionwhat justifies or grounds ones
belief in it.
25. Kants Epistemology Our mind has categories Examples: space,
time (forms of intuition), relation, cause and effect These
categories constrain our experience Thus we experience Phenomena
(constrained experience) rather than Noumena (thing-in-itself). We
constitute the objects of experience
26. Kants Epistemology Kants idealism: The view that the world
is constituted by our ideas was a radical view of knowledge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =7M-cmNdiFuI
27. Kants Deontology Kants morality The word deontology derives
from the Greek words for duty (deon) and science (or study) of
(logos).
28. Kants Deontology http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=79hOZdh4PkQ stand in opposition to consequentialists.
29. Kants Deontology deontology falls within the domain of
moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought
to do (deontic theories), in contrast to (aretaic [virtue]
theories) that fundamentally, at least guide and assess what kind
of person (in terms of character traits) we are and should be.
30. Kants Deontology Consequentialists hold that choices acts
and/or intentions are to be morally assessed solely by the states
of affairs they bring about.
31. Kants Deontology However much consequentialists differ
about what the Good consists in, they all agree that the morally
right choices are those that increase the Good. Moreover,
consequentialists generally agree that the Good is
agent-neutral.
32. Kants Deontology Consequentialism -criticized for what it
seemingly permits and requires. It seemingly may demand (and thus,
of course, permit) that innocents be killed, beaten, lied to, or
deprived of material goods to produce greater benefits for
others.
33. Kants Deontology Consequences and only consequences can
conceivably justify any kind of act, no matter how harmful it is to
some.
34. Kants Deontology deontological theories judge the morality
of choices by criteria different than the states of affairs those
choices bring about. Roughly speaking, deontologists of all stripes
hold that some choices cannot be justified by their effects that no
matter how morally good their consequences, some choices are
morally forbidden.
35. Kants Deontology For deontologists, what makes a choice
right is its conformity with a moral norm.
36. Kants Deontology The way in which Kant organizes his
argument is supposed to lead any rational being towards the
Categorical Imperative. He does this through a series of steps;
from good will to duty, duty to law, and finally from law to
universal law
37. Kants Deontology Good Will: essential to the Kantian
framework - is good without qualification. For example
understanding, happiness, and moderation can in some lights look to
be intrinsically good, yet we find that if there is an ill will
involved, then they can be turned into negatives
38. Kants Deontology Duty: . Good will is always enticed to
come away from its duty by physical pleasures or a vast number of
other temptations
39. Kants Deontology Good will Duty Law: The third proposition,
which follow from the other two, can be expressed thus: Duty is the
necessity of an action done out of respect from the law (Kant
13).
40. Kants Deontology Since I have deprived the will of every
impulse that might arise for it from obeying any particular law,
there is nothing left to serve the will as principle except the
universal conformity of its actions to law as such (14). The above
paragraph outlines the path that Kant believes will lead every
rational man to Universal Law which is the basis for his
Categorical Imperative.
41. Categorical Imperative The Categorical Imperative has three
main formulations and two sub-formulations. the Formula of
Universal Law Formula for the Law of Nature the Formulation of
Humanity Formula of Autonomy Formulation of the Kingdom of
Ends
42. Categorical Imperative the Formula of Universal Law which
states: act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the
same time will that it should become a universal law (Kant
30).
43. Categorical Imperative the Formula for the Law of Nature,
which goes thusly: act as if the maxim of your actions were to
become through your will a universal law of nature (Kant 30).
44. Categorical Imperative Formulation of Humanity is: Act in
such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or
in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and
never simply as a means (Kant 36).
45. Categorical Imperative Formula of Autonomy and states: The
idea of the will of every rational being as a will that legislates
universal law. According to this principle all maxims are rejected
which are not consistent with the wills own legislation of
universal law (Kant 38).
46. Categorical Imperative Formulation of the Kingdom of Ends
which says: Every being must so act as if he were through his maxim
always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends (Kant
43).
47. Terms to know (see last lecture also) A priori Categorical
imperative A posteriori Formula of Universal Law Analytic Synthetic
Formula for the Law of Deontology Nature Formulation of Humanity
Consequentialism Formula of Autonomy Phenomena Formulation of the
Noumenon Kingdom of Ends