Top Banner
Performance comparison of Performance comparison of MIPv4 and MIPv6 MIPv4 and MIPv6 Presented by: Md. Habibur Rahman (11-94853-2) Course: Mobile and Multimedia Network Instructor: Md. Manirul Islam
14
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Performance comparison of Performance comparison of MIPv4 and MIPv6 MIPv4 and MIPv6

Presented by:

Md. Habibur Rahman (11-94853-2)Course:

Mobile and Multimedia NetworkInstructor:

Md. Manirul Islam

Page 2: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Introduction Mobile IP

• MIPv4

• MIPv6 Simulation Environment Performance Metrics Simulation Result Conclusion

AgendaAgenda

Page 3: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Foreign Agent (FA)

Home Agent (HA)

Corresponded Node (CN)

Mobile Node (MN)

Binding Update Data Transmission

Home Network

Foreign Network

Mobile IPv4 (MIP)Mobile IPv4 (MIP)

Page 4: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)

AccessRouter (AR)

Home Agent (HA)

Corresponded Node (CN)

Mobile Node (MN)

Binding Update Data Transmission

Home Network

Foreign Network

Page 5: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

MIPv4 • integrated in NS2

MIPv6 • MobiWAN Patch (ns-allinone-2.33)

• Patch Link:• http://www.nicta.com.au/people/

mehanio/nsmisc

Implementation of MIPImplementation of MIP

Page 6: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Network Simulator –NS2 Simulation Area 1200X1200 Simulation Time -200sec MAC/80211 Channel type - Channel/Wireless

channel Two Radio propagation model Data Packet - TCP

Simulation EnvironmentSimulation Environment

Page 7: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Simulation ParametersSimulation ParametersParameters Values

Simulation area 1200 X 1200

Mobile Host (MN) 1

Mobile IP MIPv4, MIPv6

Address Type Hierarchical

Traffic type TCP

Packet size 1040 bytes

Simulation time 200s

IEEE MAC Layer 802.11

Protocols DSDV

Network interface type Phy/wirelessphy

Page 8: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Simulation TopologySimulation Topology

Page 9: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6
Page 10: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6
Page 11: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Drop• Packet drop is equal to number of packets

sent from source minus number of packet received in the path of destination i.e.

Throughput• Measurement of number of packets

passing through the network in a unit of time.

Performance MetricPerformance Metric

Page 12: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Packet Type (Simulation Time 200 Sec)

Mobile IP Total Sent packets

Total Received packets

Total dropped packets

TCP MIPv4 1300 1297 3

Mipv6 29692 29692 0

Result AnalysisResult Analysis

Packet Type (Simulation Time 200 Sec)

Mobile IP Total Sending Throughput (kbps)

Total Receiving Throughput (kbps)

TCP MIPv4 131220000 129700000

Mipv6 2147483647 2147483647

Throughput Calculation

Packet Drop Calculation

Page 13: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Simulate MIPv4 and MIPv6 in NS2 Performance compare by two metrics Require more performance analysis According to our discussion, MIPv6

performs better than MIPv4

ConclusionConclusion

Page 14: Performace  analysis of mipv4 vs mipv6

Thank you