Top Banner
OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods A General Overview and Comparison between European and United States Approaches Olivier Sacroug European Patent Attorney Katzarov SA
36

OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Sierra Morales
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based

Business MethodsA General Overview and Comparison

between European and United States Approaches

Olivier Sacroug

European Patent AttorneyKatzarov SA

Page 2: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Software Protection: Copyright or Patent?– Copyright : automatic and free protection of a

literary work.– Patent : protects a function, independently of

the grammatical construction of the lines of code.

Page 3: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Copyright– Advantages:

• Free• No disclosure of the source code required

– Disadvantages:• No real protection of the function

Page 4: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Patents– Advantages:

• Protects the idea behind the software

– Disadvantages:• Favours big corporations (?)• Inhibits competition and innovation (?)

Page 5: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Copyright– Protects against piracy

• Patent– Protects against imitation

Page 6: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Is Software patentable in Europe (EPC)?

NO!

Page 7: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Are Software Inventions patentablein Europe (EPC)?

Yes, if…

Page 8: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Article 52(1) EPC– European patents are granted for inventions

that :• are new• involve an inventive step• are susceptible of industrial application

Page 9: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Article 52(2) EPC– “programs for computers” are not to be

regarded as “inventions” (because they lack a technical character)

Page 10: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Article 52(3) EPC– exceptions listed in Article 52(2) have to be

interpreted narrowly

Page 11: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Interpretation of the Boards of Appeal– computer-implemented inventions can be

patented if they involve an inventive technical contribution to the prior art

Page 12: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Computer-implemented Inventions– Any invention the performance of which

involves the use of a computer, computer network or other programmable apparatus and having one or more features which are realised wholly or partly by means of one or several computer programs.

Page 13: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• 4 types of Computer-implemented Inventions– Technical processes describable without

computer/software features.– Problem can not be solved completely without

computer implementation.– Solution exclusively in the area of software.– Invention is a computer implementation of a non-

technical process.

Page 14: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• T 208/84 & T26/86– a software for controlling or carrying-out a

technical process is patentable

Page 15: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• T 1173/97 & T935/97– computer programs stored on a data carrier

are patentable if there is a “further technical effect” (i.e., one going beyond the normal physical effect)

Page 16: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• T 258/03– a patent can not be granted if there is no

technical contribution to the prior art

Page 17: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Non-patentable computer-implemented inventions– Internet retailing method– fixed-odds betting system (EP 1 139 245)– business methods

Page 18: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Patentable computer-implemented invention– an invention enabling the detection of the

proper functioning of an ABS control unit(EP 771 280)

– computer-controlled process for operating a robot arm

Page 19: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Patentable computer-implemented invention– computer-controlled process for enhancing a

graphic display– computer-controlled process for controlling

data storage between memories– computer-controlled process for routing

diverse calls through a telephone exchange

Page 20: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Are Business Methods patentablein Europe (EPC)?

NO!

Page 21: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Article 52(2) EPC– “rules and methods for … doing business” are

not to be regarded as “inventions”

Page 22: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• T 931/95– pure business methods as such are not

patentable

Page 23: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Conclusion– Patent protection of software is possible in

Europe, but it is necessary to identify a technical effect.

– Business methods are rejected by the European examiners.

Page 24: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Is Software patentable in the U.S.A.?

YES!

Page 25: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Software:– Same as any other invention– Must be new, useful, non-obvious– Approximately 16’000 software-related

U.S. patents each year

Page 26: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Acceptable software-related inventions:– Computer aided design software– Insurance and financial software systems– Debuggers– Operating systems– E-commerce solutions– Compilers– Business methods– etc.

Page 27: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Non-acceptable inventions:– Mathematical laws (e.g. Fourrier transform)– Laws of nature

Processes based on these laws and implemented by computer programs are patentable, if new, useful and non-obvious.

Page 28: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Important for any patent application in the U.S.A.– Describe the best mode– Cite relevant prior art, including competing

solutions

Page 29: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Important in particular for software patent applications in the U.S.A.– Use flowcharts– File early in the development process or

submit source code (duty of disclosure)

Page 30: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Trends of U.S. Companies– Aggressive patenting of software development– Litigation increase (more than 2’500 lawsuits

each year)– Huge damages (up to several millions dollars)– Negotiations (97% settle prior to trial)

Page 31: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Are Business Methods patentablein the U.S.A.?

Yes, but…

Page 32: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Business method patents:– Highly scrutinized by the U.S. examiners– Long delays– Small percentage of U.S. patents

Page 33: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Conclusion– File– File early– Disclose everything that you know– Be ready to negotiate

Page 34: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

• Conclusion– Software patents in Europe: Yes, if…– Business method patents in Europe: NO!

– Software patents in the U.S.A.: YES!– Busin. meth. patents in the U.S.A.: Yes, but…

Page 35: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Questions?

Page 36: OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.

OVERVIEW EUROPE (EPC) UNITED STATES CONCLUSION

Copyright © KATZAROV S.A. 23/01/2007

Olivier Sacroug

Katzarov SAEuropean Patent & Trademark Attorneys

Geneva and Basel

[email protected]: +41 22 342 66 30Fax: +41 22 342 66 15

www.katzarov.com

Thank You!