Online Surveys as Data Collection Instruments in Education Research: A Feasible Option? EMASA 2012 - Dr Lorinda Minnaar
Dec 22, 2015
Online Surveys as
Data Collection Instruments
in Education Research:
A Feasible Option?
EMASA 2012 - Dr Lorinda Minnaar
Introduction
Study Title School Governance and Leadership for Sustainable Quality Education for All
Study ThemeSchool governance and leadership
Key Purpose of the StudyTo explore and establish the ability of parent members of school governing bodies to govern and manage schools’ finances
Research DesignApproachLarge-scale, exploratory, quantitative study
SampleAll (1433) schools in the Western Cape (WCED)
ParticipantsSchool principals
Data Collection Instrument Online survey
Motivation for Choice of an Online Survey
• Large sample – 1433 schools• Financial and human resource
constraints• An online survey is a
convenient and cost-effective data collection method
• Access to“Checkbox”
Review of Literature on Online
Surveys
Problem Solution
Despite an extensive search, existing literature documenting the feasibility of this data collection method in an education research context, seems deficient
Adapt existing literature to the purpose and design of the study, located within a South African educational research context
Types of Online SurveysE-mail an introductory letter or invitation to respondents with a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) hyperlink to a web-based survey Send respondents a survey embedded in an e-mail message with or without an attachmentPlace a general request for respondents in an electronic communication environment such as a web page to complete a survey
Advantages of Online Surveys
Global reachLarge samples easily accessedTime-efficient and convenientLow preparation and administration costsEnvironmentally friendlyQuestion diversityQuestion sequencing capabilitiesQuestion branching capabilitiesEase of data entry and analysis
Disadvantages of Online Surveys
Perceptions as SpamLack of participant online
experience and expertiseComputer configurationImpersonalSecurity and confidentiality
Planning the Online Survey
Planning the online survey entailed:• Drafting the hard copy • Placing instructions, questions and answer
options in simple tables• Continually revising instructions and questions
to ensure they did not contain design errors such as confusing ambiguities, double, split and negative questions and value-laden concepts
• Consulting an expert in the field of school governance to seek confirmation that questions were valid, meaningful, grammatically correct and appropriate to the research theme
Designing the Online Survey
Designing the online survey entailed the following methodological considerations:• Selecting a visual layout comprising design
elements such as background colour, font face, size and colour
• Uploading Stellenbosch University’s oak leaf logo, which not only lent colour and formality to the survey but immediately informed participants of the survey’s origin
• Avoiding and eliminating complex, vague and ambiguous instructions that may perplex and frustrate participants to such an extent that they exit the survey before completing it
• Checking the survey’s length to ensure it was not too long and that participants would not spend too much time completing it
Long surveys with matrix type questions that have numerous
items and alternatives, increase respondent fatigue and boredom and frequently result in
respondents adopting a “satisficing” behaviour where they select the same scale-point to rate all items without paying them much attention (Mora 2010)
Designing the Online Survey (Cont).
Question Formats (Cont).
Open-Ended Multi-Line Text Allows freeform text within a box with a specified number of rows and columns
Question Formats (Cont).
Matrixes and Rating Scales Explore the frequency of participants’ behaviour or their attitudes toward certain phenomena
Activating the Online Survey
Activating the online survey included the following aspects:• Sourcing the e-mail addresses of schools in the
sample• Checking e-mail addresses for errors• Deliberating on which day, week and month to
activate the survey• Determining the period permitted for participants to
respond and the final date for submission• The frequency of reminders to be sent to participants• Compiling an appropriate invitation to principals to
participate in the survey
Response Rates and Results
Activation and
Reminders
Number of Surveys sent
Number of Surveys
Completed and Returned
Response Rate
1st 1 433 64 4%
2nd 1 433 44 3%
3rd 1 433 37 2%
4th 1 433 220 15%
24%Overall
Response Rate
Low response rates appear typical of online surveys
Response Rates and Results
(Cont).
B a r/Co lu m n P lo t o f Co u n t o f 1
S p re a d sh e e t1 4 3 v*6 c
Co u n t o f 1
1 8 %
1 5 %1 5 %
1 %0 %
0 %
3 Re le va n t2 In te re sti n g
1 Q u i ckO th e r
4 L o n g5 Co m p l i ca te d
Q u a l i ty o f su rve y
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 5
4 0
4 5
1 8 %
1 5 %1 5 %
1 %0 %
0 %
Participants’ Responses to the Quality of the Survey
Conclusion“How feasible are Internet-based online surveys used as data collection instruments for educational research?”
• Denscombe (2009, 281) asserts “There are still several unanswered questions concerning the use of online surveys as data collection instruments for research purposes”.
• Despite implementation of salient methodological considerations, the relatively low response rate alerts educational researchers to use online surveys as data collection instruments circumspectly.