Top Banner
Ocean Carriers Inc. A Case Study By ab
26

Ocean Carriers

Nov 14, 2014

Download

Documents

classmate

ocean carriers,harvard case,finance case,corporate finance
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ocean Carriers

Ocean Carriers Inc.

A Case Study

By ab

Page 2: Ocean Carriers

Introduction

• Ocean Carriers Inc. owned and operated cape-size dry bulk carriers worldwide.

• Major Cargo type : Iron ore.• Vessel sizes : 80000 DWT to 210000 DWT.• Cape-size carriers travel around Cape Horn

rather than the Panama Canal due to size constraints.

Page 3: Ocean Carriers

Operations

• Maintaining Supplies • And on board Stores

• Maintaining Supplies • And on board Stores

• Repairs• Repairs

• Insurance• Insurance• Supply of Lubricants• Supply of Lubricants

Cargo Operations

Cargo Operations

MaintenanceMaintenance

Page 4: Ocean Carriers

Business Model

• Mostly chartered on “time charter ” basis for one, three , or five year periods.

• Occasionally spot charter market was used too.• Charterer paid a daily hire rate for entire duration.• They controlled where the cargo was loaded and

unloaded and also determined the cargo.• OC Inc. supplied a qualified crew along with a

seaworthy carrier which complied with international norms.

Page 5: Ocean Carriers

Brief History

• In 2003, the average daily operating costs amounted to $ 4000.

• This cost increased annually at 1% due to inflation.

• Charterers were not charged for days spent in maintenance and repair but operating cost were still incurred.

Page 6: Ocean Carriers

Maintenance Work Time Details

• Initially 8 days a year for repairs and maintenance.

• This time increased to 12 days per year for ships operating for more than 5 years.

• For ships operating for more than 10 years the repair and maintenance days increased to 16 day per year.

Page 7: Ocean Carriers

Operating Policies

• Ocean Carriers didn’t operate ships which were more than 15 years old.

• As per international maritime regulations they underwent special surveys every 5 years for seaworthiness of the carriers.

• As per the norms maintenance costs of ships older than 15 years was too high.

• To avoid these costs they sold the ships in scrap or second hand market before the third survey.

Page 8: Ocean Carriers

SWOT Analysis

Strengths• New and Larger vessels compared to industry• So premium is earned compared to market

Weaknesses• Too much dependence on basic industries• Not much product differentiation

Opportunities• Great demand for iron ore and coal products in a strong economy• Australian production and Indian Exports creating long term demand

Threats• Probability of defaulting of Charterer• Future estimates not entirely reliable

Page 9: Ocean Carriers

Case Brief

• Background:– Mary Linn, VP Finance at OC Inc is evaluating

options whether to invest and if yes how to invest in the new ship to be leased in 2003

• Aim:– To evaluate the various options of capital

budgeting, leasing, owning and resale of the new project

Page 10: Ocean Carriers

ANALYSIS

Page 11: Ocean Carriers

Assumptions

• Ocean Carriers is a U.S. firm• Discount rate is taken to be 9%• In case of 15 year life of the ship, the resale

value in 2017 is calculated by assuming that the ‘then discount rate’ would be 12%

• Corporate tax rate is assumed to be 35% (Source: US Federal Reserve Data Release, 2001)

Page 12: Ocean Carriers

Assumptions Continued

• Ocean Carriers is located in Hong Kong, where owners of Hong Kong ships are not required to pay any tax on profits made overseas and are also exempted from paying any tax on profit made on cargo uplifted from Hong Kong.

• Discount rate is 9%• Inflation rate is 0.4% (Source: Central Bank of

China data release, 2001)

Page 13: Ocean Carriers

Options Available

Don’t invest in new ship

BuildOperate for 15 yrs

Sell off or scrap thereafter

What to choose?

BuildOperate for 15 yrs

Sell off or scrap thereafter

Page 14: Ocean Carriers

Option 1: 15 Years Life

• The DCF analysis of this option gives us the following results:

Model NPV at 9 % disc rate IRR

With tax(35%) US based ($37,95,134) 7.08%

Without tax HK based $84,73,934 12.94%

Page 15: Ocean Carriers

Option 2 : 25 years life

• The DCF analysis of this option gives us the following results:

Model NPV at 9 % disc rate IRR

With tax(35%) US based ($44,94,824) 6.88%

Without tax HK based $78,88,144

12.44%

Page 16: Ocean Carriers

Business Implications of the analysis:Assume the company is based in US

Page 17: Ocean Carriers

Recommendations

• NPVs of both the options are negative• Also, the IRR of both the options are less than the

existing discount rate• As a result, we recommend that Ocean Carriers Inc.

should not go for the investment in the ship• The tax rate of 35% is considerably large• The initial $39 million purchase of the new ship is

never fully recovered by expected future revenues since NPV is negative in both the cases

• Thus, the investment is too much of a financial burden for Ocean Carriers Inc.

Page 18: Ocean Carriers

Business Implications of the analysis: Assume the company is based in HK

Page 19: Ocean Carriers

Recommendations

• Considering the zero tax assumption, we can see that the NPV of both the options is positive and that for 15 year life is more than the 25 year life

• Thus, assuming the company is based in Hong Kong, the company must go for the 15 year life option owing to the higher NPV

Page 20: Ocean Carriers

Reasons for selecting the 15 years life option

• As stated earlier, the NPV of this option is more than the other

• As the ship gets older than 15 years, the hire rate starts decreasing more rapidly as seen from Exhibit 4

• As it can be seen from the following graph, the hire rate reduces more rapidly after 2017

Page 21: Ocean Carriers

Expected Daily Hire Rate vs Age

Page 22: Ocean Carriers

Sell of the ship and don’t scrap

• As seen in Exhibit 6, the ship has the potential to generate cash flows even after 15 years

• The estimated resale value of the ship at the end of 15 years assuming that the life can be extended up to 25 years is $2,41,78,423

• This value is significantly higher than the scrap value of $5,000,000

• Also, the company has a policy of not operating the ships older than 15 years old

• But, there exists a potential for selling off the ship since some other companies do operate with ships older than 25 years of age as seen from Exhibit 2

Page 23: Ocean Carriers

Continued….

• The current inflation was pegged at 0.4%. But, in case in the future years, say 15 years hence, if the inflation rises above 0.4%, then there would be a significant increase in the operating costs and working capital requirements

• Thus, the current forecasts for 20 -25 years down the line may not hold good

• Thus, even with this case it is better to opt for a 15 year life of the ship followed by its resale

Page 24: Ocean Carriers

Ocean Carriers Inc. should accept the 3 year contract

• Amount recovered by the initial contract is $17,192,594• Many a times, new ships may not be leased out

immediately after delivery because of low demand• But, in this case, the ship can be immediately leased

out: meaning it can generate cash inflows immediately on commission

• Also, since the client is in utter need of the ship, he may offer the company a premium of 10-15% which is beneficial for Ocean Carriers Inc.

• Thus, it is profitable for the company to go for the initial 3 year contract

Page 25: Ocean Carriers

Our Recommendations

OC Inc is HK Based Operate it for 15 yrs followed by resale

Accept the initial 3 yr contract for the new ship

Invest in new ship

OC Inc is US Based Don’t invest in new ship

Page 26: Ocean Carriers

THANK YOU