Newsletter Next-Generation Sequencing for Myeloid Malignancies Van Rensburg Introduction There is increasing awareness of the genetic complexity of malignancy. Haematological neoplasms are no exception. The assessment of genetic lesions has become critical for the correct diagnosis and selection of therapy, as well as more accurate prognostication. Multiple different mutations can be present in a tumour and these can have a modifying effect on one another. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology allows evaluation of numerous abnormalities/variants in one analysis. This is of particular value in the setting of myeloid malignancies as many of the conditions can have overlapping clinical and morphological features, and genetic analysis is frequently critical for classification, potentially requiring extensive genetic testing. The Molecular Pathology Department at Lancet Laboratories has performed myeloid NGS for over two years, gaining considerable experience with the technique in a range of haematological conditions. Why use myeloid NGS rather than existing genetic investigations? The diagnosis of many haematological malignancies requires not only confirmation of the presence of certain abnormalities but exclusion of other mutations. An array of traditional tests (e.g. individual PCR and FISH investigations) may be necessary to make the diagnosis. NGS allows for these to be replaced with a single assay leading to an overall reduction in cost. Certain abnormalities cannot be currently tested as stand-alone investigations in the South African market, so the panel allows for local testing and comprehensive coverage of myeloid variants. Compiled by Dr N Holland st 1 Quarter 2020
4
Embed
Next-Generation Sequencing for Myeloid Malignancies · Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology allows evaluation of numerous abnormalities/variants in one analysis. This is of
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Newsletter
Next-Generation Sequencing for Myeloid Malignancies
Van Rensburg
IntroductionThere is increasing awareness of the genetic complexity of malignancy. Haematological neoplasms are no exception. The assessment of genetic lesions has become critical for the correct diagnosis and selection of therapy, as well as more accurate prognostication. Multiple different mutations can be present in a tumour and these can have a modifying effect on one another.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology allows evaluation of numerous abnormalities/variants in one analysis. This is of particular value in the setting of myeloid malignancies as many of the conditions can have overlapping clinical and morphological features, and genetic analysis is frequently critical for classification, potentially requiring extensive genetic testing.
The Molecular Pathology Department at Lancet Laboratories has performed myeloid NGS for over two years, gaining considerable experience with the technique in a range of haematological conditions.
Why use myeloid NGS rather than existing genetic investigations? The diagnosis of many haematological malignancies requires not only confirmation of
the presence of certain abnormalities but exclusion of other mutations. An array of traditional tests (e.g. individual PCR and FISH investigations) may be necessary to make the diagnosis. NGS allows for these to be replaced with a single assay leading to an overall reduction in cost.
Certain abnormalities cannot be currently tested as stand-alone investigations in the South African market, so the panel allows for local testing and comprehensive coverage of myeloid variants.
Compiled by Dr N Holland st 1 Quarter 2020
The actual diagnosis may not have originally been considered by the involved clinician or pathologist due to atypical presentation. Myeloid NGS testing is non-directed and thus facilitates accurate diagnosis.
Myeloid NGS provides a more sensitive assessment of clonality. Haematological disorders such as Myelodysplastic Syndromes require differentiation from reactive conditions which can cause low blood counts and dysplastic change. In 80% � 90% of cases, clonality can be confirmed on NGS, in contrast to the 40% � 50% yield with previous methodologies.
Myeloid NGS does not currently replace cytogenetic analysis. However cytogenetics detects only gross structural chromosomal abnormalities and can only be performed on very fresh samples. It frequently fails due to insufficient material or due to the absence of dividing cells.
Myeloid NGS can detect translocations which may be cryptic on cytogenetic analysis and can define novel translocations involving different gene partners that would be missed on directed FISH studies.
Which conditions are tested for in the myeloid panel performed at Lancet Laboratories?The panel of mutations investigated includes comprehensive assessment of the well described recurrent genetic abnormalities seen in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and overlap syndromes such as Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukaemia, as well as the condition-defining abnormalities seen, for example, in myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and gene rearrangement.
The internationally standardised Oncomine� Myeloid Assay (with sensitivity down to 5%) is utilised to ensure quality results. Please see Table 1 for the full list of variants included in the panel.
NGS can also be useful in the evaluation of unexplained cytopaenias or in certain haematological abnormalities which have a germline predisposition.
HOTSPOT FULL GENE FUSION EXPRESSION
ABL1
BRAF
CBL
CSF3R
DNMT3A
FLT3
GATA2
HRAS
IDH1
IDH2
JAK2
KIT
KRAS
MPL
MYD88
NPM1
NRAS
PTPN11
SETBP1
SF3B1
SRSF2
U2AF1
WT1
WT1
ASXL1
BCOR
CALR
CEBPA
ETV6
EZH2
IKZF1
NF1
PHF6
PRPF8
RB1
RUNX1
SH2B3
STAG2
TET2
TP53
ZRSR2
ABL1 BAALC
ALK MECOM
BCL2 MYC
BRAF SMC1A
CCND1 WT1
CREBBP
ETV6
EGFR
FGFR1
FGFR2
FUS
HMGA2
JAK2
KMT2A (MILL)
MECOM
MET
MLLT10
MLLT3
MYBL1
MYH11
NTRK3
NUP214
PDGFRA
PDGFRB
RARA
RBM15
RUNX1
TCF3
TFE3
Table 1. Variants included in the Oncomine� Myeloid Assay
Dys
pla
sia
or
inef
fect
ive
haem
atro
po
iese
s
Increased proliferation
Normal
Loss of diffl
erentiatio
n
MDS MDP/MPN
02 AML
MPN
AML
Myeloid Disorder Development
Practical pointsWhich clinicians request myeloid NGS?The test is frequently requested by the treating clinical haematologist or oncologist. In certain cases, the haematological pathologist will recommend testing to the treating physician based on the patient�s bone marrow or peripheral blood findings. This could be a newly diagnosed or a suspected haematological malignancy in a patient who has not as yet been transferred to a super-specialist.
What conditions would benefit from Myeloid NGS testing?The analysis is of benefit in the setting of clonal myeloid disorders such as Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (e.g. Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukaemia). Repeat testing may be necessary if the haematological malignancy shows findings suggestive of disease progression/evolution. Testing may also be requested in the context of unexplained low or high blood counts to investigate clonality.
When is myeloid NGS performed?The test will most frequently be performed at the time of the initial diagnostic bone marrow investigation. If disease progression or relapse is suspected, the analysis may be repeated to reassess the clonal signature. In certain cases, the analysis will be used for evaluation of residual disease, however the current assay (with a sensitivity of 5%) is not suitable for minimal residual disease analysis.
What samples are required?The test is performed on a peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirate sample drawn in an EDTA tube. If it is uncertain whether the investigation is necessary, a myeloid extract can be performed and the sample stored for up to a month. Processing can be done within that period if the analysis is required.
Where is the test done and how is it requested?The specimens are processed by the Lancet Laboratories Molecular Pathology Department at Richmond, Johannesburg. The test can be requested on a bone marrow or peripheral blood requisition form as Myeloid NGS. If there are any queries about the test, please discuss with the haematologist on call (via Lancet Switchboard � 011 358 0800) or the Molecular Pathology Department (via [email protected]).
AML with mutated NPM1 and FLT3ITD (cytogenetically normal)
What is the turnaround time on the test?TAT: 10 to 14 days
What is the report format?The report describes the gene variants and fusions detected and discusses the diagnostic and prognostic significance of the abnormalities in relation to the provisional diagnosis. In addition, a list of the clinical trials and relevant FDA, NCCN, EMA and ESMO recommended therapies (in the setting of a particular mutation) are supplied. This is the Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter (OKR) report. The reports are available on the Lancet Pathportal and Oculus, and, in the case of bone marrow samples, as a consolidated diagnostic report.
ConclusionThere is increasing emphasis on precision medicine. As our understanding of the complexity of the genetic landscape of cancer increases, the requirement to map the pattern in individual malignancies becomes apparent. The data informs diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic decision making. Myeloid next-generation sequencing allows extensive analysis of the make-up of myeloid malignancies such as AML, MDS and MPN. As full assessment of malignancy increasingly requires evaluation of multiple genes, NGS provides a comprehensively informative, cost-effective and time-saving approach.
References1. Yang F & Press RD. Next-Generation Sequencing multi-gene mutation panels in
myeloid malignancies. The Hematologist 2016; 13(3): 6 � 7. 2. Valent P, et al. Proposed minimal diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes
(MDS) and potential pre-MDS conditions. Oncotarget 2017; 8(43): 73483 � 73500. 3. Grinfeld J, et al. Classification and personalized prognosis in Myeloproliferative
Neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2018; 379(15): 1416 � 1430. 4. Gotlib J. How I treat atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017; 129(7): 838 �
845. 5. Solary E & Itzykson R. How I treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood 2017;
130(2): 126 � 136.6. Leisch M, et al. Next-Generation Sequencing in AML � on the way to becoming a
new treatment standard for treatment initiation and/or modulation? Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11(2): pii. E252.
7. Bacher U, et al. Challenges in the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnostics of myeloid malignancies into routine clinical use. Blood Cancer J 2018; 8(11): 113.
8. Kim B, et al. Targeted next generation sequencing can serve as an alternative to conventional tests in myeloid neoplasms. PLoS One 2019; 14(3): e0212228.
9. Swerdlow SH, et al. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, revised fourth edition. Lyon, France: IARC; 2017.
10. Deininger MWN et al. Turning the tide in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat Rev Cancer 2017; 17(7): 425-440.
design done and printed by: ELECTRONIC LABORATORY SERVICES (PTY) LTD PRINT BUREAUcorporate branding/newsletters/south africa/2019/N00195 Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for Myeloid Malignancies A3 Eng Duplex 170gsm Leo Nov2019.cdr| Rev000