New SPECs When Good Intentions are not Enough
Dec 17, 2015
6 May 1856, Freiberg, Moravia, Czech Republic
Sigismund Freud is born Went on to develop
– Psychoanalysis– Way of helping individuals
• Based on unconscious• Based on defenses• Based on detachment
Freud had good intentions….but his approach was
Deficit oriented
Reactive
Expert driven
Individualistic
Many generations of helpers
Wanted to be little Freuds Studied models that reinforced- Deficit-ism- Reactive-ism- Expert-ism- Individual-ism
In short:
Clienthood and Patienthood
Why???
It’s easier to deal with problems if they have names (hence deficits: neurotic, crazy)
It’s hard to prevent something you don’t see It gives us all a sense of self-importance to be
experts It’s easier to blame people than to change
social conditions (lazy, unmotivated, poor parenting, etc). We’re part of the status quo, like it or not!
Wellness Promotion TreatmentPrevention
99%1%
CONTINUUM OF SERVICES
BUDGET ALLOCATION
Consequences of medical model
Big wake up call!!!
No mass disorder, afflicting humankind, has ever been eliminated, or brought under control, by treating the affected individual
HIV/AIDS, poverty, child abuse, powerlessness are not eliminated one person at a time.
The Need for a new Model
Less Deficits-based Reactive Expert-driven Individualistic
More Strengths-based Primary Prevention Empowerment Community
Conditions
Quadrant IIIExamples:Crisis work, therapy, medications, symptom containment, case management
Quadrant IExamples:Community development, affordable housing policy, recreational opportunities, high quality schools and health services
Quadrant IIExamples:Skill building, emotional literacy, fitness programs, personal improvement plans, resistance to peer pressure in drug and alcohol use
Quadrant IVExamples:Food banks, shelters for homeless people, charities, prison industrial complex
Collective
Proactive
Individual
Reactive
Time and Space: Individualistic and Reactive Approaches are not Enough
Quadrant IExamples:Voice and choice in celebrating and building competencies, recognition of personal and collective resilience
Quadrant IIExamples:Voice and choice in deficit reduction approaches, participation in decisions how to treat affective disorders or physical disorders
Strength
Empowerment
Deficit
Expert driven
Deficits and Expert driven approaches are not helpful!!!
Quadrant IIIExamples:Labeling and diagnosis, “patienthood” and clienthood,” citizens in passive role
Quadrant IVExamples:Just say no! You can do it! Cheerleading approaches, Make nice approaches
And about process
Can’t have a good outcome without a good process
Without a good process the outcomes are superficial and not sustainable
Principles of New SPECs
Ownership by workers and community members
Participation of workers and community members
Home grown solutions Practice and reflection Learning and taking risks together
Goals of New SPECs
Develop practices in line with SPEC Develop policies in line with SPEC Institutionalize SPEC in the life of the
organization and the community
Challenges in New SPECs
Too much process without outcomes Too many outcomes without a good
process Institutionalize SPEC in the life of the
organizations Ownership for sustainability “Power before program”
Opportunities
Create in partnership a new model for health and human services
Help in efficient ways millions of people who are currently suffering because the conditions are too overwhelming for them to overcome on their own
Educate millions of health and human service providers on the benefits of a SPEC approach
Accomplishments to date
Commitment Research Learning Perseverance Changes in various organizations Energized workforce Meaning
Venice’s Lesson
“The psychotherapist, social worker or social reformer, concerned only with his own clients and their grievance against society, perhaps takes a view comparable to the private citizen of Venice who concerns himself only with the safety of his own dwelling and his own ability to get about the city. But if the entire republic is slowly being submerged, individual citizens cannot afford to ignore their collective fate, because, in the end, they all drown together if nothing is done” (Badcock, 1982)