An Empirical Study on Faith- Based Microfinance as an Alternative Tool of Poverty Alleviation PhD Viva-voce Presentation Najmul Hoda Internal Guide : Prof. Dr. S.L.Gupta External Guide : Prof. Dr. Viqar A. Baig PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015 Department of Management Birla Institute of Technology Mesra 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
An Empirical Study on Faith-Based Microfinance as an Alternative Tool of Poverty
AlleviationPhD Viva-voce Presentation
Najmul Hoda
Internal Guide : Prof. Dr. S.L.GuptaExternal Guide : Prof. Dr. Viqar A. Baig
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Department of ManagementBirla Institute of Technology Mesra
1
The Patna Parish Thrift and Credit
Cooperative Limited
Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti
Al-Khair Cooperative Credit Society
2
Outline 1. Overview
– Problem – Contributions & Publications
2. Need for Study3. Theoretical Underpinning
– Review of Literature and the Conceptual Framework
4. Research Methodology5. Empirical Findings
– Case Studies– Survey Results – Poverty Alleviation and
Contributions and Publications (SSRN/Researchgate/Academia)
1. Hoda, N., and Gupta, S.L. (2015). Faith-based Organizations and Microfinance: A Literature Review, Asian Social Science. Vol. 11 No. 9, (Scopus Indexed)
2. Hoda, N., and Gupta, S.L. (2015). Client Satisfaction in Faith-based Microfinance: A Comparison with Mainstream Models of Microfinance, Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development. Vol. 36 No. 2 (Scopus Indexed)
3. Hoda, N., and Gupta, S.L. (2014). Loan Portfolio of Faith-based Microfinance Institution: An Empirical Analysis, Post Modern Openings, Vol 5 No. 1. (Ebsco Indexed)
4. Hoda, N., and Gupta, S L. (2013). Faith Based Model of Microfinance: A Case Study of Al Khair Cooperative Society. Jharkhand Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 11 No. 1. Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi, India
5. Hoda, N. and Gupta, S L. (2010). Faith Based Model of Microfinance: A Case Study of Al Khair Cooperative Society. International Seminar on Islamic Finance in India. IRTI, IDB Jeddah. KSA
9
Additional Publications6. Hoda, N. (2012). Co-operative based Microfinance.
Third International Conference on Institutional and Technological Environment for Microfinance. Burgundy School of Business, Groupe ESC Dijon Bourgogne, France
7. Hoda, N. (2012). Co-operatives as the Key to Responsible Microfinance. Microfinance Focus, an internationally recognized platform for online knowledge platform about microfinance and sustainable development.
8. Hoda, N. (2009). Critical Issues in Effective Management of an NGO: A Case Study of Rajasthan Bal Kalyan Samiti. 2nd International Conference on Leadership and its Role in Preparing the Organisation for Unprecendented Change. Institute of Productivity and Management. Ghaziabad
9. Joshi, S., Hoda, N., and Sharma, M. (2011). Faith Based Model of Microfinance: An Alternative Tool of Poverty Alleviation. Conference of Inclusive Growth and Microfinance Access. Banaras Hindu University. India
10
2. Need for Study
11PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Embracing death Microcredit has been the bane of many a farmer. Many have been forced to commit suicide. https://parisar.wordpress.com/2012/03/
Anjumans deprive Muslim women of microcreditSwaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar, Economic Times Bureau Nov 8, 2009, 10.17am IST 12
Microfinance Industry• Approximately 130 million clients
(World Bank 2014)• Outreach – less than 20%• Growing at a CAGR of 16.61% percent
over the period 2012-2016• Approximately 3 billion poor• The highest concentration of
microfinance accounts in the world is in India (188 million accounts representing 18% of the total national population)
13PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
3. Theoretical Underpinnings
14PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Literature Review
Extant researches on mainstream microfinance institutions
Conceptual framework of faith-based organizations, development and microfinance
Important References• Adams, D and von Pischke, J. D., 1992. Microenterprise credit
programs: ‘deja vu’, World Development 20, 1463-1470• Armendáriz de Aghion, B. and Morduch, J., 2000, Microfinance
Beyond Group Lending. Economics of Transition, 8: 401–420• Basargekar, P., 2009. Microcredit and a Macro Leap: An Impact
Analysis of Annapurna Mahila Mandal (AMM) - An Urban Microfinance Institution in India The IUP Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. VII, Nos. 3 & 4, pp. 105-120, September & December
• Consultative Group for Assistance of the Poor (CGAP), 2010. Global Implications of the Crisis in Indian Microfinance, Focus Note 67, Washington DC
• Deaton, A., 2006. Measuring poverty. In A. Banerjee, R. Benabou, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding poverty (pp. 3–15). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
• Dichter T, and Harper, M. (eds), 2007. What's wrong with microfinance? Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing
21
Prize motivation: "for his analysis of consumption, poverty, and welfare”- Focus on India
The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2015
Angus Deaton
22PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Faith-based Organizations
“a faith-based organization is any organization that derives inspiration and guidance for its activities from the teachings and principles of the faith or from a particular interpretation or school of thought within that faith”(Clarke and Jennings 2008, p6)
23PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Influence of faith on FBOs
• Organizational Characteristics
1.Mission statement2.Founding3.Affiliation4.Controlling board5.Senior management6.Support7.Personnel religious
practices
• Programme Characteristics
1.Religious environment
2.Program content3.Integration of
religious components4.Expected connection
between religious content and desired outcome
24PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Faiths and Financial Transactions
• Principles of lending• Interest rates• Wealth accumulation• Trade• Charity
25PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
List of Faith-based MFIsName Study Faith affiliation Country/ Head Office
Christian Aid Varndell (2005),
Harper et al. (2007)
Christianity UK/Oxford
Muslim Aid Clarke (2008 ) Islam UK/London
SKDRDP Harper , et al. (2007), Ashta (2011),
Shetty (2009)
Jain India/Mangalore
Hand In Hand M-CRIL (2010) Christianity UK/London India/Tamil
Nadu
Akhuwat Harper , et al. (2007) Islam Pakistan/Lahore
COVA Harper, et al. (2007), Kaur (2007) Islam India/Hyderabad
Al Farz Foundation Khaled (2011) Islam Pakistan/Lahore
CAPARV Harper , et al. (2007) Islam India/Imphal
ESAF Harper , et al. (2007) Christianity India/Chennai
Al Khair Cooperative Credit
Society
Khan (2009) Islam India/Patna26PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
27
Catholic Relief Services Harper , et al. (2007) Islam India/Ranchi
The Holy Cross Social Service
Centre
Harper , et al. (2007) Islam India/Hazaribagh
LEAP Harper , et al. (2007) Christianity Liberia/Monrovia
Village Development Project Bradley (2009) Hinduism India/Jodhpur
Oxfam Bradley (2009) Christianity UK/Oxford
Islamic Relief Worldwide Cordier (2009),
Kirmani and Khan (2008)
Islam UK/London
World Jewish Relief (WJR) Kessler and Arkush (2009) Jewism UK/London
Muslim Fund Deoband Khan and Nisar (2004) Islam India/Deoband
United Methodist Committee on Relief
Clarke (2008) Christianity USA/New York
Chinmaya Mission Sidhabari Paul (2012), Paranjape (2005) Hinduism India/Sidhabari
SNDP Minimol and Makesh (2012) Hinduism India/Kerala
4. Research Methodology
28PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
AIMS-SEEP Framework Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise
Services (AIMS) - Small Enterprise Education and Promotion (SEEP)
1.the changes that occur in clients’ lives, their enterprises, their families/households, and their communities;
2.the extent to which the identified changes are related to clients’ participation in the microfinance program
Six Design Strategies
29
Research Methodology• AIMS-SEEP Framework – Matured Clients only• Two phased study
Phase 1 - Case StudyPhase 2 - Impact Assessment
30PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Phase 1 – Case Study• Selection of FB-MFIs • Data gathering -
organization documents, archival records, interviews, direct observations, participant observation and physical artifacts
• Data analysis (framework)
31PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Phase 2 – Impact Assessment
Poverty Variables A. Social Impact1. Self Confidence2. Social StatusB. Women Empowerment3. Treatment of others4. Awareness of rightsC. Economic Impact5. Household Income6. Business Income7. Household Savings8. Ability to meet emergency
needs
Client Satisfaction1. Reasonability of interest
rate on loan2. Loan procedure3. Loan repayment policy4. Availability of loan5. Discrimination in selection6. Technical Assistance to
clients for business7. Location of the branch or
point of transaction8. Staff support
32
Impact Assessment Methodology
• Purposive sampling – 150 from Mainstream and 50 each from the three FB-MFIs – Total 300
• Data Collection – Use of survey questionnaire, Self-administered and with the help of Daily Collection Agents
• Comparison of two set of MFIs – t-Test
33PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
5. Empirical FindingsA. Case Studies
34
Institutional Overview
35
As of 2012 GRAVIS ACCSL PTCCSL
Deposit (in Rupees) NA 2.1 Crores 93.83 Lakhs
Loan Outstanding (in
Rupees)
2.13 Crores 1.6 Crores 2.48 Crores
Number of
beneficiaries/member
s
16790 5221 1149
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Influence of Faith on Organization
36
Factors GRAVIS ACCSL PTSCCLMission statement
X X
FoundingAffiliationControlling Board
X
Senior ManagementSupport X X XPersonnel religious practices:
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
37
Factors GRAVIS ACCSL PTSCCL
Religious environment
Program content:
Integration of religious
componentsX X X
Expected connection
between religious
content and desired
outcome
X
Influence of Faith on Programme
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
5. Empirical FindingsB. Impact Assessment
38PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Gender Distribution
39
Gender Mainstream Faith-based
Male 4(2.67%) 52 (35%)
Female 146(97.33%) 97 (65%)
TOTAL 150(100.00%) 149 (100%)
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Occupation of respondents
Occupation Mainstream Faith-based
Service 0(0.00%) 21(14%)
Self-employed 150(100%) 119(80%)
Daily wages 0(0.00%) 09(06%)
TOTAL 150(100.00%) 149(100%)40PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Types of self-employment
Type Mainstream Faith-based
Agriculture 7(4.67%) 10(8%)
Small traders 35(23.33%) 60(51%)
Services 21(14.00%) 35(29%)
Manufacturing 87(58.00%) 14(12%)
TOTAL 150(100.00%) 119(100%)41PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Incidence of borrowing from MFI
42PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Average Loan amount
43PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Repayment period
44PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Loan repayment frequency
45PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
46
Summary of results of hypotheses testing
PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
47
A. HYPOTHESES RELATED TO IMPACT OF THE PROGRAMME
Variables Hypothesis Remark
HA1:improvement in self-confidence Rejected Beneficiaries of secular microfinance
report greater impact on this variable.
HA2:improvement in status Rejected Beneficiaries of faith based microfinance
report greater impact on this variable.
HA3:treatment to women Accepted No significant difference found.
HA4: awareness of women’s rights Accepted No significant difference found.
HA5: improvement in monthly income Accepted No significant difference found.
HA6: improvement in business income Accepted No significant difference found.
HA7:improvement in household savings
Rejected Beneficiaries of secular microfinance report greater impact on this variable.
HA8:improvement in ability to meet emergency needs
Accepted No significant difference found.
48
B. HYPOTHESES RELATED TO CLIENT SATISFACTIONVariables Hypothes
isRemark
HB1: reasonability of interest rate
Accepted Beneficiaries of secular microfinance report greater impact on this variable.
HB2: loan procedure Accepted Beneficiaries of faith based microfinance report greater impact on this variable.
HB3: repayment policy Rejected No significant difference found.HB4: timely availability of loan
Rejected No significant difference found.
HB5: discrimination among borrowers
Rejected No significant difference found.
HB6: technical assistance for business improvement
Accepted No significant difference found.
HB7: location of the branch or place of transaction.
Accepted Beneficiaries of secular microfinance report greater impact on this variable.
HB8: staff support Rejected No significant difference found.
6. Conclusions & Future directions
49
Myths broken• Also a microfinance model – share
the same principles and products• No discrimination• Not for women only• No one-size-fits-all product
50PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Value Addition by FB-MFIs
• Savings facility• Customized products• Interest rates• Over-indebtedness• Cultural issues• Grass-root organizations• Empowerment• Impact of faith
51PhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
Future directions• An Appraisal of Financial Sustainability of Faith-based
microfinance institutions; • Role of faith in the Social Capital Formation by Faith-
based microfinance; • Mainstreaming Faith-based Microfinance: Performance
Evaluation; • An Assessment of the Common Virtues of Mainstream
and Faith-based Microfinance and the Value Addition in the Process of Poverty Alleviation.
• Religious Social Capital as a Substitute of Physical Collateral in Microfinance.
• Impact Assessment of Faith-based Microfinance institutions
52
Acknowledgements
AcknowledgmentsPhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015
• My Guides – Dr S. L. Gupta and Dr Viqar A. Baig
• Dr Munish Makkad, Director, BIT Noida• Dr Meenakshi Pradeep, Dr Arun Mittal and all
in the BIT Noida centre• Smt Shashi Tyagi, Chairman, GRAVIS• Mr Arshad Ajmal, Founder President, Al-Khair• Mr Francis Joseph, President, Patna Parish
Credit Cooperative• All the Daily Collection Agents
d53
?QuestionsPhD. Viva-voce : N.Hoda, November 24, 2015