Montreal 2000 1 The Theoretical Dimension of Mathematics: a Challenge for Didacticians Mariolina Bartolini Bussi Dipartimento di Matematica Modena - Italia bartolini@unim o.it Plenary speech given at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group Université du Québec à Montréal - May 28th 2000
55
Embed
Montreal 20001 The Theoretical Dimension of Mathematics: a Challenge for Didacticians Mariolina Bartolini Bussi Dipartimento di Matematica Modena - Italia.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Plenary speech given at the 24th Annual Meetingof the Canadian Mathematics Education Study
GroupUniversité du Québec à Montréal - May 28th 2000
Montreal 2000 2
Theoreticalknowledge
PME reportsforum 97
plen. 2000
4 teamsGenoa (Boero)
Modena (Bartolini)Pisa (Mariotti)
Turin (Arzarello)
All grades
Complementary2nd order
approaches
Epistemological
Didactical
Cognitive
Montreal 2000 3
Theoreticalknowledge
BookKluwer
to appear
4 teams
All grades
Complementary2nd order
approaches
Epistemological
Didactical
Cognitive
Montreal 2000 4
Theoreticalknowledge
SemioticMediation
From ‘empirical’ to ‘theoretical’ compass
5th grade
Overcoming conceptual mistakes
7th grade
Montreal 2000 5
From ‘empirical’ to ‘theoretical’ compass (5th grade)
Field of experience
The functioning of gears in everyday objects:
predictive hypotheses
interpretative hypotheses
Montreal 2000 6
From ‘empirical’ to ‘theoretical’ compass (5th grade)
Field of experience
The functioning of gears in everyday objects:
predictive hypotheses
interpretative hypotheses
Montreal 2000 7
Algebraic and geometrical modelling
T T
TERC MA
Montreal 2000 8
The Task (5th grade)
Draw a circle, with radius 4 cm, tangent to both circles.Explain carefully your method and justify it.
Montreal 2000 9
Veronica’s solution
The first thing I have done was to find the centre of the wheel C;I have made by trial and error, in fact I have immediately found the distance between the wheel B and C. Then I have found the distance between A and C and I have given the right 'inclination' to the two segments, so that the radius of C measured 4cm in all the cases. Then I have traced the circle.
Montreal 2000 10
Veronica’s solution
JUSTIFICATIONI am sure that my method works because it agrees with the three theories we have found :The points of tangency H and G are aligned with ST and TR ;II) The segments ST and TR meet the points of tangency H and G ;III) the segments ST and TR are equal to the sum of the radii SG and GT, TH and HR.
Montreal 2000 11
The classroom discussionof Veronica’s protocol
Teacher : Veronica has tried to give ‘the right inclination’. Which segments is she speaking of ? Many of you open the compass 4 cm. Does Veronica use the segment of 4 cm? What does she say she is using ? [Veronica's text is read again.It becomes clear that she is using segments of 6 and 7 cms]
Montreal 2000 12
The classroom discussion
Jessica : She uses the two segments ...Maddalena : .. given by the sum of radii[Some pupils point with thumb-index at the ‘sum’ segments on Veronica's drawing and try to 'move' them like sticks. They continue to rotate them till the end of the discussion]
Montreal 2000 13
The classroom discussion
Teacher : How did she make ?Giuseppe : She has rotated a segment.Veronica : Had I used one segment only, I could have used the compass […].I planned to make RT perpendicular and then I moved ST and RT until they touched each other and the radius of C was 4 cm.
Montreal 2000 14
The classroom discussion
Alessio : I had planned to take two compasses, to open them 7 and 6 and to look whether they found the centre. But I could not use two compasses.Stefania P. : Like me ; I too had two compasses in the mind.
Montreal 2000 15
The classroom discussion
Elisabetta [excited] : She has taken the two segments of 6 and 7, has kept the centre still and has rotated : ah I have understood !
Stefania P. : ... to find the centre of the wheel ...
Elisabetta : ... after having found the two segments ...
Stefania P. : ... she has moved the two segments.
Montreal 2000 16
The classroom discussion
Teacher : Moved ? Is moved a right word ?Voices : Rotated .. as if she had the compass. Alessio : Had she translated them, she had moved the centre.Andrea : I have understood, teacher, I have understood really, look at me …Voices : Yes, the centre comes out there, it's true.
Moved?
Rotated!
Translated?
Montreal 2000 17
The classroom discussion
Alessio : It's true but you cannot use two compassesVeronica : You can use a compass first on one side and then on the other.Teacher: Good pupils. Now draw the two circles on your sheet.[All the pupils draw the two circles on their sheet and identify the two solutions].
Montreal 2000 18
The two solutions
Montreal 2000 19
Veronica’s first solution
Dynamic / Procedural
A circle is the figure described when a straight line, always remaining in one plane, moves about one extremity as a fixed point until it returns to its first position (Hero)
Montreal 2000 20
The final shared solutionStatic / Relational
A circle is a plane figure contained by one line such that all the straight lines falling upon it from one point among those lying within the figure are equal to one another
(Euclid)
Montreal 2000 21
An old (yet topical) problem ….
Montreal 2000 22
… for studentsExcerpt from an interview
11th gradeI have already proved that that segment [KM] is always constant. … No, I haven't proved it because I haven't proved that this one [KM] rotates ...or something like that.…Now I must also say why the locus is a circle, shouldn’t I? Shall I prove it?
After having proved that while C moves on C1, the segment KM (M is the midpoint of EF) does not change
Montreal 2000 23
INT. Haven't you done it? you said that this one [KM] always remains constant.It remains constant....INT. How do you define a circle?I define it as locus.. you are right... locus of points equidistant from the centre... it crossed my mind that I had to prove also... no... maybe it is stupid ... that I had to prove that it was rotating around the centre …
from Mariotti, Mogetta & Maracci, 2000
Montreal 2000 24
… and for mathematiciansThe compass and the continuum
Do the two circles surely meet?
WHY?
Montreal 2000 25
Different answersThe compass and the continuum
EUCLID: Look at the lines in the drawing
HERO: Rotate the two lines (sticks, fingers, arms …) until they clash
DEDEKIND: If in a given plane a circle C has one point X inside and one point Y outside another circle C’, the two circles intersect in two points (continuity).
Montreal 2000 26
In the experiment the compass is used
To draw round shapes
But also ...V. Kandinsky
Montreal 2000 27
… the compass is evoked in the mind and simulated by
means of gestures
To draw circles andto find points at a given distance
Montreal 2000 28
Semiotic Mediation
The simple stimulus-response process is replaced by a complex, mediated act, which we picture as
S --------------- R
X
[This auxiliary stimulus] transfers the psychological operation to higher and qualitatively new forms and permits humans, by the aid of extrinsic stimuli, to control their behaviour from the outside. The use of signs […] creates new forms of a culturally based psychological process (Vygotskij).
Montreal 2000 29
The ‘enriched’ compassmay be
a tool of semiotic mediationdrawing devices
were used for centuries
to construct and ‘prove’
the existence of
the solutions •of geometrical problems•of algebraic equations Cavalieri’s instrument
for parabola
Montreal 2000 30
Our intuition about the continuum is built from invariants which emerge from a plurality of acts of experience:Time, Movement, The Pencil on a sheetTrajectories …….‘L’acte de prévoir, anticiper une trajectoire constitue le fondement antique, l’embryon pré-humain de l’abstraction géométrique humaine’
Giuseppe Longo, 1997http://www.dmi.ens.fr/users/longo/geocogni.html
Montreal 2000 31
First Example
The compass
(and other drawing instruments)
and the problem of continuum
Montreal 2000 32
Second Example
The Abacus
and the polynomial representation of numbers
Montreal 2000 33
Third Example
The Perspectographs
and the roots of projective geometry
Montreal 2000 34
Semiotic mediation
Concreteartefacts
Embodied cognition
Concrete artefactsonly?
Montreal 2000 35
Further examples: microwolds
Geometry as a theory(Mariotti - Handbook - LEA - to appear)
Algebra as a theory(Cerulli - to be presented in ITS 2000 Montreal - June)
Montreal 2000 36
Overcoming conceptual mistakes (5/7th grade)
from Plato’s Meno:
“doubling the square”
Montreal 2000 37
The teaching experimentthe students
• Solve individually the problem posed by Socrates to the slave.
• Read Plato’s dialogue and detect, with the teacher’s guide, the three phases.
• Discuss the content and the different roles played by Socrates and by the slave, with the teacher’s guide.
Montreal 2000 38
Scheme of Plato’s dialogueThe problem: doubling a square
1The slave
is self confident
Socrates
asks questions
The mistake is detected by visual evidence
Montreal 2000 39
Scheme of Plato’s dialogueTowards the awareness that …
2The slave
is insecure
Socrates
asks questions
and makes comments
A new attempt
Montreal 2000 40
Scheme of Plato’s dialogueTowards a general solution
3Socrates
guides the slave
with suitable questions
The slave
follows Socrates
with suitable answers
Montreal 2000 41
The teaching experimentthe students
• Choose another conceptual mistake in a different area, well known by the students
• Discuss collectively about the chosen mistake, with the teacher’s guide.
•Construct individually a ‘Socratic’ dialogue about the chosen mistake
• Compare in collective discussion some ‘dialogues’ produced by the students
Montreal 2000 42
The Task(7th grade)
Write a Socratic dialogue about the following
conceptual mistake
By dividing an integer number by another number,
one always gets a number smaller than the dividend
Montreal 2000 43
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueAim
To realise productive classroom activitiesabout
the theoretical the overcomingnature of sharedof a physical conceptualinstrument mistakes
Montreal 2000 44
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueTask
To produce
a method a dialogueof construction according and its to Plato’sjustification model
Montreal 2000 45
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueInstrumental use
To use the compass Plato’s dialogue
to learn how to findpoints a squareat a given with a double distance area
Montreal 2000 46
The instrumental use of the compass
Montreal 2000 47
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueMediational useTo internalize
the activity the model with the physical of Socratic compass dialogue
to control one’s own behaviour
Montreal 2000 48
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueMediation takes place
when?In the collective discussion
AFTER BEFOREthe individual task
with the teacher’s guide
Montreal 2000 49
A closer lookat the two examples
Compass DialogueMediation takes place
how?With an essential role played by
IMITATIONof gestures of genreof words of structure
started, encouraged and explicitly required by the teacher
Montreal 2000 50
Nec manus nuda nec intellectus sibi permissus multum valet:
instruments et auxiliis res perficitur(Bacon: The New Organon …, 1690
quoted by Vygotskij and Lurija, 1930)
Neither the naked hand nor the understanding left to itself can effect much:
it is by instruments and aids that the work is done
Rembrandt
Montreal 2000 51
A question for the Working Group DDynamic geometry
Pointwise generation of loci
Continuous generation of curves
ANIMATION
Which epistemological
analysis?
Montreal 2000 52
A question for the Working Group A
Which kind of mathematics preparation for primary school
teachers if the aim is the approach to theoretical
knowledge?
Montreal 2000 53
A question for the Working Group C
Is the task of producing the Socratic dialogue
a problem that may (must) be solved by division?
Montreal 2000 54
A question for everybody
Have you ever tried
to (re)construct a Socratic dialogue
about a conceptual mistake of yours?
Try and becometeachers of yourselves!
Montreal 2000 55
A remind of some references on this collective project PME reports from 1993•first author: Arzarello, Bartolini, Boero, Garuti, Mariotti (et al.)•Mariotti et al., forum, PME 1997 (Lahti).•Arzarello, plenary, PME 2000 (Hiroshima) .Some other conferences•Bartolini, plenary, ICM98, Berlin, 1998•Mariotti, Mogetta & Maracci, NCTM presession, Chicago, 2000•Cerulli & Mariotti, Montreal, ITS 2000 (June)International Journals and volumes•Bartolini, ESM 96•Bartolini et al. ESM 99•Bartolini & Mariotti FLM 99•Mariotti, in English et al. (ed.), Handbook …, LEA (to appear)Book•Boero (ed.), Theorems in school, …, Kluwer, to appear