Top Banner
MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks
12

MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

Apr 01, 2015

Download

Documents

Jorge Perrell
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

MONTANA UPDATE

Mark Lere, Habitat BureauMontana Fish, Wildlife and Parks

Page 2: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

WHAT WE DON’T HAVE• SCREEN LAWS

• SCREEN SHOPS

• SPECIFIC FUNDING

(Mitchell Act)

• ANADROMOUS FISH

• NMFS OVERSIGHT

Page 3: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

WHAT WE DO HAVE

• SOME NEEDS!

A FEW EXAMPLES….

Page 4: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

UPPER BIG HOLE RIVER

• Home to the last fluvial arctic grayling population in the contiguous United States

• Has very robust Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances Program– One main goal of the CCAA

is to eliminate entrainment into irrigation systems

• Supports traditional agriculture – most rely on flood irrigation for hay crops, thus numerous diversions

Photo by Mark Conlin

Page 5: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

YELLOWSTONE RIVER

• Series of 6 low head diversion dams – Hinder or block upstream

fish passage for numerous warm water species of fish, including pallid sturgeon , paddlefish, sauger, blue sucker……….

– The diversions entrain lots of fish

Miles City

T & Y Diversion(Rm 20.4)

Map of the Yellowstone River, tributaries, and diversion dams with approximate river miles (Rm).

Page 6: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

INTAKE DIVERSION

• 1,300 cfs diversion• Passage barrier to

most fish species• Entrainment

estimates for Intake diversion range from 50,000 to 350,000 fish per month

• Recently screened, but passage remains a BIG issue

Page 7: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

BULL TROUT & CUTTHROAT TROUT• Losing native trout

species to entrainment• Losses commonly not well

quantified• Diversions typically have

not been prioritized • Most screen and

passage projects are opportunity based

• Federal strings occasionally drive projects

Page 8: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

NON-NATIVE SPORT FISH• Also have concerns about

entrainment of our non-native sport fish – Typically rainbow trout and

brown trout

Page 9: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

WHAT WE ARE DOING - SCREENS• Installed a variety of

screens– Infiltration galleries– Simple passive horizontal

screens– Passive inclined plane

screens– Turbulent fountains– FCA screens– Rotary drum screens– Vertical flat plate screens– Traveling belt screens

• Efforts not centralized• Not all meet NMFS criteria

Page 10: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

FISH SCREENS

• Scale of Screen Projects– From small to very large– A majority of our installed

screens are around 20 cfs or less.

Page 11: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

WHAT WE ARE DOING – FISH PASSAGE

• Many passage projects completed across the state– From projects for

our stronger swimming and jumping fish in the west

– To our weak swimming, non-jumping fish in the east

Page 12: MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

WHAT WE ARE DOING - BARRIERS• At times, it appears

that we have a split personality disorder

• Migration barriers are being used to isolate our native cutthroat trout from non-natives (rainbow trout, brook trout, and brown trout)