Modern pensions Conference Board Pensions Summit presentation Alex Mazer, Founding Partner April 13, 2016
Jan 22, 2017
Modern pensions Conference Board Pensions Summit presentation
Alex Mazer, Founding PartnerApril 13, 2016
Can pensions evolve?
2
Demand for retirement security is rising
3
Under-saving Health
Fiscal restraint Inequality
17% 50%TO
Post-pension financial products have disappointed
4
High fees
Marketing-driven
Members not first
Myth of choice
Financialization
5
Finance as a share of US GDP (%)
Source: Demos
The future of retirement: divergent paths
6
Employer pensionsModern pensions
Financial products
§ Member-focused§ Collective§ Low-cost§ Simple§ Accumulation + decumulation
§ Profit-driven§ Individualized§ High-cost§ Complex§ Accumulation-only
How pensions are usually defined
7
Regulatory category Plan design Institution
DB
DCvs
ERISAPBAPBSA
PRPP
Employer
Union
Public vs private sector
$ 1
Towards a functional definition
8
2
Singular focus
Members first
Contributions
Retirement security
Members
Others
Optimal sponsoring organizations
9
ScaleLongevity
Mandate
Principles underlying modern pensions
10
Single purpose: retirement security Simplicity
Lifetime approach Good governance
Minimize costs Fiduciary duty made real
Passive is usually betterTax and benefits
efficiency
Examples of modern pensions
11
Well-established
Starting up
The future? Unions
Governments
Associations
Pension funds
The good news: it’s not a moonshot
12
We’ve already got the parts
13
Sponsors Strong union, government, and association-sponsored plans.
Governance Much-admired governance models that work.
Investments New passive offerings. Active approaches that have added after-cost value.
Regulatory New plan types. More reformist governments.
From good to great
14
Decumulation Non-lump-sum products that are affordable and understandable
Alternatives Democratize access
Technology Simpler, cheaper administration
Regulation Nimble, integrated, pro-innovation
“Canadian model” Expand to private and third sectors