Mexicopresentationatwwemaapril212011 13125734424684-phpapp02-110805144547-phpapp02

• 1. Wastewater Situation and Opportunities in Mexico 2011 Vincent Lencioni WWEMA Washington Forum April 21, 2011

2. LGA Water Focus

• 15+ Years working with Wisconsin companies with products for Mexico public and private water sector

• • Market Analysis, Intermediary and Client Searches

• 3 years of formal & extensive regional water focus

• QuarterlyMexico Water Report

• Development of Mexican Water Intermediary contacts

• • Distributors, Reps, Integrators, EPCs, Consultants

• • Winners of Awards, Participants in Bids

• Interaction with Mexican federal and local water officials and intermediaries for early project information

• Monthly compilation & review of water bids & awards

• WWEMA Presentation, Global Committee, Latin America assistance

• Development of AWWA Manufacturers Committee, Mexico City

• Various presentations on Mexico water sector in the US & Mexico

3. Outline

• Mexico Economic Overview

• Mexico Water Challenges

• Wastewater Standards

• Municipal Wastewater Plants

• Industrial Wastewater Plants

• Wastewater Opportunities

• Annex

• Presentation Sources

4. I. Mexico/Latam Economic Growth S 5. I. Mexico Misconceptions

• Latin America is insignificant vs.Asia & US markets

• • US Market: Latam: 36%; Mexico/Brazil > 25%

• • • Mexico = 8-10% of US GDP and in general US Market

• • World Economies: Brazil #8; Mexico #15

• Mexico fell badly (2009), still on its knees

• • Mfg GDP since 2007: Up 2%; up 10% in 2010

• • GDP since 2007: Up 3.5%; 2011-12: Up 9%

• Brazil is much more dynamic/important than Mexico

• • Brazil GDP: 2x Mexico BUT Brazil Imports < Mexico

• • US Export Volumes and % of Total Exports (2010)

• • • Brazil = $558 Million; Mexico = over $2 Billion & 10% of total

6. I. US Exports to Mexico *2009 Crisis; 2010 Full Recovery*Mexican imports & exports up 35%21.8% -19.4% 3.1 2.5 3.1 Iron/Steel 13.3% -3.3% 3.3 2.9 3.0 Paper -3.9% 2.2% 4.4 4.6 4.5 Instruments 13.6% -13.7% 5.0 4.4 5.1 Chemicals 22.1% -12.1% 11.4 9.4 10.7 Plastics 84.8% -30.6% 14.2 7.7 11.1 Fuel/Oil 43.8% -27.9% 14.5 10.1 14.0 Vehicles 20.3% -6.8% 24.8 20.6 22.1 Inds Prods 32.2% -4.4% 31.5 23.8 24.9 Elec Prods 26.7% -14.7% 163.3 128.9 151.2 All Products 2010 2009 2010 2009 2008 % INCREASE TOTAL EXPORTS (Billion US) 7. I. Key Mexican Import Indicators

• Imports from US: Mexico vs BRIC

• • Total US Imports: BRIC 11.4%; Mexico 12.4%

• • US Import Increase: BRIC 33%; Mexico 32%

• Intermediary Products in Full Recovery

• • Capital Goods: 2006 figures; 2007 figures at year end

• Mexico Purchasing Power Up

• • Favorable, Appreciating Peso Exchange Rate

• Government Spending Positives

• • Pemex Income Up = 1/3 federal spending

• • Mexican budget & indicators = healthier than US

8. And the 800 pound Gorilla in the Room.. 9. I. Mexican Insecurity and Business

• Insecurity Situation

• • Govt vs Cartel struggle

• • • Right but tough fight

• • • Historic US cooperation

• • • Military & Police roles

• • Cartel vs Cartel struggle

• • • Drugs vs Crime (Zetas)

• • Victim Realities

• • • 35,000 murders since 2008

• • • Over 90% = Police or Cartels

• • Culture + Taxes = Impunity

• • • Crime, Kidnapping, Murders

• • North vs. South Blurr

• • • Expanding to other areas

• Business Perspective

• • Regional Dynamic

• • • North vs Rest; 3 Major Cities

• • Foreigners not targeted

• • • Kidnappings nor Murders

• • New companies staying away; already in Mexico are growing ( Control Risks Latin America)

• • • Maquiladora mfging up

• • • Volkswagon, BMW, WalMart

• • US Travel Advisory Context

• • • US government motherly role

• • Murders per capita reality

• • • See Following Table

10. I. Murders per Capita Context (2010)

• 50 WORST LATIN AMERICA COUNTRIES (ABOVE MEXICO), MEXICAN AND US STATES

• HONDURAS77 Oaxaca21 New Mexico8.7 Oklahoma6.2

• Chihuahua* 74 Sonora*20 Mexico City 8 Nuevo Leon# 6

• SALVADOR 70 Morelos19 Guanajuato 8 Tabasco 6

• Durango* 60 MEXICO18 Jalisco 8 Illinois 6

• VENEZUELA 48 Michoacan18 Maryland7.7 Georgia5.8

• Sinaloa* 47 Nayarit15 Tennessee7.3 Florida 5.5

• Guerrero 46 Quintana Roo 13 Puebla 7 Arziona5.4

• T&TOBAGO 37 Louisiana11.8 Alabama6.9 Texas5.4

• COLOMBIA 32 Chiapas10 Mississippi6.4 California5.3

• BRAZIL 25 Coahuila# 9 Missouri6.4 Pennsylv.5.2

• Wash D.C. 24 Mexico(State) 9 Michigan6.3 Queretaro 5

• Baja Calif* 24 Tamaulipas# 9 So Carolina6.3

• Puerto Rico 22.6 Colima 9 Arkansas6.2

1. Mexico better than Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, & Central America 2. Mexico business travel locations ( underlined ) similar to US locations 3. Problems in Northwest Mexico states(*) spike Mexico average badly; Northeast Texas border area states (#) much better than portrayed. 11. II. Mexico Water Overview 12. II. Mexico Water Issues & Challenges

• 1.Geographical Challenges : North/Central vs South dynamic; Altitude, precipitation, population, urban growth issues

• 2.Overexploited aquifers : 15% - all in the North/Central

• 3.Per Capita Water : 18,000 m3 (1950) to 4,400 m3 (2010)

• 4.Potable/Sewerage Coverage : Goals ok, rural low (79%/63%)

• 5.Metering : Domestic (obligatory, < 2/3) vs Industrial (0%)

• 6.Use of Water : 80% Agriculture (40% in US) = only 2% revenue

• 7.Delivery Systems : 50% loss in Potable and Agriculture Use

• 8.Wastewater Treatment : < 40% Municipal; < 20% Industrial

13. Increased Irrigation technology River Basin auto administration All rivers % lakes without trash All treated water reused Contamination sources under control Efficient regional order All industrial water treated Flood zones without habitations Urban suburbs connected to the network Disaster alert systems and prevention All rural areas with potable water Operating organisms functioningefficiently All municipal water treated II. 2030 Water Priorities River BasinEquilibrium Universal Water Coverage Habitable areas free from floods 100%CleanRivers 14. II. Mexico Water Goals: 2012 & 2012

• 5 Year Plan(2007-2012)

• • Potable water coverage: 92%

• • • Current: 91%

• • Sanitary/sewer coverage: 88%

• • • Current: 87%

• • Wastewater treatment: 60%

• • • Current: 40% (may be)

• • Rehabilitate 500 Dams

• • • Current: 420; 750 by 2030

• • 8% increase: utility efficiency

• • Improve Water Productivity in the Agricultural Sector

• • Better flood prevention actions

• 2030 Water Agenda

• • By 2016: all major urban areas free from risk of flood

• • By 2015, All Irrigation technified, 100% water reuse

• • 2024: Complete rural potable water and sewage access

• • 2025: All Industrial and Municipal wastewater treated

• • 2030: All aquifers and contamination in balance

• • From 64th in water infrastructure to between Panama (46) & Chile (35).

15. I. Municipal Treatment Evolution(2012 Goal and Historical Figures) # = 2010 Latin America Green City Index Average 52% vs Mexico 43.4% * = Collected, Treated, Increase = m3 per second;Increase = year to year treated60% 43.4%# 42.1% 40.2% 38.3% 35.0% 23.0% % Treated 40.8 3.1 4.5 4.3 4.9 7.3 4.9 Increase* 132 91.2 88.1 83.6 79.3 71.8 46 Treated* 220 2010 209 208 207 205 200 Collected* 2012 2010 2009 2008 2007 2005 2000 Year 16. III. Wastewater Standards 17. III. Mexican Wastewater Regulations

• Types of Regulations

• • By where water goes:

• • • NOM 001: Federal bodies

• • • • Rivers, Lakes, Coasts

• • • • All towns > 2500 inhabs (2600+) & all companies

• • • NOM 002: Municipal

• • • • Sewer/Drainage System

• • Discharge Rights Fees

• • • If NOM 001: Federal Fees

• • • If NOM 002: Local Fees

• • By Reuse

• • • NOM 003 = Water Reuse

• • • NOM 004 = Sludge/Mud

• System/Function

• • Measures metals, oils, tempurature, nitrogen

• • • BOD (DBO) = Urban

• • • COD (DQO) = Industrial

• • • TSS(SST)= Both

• • Based on post-treatment use: Agriculture, Public Use, Fauna

• • • Requirements vary by use

• • Sampling: Frequency, Self Enforcing

• • No Metering: 2011 Pilot Projects

18. III. NOM 001:Discharges into Federal Bodies M.A. = Monthly Average; D.A. = Daily Average (1)Instantaneous (2)Simple sample weighted average (3)Absent as per the Test Method defined in the NMX-AA-006. As of 2010, all companies & municipalites with 2500+ (3200 total) supposed to be compliant; Reality is much, much less, numbers unclear 19. III. NOM 001 (continued) (*) Measured in full. D.A. = Daily AverageM.A.= Monthly AverageNA = Not applicable (A) (B) and (C): Receiving Body type according to Government Service Charges Law. 20. III. NOM 002:Discharges into Municipal Systems As of 2010, all companies are supposed to be compliant 21. III. Wastewater Standards:US vs Mexico

• Significant differences between systems:

• • Standards Levels & Materials Tested

• • Samplying Frequencies

• • Metering Requirements

• • PreTreatment vs PostTreatment

• • Viable Regulations & Enforcement

• • • Local vs State vs Federal

• • Fines, Civil & Penal Liabilities, Closures

22. IV. Municipal Wastewater Plants 23. IV. Municipal Plants - Annual

• 2010: How Much/Where

• • 43.4% Waste Treated

• • • 200% increase since 1992

• • • 100% Increase since 2000

• • Treatment capacity need: 196m3 = 71m3 deficit

• • • 25% capacity increase since 2006

• • • Flow Increase: 5% annual

• • Treatment Areas

• • • North > 50% treatment

• • • Center: 33% treatment

• • • 48% Treatment in Ro Bravo/Lerma Basins

24. IV. Municipal Plants by State (2009) 25. IV. State Treatment Good & Bad:Refining Coverage & More Basic Needs

• Good: 10 States > 2/3

• • 100%: Nuevo Leon, Baja California, Aguascalientes

• • 75-65%: Guerrero, Nayarit, Chihuahua, Sinaloa, QR, Tamaulipas, Durango

• Evolutions (2003-2010)

• • Aguascalientes: 77 to 100%

• • Baja California: 72 to 100%

• • Chihuahua: 32 to 72%

• • San Luis Potosi: 22 to 63%

• • Tamaulipas: 37 to 65%

• • Sinaloa: 40 to 69.4%

• Positive but Reversals

• • Quintana Roo: 73 to 69%

• • Nayarit: 82.6% to 70.3%

• Bad: < 25% wastewater treatment coverage

• • < 10%: Yucatan, Campeche, Hidalgo

• • 14.4% Mexico City

• • 20-15%: Zacatecas, Tabasco, Morelos, Chiapas

• • 22.2% State of Mexico

• • 24.1% Jalisco

26. IV. State Wastewater: Good/Bad

• Which States are doing better than others

• • BOD (Oxygen Demand: Urban wastewater)

• • • Bad(> 30*): DF, Mexico, Guanajuato, Tlaxcala

• • • Good : Jalisco, NL, Tamps, VC, AGS, CHI, BC

• • COD(Chemicals: Industrial wastewater)

• • • Bad(> 40*): DF, Mexico, Jalisco, Guanajuato, Baja California, Aguascalientes, Chihuahua, Puebla, Tlaxcala

• • • Good : Nuevo Leon, Queretaro, Tamaulipas, Veracruz

• • TSS(Suspended Solids: Both, more urban)

• • • Bad(> 150*) only Hidalgo = result of DF/Mexico Wastewater

• • Overall Good :Campeche, Coahuila, Colima, Chiapas, Durango, Guerrero, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, San LuisPotos , Sinaloa Sonora ,Tabasco and Yucatan.

• • • • * Miligrams per liter

27. IV. Major Urban Wastewater:Projects, Coverage, Future Trends

• Mexico City

• • Atotonilco: 2013; Cost: $785 Million US

• • El Caracol: 2014; Cost: $130 Million US

• • • Area Coverage: < 15% in 2011; 40-60% in 2013/2014

• • • Capacity: 26m3 dry season; 38m3 wet season.

• Guadalajara

• • Agua Prieta: 2012; Cost: $280 Million US

• • El Ahogado: 2012: Cost: $150 Million US

• • • Area Coverage: < 25% in 2011; 100% in 2012

• • • Capacity: 11m3; ability to treat 10,000 liters/second each.

• Monterrey

• • No Major Projects but has 100% Coverage

• Medium Size/2nd Tier Cities: Next/Current Targets

• • 8 Cities: 2.5 to 1 million; 20 Cities > 750,000; 30 Cities > 500,000;45 Cities > 250,000; Over 60 Cities > 100,000 population.

28. IV. Type of Municipal Plants(2009 = 2029 plants) 29. IV. Public Treatment Challenges

• Cons Concerns but

• • Limited Federal Role

• • Few Sticks & Carrots

• • Bid Processes Bad

• • Corruption, 3 Year Municipal Elections

• • Rains, Altitude, Urban

• • Societal Acceptance and Low Water Reuse ( .1mm

• • • > 50% in Veracruz & Chiapas: Basic Treatment

• Secondar y: 1193 (54.6%)

• • • Removing colloidal & dissolved organice materials

• • • 57% in 4 states: Mexico, Veracruz, N.L., Hidalgo

• Tertiary : 88 (4%)

• • • Removing dissolved materials, driven by incentives

• • • 32 Mexico City/State of Mexico; up 25 a year

• Other : 174 (8%)

37. V. Industrial Treatment Challenges

• Cons Serious but...

• • Funding for Enforcement

• • Federal: Carrot/Incentives

• • • Growing but still limited

• • Federal: Stick/Enforcement

• • • Staff, Metering concerns

• • • Few Fines, Closures

• • Local: Rules & Enforcement

• • • Generic Vodka

• • Local: Politics/Corruption

• • • Limited Federal Role

• • Companies: Price-based, not reach for best or right solutions

• • Plants: 53% up since 2000 = half of Municipal Increase (99%)

• Pros Some good signs

• • Conagua Commitment Up

• • Municipal need for revenue

• • Water Reuse up (Over 5 Bm3)

• • Industrial Water Prices Up

• • Fines & Permits

• • • Costs and enforcement up

• • Targeting Problem Industries

• • • Prosanear Program Growing

• • Society & Tracking Responses

• • Funding & Legal Reform Up

• • New Metering Pilot Programs

• Writing on the Wall : When not if companies must comply.

38. VI. Wastewater Opportunities 39. VI. Municipal Opportunities

• Plants New & Rehabilitation

• • 2011 New: 50 Plants, another 50 expected: Rehab: 43% Plants ($225 million)

• • 2012 - Should be equal or better than 2011 Year before Presidential Elections

• • 2013 New Presidential Administration: considerable slow down / adjustments

• In Vogue Treatment Processes / Tendencies

• • 90% of Municipal Treatment in six categories:

• • • Sludge = 46% treatment (546 Plants); Stabilization Ponds = 16% treatment (707 Plants); Advanced Primary = 10% treatment (16 Plants); Aerated Ponds = 8% treatment (32 Plants); Dual Plants (10) & Biological Filters (97) = 10% treatment

• • • Plants with significant numbers but low treatment: RAFA/WASB (162), Wetlands (160)

• • New Plants and Plant Growth (2008 to 2009)

• • • 1. Biological Filters (55, up 100%+); 2. Aerated Ponds (up 33%);

• • • 3. Sludge (92, up 20%); 4. Wetlands (26, Up 20%)

• • Info on state preferences for treatment technology (see LGA Consulting website)

• • Problem Physical/Chemical used over Biological driven by upfront costs

• Medium Size/2nd Tier Cities: Next/Current Targets

• • 8 Cities: 2.5 to 1 million; 20 Cities > 750,000; 30 Cities > 500,000;45 Cities > 250,000; Over 60 Cities > 100,000 population.

40. VII. Mexico Wastewater Projects 2011-2012

• New ($850 Million)

• • Lake Xochimilco (3)

• • Lake Valsequillo (4)

• Rehab ($400 Million+)

• • Lake Chapala (7)

• • Chihuahua (40)

• • Colima (18)

• • Jalisco (28)

• • Sinaloa (20)

• • Tlaxcala (20)

• • Veracruz (18)

• • Tabasco (20)

• Feasibility Studies for Wastewater Plants (13)

• • Chiapas, Tabasco, Veracruz, Mexico City, Puebla, State of Mexico, Colima, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Sonora, Yucatan, Michoacan, Hidalgo

• Global Water Intelligence (9)

• • Valle del Bravo, Valley of Mexico, Caborca, El Conejo, El Zapotillo, Bahia de Banderas, Popotla, Tijuana, Monterrey VI

41. VI. Municipal Wastewater SectorMarket Size

• Estimated size as ranges of below models :$220-546 Million( Median: $357 Million )

• From 2011 Conagua Budget Elements

• • From Total 2011 Mexico Water Budget

• • • Conagua Budget: 49% Conagua, 51% others; Therefore x 1.5-2 = Total Market Size

• • • Conagua Projects = 48% ($1.53 Billion); 12% of Projects = Saneamiento: $183 Million

• • • Conagua Wastewater = 80% Saneamiento or $146 Million

• • • Total Municipal Wastewater (WW) Market (1.5-2x) $220-293 Million

• • From 2011 Saneamiento Budget Concept

• • • Saneamiento $189.8 Million x 80% = $152 million US

• • • Total Municipal WW Market (1.5-2x) = $228-300 Million

• • From 2011 Specific Conagua Wastewater-related Concepts

• • • 100% (S218) + 12% (K007+S074+S075) = $255 million

• • • Total Municipal WW Market (1.5-2x) = $382-500 Million

• From 2010 US Embassy Study on Mexico Water & Wastewater Imports

• • • $3.922 Billion; 66-80% Municipal = $2.9 Billion; 12% Saneamiento: $350 Million; 80% = $280 Million

• • • Total Municipal WW Market = $280 Million

• From 2008 Latin America Municipal Wastewater Equipment Study (Frost & Sullivan)

• • • Latin America Municipal Water:2008 : $43.1 Billon; Mexico = 27.5% or $11.85 Billion

• • • Total Municipal WW Market (See Formula Above: 48% x 12% x 80%) = $546 Million

42. VI. Problems for NAFTA Companies Selling to Mexican Government

• National Content Regulations

• • New (2010), Higher (65%), enforcement up

• • National Bid Issues

• • NAFTA Problems

• • US/Canada vs Mexico

• Result: Govt Bid Opportunities down

• • Mexico hypocritical?

• Licitation Problems

• • Compranet System

• • • Decisions already made

• • Opening/Closing dates

• • Cant find winners?

• • Low amounts reported vs. high amounts budgeted

• • • Where are projects?

• • • Lack of Transparency

• • • Local vs Conagua issue

43. VI. Channel Realities

• Private Sector Full Range of Options (B2B)

• • Pros & Cons: Distributor vs Rep vs Direct

• • Private Sector Intermediaries work in Public Sector?

• Public Sector Requirement despite NAFTA

• • National Bid Rules = Sales: Distributor or Subsidiary

• • • 99% of Bids National = Must sell through Mexican entity

• • National Content Rules = 55% now; 65% in 2012

• • • Increased need to work through Mexican integrators/EPCs

• • Local Bid (95%) Selling Environment

• • • Early bid knowledge, answering bid, servicing

• • • Sale will often be based on who you know

• • • Ability to steer clear of corruption problems

44. VI. Industrial Opportunities

• Commercial & IndustrialTraditional Wastewater

• • Types of Plants & Technologies

• • • Secondary Strong - Activated Sludge, Aeration Lagoons, Extended Aeration

• • • Tertiary low but growing (2009: 66 Plants; 2010: 88 Plants = 25 a year?)

• • • New vs. Refurbished (2011: over $225 million US)

• Industry Water Reuse & Savings

• • • Water reclamation, water capturing systems more important with industrial water price increases

• Infrastructure Projects

• • • Resorts: Hotels and Restaurants, Residential and Golf Courses

• • • • 100 New plants (2011-2014)

• • • Commercial: Malls, Industrial Parks, Hospitals, Restaurants, Hotels

• States & Cities with best enforcement reputations

• • • D.F., Monterrey, Chihuahua, Guanajuato, AGS, Queretaro

• • • 173 Cities participating in PROSANEAR Program

• Products: Domestic vs Imported(See Annex Sheet)

45. VI.IndustrialSectors Problems * = Expected Investment 2011-2012 ( US Embassy, Mexico City ) 4.Chemicals / Pharmaceuticals / Plastics- $120 million US* 4.Food & Beverage / Dairy- $90 million US* 3.Petroleum / Petrochemical (Pemex) Increasing investments in wastewater 3.Metalworking / Automotive Large & Growing, Tier 1 & 2 issues, OEM compliant 2.Textile / Clothing / Leather $70 million US*; many medium & small producers who are not compliant 2.Paper- $70 million US* -Highly regulated, improved Mfging processes, maintenance 1.Pork / Agriculture / Aquaculture Target area for enforcement, Conagua investment increases.Problems worse than expected 1. Sugar Requires regular,on-going investments even though meeting standards.High Frequency & Flow Priorities Top Priorities, heaviest polluters (2030) 46. VI. Industrial Wastewater Market

• Estimated Size as ranges of below models:$110-$350 Million ( Median: $285 Million )

• A.From 2005 Mexico Industrial Wastewater Equipment Study (US Embassy)

• • • $370M - Industrial Wastewater Equipment Only:2005 : $325 Million;2006 : $346 Million

• • • Pre-Economic Crisis Numbers could come close to approximating current market; 40% Large vs 60% Small/Medium

• • • Total Industrial Wastewater (WW) Market: $350 Million

• B.From Total Mexico Water & Wastewater Imports (2010) (US Embassy)

• • • Imports: $3.314B x Equipment (88%) x Industrial (20%) = $593 Million

• • • Estimated Wastewater %: LOW (33%): $221 Million;MEDIUM (50%): $336 Million ; HIGH (66%): $445 Million

• • • Total Industrial WW Market: $336 Million(5% Annual Growth figure for future estimates).

• C.From 2011 Conagua Budget (with Industrial = 50% of Municipal)

• • • *Total Market Municipal Wastewater Treatment = $220-293 Million; Industrial = 50% or

• • • Total Industrial WW Market: $110-150 Million

• D.From 2010 Latin America Industrial Wastewater Equipment (Frost & Sullivan)

• • • Latam:2011 : $1.12 Billion;2012 : $1.17 Billion;2014 : $1.27 Billion

• • • Mexico:(millions US$) 2011 2012 2014

• • • • Low (16.5%)185 195 210

• • • • Low-Medium (25%) 280 295 320

• • • • Medium (33.3%) 375 390 425

• • • Total Industrial WW Market: $280-375 Million

• ________________________________________________________________________________

• Estimated Size of both Industrial & Municipal Wastewater Markets> $500 Million

47. VI. Tips for Mexico Opportunities

• Get in/stay in, despite insecurity concerns

• • Demand Up : Economic Growth & Funding Up

• • • Water Sector: 70% Imported, 2/3 from the US

• • • Municipal : 2011 and 2012 up; 2013 down

• • • Industrial : Locate proactive states/cities: target companies

• Find in-country sales support..

• • Ideally: Sales Staff or Rep + Integrators

• • Distributors Viable in Private, not in Public

• but don`t rely solely on intemediaries for market analysis or business development

• Bring financing/credit plan: Private > Public

48. LGA Contact Information

• Vince Lencioni, General Manager

• Email:[email_address]

• Website:www.lgaconsulting.com

• Mexico Water Report Electronic Access :http://www.lgaconsulting.com/water/report.html

• Mexico City Toll Free Number in the US:

• 1-888-750-0988; or 011-52-555-378-3840 or 90

49. VII. Annex 50. VII. Domestic vs International ProductsImported Product Preference Both Domestic Product Preference GIS & SCADA Analyzers & Manometers Contractors & Construction Automation & Controls Equipment Filtration Equipmt & Products Pipe/Water Distribution Equipment Wastewater Reuse Equipment Treatment Plant SystemsSludge Handling Systems Treatment Plant Systems Tanks Gates & Flumes Data Management Systems* Leak Detection Metal Fabrication CIS & Meters Laboratory & Sampling Products Chemical Feed Equipment Well Drilling/Systems Process Equipment Aerators, Diffusers Corrosion & Cathodic Protection/Control Equipmt ChemicalsCompressors & Blowers Chlorine Desalination Equipment Disinfection Systems Coating & Lining Leak Detection Consulting* Sewer/Collection Systems & Equipment Laboratory & Sampling Equipment Pumps & Valves Traditional Treatment Options Rain Water Reclamation Storm/rain drainage Solutions 51. VII. Water Demand by Sector (2020) CONAGUA 2010: 77% Agriculture, 12% Public, 9% Industrial. 52. VII. Mexican Domestic & Industrial Water Prices 53. VII. Treatment by Basin Analysis Lerma = 25% of plants; Rio Bravo = 25% of Installed Capacity and Water Treated; using 75% of Installed Capacity, Need a lot more.No. Water Basin Number of Plants in Operation Installed Capacity(m3/s) Water Treated(m3/s) 54. VII. Treatment by Basin Analysis

• Municipal wastewater treated by 13 River Basins (Total = 100%) :

• 1.- Rio Bravo/Northern Border26.5%

• 2.- Lerma-Santiago-Pacfic21.5%

• 3.- Pacific North8.0%

• 4.- Valley of Mexico7.4%

• 5.- Penisula of Baja California7.3%

• 6.- Balsas6.5%

• 7.- Central Northern Basins4.8%

• 8.- Northeast4.0%

• 9.- Center Gulf3.7%

• 10.- Southern Border3.1%

• 11.- Gulf North2.7%

• 12.- Pacific South2.3%

• 13.- Pennsula of Yucatan2.0%

• Conclusions

• • Majority of Treatment in North (#1,3,5,7,8)

• • • Over 50% of all treatment

• • Significant Treatment in Center (#2,4,6)

• • • About 1/3 of rest

• • Insignificant treatment in south/gulf areas

• • • Less need for water, less industry and population

55. VII. Municipal Treatment Plants by Capacity (2010) 56. VII. Municipal Wastewater Treatment by State Analysis

• Majority of Plants in dry, northern states

• • Durango (167, 10%)

• • Sinaloa (136)

• • Chihuahua (119)

• Most important states: fewer plants

• • State of Mexico (105)

• • Jalisco (96)

• • Nuevo Leon (61)

• Installed Capacity

• • Nuevo Leon (12%)

• • Chihuahua (8%)

• • State of Mexico

• • Baja California

• • Federal District

• Treated Water

• • Nuevo Leon (14%)

• • Chihuahua (7%)

• • Baja California

• • State of Mexico

57. VIII. Presentation Sources

• AmericanChamberof Commerce,Mexico Charting the Economy ;2ndQuarter/2011

• Banco de Mxico,ndice de volumen de la produccin industrial, Series de tendencias .

• Business Monitor International,Latin America Monitor , May 2011 Editions

• Comisin Nacional de Agua (CONAGUA):PresupuestoFederal deEgresos(2009, 2010,2011)

• Comisin Nacional de Agua (CONAGUA): Situacin del Subsector del Agua y Saneamiento 2009

• Comisin Nacional de Agua (CONAGUA): Situacin del Subsector del Agua y Saneamiento 2010

• Comisin Nacional de Agua (CONAGUA): Estadsticas del Agua 2011

• Economy Watch:Economic Statics & Economic Indicators Data Base for 2012 .

• Global Trade Information Services,US Export Statistics United States Exports To Mexico ;United States Exports to Brazil , March 2011.

58. VIII. Presentation Sources

• Gobierno Federal Mexicana,Ley Federal De Derechos , 2010

• Interviews with different Conagua and EPA officials.

• Media Analytics,Global Water Intelligence , January and February 2011 editions

• Semarnat,Normas Oficiales Mexicanas: NOM 001-1996, 002-1996, 003-1997 , 2009

• Semarnat,Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM 004-2002 , 2002.

• U.S. Commercial Service Report:Mexico Equipment and Services for Upgrading Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants . September 2010.

• U.S. Commercial Service Report:Mexico Water and Wastewater Equipment and Services Industry . September 2010.

• Wikipedia,List of countries by international homicide rate 2010; US State source:http:// www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/State/StatebyState.cfm

• Mexico State source:http://www.prominix.com/sblock/admin/images/Mexico%20Crime%20Stats%202010.pdf