METRICS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN July 2011
Mar 29, 2015
METRICS
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN
July 2011
STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
1. Maximize learning2. Increase collaborative opportunities3. Build the capacity for continuous improvement4. Close gaps and reduce inequities5. Advocate for public education6. Foster communication and engagement
2
MAXIMIZE LEARNINGGOAL 1.1
• Raise Oakland County students’ participation and achievement in pre-K-12 and post-secondary education by meeting the needs of students with diverse backgrounds and educational goals.
3
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.1
• The percent of students who meet standards on pre-K-12 standardized tests that are used county-wide (for example, MEAP, MME, ACT, CFE certification exams, etc.) will improve.
4
Oakland County reading performance has been flat over the past six years and math results have steadily improved. The Learning Achievement Coalition - Oakland (LAC-O) has goals aimed at improving both literacy and math achievement.
MEAP Reading and Math
Oakland County MEAP Results Grades 3-8 Combined
86.388.4
86.6 87.090.2
88.2
81.183.2
85.488.1 89.4 90.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
Reading Math
Perc
en
t P
rofi
cie
nt
Oakland County
5
MEAP Reading – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year. Fall 2010 scores were down in each grade compared to Fall 2009 Reading scores.
MEAP Reading Grades 3-8 2005-06 - 2010-11
91 92 91 9194
90 90 90 9088 90 89 88
9188 89
91 90
8688 88 86
9288
8486
80
86 8785
8083 83 82
8987
4 5 5 5 4 37
5 6 5 6 58 7 6 7 6 5 6 5 6 5
4 48 6
86 5 6 7 7 6 6 6 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Reading
Perc
en
t M
et
Oakland County Michigan Oakland - MI
6
MEAP Math – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year. Fall 2010 math scores were up slightly in five grades and down a bit in 4th grade.
MEAP Math Grades 3-8 2005-06 - 2010-11
92 93 95 9597 97
90 91 92 9296 95
84 86 84 86 87 88
7778
8286
88 89
7275
81
88 89 90
7377
8082
80
84
5 5 5 42 2
86 6 4 4 4
11 10 10 9 8 812
9 96 6 5
12 118
57
5
10 9 8 710
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Math
Per
cen
t M
et
Oakland County Michigan Oakland - MI
7
MEAP Writing – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year, and have been trending up, especially in 7th grade.
MEAP Writing Grades 4 & 7 2005-06 - 2010-11
65
56 57 55
60
7673
8285
58
10 11 1311
139 8
5 710
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
4th 7th
Writing
Per
cen
t M
et
Oakland County Michigan Oakland County - Michigan
Fall 2010 Writing is not directly comparable to previous writing assessments. 8
MEAP Science – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have been maintaining at the same level.
MEAP Science Grades 5 & 8 2005-06 - 2010-11
85
90 88 8987 86
83 8185
83 83 84
8 7 6 63
86 6 6 7 7 6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
5th 8th
Science
Per
cen
t M
et
Oakland County Michigan Oakland County - Michigan
9
MEAP Social Studies – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have been level over time.
MEAP Social Studies Grades 6 & 9 2005-06 - 2010-11
8582 82 81 82 82
80 7977 79 79 80
7 8 97
9 75 5 6 7 8 7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
6th 9th
Social Studies
Per
cen
t M
et
Oakland County Michigan Oakland County - Michigan
10
MME – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have trended up in reading, stayed about the same in math, science and writing, and have trended down in social studies.
MME Spring 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 11th Grade Results
6668 67
71
52 5155 53
5554
57 58
63 63 64 64
8683
8582
6062
60
65
40 4143 44
46 4649 50
56 57 5658
8380 81
79
6 6 7 6
1210
129 9
8 8 8 7 68
63 3 4 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
07 08 09 10 07 08 09 10 07 08 09 10 07 08 09 10 07 08 09 10
Reading Writing Math Science Social Studies
Per
cen
t M
et
Oakland Michigan Oakland - Michigan
11
Oakland County ACT results from 2007 to 2010 have trended up slightly.
ACT Spring 2007, 2008, 2009 & 2010 11th Grade Results
19.2
20.0 20.020.3
19.0
20.0
19.0
20.119.8
20.4
18.8
20.019.7
20.520.2
20.5
19.4
20.3
19.8
20.620.3
20.7
19.3
20.5
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
ACT English ACT Mathematics ACT Reading ACT Science ACT English Writing ACT Composite
Mea
n S
cale
Sco
re
Oakland 07 Oakland 08 Oakland 09 Oakland 10
12
Number of students earning technical certificates for each cluster at eachof the four Oakland Schools Technical Campuses.
NE NW SE SW NE NW SE SW NE NW SE SW NE NW SE SWBioTechnology &
Environmental Science 47 34 45 115 41 19 0 2 27 0 162 77 91Business, Management,
Marketing, and Technology 54 49 47 49 2 27 44 26 2 37 155 129 58 113 246 204
Construction Technology 11 55 44 14 44 55 0 0 25 99 99 0
Culinary Arts/Hospitality 35 74 35 59 18 22 23 24 0 17 0 38 53 113 58 121Engineering/
Emerging Technologies 0 96 1 62 0 0 1 69 0 0 0 8 0 96 2 139
Health Sciences 29 16 116 85 0 31 68 6 85 53 0 216 114 100 184 307Human Services:
Cosmetology 0 0 0 0
Transportation Technology 0 45 52 91 0 75 50 179 0 0 0 40 0 120 102 310
Visual Imaging Technology 44 17 36 47 3 24 7 6 0 0 98 26 60Total 129 426 346 427 34 361 285 347 87 114 163 458 250 901 794 1232
09-10 Regional Totals
08-09 Regional Totals
07-08 Regional Totals
% Change from 07-08 30% -11% 8%9%
1360 868 768 2996
1218 791 923 2932
1328 1027 822 3177
TotalInstructional Cluster
CoreCertificate
Technical Certificate
National Skill Certification
13
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.1
• Four, five and six-year high school graduation rates will improve.
14
The Oakland County graduation rate has been four to six percentage points above the Michigan rate for the classes of 2007 through the class of 2010.
Graduation Rate 1998 - 2010
86 85 8789
91 9193 93
90
82 8179 80
8381
80 81
86 8589 88
86
75 76 75 76
2 47 9
5 64 5 5 6 6 4 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Class of ....
Perc
en
t G
rad
uati
ng
Oakland Michigan Oakland - Michigan
4 Year Cohort Method
15
Oakland County Special Education students’ graduation rate exceeds that of Michigan each year.
Students with Disabilities Graduation Rate 2001 - 2010
50
56
65
7679
73
69 6764 64
50 5155
6770 69
6158 57 59
0
5
10 9 9
48
96 6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Class of ....
Per
cen
t G
rad
uat
ing
Oakland Michigan Oakland - Michigan
4 Year Cohort Method
16
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.1
• The percent of exiting students planning to enter post-secondary education or training will increase.
17
About 90% of Oakland County 10th grade students intend to pursue post-high school studies.
Percent of 10th grade students planning Post HS Education/Training
87.8 88.7 89.2 89.8
.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2006-07 (13,598) 2007-08 (11,076) 2008-09 (13,190) 2009-10 (12777)
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
Rep
ort
ing
18
In 2009-10 among Oakland County 10th graders, 37% plan to attend four year colleges and 41% plan postgraduate studies.
Educational Plans of 10th Grade Students in Oakland County 06-07 - 09-10
8.3
2.9
.2
.8
1.9
1.2
3.4
4.6
38.5
38.3
8.0
2.4
.2
.7
1.8
.9
2.5
4.7
38.9
39.9
8.1
2.0
.2
.5
2.0
.9
2.9
4.8
38.4
40.3
7.5
2.1
.2
.5
2.4
1.0
2.8
4.8
37.4
41.4
.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
Undecided about future ed plans
Other
Not finish HS
No ed after HS
Job related training through military
Apprenticeship - on-the-job-training
Career-Technical School
2 year career-community college
4 year college
Graduate-Professional studies after 4years of college
Percent of Students
2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-2010
19
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.1
• The percent of students who have completed post-secondary education or training five years after high school graduation will increase.
20
In order to assess this goal, districts will need to conduct follow-up surveysof their graduates five or six years after graduation. In order to create countywide summaries, some parts of their surveys would need to be consistent. If these data are to be collected, each district would have to agree to participate.
Example of key information that might help monitor progress on this metric:
21
MAXIMIZE LEARNINGGOAL 1.2
• Improve the positive, constructive conditions for learning that support diverse students with varying learning styles and cultural backgrounds in all buildings and classrooms in Oakland County.
22
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.2
• The percent of schools that report they have implemented the Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System (MISAAS) performance indicators for positive school culture and climate for learning will increase.
23
94% of schools using the School Improvement Framework report they have created an environment conducive to learning. SIF 1.2.B.3: ...all teachers will design lessons and assessments that engage their students.
2%5%
43%
50%
1% 2%
36%
61%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Getting Started Partially Implemented Implemented Exemplary
Degree of Implementation
Per
cen
t o
f S
cho
ols
2009-10 (107) 2010-11 (101)
24
95% of schools using the AdvancEd Standards report they have created an environment conducive to learning.
Standard 3.9: The school monitors school climate and takes appropriate steps to ensure that it is condusive to student learning.
0%
6%
27%
67%
0%
5%
27%
68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Not Evident Emerging Operational Highly Functional
Level of Practice
Per
cen
t o
f S
cho
ols
2009-10 (235) 2010-11 (213)
25
METRICS FOR GOAL 1.2
• The percent of students who report that positive, constructive conditions for learning exist in their classrooms will improve.
26
LAC-O has a goal to improve the relationships between students and teachers. A survey was administered to representative samples of 2,500 8th grade students during the 2009-10 school year. 72% of students reported they had positive relationships with their teachers.
Student Reported Relationship With Their Teacher
4.3
23.4
49.2
23.1
.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
0-13 (0 - 25%) 14-27 (26-50%) 28-41 (51-75%) 42-54 (76-100%)
Percent of Positive Responses to a 54 Item Survey
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
ents
2009-10
27
INCREASE COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITIES
GOAL 2.1• Expand the technological, educational and
resource infrastructure for anywhere, anytime teaching, learning, collaboration, and communication.
28
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.1
• The technical infrastructure availability will be maintained at 99.9% and available to all districts, teachers, students, and staff.
29
30
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.1
• District participation in the use of Oakland Schools’ hosted resources will increase.
31
LEA participation in Oakland Schools hosted services is steadily increasing.
LEA Participation in OS Hosted Services
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
Busi
ness
(AM
S)
Stud
ent
(Zan
gle)
Zang
le L
ite
ON
E
AES
OP
(sub
cal
ling)
Gen
eral
ASP
(app
trk
g)
NO
N-P
UB
MSD
S
Info
rm
Tech
nica
l Con
sulti
ng(lo
ng t
erm
)
Barr
acud
a (S
PAM
filte
ring
)
Nov
aNet
Atl
as R
ubic
on
Moo
dle
Folle
t Li
brar
y M
gt
Serv
er H
osti
ng
Hosted Service
Num
ber
of L
EAs
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
32
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.1
• Countywide participation in hosted services will increase cost-savings for LEAs.
33
Technology Services savings to districts rose from $3.6 million in 2008-09 to $3.9 million in 2009-10.
Districts Save Money with Technology Services
$56
$52
$60 $1
28
$429
$1,0
00
$57
$1,2
60
$56
$78
$96 $1
44
$515
$600
$852
$1,2
60
$20 $5
6 $95
$96 $1
44
$515
$600
$966
$1,2
60
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
ON
E S
ubsi
dy
ON
E N
etw
ork
Long
Ter
m T
ech
Sup
port
Bus
ines
s A
ppS
uppo
rt
Bar
racu
da S
PA
Mfil
terin
g
AM
S B
usin
ess,
Fin
ance
& H
R
Pea
rson
Ben
chm
ark/
Info
rmS
ubsi
dy
Zan
gle
Sup
port
Inte
rnet
Ser
vice
Pro
vide
r
Do
llar
s S
aved
(in
$10
00)
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
34
INCREASE COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITIES
GOAL 2.2• Increase opportunities to standardize, centralize
or regionalize district operations and instructional services that result in resource efficiencies and overall cost-savings.
35
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.2
• How many districts, offices or staff engaged in standardization, centralization or regionalization?
36
1,319 students in 28 LEAs participated in the Oakland SchoolsHomeless Student Education Programin 2009-10
District 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
Avondale 6 12 14 10 4
Berkley 2 11 3 7 18
Birmingham 4 20 9 13 33
Bloomfield 7 6 1 3 14
Brandon 3 13 9 4 20
Clarenceville 5 10 14 9 25
Clarkston 6 11 12 8 9
Clawson 9 15 9 8 27
Farmington 14 9 40 36 36
Ferndale 29 46 42 80 46
Hazel Park 24 25 22 27 38
Holly 37 44 27 52 40
Huron Valley 18 51 40 60 88
Lake Orion 21 22 28 36 64
Lamphere 7 13 6 11 11
Madison 3 17 11 12 28
Novi 28 46 43 42 25
Oak Park 21 28 31 47 86
Oxford 6 15 9 8 23
Pontiac 563 459 201 120 117
Rochester 16 27 35 28 25
Royal Oak 101 129 77 48 58
South Lyon 34 28 43 61 85
Southfield 121 107 161 153 210
Troy 11 16 17 19 23
Walled Lake 25 18 36 29 40
Waterford 40 36 68 73 119West Bloomfield 8 6 3 4 7Total 1,169 1,240 1,011 1,008 1,319
Homeless Student Education Program Students Served
37
The Foundation Allowance for the 1,511 students served by Oakland Schools Homeless Program translates into over $13,000,000 in revenue to Oakland districts.
38
District 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
Avondale 8 15 9 10 12
Berkley 3 8 0 2 2
Birmingham 0 2 1 1 0
Bloomfield 0 0 0 0 0
Brandon 0 5 2 3 8
Clarenceville 1 6 5 0 0
Clarkston 2 9 7 3 6
Clawson 0 6 0 0 0
Farmington 2 12 8 6 1
Ferndale 14 17 14 17 10
Hazel Park 25 18 29 20 13
Holly 14 18 6 7 10
Huron Valley 31 23 18 22 0
Lake Orion 16 7 0 2 2
Lamphere 2 1 0 0 0
Madison 2 13 10 12 9
Novi 2 2 0 7 3
Oak Park 17 13 11 7 2
Oxford 12 16 4 3 2
Pontiac 52 37 66 72 75
Rochester 15 21 12 7 6
Royal Oak 17 18 5 7 5
South Lyon 12 23 16 29 20
Southfield 1 11 10 6 12
Troy 4 5 7 7 7
Walled Lake 12 19 9 1 3
Waterford 6 24 22 9 9West Bloomfield - 0 5 2 13Total 270 349 276 262 230
Wraparound Students Served230 Students in 23 LEAs were served by the Oakland SchoolsWraparound Programin 2009-10
39
The Foundation Allowance for the 117 students served by Oakland County Wraparound Program and 25 students in Pregnant and Parenting Teen Wraparound program translates into over $1,000,000 in revenue to Oakland County districts.
Oakland County Wraparound
40
Oakland Schools’ Truancy Team has handled more than 1,000 cases in each of the last three years and served 1,242 middle school students in its Back to School Program in 2009-10.
41
Value to districts of Truancy Team's Work
$575
$1,215
$1,630
$2,983
$2,573 $2,560
$685
$1,042 $1,007
$1,345$1,242
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2 2009-10 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2 2009-10
Truancy Cases Back to School Students
Val
ue
to D
istr
icts
(in
$1,
000)
The Truancy Team provided $3.8 million of services to Oakland County LEAs in 2009-10.
Truancy cases are valued at $2,500 & Back to School at $1,000 42
The Oakland County JobLink Service Center served over 1,000 youth in 2010.
Workforce Investment Act Youth Participation
498
655
1029 1023
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2007 2008 2009 2010
JobLink Service Center
Nu
mb
er o
f P
arti
cip
ants
Number of Participants
43
PLUS Club Service Levels(Partnering for Lasting Upward Success)
31
57
64
80
25
4139 40
24
3937 36
24
3937 36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
PLUS Club Seniors Graduates Post-Secondary
Nu
mb
er o
f P
arti
cip
ants
Number of Participants
Partnering for Lasting Upward Success (PLUS) serves in-school youth.
44
26 Districts & the Oakland Schools Technical Campuses are using Pearson Inform to analyze data about student achievement.
Teachers & administrators loggeda total of 29,000 hours in the toolthrough the first quarter of 2011.
District2010 3rd Quarter
2010 4th Quarter
2011 1st Quarter
Avondale 96 311 591Berkley 17 41 126Birmingham 243 416 596Bloomfield Hills 26 202 599Brandon 32 124 41Clarenceville 25 20 14Clarkston 331 490 450Clawson 4 17 101Farmington 553 1601 1353Ferndale 124 101 208Hazel Park 5 53 68Holly 113 280 324Huron Valley 304 1215 1707Lake Orion 209 357 2535Lamphere 26 116 278Madison 5 2 42Novi 143 155 202Oak Park 0 7 13CFE 43 32 23Oxford 10 31 104Pontiac 17 32 245Rochester 278 1725 3114Royal Oak 44 166 293South Lyon 1272 996 2450Southfield 108 146 316Troy 46 302 212West Bloomfield 24 44 34Total Hours 4099 8983 16041 29123
Total Hours Logged in Pearson Inform
Grand Total
27 districts and 27 non-public schools participated in theMichigan Green Schools Program in 2010-11
46
18 districts participated in the Oakland Human Resources Consortium (OHRC), a consortium of Oakland County school districts dedicated to the recruitment, selection, employment, and professional growth of quality educators and other school district employees.
47
26 of the 28 LEAs used Production Printing & Graphics in 2009-10.
48
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.2
• Dollars saved through standardization, centralization and/or regionalization.
49
• In 2009-10, savings and enhancements brought Oakland County districts approximately $73,150,000.
SUPPORT SERVICES
INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES
DIRECT SERVICES TO STUDENTS, STAFF AND DISTRICTS
District Service Report
50
METRICS FOR GOAL 2.2
• There will be an increase in the number of education/business/agency/community partnership projects (including grants) that produce improved outcomes for participants.
51
GRANTS BROUGHT IN $113,662,752
IN FY10
• General Fund - $5,774,825• Special Education Fund - $57,540,330• Vocational Education Fund - $1,820,996• Other - $48,526,601 (includes JobLink and one-
time ARRA grants of $1.7M)
52
BUILD CAPACITY FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
GOAL 3.1• Increase the skills, knowledge and attitudes
within districts and schools that improve their capacity to operate more efficiently and effectively.
53
METRICS FOR GOAL 3.1
• Increase the percent of schools with improvement plans that meet state requirements.
54
ALL OAKLAND COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUBMIT THEIR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
PLANS ONLINE
• The State of Michigan now requires that public schools submit their School Improvement Plans online.
• 100% of Oakland County schools submit their School Improvement plans.
55
METRICS FOR GOAL 3.1.2
• Increase direct support to schools and districts for sustained success.
56
Professional learning opportunities specifically intended to develop leadershipabound.
Page 1 of 357
Professional learning opportunities specifically intended to develop leadership abound.
Page 2 of 358
Professional learning opportunities specifically intended to develop leadership abound.
Page 3 of 359
METRICS FOR GOAL 3.1.3
• Increase the percent of people who participate in Oakland Schools-sponsored professional development or consultation.
60
The number of participantsin PD for individual districtsremained at about 21,000 in2008-09 and 2009-10.
61
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
• In addition to the 31,459 participants who attended 1,385 events in 2009-2010, an additional 23,061 participants attended 679 more events (these participants attended other countywide and multi-district professional development events in which they were not identified by individual district).
62
The number of participants in professional development for multiple districts was about 10,000 in 2009-10, down from about 12,000 in 2008-09.
Please note that these datarepresent only those programs that were offered to all districts. PD deliveredto a single district is reported in metric 3.1.2.
63
Instructional Servicesconsultants logged12,433 hours of consultation with districts and 4,971 points of contact during the 2009-10 school year. The number of contacts is almost identical to the previous year and the hours of consultation were up almost 50%.
Points of Assistance
Hours of Assistance
Points of Assistance
Hours of Assistance
Points of Assistance
Hours of Assistance
Avondale 111 182.8 93 133.5 103 212.5Berkley 148 275.8 125 175.5 181 327.6Birmingham 252 425.3 333 466.0 240 383.9Bloomfield Hills 179 312.8 145 151.5 180 264.7Brandon 73 139.8 75 121.3 94 138.7Clarenceville 90 213.8 73 153.0 96 202.6Clarkston 200 365.8 199 295.3 158 207.7Clawson 86 141.3 122 240.5 109 206.7Farmington 166 273.5 228 358.5 248 456.7Ferndale 282 750.5 269 578.3 148 310.9Hazel Park 123 359.0 113 172.0 70 150.3Holly 81 184.5 84 162.3 97 207.3Huron Valley 143 309.3 102 127.5 189 440.0Lake Orion 142 282.3 189 316.5 182 412.7Lamphere 162 343.5 105 116.5 112 161.5Madison 250 549.0 111 184.3 78 98.8Novi 65 154.0 79 105.8 119 238.2Oak Park 275 779.0 261 563.3 318 1,313.7Oxford 87 210.5 130 245.3 114 244.5Pontiac 826 2,067.5 647 1,467.5 649 3,872.7Rochester 244 422.5 334 583.0 291 488.8Royal Oak 126 198.0 147 160.3 188 322.8South Lyon 89 114.8 86 112.8 144 185.8Southfield 241 474.0 203 312.5 187 375.0Troy 208 325.3 152 235.8 204 355.2Walled Lake 191 270.5 184 239.5 160 294.1Waterford 211 429.0 252 429.8 197 372.9West Bloomfield 125 262.0 134 168.3 115 187.9TOTAL 5,176 10,815.5 4,975 8,375.8 4,971 12,433.4
2009-2010
Instructional Services Assistance
2007-2008 2008-2009
64
CLOSE GAPS AND REDUCE INEQUITIESGOAL 4.1
• Close the gaps between groups of students in achieving state learning standards.
65
METRICS FOR GOAL 4.1
• There will be a decrease in the difference between the percent of African American, Hispanic, students eligible for free or reduced price lunch, English Language Learners and special education students who meet state learning standards as measured by statewide assessments and the percent of all students who meet state standards.
• To learn more about the Learning Achievement Coalition-Oakland, visit www.lac-o.org.
66
The Learning Achievement Coalition of Oakland (LAC-O) is working toward the goal of reducing the achievement gaps for African American students. The gap has narrowed for math and reading.
2005-06 - 2009-10 MEAP Math & Reading 3-8 Combined for African American Students
5862 64
71 74 7175
69 71
7881 83 85
88 8986 88 87 87
90
-23 -21 -21-17 -16 -15 -14
-17 -16-12
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06(13288)
2006-07(13216)
2007-08(13182)
2008-09(13327)
2009-10(13139)
2005-06(13297)
2006-07(13206)
2007-08(13117)
2008-09(13305)
2009-10(13116)
Mathematics Reading
Year (Number of Students in Group)
Per
cen
t P
rofi
cien
t
African American Students All Students (79,373) Gap
67
The gaps have not changed substantially in either subject area at grade 11.
2007-2010 MME 11th Grade Results for African American Students
18 1520 21
37 39 3843
55 5457 58
66 68 6771
-38 -38 -37 -37
-29 -29 -28 -27
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
Math Reading
Subject Area & Year
Per
cen
t M
et (
Gap
in
% M
et)
African American (2873) All Students (14180) Gap
(Number of students group for 2010 Math)
68
Oakland Schools is working toward the goal of reducing the achievement gaps for Hispanic students. The gap has narrowed for math and reading.
2005-06 - 2009-10 MEAP Math & Reading 3-8 Combined for Hispanic Students
6469
7477
81
7176
73 747981 83 85
88 8986 88 87 87
90
-17 -15-12 -11
-9
-15 -13 -14 -13 -11
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06(2341)
2006-07(2238)
2007-08(2468)
2008-09(2554)
2009-10(2473)
2005-06(2252)
2006-07(2183)
2007-08(2401)
2008-09(2495)
2009-10(2434)
Mathematics Reading
Year (Number of Students in Group)
Per
cen
t P
rofi
cien
t
Hispanic Students All Students (79,373) Gap
69
The gaps have narrowed in both subject areas at grade 11.
2007-2010 MME 11th Grade Results for Hispanic Students
3134
39 4045 48
535755 54
57 58
66 68 6771
-25-19 -18 -18
-21 -20
-14 -14
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
Math Reading
Subject Area & Year
Per
cen
t M
et (
Gap
in
% M
et)
Hispanic (290) All Students (14180) Gap
(Number of students group for 2010 Math)
70
The Learning Achievement Coalition of Oakland (LAC-O) is working toward the goal of reducing the achievement gaps for students eligible for free orreduced price lunch. The gap has narrowed for math and reading.
2005-06 - 2009-10 MEAP Math & Reading 3-8 Combined for Students Eligible for Free or Reduced Price Lunch
6164
6873
78
7074
71 71
8081 83 8588 89
86 88 87 8790
-20 -19 -18-15
-11-16 -14 -16 -16
-11
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06(15036)
2006-07(16814)
2007-08(17954)
2008-09(19205)
2009-10(22301)
2005-06(14892)
2006-07(16693)
2007-08(17786)
2008-09(18983)
2009-10(22061)
Mathematics Reading
Year (Number of Students in Group)
Pe
rce
nt
Pro
ficie
nt
Economically Disadvantaged Students All Students (79,373) Gap
71
The gaps have narrowed slightly in both subject areas at grade 11.2007-2010 MME 11th Grade Results for Economically Disadvantaged Students
23 2426
29
3943 41
48
55 5457 58
66 68 6771
-32 -30 -31 -29 -27 -25 -25 -23
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
Math Reading
Subject Area & Year
Per
cen
t M
et (
Gap
in
% M
et)
E.D. (3278) All Students (14180) Gap
(Number of students in group for 2010 Math)
72
Oakland Schools is working toward the goal of reducing the achievement gaps for English language learners. The gap has not changed for math and narrowed after increasing for reading.
2005-06 - 2009-10 MEAP Math & Reading 3-8 Combined for English Language Learners
74 75 7779
83
73 73
6669
7781 83 85
88 8986 88 87 87
90
-7 -8 -9 -9 -7
-13 -15-20 -18
-13
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06(4640)
2006-07(3968)
2007-08(4001)
2008-09(4207)
2009-10(6536)
2005-06(4274)
2006-07(3636)
2007-08(3660)
2008-09(3801)
2009-10(6238)
Mathematics Reading
Year (Number of Students in Group)
Perc
en
t P
rofi
cie
nt
Eng. Lang. Learners All Students (79,373) Gap
73
The gap has widened for math and has not changed for reading at grade 11.
2007-2010 MME 11th Grade Results for English Language Learners
27 2932
2420
24 22 24
55 5457 58
66 68 6771
-29-25 -25
-34
-46 -44 -45 -47
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
Math Reading
Subject Area & Year
Per
cen
t M
et (
Gap
in
% M
et)
E.L.L. (310) All Students (14180) Gap
(Number of students group for 2010 Math)
74
The Learning Achievement Coalition (LAC-O) of Oakland is working toward the goal of reducing the achievement gaps for students with individual education plans (IEPs). The gap has narrowed for math and reading.
2005-06 - 2009-10 MEAP Math & Reading 3-8 Combined for Students with IEPs
5155
5762
69
5659 57 57
66
81 83 8588 89
86 88 87 8790
-30 -29 -28 -26-21
-31 -29 -29 -30-24
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005-06(8045)
2006-07(8448)
2007-08(8310)
2008-09(8345)
2009-10(8137)
2005-06(7893)
2006-07(8276)
2007-08(8140)
2008-09(8208)
2009-10(7946)
Mathematics Reading
Year (Number of Students in Group)
Perc
en
t P
rofi
cie
nt
with IEP All Students (79,373) Gap
75
The gap for math has widened slightly but has not changed for reading atgrade 11.
2007-2010 MME 11th Grade Results for Students With Individual Educational Plans
15 14 15 14
2629
32 31
55 5457 58
66 68 6771
-40 -40 -42 -44-40 -39
-34-40
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2007 2008 2009 2010
Math Reading
Subject Area & Year
Per
cen
t M
et (
Gap
in
% M
et)
with IEP (1161) All Students (14180) Gap
(Number of students in group for 2010 Math)
76
LAC-O has a goal aimed at increasing the percent of 9th grade students who have successfully completed Algebra I. The gaps between groups of students in Algebra I are very similar to the MEAP and MME gaps.
Algebra I "PASSING" RATES for Classes of 2011 - 2013
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Group of Students
Per
cen
t o
f S
tud
en
ts
Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
Class of 2011 65% 44% 82% 46% 72% 45% 68% 27% 68% 89% 62% 69% 62%
Class of 2012 70% 48% 91% 49% 75% 49% 73% 29% 73% 73% 67% 74% 65%
Class of 2013 74% 58% 88% 72% 77% 63% 79% 39% 76% 69% 71% 78% 71%
AllAfrica
n Ameri
AsianHispa
nicWhite
Econ Disadv
Not E. D.
With IEPs
w/o IEPs
Eng Lang Learn
Native Eng
Speak
Female
Male
77
CLOSE GAPS AND REDUCE INEQUITIESGOAL 4.2
• Improve allocation of human and financial resources in ways that meet the instructional needs of individual schools, districts and service areas.
78
METRICS FOR GOAL 4.2
• The distribution of instructional resources will be based on data reflecting the unique needs of schools and districts.
79
80
2009-10 Instructional Services consulting time is correlated with % of economically disadvantaged students.
81
ADVOCATE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION GOAL 5
• Increase Oakland County citizens’ support of public education.
82
METRICS FOR GOAL 5.1
• Increase the number of positive responses to survey questions about the quality, relevance and effectiveness of public education in Oakland County.
• This metric is under development for FY 2012.
83
METRICS FOR GOAL 5.2
• Achieve public policy and legislation which improves the adequacy, equity, predictability, and stability of public education funding in Michigan at all levels.
84
Tri-County Alliance, Michigan Association of School Boards, Michigan School Business Officials, Michigan Association of School Administrators and Middle Cities Education Association have been working cooperatively to address the school funding crisis in Michigan. We believe that Michigan needs a comprehensive statewide school funding plan based on data, which will address systemic change in school finance and education reform.
Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC), a well respected, non-partisan public policy research organization has conducted a statewide school finance and reform study. The study, “Education in Michigan: Finance and Reform,” provides comprehensive and much needed data to both quantify and clarify the school funding debate.
85
ADVOCATE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATIONGOAL 5.3
• Expand alliances with federal representatives, the Michigan Legislature, Michigan department of Education, and other organizations and state agencies that result in legislative and policy decisions that positively impact school districts and their students.
86
METRICS FOR GOAL 5.3
• Oakland Schools will be part of a number of national, state and local alliances aimed at improving public education policy.
87
We communicate with and provide legislative services to local education organizations including:
• Oakland Schools Board of Education• Oakland County Superintendents Association (OCSA)• Oakland County Superintendents Association Legislative
Action Committee (OCSA LAC)• Oakland County School Boards Association (OCSBA)• Oakland County School Boards Association Legislative
Committee• Oakland County School Business Officials (OCSBO)• Oakland County Human Resource Association (OCHRA)• Oakland County School Public Relations Association
(OCSPRA)• Oakland County Teaching & Learning Council (T&L)• Tri-County Alliance (TCA)
Oakland Schools is part of many state and national alliances aimed at improving public education.
88
FOSTER COMMUNICATION AND ENGAGEMENT
GOAL 6.1• Improve timely two-way communication and
engagement among educators and other relevant stakeholders.
89
METRICS FOR GOAL 6.1
• Multiple venues, including technology and social media, are used to communicate and engage with stakeholders.
90
Using multiple venues (e.g., Moodle, Twitter, Facebook, & Wikis) is a growing practice in Oakland Schools, but we have not yet implemented a mechanism to collect, track and report comprehensive data regarding the extent of this emerging way of connecting and engaging with our stakeholders.
Social media are being used at Oakland Schools, but …
91
METRICS FOR GOAL 6.1.2
• Stakeholder satisfaction with the quality and types of products, services and resources offered by Oakland Schools will be maintained at high levels.
92
2008 OS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEYHOW WELL ARE WE DOING WHAT WE DO?
Across the 82 services, programs or products rated by districts (27 of 28), the percent of Very Well (4) ratings to Not at All (1) ratings:
4 3 2 1 N Very Somewhat Not Very Not at All Not Sure
or Unaware
42.3% 29.4% 9.7% 2.1% 16.5%
65 services, programs or products were rated by 20 (75%) or more of the districts (i.e., treating Not Sure or Unaware as missing data), of those: •61 (93.8%) had 75% or more positive ratings (Somewhat or Very Well)•1 (1.5%) had 30% or more negative ratings (Not Very or Not at All)
Survey data have shown that stakeholder satisfaction with Oakland Schools’ services is high.
93
METRICS FOR GOAL 6.1.3
• Maintain highly engaged referent groups around Oakland Schools products, services and resources.
94
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged referent groups.
95
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged referent groups.
96
Oakland Schools maintains many highly engaged referent groups.
97
FOR MORE INFORMATION…
• Visit the Oakland Schools website at www.oakland.k12.mi.us
• Contact Danelle Gittus, APR, Communication Services Manager at 248.209.2181 or [email protected]
98