Top Banner
Measuring Repeat and Near-Repeat Burglary Effects
22
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Measuring Repeat and Near-Repeat Burglary Effects

Page 2: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Repeat and Near-Repeat Victimization

• Criminals likely to revisit crime scene

• Likely to rob neighbors of previous victims

Page 3: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Why?

• Knowledge of entry modes and security

• Easy access to site

• Abundance of material possessions

• Knowledge of neighbor’s daily routines

Page 4: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Data analysis

• Measured the distribution of wait times between successive burglaries

• Rapidly decaying function

• Conclusion: houses likely to be robbed again within a short period of time of a burglary

• Thus repeat victimization hypothesis is true?

Page 5: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Sliding Window Method

• After a house is robbed, we watch it for the next 727 days. If it is robbed again, we record the elapsed time,

• Find that data follows this model:

Page 6: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Sliding Window Method

• Long Beach Data Set

3

Page 7: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Each house can be in one of three states

gives the rate of robbery in state i

gives the fraction of houses in state I

Long Beach Results:

Page 8: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Neighborhoods

• Split events into sections • Examine repeat crime dynamics of different

neighborhoods• Partition data into 1-day bins, scale, and then

fit with exponential sum• For fit, we equally weight each bin and use

equation of form:

Page 9: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 10: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 11: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 12: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Near Neighbor Effects

• Repeat victimization hypothesis also applies to near repeats: repeated robberies within a short distance of original crime

• Compute time interval for repeat within a range of Euclidean radii – e.g. 0-100 m

Page 13: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Near Neighbor Effects

• We then fit histogram to:

• If we assume housing density is uniform and scale the lambdas according, we find that decays with increasing radius in the form of a power law:

Page 14: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 15: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Manhattan Distance

• We also analyze near repeats according to Manhattan rather than Euclidean distance

• Manhattan distance:

Page 16: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Manhattan Distance Euclidean Distance

Page 17: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 18: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Near Repeat Neighborhoods

• Perform same analysis, but only consider near repeats within the same neighborhoods

• Use Euclidian distance

Page 19: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 20: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.
Page 21: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Current Work

• Programmed C++ simulation based on repeat model with parameters from LB

• Currently adding different dynamics for different neighborhoods

Page 22: Measuring Repeat and Near- Repeat Burglary Effects.

Application to Disaster LA

• Can use analysis on LA crime data to figure out LA parameters

• Neighborhood dynamics more applicable in LA than LB

• Can use simulation to predict the spread of mayhem in a disaster