Top Banner
CRN 6522 ARCHITECTURE AND RACE IN DESIGN THE NEW SCHOOL/ Department of Architecture Instructor: Charles Davis; Tel: (215) 207-1770; email: [email protected]; Class Time: (T) 3:00-5:30pm; Office hours: by appointment Description: The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the ways that architecture and race have been formulated in architectural history, architectural theory and architectural form. Towards that end, the class will survey the following oppositional discourses in architecture: (1) SOCIAL HISTORIES OF ARCHITECTURE analyze architecture for its role in visualizing the social dynamics of race and class. As the city develops over time, architecture provides a public record of social conditions that normally resist formalization. Segregation, gentrification, social housing and place theory are key terms in this research. (2) POLITICAL METAPHORS IN ARCHITECTURE locate the ways that architecture operates within political frameworks. Because radical black politics and civil rights are symptomatic of broader democratic ideals, they have systematically been translated in ‘liberal’ and ‘neo- liberal’ architectural processes of representation. (3) BIOLOGICAL AND LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTIONS OF RACE reflect a contemporary interest in the roots of architectural formalism. This research analyzes architectural theory for its ‘structural’ conceptions of race, presenting these frameworks as inherent elements of formalist discourse.
42

Lecture Crn 6522

Nov 01, 2014

Download

Design

cdavis

Presentation on my course at Parsons.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Lecture Crn 6522

CRN 6522

ARCHITECTURE AND RACE IN DESIGN

THE NEW SCHOOL/ Department of ArchitectureInstructor: Charles Davis; Tel: (215) 207-1770; email: [email protected]; Class Time: (T) 3:00-5:30pm; Office hours: by appointment

Description: The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the ways that architecture and race have been formulated in architectural history, architectural theory and architectural form. Towards that end, the class will survey the following oppositional discourses in architecture:

(1) SOCIAL HISTORIES OF ARCHITECTURE analyze architecture for its role in visualizing the social dynamics of race and class. As the city develops over time, architecture provides a public record of social conditions that normally resist formalization. Segregation, gentrification, social housing and place theory are key terms in this research.

(2) POLITICAL METAPHORS IN ARCHITECTURE locate the ways that architecture operates within political frameworks. Because radical black politics and civil rights are symptomatic of broader democratic ideals, they have systematically been translated in ‘liberal’ and ‘neo-liberal’ architectural processes of representation.

(3) BIOLOGICAL AND LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTIONS OF RACE reflect a contemporary interest in the roots of architectural formalism. This research analyzes architectural theory for its ‘structural’ conceptions of race, presenting these frameworks as inherent elements of formalist discourse.

Page 2: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 3: Lecture Crn 6522

1

2

3

Page 4: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 5: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 6: Lecture Crn 6522

PHYSIOGNOMY, TAXONOMY, AND

CHARACTER

AESTHETICS, PRIMITIVISM, AND

ORGANICISM

Page 7: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 8: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 9: Lecture Crn 6522

NEOLIBERALISM AND ADVOCACY

PLANNING

Page 10: Lecture Crn 6522

RACE AS STRUCTURAL,

BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE

Page 11: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 12: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 13: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 14: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 15: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 16: Lecture Crn 6522

Fig. 1. An original countenance that will speak sensibility,

timidity, perspicuity, wit, and imagination. Not to be

numbered among the strong, bold, unshaken, and

enterprising; but very considerate, cautious to timidity.

Fig. 2. A man of business. Undoubtedly possessed of

talents, punctual honest, love of order, and deliberation.

An acute inspector of men; a calm, dry, determined

judge. To the middle of the mouth is an advancing trait,

which speaks superiority in common affairs.

Fig. 3. A good head-Cannot be mistaken, not even in

shade. Conceal the under part and Leave only the nose

and forehead visible and signs of attention, love of order

and certainty are apparent. The forehead, altogether, is

too perpendicular for a productive, mind.

Fig. 4. The forehead is not so entirely exact and pure as

to discover the whole capacity of his understanding. The

harmony of the whole, especially the nose, mouth, and

chin, denote a mind of extraordinary observation,

research, and analysis.

Fig. 5. A noble forehead, a miracle of purity, the love of

order, I might say, the love of light. Such the nose, such

is all.

Fig. 6. Much is to be learnt from this shade. Takes little,

gives much; this is particularly conspicuous in the too

round outline of the lips, which is most defective. The

most delicate lines have either not been remarked, or cut

away. The upper part of the forehead is, also, something

curtailed; otherwise this countenance is refined, discreet,

capable of talents, taste, wit, and morals".

Page 17: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 18: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 19: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 20: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 21: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 22: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 23: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 24: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 25: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 26: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 27: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 28: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 29: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 30: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 31: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 32: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 33: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 34: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 35: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 36: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 37: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 38: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 39: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 40: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 41: Lecture Crn 6522
Page 42: Lecture Crn 6522