Top Banner
1 Learning Association and Adaptation: From Drooling Dogs to Pigeon Punishment Mr E. Maziti
35

LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Oct 31, 2014

Download

Documents

muchichwakudza6

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

11

Learning Association and Adaptation: From Drooling Dogs to Pigeon PunishmentMr E. Maziti

Page 2: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2

How would you teach a tiger to jump through a flaming hoop? What steps would you take to have the tiger learn this?

2

“Don’t try this athome kids!” “That was grrrrrrreat!”

Page 3: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

33

What is “Learning”? A process by which behaviors, skills and

capabilities are changed and/or modified though experience

Time Acquired Behaviors

Constraints/

Requirements Resulting Behavior

N None Get started Read Coffee Label

N + 1 How to measure coffee How much water Fill carafe w/ water to

appropriate line

N + 2 Above + measuring water Where does water go?

Read coffee maker instructions

N + 3 Above + where to

pour water

Where to put measured coffee

Read coffee maker instructions

N + 4 Above + where to put

filter & measured coffee

Start brewing Read coffee maker instructions

N + 5 Above + how to brew Coffee not done Wait

Page 4: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

44

What is “Learning”? Adapting to environmental changes and

constraintsChange behaviors to meet demands and

improve chance of survival How does this relate to human evolution

and natural selection?

Page 5: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

55

What is “Learning”? Is learning the same thing as memory?

Memory is the retention of learned informationLearning DOES change memory capabilities

Learning results in more refined neural connections

Page 6: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

66

What is “Learning”? Are some “learned behaviors” innate and

acquired through evolution? Behaviors with fixed action patterns are

innate Baby herring gulls

peck at ANY red dot

Page 7: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

77

What is “Learning”? Is attending to a novel stimulus an

“automatic/innate fixed action pattern”?

Does habituation occur?

Page 8: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

88

Classical Conditioning “Learning though association”

All learning is about forming an association Accidentally discovered by Ivan Pavlov

Dogs salivated before food presentedSalivation originally elicited by only food

One of Pavlov’s Drooling Dogs

Page 9: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

99

Classical Conditioning An unconditioned stimulus (UCS) elicits a

reflex-like unconditioned response (UCR)

Begin pairing UCS with a neutral stimulus

+

Page 10: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1010

Classical Conditioning Eventually, neutral stimulus alone begins to

elicit the same response as the UCS

Neutral stimulus is now a conditioned stimulus (CS)

Response from CS is a conditioned response (CR)

Page 11: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1111

Classical Conditioning Acquisition phase

Repeated pairing of neutral stimulus with UCS Learning has occurred when the neutral stimulus

alone elicits the CS

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Trials (Days)

Str

eng

ht

of

Res

po

nse

to

CS Asymptote

Page 12: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1212

Classical Conditioning Extinction of a learned CS-UCS association

“Countdown to Extinction” depends on the initial CS-UCS strength

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Trials (Days)

Str

engt

h of

Res

pons

e to

CS

Page 13: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1313

Classical Conditioning Spontaneous recovery

Are associations are ever really gone?Problem with phobias

Stimulus generalizationNeutral stimuli similar to CS can elicit CR Is this adaptive for survival?

Higher-order conditioningLearn to associate CS with new neutral

stimulus (“learning from learning”)

Page 14: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1414

Classical Conditioning “The Tragedy of Little Albert”

Watson’s early behaviorist researchShowed that fears/phobias are learned and

conditioned through experience Is “fear generalization” good?

Page 15: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1515

Classical Conditioning: Applications Exposure Therapy (Desensitization)

Used to alleviate phobias and anxietyRank Anxiety Provoking Stimulus

1 Waiting to Board the Plane

2 Going through Security

3 Getting to the Airport

4 The Day of the Flight

5 Confirming the Flight

6 Receiving the e-Ticket

7 Buying the Tickets for the Flight

8 Knowing that You have to Fly

9 Watching a Plane Overhead

10 Hearing a Plane Overhead

Page 16: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1616

Classical Conditioning: Applications Aversion Therapy

Pair a desired CS

with an aversive UCSEmetics with Alcohol

Conditioned Taste AversionA neutral food is associated with nausea, which

is both the UCS and UCR Is this adaptive for survival?

Page 17: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1717

Operant Conditioning Learning through consequences

Associate a behavior with its outcome Edward Thorndike’s Law of Effect

Cats in a puzzle boxEventually, the cat did something to escape

and this behavior was reinforced

Page 18: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1818

Operant Conditioning Influenced by Skinner

Interaction with environment is a strong motivator

Learning is a three part sequence:(1) Antecedents must be present

(2) Behavior can occur

(3) Consequence of behavior results

Consequences provide either: Reinforcement increases likelihood of behavior Punishment decreases likelihood of behavior

Page 19: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

1919

Operant Conditioning Reinforcement procedures

Increases the likelihood of a behavior in futureAssociated with desirable outcomes

Operant

Procedure Behavior Consequence ResultReal World Example

Positive

Reinforcement

Response

Is Made

Reward is

Presented

Likelihood of the

Behavior Increases

Chores =

Allowance

Negative

Reinforcement

Response

Is Made

Aversive

Stimulus Removed

Likelihood of the

Behavior IncreasesAspirin = No Headache

─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ Time ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─→

Page 20: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2020

Operant Conditioning Punishment procedures (and extinction)

Decreases likelihood of behavior in future Associated with undesirable/aversive outcomes

Operant

Procedure Behavior Consequence ResultReal World Example

Positive

Punishment

Response

Is Made

Aversive Stimulus

Presented

Likelihood of the

Behavior Decreases

Drunk =

Vomiting

Negative

Punishment

Response

Is Made

A Desired

Stimulus Removed

Likelihood of the

Behavior DecreasesHooking = Penalty Box

Operant

Extinction

Response

Is Made

A once reinforcing stimulus is no longer presented

Likelihood of the

Behavior Decreases

Heroin no Longer = Euphoria

─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ Time ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─→

Page 21: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

21

Operant Conditioning How often/frequently should a behavior be

reinforced to facilitate learning? What is best reinforcement schedule?

Fixed Ratio ScheduleVariable Ratio ScheduleFixed Interval ScheduleVariable Interval

Schedule

Page 22: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2222

Operant Conditioning Shaping is slowly and continually

modifying behaviorReinforced at each stepEventually, doing a

early step elicits next stepThe “Tony The Tiger”

example from earlier was

shaping

Step Goal: Learn to do Laundry

10 Fold and put away clothes

9 Collect dried clothes

8 Put wet clothes in dryer

7 Start washer (wait)

6 Put in clothes and detergent

5 Select correct water temps.

4 Go to laundry room

3 Separate lights/darks

2 Get quarters for laundry

1 Buy Detergent

Page 23: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2323

Operant Conditioning: Applications Escape conditioning

Respond to terminate

aversive situation Avoidance conditioning

Respond to prevent

aversive situation Learned helplessness

Organism “give’s up” when is cannot escape or prevent aversive situation

Page 24: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2424

Operant Conditioning: Applications Token Economies

Used in institutional settingsGood behaviors earn tokens as reinforcersTokens can be used for treats later on

RewardT1 T2 T3 T4 T5

T6 T7 T8 T9 T10

Page 25: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

2525

Operant Conditioning: Applications Behavioral Modification

‘Effective’, controversial method for changing and shaping problematic behaviors

Positive punishment administered

Page 26: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

26

Observational Learning/Modelling

Learning from watching others’ behaviors“Learner” mimics a “role model”

Learn to rebuild engine by watching dad Learn to cook risotto by watching Emeril

Bandura’s Bobo-Doll ExperimentChildren learned to act by watching othersCannot be SR learning

No stimulus presented TO the children

Page 27: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Observational learning- learning by observing others’ beh eg dancing and language

modelling- ability to reproduce behaviour exhibited by another person eg bobo doll experiment

Factors affecting learning Attention- subject must attend to the mode

carefully Retention- must retain the behaviour and

skills in memory27

Page 28: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Motivation- the subject must be able to be pushed by something in oder to imitate the behaviour and its done through reinforcement.

Reinforcement can be direct and indirect. Indirect is called vicarious reinforcement or punishment

Motor reproduction- the subject must be mature enough to reproduce the behaviours attended, retained and strengthened through the reinforcement.

28

Page 29: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Cognitive theory : E. Tolman Humans and animals develops mental

images of and expectations about the environment that influence beh

Latent learning- experiment with rats for 10 days in a maze

1 grp had reinforcement the other didn’t have

On the 11th day the non renreinforced group got reinforcement and the time spent to the end was the same

29

Page 30: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

The non reinforced group had formed cognitive maps of the maze but because there was no reinforcement, the learning remain hidden.

Human form cognitive maps of directions I around the city

Conditioning and cognition- UCS paired with an CS will produce a somewhat same response(salivation) not because the animal is passive but because the animal has learnt to predict the presence of stimuli

30

Page 31: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Expectancies – expectations about the consequences of a beh are what renders the beh to occur or not e.g if a person expect reinforcement , he is likely to perform it.

Learned helplessness( Seligman 1975)- expectancy that one cannot escape aversive events. Dogs that were harness in a box exposed to electric shock for a wile learned that they were helpless. When placed in a shutterbox where they could escape, did not try because of the

31

Page 32: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

helplessness In humans it accounts for depression

32

Page 33: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Factors affecting learning Interstimulus Interval- time between UCS

and CS affects association and learning Forward conditioning- CS preceeds the

UCS- facilitate maximum learning Simultaneous condtioning- UCS and CS at

the same time –less learning Backward conditioning- Cs comes after

UCS and is the least effective

33

Page 34: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Individual’s learning history

34

Page 35: LEARNING THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

35