Purdue Manufacturing Extension Partnership (800) 877-5182 www.mep.purdue.edu LEADING & COACHING FOR SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE
Purdue Manufacturing Extension Partnership(800) 877-5182
www.mep.purdue.edu
LEADING & COACHING FOR SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE
2
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
About the Instructor Joseph (Joe) T. McMurry
Eleven (11) years of experience teaching organizational leadership and industrial technology courses for Purdue University.
Executive positions overseeing all aspects of business, including: operations/manufacturing, organizational development and human resources, engineering, hardware and software development, quality assurance, project management, purchasing, material control and distribution, sales and marketing, contract negotiation and accounting.
Education: Masters in Business Administration, Indiana Wesleyan University Bachelor of Science in General Management, Purdue University,
Krannert School of Management
[email protected](765) 426-7382
3
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Objectives
At the end of this talk, you should be able to: Identify the skills and attitudes needed to be an
effective leader and coach. Assess your own leadership style and ability. Identify employee motivators. Define the coaching process and list coaching best
practices.
4
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Understanding Me Stereotyping Halo effect:
If overall impression is positive, we ignore negative characteristics and concentrate on positive ones.
Horn effect: If overall impression is negative, we ignore positive
characteristics and concentrate on negative ones.
Contrast effect: We perceive greater or lesser differences than actually present
due to prior exposure. A 6’7” basketball player will make an average man of 5’10” seem short.
5
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Understanding Others To effectively lead and coach, we must also
understand others.
Self-actualization: Becoming what you are capable of becoming
Physiological needs: Food, water, warmth, rest
Safety needs: Security, safety
Belongingness and love needs:Intimate relationships, friends
Esteem needs: Prestige, feeling of accomplishment
Self-actualization:
Achieving one’s full potential, including creative activities
Self-fulfillment needs
Psychological needs
Basic needs
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
6
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
McGregor’s Theory X and Theory YTheory X: Assumes employees are
naturally unmotivated and dislike work
Encourages authoritarianmanagement style
Theory Y: Assumes employees are
self-motivated & creative and enjoy working
Encourages participativemanagement style
Key point: Your assumptions can influence your management style.
7
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Motivating Others: Goal Setting
Goal setting theory: Behavior is regulated by values, intentions, and goals.
Principles to improve chance of success: Clarity: SMART goals Challenge Commitment Feedback Task complexity
Key point: Clear goals and appropriate feedback motivate employees.
1. Specific2. Measurable3. Attainable4. Results oriented5. Target dates
8
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
The employee values the reward
The employee believes that acceptable
performance will produce the
desired reward.
The employee believes that
effort will result in acceptable performance.
Motivating Others: Expectancy Expectancy theory: Views motivation as the result
of three different expectancies:
Effort Performance Reward Need satisfaction
Key point: Individuals choose actions they think will provide a reward.
9
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Motivating Others: Equity Theory Equity theory of motivation: We seek a fair balance
between what we put into our work and what we get out. Perceived favoritism can be a result.
Key point: Employees are motivated by a positive connection between what they put in and what they get out.
Inputs Outputs
Time, effort, ability, loyalty, flexibility, commitment,
reliability, personal sacrifice, etc.
Pay, perks, benefits, security, recognition, enjoyment,
development, reputation, praise, responsibility, etc.
10
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Motivating Others: Contingency
Contingency theory (Hersey-Blanchard): Leadership depends upon the
individual situation. No single leadership style can
be considered the “best.”
A larger version of this diagram is in your participant's guide.
Source: Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2013). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources. Boston: Pearson.
11
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
12
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Clarifying Roles & Objectives Clearly explain an assignment and the reason for it.
Set specific goals and deadlines for important tasks. Explain priorities for different objectives or responsibilities. Check for understanding of the assignment.
Provide any necessary instruction on how to do it. Observe operations directly. Ask specific questions.
Encourage reporting of problems and mistakes. Use information from monitoring to guide other
behaviors.
13
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Supporting Employees Show acceptance and positive regard. Provide empathy and support when a person is
anxious or upset. Bolster the person’s self-esteem and confidence. Be willing to help with personal problems.
A leader is only as successful as his/her team.
14
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Developing Employees
Mentoring Show concern for
each person’s development.
Promote the person’s reputation.
Provide helpful career advice.
Help the person prepare for a job change.
Coaching Help the person
identify ways to improve performance (be patient and helpful when coaching).
Encourage coaching by peers when appropriate.
Developing subordinates’ skills: Provide developmental
opportunities Assign appropriate but
challenging tasks. Encourage attendance at
relevant training activities.
Provide opportunities to learn from experience.
15
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Team Member Performance What should our employees expect and deserve
regarding our reaction to performance problems? McMurry’s four (4) questions.
1. Have I given them the proper tools?2. Have I given them the proper training?3. Have I given them the responsibility AND
authority to do their job?4. Have I gotten out of their way?
16
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Employee Coaching
Coaching: Is an approach to managing people. Creates a motivating climate for performance. Improves the match between actual and expected
performance. Increases the probability for employee success. Requires an understanding of yourself and your
employees. What motivates employees?
Fits with a participative leadership style.
17
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Coaching Process
Identify a performance gap
Get agreement on the gap
Explore causes and solutions
Develop a plan of action
Assess progress; provide praise
18
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Coaching Guidelines Make it an encounter, not a confrontation.
Focus on the behavior, not the person. Use “I” messages, not “You” messages. Ask open-ended questions. Use empathy when appropriate.
Clearly define consequences: Focus on both positive or negative. Whatever you do, make sure you can follow through!
Invite options for resolution and offer support.See additional information on
coaching in your participant's guide.
19
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Activity: Coaching Practice
You are a payroll manager supervising 25 people. Your team works in close quarters with little physical separation between work stations. Drew is one of your best performers, yet you have received complaints that Drew tends to sprinkle conversations with rather crude and vulgar references. This is not a team of saints, but some have complained that Drew is crossing the line. You need to talk to Drew.
20
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Objectives Now that you have completed this workshop, you should
be able to: Identify the skills and attitudes needed to be an
effective leader and coach. Assess your own leadership style and ability. Identify employee motivators. Define the coaching process and list coaching best
practices.
21
SP152 Leading & Coaching for Superior Performance, V2 Copyright 2019 Purdue University
Sources Adapted from Bortner, R. W. (1969). A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern a behavior.
Journal of Chronic Diseases, 22(2), 87-91. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(69)90061-7
Cook, M., & Poole, L. (2011). Manager's guide to effective coaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Crawford, D. (2008). We Need to Talk: Ten Scenarios to Practice Handling Needed Conversations(Publication). Retrieved April 7, 2016, from Society for Human Resource Management website: https://www.shrm.org/Education/hreducation/Documents/We Need to Talk.pdf
Griffith, D., Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, C. (2013). Conflict survival kit: Tools for resolving conflict at work. Boston: Pearson.
Johnson, A. (n.d.). Learning & Development: What Is Coaching? Retrieved April 05, 2016, from http://hrweb.mit.edu/learning-development/learning-topics/leading/articles/what-is-coaching
O.P. John, “The ‘Big Five’ Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires,” in L.A. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (NY: Guilford Press 1990), pp. 66-100; and D.L. Formy-Duval, J.E. Williams, D.J.Patterson, and E.E. Fogle, “A ‘Big Five’ Scoring System for the Item Pool of the Adjective Check List,” Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol 65, 1195, pp. 59-76.
Pfeiffer, J. W., & Jones, J. E. (1973). A handbook of structural experiences for human relations training. San Diego: University Associates.
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.