Top Banner
Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd
54

Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Mar 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Analysis of EU MRP/DCP proceduresregarding to generic applications

Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd

Page 2: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

EU Authorities

National Regulatory Authorities

CPMP Committee for Proprietary MedicinalProducts

EMEA The European Agency for the Evaluation ofMedicinal Products

Enterprise DG(Enterprise Directorate-General)Unit F2: PharmaceuticalsRegulatory framework and Market authorisations

EU-Commission

Page 3: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

AIMS of the EU-Commission

– Ensure a high level of protection of public health

– Bring about a single market in pharmaceuticals

– Foster a stable and predictable environment for pharmaceutical innovation

Page 4: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Regulatory policy and tasks of the EC

– Ensure appropriate standards of consumer protection

– Maintain, update and simplify EU pharmaceutical legislation

– Draft new legislation

– Provide guidance on pharmaceutical legislation and ensurethat it is properly implemented within the EU

– Support the mutual recognition of national marketingAuthorisations

– Check that centralised authorisations comply with community law and turn the EMEA opinion into a binding decision for all the Member States (issue the authorization)

Page 5: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Legally binding acts and „soft laws“

Legally binding acts:

• Regulation (e.g. EEC No. 2309/93)• Directive (e.g. 2001/83/EC)• Decision (e.g. N°74/1999)

„Soft laws“:

• Resolution• Communication (e.g. 98/C229/03)• Guideline (e.g. GCP, GMP, GLP)• Notice to Applicants (e.g. Notice toApplicants NTA)

Page 6: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Regulation vs. Directive

Regulations (EEC) no. 726/2004 (EMEA):– Binding legislation which automatically entersinto force in all Member States

Directives 2004/27/EC and 2004/24/EC– Require transposition into national law(normally within 18 months) leaving to nationalauthorities decision as to form and means forachieving desired aim of law

Page 7: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Legally binding acts regulating MRP/DCP MA legislation in theEU

In 2001 a comprehensive reform of the EU pharmaceutical legislation,commonly referred to as “Review 2001” took place.

The following directive was published:

Directive 2001/83/EC on human medicines including rules for marketingauthorisation (MRP and DP), authorisation procedure, manufacture and importation, labelling, pharmacovigilance as well as advertising

Page 8: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Objectives of the review:– guarantee a high level of public health protection for Europeans

– create basic legal conditions for improving the competitiveness of the European pharmaceutical industry

– meet the challenge of EU-enlargement

– rationalise and simplify the medicines authorisation systems

Review 2001

Page 9: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Finalisation of the “Review 2001”

• Regulation 726/2004 Community procedures for authorisation of medicinal products for human and veterinary use – centralised procedure (replaces Regulation 2309/93)

• Directive 2004/27/EC amending Directive 2001/83/EC related to medicinal products for human use

• Directive 2004/24/EC amending Directive 2001/83/EC related to traditional herbal medicinal products

– The most parts of the regulation came in force on 20 November 2005

– all EU member states had to implement the revised directives by 30 October, 2005

Page 10: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Objectives for the finalisation:

– New measures to eliminate the remaining obstacles to free movement– Revision of MRP: Formalisation of Cooperation between Member States– Clear definition of medicinal products to avoid “borderline” products– Clear position, which products have to be authorised by centralised procedure– Renewal and invalidity of marketing authorisation after granting of MA– Harmonisation of data protection– Facilitating the access of generics to the market– Specialities for bio-similars– Quality aspect for MP was enlarged to requirements on active substances– Proper use of medicinal products

Page 11: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Which procedures are possible for generics ?

Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP)

Decentralised Procedure (DCP)

Page 12: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PROCEDURE

Generic Case Study

Page 13: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What is a generic medicine in EU ?

“reference medicinal product” shall mean a medicinalproduct authorised under Article 6, in accordance withthe provisions of Article 8;

“generic medicinal product” shall mean a medicinal product which has the same qualitative and quantitativecomposition in active substances and the same pharmaceutical form as the reference medicinal product, and whose bioequivalence with the reference medicinal product has been demonstrated by appropriate bioavailability studies. The different salts,esters, ethers, isomers, mixtures of isomers, complexes or derivatives of an active substance shall be considered to be the same active substance, unless they differ significantly in properties with regard tosafety and/or efficacy. In such cases, additional information providing proof of the safety and/or efficacy of the various salts, esters or derivatives of an authorised active substance must be supplied by the applicant. The various immediate-release oral pharmaceutical forms shall be considered to be one and the same pharmaceutical form. Bioavailability studies need not be required of the applicant if he can demonstrate that the generic medicinal product meets the relevant criteria as defined in the appropriate detailedguidelines.

DIRECTIVE 2004/27/EC

Page 14: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What is Data Exclusivity ?

Data Exclusivity guarantees market protection for branded pharmaceuticals by preventing health authorities from accepting applications for generic medicines during a given period (6 or 10 years after the first authorisation in the EU of theoriginator product).

Page 15: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Data exclusivity in EU

• for all MA-application after the 20.11.2005:

– The new data protection is valid:

• 8 + 2+ 1 for all products - independent of the approval procedure:• 10 (8+2) years market exclusivity

8 years data protection and receive a MA – the generic MAH is not allowed to place his product on the market until 10 yearshave expired

• 11 (8+2+1) for a new indication with a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies, a yearsupplementary protection is given

Page 16: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What is Bolar Provision?

A “Bolar” provision allows all development, testing andexperimental work required for the registration of ageneric medicine to take place before expiry of the termof the patent protection of the original product.

EU generic companies are forced to develop theirproducts in countries with Bolar provisions and thenimport after patent expiry.

Bolar implentation in some countries – UK October 2005, DE September 2005, IT March 2005LV March 2007.

Page 17: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

If a national marketing authorisation exists, only the Mutual Recognition Procedure is possible

MRP

What does it mean ?

If you have a MA in one or more countries and in order to get a MA insome other country the only possibility is : MRP

Page 18: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

… except

• Medicinal products subject to the centralized procedure

• Line-extensions for non-harmonized products approved bynational procedures (Only PL,LT possible ?)

• Medicinal products not yet reviewed, e.g. products under reevaluation (No such products presently)

• Homeopathic products

MRP exceptions

Page 19: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What are MRP difficulties ?

RMS – reference member state

Presently all EU national Agencies dealing with MRP are booked till 2009

Points to consider• Scientific expertise and knowledge in the therapeutic area• Reputation in the regulatory community• Reliability• Duration of assessment• Good project management and co-ordination skills• Transparency of communication• Market size of RMS (1st approval offers the chance for an earlyentry into a big market)

Page 20: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Applications in Concerned Member States

The applications must be submitted to the competentauthorities of all CMS accompanied by the followingconfirmations:

• the dossier is identical to that approved by the RMS

• the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) isIdentical

• dossier and SPC as submitted are identical for all CMS

CMS- concerned member state

Page 21: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP flow-chart~ 330 days total

Page 22: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP process description

– Submission of the dossier (CTD, SPC, PIL, label) only in the Reference Member State (RMS) for national marketing authorisation

– after 210 d: first marketing authorisation: RMS sends assessment-report to Concerned Member State (CMS); national process

– In further 90 days resolution and agreement to dossier and final SPC

– Further national marketing authorisation in 30 calendar days (translation etc)

Page 23: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP flow-chart

Page 24: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP process description

Page 25: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

THE DECENTRALIZED PROCEDURE

Generic Case Study

Page 26: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

If no marketing authorisation exists, the decentralised procedure can be choosen if the authorisation is planned in more than one Member State

DCP

Page 27: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP flow-chart~ 210 days total

Page 28: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

DCP process description

– Submission of the dossier (CTD, SPC, PIL, label) in the RMS and all CMS

– After 210 days: national marketing authorisations in RMS and CMS

Page 29: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

DCP process description

Page 30: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP issues

Page 31: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

1) Preparation of dossier - Language

Validation of the dossier according to NTA

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

Page 32: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

1) Preparation of dossier – number of copies

EE Modules 4 and 5 should be provided on CD-ROM version only. Paper copy should be available on requestLT Mutual Recognition Procedure where LT acts as CMS: a paper copy of 1&2 modules +all modules on CD-ROMLV Additional copy of all modules on CD – ROM

Validation of the dossier according to NTA

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

Page 33: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

2) Samples, mock-ups

EE in the presentation authorised in RMSLV 2 samples in the form of final sales presentation of the medicinal product

Validation of the dossier according to NTA

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

Page 34: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Validation of the dossier other issues

1) When and where to pay ?2) What documents support payment ?

Payments

Reference product

Brand name issues

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

Page 35: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

During the procedure

Strict follow to timeframes set in procedure

The duration of the clock stop can be strongly influenced by the applicant !!!

Page 36: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

During the procedure

„User test“ (Art. 59 (3) and 61(1) on the patient information has to be done –

• here the tests only in one EU-language is necessary –the result has to be presented in English

Page 37: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

“The package leaflet shall reflect the results of consultations with target patient groups to ensure that it is legible, clear and easy to use” and

“The results of assessment carried out …with target patient groups shall also be provided to the competent authority”

What is the User test ?

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

During the procedure

The action which increases the cost of MA

Page 38: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

National phase

Almost never completed within 30 days MRP and 90 DCP

Not only the SPC but also the package leaflet (PL) and labelling has to be identical

– the „blue box“ concept will allow adequate national information like national marketing authorisation number, special warnings

-proposals of labelling, patient information and summary of product characteristics has to be submitted in one language for applications for marketing authorisation

- the translations of the agreed SPS, PL and labelling have to be submitted at latest 5 days after the end of the procedure to the national competent authorities

Page 39: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

On the packaging the name of the product has to be printed in Braille-format

• Mock-ups of the packaging including the Braille signs have to be submitted with the SmPC

Check the product - hospital or not

National phase

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

Page 40: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

What are main threats in MRP, DCP ?

National phase

Common Baltic Pack – reality ?

Nightmare

„blue box“ too big.

Page 41: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics- generics

Page 42: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics- generics

Page 43: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 44: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 45: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 46: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 47: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 48: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 49: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 50: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP statistics

Page 51: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP tips and tricks

What to do if you have a product you want to sell to different clients ?

Same dossier (photocopies)• Same legal basis Art 8.3 (i) or Art 10.1 Dir 2001/83/EC• Different trade names• Same or linked applicant or different applicant

Multiple applications

Page 52: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

MRP, DCP tips and tricks

What to do if a product was under MRP/DCP but you want to add one countrywhere is no MA ?

Find a company which will Apply as MAH and after granting transfer MA

Page 53: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Key lessons from MRP,DCP

1) To go your own is not the cheapest way

2) Local contact in each country is mandatory

3) Paper work is too complicated that SOPs (Standart Operation Procedures) on spot are of high relevance

Page 54: Kiev, 04/12/2007 Analysis of EU MRP/DCP procedures regarding to generic applications Dr.Raimonds Lozda, FMS Baltic Ltd.

Kiev, 04/12/2007

Contact details:

E-mail: [email protected]

Tel:+37129218104

www.farma.lv