Top Banner
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital Measure and move the metrics that matter All Facebook Marketing Conference November 2012 - @KarlHavard
26

Karl Havard

Dec 18, 2014

Download

Documents

Mediabistro

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Measure and move the metrics that matter

All Facebook Marketing Conference November 2012 - @KarlHavard

Page 2: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

About TBG Digital

1st FacebookAds API

Partner to Market

105 Social Media

Specialists

24/7 Support

and coverage

195 Billion

impressions served

685 Million clicks

delivered

Global clients

66 Million

apps installed

21 245 Countries Million

fans

Page 3: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

One Specialist Solution

1. Strategy Define the business objectives & the metrics that matter

2. Creative

Engage and connect in the right kind of way

3. Media

Reach and recruit the right kind of connections

4. Insights Learn from continually measuring the metrics that matter

@KarlHavard

Page 4: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

A Sea of Metrics

Unfortunately, they’re not “budget clinchers”

@KarlHavard

Page 5: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Metrics that matter

Awareness

Preference

Sales

Consumption

Advocacy

@KarlHavard

Page 6: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Preference

Brand Preference

@KarlHavard

Page 7: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Preference

[Brand x] wanted understand what its Facebook activity brings to the company in terms of brand preference, awareness and

customer value

What’s the story?

@KarlHavard

Page 8: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital 10,462 responses were received within just 24 Hours!

Generated 11,665 non-branded, online beer surveys amongst Facebook users in Brazil, US, Vietnam, Spain, Poland and Netherlands

What did we do?

33% fans

33% non fans

33% friends of fans

Brand Preference

Page 9: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

64% of [brand x] fans

recommend [brand x] to a friend (compared to 22% of non-fans)

Preference

What were the results?

59% of [brand x] fans drink beer more than twice a

week

17% of [brand x] fans prefer [brand x] over the main

competitor in each market

Page 10: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Advocacy

Brand Advocacy

@KarlHavard

Page 11: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

The largest cable operator and home Internet provider in the US wanted to measure the

advocacy surrounding their products…

….and if Facebook Fans had a higher level of advocacy

Advocacy

What’s the story?

@KarlHavard

Page 12: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Advocacy

We used “Social NPS” to measure brand advocacy collecting responses within the Facebook environment Responses were collected from four customer subgroups: fans, non-fans, male and female Users shared their likelihood to recommend by scoring low to high, 0 and 10.

What did we do?

@KarlHavard

Page 13: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

20 points higher Social NPS

for fans compared to non-fans

Advocacy

What were the results?

@KarlHavard

Page 14: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Fans had a higher subscription value

Taking more products

This became even more interesting when

reviewing by “Interest”

Advocacy

What were the results?

@KarlHavard

Page 15: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Sales

Measuring sales for a fashion retailer while recruiting fans

@KarlHavard

Page 16: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

A multinational fashion retailer wanted to acquire Facebook Fans to enhance it’s market position in the

US…

…then measure if this Facebook activity affected sales

It was sceptical…to say the least

Sales

What’s the story?

@KarlHavard

Page 17: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Sales

What did we do? Ran a targeted Facebook fan acquisition campaign and acquired >400,000 new US fans in 42 days Even though this was a pure fan acquisition programme, we wanted to determine the real value these provided to the business…. …so we took a deeper look

@KarlHavard

Page 18: Karl Havard

May

1, 2

01

1

May

11

, 20

11

May

21

, 20

11

May

31

, 20

11

Jun

10

, 20

11

Jun

20

, 20

11

Jun

30

, 20

11

Jul 1

0, 2

01

1

Jul 2

0, 2

01

1

Jul 3

0, 2

01

1

Au

g 9

, 20

11

Au

g 1

9, 2

01

1

Au

g 2

9, 2

01

1

Sep

8, 2

01

1

Sep

18

, 20

11

Sep

28

, 20

11

Oct

8, 2

01

1

Oct

18

, 20

11

Oct

28

, 20

11

No

v 7

, 20

11

No

v 1

7, 2

01

1

No

v 2

7, 2

01

1

De

c 7

, 20

11

De

c 1

7, 2

01

1

De

c 2

7, 2

01

1

Jan

6, 2

01

2

Jan

16

, 20

12

Jan

26

, 20

12

Feb

5, 2

01

2

Feb

15

, 20

12

Feb

25

, 20

12

Mar

6, 2

01

2

Mar

16

, 20

12

Mar

26

, 20

12

Ap

r 5

, 20

12

Ap

r 1

5, 2

01

2

Ap

r 2

5, 2

01

2

May

5, 2

01

2

May

15

, 20

12

May

25

, 20

12

Jun

4, 2

01

2

Jun

14

, 20

12

Jun

24

, 20

12

Jul 4

, 20

12

Jul 1

4, 2

01

2

Jul 2

4, 2

01

2

Au

g 3

, 20

12

Au

g 1

3, 2

01

2

Au

g 2

3, 2

01

2

Sep

2, 2

01

2

Sep

12

, 20

12

Sep

22

, 20

12

Oct

2, 2

01

2

Orders

May

1,…

May

11

,…

May

21

,…

May

31

,…

Jun

10

,…

Jun

20

,…

Jun

30

,…

Jul 1

0,…

Jul 2

0,…

Jul 3

0,…

Au

g 9

,…

Au

g 1

9,…

Au

g 2

9,…

Sep

8,…

Sep

18

,…

Sep

28

,…

Oct

8,…

Oct

18

,…

Oct

28

,…

No

v 7

,…

No

v 1

7,…

No

v 2

7,…

De

c 7

,…

De

c 1

7,…

De

c 2

7,…

Jan

6,…

Jan

16

,…

Jan

26

,…

Feb

5,…

Feb

15

,…

Feb

25

,…

Mar

6,…

Mar

16

,…

Mar

26

,…

Ap

r 5

,…

Ap

r 1

5,…

Ap

r 2

5,…

May

5,…

May

15

,…

May

25

,…

Jun

4,…

Jun

14

,…

Jun

24

,…

Jul 4

,…

Jul 1

4,…

Jul 2

4,…

Au

g 3

,…

Au

g 1

3,…

Au

g 2

3,…

Sep

2,…

Sep

12

,…

Sep

22

,…

Oct

2,…

Visits Revenue

Page 19: Karl Havard

Sales

We went deeper still…

…to correlate other marketing activities to determine the

different influencing factors

@KarlHavard

Page 20: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Company presence Fan Acquisition Hot Spots Partner retailer presence

What drove fans?

Page 21: Karl Havard

Sales

And we discovered that sales increased in the fan acquisition hot spots

@KarlHavard

Page 22: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Au

g 1

, 201

2

Au

g 4

, 201

2

Au

g 7

, 201

2

Au

g 1

0, 2

01

2

Au

g 1

3, 2

01

2

Au

g 1

6, 2

01

2

Au

g 1

9, 2

01

2

Au

g 2

2, 2

01

2

Au

g 2

5, 2

01

2

Au

g 2

8, 2

01

2

Au

g 3

1, 2

01

2

Sep

3, 2

012

Sep

6, 2

012

Sep

9, 2

012

Sep

12

, 201

2

Sep

15

, 20

12

Sep

18

, 20

12

Sep

21

, 20

12

Sep

24

, 20

12

Sep

27

, 20

12

Sep

30

, 20

12

Oct

3, 2

012

Oct

6, 2

012

Oct

9, 2

012

Oct

12

, 201

2

Oct

15

, 201

2

Oct

18

, 201

2

Oct

21

, 201

2

Order Volume by region

California: Fan acquisition - High Store - Yes New York: Fan acquisition - High Store - Yes Illinois: Fan acquisition - Low Store - Yes Texas: Fan acquisition - Low Store - Yes

FB activity starts

Page 23: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Fans drove sales

May

1,

- M

ay 7

,

May

8,

- M

ay 1

4,

May

15

, -

May

21

,

May

22

, -

May

28

,

May

29

, -

Ju

n 4

,

Jun

5,

- J

un

11

,

Jun

12

, -

Ju

n 1

8,

Jun

19

, -

Ju

n 2

5,

Jun

26

, -

Ju

l 2,

Jul 3

, -

Ju

l 9,

Jul 1

0,

- J

ul 1

6,

Jul 1

7,

- J

ul 2

3,

Jul 2

4,

- J

ul 3

0,

Jul 3

1,

- A

ug

6,

Au

g 7

, -

Au

g 1

3,

Au

g 1

4,

- A

ug

20

,

Au

g 2

1,

- A

ug

27

,

Au

g 2

8,

- S

ep 3

,

Sep

4,

- S

ep 1

0,

Sep

11

, -

Sep

17,

Sep

18

, -

Sep

24,

Sep

25

, -

Oct

1,

Oct

2,

- O

ct 8

,

Oct

9,

- O

ct 1

5,

Oct

16,

-

Oct

22

,

Oct

23,

-

Oct

29

,

Oct

30,

-

No

v 5

,

No

v 6

, -

No

v 1

2,

No

v 1

3,

- N

ov

19,

No

v 2

0,

- N

ov

26,

No

v 2

7,

- D

ec

3,

Dec

4,

- D

ec 1

0,

Dec

11

, -

De

c 1

7,

Dec

18

, -

De

c 2

4,

Dec

25

, -

De

c 3

1,

Jan

1,

- J

an 7

,

Jan

8,

- J

an 1

4,

Jan

15

, -

Jan

21

,

Jan

22

, -

Jan

28

,

Jan

29

, -

Feb

4,

Feb

5,

- F

eb 1

1,

Feb

12

, -

Feb

18,

Feb

19

, -

Feb

25,

Feb

26

, -

Mar

3,

Mar

4,

- M

ar 1

0,

Mar

11

, -

Mar

17

,

Mar

18

, -

Mar

24

,

Mar

25

, -

Mar

31

,

Ap

r 1

, -

Ap

r 7

,

Ap

r 8

, -

Ap

r 1

4,

Ap

r 1

5,

- A

pr

21

,

Ap

r 2

2,

- A

pr

28

,

California + Orders 2011

New York + Orders 2011

California + Orders 2012

New York + Orders 2012

2011

2012

Page 24: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital

Sales

What were the results? 72%

more orders

44%

more Revenue

Case period 29th Aug to 16th Oct 2011 & 2012

if compared with the same period last year when there was no live Facebook activity

@KarlHavard

Page 25: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Intelligent media targeted at the high value consumer segments: Quanity and quality in balance

Award winning creative across social media; which enhances the effectiveness of other marketing

Social Media Planning & Buying

Creative

Insights & Strategy

Smart Social that scales

Your Social Purpose

Brand & Consumer engagement based upon key insights and measuring the

metrics that matter

Page 26: Karl Havard

© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital

Thank you

Karl Havard (@KarlHavard)

Insights & Strategy Director TBG Digital http://tbgdigital.com