Top Banner
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL DES ARCHIVES EXPERTS GROUP ON ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION RECORDS IN CONTEXTS ACONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION Consultation Draft v0.1 September 2016 Comments are welcome at [email protected]
116

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

Feb 03, 2018

Download

Documents

ngoxuyen
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

INTERNATIONALCOUNCILONARCHIVES

CONSEILINTERNATIONALDESARCHIVES

EXPERTSGROUPONARCHIVALDESCRIPTION

RECORDSINCONTEXTSACONCEPTUALMODELFORARCHIVALDESCRIPTION

ConsultationDraftv0.1

September2016

[email protected]

Page 2: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts
Page 3: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

TableofContents

1.Introduction..............................................................................................................................................................1

1.1ExpertsGrouponArchivalDescription(EGAD)...................................................................................................1

1.2OverviewofCurrentandPlannedWork.............................................................................................................1

1.3Audiences............................................................................................................................................................2

1.4TheEssentialRoleofRecordsandRecordKeeping............................................................................................3

1.5Provenance,Context,andDescription...............................................................................................................4

1.6RoleofRecordDescription.................................................................................................................................6

1.6.1ManagementofRecords.............................................................................................................................6

1.6.2PreservationofRecords..............................................................................................................................7

1.6.3OngoingUseandReuseofRecords.............................................................................................................7

1.7RecordDescriptioninTransition.........................................................................................................................7

1.8FromISAD(G),ISAAR(CPF),ISDF,andISDIAHtoRiC-CM.....................................................................................9

1.8.1FromUnitofDescriptiontoRecordandRecordSet.................................................................................10

1.8.2FromMultilevelDescriptiontoMultidimensionalDescription.................................................................10

1.9TransitiontoRiC-CM.........................................................................................................................................11

1.10Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................................12

2.Entities.....................................................................................................................................................................13

RiC-E1Record..........................................................................................................................................................13

RiC-E2RecordComponent......................................................................................................................................13

RiC-E3RecordSet....................................................................................................................................................13

RiC-E4Agent...........................................................................................................................................................14

RiC-E5Occupation..................................................................................................................................................15

RiC-E6Position........................................................................................................................................................15

RiC-E7Function.......................................................................................................................................................16

RiC-E8Function(Abstract)......................................................................................................................................16

RiC-E9Activity.........................................................................................................................................................16

RiC-E10Mandate....................................................................................................................................................17

RiC-E11DocumentaryForm....................................................................................................................................18

RiC-E12Date...........................................................................................................................................................18

RiC-E13Place..........................................................................................................................................................18

RiC-E14Concept/Thing...........................................................................................................................................18

3.PropertiesofEntities...............................................................................................................................................21

Page 4: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

3.1SharedPropertiesofallEntities........................................................................................................................21

RiC-P1GlobalPersistentIdentifier.....................................................................................................................21

RiC-P2LocalIdentifier........................................................................................................................................21

RiC-P3Name.......................................................................................................................................................21

RiC-P4GeneralNote...........................................................................................................................................21

3.2PropertiesofRecord.........................................................................................................................................22

3.2.1ContentInformation..................................................................................................................................22

RiC-P5AuthenticityandIntegrityNote..............................................................................................................22

RiC-P6ContentType...........................................................................................................................................22

RiC-P7ContentExtent........................................................................................................................................22

RiC-P8QualityofInformation.............................................................................................................................22

RiC-P9ScopeandContent..................................................................................................................................23

3.2.2InformationaboutRepresentation............................................................................................................23

RiC-P10EncodingFormat...................................................................................................................................23

RiC-P11LanguageInformation...........................................................................................................................23

RiC-P12MediaType............................................................................................................................................23

RiC-P13ProductionTechnique...........................................................................................................................24

3.2.3InformationaboutCarrier.........................................................................................................................24

RiC-P14Medium.................................................................................................................................................24

RiC-P15PhysicalorLogicalExtent......................................................................................................................24

RiC-P16PhysicalCharacteristicsNote................................................................................................................24

3.2.4InformationaboutManagementandUse.................................................................................................24

RiC-P17Classification.........................................................................................................................................24

RiC-P18ConditionsofAccess.............................................................................................................................25

RiC-P19ConditionsofUse..................................................................................................................................25

RiC-P20History...................................................................................................................................................25

RiC-P21RecordState..........................................................................................................................................26

3.3PropertiesofRecordComponent.....................................................................................................................26

3.4PropertiesofRecordSet...................................................................................................................................26

RiC-P22AuthenticityandIntegrityNote............................................................................................................26

RiC-P23Type.......................................................................................................................................................26

RiC-P24AccrualNote..........................................................................................................................................27

RiC-P25AccrualStatus........................................................................................................................................27

RiC-P26Arrangement.........................................................................................................................................27

RiC-P27Classification.........................................................................................................................................27

RiC-P28History...................................................................................................................................................28

Page 5: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

3.5PropertiesSummarizingtheMembersofaRecordSet....................................................................................28

RiC-P29ContentExtent......................................................................................................................................28

RiC-P30PhysicalorLogicalExtent......................................................................................................................28

RiC-P31ScopeandContent................................................................................................................................29

3.6PropertiesSharedbyAllMemberRecordsofaRecordSet..............................................................................29

3.7PropertiesSharedbyAllAgents........................................................................................................................29

RiC-P32Type.......................................................................................................................................................29

RiC-P33IdentityType.........................................................................................................................................30

RiC-P34LanguageInformation...........................................................................................................................30

RiC-P35History...................................................................................................................................................30

3.8AdditionalPropertySpecifictoPersonandPersonAssumedIdentity.............................................................31

RiC-P36Gender..................................................................................................................................................31

3.9AdditionalPropertySpecifictoDelegate-Agent...............................................................................................31

RiC-P37TechnicalCharacteristics.......................................................................................................................31

3.10AdditionalPropertiesSpecifictoCorporateBodyandCorporateBodyAssumedIdentity............................31

RiC-P38ServicestothePublic............................................................................................................................31

RiC-P39ContactInformation..............................................................................................................................31

RiC-P40OperatingHours....................................................................................................................................32

RiC-P41Facilities.................................................................................................................................................32

3.11PropertiesofOccupation................................................................................................................................32

RiC-P42Type.......................................................................................................................................................32

RiC-P43Description............................................................................................................................................33

RiC-P44History...................................................................................................................................................33

3.12PropertiesofPosition.....................................................................................................................................33

RiC-P45Type.......................................................................................................................................................33

RiC-P46Description............................................................................................................................................33

RiC-P47History...................................................................................................................................................33

3.13PropertiesofFunction....................................................................................................................................34

RiC-P48Type.......................................................................................................................................................34

RiC-P49Description............................................................................................................................................34

RiC-P50History...................................................................................................................................................34

3.14PropertyofFunction(Abstract)......................................................................................................................34

RiC-P51Description............................................................................................................................................34

3.15PropertiesofActivity......................................................................................................................................35

RiC-P52Type.......................................................................................................................................................35

RiC-P53Description............................................................................................................................................35

Page 6: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-P54History...................................................................................................................................................35

3.16PropertiesofMandate....................................................................................................................................35

RiC-P55Type.......................................................................................................................................................35

RiC-P56Description............................................................................................................................................36

RiC-P57History...................................................................................................................................................36

3.17PropertiesofDocumentaryForm...................................................................................................................36

RiC-P58Type.......................................................................................................................................................36

RiC-P59Description............................................................................................................................................36

RiC-P60History...................................................................................................................................................37

3.18PropertiesofDate...........................................................................................................................................37

RiC-P61Type.......................................................................................................................................................37

RiC-P62Calendar................................................................................................................................................37

3.19PropertiesofPlace..........................................................................................................................................37

RiC-P63Type.......................................................................................................................................................37

RiC-P64GeographicCoordinates........................................................................................................................37

RiC-P65Address..................................................................................................................................................38

3.20PropertiesofConcept/Thing...........................................................................................................................38

RiC-P66Type.......................................................................................................................................................38

RiC-P67Description............................................................................................................................................38

4.Relations..................................................................................................................................................................39

4.1ListofRelationsbyDomainEntity....................................................................................................................39

4.1.1RecordRelations........................................................................................................................................40

4.1.2.RecordComponentRelations...................................................................................................................44

4.1.3.RecordSetRelations.................................................................................................................................48

4.1.4.AgentRelations.........................................................................................................................................52

4.1.5.OccupationRelations................................................................................................................................61

4.1.6.PositionRelations.....................................................................................................................................64

4.1.7.FunctionRelations....................................................................................................................................67

4.1.8.Function(Abstract)Relations...................................................................................................................70

4.1.9.ActivityRelations......................................................................................................................................72

4.1.10.MandateRelations.................................................................................................................................76

4.1.11.DocumentaryFormRelations.................................................................................................................78

4.1.12.DateRelations........................................................................................................................................81

4.2.13.PlaceRelations........................................................................................................................................84

4.2.14.Concept/ThingRelations........................................................................................................................88

4.2SharedPropertiesofaRelation........................................................................................................................91

Page 7: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-P68Date.......................................................................................................................................................91

RiC-P69Place......................................................................................................................................................91

AppendixI:ExampleofArchivalDescriptionConformingtoRiC-CM.........................................................................93

AppendixII:ExpertsGrouponArchivalDescriptionMembers...................................................................................95

AppendixII:Bibliography............................................................................................................................................97

Page 8: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts
Page 9: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 1

1.Introduction

1.1ExpertsGrouponArchivalDescription(EGAD)

Inlate2012,theInternationalCouncilonArchives(ICA)ProgrammeCommissionformedtheExpertsGrouponArchivalDescription(EGAD)asthepartialsuccessortotheCommitteeonBestPracticesandStandards.ICAchargedEGADwithdevelopingastandardforthedescriptionofrecordsbasedonarchivalprinciples.Forthe2012–2016term,EGADisspecificallychargedwithdevelopingacomprehensivedescriptivestandardthatreconciles,integrates,andbuildsonthefourexistingstandards:GeneralInternationalStandardArchivalDescription(ISAD(G))1;InternationalStandardArchivalAuthorityRecords—CorporateBodies,Persons,andFamilies(ISAAR(CPF))2;InternationalStandardforDescribingFunctions(ISDF)3;andInternationalStandardforDescribingInstitutionswithArchivalHoldings(ISDIAH)4.

Developinginternationalconsensusonastandardforarchivaldescriptionisadauntingchallenge.Culturaldifferencesandestablishedanddifferingtheoriesandpracticesareatthecoreofthechallenge.ThemembersofEGADrepresentmany(thoughcertainlynotall)ofthesedifferences.Atthesametime,theyshareacommoncommitmenttodevelopingasharedstandardthatrespectsandaccommodatesthepast,andthatrespectsandaccommodatesdifferenceswhileremainingintellectuallycoherentandworkable.EGADalsorecognizesthatdevelopingaconsensuswillnecessarilybeanongoingprocess,afieldofnegotiation.

EGADhastwenty-onemembersfromthirteencountries(pleaseseeAppendixIIforalistofmembers).Whilethemembersarebroadlyrepresentativeoftheglobalarchivalcommunity,therearemanyareaswithlonganddistinguishedhistoriesofadministrationandgovernance,andconcomitanttraditionsofrecordcreation,use,andmanagementthatarenotrepresented,suchasAsia,southwestAsia,andeasternEurope.AndwhileAfrica,centralEurope,andSouthAmericaarerepresented,therepresentationcouldbebroader.Giventhis,themembersofEGADwelcomebroaderinternationalparticipationintheongoingdevelopmentofaninternationalarchivaldescriptionstandard,soastostrengthentheintellectualfoundationofthestandard,andensurethatthestandardrepresentsabroadconsensusandaddressestheneedsoftheglobalarchivalcommunity.1.2OverviewofCurrentandPlannedWork

ThestandardintheinitialstageofdevelopmentbyEGADisnamedRecordsinContexts(RiC).EGADenvisionsatwo-partstandard:aconceptualmodelforarchivaldescription(RiC-CM),andanontology(RiC-O).EGADhasbegunitsworkbydevelopingRiC-CMand,withinRiC-CM,identifyinganddefiningtheprimarydescriptiveentitiesandtheirinterrelationsthatconstitutearchivaldescription.EGADhasfocusedondescribingtheworldfromanarchivalperspective,thatis,aperspectivesituatedinthe

1Availableathttp://www.ica.org/en/isadg-general-international-standard-archival-description-second-

edition<accessed20/06/2016>2Availableathttp://www.ica.org/en/isaar-cpf-international-standard-archival-authority-record-

corporate-bodies-persons-and-families-2nd<accessed20/06/2016>3Availableathttp://www.ica.org/en/isdf-international-standard-describing-functions<accessed

20/06/2016>4Availableathttp://www.ica.org/en/isdiah-international-standard-describing-institutions-archival-

holdings<accessed20/06/2016>

Page 10: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 2

specificmandateofarchivesandgroundedinthefundamentalassumptionsandprinciplesthatgoverntheactivitiesperformedinfulfilmentofthemandate.

ThecurrentdraftisintendedtocoveralloftheessentialcontentofthefourexistingICAdescriptionstandards,except“control.”Itthusincludesthecoredescriptiveentities,thepropertiesorattributesoftheseentities,andessentialrelationsamongthem.Furtherspecifyinganddefiningtherelationsamongtheentitiesremainsanoutstandingtask,astherelationsinthecurrentdraftareintendedtobesuggestiveandnotcompleteornormative.RiC-CMalsodoesnotyetofferamodeloftheroleofthearchivistandtheactivitiesheorsheperformsintheformulationandongoingmaintenanceofdescription.EGADwillextendthemodelinthisrespectasanextstep.

Whencomplete,RiC-CMwillalsoinclude,inadditiontotextdefiningthecoreentities,attributes,andrelations,extensivediagramsoftheentitiesinrelationtooneanotherandexamples.Oncethemodelisstable,itwillbetranslatedintoFrenchandotherlanguages.

ThedevelopmentoftheRiC-Oisinthepreliminarystages.FulldevelopmentispendingastabledraftofRiC-CM,astheontologymustbealignedwiththeconceptualmodel.RiC-OwilltranslateRiC-CMusingtheW3CstandardOWL5.RiC-OwillprovidethearchivalcommunitywiththeabilitytomakearchivaldescriptionavailableusingthetechniquesofLinkedOpenData(LOD)andemployaconceptualvocabularyandstructurethatisspecifictoarchivaldescription.ThefirstdraftofRiC-Owillbemadeavailableinlate2016.1.3Audiences

RiC’sprimaryaudienceisthearchivalcommunity,sothemodeltakesasitspointofdepartureestablishedarchivaldescriptionprinciplesandpractices.Atthesametime,themodeltakesintoconsiderationemergingcommunicationandnetworktechnologiesthatopenupnewopportunitiestoimprovedescriptivepractices,aswellasongoingscholarlyandpracticalcritiquesofarchivaldescriptionprinciplesandpractice.WhilethecurrentICAdescriptionstandardslargelyemergedinaworldofnon-digitalrecords,RiCaspirestoaddressdescriptionnotonlyoftraditionalanaloguerecordsbutalsoelectronicrecords.

RiCisalsointendedtobeofinteresttotherecordsmanagementcommunity.Theworkofrecordsmanagersandarchivistsoverlaps:descriptionandintellectualcontrolareessentialcomponentsofthemanagementofrecordsinthecontextsinwhichtheyarecreated,accumulated,andused,andforarchivistswhoassumeresponsibilityforpreservingandprovidingaccesstothoserecordssubsequently.Intheworldofanaloguerecords,cooperationandcollaborationbetweenrecordsmanagersandarchivistswashighlydesiredandperhapsessentialinenablingarchivalrepositoriestocopewithvastquantitiesofrecordstransferredintotheircustody.Theexplosivegrowthofelectronicrecordsmakessuchcollaborationandcooperationnotmerelydesirablebutanabsolutenecessity.Archivalrepositories,quitesimplystated,areandwillcontinuetobeunabletocopewiththehugevolumesofelectronicrecordsifthoserecordsarenotcreated,used,andmanagedinawaythatamelioratessubsequentpreservationandaccesschallenges.Cooperationbetweenrecordsmanagersandarchivistsisanurgentnecessity.Suchcooperationnecessarilyincludesdescription,butitneedstobeextendedtoaddressmanytechnologicalchallenges.WehopethatRiCwillbeofinteresttorecordsmanagers,andthatdescriptivepracticesbetweenthetwoprofessionalcommunitiescanbealigned.

5Forfurtherinformation,seehttps://www.w3.org/OWL/<accessed20/06/2016>

Page 11: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 3

RiCwill,furthermore,beofinteresttothealliedculturalheritagecommunities.Integratedaccesstoculturalheritageheldbylibraries,archives,museums,andcuratedculturalsitesandmonumentsisincreasinglythefocusofprofessionalcommunities,policymakers,fundingagencies,andusercommunities.Differentculturalheritagecommunitieshavefundamentallydifferentunderstandingsofthenatureoftheobjectsforwhichtheyhavecuratorialresponsibility.Theseunderstandingsandpracticesarewell-establishedandadapted(andadapting)totheparticularchallengesofeachcommunityandthenatureoftheobjectsintheircare.Whilemanyoftheeffortstorealizetheobjectiveofintegratedaccesshavefocusedondevelopingasharedstandardfordescription,reducingthedifferentdescriptivepracticestooneisintellectuallyandpoliticallychallenging.Thisobjective,though,doesnotrequiresuchareduction,asthecommunitiesneedonlyidentifyandcooperatewherethereareshared(orlargelyshared)conceptsandpractices.RiC-Owillfacilitatealigningarchivaldescriptionwiththedescriptionofalliedprofessionalswherethereisconceptualoverlap,furtheringeffortstoprovideintegratedaccesstoculturalheritage.

ItisessentialthatdevelopersofrecordsmanagementandrecorddescriptionandaccesssystemsarepartofRiC’saudience.RiCisdetailedandcomplex,andthereforesuccessfulimplementationandusewillrequirethedevelopmentofmethodsthatwillamelioratetheintellectual,technological,andeconomicchallengeofdatacreationandmaintenance.

Finally,RiCisintendedtobeofinteresttotheresearchusersofarchives,inparticulartoscholarsinterestedinreusingarchivalrecords.ThoughRiCprimarilyfocusesondescriptionthatisbasedonarchivalprinciplesandresponsibilities,itmaybeusedtosupportscholarlydescriptionsofindividualrecordsorsetsofrecordsthatarebasedonotherperspectivesandrequirements.1.4TheEssentialRoleofRecordsandRecordKeeping

Themaking,use,andkeepingofrecordsbeganapproximately4000yearsbeforetheinventionofwriting.TheearliestevidenceofrecordkeepingcoincidedwiththeemergenceofagricultureinMesopotamiaaround8000BCE.Tokensofvariousshapeswereusedtorepresentbothquantitiesandkindsofagriculturalproducts.Fixingthisinformationinenduringformsmadeitpossibletoextendthelimitsofhumanmemoryandmaketheinformationreliablyrecoverable.

Withtheadventofwriting,recordkeepingfurtherenabledtheaccumulationofmemoryandknowledge,andtherebyenabledthedevelopmentandmanagementoflarge,complexsocialstructuresandmonumentalcollectiveundertakings.6TheinventionofwritinginthelatefourthmillenniumBCEcoincidedwiththerapidemergenceofcity-states,ofcomplexsocialhierarchies,ofhierarchiesofauthorityandpower,andofhighlydifferentiatedlabourtiedtoone’spositioninthesocialhierarchy.Recordmakingandkeepingemergedtogetherwithincreasinglyorganized,large,rankedgroupsofindividualsfulfillingdifferentroles,withtheformerplayinganessentialroleinenablingtheongoing

6Fixinginformationinenduringformsisnottheonlymethodofpreservingmemory,asmanysocietiesemployoral-basedmethodsfortransmittingknowledgeacrossgenerations;inmanyinstancesacrossmany,manygenerations.Whatisdistinctaboutwrittenrecordsisthattheyenabletheaccumulationofknowledgeandthemanagementofmonumentalsocialandmaterialundertakingsthattranscendlocalizedsocietiesandcultures.Thisdifferencedoesnotmakewrittenrecordssuperior,thoughithasledtoasymmetricalpowerrelationsthatoften(ifnotalways)havehadtragiceffectsontraditionalsocietiesandcultures.Withrespecttotherelationbetweenpeopleandtheenvironment,arguablytraditionalsocietiesutilizingoral-basedmethodsaresustainablewhilesocietiesbasedonwrittenrecordsultimatelyarenot,giventhelatter’svoraciousconsumptionofnaturalresources.

Page 12: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 4

developmentofthelatter.Withtheadventofwrittenlanguage,therolesandpurposesofrecordmakingexpanded,astherangeanddepthofwhatcouldberecordedandcommunicatedvastlyexceededthelimitedsemanticrepertoireoftokens.7

ThebondbetweenrecordsandtheongoingdevelopmentofevermorecomplexsocialandmaterialhumanexistencerepresentsacontinuoushistoryfromtheeighthmillenniumBCEdowntothepresentday.Bothpeacefulandhostilerelationsamongdifferentcommunitiesproducedanincreasinglyglobalsocialanddocumentarynetwork,sincehumanactivityandrecordshavebeenandcontinuetobeinextricablyintertwined.Recordsemergewithinasocialanddocumentarycontext,andtheimmediatecontextisitselfwithinabroaderspatialandtemporalcontext.

Theprimaryfunctionofrecordsandrecordkeeping,theenablingofhighlyorganized,large-scalesocialandmaterialexistence,hasremainedmoreorlessconstantoverhistory.Inparticular,betweenthesixteenthandeighteenthcenturiesarchiveswereconsideredprimarily“arsenaldel'authorité”andwerejealouslykeptandusedalmostexclusivelyintheinterestofpoliticalandadministrativeauthorities.Intheseventeenthandeighteenthcenturiesnotonlycurrentbutalsohistoricalarchivesweresometimesclassifiedaccordingtotopicsandsubjectratherthanpreservingthearrangementthatemergedinanddocumentedthecontextofcreationanduse.WiththeemergenceofantiquarianandhistoricalinterestineighteenthandnineteenthcenturyEurope,recordsbecamevaluableformorethantheirimmediateutility,asaftertheirpracticalusefulnesswasexhaustedtheybecomeusefulashistoricalevidence.Thenineteenthcenturywitnessedtheemergenceofnation-states,nationalarchives,andmodernhistorythatemphasizednarrativesbasedonreliableevidence.Itwasatthistimethatitwasrecognizedthatarrangementbasedonpertinence,whileitmaybenefitcertaintypesofpracticalandevenantiquarianinterests,diminishedifnotdestroyedtheinherentinterrelationsandinterdependenceofrecords,andtherebydiminishedtheirevidentiaryvalueandunderminedscholarlyunderstandingandinterpretation.Suchpracticesde-contextualizedrecords.TheestablishmentofthePrincipleofProvenancewasintendedtocorrectthesepractices.81.5Provenance,Context,andDescription

ThePrincipleofProvenanceemergedinthenineteenthcentury,andoverthecourseofthecenturybecameestablishedasthefoundationofarchivaltheoryandpracticeinthemodernWest.Theprincipleisunderstoodtohavetwomajorfacets.ThefirstisexpressedintheFrenchRespectdesfonds:therecordscreated,accumulated,andusedbyapersonorgroupinthecourseoflifeandworkaretobekepttogetherandnotintermixedwithrecordsfromothersources.TheruleofRespectdesfondsrecognizesthattherecordsthatonepersonorgroupaccumulatesoverthecourseofhis,her,oritsexistencereflectanddocumentthatexistence,andthattogethertheyconstituteaninterrelatedwhole,acoherentbodyofevidence.Theprincipleisintendedtoensuretheintegrityoftheaccumulation.Thesecondfacet,Respectfororiginalorder,recognizesthattheintellectualgroupingofandsequencing

7DeniseSchmandt-Besserat.HowWritingCameAbout.Austin:UniversityofTexasPress,1996.8RobertHenryBautier."Laphasecrucialedel'histoiredesarchives:laconstitutiondesdépôtsd'archives

etlanaissancedel'archivistique(XVI-débutduXIXsiècle)"ArchivumXVIII,1968,pp.139-149;Archiviestorianell'EuropadelXIXsecolo:alleradicidell'identitàculturaleeuropea,IreneCottaandRosaliaMannoTolueds.,Roma:MinisteroperiBenieleAttivitàculturali,Direzionegeneralepergliarchivi,2006;LucianaDuranti."TheOdysseyofRecordsManagers"RecordsManagementQuarterly23,3and4(1989):3-11and3-11;andStefanBerger."TheroleofnationalarchivesinconstructingnationalmasternarrativesinEurope"ArchivalScience13,1(2013):1-22.

Page 13: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 5

imposedontherecordsinthecontextofaccumulationanduseisessentialtounderstandingtheinterrelationsamongthemaswellasbeingevidenceofhowtheywereused.Applyingeachfacetoftheprincipleinvolvesboththemannerinwhichtherecordsarestored(kepttogetherandorderimposedandmaintained)andtheintellectualdescription(descriptionofthewholeandoftheparts).Whilemanagementofthestorageandtheintellectualdescriptionarecommonlycloselyrelated,thetwoactivitiesaredistinct,andtherelationbetweenthemisnotessential.9

ThePrincipleofProvenance,astraditionallyunderstood,hasbeenquestionedandcriticizedbybotharchivaltheoristsandpractitioners.TheruleofRespectdesfondsemphasizesandprivilegesthepersonorgroupthathasaccumulatedabodyofrecords,andoftendoesnotreflectthesocialandmaterialcomplexityoftheoriginsoftherecords.Individualsinteractwithoneanotherandwithgroups,andgroupswithindividualsandothergroups.Recordsbyoneindividualorgroupareoftenfoundintherecordsofanotherindividualorgroup.Theintellectualcontentofrecordsmayberelatedtothecontentofoneormoreotherrecords.Asinglerecord,orsinglefondsorotheraccumulationofrecords,maybejointlycreatedbymorethanoneindividualorgroup.Morethanonepersonorgroupmayhavedifferingrolesinrelationtoonerecordoronesetofrecords.Peoplecreateanduserecords,andarefrequentlythesubjectofrecords.Boththeemergenceofcollaborativeeditinginthenetworkeddigitalenvironment,whichiscreatingmanyrecordsthathavecomplexauthorship,andtheuseofremotestorageservicesthatarenotfullycontrolledbytheusers,raiseissuesofownershipandcustody.Alloftheseobservationsandmoreleadtotheconclusionthatprovenanceismuchmorecomplexthanthelongestablishedunderstandingoffonds:afondsdoesnotexistinisolation,butwithinlayersofinterconnectedcontexts,past,present,andfuture.

Respectfororiginalorderalsohasgivenrisetocriticism,thoughnotallofthecriticismisnew.ThemeaningofRespectfororiginalorderhasbeenamatterofcontentionand,somewouldsay,confusion.Doesitmeantheoriginalorderoftherecordsthemselves,ortheintellectualorder?Increasinglyitisunderstoodas,firstandforemost,theintellectualorder,andsecondarily,ifatall,thephysicalorderoftherecords.Butthisviewdoesnotrepresentaconsensus.Anongoingchallengehasbeenthatfondsmayarriveinanarchivewithnodiscernibleorder.Insuchcases,thearchivististaskedwithreconstructingit,aswellasispossible,basedonevidenceembodiedintherecordsthemselves.Morerecentcriticismhasquestionedthemeaningof“originalorder,”asitcanonlybeunderstoodasthestateoftherecordsatagivenmoment,themomentwhentherecordsaretransferredfromthecontextofcreationandusetothecontextofthearchive.Overthecourseofthetimewhenabodyofrecordsisaccumulating,theorderoftherecordsisdynamic,changing,fluid.Recordsmay,infact,bereordered,andmorethanonce.

BoththeRespectdesfondsandtheRespectfororiginalorderarearchivalprinciples,notrecordsmanagementprinciples.Bothareretrospective,whereas,inthecontextofcreationanduse,theperspectiveofapersonmanaginghisorherownrecordsortheperspectiveofadesignatedrecordsmanagerisfocusedontheimmediateneedsofthepersonorthegroup.Thefondsanditsinternalorderareinastateofbecoming.

9Thedimensionsofbothanalogueanddigitalrecordsandthephysicalfacilitiesinoronwhichtherecords

arestoreddeterminetheboundariesofthestorageunit,andstorageboundariesarenotthesameastheintellectualboundariesofarecordorsetofrecords.Therelationbetweentheintellectualandstoragecollocationandarrangement,whenthereisone,primarilyservesmanagementpurposes.Whetherthereisorisnotarelation,itisafacetofthecontextoftherecords.

Page 14: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 6

WhilealmostallarchivistsacceptthetheoreticalvalidityofProvenance,manyhavebecomeincreasinglyself-consciousandself-criticalabouttherolethatarchivistsandtheapplicationofarchivalprinciplesplayinwhatisrememberedandhowitisremembered.Thiscriticismnecessarilyencompassesmorethandescription,asitalsoincludesappraisal,theevaluationsthatleadtowhatischosentoberememberedandwhatisnot.Viewedbroadly,appraisaldetermineswhichrecordsarekeptandwhicharenot.Memoryisselective:whatarchivistschoosetokeepdirectlydetermineswhetherthememoryisrepresentativeofsociety.Thesedeterminationshaveprofoundepistemologicalandethicalimplications.Appraisalsbybothrecordsmanagersandarchivists,aswellasaccidentallossordispersalofrecords,alsodirectlydeterminetherelativeintegrityorlackthereofofthefonds.Boththerecordskeptandthoselostorintentionallyremovedarepartofthestoryofthefonds,andthusanimportantfacetofthecontextnecessaryforevaluatingandunderstandingrecordsbyusers.

Increasingly,archivistsobservethatthearchivalperspectiveisoneamongmanypossibleperspectivesthatmaybeemployedintheunderstandingofrecords,thattheythemselvesareperformingtheirjobsinaparticularhistorical(cultural,social,material)context,thattheirjudgementsandactsareshapedandinformedbythecontextswithinwhichtheyliveandwork.Atthesametime,archivistsincreasinglyareobservingthatthecontextsinwhichrecordsemergeandinwhichtheyexistovertimeareirreduciblydynamicandcomplex.

Whentakentogether,thetwoobservationsleadtotheconclusionthatarchivaldescriptionisnotandneverwillbeperfect,buttheyalsoforegroundthechallengeofmakingitbetter,ofimprovingit,ofmakingitpossibletomorefullyexpressthecomplexityofcontextandcontexts,ofmakingexplicitthedifferentrolesoftherecordsmanagersandarchivistsinselectingandformingmemory,andofbeingaccommodatingtotheperspectivesandvaluesofothers.

RiCisintendedtoenablearchiviststoimprovearchivaldescription,tomakeitbetter.1.6RoleofRecordDescription

Thedescriptionofrecordsplaysseveralessentialpurposes.1.6.1ManagementofRecords

Whilerecordedinformationcreatedinthecontextofpeople’slivesandworkservesmanypurposes,oneofitsessentialfunctionsistoservetoextendthelimitsofhumanmemory,tobeanenduringwitnessofeventsandactivities.Asrecordsproliferate,keepingtrackofthemandlocatingthemwhenneededbecomesitselfachallengetohumanmemory.Managementofrecordsinvolvesaninterrelatedcombinationofphysicalandintellectualtechniques.Foranaloguerecords,therecordsaretypicallystoredinasystematichierarchicalmannerthatreflectsthefunctions,activities,andtransactionstheyfacilitateanddocument,combinedwiththeuseoflabelsandothermetadatatofacilitatethestoring,retrieving,andongoinguseoftherecords.Fordigitalrecords,filesystemsmediatethestorageofdigitalfiles,mostcommonlyusingahierarchicaldirectorystructurethatisananalogueofthehierarchicalstorageofphysicalfiles,includingtheuseofdirectoryandfolderlabelsandothermetadata.Inordertoestablishintellectualcontroloverrecordsandfacilitate,locate,identify,retrieve,andusethem,however,itisnecessarytoaugmenttherudimentarymetadataassociatedwiththephysicalordigitalmanagementofrecordswithadditionaldescriptionofcontexts.

ComprehensivedescriptionassuggestedinRIC-CMisessentialfortheeffectivemanagementofrecords.

Page 15: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 7

1.6.2PreservationofRecords

Preservationofrecordshasmultiplefacets.Foranaloguerecords,thisinvolvesstoringtherecordsinenvironmentsthatmitigatephysicalrisks,andongoingmaintenanceofrecordsthathavesuffereddamageorareatrisk.Thechallengebecomesmuchmorecomplexforelectronicrecords,asthecarrier,encodingformat,mediationdeviceandmethodmustbecarefullyandpersistentlymanagedinordertopreservetherecords.Forbothanalogueanddigitalrecords,theauthenticityandintegrityoftherecordsmustbesafeguarded.Suchsafeguarding,inadditiontophysicallymanagingtherecordsassuch,alsoinvolvespreservingthecontextwithinwhichtherecordswerecreated,accumulated,maintained,andusedbydescribingitbasedonavailableevidence.

Recordsemergenotinisolation,butwithinacontext,andwithinthatcontext,inrelationtooneanotherandinrelationtothepeoplecreating,using,andkeepingthem.Thusrecordscannotbeunderstoodinisolationfromthesocial-documentcontextwithinwhichtheyemerge.Documentingthecontextbydescribingitisessentialtothepreservationofrecords.Thispointstoafundamentaltensioninarchivalpractice.Ontheonehand,recordsareevidence,andmaintainingandensuringtheintegrityandauthenticityoftherecordasevidenceleadstoanecessaryfocusonfixityandmaintainingthefixityoftheinformation.Ontheotherhand,recordsoriginateandexistovertimeindynamicenvironments,anddocumentingasfullyaspossibleboththecomplexoriginsandongoinghistoryisessentialforbothevaluatingtheevidentiaryqualityofrecords,andforunderstandingthem.

ComprehensivedescriptionassuggestedinRIC-CMisessentialfortheeffectivepreservationofrecords.1.6.3OngoingUseandReuseofRecords

Thedescriptioncreatedtofacilitatemanagementandpreservationalsoservesthoseinterestedinrecordsaswitnessestolifeandworkactivities,topeople,tohuman-madeandnaturalevents,tothingsmade,thingsstudied,thingsdone,andmore.Anythingandeverythingmaybethesubjectofrecords.Forpeoplewhowanttouserecordsasevidenceforscholarly,business,personal,orotherpurposes,descriptionfacilitatesdiscovering,locating,identifying,retrieving,evaluating,andunderstandingthem.Suchongoinguseandreuseoftherecordsbecomespartofthehistoryoftherecords;itre-contextualizesthem.Theuseandreusegenerateotherrecords,therebyextendingthesocial-documentnetwork.

ComprehensivedescriptionassuggestedinRIC-CMisessentialfortheeffectiveuseandreuseofrecords.1.7RecordDescriptioninTransition

ThepredominantformofarchivaldescriptionisbasedonthetraditionalunderstandingofthePrincipleofProvenance.Thepredominantformisalargely(ifnotexclusively)self-contained,inward-lookinghierarchicaldescriptionofasinglefonds.Thedescriptionbeginswithadescriptionofthefonds,andproceedstodescribethecomponentsofthefonds,andthesubcomponentsofthecomponents,andsoon.Whilethehierarchymayterminateinthedescriptionofanindividualrecord,itcommonlydoesnot.Suchdescriptionsarecurrentlycreatedandmaintainedusingavarietyofcommunicationtechnologies(forexample,wordprocessors,databases,orEncodedArchivalDescription(EAD10)XML-encodeddocuments)butallanticipatetheproductionofthetraditionalprintfindingaid,oranonlinepresentationthatismoreorlessananalogueofit.

10Forfurtherinformationseehttps://www.loc.gov/ead/<accessed20/06/2016>

Page 16: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 8

ItisthismodelofarchivaldescriptionthatisembodiedinISAD(G).Thefonds-downdescriptionprescribedinISAD(G)containsadescriptionofthefondsanddependentaggregationsofrecords,aswellasadescriptionoftheperson,corporatebody,orfamilythatcreated,accumulatedandusedtherecords,andtheholdingrepository.Descriptionoftherecordsandthecontextoftherecordsiscombinedinasingle,standalonedescription,withlittleornorelationtotheworldoutsideoftheimmediatecontext.

OverthecourseofthefourteenyearsfollowingthedevelopmentofISAD(G),threeotherstandardsweredeveloped:ISAAR-CPF,ISDF,andISDIAH.Theyenvisionedtheseparationofprimarycomponentsofthearchivaldescription(creator-accumulatorofafonds;thefunctionsthattherecordsaccumulateddocument;andtherepositorythatheldthefonds).Theseadditionalstandardswereintendedtoencouragethedevelopmentofsystemsofdescriptioninwhichthecomponentsofdescriptionswereseparatelymaintainedandinterrelated,andthenused,ondemand,toproducecompletearchivaldescriptionasithastraditionallybeenunderstood,andatthesametime,enableproducingnewandpotentiallypowerfulperspectivesthatfacilitatetheuseandunderstandingofrecords.

However,thefourstandardsweredevelopedindependentlyofoneanotheroveranextendedperiodoftimeandwithoutanoverarchingandpersistentvisionofhowsuchseparationwouldworkinpractice,andasaresultthestandardsdonotrepresentacoherent,consistentmodelofarchivaldescription.Ofthefourstandards,ISAD(G)hassignificantlyinfluencedinternationalarchivaldescriptivepractice,withISAAR(CPF)havingsomeuse,andbothISDFandISDIAHverylittle.EvenifnewtypesoffindingaidsandarchivaldescriptivesystemsbasedonthefourICAstandardshavebeendevelopedinthepasttenyears,thepredominantmodelofarchivaldescriptionremainsthefonds-downhierarchicaldescriptionprescribedinISAD(G).Foravarietyofreasons,itislikelytoremaintheprevailingapproachtoarchivaldescriptionforthenearfuture:itaddressesthetraditionalunderstandingofthePrincipleofProvenance;itiswellunderstoodbythecommunity;avarietyofexistingmethodsandsystemsexisttofacilitatecreation,maintenance,andpublication;andfinally,itisarelativelyeconomicapproachtoanexceptionallycomplex,labour-intensivechallenge.

Archivaldescription(andresourcedescriptioningeneral)isdependentonavailablecommunicationtechnologies.Asnewmethodsofrepresentingandcommunicatinginformationbecomeavailable,theyoffertheopportunitytore-envisionarchivaldescription.Thisre-envisioninggenerallyemphasizesseparatingandinterrelatingkeycomponentsofdescriptiontoaccommodatetheproductionoffamiliarandprovenmodesofaccessandatthesametimeopennewpathsintoandpresentnewperspectivesondescribedresources.Twointerdependentmotivationsfortheseparationarecommonlycited:improvingtheeconomyandaccuracyofdescription;andenhancingaccesstoandunderstandingofthedescribedresources.

Communicationtechnologiesthatemergedinthelasttwodecadesofthetwentiethcenturyhavegraduallybeentransformingthemethodsusedbyarchiviststodescribeandprovideaccesstothem.Bothmarkup(XMLandrelatedstandards)andrelational(SQL)technologies,inparticular,haveenabledmanyarchivestosuccessfullytransitionfrompaper-basedproductionoffindingaidstocomputer-basedproduction.

Aspowerfulasthetwotechnologieshavebeen,muchandperhapsmostrealworldinformationisnotrepresentedwellineitheroneortheother.Archivaldescription,particularlyinthesinglefonds-leveldescription,isadequatelybutnotoptimallyaccommodatedbydatabasetechnologiesinsomepartsandinotherpartsbymarkuptechnologies.Thatneithertechnologyclearlydominatesthearchival

Page 17: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 9

implementationlandscapereflectsthebetwixtandbetweennatureofthetraditionalsingledescription.Manydescriptionsystemsuseeitheroneortheotheroracarefullycraftedcombinationofthetwo.Technologicaldevelopmentswithinandbetweenthetwotechnologiesameliorateifnoteliminatetheweaknessofeachandthushelpsustaintheirdominanceovertherepresentationlandscape.But,giventhattherealworldwithinwhichweliveandworkmaybeunderstoodasavast,dynamicallyinterrelatednetworkofpeopleandobjectssituatedinspaceandtime,graphtechnologiesoffernewandmoreexpressiveformsofrepresentation.

Graphtechnologieshaveexistedinvariousformssincethe1960s,thoughtheirusedidnotbecomewidespreaduntilthelate1990swhentheW3CreleasedResourceDescriptionFramework(RDF11),astandardfortherepresentationofgraphdata.Graphtechnologiesintroducedatarepresentationasstatements,typicallycharacterizedassubject-predicate-object,witheachstatementcalleda“triple.”WhileXMLsupportsaspecificformofgraphs,thehierarchy(or“tree”),triplesenableunboundedrepresentationofnetworksofinterconnecteddataobjectsaswellasrealworldobjects(representedbydata).

Itiswithinthecontextofestablishedandemergingcommunicationtechnologies,andofanexpandedunderstandingofprovenance,thatRiC-CMisbeingdeveloped.RiC-CMisintendedtoaccommodateexistingdescriptionpracticesandatthesametimetoacknowledgenewunderstandings,andtopositionarchivestotakeadvantageofopportunitiespresentedbynewandemergingcommunicationtechnologies.RiC-CMaspirestoreflectbothfacetsofthePrincipleofProvenance,asthesehavetraditionallybeenunderstoodandpracticed,andatthesametimerecognizeamoreexpansiveanddynamicunderstandingofprovenance.Itisthismoreexpansiveunderstandingthatisembodiedintheword“Contexts.”RiC-CMisintendedtoenableafuller,ifforeverincomplete,descriptionofthecontextsinwhichrecordsemergeandexist,soastoenablemultipleperspectivesandmultipleavenuesofaccess.1.8FromISAD(G),ISAAR(CPF),ISDF,andISDIAHtoRiC-CM

RiC-CMincorporatesthefourexistingICAdescriptionstandards,ISAD(G),ISAAR(CPF),ISDF,andISDIAH.Intheprocessofintegratingandinterrelatingthefourexistingstandards,therehasbeenextensiveanalysisofeachoftheexistingstandards,andthishasledtofurtheridentificationanddifferentiationoftheprimarydescriptionentities,particularlywithaviewtowardshowtomostefficientlymaintainandinterrelatethemtoformcompletedescription.

Theprimarydescriptionentitiesare:

• Record• RecordComponent• RecordSet• Agent• Occupation• Position• Function• Function(Abstract)• Activity• Mandate

11Forfurtherinformationseehttps://www.w3.org/RDF/<accessed20/06/2016>

Page 18: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 10

• DocumentaryForm• Date• Place• Concept/Thing

GiventhatISAD(G)envisionsalldescriptionentitiesorcomponentscombinedinasingledescriptiveapparatus,RiC-CMmaybeunderstoodasembodyingallofISAD(G).Atthesametime,RiC-CMalsoincorporatesandfurtherdifferentiatesthedescriptionentitiesrepresentedintheotherthreeICAstandards.Forexample,AgentembodiesbothISAAR(CPF)andISDIAH,andFunctionandActivityembodiesISDF.1.8.1FromUnitofDescriptiontoRecordandRecordSet

AmainstayinISAD(G)is“unitofdescription.”ISAD(G)(andamajorportionoftheprofessionalliteratureondescription)assumesthatindividualrecordsandaggregationsofrecordsmaybeeachdescribedinthesameway,and,implicitly,thattheyarethesamekindofthing.Althoughinpracticearchivistshavelongrecognizedthatthisisnotthecase,therehasbeennoclearguidance,whichhasledtoconfusedandinconsistentdescription.RiC-CMtreatseachasadistinctkindofthing,andthoughtherearemanysharedproperties,themannerinwhichoneshouldbedescribedisnotthesameasthemannerinwhichtheothershouldbedescribed.Treatingeachasadistinctkindofthing,createdatdifferenttimesandfordifferentpurposes,enablesdescriptionthatisunambiguousandclear.1.8.2FromMultilevelDescriptiontoMultidimensionalDescription

AnadditionalmainstayofISAD(G)is“multileveldescription.”ISAD(G)isbasedona“multilevel”model.Thestandardassumes(thoughdoesnotprescribe)thatthescopeofasingledescriptionisafonds,andthatthedescriptionbeginswithadescriptionofthefonds,asasingleandcompleteentity,andmaythenproceedtodescribepartsofthewhole,andpartsoftheparts,alllinkedtogethertoformasingle,self-containedhierarchy.

RiC-CMmodelswhatmaybedescribedas“multidimensionaldescription.”Ratherthanahierarchy,thedescriptionmaytaketheformofagraphornetwork.Modellingdescriptionasagraphaccommodatesthesingle,fonds-based,multileveldescriptionmodelledinISAD(G),butalsoenablesaddressingthemoreexpansiveunderstandingofprovenancedescribedabove.Themultidimensionalmodelthusenablesthedescriptionofthefonds,butalsoseesthefondsexistinginabroadercontext,inrelationtootherfonds.Inamultidimensionalapproachtodescription,theRecordsandSetsofRecords,theirinterrelationswithoneanother,theirinterrelationswithAgents,Functions,Activities,Mandates,etc.,andeachofthesewithoneanother,arerepresentedasanetworkwithinwhichindividualfondsaresituated.Theproximatecontextofeachfondsisestablished,thoughitsboundariesarepermeable,asitexistswithinlayersofadditionalcontextcontainingotherfonds.ThemodelenablesthefulfilmentoftheRespectdesfonds,butalsoenablesaddressingothertypesofRecordSetswithcomplexorigination(forexample,aseriesthatdocumentsonefunctionthatisperformedseriallybyasuccessionofdifferentAgents).

WhileRiC-CMisamodelthatmakesitpossibletodescriberecordsandtheenvironmentsinwhichtheyarecreated,accumulated,used,andmanagedinawaythatmorefullycapturesandexpressesthecomplexcontextualrealitiesthancanbedoneusingasinglehierarchicaldescription,itdoesnotrepudiatehierarchicaldescriptionassuch.Infact,themodelassumesthatRecordSets,inadditionto

Page 19: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 11

thepossibilityofhavingindividualmemberRecords,mayalsohavememberRecordSets,hierarchicallyarranged,suchasahierarchythatrepresentsaseriesthatcontainssubseriesthatinturncontainfiles.

InthemodellingofRecordSet,specialcareistakentodistinguishbetweenthepropertiesandrelationsoftheRecordSetassuch,andindividualRecordscontainedintheSet.ARecordSet,forexample,hasitsownprovenance.WhiletheprovenanceoftheRecordSetmayberelatedtotheprovenanceofsomeifnotallofthecontainedRecords,theprovenanceoftheRecordSetisdistinctfromtheprovenanceofthecontainedRecords.Inotherwords,whilethecreatorofaRecordSetmaybethesameasthecreatorofallorsomeofthecontainedRecords,theactofcreatingtheRecordisdistinctfromtheactofcreatingtheRecordSet.

DescriptionoftheRecordscontainedinaRecordSetisfurtherdifferentiatedintotwocategories:summarydescriptionofthecontainedRecords(forexample,adaterangeforthespanoftimewithinwhichthecontainedRecordswerecreated),andthesharedpropertiesorrelationstheRecordshavethatdesignatethemasmembersofaRecordSet(forexample,allcontainedRecordsdocumentthesameFunction,orallsharethesameDocumentaryForm).

DistinguishingthekindsandscopeofpropertiesandrelationswithintheRecordSetisintendedtobringgreaterintellectualclaritytothedescriptionandtomakeitpossibletomakeexplicitandmachine-actionable“theinheritanceofdescription.”DescriptionoftheRecordSetassuch,andsummarydescriptionofthecontainedRecordsisonlyintellectuallyinheritableas“context”forthecontainedRecords.ThesummarypropertiesarenotpropertiesofthecontainedRecordsassuch,butanoverviewofthem,reducedtoanabstract.ThesharedpropertiesorrelationsrecordedattheleveloftheRecordSet,however,arelegitimatelypropertiesorrelationsofeachofthememberRecordsofaRecordSet.Forexample,ifalloftheRecordsinaRecordSetreflectaparticularFunction,thenthedescriptionofeachindividualRecordmayalsoincludearelationtotheFunction.1.9TransitiontoRiC-CM

ThoughRiC-CMaccommodatestheexistingpredominantdescriptionpracticethatiscodifiedinISAD(G),italsogoeswellbeyondthecurrentICAdescriptionstandards,bothconceptuallyandstructurally.RiC-CMisintendedtoprovidethesemanticandstructuralfoundationfordevelopingrecorddescriptionsystemsordescriptionmoduleswithinrecordsmanagementsystems.Itattemptstoidentifyandaccommodateawidevarietyofdescriptionandaccessneeds,andisintendedtobesufficientlydetailedandpreciseinthemodellingtosupportgraphandsemantictechnologies.

RiC-CMthusconceptuallydiffersfromandismuchmorecomplexanddetailedthantheexistingfourICAstandards.ItisanticipatedthatmasteringtheintellectualandtechnologicalcomplexityofRiC-CMbyrecordsmanagers,archivists,andthedevelopersofsystemsthatsupporttheirworkwilltaketime.Transitioningfromtheprevailingapproachtorecordsdescription(thesingle,stand-alonefonds-basedhierarchicaldescription)toamoreflexible,open,graph-ornetwork-basedapproachwillbegradual.

Archivesandlibraries,museums,andotherculturalheritageinstitutionswitharchivalholdingsvarygreatlyinsizeandresources,andtheyexistinmanydifferentsocialandpoliticalcontexts.IndevelopingRiC-CM,EGADrecognizesthatmanyinstitutionswillsimplynothavetheresourcestoimmediatelyembraceRiC-CM.Atthesametime,thereareinstitutionsthathavetheneedandmeanstobeginimplementingdescriptionbasedontheRiC-CMmodel,andtheseinstitutionswillbeabletocontribute

Page 20: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 12

feedbacktobenefittheongoingdevelopmentofRiC,andalso“topavetheway”forothers,demonstratingboththevalueoftheRiCmodel,andthemethodsrequiredtosuccessfullyimplementit.

DevelopersofrecordsmanagementandrecorddescriptionandaccesssystemswillalsobeessentialinthepromulgationandongoingdevelopmentofRiC.Developerswithagoodunderstandingofarchivalprinciplesandpractice,aswellascompetencyinthedevelopmentofrelationalandgraphtechnologieswillneedtodesignsystemsthatamelioratetheintellectual,technological,andeconomicchallengeofdatacreationandmaintenance.

EGADalsorecognizestheneedtodevelopImplementationGuidelines,anditisanticipatedthatsuchguidelineswillfollowthereleaseofstableversionsofRiC-CMandRiC-O.1.10Acknowledgements

ICAProgrammeCommission(PCOM)hasgenerouslyprovidedfundingforEGADmeetingsinBelgium(2013),Spain(2014),Romania(2015),andFrance(2016).InadditiontosupportfromthePCOM,theICASecretaryGeneralandotherstaffhaveprovidedbothmoralandlogisticsupporttoEGAD.LocalsupportformeetingswasprovidedbyArchivesgénéralesduRoyaume/AlgemeenRijksarchief(Belgium),ArxiuMunicipaldeGirona(Spain),ArhiveleNaţionalealeRomâniei,ArchivesnationalesdeFrance,andServiceinterministérieldesArchivesdeFrance.EGADmembers’homeinstitutionshavealsoprovidedmemberswithadditionalsupportforbothtravelandwork.

Page 21: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 13

2.Entities

# Name DefinitionRiC-E1Record Linguistic,symbolic,orgraphicinformationrepresentedinanypersistent

form,onanydurablecarrier,byanymethod,byanAgentinthecourseoflifeorworkeventsandActivities.

ScopeNotes Suchinformationmayserveavarietyofpurposes,includingdocumentingtheeventsandActivities.BecauseofitsrelationtotheeventsandActivities,itservesasevidenceforthemnomatteritsqualityforuseinaparticularcontext.OneormoreRecordsinonecontextmaybesubsumedorincorporatedintoaRecordinanothercontexttoformanewRecord.This‘compoundRecord’shouldnotbeconfusedwithaRecordSet,asitisevidenceofasingletransactionbyanAgentratherthanagroupingofdistinctRecordsaspartoftheirmanagementanduse.

Examples deedappointingJohnBambridge,SheriffofLeicestershire,with3rdGreatSealofCharlesIappended;sketchMapoftheQatarPeninsula;emailmessageconcerninganagreementtoparticipateintheICASeoulCongresscontainingtwoattachmentsanddigitallysigned

# Name DefinitionRiC-E2RecordComponent PartofaRecordwithdiscreteinformationcontentthatcontributestothe

Record'sphysicalorintellectualcompleteness.

ScopeNotes

Ifremovedthecompletenessoftherecordiscompromised.

Examples 3rdGreatSealofCharlesI;twodigitalphotographsattachedtoanemailmessage

# Name DefinitionRiC-E3RecordSet OneormoreRecordsthatareintellectuallybroughttogetheratsomeDate,

byanAgent,wherevertheRecordsmayresideandwhateverthesharedpropertiesorrelationsamongthemmaybe.

ScopeNotes Inaparticularcontext,anAgent(e.g.administrator,recordsmanager,archivist,end-user,etc.)selectsthememberRecordsofaRecordSetbasedonasharedpropertyorproperties,orasharedRelationorRelations.ThegroupingoftheRecordsservesapurposeorpurposesspecifictothecontextoftheAgent.Byexception,someRecordsarebroughttogetherbasedontheirnotbelonginginthecontextofselectiontootherdesignatedgroups:a‘Miscellaneous’seriesforexample.Theselectionandgrouping,forexample,mayrepresenttheactofclassifyingtheRecordsinaccordancewithaformalclassificationschemethatmaybebasedonfunction,subject,organizationalstructure,orothercriteria;anactofarchivalarrangement(e.g.basedoncommonprovenance);orsomeotherselectionandgroupingthatfulfilsaparticular

Page 22: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 14

purposeorpurposes(e.g.aclassificationthatreflectsorsupportsthepurposesofaresearcher).TheRecordSetcreatedbyanAgentinthecourseoflifeorworkeventsandActivitiesshouldbekeptinamannerthatpreservescontextandevidentialvalue.RecordsSetsmayalsocontainotherRecordsSets.BothaRecordSetandaRecordmaysimultaneouslybeamemberofmorethanoneRecordSet,andoverthecourseofitsexistence,aRecordSetorRecordmaybeamemberofanindeterminatenumberofRecordSetsinanindeterminatenumberofcontexts.RecordSetsandRecordscontainedwithinaRecordSetmaybeorderedintoasequencebasedonacommonpropertyorrelation,orcommonpropertiesorrelations(e.g.alphabeticalbyAgentorrelatedPlacename);chronologicalorderbyanallocatedDate;orsomeothercriterion(e.g.animposedorderbyrelevance).OneormoreRecordsinonecontextmaybesubsumedorincorporatedintoaRecordinanothercontexttoformanewRecord.Sucha‘compoundRecord’shouldnotbeconfusedwithaRecordSet.

Examples CottonManuscriptsCollection;miscellaneouspapersandfragments;papersoftheEarlsofLiverpool;officialcorrespondenceofthe1stEarlofLiverpool

# Name DefinitionRiC-E4Agent Apersonorgroup,oranentitycreatedbyapersonorgroup,thatis

responsibleforactionstakenandtheireffects.

ScopeNotes AnAgentisknownbyoneormoreidentities;anidentityisaconstellationofpropertiesorrelationsthattogether“identify”theAgent.Personsorgroupscommonlyhaveoneidentity,thoughtheyalsomayhaveoneormoreassumedorfictitiousidentities.Suchassumedidentitiesmaybesharedbymorethanonepersonorgroup.Assumedidentitiesincludebutarenotlimitedtopseudonyms,heteronyms,DBA(DoingBusinessAs),andtradeidentities.AnassumedidentityshouldnotbeconfusedwithPositionsincorporatebodies,forexample,presidents,primeministers,governors,popes,royalty,orbishops.Norshouldanassumedidentitybeconfusedwithavariantofthesameidentity.AgentalsoincludesentitiescreatedbyapersonorgroupthatactonbehalfofthecreatingAgentinanautonomousorsemi-autonomousmanner.ExamplesofsuchDelegate-Agentsaresoftwareagents,robots,andspaceandunderwaterprobesthatgeneratedata(records)infulfilmentofthefunctionassignedtoandtheinstructionsgiventothembythecreatingpersonorgroup.Typicallyarchivistswillwanttoattributeresponsibilityforactingtothepersonorpersons,orgrouporgroups‘behind’theassumedidentity,butdocumentationofassumedidentitiesandrelatingthemtothepersonsorgroupswhomtheyrepresentisimportantforseveralreasons:anassumed

Page 23: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 15

identitymaybetheonlyoneknownbyauser,andthusdocumentationofanassumedidentityandrelatingittothepersonorgroupidentityrepresentedbyitfacilitatesaccess;anassumedidentitymaybeasignificantcomponentofthehistoryofthepersonorgroupitrepresents;anassumedidentitymaybethesubjectofrecords;and,anassumedidentitymayelidethegivenidentityofthepersonorgroupitrepresents,thuseffectivelyeclipsingorreplacingthegivenidentity.

Examples AustralianHearingServices;GilbertandGeorge;LibraryandArchivesCanada;NelsonMandela;Noelfamily,ViscountsCampden;TheWho;FacultyofScience,UniversityofStrathclyde;France,MinistèredelaCultureetdelaCommunication,directiongénéraledespatrimoines

# Name DefinitionRiC-E5Occupation Aprofession,trade,orcraftpursuedbyapersoninfulfilmentofaFunction.

ScopeNotes ThepursuitofanOccupationinvolvestheperformanceofanActivityin

fulfilmentofaFunction.SuccessfulperformanceoftheActivityisbasedontheabilitytoperformsuccessfully(acompetency).Thiscompetencymaybeacquiredthrougheducationorexperience,oracombinationofboth.TheauthorityofthepersontopursuetheOccupationmaybederivedtacitlyorexplicitlyfromanexternalAgent,basedonademonstratedmasteryofthecompetency.OccupationshouldnotbeconfusedwithPosition,forexample,alawyerthatholdsthePositionoflegalcounselinanagency.ThoughOccupationisrelatedtoadomainorfieldofActivity,itshouldnotbeconfusedwiththisdomain,forexample,anarchivistworksinthedomainofarchivalscience.AnOccupationmaybepursuedindependentlybyaperson,orpursuedwithinagroup,contributingtothefulfillmentoftheFunctionofthegroup.

Examples archivist;doctor;lawyer;recordsmanager;teacher

# Name DefinitionRiC-E6Position Arolethatmaybeassignedtoaperson(ortoseveralpersons

simultaneously)withinacorporatebody,andthatexistsindependentlyoftheperson(s)whomayholdit.

ScopeNotes APositionisoftendefinedinaMandate,whichmayspecifytheFunctionsandcompetenciesnecessarytofulfillit,aswellastheActivitiestobeperformed.APositionisoftengivenatitle/name.APositionmaybetiedtoaprojectortoasetoftasksandthushaveadefinedduration.APositionmaychangeovertime,asthecorporatebodythatestablishesitchangesovertime.

Page 24: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 16

PositionisnottobeconfusedwithOccupation,whichisaprofession,trade,orcraftpursuedbyapersoninfulfilmentofaFunction;norwithFunction,whichistheAgent’sgoal;norwithActivity,whichisthesetsofactionsperformedbyanAgent.WithintheRecordscreatedbyacorporatebody,thePositionentitymaybeusedtoidentifytheRecordSetsresultingfromActivitiesperformedbypersonswhoholdaPositionovertime,withoutnecessarilyidentifyingordescribingthosepersons,oridentifyingwhichRecordswerecreatedbyeachofthem.

Examples head,presidentordirectorofacorporatebodyorunitofacorporatebody;executivemanager;technicaladvisor;assistantofadirector;gatekeeper;primeminister

# Name DefinitionRiC-E7Function Anenduringgoal,purpose,orobjectiveofanAgent.

ScopeNotes AFunctionexistsinaspecificsocialandculturalcontext,andwithinthat

contextissubjecttochangeovertime.ItshouldnotbeconfusedwithFunction(Abstract)whichdefinesaFunctionindependentofaparticularcontext.AFunctionmaybecomposedofotherFunctions.AFunctionmayberelatedtomorethanoneAgentsimultaneouslyorovertime.ThefulfilmentofaFunctionrequirestheperformanceofoneormoreActivities.BoththeFunctionandperformanceoftheActivitiesaregovernedbyoneormoreexplicitorimplicitMandates.

Examples teaching,UniversityofGlasgow;marketing,Army&NavyStoresLtd.;providinghearingservices,researchanddevelopment,andconductingeducationabouthearingservices,AustralianHearingServices

# Name DefinitionRiC-E8Function(Abstract) DesignationanddefinitionofaFunctionindependentoftheinstancesofthe

Functionthatisspecifictoaparticularsocialandculturalcontext.

ScopeNotes Function(Abstract)shouldnotbeconfusedwithFunction,whichdefinesthegoals,purposesorobjectivesofanAgentwithinitsspecificcontext.Function(Abstract)willbedefinedinbothglobalanddomain-specificvocabularies.

Examples financialbudgeting;fundraising;hearingservices;research;teaching;marketing;sales;humanresources

# Name DefinitionRiC-E9Activity AsetofcoordinatedactionsortransactionsperformedbyanAgentin

fulfilmentofaFunction,orinthepursuitofanOccupation.

Page 25: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 17

ScopeNotes Activitiesexistinaspecificsocialandculturalcontext,andwithinthatcontextaresubjecttochangeovertime.ActivitiesmaybecomposedofotherActivities.AnActivitymaybeperformedinfulfilmentofoneormoreFunctionsorinthepursuitofoneormoreOccupations,bymorethanoneAgentatthesametimeorovertime.TheperformanceoftheActivitiesisgovernedbyoneormoreexplicitorimplicitMandates.

Examples financialaccounting,UniversityofGlasgow;fundraisingcampaignmanagement,UniversityofGlasgow

# Name DefinitionRiC-E10Mandate AuthorityorrulesthatgoverntheactionsofanAgentwithinaspecificsocial

andculturalcontext.

ScopeNotes AMandatespecifiesorauthorizestheFunctions(goals)ofanAgent(who);ortheActivitiestobeperformedbyanAgentinfulfillmentoftheFunction(means);orthepoliciesorproceduresthatgoverntheperformanceoftheActivity(how);andthePlace(jurisdiction)andDate(timeperiod)withinwhichanAgentmayperformtheActivities(whereandwhen).AMandateestablishestherulesthatgoverntheactionsandconfertheauthorityorcompetenciesofAgentstofulfilldesignatedFunctionsorperformdesignatedActivities.Mandatesexistinaspecificsocialandculturalcontext,andwithinthatcontextaresubjecttochangeovertime.WhileaMandatemaybetacit,inwholeorpart,itmaybeexplicitlyexpressedinavarietyofdocumentarysources(forexample,constitutions,legislation,(legal)acts,statutes,legalcodes,ordinances,charges,charters,missionstatements,regulations,policies,procedures,orstandards).ThesourceorsourcesofsomeMandatesareexternaltotheAgent(forexample,expressedinelections,socialmores,customs,communityexpectations,laws,regulations,standardsandbestpracticecodes),whileothersareexpressedwithintheAgent’simmediatecontext(forexample,policies,orwrittenorverbalinstructions).TheevidenceforidentifyingaMandatemaybefoundinitsentiretyinonedocumentarysource(forexample,alaworregulation),ormaybefoundintwoormoresources.AMandateshouldnotbeconfusedwiththeoneormoredocumentarysourcesthatserveasevidenceofitsidentity.

Examples authoritygrantedbyelectorstoapersontorepresenttheminParliament;authorityofaMayortograntbuildingauthorisations;rulesset

Page 26: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 18

outinRecordsinContext:AConceptualModelforArchivalDescription,adocumentpublishedbytheInternationalCouncilonArchives(ICA)whichdefineshowanarchivistdescribesarchivalmaterial;themandateoftheAustralianHearingServices,assetoutbytheAustralianHearingServicesAct1991(s7),istoprovidehearingservices,carryoutresearchanddevelopmentinrelationtohearingservicesandacousticdevelopment,andconducteducationabouthearingservices,inadditiontoanyotherfunctionsconferredontheAuthority(s8).ThepowertoperformthesefunctionsisexercisedbytheAuthority(s9)abodycorporategovernedbyaBoardofDirectors(ss7,13,14,15and16),whichissubjecttothedirectionoftheMinisterforHumanServices(s12).TheManagingDirectormanagestheAuthority,undertheBoard(s42).(Adaptedfromsource:https://www.humanservices.gov.au/corporate/about-us/legislation)

# Name DefinitionRiC-E11DocumentaryForm TherulesusedinthecreationofaRecordthatprescribestheparticular

physicalorintellectualelementsthatmustbepresent.

ScopeNotes TheDocumentaryFormplaysanimportantroleindeterminingthetypeofinformationaRecordmaycomprise,itsstatusofperfection,anditsauthenticityandreliability.Documentaryformsexistinaspecificsocialandculturalcontext,andwithinthatcontextaresubjecttochangeovertime.

Examples deedofgift;email;letter;papalbull;charter;letterspatent;birthcertificate;will

# Name DefinitionRiC-E12Date Chronologicalinformationassociatedwithanentitythatcontributestoits

identificationandcontextualization.

ScopeNotes --

Examples 1925-1957;20thCentury;3HenryVIII;4March1842;9ThermidorAnII;c.1860s

# Name DefinitionRiC-E13Place Jurisdictionsandanygeographicoradministrativepointorarea.

ScopeNotes Includessettlementsofanykind(towns,villages,etc.),historicalregions,

andpoliticalandadministrativedistricts.

Examples AmazonRiver;NovaScotia;Paris;NorthLanarkshireDistrict;ManchesterDiocese;RugbyUrbanSanitaryDistrict

# Name DefinitionRiC-E14Concept/Thing

Anyideaornotion,materialthing,oreventoroccurrencethatcanbeassociatedwith,orinsomecasesbethesubjectof,otherentities.

Page 27: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 19

ScopeNotes IncludesallRiCentitiesaswellasthefollowing:abstractconcepts;culturalmovements,namedperiodsandevents;namedthings,objectsandworks;legendary,mythicalorfictitiousfigures,charactersorbeings.

Examples airplanes;BattleoftheSomme;impressionism;Puck;renaissance;slavery;BeforeChristianEra(BCE);FrenchRevolution

Page 28: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 20

Page 29: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 21

3.PropertiesofEntities

3.1SharedPropertiesofallEntities

# Name DefinitionRiC-P1GlobalPersistentIdentifier Globallyuniqueandpersistentlyresolvableidentifierfortheentity.

Scope --

DataType URI

Examples http://n2t.net/ark:/99166/w6v1266v[exampleofanArchivalResourceKey

persistentidentifierforaRecord];http://isni.org/0000000073572182[exampleofapersistentInternationalStandardNameIdentifierforaperson]

# Name DefinitionRiC-P2LocalIdentifier Localidentifier(s)assignedtotheentity.

Scope ThiscoversallidentifiersotherthanGlobalPersistentIdentifiers.

DataType Text

Examples BUD-01-F002[exampleofaclassificationnumberfromacorporatefileplan];

NAS1/A/1.1[exampleoflocalidentifierforaRecord];F1204[exampleofalocalidentifierforaRecordSetassignedbyarepository]

# Name DefinitionRiC-P3Name Atitleortermdesignatingtheentity.

Scope

--

DataType Text,orControlledPhrase,orControlledTerm,orControlledFormat

Examples 4March1842;2016-08-24[DateformattedaccordingtoISO8601];deedofgift;doctor;fundraising,UniversityofGlasgow;hearingservices;NelsonMandela;PapersoftheEarlsofLiverpool;Paris;primeminister;SketchMapoftheQatarPeninsula

# Name DefinitionRiC-P4GeneralNote Descriptionoftheentitythatisnototherwiseaddressed.

Scope IncludesinformationontherelationoftheentitytoanyotherRiCentitythat

isnototherwiseprovided.

DataType Text

Examples --

Page 30: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 22

3.2PropertiesofRecord3.2.1ContentInformation# Name DefinitionRiC-P5AuthenticityandIntegrityNote

DescriptionoffeaturesoftheRecordattestingtohowitisgenuine,reliable,trustworthy,wholeandcomplete.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples therecordmissingitslowerleftcorneroftextandbearsthesealoftheKing;therecordiselectronicallysignedandthesignatureisvalidatthemomentofdescription;thedatabase(.dbf)filehasthechecksumSHA-1:bb165836546e13c8d80e97aa44e8f4369608e9f8

# Name DefinitionRiC-P6ContentType ThefundamentalformofcommunicationinwhichaRecordisexpressedand

thehumansensethroughwhichitisintendedtobeperceived.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples cartographicimage;notatedmusic;spokenword;stillimage;text

# Name DefinitionRiC-P7ContentExtent CountablecharacteristicsofthecontentoftheRecord,expressedasa

quantity.

Scope Contentextentinformationisindependentofcarrierextentinformation;thenumber,sizeordurationofthecontentunit(s)wouldremainthesameevenifthenumberorsizeofthecarriersitwascontainedondiffered.

DataType Text

Examples duration:3minutesand24seconds;6maps;34poems

# Name DefinitionRiC-P8QualityofInformation ConditionsofaRecordthatimpactthelegibilityorcompletenessofits

information,andthustheviabilityofitsuse.

Scope SuchconditionsmaybeassociatedwithdeficienciesintheprocessesofRecordcreationorcapture,orthedeteriorationoftheRecord(e.g.itscarrier)causinglossofinformationovertime.

DataType Text

Examples somelossofinformationduetopoorqualityimagecapture;somelossoftextduetorodentdamage

Page 31: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 23

# Name DefinitionRiC-P9ScopeandContent Summaryofthescope(suchas,timeperiods,geography)andcontent(such

assubjectmatter,administrativeprocesses)oftheRecord.

Scope MayincludedescriptionofrelationswithAgents,otherRecords,Functions,Activities,DatesandPlaces.MayalsoincludedescriptionofcomponentsoftheRecordwhenconsideredsignificantandnotconsideredseparately.

DataType Text

Examples IncludesadetailedlistofthelandsandvillagesgivenbytheKingtotheAbbey;amongthewitnesses,thedukeofNormandy;theauthorexplainswhyhedoesnotagreewiththedecisionmadeandaddsthatitcannotbeapplied

3.2.2InformationaboutRepresentation# Name DefinitionRiC-P10EncodingFormat Informationaboutthelogicalformofdigitallyrepresentedcontent.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm(Mimetypes:http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-

types/media-types.xhtml)

Examples text/csv;image/tiff;audio/mp4;application/pdf

# Name DefinitionRiC-P11LanguageInformation AspokenorwrittenhumanlanguagerepresentedintheRecords.

Scope Informationincludesthelanguage,thescriptofthelanguage,andthescript

transliterationschemewhenappropriate.MorethanonelanguagemayberepresentedinaRecord.

DataType ControlledCodeorTerm(ISO639Codesfortherepresentationofnamesoflanguages;ISO15924Codesfortherepresentationofnamesandscripts)

Examples Languages:Arabic(ara);Chinese(chi)English(eng);French(fre);Spanish(spa)Scripts:Arabic(Arab);Han(Hans);Latin(Latn)Transliterationscheme:ISO233-2:1993Informationanddocumentation-TranslationofArabiccharactersintoLatincharacters-Part2:Arabiclanguage-Simplifiedtransliteration;ISO843:1997Informationanddocumentation--ConversionofGreekcharactersintoLatincharacters

# Name DefinitionRiC-P12MediaType Thegeneraltypeofintermediationdevicerequiredtorenderthecontentofa

Record.

Scope --

Page 32: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 24

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples audio;computer;microform;unmediated;video

# Name DefinitionRiC-P13ProductionTechnique ThemethodusedintherepresentationofinformationontheRecordcarrier.

Scope --

DataType TextorControlledTerm

Examples manuscription(handwriting);engraving;magneticrecording;optical

recording

3.2.3InformationaboutCarrier# Name DefinitionRiC-P14Medium Physicalmaterialinoronwhichinformationisrepresented.

Scope Includesphysicalcarriersinoronwhichinformationisrepresentedthatdo

notrequireanintermediationdevice.

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples claytablets;papyrus;magneticdisk;opticaldisk;paper;parchment;film;vinyldisk;magnetictape

# Name DefinitionRiC-P15PhysicalorLogicalExtent Numberofphysicalunitsand/orphysicaldimensionsofRecordcarriersor,in

thecaseofdigitalmediacarriers,thesizeofstoragespaceoccupied.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples 1page;5folios;17x34.5cm;1USBstick;3GB

# Name DefinitionRiC-P16PhysicalCharacteristicsNote

InformationaboutthephysicalcharacteristicsoftheRecord.

Scope Includesinformationaboutthephysicalnatureandconditionsuchasconservationstatus.

DataType Text

Examples Recordheavilyfoxed;emulsionflaking;watermarked;BritishLibrarybinding

3.2.4InformationaboutManagementandUse# Name DefinitionRiC-P17Classification InformationonthecriterionorcriteriathatmaybeusedtoidentifyaRecord

Page 33: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 25

asamemberofaRecordSet.

Scope Thisinformationmaybeintheformoftext,oratermorcodemaintainedinaclassificationscheme.ThecriterionorcriteriamayberepresentedinaRiCpropertyorthrougharelation,forexample,toaDocumentaryFormoraFunction(Abstract).TheRecordssharingthispropertyorrelationincommonidentifythemasmembersofaparticularRecordSet.

DataType TextorControlledCodeorTerm

Examples BUD-01-F002[exampleofaclassificationnumberfromacorporatefileplan];humanresourcemanagement;studentregistration;financialaffairs;digitization

# Name DefinitionRiC-P18ConditionsofAccess ConditionsaffectingtheavailabilityofaRecordforconsultation.

Scope Suchconditionsmaybelaws,regulationsandpolicies,includingpoliciesand

requirementspertainingtoprivacy,securityconcernsorrestrictions;ortheymaypertaintothephysicalstateoftheRecord,forexample,conditionsthatrequirepreservationtreatment;ortheymayspecifyanysoftware/hardwarenecessarytoaccesstheRecord.

DataType Text

Examples Open;Closedunderdataprotectionlegislation;Closedasawaitingconservationtreatment;

# Name DefinitionRiC-P19ConditionsofUse ConditionsaffectingtheavailabilityoftheRecordforuseafteraccesshas

beenprovided.

Scope IncludesconditionsgoverningreproductionoftheRecordunderapplicablecopyright(intellectualproperty)orpropertylegislation.

DataType Text

Examples freelyusablewithoutrestrictions;thepermissionoftheowneroftheRecordmustbeobtainedbeforeuse

# Name DefinitionRiC-P20History AnaccountofthehistoryoftheRecord.Totheextentknown,thismaycover

theentirehistoryoftheRecordfromitsinceptiontothedateofthedescription.

Scope Thehistorymayincludeeventsassociatedwithcustody,actionstakenontheRecordaspartofitsmanagement(appraisal,description,classificationandreclassification,datastoragemigration,encodingtypeconversions,andsoon)thathavecontributedtoitsstateatthetimeofdescription.Whenknown,provideDatesofandAgentsassociatedwiththeevents.

Page 34: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 26

DataType Text

Examples --

# Name DefinitionRiC-P21RecordState DescriptionoftheproductionorreproductionstatusoftheRecord.

Scope --

DataType TextorControlledTerm

Examples draft;finaldraft;original;simplecopy;certifiedcopy

3.3PropertiesofRecordComponentEditor’sNote:Inmanycases,describingatthecomponentlevelwillberareduetopracticalresourceconstraints,andparticularlywherethewholeRecordexistsandisdescribed.However,insomecases,descriptionsforseparatedRecordComponentsmayberequired.Inthissituation,allpropertiesidentifiedins.4.2forRecordapply.WhilethisdraftreleaseoftheRiCCMdoesnotincludedetailsforeachpropertyasitwouldapplytoaRecordComponent,afutureversionoftheRiCCMwouldincludethisinformation,aswellasexamplesofeachpropertyasappliedtoaRecordComponent.3.4PropertiesofRecordSet# Name DefinitionRiC-P22AuthenticityandIntegrityNote

DescriptionoffeaturesoftheRecordSetattestingtohowitisgenuine,reliable,trustworthy,wholeandcomplete.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P23Type AbroadcategorizationofthetypeofRecordSet.

Scope ForlegacypurposesthistypeistheequivalentoftheLevelofDescription

elementinISAD(G)(3.1.4)exceptforthevalue“item”,whichequatestotheRecordentityinRiC.RecordSetTypemaybeextendedtoreflecttypesofRecordSetsthatarenotarchival.

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples fonds;series;file;class;piece;collection;accrual;accession;project

Page 35: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 27

# Property DefinitionRiC-P24AccrualNote InformationonanticipatedaccessionstotheRecordSet.

Scope SuchaccessionsmaybesingleRecordsorRecordSets.

DataType Text

Examples Thereisanagreementwiththecreatorthatadditionalsnapshotsoftheire-

maildirectorywillbeaccessionedatyearlyintervals.

# Property DefinitionRiC-P25AccrualStatus WhetherornottheRecordSetisopenforadditionalaccessionsofRecordsor

RecordSets.

Scope ClosedindicatesthatnoadditionalRecordsorRecordSetswill(orareanticipatedto)beaddedtotheRecordSet.OpenindicatesthatadditionalRecordsorRecordSetswill(orareexpectedto)beaddedtotheRecordSet.

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples closed;open;unknown

# Property DefinitionRiC-P26Arrangement CriteriaandprinciplesusedtoordertheRecordsorRecordsSetswithinthe

RecordSet.

Scope Encompassesonlyintellectualarrangementinformation.Physicalarrangementinformationisoutofscope.

DataType Text

Examples arrangedaccordingtothealphabeticalorderoftheplacesconcerned;arrangedchronologically

# Property DefinitionRiC-P27Classification Informationonthecriterionorcriteriausedinselectingthemembersofthe

RecordSet.

Scope Thisinformationmaybeintheformoftext,oratermorcodemaintainedinaclassificationscheme.ThecriterionorcriteriamayberepresentedinaRiCpropertyorrelationthatissharedbythemembersintheRecordSet.ThissharedpropertyorrelationmaybelongtoboththeRecordandRecordSet,andmayalsobeinheritedbydescendantmembersofaRecordSet.Itdependsonhowitisrepresentedinthedescription:ifitisadescriptionofthecriteriausedinformingorassemblingtheRecordSet,thenitisapropertyoftheRecordSet;ifitisatermorcodethatappliestoalldescendantRecords,thenitisamongthepropertiesthataresharedbythedescendantRecords.

Page 36: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 28

DataType TextorControlledCodeorTerm

Examples BUD-01-F002[exampleofaclassificationnumberfromacorporatefileplan];humanresourcemanagement;studentregistration;financialaffairs;digitization

# Property DefinitionRiC-P28History

AnaccountofthehistoryoftheRecordSet.Totheextentknown,thismaycovertheentirehistoryoftheRecordSetfromitsinceptiontothedateofthedescription.

Scope Totheextentknown,thehistorymaycovertheentirehistoryoftheRecordSetfromitsinceptiontothedateofthedescription.SignificantEventsincludebutarenotlimitedtocreationorformationoftheRecordSet,transfersofcustodyorownership,changesincustodialresponsibility,changesinthearrangement,additions(accruals)orremovingorseparationofmemberRecordsorRecordSets,andusesoftheRecordSet.DescriptionoftheeventsshouldincludeAgent(s),theDate(s)oftheevent(s),andthePlace(s)wheretheevent(s)occurred.RecordSetsarenotstatic,themembershipisdynamic,thatismemberRecordsmaycomeandgo.SignificantchangesinclassificationwouldconstitutetheformulationofnewRecordSets.

DataType Text

Examples ThemanuscriptsarepartofthecollectionsofRobertHarley(d1724)andEdwardHarley(d1741),1stand2ndEarlsofOxford,thatwerebroughtbyParliamentandtransferredtotheBritishMuseumin1753.ThosematerialswerethenseparatedintothiscollectionandthoseforHarleyChartersandHarleyRollsandbecamepartofthecollectionsoftheBritishLibraryin1972.

3.5PropertiesSummarizingtheMembersofaRecordSet# Property DefinitionRiC-P29ContentExtent CountablecharacteristicsofthecontentoftheRecordSet,expressedasa

quantity.

Scope Contentextentinformationisindependentofcarrierextentinformation;thenumber,sizeordurationofthecontentunit(s)wouldremainthesameevenifthenumberorsizeofthecarriersitwascontainedondiffered.

DataType Text

Examples duration:3minutesand24seconds;6photographs;2films;6maps

# Property DefinitionRiC-P30PhysicalorLogicalExtent

Numberofphysicalunitsand/orphysicaldimensionsofRecordSetcarriersor,inthecaseofdigitalmediacarriers,thesizeofstoragespaceoccupied.

Page 37: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 29

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples 40pages;5folios;25m2;1USBstick;35GB

# Property DefinitionRiC-P31ScopeandContent Summaryofthescope(suchas,timeperiods,geography)andcontent(such

ascontenttype,documentaryforms,subjectmatter,administrativeprocesses)ofthememberRecordsorRecordSets.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

3.6PropertiesSharedbyAllMemberRecordsofaRecordSetEditor’snote:Thefollowingproperties,whichhavethesamedefinitionsasthosegivenforRecord,maybeusedwhentheyaresharedbyallmemberRecordsofaRecordSet:

• RiC-P6ContentType• RiC-P10EncodingFormat• RiC-P11LanguageInformation• RiC-P12MediaType• RiC-P13ProductionTechnique• RiC-P14Medium• RiC-P17ConditionsofAccess• RiC-P18ConditionsofUse• RiC-P20RecordState

MembersofaRecordSetmustshareatleastonecommonproperty(thebasisforformingtheset);theymayallsharemorethanonecommonproperty.

3.7PropertiesSharedbyAllAgents# Property DefinitionRiC-P32Type SpecifickindofAgent.

Scope Thetopleveltypesdefinegroups(includingfamilies,corporatebodiesand

conferences),personsanddelegate-agentscreatedbyapersonorgroupthatactonbehalfofthecreatingAgentinanautonomousorsemi-autonomousmanner.Ifthetypeisunknownthatthisshouldbestated.Eachtypemaybeextendedtocovermorespecificcategorization,forexample,todistinguishbetweenpublicandprivatecorporatebodies,ortospecifythelegalstatusoftheAgentaccordingtosomeinternationalorlocalscheme.

Page 38: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 30

NotallpropertiesunderAgentapplytoalltypes.

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples group;corporatebody;conference;family;person;delegate-agent;unknown

# Property DefinitionRiC-P33IdentityType ThespecifickindofidentityofanAgent.

Scope Agivenidentityistheidentitythatiscommonlyconsideredtheidentityof

the‘real’Agent.Anassumedidentityisanidentityinventedbyoneormore‘real’Agents,withthe‘real’AgentorAgentsactingundertheguiseoftheassumedidentity.

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples given;individualassumed;jointassumed;unknown

# Property DefinitionRiC-P34LanguageInformation AspokenorwrittenhumanlanguageusedbytheAgent.

Scope Informationincludesthelanguage,thescriptofthelanguage,andthescript

transliterationschemewhenappropriate.AnAgentmayuseoneormorelanguage.

DataType ControlledCodeorTerm(ISO639Codesfortherepresentationofnamesoflanguages;ISO15924Codesfortherepresentationofnamesandscripts)

Examples Languages:Arabic(ara);Chinese(chi)English(eng);French(fre);Spanish(spa)Scripts:Arabic(Arab);Han(Hans);Latin(Latn)Transliterationscheme:ISO233-2:1993Informationanddocumentation-TranslationofArabiccharactersintoLatincharacters-Part2:Arabiclanguage-Simplifiedtransliteration;ISO843:1997Informationanddocumentation--ConversionofGreekcharactersintoLatincharacters

# Property DefinitionRiC-P35History ConcisehistoryoftheAgent.

Scope Historymayincorporatethegeneralsocial,cultural,oreconomiccontextin

whichtheAgentlivedorexistedwhensuchcontextaidsinunderstandingtheAgent’sFunctions,Occupations,PositionsorActivities.

DataType Text

Examples --

Page 39: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 31

3.8AdditionalPropertySpecifictoPersonandPersonAssumedIdentity# Property DefinitionRiC-P36Gender Thegenderwithwhichaperson(orpersonassumedidentity)identifies.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples male;female;unknown

3.9AdditionalPropertySpecifictoDelegate-Agent# Property DefinitionRiC-P37TechnicalCharacteristics Descriptionofthetechnicalcharacteristicsofthedelegate-Agent.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

3.10AdditionalPropertiesSpecifictoCorporateBodyandCorporateBodyAssumedIdentity# Property DefinitionRiC-P38ServicestothePublic Descriptionofpublicservicespolicies,inparticularwithrespectto

qualificationstousetheservices,andrights,privileges,andresponsibilitiesofusersoftheservices.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P39ContactInformation Contactinformationtorequestinformationaboutavailablepublicservices,

servicepolicies,andsoon.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples 29cheminduMoulinDetesta13090Aix-en-Provence(France)Siteweb:http://www.archivesnationales.culture.gouv.fr/caom/fr/index.htmlFrance.DirectiondesArchivesdeFranceNote:FortheinstitutionArchivesnationalesd’outre-mer

Page 40: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 32

Téléphone:+33(0)442933850Télécopie:+33(0)442933899Adresseélectronique:[email protected]:FortheinstitutionArchivesnationalesd’outre-merCoordenaçãoRegionalnoDistritoFederal,emBrasília(COREG):SIG–Q6Lote800–AnexoaoprédiodaImprensaNacional70610-460–Brasília–DFBrasilwww.arquivonacional.gov.brBrazil.ArquivoNacionalNote:FortheinstitutionArquivoNacional

# Property DefinitionRiC-P40OperatingHours DaysandhoursofdayduringwhichpublicservicesofanAgentareavailable.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples Open:Mon-Fri9.15-4.45;Sat9.15-12.30,1.30-4.30.LateopeningThursto

7.30pmClosed:OneweekearlyDecemberUnitedKingdom,TheNationalArchivesNote:FortheinstitutionWestSussexRecordOfficeAperturaalpúblico:LunesaViernesde8.00am-15.00pmHorasdeAperturaSemanales:35Cerradoalpúblico:SábadosyDomingos.Festivos:1y6deenero,28defebrero,JuevesyViernesSanto,1mayo,30demayo,CorpusChristi,15deagosto,1denoviembre,6,8,24,25y31dediciembre.Spain.SubdirecciónGeneraldelosArchivosEstatalesNote:FortheinstitutionArchivoGeneraldeIndias

# Property DefinitionRiC-P41Facilities DescriptionofphysicalfacilitieswhereanAgentprovidespublicservices.

Scope Includesissuesofphysicalaccessibility,suchaswheelchairaccess,andother

provisionsforuserswithphysicaldisabilities.

DataType Text

Examples --

3.11PropertiesofOccupation# Property DefinitionRiC-P42Type CategorizationoftheOccupation.

Scope --

Page 41: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 33

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples healthprofessionals;legalprofessionals;serviceandsalesworkers

# Property DefinitionRiC-P43Description DescriptionoftheOccupationincludingtheFunctionsfulfilledandthe

Activitiesinvolved.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P44History ConcisehistoryoftheOccupationanditschangesovertime,including

changesconcerningtherulesgoverningitandthepersonswhopursuedit.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

3.12PropertiesofPosition# Property DefinitionRiC-P45Type CategorizationofthePositionusingeitheralistoftypesestablishedexternal

toorwithintheinstitution.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples academic;administrativeandprofessional;operational;technical

# Property DefinitionRiC-P46Description DescriptionofthePositionasdefinedbyandwithinthecontrollingcorporate

body.

Scope TheremitofthePosition.

DataType Text

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P47History HistoryofthePosition,ofitscreationanddefinition,andofitschangesover

time,includingchangesconcerningthecompetenciesrequired,theauthorityandFunctionsassigned,andthepersonsholdingthePosition.

Page 42: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 34

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

3.13PropertiesofFunction# Property DefinitionRiC-P48Type CategorizationoftheFunction.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples function;sub-function

# Property DefinitionRiC-P49Description Descriptionofthenature,scopeandmeaningoftheFunction.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples Thefunctionofundertakingacademicresearchcoverstheconductofall

academicresearch,whetheritisfundedbytheuniversityitself,byexternalorganizations,orbyboth.Italsocoversresearchundertakenincollaborationwithotherinstitutions[exampleforresearch,UniversityofStrathclyde].

# Property DefinitionRiC-P50History Historyoforiginanddevelopmentofthegoals,purposes,orobjectives

definedinaFunction.

Scope InformationmayincludedescriptionoftheroleorrolesplayedbyAgentsinauthorizingorfulfillingtheFunctionandhowtheychangedovertime,andtheActivitiesperformedinfulfillmentoftheFunction.

DataType Text

Examples --

3.14PropertyofFunction(Abstract)# Property DefinitionRiC-P51Description DefinitionoftheFunction(Abstract).

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples Thesystematicinvestigationintoandstudyofmaterialsandsourcesinorder

Page 43: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 35

toestablishfactsandresearchnewconclusions[examplefor‘research’].

3.15PropertiesofActivity# Property DefinitionRiC-P52Type CategorizationoftheActivity.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples activity;businessprocess;action;task;transaction

# Property DefinitionRiC-P53Description Descriptionofcoordinatedactionsortransactionsperformedinfulfillmentof

aFunction,orpursuitofanOccupation.

Scope IncludesdescriptionofconstituentActivities.Informationmayincludedescriptionofprocesses,plans,procedures,methods,andtoolsthatcontributetoanunderstandingofanActivity.

DataType Text

Examples Tasksinvolvedindevelopingandestablishingtheuniversity’sresearchstrategyinclude:identifyingrequirementsforaneworrevisedstrategy;undertakingresearch;developingstrategyproposals;consultingonstrategyproposals;reviewingandrevisingstrategyproposalsinlightofcommentsreceived;draftingstrategydocuments;consultingonstrategydocuments;reviewingdraftstrategydocumentsinlightofcommentsreceived;producingfinalstrategydocuments;submittingfinalstrategydocumentsforformalendorsement;formallyendorsingstrategydocuments;disseminatingstrategydocuments;reviewingstrategies[exampleforresearchstrategydevelopment,UniversityofStrathclyde].

# Property DefinitionRiC-P54History HistoryoforiginanddevelopmentoftheActivity.

Scope InformationmayincludedescriptionofthePositionsheldbyAgentsin

authorizingorperformingtheActivityandhowtheychangedovertime;changesinhowtheActivitywasperformed;andchangesinActivities’constituentActivities.

DataType Text

Examples --

3.16PropertiesofMandate# Property DefinitionRiC-P55Type CategorizationoftheMandate.

Page 44: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 36

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples decree;legislation;rule;standard;letterofappointment

# Property DefinitionRiC-P56Description Informationdescribingtheauthority,Functions,Activities,policies,or

proceduresthatcomprisetheMandate;thejurisdictionallimitsandthetemporalperiodwithinwhichtheMandateiseffectiveorvalid;andtheAgentorAgentsthataregovernedbytheMandate.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P57History InformationdescribingtheoriginanddevelopmentoftheMandate.

Scope SuchinformationincludesdescriptionoftheAgentorAgentsthat

participatedinthecreationordevelopmentoftherulesthatcomprisetheMandate;revisionofthejurisdictionallimitsortemporalperiodwithinwhichtheMandateiseffectiveorvalid;andchangesintheAgentorAgentsthatarecontrolledorguidedbytheMandate.

DataType Text

Examples --

3.17PropertiesofDocumentaryForm# Property DefinitionRiC-P58Type CategorizationoftheDocumentaryForm.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples longplayingrecord(LP);charter;register

# Property DefinitionRiC-P59Description DescriptionoftheDocumentaryFormincludingitsmainextrinsicand

intrinsiccharacteristics.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

Page 45: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 37

# Property DefinitionRiC-P60History HistoryoftheDocumentaryFormincludingthecontextinwhichitfirst

appearedoritsusagedeveloped,inwhichitwasused,itschangesovertime,andtheAgentswhousedit.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

3.18PropertiesofDate# Property DefinitionRiC-P61Type CategorizationoftheDate.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples single;range

# Property DefinitionRiC-P62Calendar CalendarwithwhichtheliteralexpressionoftheDate(Dateasexpressedand

understoodbyhumanAgents)isexpressed.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples Gregorian;FrenchRevolutioncalendar

3.19PropertiesofPlace# Property DefinitionRiC-P63Type AnindicationofthecategoryofPlace,especiallytodistinguishnaturaland

humannotions.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTermorPhrase

Examples settlement;administrativedivision;country;mountain;river

# Property DefinitionRiC-P64GeographicCoordinates LongitudinalandlatitudinalinformationofthePlace.

Scope --

DataType ControlledCodeorTerm(ISO6709Standardrepresentationofgeographic

Page 46: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 38

pointlocationbycoordinates)

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P65Address PhysicallocationofthePlace.

Scope Includesanylocationinformationexclusiveofgeographiccoordinates.

DataType Text

Examples 59rueGuynemer,F-93383Pierrefitte-sur-SeineCedex

3.20PropertiesofConcept/Thing# Property DefinitionRiC-P66Type CategorizationoftheConcept/Thing.

Scope --

DataType ControlledTerm

Examples --

# Property DefinitionRiC-P67Description DescriptionoftheConcept/Thing.

Scope --

DataType Text

Examples --

Page 47: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 39

4.Relations

4.1ListofRelationsbyDomainEntityEditor’sNotes:1.Thefollowingareknownlimitationstothepresentationoftherelationsinthisconsultationdraft,toberesolvedinfutureversionsofthisdocument.

a. Therelationsinthecurrentdraftareintendedtobesuggestiveandnotcompleteornormative.b. Eachrelationidentifiedislackingadefinitionandexamples.Asaresult,theremaybesomeambiguity

regardingthemeaningandintendeduse.c. SequentialorderingofRecordsorRecordSets,accordingtochronologyorsomeothercriteria,hasnot

yetbeenfullyaccommodated. 2.Thisdraftpresentstherelationsaccordingtodomainentity.FutureversionsofRiC-CMmayofferadifferentpresentationoftherelations. 3.AllentitiesinRiCareassociatedwithallotherentities.Forexample:‘RecordisassociatedwithRecordSet’.Further,the‘isassociatedwith’relationisthemostgeneralorabstracttypeofrelation,whileallotherrelationstatementsaremorespecificphrasingsorrepresentations.Forexample,‘hascopy’isaspecifictypeofassociationrelationbetweentwoRecords.4.Severalentitiessharea‘hassubject’/’issubjectof’relation.Thisistosaythatoneentitycomprisesthetopic,theme,orcontentmatteroftheotherentity.Forexample,‘RecordhassubjectAgent’indicatesthattheinformationalcontentoftheRecordis‘about’(depicts,describes,orconcerns)theAgent.Severalotherrelations(suchas‘ismemberof’,‘ispartof’,‘ispredecessorof’,‘isevidenceof’,‘resultedfrom’,‘isheldby’,‘wascreatedby’,and‘hadcreationdate’)andtheirinverserelationsmaybeconsideredsharedbytwoormoreentities.Forexample,thechronologicalrelation‘ispredecessorof’canbeusedforRecord,RecordComponent,RecordSet,Agent,Occupation,Position,Function,Activity,andMandate.Fornow,eachoccurrenceoftheserelationsisdistinct;however,thestatusoftheserelationswillbeclarifiedinafutureversionofRiC-CMandinRiC-Ontology,andsomewilllikelybemergedintooneuniquerelation. 5.Almostallrelationsareexpressedinpresenttense,whichpermitsdescribingeitherpermanenttraitsorcurrentsituations.However,describingarchivalcontextoftenrequiresquotingpastsituationsandnon-permanenttraits.Forexample,'J.F.KennedyoccupiespositionpresidentoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica'isnotcurrentlytrue;sothisrelationshouldbestatedusingthepasttense:'J.F.KennedyoccupiedpositionpresidentoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica'.Also,‘RecordisheldbyAgent’referstoaRecordinthecurrentcustodyofanarchives,while‘RecordwasheldbyAgent’meansthattheRecordwasheld,onlyatacertaintime,inthecustodyofanAgent.Therefore,thelistsbelowprovide,forsomerelationtypes,botharelationusingthepresenttenseandarelationusingthepasttense.TheP68Datepropertycanalsobeusedtoclarifywhenarelationwasactive.

Page 48: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 40

4.1.1RecordRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange

InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R1 Record hascopy Record iscopyof(RiC-R6)

RiC-R2 Record hasdraft Record isdraftof(RiC-R7)

RiC-R3 Record hasoriginal Record isoriginalof(RiC-R8)

RiC-R4 Record hassubject Record issubjectof(RiC-R10)

RiC-R5 Record isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R5) SeealsoRiC-R12

RiC-R6 Record iscopyof Record hascopy(RiC-R1)

RiC-R7 Record isdraftof Record hasdraft(RiC-R2)

RiC-R8 Record isoriginalof Record hasoriginal(RiC-R3)

RiC-R9 Record ispredecessorof Record issuccessorof(RiC-R11)

RiC-R10 Record issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R4)

RiC-R11 Record issuccessorof Record ispredecessorof(RiC-R9)

RiC-R12 Record wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R12)

SeealsoRiC-R5

RiC-R13 Record hadpart RecordComponent

waspartof(RiC-R77) SeealsoRiC-R14

RiC-R14 Record haspart RecordComponent

ispartof(RiC-R75) SeealsoRiC-R13

RiC-R15 Record isassociatedwith RecordComponent

isassociatedwith(RiC-R74) SeealsoRiC-R16

RiC-R16 Record wasassociatedwith RecordComponent

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R76)

SeealsoRiC-R15

RiC-R17 Record isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R136) SeealsoRiC-R19

RiC-R18 Record ismemberof RecordSet hasmember(RiC-R135) SeealsoRiC-R20

RiC-R19 Record wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R137)

SeealsoRiC-R17

Page 49: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 41

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange

InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R20 Record wasmemberof RecordSet hadmember(RiC-R134) SeealsoRiC-R18

RiC-R21 Record hadrightsheldby Agent wasrightsholderof(RiC-R217)

SeealsoRiC-R22

RiC-R22 Record hasrightsheldby Agent isrightsholderof(RiC-R209) SeealsoRiC-R21

RiC-R23 Record hassubject Agent issubjectof(RiC-R210)

RiC-R24 Record isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R207) SeealsoRiC-R28

RiC-R25 Record isheldby Agent isholderof(RiC-R208) SeealsoRiC-R32

RiC-R26 Record isownedby Agent owns(RiC-R212) SeealsoRiC-R33

RiC-R27 Record wasaddressedto Agent wasaddresseeof(RiC-R214)

RiC-R28 Record wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R215)

SeealsoRiC-R24

RiC-R29 Record wasauthoredby Agent authored(RiC-R204)

RiC-R30 Record wascollectedby Agent collected(RiC-R205)

RiC-R31 Record wascreatedby Agent created(RiC-R206)

RiC-R32 Record washeldby Agent washolderof(RiC-R216) SeealsoRiC-R25

RiC-R33 Record wasownedby Agent owned(RiC-R211) SeealsoRiC-R26

RiC-R34 Record wassentby Agent sent(RiC-R213)

RiC-R35 Record waswrittenby Agent wrote(RiC-R218)

RiC-R36 Record hassubject Occupation issubjectof(RiC-R336)

RiC-R37 Record isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R335) SeealsoRiC-R39

RiC-R38 Record resultedfrom Occupation resultedin(RiC-R337)

RiC-R39 Record wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R338)

SeealsoRiC-R37

RiC-R40 Record hassubject Position issubjectof(RiC-R376)

Page 50: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 42

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange

InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R41 Record isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R375) SeealsoRiC-R43

RiC-R42 Record resultedfrom Position resultedin(RiC-R377)

RiC-R43 Record wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R378)

SeealsoRiC-R41

RiC-R44 Record hassubject Function issubjectof(RiC-R426)

RiC-R45 Record isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R424) SeealsoRiC-R47

RiC-R46 Record isevidenceof Function isevidencedby(RiC-R425)

RiC-R47 Record wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R427)

SeealsoRiC-R45

RiC-R48 Record hassubject Function(Abstract)

issubjectof(RiC-R478)

RiC-R49 Record isassociatedwith Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith(RiC-R477) SeealsoRiC-R50

RiC-R50 Record wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R479)

SeealsoRiC-R49

RiC-R51 Record hassubject Activity issubjectof(RiC-R510)

RiC-R52 Record isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R509) SeealsoRiC-R54

RiC-R53 Record resultedfrom Activity resultedin(RiC-R511)

RiC-R54 Record wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R512)

SeealsoRiC-R52

RiC-R55 Record hassubject Mandate issubjectof(RiC-R563)

RiC-R56 Record isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R561) SeealsoRiC-R58

RiC-R57 Record isevidenceof Mandate isevidencedby(RiC-R562)

RiC-R58 Record wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R564)

SeealsoRiC-R56

RiC-R59 Record hasdocumentaryform DocumentaryForm

isdocumentaryformof(RiC-R615)

Page 51: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 43

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange

InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R60 Record isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm

isassociatedwith(RiC-R614) SeealsoRiC-R61

RiC-R61 Record wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R616)

SeealsoRiC-R60

RiC-R62 Record hadcreationdate Date wascreationdateof(RiC-R646)

RiC-R63 Record isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R644) SeealsoRiC-R64

RiC-R64 Record wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R645)

SeealsoRiC-R63

RiC-R65 Record hadholdinglocation Place washoldinglocationof(RiC-R712)

SeealsoRiC-R66

RiC-R66 Record hasholdinglocation Place isholdinglocationof(RiC-R708)

SeealsoRiC-R65

RiC-R67 Record hassubject Place issubjectof(RiC-R709)

RiC-R68 Record isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R707) SeealsoRiC-R69

RiC-R69 Record wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R710)

SeealsoRiC-R68

RiC-R70 Record wascreatedat Place wascreationlocationof(RiC-R711)

RiC-R71 Record hassubject Concept/Thing issubjectof(RiC-R763)

RiC-R72 Record isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R762) SeealsoRiC-R73

RiC-R73 Record wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R764)

SeealsoRiC-R72

Page 52: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 44

4.1.2.RecordComponentRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R74 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R15)

SeealsoRiC-R76

RiC-R75 RecordComponent ispartof Record haspart(RiC-R14) SeealsoRiC-R77

RiC-R76 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R16)

SeealsoRiC-R74

RiC-R77 RecordComponent waspartof Record hadpart(RiC-R13) SeealsoRiC-R75

RiC-R78 RecordComponent isassociatedwith RecordComponent

isassociatedwith(RiC-R78)

SeealsoRiC-R81

RiC-R79 RecordComponent ispredecessorof RecordComponent

issuccessorof(RiC-R80)

RiC-R80 RecordComponent issuccessorof RecordComponent

ispredecessorof(RiC-R79)

RiC-R81 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

RecordComponent

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R81)

SeealsoRiC-R78

RiC-R82 RecordComponent isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R138)

SeealsoRiC-R83

RiC-R83 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R139)

SeealsoRiC-R82

RiC-R84 RecordComponent hadrightsheldby Agent wasrightsholderof(RiC-R230)

SeealsoRiC-R85

RiC-R85 RecordComponent hasrightsheldby Agent isrightsholderof(RiC-R224)

SeealsoRiC-R84

RiC-R86 RecordComponent hassubject Agent issubjectof(RiC-R225)

RiC-R87 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R222)

SeealsoRiC-R90

RiC-R88 RecordComponent isheldby Agent isholderof(RiC-R223)

SeealsoRiC-R94

Page 53: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 45

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R89 RecordComponent isownerof Agent owns(RiC-R227) SeealsoRiC-R95

RiC-R90 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R228)

SeealsoRiC-R87

RiC-R91 RecordComponent wasauthoredby Agent authored(RiC-R219)

RiC-R92 RecordComponent wascollectedby Agent collected(RiC-R220)

RiC-R93 RecordComponent wascreatedby Agent created(RiC-R221)

RiC-R94 RecordComponent washeldby Agent washolderof(RiC-R229)

SeealsoRiC-R88

RiC-R95 RecordComponent wasownerof Agent owned(RiC-R226) SeealsoRiC-R89

RiC-R96 RecordComponent waswrittenby Agent wrote(RiC-R231)

RiC-R97 RecordComponent hassubject Occupation issubjectof(RiC-R340)

RiC-R98 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R339)

SeealsoRiC-R100

RiC-R99 RecordComponent resultedfrom Occupation resultedin(RiC-R341)

RiC-R100 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R342)

SeealsoRiC-R98

RiC-R101 RecordComponent hassubject Position issubjectof(RiC-R380)

RiC-R102 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R379)

SeealsoRiC-R104

RiC-R103 RecordComponent resultedfrom Position resultedin(RiC-R381)

RiC-R104 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R382)

SeealsoRiC-R102

RiC-R105 RecordComponent hassubject Function issubjectof(RiC-R430)

Page 54: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 46

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R106 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R428)

SeealsoRiC-R108

RiC-R107 RecordComponent isevidenceof Function isevidencedby(RiC-R429)

RiC-R108 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R431)

SeealsoRiC-R106

RiC-R109 RecordComponent hassubject Function(Abstract)

issubjectof(RiC-R481)

RiC-R110 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith(RiC-R480)

SeealsoRiC-R111

RiC-R111 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R482)

SeealsoRiC-R110

RiC-R112 RecordComponent hassubject Activity issubjectof(RiC-R514)

RiC-R113 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R513)

SeealsoRiC-R115

RiC-R114 RecordComponent resultedfrom Activity resultedin(RiC-R515)

RiC-R115 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R516)

SeealsoRiC-R113

RiC-R116 RecordComponent hassubject Mandate issubjectof(RiC-R566)

RiC-R117 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R565)

SeealsoRiC-R118

RiC-R118 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R567)

SeealsoRiC-R117

RiC-R119 RecordComponent hasdocumentaryform

DocumentaryForm

isdocumentaryformof(RiC-R618)

RiC-R120 RecordComponent isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm

isassociatedwith(RiC-R617)

SeealsoRiC-R121

Page 55: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 47

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R121 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

DocumentaryForm

wasassociatedwith(RiC-R619)

SeealsoRiC-R120

RiC-R122 RecordComponent hadcreationdate Date wascreationdateof(RiC-R649)

RiC-R123 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R647)

SeealsoRiC-R124

RiC-R124 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R648)

SeealsoRiC-R123

RiC-R125 RecordComponent hadholdinglocation

Place washoldinglocationof(RiC-R718)

SeealsoRiC-R126

RiC-R126 RecordComponent hasholdinglocation

Place isholdinglocationof(RiC-R714)

SeealsoRiC-R125

RiC-R127 RecordComponent hassubject Place issubjectof(RiC-R715)

RiC-R128 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R713)

SeealsoRiC-R129

RiC-R129 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R716)

SeealsoRiC-R128

RiC-R130 RecordComponent wascreatedat Place wascreationlocationof(RiC-R717)

RiC-R131 RecordComponent hassubject Concept/Thing issubjectof(RiC-R766)

RiC-R132 RecordComponent isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R765)

SeealsoRiC-R133

RiC-R133 RecordComponent wasassociatedwith

Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R767)

SeealsoRiC-R132

Page 56: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 48

4.1.3.RecordSetRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R134 RecordSet hadmember Record wasmemberof(RiC-R20)

SeealsoRiC-R135

RiC-R135 RecordSet hasmember Record ismemberof(RiC-R18) SeealsoRiC-R134

RiC-R136 RecordSet isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R17)

SeealsoRiC-R137

RiC-R137 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R19)

SeealsoRiC-R136

RiC-R138 RecordSet isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R82)

SeealsoRiC-R139

RiC-R139 RecordSet wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R83)

SeealsoRiC-R138

RiC-R140 RecordSet hadmember RecordSet wasmemberof(RiC-R147)

SeealsoRiC-R141

RiC-R141 RecordSet hasmember RecordSet ismemberof(RiC-R143)

SeealsoRiC-R140

RiC-R142 RecordSet isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R142)

SeealsoRiC-R146

RiC-R143 RecordSet ismemberof RecordSet hasmember(RiC-R141) SeealsoRiC-R147

RiC-R144 RecordSet ispredecessorof RecordSet issuccessorof(RiC-R145)

RiC-R145 RecordSet issuccessorof RecordSet ispredecessorof(RiC-R144)

RiC-R146 RecordSet wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R146)

SeealsoRiC-R142

RiC-R147 RecordSet wasmemberof RecordSet hadmember(RiC-R140)

SeealsoRiC-R143

RiC-R148

RecordSet hadrightsheldby Agent wasrightsholderof(RiC-R249)

SeealsoRiC-R149

Page 57: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 49

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R149 RecordSet hasrightsheldby Agent isrightsholderof(RiC-R239)

SeealsoRiC-R148

RiC-R150 RecordSet hassubject Agent issubjectof(RiC-R240)

RiC-R151 RecordSet isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R237)

SeealsoRiC-R159

RiC-R152 RecordSet isheldby Agent isholderof(RiC-R238) SeealsoRiC-R162

RiC-R153 RecordSet ismanagedby Agent manages(RiC-R242) SeealsoRiC-R163

RiC-R154 RecordSet isownedby Agent owns(RiC-R244) SeealsoRiC-R164

RiC-R155 RecordSet wasaccumulatedby Agent accumulated(RiC-R232)

RiC-R156 RecordSet wasaddressedto Agent wasaddresseeof(RiC-R246)

RiC-R157 RecordSet wasarrangedby Agent arranged(RiC-R233)

RiC-R158 RecordSet wasassembledby Agent assembled(RiC-R234)

RiC-R159 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R247)

SeealsoRiC-R151

RiC-R160 RecordSet wascollectedby Agent collected(RiC-R235)

RiC-R161 RecordSet wascreatedby Agent created(RiC-R236)

RiC-R162 RecordSet washeldby Agent washolderof(RiC-R248)

SeealsoRiC-R152

RiC-R163 RecordSet wasmanagedby Agent managed(RiC-R241) SeealsoRiC-R153

RiC-R164 RecordSet wasownedby Agent owned(RiC-R243) SeealsoRiC-R154

RiC-R165 RecordSet wassentby Agent sent(RiC-R245)

RiC-R166 RecordSet hassubject Occupation issubjectof(RiC-R344)

RiC-R167 RecordSet isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R343)

SeealsoRiC-R169

Page 58: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 50

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R168 RecordSet resultedfrom Occupation resultedin(RiC-R345)

RiC-R169 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R346)

SeealsoRiC-R167

RiC-R170 RecordSet hassubject Position issubjectof(RiC-R384)

RiC-R171 RecordSet isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R383)

SeealsoRiC-R173

RiC-R172 RecordSet resultedfrom Position resultedin(RiC-R385)

RiC-R173 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R386)

SeealsoRiC-R171

RiC-R174 RecordSet hassubject Function issubjectof(RiC-R434)

RiC-R175 RecordSet isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R432)

SeealsoRiC-R177

RiC-R176 RecordSet isevidenceof Function isevidencedby(RiC-R433)

RiC-R177 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R435)

SeealsoRiC-R175

RiC-R178 RecordSet hassubject Function(Abstract) issubjectof(RiC-R484)

RiC-R179 RecordSet isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R483)

SeealsoRiC-R180

RiC-R180 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R485)

SeealsoRiC-R179

RiC-R181 RecordSet hassubject Activity issubjectof(RiC-R518)

RiC-R182 RecordSet isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R517)

SeealsoRiC-R184

RiC-R183 RecordSet resultedfrom Activity resultedin(RiC-R519)

RiC-R184 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R520)

SeealsoRiC-R182

Page 59: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 51

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R185 RecordSet hassubject Mandate issubjectof(RiC-R570)

RiC-R186 RecordSet isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R568)

SeealsoRiC-R188

RiC-R187 RecordSet isevidenceof Mandate isevidencedby(RiC-R569)

RiC-R188 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R571)

SeealsoRiC-R186

RiC-R189 RecordSet isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R620)

SeealsoRiC-R190

RiC-R190 RecordSet wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R621)

SeealsoRiC-R189

RiC-R191 RecordSet hadcreationdate Date wascreationdateof(RiC-R653)

RiC-R192 RecordSet hascoveragedate Date iscoveragedateof(RiC-R651)

RiC-R193 RecordSet isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R650)

SeealsoRiC-R194

RiC-R194 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R652)

SeealsoRiC-R193

RiC-R195 RecordSet hadholdinglocation Place washoldingplaceof(RiC-R724)

SeealsoRiC-R196

RiC-R196 RecordSet hasholdinglocation Place isholdingplaceof(RiC-R720)

SeealsoRiC-R195

RiC-R197 RecordSet hassubject Place issubjectof(RiC-R721)

RiC-R198 RecordSet isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R719)

SeealsoRiC-R199

RiC-R199 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R722)

SeealsoRiC-R198

RiC-R200 RecordSet wascreatedat Place wascreationplaceof(RiC-R723)

Page 60: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 52

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R201 RecordSet hassubject Concept/Thing issubjectof(RiC-R769)

RiC-R202 RecordSet isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R768)

SeealsoRiC-R203

RiC-R203 RecordSet wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R770)

SeealsoRiC-R202

4.1.4.AgentRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R204 Agent authored Record wasauthoredby(RiC-R29)

RiC-R205 Agent collected Record wascollectedby(RiC-R30)

RiC-R206 Agent created Record wascreatedby(RiC-R31)

RiC-R207 Agent isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R24)

SeealsoRiC-R215

RiC-R208 Agent isholderof Record isheldby(RiC-R25) SeealsoRiC-R216

RiC-R209 Agent isrightsholderof Record hasrightsheldby(RiC-R22)

SeealsoRiC-R217

RiC-R210 Agent issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R23)

RiC-R211 Agent owned Record wasownedby(RiC-R33) SeealsoRiC-R212

RiC-R212 Agent owns Record isownedby(RiC-R26) SeealsoRiC-R211

RiC-R213 Agent sent Record wassentby(RiC-R34)

RiC-R214 Agent wasaddresseeof Record wasaddressedto(RiC-R27)

Page 61: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 53

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R215 Agent wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R28)

SeealsoRiC-R207

RiC-R216 Agent washolderof Record washeldby(RiC-R32) SeealsoRiC-R208

RiC-R217 Agent wasrightsholderof Record hadrightsheldby(RiC-R21)

SeealsoRiC-R209

RiC-R218 Agent wrote Record waswrittenby(RiC-R35)

RiC-R219 Agent authored RecordComponent wasauthoredby(RiC-R91)

RiC-R220 Agent collected RecordComponent wascollectedby(RiC-R92)

RiC-R221 Agent created RecordComponent wascreatedby(RiC-R93)

RiC-R222 Agent isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R87)

SeealsoRiC-R228

RiC-R223 Agent isholderof RecordComponent isheldby(RiC-R88) SeealsoRiC-R229

RiC-R224 Agent isrightsholderof RecordComponent hasrightsheldby(RiC-R85)

SeealsoRiC-R230

RiC-R225 Agent issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R86)

RiC-R226 Agent owned RecordComponent wasownerof(RiC-R95) SeealsoRiC-R227

RiC-R227 Agent owns RecordComponent isownerof(RiC-R89) SeealsoRiC-R226

RiC-R228 Agent wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R90)

SeealsoRiC-R222

RiC-R229 Agent washolderof RecordComponent washeldby(RiC-R94) SeealsoRiC-R223

RiC-R230 Agent wasrightsholderof RecordComponent hadrightsheldby(RiC-R84)

SeealsoRiC-R224

Page 62: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 54

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R231 Agent wrote RecordComponent waswrittenby(RiC-R96)

RiC-R232 Agent accumulated RecordSet wasaccumulatedby(RiC-R155)

RiC-R233 Agent arranged RecordSet wasarrangedby(RiC-R157)

RiC-R234 Agent assembled RecordSet wasassembledby(RiC-R158)

RiC-R235 Agent collected RecordSet wascollectedby(RiC-R160)

RiC-R236 Agent created RecordSet wascreatedby(RiC-R161)

RiC-R237 Agent isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R151)

SeealsoRiC-R247

RiC-R238 Agent isholderof RecordSet isheldby(RiC-R152) SeealsoRiC-R248

RiC-R239 Agent isrightsholderof RecordSet hasrightsheldby(RiC-R149)

SeealsoRiC-R249

RiC-R240 Agent issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R150)

RiC-R241 Agent managed RecordSet wasmanagedby(RiC-R163)

SeealsoRiC-R242

RiC-R242 Agent manages RecordSet ismanagedby(RiC-R153)

SeealsoRiC-R241

RiC-R243 Agent owned RecordSet wasownedby(RiC-R164)

SeealsoRiC-R244

RiC-R244 Agent owns RecordSet isownedby(RiC-R154) SeealsoRiC-R243

RiC-R245 Agent sent RecordSet wassentby(RiC-R165)

RiC-R246 Agent wasaddresseeof RecordSet wasaddressedto(RiC-R156)

Page 63: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 55

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R247 Agent wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R159)

SeealsoRiC-R237

RiC-R248 Agent washolderof RecordSet washeldby(RiC-R162) SeealsoRiC-R238

RiC-R249 Agent wasrightsholderof RecordSet hadrightsheldby(RiC-R148)

SeealsoRiC-R239

RiC-R250 Agent controlled Agent wascontrolledby(RiC-R280)

SeealsoRiC-R251

RiC-R251 Agent controls Agent iscontrolledby(RiC-R263)

SeealsoRiC-R250

RiC-R252 Agent created Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

wascreatedby(RiC-R281)

RiC-R253 Agent hadfunctionalrelationwith

Agent hadfunctionalrelationwith(RiC-R253)

SeealsoRiC-R257

RiC-R254 Agent(oftypegroup)

hadmember Agent wasmemberof(RiC-R284)

SeealsoRiC-R258

RiC-R255 Agent(oftypegroup)

hadpart Agent(oftypegroup) waspartof(RiC-R286) SeealsoRiC-R259

RiC-R256 Agent hasassumedidentity Agent isassumedidentityof(RiC-R261)

RiC-R257 Agent hasfunctionalrelationwith

Agent hasfunctionalrelationwith(RiC-R257)

SeealsoRiC-R253

RiC-R258 Agent(oftypegroup)

hasmember Agent ismemberof(RiC-R266) SeealsoRiC-R254

RiC-R259 Agent(oftypegroup)

haspart Agent(oftypegroup) ispartof(RiC-R268) SeealsoRiC-R255

RiC-R260 Agent isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R260)

SeealsoRiC-R278

RiC-R261 Agent isassumedidentityof

Agent hasassumedidentity(RiC-R256)

Page 64: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 56

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R262 Agent(oftypeperson)

ischildof Agent(oftypeperson)

isparentof(RiC-R267) SeealsoRiC-R279

RiC-R263 Agent iscontrolledby Agent controls(RiC-R251) SeealsoRiC-R280

RiC-R264 Agent(oftypecorporatebody)

isdirectedby Agent(oftypeperson)

isdirectorof(RiC-R265) SeealsoRiC-R282

RiC-R265 Agent(oftypeperson)

isdirectorof Agent(oftypecorporatebody)

isdirectedby(RiC-R264) SeealsoRiC-R283

RiC-R266 Agent ismemberof Agent(oftypegroup) hasmember(RiC-R258) SeealsoRiC-R284

RiC-R267 Agent(oftypeperson)

isparentof Agent(oftypeperson)

ischildof(RiC-R262) SeealsoRiC-R285

RiC-R268 Agent(oftypegroup)

ispartof Agent(oftypegroup) haspart(RiC-R259) SeealsoRiC-R286

RiC-R269 Agent ispredecessorof Agent issuccessorof(RiC-R273)

RiC-R270 Agent(oftypeperson)

issiblingof Agent(oftypeperson)

issiblingof(RiC-R270) SeealsoRiC-R287

RiC-R271 Agent(oftypeperson)

isspouseof Agent(oftypeperson)

isspouseof(RiC-R271) SeealsoRiC-R288

RiC-R272 Agent issubordinateof Agent issuperiorof(RiC-R274) SeealsoRiC-R289

RiC-R273 Agent issuccessorof Agent ispredecessorof(RiC-R269)

RiC-R274 Agent issuperiorof Agent issubordinateof(RiC-R272)

SeealsoRiC-R290

RiC-R275 Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

isusedby Agent uses(RiC-R277) SeealsoRiC-R291

Page 65: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 57

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R276 Agent used Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

wasusedby(RiC-R291) SeealsoRiC-R277

RiC-R277 Agent uses Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

isusedby(RiC-R275) SeealsoRiC-R276

RiC-R278 Agent wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R278)

SeealsoRiC-R260

RiC-R279 Agent(oftypeperson)

waschildof Agent(oftypeperson)

wasparentof(RiC-R285) SeealsoRiC-R262

RiC-R280 Agent wascontrolledby Agent controlled(RiC-R250) SeealsoRiC-R263

RiC-R281 Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

wascreatedby Agent created(RiC-R252)

RiC-R282 Agent(oftypecorporatebody)

wasdirectedby Agent(oftypeperson)

wasdirectorof(RiC-R283)

SeealsoRiC-R264

RiC-R283 Agent(oftypeperson)

wasdirectorof Agent(oftypecorporatebody)

wasdirectedby(RiC-R282)

SeealsoRiC-R265

RiC-R284 Agent wasmemberof Agent(oftypegroup) hadmember(RiC-R254) SeealsoRiC-R266

RiC-R285 Agent(oftypeperson)

wasparentof Agent(oftypeperson)

waschildof(RiC-R279) SeealsoRiC-R267

RiC-R286 Agent(oftypegroup)

waspartof Agent(oftypegroup) hadpart(RiC-R255) SeealsoRiC-R268

RiC-R287 Agent(oftypeperson)

wassiblingof Agent(oftypeperson)

wassiblingof(RiC-R287) SeealsoRiC-R270

RiC-R288 Agent(oftypeperson)

wasspouseof Agent(oftypeperson)

wasspouseof(RiC-R288)

SeealsoRiC-R271

Page 66: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 58

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R289 Agent wassubordinateof Agent wassuperiorof(RiC-R290)

SeealsoRiC-R272

RiC-R290 Agent wassuperiorof Agent wassubordinateof(RiC-R289)

SeealsoRiC-R274

RiC-R291 Agent(oftypedelegate-agent)

wasusedby Agent used(RiC-R276) SeealsoRiC-R275

RiC-R292 Agent isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R347)

SeealsoRiC-R295

RiC-R293 Agent pursued Occupation waspursuedby(RiC-R350)

SeealsoRiC-R294

RiC-R294 Agent pursues Occupation ispursuedby(RiC-R348) SeealsoRiC-R293

RiC-R295 Agent wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R349)

SeealsoRiC-R292

RiC-R296 Agent(oftypegroup)

established Position wasestablishedby(RiC-R390)

RiC-R297 Agent isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R387)

SeealsoRiC-R300

RiC-R298 Agent(oftypeperson)

occupied Position wasoccupiedby(RiC-R391)

SeealsoRiC-R299

RiC-R299 Agent(oftypeperson)

occupies Position isoccupiedby(RiC-R388)

SeealsoRiC-R298

RiC-R300 Agent wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R389)

SeealsoRiC-R297

RiC-R301 Agent fulfilled Function wasfulfilledby(RiC-R439)

SeealsoRiC-R302

RiC-R302 Agent fulfils Function isfulfilledby(RiC-R437) SeealsoRiC-R301

RiC-R303 Agent isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R436)

SeealsoRiC-R304

Page 67: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 59

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R304 Agent wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R438)

SeealsoRiC-R303

RiC-R305 Agent isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R486)

SeealsoRiC-R306

RiC-R306 Agent wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R487)

SeealsoRiC-R305

RiC-R307 Agent isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R521)

SeealsoRiC-R310

RiC-R308 Agent performed Activity wasperformedby(RiC-R524)

SeealsoRiC-R309

RiC-R309 Agent performs Activity isperformedby(RiC-R522)

SeealsoRiC-R308

RiC-R310 Agent wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R523)

SeealsoRiC-R307

RiC-R311 Agent isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R573)

SeealsoRiC-R312

RiC-R312 Agent wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R574)

SeealsoRiC-R311

RiC-R313 Agent wasauthorizedby Mandate authorized(RiC-R572)

RiC-R314 Agent isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R622)

SeealsoRiC-R315

RiC-R315 Agent wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R623)

SeealsoRiC-R314

RiC-R316 Agent hadactivedate Date wasactivedateof(RiC-R657)

SeealsoRiC-R321

RiC-R317 Agent(oftypeperson)

hadbirthdate Date wasbirthdateof(RiC-R659)

RiC-R318

Agent(oftypeperson)

haddeathdate Date wasdeathdateof(RiC-R660)

Page 68: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 60

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R319 Agent(oftypegroup)

hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R661)

SeealsoRiC-R322

RiC-R320 Agent(oftypegroup)

hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R662)

RiC-R321 Agent hasactivedate Date isactivedateof(RiC-R654)

SeealsoRiC-R316

RiC-R322 Agent(oftypegroup)

hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R656) SeealsoRiC-R319

RiC-R323 Agent isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R655)

SeealsoRiC-R324

RiC-R324 Agent wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R658)

SeealsoRiC-R323

RiC-R325 Agent(oftypeperson)

hadbirthplace Place wasbirthplaceof(RiC-R730)

RiC-R326 Agent(oftypeperson)

haddeathplace Place wasdeathplaceof(RiC-R731)

RiC-R327 Agent isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R727)

SeealsoRiC-R330

RiC-R328 Agent(oftypeperson)

iscitizenof Place hascitizen(RiC-R726) SeealsoRiC-R331

RiC-R329 Agent islocatedat Place islocationof(RiC-R728) SeealsoRiC-R332

RiC-R330 Agent wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R729)

SeealsoRiC-R327

RiC-R331 Agent(oftypeperson)

wascitizenof Place hadcitizen(RiC-R725) SeealsoRiC-R328

RiC-R332 Agent waslocatedat Place waslocationof(RiC-R732)

SeealsoRiC-R329

RiC-R333

Agent isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R771)

SeealsoRiC-R334

Page 69: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 61

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R334 Agent wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R772)

SeealsoRiC-R333

4.1.5.OccupationRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R335 Occupation isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R37)

SeealsoRiC-R338

RiC-R336 Occupation issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R36)

RiC-R337 Occupation resultedin Record resultedfrom(RiC-R38)

RiC-R338 Occupation wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R39)

SeealsoRiC-R335

RiC-R339 Occupation isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R98)

SeealsoRiC-R342

RiC-R340 Occupation issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R97)

RiC-R341 Occupation resultedin RecordComponent resultedfrom(RiC-R99)

RiC-R342 Occupation wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R100)

SeealsoRiC-R339

RiC-R343 Occupation isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R167)

SeealsoRiC-R346

RiC-R344 Occupation issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R166)

RiC-R345 Occupation resultedin RecordSet resultedfrom(RiC-R168)

RiC-R346 Occupation wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R169)

SeealsoRiC-R343

Page 70: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 62

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R347 Occupation isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R292)

SeealsoRiC-R349

RiC-R348 Occupation ispursuedby Agent pursues(RiC-R294) SeealsoRiC-R350

RiC-R349 Occupation wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R295)

SeealsoRiC-R347

RiC-R350 Occupation waspursuedby Agent pursued(RiC-R293) SeealsoRiC-R348

RiC-R351 Occupation isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R351)

SeealsoRiC-R354

RiC-R352 Occupation ispredecessorof Occupation issuccessorof(RiC-R353)

RiC-R353 Occupation issuccessorof Occupation ispredecessorof(RiC-R352)

RiC-R354 Occupation wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R354)

SeealsoRiC-R351

RiC-R355 Occupation isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R392)

SeealsoRiC-R357

RiC-R356 Occupation isrequiredcompetencyof

Position requirescompetency(RiC-R394)

SeealsoRiC-R358

RiC-R357 Occupation wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R395)

SeealsoRiC-R355

RiC-R358 Occupation wasrequiredcompetencyof

Position requiredcompetency(RiC-R393)

SeealsoRiC-R356

RiC-R359 Occupation isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R440)

SeealsoRiC-R360

RiC-R360 Occupation wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R441)

SeealsoRiC-R359

RiC-R361 Occupation isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R488)

SeealsoRiC-R362

Page 71: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 63

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R362 Occupation wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R489)

SeealsoRiC-R361

RiC-R363 Occupation isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R525)

SeealsoRiC-R364

RiC-R364 Occupation wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R526)

SeealsoRiC-R363

RiC-R365 Occupation isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R575)

SeealsoRiC-R366

RiC-R366 Occupation wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R576)

SeealsoRiC-R365

RiC-R367 Occupation isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R624)

SeealsoRiC-R368

RiC-R368 Occupation wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R625)

SeealsoRiC-R367

RiC-R369 Occupation isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R663)

SeealsoRiC-R370

RiC-R370 Occupation wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R664)

SeealsoRiC-R369

RiC-R371 Occupation isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R733)

SeealsoRiC-R372

RiC-R372 Occupation wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R734)

SeealsoRiC-R371

RiC-R373 Occupation isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R773)

SeealsoRiC-R374

RiC-R374 Occupation wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R774)

SeealsoRiC-R373

Page 72: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 64

4.1.6.PositionRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R375 Position isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R41) SeealsoRiC-R378

RiC-R376 Position issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R40)

RiC-R377 Position resultedin Record resultedfrom(RiC-R42)

RiC-R378 Position wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R43)

SeealsoRiC-R375

RiC-R379 Position isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R102)

SeealsoRiC-R382

RiC-R380 Position issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R101)

RiC-R381 Position resultedin RecordComponent resultedfrom(RiC-R103)

RiC-R382 Position wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R104)

SeealsoRiC-R379

RiC-R383 Position isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R171)

SeealsoRiC-R386

RiC-R384 Position issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R170)

RiC-R385 Position resultedin RecordSet resultedfrom(RiC-R172)

RiC-R386 Position wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R173)

SeealsoRiC-R383

RiC-R387 Position isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R297)

SeealsoRiC-R389

RiC-R388

Position isoccupiedby Agent(oftypeperson)

occupies(RiC-R299) SeealsoRiC-R391

RiC-R389 Position wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R300)

SeealsoRiC-R387

RiC-R390 Position wasestablishedby Agent(oftypegroup)

established(RiC-R296)

Page 73: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 65

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R391 Position wasoccupiedby Agent(oftypeperson)

occupied(RiC-R298) SeealsoRiC-R388

RiC-R392 Position isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R355)

SeealsoRiC-R395

RiC-R393 Position requiredcompetency

Occupation wasrequiredcompetencyof(RiC-R358)

SeealsoRiC-R394

RiC-R394 Position requirescompetency

Occupation isrequiredcompetencyof(RiC-R356)

SeealsoRiC-R393

RiC-R395 Position wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R357)

SeealsoRiC-R392

RiC-R396 Position isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R396)

SeealsoRiC-R399

RiC-R397 Position ispredecessorof Position issuccessorof(RiC-R398)

RiC-R398 Position issuccessorof Position ispredecessorof(RiC-R397)

RiC-R399 Position wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R399)

SeealsoRiC-R396

RiC-R400 Position isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R442)

SeealsoRiC-R401

RiC-R401 Position wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R443)

SeealsoRiC-R400

RiC-R402 Position isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R490)

SeealsoRiC-R403

RiC-R403 Position wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R491)

SeealsoRiC-R402

RiC-R404 Position isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R527)

SeealsoRiC-R405

RiC-R405

Position wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R528)

SeealsoRiC-R404

Page 74: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 66

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R406 Position isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R579)

SeealsoRiC-R408

RiC-R407 Position isdefinedby Mandate defines(RiC-R578) SeealsoRiC-R409

RiC-R408 Position wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R581)

SeealsoRiC-R406

RiC-R409 Position wasdefinedby Mandate defined(RiC-R577) SeealsoRiC-R407

RiC-R410 Position wasrevisedby Mandate revised(RiC-R580)

RiC-R411 Position isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R626)

SeealsoRiC-R412

RiC-R412 Position wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R627)

SeealsoRiC-R411

RiC-R413 Position hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R668) SeealsoRiC-R415

RiC-R414 Position hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R669)

RiC-R415 Position hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R666) SeealsoRiC-R413

RiC-R416 Position isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R665)

SeealsoRiC-R417

RiC-R417 Position wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R667)

SeealsoRiC-R416

RiC-R418 Position isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R735)

SeealsoRiC-R420

RiC-R419 Position islocatedin Place islocationof(RiC-R736) SeealsoRiC-R421

RiC-R420 Position wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R737)

SeealsoRiC-R418

RiC-R421 Position waslocatedin Place waslocationof(RiC-R738) SeealsoRiC-R419

RiC-R422 Position isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R775)

SeealsoRiC-R423

RiC-R423 Position wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R776)

SeealsoRiC-R422

Page 75: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 67

4.1.7.FunctionRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R424 Function isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R45)

SeealsoRiC-R427

RiC-R425 Function isevidencedby Record isevidenceof(RiC-R46)

RiC-R426 Function issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R44)

RiC-R427 Function wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R47)

SeealsoRiC-R424

RiC-R428 Function isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R106)

SeealsoRiC-R431

RiC-R429 Function isevidencedby RecordComponent isevidenceof(RiC-R107)

RiC-R430 Function issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R105)

RiC-R431 Function wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R108)

SeealsoRiC-R428

RiC-R432 Function isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R175)

SeealsoRiC-R435

RiC-R433 Function isevidencedby RecordSet isevidenceof(RiC-R176)

RiC-R434 Function issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R174)

RiC-R435 Function wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R177)

SeealsoRiC-R432

RiC-R436 Function isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R303)

SeealsoRiC-R438

RiC-R437 Function isfulfilledby Agent fulfils(RiC-R302) SeealsoRiC-R439

RiC-R438 Function wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R304)

SeealsoRiC-R436

RiC-R439 Function wasfulfilledby Agent fulfilled(RiC-R301) SeealsoRiC-R437

RiC-R440 Function isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R359)

SeealsoRiC-R441

Page 76: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 68

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R441 Function wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R360)

SeealsoRiC-R440

RiC-R442 Function isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R400)

SeealsoRiC-R443

RiC-R443 Function wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R401)

SeealsoRiC-R442

RiC-R444 Function hadpart Function waspartof(RiC-R451) SeealsoRiC-R445

RiC-R445 Function haspart Function ispartof(RiC-R447) SeealsoRiC-R444

RiC-R446 Function isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R446)

SeealsoRiC-R450

RiC-R447 Function ispartof Function haspart(RiC-R445) SeealsoRiC-R451

RiC-R448 Function ispredecessorof Function issuccessorof(RiC-R449)

RiC-R449 Function issuccessorof Function ispredecessorof(RiC-R448)

RiC-R450 Function wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R450)

SeealsoRiC-R446

RiC-R451 Function waspartof Function hadpart(RiC-R444) SeealsoRiC-R447

RiC-R452 Function isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R493)

SeealsoRiC-R454

RiC-R453 Function isexampleof Function(Abstract) hasexample(RiC-R492)

RiC-R454 Function wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R494)

SeealsoRiC-R452

RiC-R455 Function isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R529)

SeealsoRiC-R457

RiC-R456 Function isfulfilledbyperformanceof

Activity isperformedtofulfil(RiC-R530)

SeealsoRiC-R458

RiC-R457 Function wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R531)

SeealsoRiC-R455

Page 77: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 69

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R458 Function wasfulfilledbyperformanceof

Activity wasperformedtofulfill(RiC-R532)

SeealsoRiC-R456

RiC-R459 Function isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R584)

SeealsoRiC-R461

RiC-R460 Function isdefinedby Mandate defines(RiC-R583) SeealsoRiC-R462

RiC-R461 Function wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R586)

SeealsoRiC-R459

RiC-R462 Function wasdefinedby Mandate defined(RiC-R582) SeealsoRiC-R460

RiC-R463 Function wasrevisedby Mandate revised(RiC-R585)

RiC-R464 Function isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R628)

SeealsoRiC-R465

RiC-R465 Function wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R629)

SeealsoRiC-R464

RiC-R466 Function hadactivedate Date wasactivedateof(RiC-R673)

SeealsoRiC-R469

RiC-R467 Function hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R675)

SeealsoRiC-R470

RiC-R468 Function hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R676)

RiC-R469 Function hasactivedate Date isactivedateof(RiC-R670)

SeealsoRiC-R466

RiC-R470 Function hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R672) SeealsoRiC-R467

RiC-R471 Function isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R671)

SeealsoRiC-R472

RiC-R472 Function wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R674)

SeealsoRiC-R471

RiC-R473 Function isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R739)

SeealsoRiC-R474

Page 78: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 70

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R474 Function wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R740)

SeealsoRiC-R473

RiC-R475 Function isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R777)

SeealsoRiC-R476

RiC-R476 Function wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R778)

SeealsoRiC-R475

4.1.8.Function(Abstract)Relations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R477 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R49)

SeealsoRiC-R479

RiC-R478 Function(Abstract)

issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R48)

RiC-R479 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R50)

SeealsoRiC-R477

RiC-R480 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R110)

SeealsoRiC-R482

RiC-R481 Function(Abstract)

issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R109)

RiC-R482 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R111)

SeealsoRiC-R480

RiC-R483 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R179)

SeealsoRiC-R485

RiC-R484 Function(Abstract)

issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R178)

RiC-R485 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R180)

SeealsoRiC-R483

Page 79: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 71

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R486 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R305)

SeealsoRiC-R487

RiC-R487 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R306)

SeealsoRiC-R486

RiC-R488 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R361)

SeealsoRiC-R489

RiC-R489 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R362)

SeealsoRiC-R488

RiC-R490 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R402)

SeealsoRiC-R491

RiC-R491 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R403)

SeealsoRiC-R490

RiC-R492 Function(Abstract)

hasexample Function isexampleof(RiC-R453)

RiC-R493 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R452)

SeealsoRiC-R494

RiC-R494 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R454)

SeealsoRiC-R493

RiC-R495 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R495)

SeealsoRiC-R496

RiC-R496 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R496)

SeealsoRiC-R495

RiC-R497 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R533)

SeealsoRiC-R498

RiC-R498 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R534)

SeealsoRiC-R497

RiC-R499 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R587)

SeealsoRiC-R500

RiC-R500 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R588)

SeealsoRiC-R499

Page 80: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 72

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R501 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R630)

SeealsoRiC-R502

RiC-R502 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R631)

SeealsoRiC-R501

RiC-R503 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R677)

SeealsoRiC-R504

RiC-R504 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R678)

SeealsoRiC-R503

RiC-R505 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R741)

SeealsoRiC-R506

RiC-R506 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R742)

SeealsoRiC-R505

RiC-R507 Function(Abstract)

isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R779)

SeealsoRiC-R508

RiC-R508 Function(Abstract)

wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R780)

SeealsoRiC-R507

4.1.9.ActivityRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R509 Activity isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R52)

SeealsoRiC-R512

RiC-R510 Activity issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R51)

RiC-R511 Activity resultedin Record resultedfrom(RiC-R53)

RiC-R512 Activity wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R54)

SeealsoRiC-R509

RiC-R513 Activity isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R113)

SeealsoRiC-R516

RiC-R514 Activity issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R112)

Page 81: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 73

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R515 Activity resultedin RecordComponent resultedfrom(RiC-R114)

RiC-R516 Activity wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R115)

SeealsoRiC-R513

RiC-R517 Activity isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R182)

SeealsoRiC-R520

RiC-R518 Activity issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R181)

RiC-R519 Activity resultedin RecordSet resultedfrom(RiC-R183)

RiC-R520 Activity wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R184)

SeealsoRiC-R517

RiC-R521 Activity isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R307)

SeealsoRiC-R523

RiC-R522 Activity isperformedby Agent performs(RiC-R309) SeealsoRiC-R524

RiC-R523 Activity wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R310)

SeealsoRiC-R521

RiC-R524 Activity wasperformedby Agent performed(RiC-R308) SeealsoRiC-R522

RiC-R525 Activity isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R363)

SeealsoRiC-R526

RiC-R526 Activity wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R364)

SeealsoRiC-R525

RiC-R527 Activity isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R404)

SeealsoRiC-R528

RiC-R528 Activity wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R405)

SeealsoRiC-R527

RiC-R529 Activity isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R455)

SeealsoRiC-R531

RiC-R530 Activity isperformedtofulfil Function isfulfilledbyperformanceof(RiC-R456)

SeealsoRiC-R532

Page 82: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 74

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R531 Activity wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R457)

SeealsoRiC-R529

RiC-R532 Activity wasperformedtofulfill Function wasfulfilledbyperformanceof(RiC-R458)

SeealsoRiC-R530

RiC-R533 Activity isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R497)

SeealsoRiC-R534

RiC-R534 Activity wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R498)

SeealsoRiC-R533

RiC-R535 Activity hadpart Activity waspartof(RiC-R542) SeealsoRiC-R536

RiC-R536 Activity haspart Activity ispartof(RiC-R538) SeealsoRiC-R535

RiC-R537 Activity isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R537)

SeealsoRiC-R541

RiC-R538 Activity ispartof Activity haspart(RiC-R536) SeealsoRiC-R542

RiC-R539

Activity ispredecessorof Activity issuccessorof(RiC-R540)

RiC-R540 Activity issuccessorof Activity ispredecessorof(RiC-R539)

RiC-R541 Activity wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R541)

SeealsoRiC-R537

RiC-R542 Activity waspartof Activity hadpart(RiC-R535) SeealsoRiC-R538

RiC-R543 Activity isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R591)

SeealsoRiC-R545

RiC-R544 Activity isdefinedby Mandate defines(RiC-R590) SeealsoRiC-R546

RiC-R545 Activity wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R593)

SeealsoRiC-R543

RiC-R546 Activity wasdefinedby Mandate defined(RiC-R589) SeealsoRiC-R544

RiC-R547 Activity wasrevisedby Mandate revised(RiC-R592)

Page 83: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 75

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R548 Activity isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R632)

SeealsoRiC-R549

RiC-R549 Activity wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R633)

SeealsoRiC-R548

RiC-R550 Activity hadactivedate Date wasactivedateof(RiC-R682)

SeealsoRiC-R553

RiC-R551 Activity hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R684)

SeealsoRiC-R554

RiC-R552 Activity hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R685)

RiC-R553 Activity hasactivedate Date isactivedateof(RiC-R679)

SeealsoRiC-R550

RiC-R554 Activity hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R681) SeealsoRiC-R551

RiC-R555 Activity isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R680)

SeealsoRiC-R556

RiC-R556 Activity wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R683)

SeealsoRiC-R555

RiC-R557

Activity isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R743)

SeealsoRiC-R558

RiC-R558 Activity wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R744)

SeealsoRiC-R557

RiC-R559 Activity isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R781)

SeealsoRiC-R560

RiC-R560 Activity wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R782)

SeealsoRiC-R559

Page 84: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 76

4.1.10.MandateRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R561 Mandate isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R56) SeealsoRiC-R564

RiC-R562 Mandate isevidencedby Record isevidenceof(RiC-R57)

RiC-R563 Mandate issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R55)

RiC-R564 Mandate wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R58)

SeealsoRiC-R561

RiC-R565 Mandate isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R117) SeealsoRiC-R567

RiC-R566 Mandate issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R116)

RiC-R567 Mandate wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R118)

SeealsoRiC-R565

RiC-R568 Mandate isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R186) SeealsoRiC-R571

RiC-R569 Mandate isevidencedby RecordSet isevidenceof(RiC-R187)

RiC-R570 Mandate issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R185)

RiC-R571 Mandate wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R188)

SeealsoRiC-R568

RiC-R572 Mandate authorized Agent wasauthorizedby(RiC-R313)

RiC-R573 Mandate isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R311) SeealsoRiC-R574

RiC-R574 Mandate wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R312)

SeealsoRiC-R573

RiC-R575 Mandate isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R365) SeealsoRiC-R576

RiC-R576 Mandate wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R366)

SeealsoRiC-R575

RiC-R577 Mandate defined Position wasdefinedby(RiC-R409) SeealsoRiC-R578

RiC-R578 Mandate defines Position isdefinedby(RiC-R407) SeealsoRiC-R577

RiC-R579 Mandate isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R406) SeealsoRiC-R581

Page 85: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 77

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R580 Mandate revised Position wasrevisedby(RiC-R410)

RiC-R581 Mandate wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R408)

SeealsoRiC-R579

RiC-R582 Mandate defined Function wasdefinedby(RiC-R462) SeealsoRiC-R583

RiC-R583 Mandate defines Function isdefinedby(RiC-R460) SeealsoRiC-R582

RiC-R584 Mandate isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R459) SeealsoRiC-R586

RiC-R585 Mandate revised Function wasrevisedby(RiC-R463)

RiC-R586 Mandate wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R461)

SeealsoRiC-R584

RiC-R587 Mandate isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R499) SeealsoRiC-R588

RiC-R588 Mandate wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R500)

SeealsoRiC-R587

RiC-R589 Mandate defined Activity wasdefinedby(RiC-R546) SeealsoRiC-R590

RiC-R590 Mandate defines Activity isdefinedby(RiC-R544) SeealsoRiC-R589

RiC-R591 Mandate isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R543) SeealsoRiC-R593

RiC-R592 Mandate revised Activity wasrevisedby(RiC-R547)

RiC-R593 Mandate wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R545)

SeealsoRiC-R591

RiC-R594 Mandate isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R594) SeealsoRiC-R597

RiC-R595 Mandate ispredecessorof Mandate issuccessorof(RiC-R596)

RiC-R596 Mandate issuccessorof Mandate ispredecessorof(RiC-R595)

RiC-R597 Mandate wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R597)

SeealsoRiC-R594

RiC-R598 Mandate isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R634) SeealsoRiC-R599

RiC-R599 Mandate wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R635)

SeealsoRiC-R598

Page 86: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 78

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R600 Mandate hadactivedate Date wasactivedateof(RiC-R689)

SeealsoRiC-R604

RiC-R601 Mandate hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R691) SeealsoRiC-R605

RiC-R602 Mandate hadrevisiondate Date wasrevisiondateof(RiC-R692)

RiC-R603 Mandate hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R693)

RiC-R604 Mandate hasactivedate Date isactivedateof(RiC-R686) SeealsoRiC-R600

RiC-R605 Mandate hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R688) SeealsoRiC-R601

RiC-R606 Mandate isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R687) SeealsoRiC-R607

RiC-R607 Mandate wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R690)

SeealsoRiC-R606

RiC-R608 Mandate hadjurisdiction Place wasjurisdictionof(RiC-R748)

SeealsoRiC-R609

RiC-R609 Mandate hasjurisdiction Place isjurisdictionof(RiC-R746) SeealsoRiC-R608

RiC-R610 Mandate isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R745) SeealsoRiC-R611

RiC-R611 Mandate wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R747)

SeealsoRiC-R610

RiC-R612 Mandate isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R783) SeealsoRiC-R613

RiC-R613 Mandate wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R784)

SeealsoRiC-R612

4.1.11.DocumentaryFormRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R614 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R60)

SeealsoRiC-R616

Page 87: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 79

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R615 DocumentaryForm isdocumentaryformof

Record hasdocumentaryform(RiC-R59)

RiC-R616 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R61)

SeealsoRiC-R614

RiC-R617 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R120)

SeealsoRiC-R619

RiC-R618 DocumentaryForm isdocumentaryformof

RecordComponent hasdocumentaryform(RiC-R119)

RiC-R619 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R121)

SeealsoRiC-R617

RiC-R620 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R189)

SeealsoRiC-R621

RiC-R621 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R190)

SeealsoRiC-R620

RiC-R622 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R314)

SeealsoRiC-R623

RiC-R623 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R315)

SeealsoRiC-R622

RiC-R624 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R367)

SeealsoRiC-R625

RiC-R625 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R368)

SeealsoRiC-R624

RiC-R626 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R411)

SeealsoRiC-R627

RiC-R627 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R412)

SeealsoRiC-R626

RiC-R628 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R464)

SeealsoRiC-R629

RiC-R629 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R465)

SeealsoRiC-R628

Page 88: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 80

RelationNumber

RelationDomain RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R630 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R501)

SeealsoRiC-R631

RiC-R631 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R502)

SeealsoRiC-R630

RiC-R632 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R548)

SeealsoRiC-R633

RiC-R633 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R549)

SeealsoRiC-R632

RiC-R634 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R598)

SeealsoRiC-R635

RiC-R635 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R599)

SeealsoRiC-R634

RiC-R636 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R636)

SeealsoRiC-R637

RiC-R637 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R637)

SeealsoRiC-R636

RiC-R638 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R694)

SeealsoRiC-R639

RiC-R639 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R695)

SeealsoRiC-R638

RiC-R640 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R749)

SeealsoRiC-R641

RiC-R641 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R750)

SeealsoRiC-R640

RiC-R642 DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R785)

SeealsoRiC-R643

RiC-R643 DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R786)

SeealsoRiC-R642

Page 89: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 81

4.1.12.DateRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R644 Date isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R63)

SeealsoRiC-R645

RiC-R645 Date wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R64)

SeealsoRiC-R644

RiC-R646 Date wascreationdateof Record hadcreationdate(RiC-R62)

RiC-R647 Date isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R123)

SeealsoRiC-R648

RiC-R648 Date wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R124)

SeealsoRiC-R647

RiC-R649 Date wascreationdateof RecordComponent hadcreationdate(RiC-R122)

RiC-R650 Date isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R193)

SeealsoRiC-R652

RiC-R651 Date iscoveragedateof RecordSet hascoveragedate(RiC-R192)

RiC-R652 Date wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R194)

SeealsoRiC-R650

RiC-R653 Date wascreationdateof RecordSet hadcreationdate(RiC-R191)

RiC-R654 Date isactivedateof Agent hasactivedate(RiC-R321) SeealsoRiC-R657

RiC-R655 Date isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R323)

SeealsoRiC-R658

RiC-R656 Date isenddateof Agent(oftypegroup) hasenddate(RiC-R322) SeealsoRiC-R661

RiC-R657

Date wasactivedateof Agent hadactivedate(RiC-R316)

SeealsoRiC-R654

Page 90: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 82

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R658 Date wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R324)

SeealsoRiC-R655

RiC-R659 Date wasbirthdateof Agent(oftypeperson) hadbirthdate(RiC-R317)

RiC-R660 Date wasdeathdateof Agent(oftypeperson) haddeathdate(RiC-R318)

RiC-R661 Date wasenddateof Agent(oftypegroup) hadenddate(RiC-R319) SeealsoRiC-R656

RiC-R662 Date wasstartdateof Agent(oftypegroup) hadstartdate(RiC-R320)

RiC-R663 Date isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R369)

SeealsoRiC-R664

RiC-R664 Date wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R370)

SeealsoRiC-R663

RiC-R665 Date isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R416)

SeealsoRiC-R667

RiC-R666 Date isenddateof Position hasenddate(RiC-R415) SeealsoRiC-R668

RiC-R667 Date wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R417)

SeealsoRiC-R665

RiC-R668 Date wasenddateof Position hadenddate(RiC-R413) SeealsoRiC-R666

RiC-R669 Date wasstartdateof Position hadstartdate(RiC-R414)

RiC-R670 Date isactivedateof Function hasactivedate(RiC-R469) SeealsoRiC-R673

RiC-R671 Date isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R471)

SeealsoRiC-R674

RiC-R672 Date isenddateof Function hasenddate(RiC-R470) SeealsoRiC-R675

RiC-R673 Date wasactivedateof Function hadactivedate(RiC-R466)

SeealsoRiC-R670

RiC-R674 Date wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R472)

SeealsoRiC-R671

RiC-R675 Date wasenddateof Function hadenddate(RiC-R467) SeealsoRiC-R672

RiC-R676 Date wasstartdateof Function hadstartdate(RiC-R468)

Page 91: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 83

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R677 Date isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R503)

SeealsoRiC-R678

RiC-R678 Date wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R504)

SeealsoRiC-R677

RiC-R679 Date isactivedateof Activity hasactivedate(RiC-R553) SeealsoRiC-R682

RiC-R680 Date isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R555)

SeealsoRiC-R683

RiC-R681 Date isenddateof Activity hasenddate(RiC-R554) SeealsoRiC-R684

RiC-R682 Date wasactivedateof Activity hadactivedate(RiC-R550)

SeealsoRiC-R679

RiC-R683 Date wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R556)

SeealsoRiC-R680

RiC-R684 Date wasenddateof Activity hadenddate(RiC-R551) SeealsoRiC-R681

RiC-R685 Date wasstartdateof Activity hadstartdate(RiC-R552)

RiC-R686 Date isactivedateof Mandate hasactivedate(RiC-R604) SeealsoRiC-R689

RiC-R687 Date isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R606)

SeealsoRiC-R690

RiC-R688 Date isenddateof Mandate hasenddate(RiC-R605) SeealsoRiC-R691

RiC-R689 Date wasactivedateof Mandate hadactivedate(RiC-R600)

SeealsoRiC-R686

RiC-R690 Date wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R607)

SeealsoRiC-R687

RiC-R691 Date wasenddateof Mandate hadenddate(RiC-R601) SeealsoRiC-R688

RiC-R692 Date wasrevisiondateof Mandate hadrevisiondate(RiC-R602)

RiC-R693 Date wasstartdateof Mandate hadstartdate(RiC-R603)

RiC-R694 Date isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R638)

SeealsoRiC-R695

Page 92: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 84

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R695 Date wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R639)

SeealsoRiC-R694

RiC-R696 Date isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R696)

SeealsoRiC-R697

RiC-R697 Date wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R697)

SeealsoRiC-R696

RiC-R698 Date isactivedateof Place hasactivedate(RiC-R754) SeealsoRiC-R701

RiC-R699 Date isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R756)

SeealsoRiC-R702

RiC-R700 Date isenddateof Place hasenddate(RiC-R755) SeealsoRiC-R703

RiC-R701 Date wasactivedateof Place hadactivedate(RiC-R751)

SeealsoRiC-R698

RiC-R702 Date wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R757)

SeealsoRiC-R699

RiC-R703 Date wasenddateof Place hadenddate(RiC-R752) SeealsoRiC-R700

RiC-R704 Date wasstartdateof Place hadstartdate(RiC-R753)

RiC-R705 Date isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R787)

SeealsoRiC-R706

RiC-R706 Date wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R788)

SeealsoRiC-R705

4.2.13.PlaceRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R707 Place isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R68)

SeealsoRiC-R710

RiC-R708 Place isholdinglocationof Record hasholdinglocation(RiC-R66)

SeealsoRiC-R712

Page 93: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 85

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R709 Place issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R67)

RiC-R710 Place wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R69)

SeealsoRiC-R707

RiC-R711 Place wascreationlocationof Record wascreatedat(RiC-R70)

RiC-R712 Place washoldinglocationof Record hadholdinglocation(RiC-R65)

SeealsoRiC-R708

RiC-R713 Place isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R128)

SeealsoRiC-R716

RiC-R714 Place isholdinglocationof RecordComponent hasholdinglocation(RiC-R126)

SeealsoRiC-R718

RiC-R715 Place issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R127)

RiC-R716 Place wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R129)

SeealsoRiC-R713

RiC-R717 Place wascreationlocationof RecordComponent wascreatedat(RiC-R130)

RiC-R718 Place washoldinglocationof RecordComponent hadholdinglocation(RiC-R125)

SeealsoRiC-R714

RiC-R719 Place isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R198)

SeealsoRiC-R722

RiC-R720 Place isholdingplaceof RecordSet hasholdinglocation(RiC-R196)

SeealsoRiC-R724

RiC-R721 Place issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R197)

RiC-R722 Place wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R199)

SeealsoRiC-R719

RiC-R723

Place wascreationplaceof RecordSet wascreatedat(RiC-R200)

Page 94: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 86

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R724 Place washoldingplaceof RecordSet hadholdinglocation(RiC-R195)

SeealsoRiC-R720

RiC-R725 Place hadcitizen Agent(oftypeperson) wascitizenof(RiC-R331)

SeealsoRiC-R726

RiC-R726 Place hascitizen Agent(oftypeperson) iscitizenof(RiC-R328)

SeealsoRiC-R725

RiC-R727 Place isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R327)

SeealsoRiC-R729

RiC-R728 Place islocationof Agent islocatedat(RiC-R329)

SeealsoRiC-R732

RiC-R729 Place wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R330)

SeealsoRiC-R727

RiC-R730 Place wasbirthplaceof Agent(oftypeperson) hadbirthplace(RiC-R325)

RiC-R731 Place wasdeathplaceof Agent(oftypeperson) haddeathplace(RiC-R326)

RiC-R732 Place waslocationof Agent waslocatedat(RiC-R332)

SeealsoRiC-R728

RiC-R733 Place isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R371)

SeealsoRiC-R734

RiC-R734 Place wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R372)

SeealsoRiC-R733

RiC-R735 Place isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R418)

SeealsoRiC-R737

RiC-R736 Place islocationof Position islocatedin(RiC-R419)

SeealsoRiC-R738

RiC-R737 Place wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R420)

SeealsoRiC-R735

RiC-R738 Place waslocationof Position waslocatedin(RiC-R421)

SeealsoRiC-R736

Page 95: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 87

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R739 Place isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R473)

SeealsoRiC-R740

RiC-R740 Place wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R474)

SeealsoRiC-R739

RiC-R741 Place isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R505)

SeealsoRiC-R742

RiC-R742 Place wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R506)

SeealsoRiC-R741

RiC-R743 Place isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R557)

SeealsoRiC-R744

RiC-R744 Place wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R558)

SeealsoRiC-R743

RiC-R745 Place isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R610)

SeealsoRiC-R747

RiC-R746 Place isjurisdictionof Mandate hasjurisdiction(RiC-R609)

SeealsoRiC-R748

RiC-R747 Place wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R611)

SeealsoRiC-R745

RiC-R748 Place wasjurisdictionof Mandate hadjurisdiction(RiC-R608)

SeealsoRiC-R746

RiC-R749 Place isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R640)

SeealsoRiC-R750

RiC-R750 Place wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R641)

SeealsoRiC-R749

RiC-R751 Place hadactivedate Date wasactivedateof(RiC-R701)

SeealsoRiC-R754

RiC-R752 Place hadenddate Date wasenddateof(RiC-R703)

SeealsoRiC-R755

RiC-R753 Place hadstartdate Date wasstartdateof(RiC-R704)

Page 96: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 88

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R754 Place hasactivedate Date isactivedateof(RiC-R698)

SeealsoRiC-R751

RiC-R755 Place hasenddate Date isenddateof(RiC-R700)

SeealsoRiC-R752

RiC-R756 Place isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R699)

SeealsoRiC-R757

RiC-R757 Place wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R702)

SeealsoRiC-R756

RiC-R758 Place isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R758)

SeealsoRiC-R759

RiC-R759 Place wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R759)

SeealsoRiC-R758

RiC-R760 Place isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R789)

SeealsoRiC-R761

RiC-R761 Place wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R790)

SeealsoRiC-R760

4.2.14.Concept/ThingRelations

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R762 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Record isassociatedwith(RiC-R72)

SeealsoRiC-R764

RiC-R763 Concept/Thing issubjectof Record hassubject(RiC-R71)

RiC-R764 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Record wasassociatedwith(RiC-R73)

SeealsoRiC-R762

RiC-R765 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith RecordComponent isassociatedwith(RiC-R132)

SeealsoRiC-R767

RiC-R766 Concept/Thing issubjectof RecordComponent hassubject(RiC-R131)

Page 97: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 89

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R767 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith RecordComponent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R133)

SeealsoRiC-R765

RiC-R768 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith RecordSet isassociatedwith(RiC-R202)

SeealsoRiC-R770

RiC-R769 Concept/Thing issubjectof RecordSet hassubject(RiC-R201)

RiC-R770 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith RecordSet wasassociatedwith(RiC-R203)

SeealsoRiC-R768

RiC-R771 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Agent isassociatedwith(RiC-R333)

SeealsoRiC-R772

RiC-R772 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Agent wasassociatedwith(RiC-R334)

SeealsoRiC-R771

RiC-R773 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Occupation isassociatedwith(RiC-R373)

SeealsoRiC-R774

RiC-R774 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Occupation wasassociatedwith(RiC-R374)

SeealsoRiC-R773

RiC-R775 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Position isassociatedwith(RiC-R422)

SeealsoRiC-R776

RiC-R776 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Position wasassociatedwith(RiC-R423)

SeealsoRiC-R775

RiC-R777 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Function isassociatedwith(RiC-R475)

SeealsoRiC-R778

RiC-R778 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Function wasassociatedwith(RiC-R476)

SeealsoRiC-R777

RiC-R779 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Function(Abstract) isassociatedwith(RiC-R507)

SeealsoRiC-R780

RiC-R780 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Function(Abstract) wasassociatedwith(RiC-R508)

SeealsoRiC-R779

RiC-R781 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Activity isassociatedwith(RiC-R559)

SeealsoRiC-R782

Page 98: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiC-CMConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 90

RelationNumber

RelationDomain

RelationName RelationRange InverseRelationNameandNumber

Comments

RiC-R782 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Activity wasassociatedwith(RiC-R560)

SeealsoRiC-R781

RiC-R783 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Mandate isassociatedwith(RiC-R612)

SeealsoRiC-R784

RiC-R784 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Mandate wasassociatedwith(RiC-R613)

SeealsoRiC-R783

RiC-R785 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith DocumentaryForm isassociatedwith(RiC-R642)

SeealsoRiC-R786

RiC-R786 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith DocumentaryForm wasassociatedwith(RiC-R643)

SeealsoRiC-R785

RiC-R787 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Date isassociatedwith(RiC-R705)

SeealsoRiC-R788

RiC-R788 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Date wasassociatedwith(RiC-R706)

SeealsoRiC-R787

RiC-R789 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Place isassociatedwith(RiC-R760)

SeealsoRiC-R790

RiC-R790 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Place wasassociatedwith(RiC-R761)

SeealsoRiC-R789

RiC-R791 Concept/Thing isassociatedwith Concept/Thing isassociatedwith(RiC-R791)

SeealsoRiC-R792

RiC-R792 Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith Concept/Thing wasassociatedwith(RiC-R792)

SeealsoRiC-R791

Page 99: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 91

4.2SharedPropertiesofaRelation# Property DefinitionRiC-P68Date Chronologicalinformationassociatedwiththerelationthat

contributestoitsidentificationandcontextualization.

Scope Ifapplicable,includestheDate(rangeortime)whenthereisarelationbetweentwoentities.Willnotapplytoallrelations.Forexample,willnotapplytorelationstoDate.AdditionalexceptionswillbenotedinfutureRiCreleases.

DataType ISO8601TimeandDateFormat

Examples 1792-08-10;1798-10-30;1720/1780

# Property DefinitionRiC-P69Place Jurisdictionsandnamedgeographicalfeatures.

Scope Includessettlementsofanykind(towns,villages,etc.),historical

regions,politicalandadministrativedistricts,andgeographicalfeatures.Ifapplicable,includesthegeographicaloradministrativepointorarea(e.g.district,country,state)wheretherelationbetweentwoentitiesexists.

DataType ControlledTermorPhrase

Examples AmazonRiver;NovaScotia;Paris

Page 100: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 92

Page 101: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 93

AppendixI:ExampleofArchivalDescriptionConformingtoRiC-CMHereisanillustrativeexampleofarchivaldescriptionconformingtoRiC-CMpresentedasadiagram:

ThisexampleshowssomeinformationaboutP.G.F.Léveau,aFrenchpublicnotaryinthe19thcenturyincluding:• datafromtheArchivesnationalesdeFrance(ANF)(inblue);and• datafromalocalarchivalinstitution,theArchivesdépartementalesduCher(inyellow).

QueryinganddisplayingsuchinterrelateddatamayhelpuserswhowanttoresearchLéveauhimself;orstudythehistoryofthenotariesintheFrenchDepartmentofCherinthe19thcentury;orretrievetherecordscreatedbythenotarieswhoworkedinMehunfrom1820to1840,inwhichmuchinformationaboutthelivesofpeoplewholivedinthatareacanbefound.TheentitiesandrelationsusedaredefinedbyRiC-CM.Whiletherelationsareonlyshowninonedirection,theinverserelationsexist.

Page 102: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 94

Page 103: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 95

AppendixII:ExpertsGrouponArchivalDescriptionMembers

CurrentMembers

NilsBrübach,SächsischesStaatsarchiv(Germany)FlorenceClavaud,Archivesnationales(France)AdrianCunningham,QueenslandStateArchives(Australia)BeatrizFrancoEspiño,MinisteriodeEducación,CulturayDeporte(Spain)MiiaHerrala,Arkistolaitos(Finland)PeteJohnston,ArchivesHub(UnitedKingdom)PadréLydieGnessougouBaroan-Dioumency,DirectionGénéraleduTrésoretdelaComptabilitéPublique(IvoryCoast)GavanMcCarthy,UniversityofMelbourneeScholarshipResearchCentre(Australia)VitorManoelMarquesdaFonseca,ArquivoNacional/UniversidadeFederalFluminense(Brazil)VictoriaPeters,UniversityofStrathclyde(UnitedKingdom)DanielPitti(Chair/Président),UniversityofVirginiaInstituteforAdvancedTechnologyintheHumanities(UnitedStates)Bogdan-FlorinPopovici,ArhiveleNaţionalealeRomâniei(Romania)JavierE.RequejoZalama,MinisteriodeEducación,CulturayDeporte(Spain)StéphanieRoussel,ServiceinterministérieldesArchivesdeFrance(France)AaronRubinstein,UniversityofMassachusettsAmherst(UnitedStates)BillStockting,RoyalArchivesandLibrary(UnitedKingdom)MartinStuerzlinger,Archiversum(Austria)KatherineTimms,LibraryandArchivesCanada/BibliothèqueetArchivesCanada(Canada)SalvatoreVassallo,ArchivumRomanumSocietatisIesu(Italy)StefanoVitali,IstitutoCentralepergliArchivi(Italy)PastMembers

JaanaKilkki,NationalArchives(Finland)AliceMotte,ArchivesdépartementalesdesLandes(France)ClaireSibille,ServiceinterministérieldesArchivesdeFrance(France)

Page 104: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 96

Page 105: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 97

AppendixII:Bibliography1.StandardsandModels

ICAStandards

ISAAR(CPF):InternationalStandardArchivalAuthorityRecordforCorporateBodies,PersonsandFamilies,2ndEdition.(2011)(en),ISAAR(CPF):NormeInternationalesurlesnoticesd’autoritéutiliséespourlesArchivesrelativesauxcollectivités,auxpersonnesouauxfamilles,2èmeédition(fr)

ISAD(G):GeneralInternationalStandardArchivalDescription-Secondedition.(2011).ISAD(G):GeneralInternationalStandardArchivalDescription-Secondedition(en),ISAD(G):Normegénéraleetinternationalededescriptionarchivistique-Deuxièmeédition(fr)

ISDF:InternationalStandardforDescribingFunctions.(2011).ISDF:InternationalStandardforDescribingFunctions(en),ISDF:Normeinternationalepourladescriptiondesfonctions(fr)

ISDIAH:InternationalStandardforDescribingInstitutionswithArchivalHoldings.(2011).ISDIAH:InternationalStandardforDescribingInstitutionswithArchivalHoldings(en),ISDIAH:Normeinternationalepourladescriptiondesinstitutionsdeconservationdesarchives(fr)

ArchivalandRecordKeepingConceptualModels

ArchivesNewZealand.TS:TechnicalSpecificationsforElectronicRecordkeepingMetadataStandard.http://archives.govt.nz/ts-technical-specifications-electronic-recordkeeping-metadata-standard(en)

AS/NZSISO5478RecordkeepingMetadataPropertyReferenceSet(RMPRS).

CNEDA.Modeloconceptualdedescripciónarchivísticayrequisitosdedatosbásicosdelasdescripcionesdedocumentosdearchivo,agentesyfunciones.2012.http://www.mcu.es/archivos/docs/NEDA_MCDA_P1_P2_20120618.pdf(es)

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.ReportontheworkofCNEDA(2007-2012):towardaconceptualmodelforarchivaldescriptioninSpain(July11,2012).2012.http://www.mcu.es/archivos/docs/MC/CNEDA/ReportCNEDA_11_07_2012.pdf(en)

DLMForum.MoReq2010:ModularRequirementsforRecordsSystems.2016.http://moreq.info/

e-GMS-e-GovernmentMetadataStandardVersion3.029April2004.https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/7271/eGMS%20version%203.pdf(en)

International Council on Archives and Australasian Digital Records Initiative. Principles and FunctionalRequirements for Records in Electronic Office Environments, Modules 1-3, 2008, published athttp://www.ica.org.(AlsoadoptedasISO16175:2010/2011)

ISO15489:2016–Informationanddocumentation–Recordsmanagement–Part1:General.

ISO23081:2006–Informationanddocumentation–Recordsmanagementprocesses–Metadataforrecords.

Kilkki,Jaana,OutiHupaniittu,andPekkaHenttonen.Towardstheneweraofarchivaldescription-theFinnishApproach.2012.http://www.arkisto.fi/uploads/Arkistolaitos/Teht%C3%A4v%C3%A4t%20ja%20toiminta/Hankkeet/AHAA/The%20Finnish%20Conceptual%20Model%20of%20Archival%20Description_text.pdf(en)

Page 106: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 98

NationalArchivesofAustralia.AustralianGovernmentRecordkeepingMetadataStandard.Version2.2.2015.http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS-Version-2.2-June-2015_tcm16-47131.pdf(en)

SPIRTResearchTeam.AustralianRecordkeepingMetadataSchema.Version1.0.2000.http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/projects/spirt/deliverables/rkmsgen-tech-intro.pdf(en)

ArchivalDescriptiveContentStandards

CanadianCouncilofArchives.RulesforArchivalDescription(RAD).Revisedversion.2008.http://www.cdncouncilarchives.ca/RAD/RADComplete_July2008.pdf(en);http://www.cdncouncilarchives.ca/RAD/RDDAComplete_July2008.pdf(fr)

SocietyofAmericanArchivists.DescribingArchives:AContentStandard(DACS).2nded.2013.http://files.archivists.org/pubs/DACS-2007.pdf

ArchivalCommunicationStandards

EncodedArchivalContext-CorporateBodies,Persons,andFamilies(EAC-CPF).http://eac.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/index.php(en);http://www.archivesdefrance.culture.gouv.fr/gerer/classement/normes-outils/eac/(fr)

EncodedArchivalDescription(EAD).VersionEAD31.0.Schema:https://github.com/SAA-SDT/EAD3/releases/tag/v1.0.0;TagLibrary:http://www.loc.gov/ead/EAD3taglib/index.html

RelatedConceptualModelsandStandards

CIDOCConceptualReferenceModel.Version6.2.2.2016.http://www.cidoc-crm.org/official_release_cidoc.html(en);http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/crm_french_version.pdf(fr);officialISOstandardversion:21127:2006Informationanddocumentation–Areferenceontologyfortheinterchangeofculturalheritageinformation.http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=34424

Europeana.EuropeanaDataModelDocumentation.[2016].http://pro.europeana.eu/page/edm-documentation(en)

IFLA.FunctionalRequirementsforBibliographicRecords.2008.http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf(en)http://www.bnf.fr/documents/frbr_rapport_final.pdf(fr)

IFLAWorkingGrouponFRBR/CRM.DraftdefinitionofFRBRoo.http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/FRBRoo_V9.1_PR.pdf(en).

LODE:AnontologyforLinkingOpenDescriptionsofEvents.http://linkedevents.org/ontology/(en)

W3CProv[provenance].http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-prov-overview-20130312/2.ArchivalProfessionalLiterature

Altman,B.,andJ.R.Nemmers.2001.“TheUsabilityofOnlineArchivalResources:ThePolarisProjectFindingAid.”

Page 107: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 99

AmericanArchivist64(1):121-131.

AustralianSocietyofArchivists.2007.DescribingArchivesinContext:AGuidetoAustralasianPractice.Dickson:AustralianSocietyofArchivists.

AustralianSocietyofArchivists,PeterJ.Scott,andAdrianCunningham.2010.TheArrangementandDescriptionofArchivesAmidAdministrativeandTechnologicalChange:EssaysandReflectionsbyandAboutPeterJ.Scott.

Bailey,Jefferson.2013.“DisrespectdesFonds:RethinkingArrangementandDescriptioninBorn-DigitalArchives.”ArchiveJournal3.http://www.archivejournal.net/issue/3/archives-remixed/disrespect-des-fonds-rethinking-arrangement-and-description-in-born-digital-archives/

Barr,Debra.1987-1988.“TheFondsConceptintheWorkingGrouponArchivalDescriptiveStandardsReport.”Archivaria25:163-170.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1989.“Protectingprovenance:ResponsetotheReportoftheWorkingGrouponDescriptionattheFondsLevel.Archivaria28:141-145.

BartlettNancy.1991.“RespectdesFonds:TheOriginsoftheModernPrincipleofProvenance.”InBibliographicFoundationsofFrenchHistoricalStudies.Vol.1(1-2)ofPrimarySourcesandOriginalWorks.NewYork:HaworthPress.

Bastian,JeanetteAllis.2003-2004.“Ina‘HouseofMemory’:DiscoveringtheProvenanceofPlace.”ArchivalIssues28:9-19.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“ReadingColonialRecordsthroughanArchivalLens:TheProvenanceofPlace,SpaceandCreation.”ArchivalScience6:267-284.

Bearman,David.1989.ArchivalMethods.Pittsburgh:ArchivesandMuseumInformatics.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1992.“DocumentingDocumentation.”Archivaria34:33-49.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1996.“ItemLevelControlandElectronicRecordkeeping.”ArchivesandMuseumInformatics10:195-245.

Bearman,David,andR.H.Lytle.1985-1986.“ThePowerofthePrincipleofProvenance.”Archivaria21:14-27.

Beattie,Heather.2009.“WhereNarrativesMeet:ArchivalDescription,Provenance,andWomen’sDiaries.”PapersfromtheThirdInternationalConferenceontheHistoryofRecordsandArchives.LibrariesandtheCulturalRecord44(1):82-100.

BergerStefan.2013."TheroleofnationalarchivesinconstructingnationalmasternarrativesinEurope",ArchivalScience,13,1:1-22.

Blouin,Jr.,Francis,andWilliamRosenberg.2013.ProcessingthePast.ContestingAuthorityinHistoryandtheArchives.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Boles,Frank.1982.“DisrespectingOriginalOrder.”AmericanArchivist45(1):26-32.

BoutierRobertHenry,1968."Laphasecrucialedel'histoiredesarchives:laconstitutiondesdépotsd'archivesetlanaissancedel'archivistique(XVI-débutduXIXsiècle).",ArchivumXVIII:139-149.

BrennekeAdolf.1953.Archivkunde.EinBeitragzurThéorieundGeschichtedesEuropäischenArchivwesens,Leipzig:

Page 108: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 100

KœhlerundAmelang.

Brothman,Brien.1991.“OrdersofValue:ProbingtheTheoreticalTermsofArchivalPractice.”Archivaria32:78-100.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1999.“DecliningDerrida:Integrity,Tensegrity,andthePreservationofArchivesfromDeconstruction.”Archivaria48:64-88.

Bruebach,Nils.2003.“ArchivalScienceinGermany–Traditions,DevelopmentsandPerspectives.”ArchivalScience3:379–399

CookMichael.1993.InformationManagementandArchivalData.London:LibraryAssociationPublishing.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1996.“TheInternationalDescriptiveStandards:NewDepartures.”Archivi&Computer6:259-266.

Cook,Terry.1992.“TheConceptoftheArchivalFonds:Theory,Description,andProvenanceinthePost-CustodialEra.”InTheArchivalFonds:FromTheorytoPractice,ed.T.Eastwood.Ottawa:BureauofCanadianArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1993.“What’sPastisPrologue:AHistoryofArchivalIdeassince1898,andtheFutureParadigmShift.”Archivaria43:17-63.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001a.“ArchivalScienceandPostmodernism:NewFormulationsforOldConcepts.”ArchivalScience1:3-24.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001b.“FashionableNonsenseorProfessionalRebirth:PostmodernismandthePracticeofArchives.”Archivaria51:14-35.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“RememberingtheFuture:AppraisalofRecordsandtheRoleofArchivesinConstructingSocialMemory.”InArchives,Documentation,andInstitutionsofSocialMemory:EssaysfromtheSawyerSeminar,ed.F.X.BlouinandW.G.Rosenberg.AnnArbor:UniversityofMichiganPress.

CottaIreneandMannoToluRosaliaeds.1968.Archiviestorianell'EuropadelXIXsecolo:alleradicidell'identitàculturaleeuropea,Roma:MinisteroperiBenieleAttivitàculturali,Direzionegeneralepergliarchivi,2006.

Cox,R.J.2004.NoInnocentDeposits:FormingArchivesbyRethinkingAppraisal.Lanham:ScarecrowPress.

Cunningham,Adrian.2000a.“RecentDevelopmentsinStandardsforArchivalDescriptionandMetadata.”IASAJournal16:14-24.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001b.“SixDegreesofSeparation:AustralianMetadataInitiativesandtheirRelationshipswithInternationalStandards.”ArchivalScience1:271-283.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2012.“PeterJ.ScottandtheAustralian‘Series’System:ItsOrigins,Features,Rationale,ImpactandContinuingRelevance.”InternationalCongressonArchives,Brisbane,Australia,23August2012.

Cunningham,Adrian,LauraMillar,andBarbaraReed.2013."PeterJ.ScottandtheAustralian‘series’system:itsorigins,features,rationale,impactandcontinuingrelevance."Comma2013(1),pp.121–144.

Davis,S.E.2003.“DescriptiveStandardsandtheArchivalProfession.”CatalogingandClassificationQuarterly35:291-308.

Dodge,Bernadine.2002.“AcrosstheGreatDivide:ArchivalDiscourseandRepresentationsofthePastinLate-

Page 109: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 101

ModernSociety.”Archivaria53:16-30.

Douglas,Jennifer.2007.“DigitizationandtheArchivalRecord.”PaperpresentedattheAnnualMeetingoftheAssociationofCanadianArchivists,Kingston,Ontario.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2010.“Origins:EvolvingIdeasaboutthePrincipleofProvenance.”InCurrentsofArchivalThinking,byHeatherMacNeilandTerryEastwood.SantaBarbara,CA:LibrariesUnlimited.

Duchein,Michel.1977.“Lerespectdes fondsenarchivistique:Principesthéoriquesetproblèmespratiques.".LaGazettedesArchives97:71-96;

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1983.“TheoreticalPrinciplesandPracticalProblemsofRespectdesFondsinArchivalScience.”Archivaria16:64-82.

Duff,Wendy.M.2001.“EvaluatingMetadataonaMetalevel.”ArchivalScience1:285-294.

Duff,Wendy.M.,andK.M.Haworth.1990/1991.“TheReclamationofArchivalDescription:TheCanadianPerspective.”Archivaria31:26-35.

Duff,Wendy.M.,andP.Stoyanova.1998.“TransformingtheCrazyQuilt:ArchivalDisplaysfromaUsers’PointofView.”Archivaria45:44-79.

Duff,Wendy.M.,andV.Harris.2002.“StoriesandNames:ArchivalDescriptionasNarratingRecordsandConstructingMeanings.”ArchivalScience2:263-285.

Duranti,Luciana.1989."TheOdysseyofRecordsManagers."RecordsManagementQuarterly23,3and4(1989):3-11and3-11.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1993."OriginandDevelopmentoftheConceptofArchivalDescription,"Archivaria35:47-54.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1997."TheArchivalBond,"ArchivesandMuseumInformatics11,3-4:213-218.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1998.Diplomatics:NewUsesforanOldScience.Chicago:SAA,ACAandScarecrowPress.

Duranti,Luciana,FranksPatricia,eds.2015.EncyclopediaofArchivalScience.Lanham,MD:Rowman&LittlefieldPublishingGroup.

Eastwood,Terry.1990.“PuttingthePartsoftheWholeTogether:ASystematicApproachtoAccesstoInformationfromtheArchivesofContemporaryAdministration.”PaperdeliveredataSeminaronArrangementandDescriptionofArchives,Weimar.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1992.“Generalintroduction.”InTheArchivalFonds:FromTheorytoPractice,ed.T.Eastwoood.Ottawa:BureauofCanadianArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2000.“PuttingthePartsoftheWholeTogether:SystematicArrangementofArchives.”Archivaria50:93-116.

Evans,Joanne,S.McKemmish,andK.Bhoday.2005.“CreateOnce,UseManyTimes:TheCleverUseofRecordkeepingMetadataforMultipleArchivalPurposes.”ArchivalScience5(1):17-42.

Evans,Max.J.1986.“AuthorityControl:AnAlternativetotheRecordGroupConcept.”AmericanArchivist49(3):249-261.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2007.“ArchivesofthePeople,BythePeople,ForthePeople.”AmericanArchivist70(2):387-400.

Page 110: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 102

Fenyo,M.D.1966.“TheRecordGroupConcept:ACritique.”AmericanArchivist29(2):229-239.

Fischer,G.L.1973.“LettingtheArchivalDustSettle:SomeRemarksontheRecordGroupConcept.”JournaloftheSocietyofArchivists4:640-645.

Gilliland,Anne,N.Rouche,L.Lindberg,andJ.Evans.2005.“Towardsa21stCenturyMetadataInfrastructureSupportingtheCreation,PreservationandUseofTrustworthyRecords:DevelopingtheInterPARES2MetadataSchemaRegistry.”ArchivalScience5(1):43-78.

Gilliland-Swetland,Anne.J.2001.“PopularizingtheFindingAid:ExploitingEADtoEnhanceOnlineDiscoveryandRetrievalinArchivalInformationSystemsbyDiverseUserGroups.”InEncodedArchivalDescriptionontheInternet,ed.D.V.PittiandW.M.Duff.NewYork:HaworthPress.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2000.EnduringParadigm,NewOpportunities:TheValueoftheArchivalPerspectiveintheDigitalEnvironment.Washington,D.C.:CouncilonInformationandLibraryResources.

Greene,Mark.A.,andD.Meissner.2005.“MoreProduct,LessProcess:RevampingTraditionalArchivalProcessing.”AmericanArchivist68(2):208-263.

Gueguen, Gretchen, V. M. Marques da Fonseca, D. Pitti, and C. Sibille-de Grimoüard. 2013. “Toward anInternational Conceptual Model for Archival Description: A Preliminary Report from the InternationalCouncilonArchives'ExpertsGrouponArchivalDescription."TheAmericanArchivist76(2):567-584

GuercioMaria.1993.“ArchivalTheoryandthePrincipleofProvenanceforCurrentRecords:TheirImpactonArrangingandInventoryingElectronicRecords,”inSwedishNationalArchives,ThePrincipleofProvenance:ReportfromtheFirstStockholmConferenceonArchivalTheoryandthePrincipleofProvenance,2–3September1993(Stockholm,1994).

Haworth,K.M.1992.“ThePrinciplesSpeakforThemselves:ArticulatingaLanguageofPurposeforArchives.”InTheArchivalImagination:EssaysinHonourofHughA.Taylor,ed.B.L.Craig.Ottawa:AssociationofCanadianArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1993.“TheVoyageofRAD:FromtheOldWorldtotheNew.”Archivaria36:5-12.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001.“ArchivalDescription:ContentandContextinSearchofStructure.”InEncodedArchivalDescriptionontheInternet,ed.D.V.PittiandW.M.Duff.NewYork:HaworthPress.

Hedstrom,M.1993.“DescriptivePracticesforElectronicRecords:DecidingwhatisEssentialandImaginingwhatisPossible.”Archivaria36:53-63.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“Archives,Memory,andInterfaceswiththePast.”ArchivalScience2:21-43.

HensenS. L.1989.PersonalPapers,andManuscripts:ACataloguingManual forArchivalRepositories.HistoricalSocieties,andManuscriptLibraries.Chicago:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001.“ArchivalCatalogingandtheInternet:TheImplicationsandImpactofEAD.”InEncodedarchivaldescriptionontheinternet,ed.D.V.PittiandW.M.Duff.NewYork:HaworthPress.

Holmes,Oliver.W.1964.“ArchivalArrangement:FiveDifferentOperationsatFiveDifferentLevels.”AmericanArchivist27(1):21-41.

Horsman,Peter.1994.“TamingtheElephant:AnOrthodoxApproachtothePrincipleofProvenance.”InThePrincipleofProvenance:ReportfronttheFirstStockholmConferenceonArchivalTheoryandthePrincipleofProvenance,September2-3,1993,ed.K.AbukhanfusaandJ.Sydbeck.Stockholm:Riksarkivet.

Page 111: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 103

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1999a.“ArchivalDescriptionfromaDistantView.”http://www.asap.unimelb.edu.au/asa/stama/conf/WWKHorsman.htm.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1999b.“DirtyHands:ANewPerspectiveontheOriginalOrder.”ArchivesandManuscripts27:42-53.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“TheLastDanceofthePhoenix,orTheDe-discoveryoftheArchivalFonds.”Archivaria54:1-23.

HurleyChris.1994.“TheAustralian‘Series’System:AnExposition.”InTheRecordsContinuum:IanMacleanandAustralianArchivesFirstFiftyYears,ed.S.McKemmishandM.Piggott.Clayton:AncoraPress.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1995.ProblemswithProvenance.ArchivesandManuscripts23:234-259.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1995."AmbientFunctions-AbandonedChildrentoZoos."Archivaria40:21-39.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1996.“BeatingtheFrench,”ArchivesandManuscripts24,1:12-18.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1998.“TheMakingandtheKeepingofRecords:(1)WhatAreFindingAidsfor?”ArchivesandManuscripts26,1:58-77

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2000.“TheMakingandtheKeepingofRecords:(2)TheTyrannyofListing.”ArchivesandManuscripts28:8-23.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“RelationshipsinRecords.”InNewZealandArchivistSummer,4:6-9.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2005.“ParallelProvenance[Seriesofparts]:Part1:What,ifanything,isarchivaldescription?”ArchivesandManuscripts33:110-145.

ICA/CBPS.2012a.“CBPS-ProgressReportforRevisingandHarmonisingICADescriptiveStandards.”http://www.ica.org/en/cbps-progress-report-revising-and-harmonising-ica-descriptive-standards

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2012b.“CBPS-RelationshipsinArchivalDescriptiveSystems.”http://www.ica.org/en/cbps-relationship-archival-descriptive-systems

INTERPARESprojectfindings(1:1998-2001;2:2002-2007;3:2007-2012;4:2013-2018).http://www.interpares.org/

Jenkinson,Hilary.1937.AManualofArchiveAdministrationIncludingtheProblemsofWarArchivesandArchiveMaking.2nded.London:P.Lund,Humphries.

JinfangNiu.2013a.“Provenance:CrossingBoundaries.”ArchivesandManuscripts41:2,105-115.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯. 2013b. “Recordkeeping Metadata and Archival Description: A Revisit.” Archives and Manuscripts41(3):203-251.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯2015.“OriginalOrderintheDigitalWorld.”ArchivesandManuscripts43:1,61-72

KetelaarEric.2001.“TacitNarratives:TheMeaningofArchives.”ArchivalScience1:131-141.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“ArchivalTemples,ArchivalPrisons:ModesofPowerandProtection.”ArchivalScience2:221-238

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2005.“Sharing:CollectedMemoriesinCommunitiesofRecords.”ArchivesandManuscripts33:44-61.

Koltun,Lily.1999.“ThePromiseandThreatofDigitalOptionsinanArchivalAge.”Archivaria44:114-135.

Kooyman,S.M.1994.“RADandtheResearcher.”Archivaria37:104-110.

Page 112: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 104

KrauseM.G.andE.Yakel.2007."InteractioninVirtualArchives:ThePolarBearExpeditionDigitalCollectionsNextGenerationFindingAid.”TheAmericanArchivist70(2):282-314.

Krawczyk, Bob. 1999. “Cross Reference Heaven: The Abandonment of the Fonds as the Primary Level ofArrangementforOntarioGovernmentRecords.”Archivaria48:131–153.

Lemieux,Victoria.2001.“LettheGhostsSpeak:AnEmpiricalExplorationofthe‘Nature’oftheRecord.”Archivaria51:81-111.

Light,M.2007.“MovingBeyondtheName:DefiningCorporateEntitiestoSupportProvenance-BasedAccess.”JournalofArchivalOrganization5:49-74.

Light,M.andT.Hyry.2002.“ColophonsandAnnotations:NewDirectionsfortheFindingAid.”AmericanArchivist65(2):216-230.

Livelton,Trevor.1996.ArchivalTheory,RecordsandthePublic.Landham,MI:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

Lodolini,Elio.2005.Archivistica:Principieproblemi.12thed.Milano:F.Angeli.

Lytle,R.H.1980a.“IntellectualAccesstoArchives:I.ProvenanceandContentIndexingMethodsofSubjectRetrieval.”AmericanArchivist43(1):64-75.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1980b.“IntellectualAccesstoArchives:II.ReportofanExperimentComparingProvenanceandContentIndexingMethodsofSubjectRetrieval.”AmericanArchivist43(2):191-207.

MacNeil, Heather, 1992. “The Context is All: Describing a Fonds and its Parts in Accordancewith the Rules forArchivalDescription,”inTheArchivalFonds:FromTheorytoPractice,TerryEastwood,ed.Ottawa,BureauofCanadianArchivists,PlanningCommitteeonDescriptiveStandards.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1995.“MetadataStrategiesandArchivalDescription:ComparingApplestoOranges.”Archivaria39:22-32.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1996.“TheImplicationsoftheUBCResearchResultsforArchivalDescriptioninGeneralandtheCanadianRulesforArchivalDescriptioninParticular.”Archivi&Computer6:239-246.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2005.“PickingourText:ArchivalDescription,Authenticity,andtheArchivistasEditor.”AmericanArchivist68(2):265-278.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“Touchstones:ConsideringtheRelationshipbetweenMemoryandArchives.”Archivaria61:105-126.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2008.“Archivalterity:RethinkingOriginalOrder.”Archivaria66:1-24.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2009.“TrustingDescription:Authenticity,Accountability,andArchivalDescriptionStandards.”JournalofArchivalOrganization7:89-107.

Malin,G.2002.“DigitizeThis!TheImpactofDigitalCollectionsonArchivalDescription.”JournalofArchivalOrganization1:65-76.

McKemmish,Sue.1994.“AreRecordsEverActual?”InTheRecordsContinuum:IanMacleanandAustralianArchivesFirstFiftyYears,ed.S.McKemmishandM.Piggott.Clayton:AncoraPress.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2001.“PlacingRecordsContinuumTheoryandPractice.”ArchivalScience1(4):333-359.

McKemmish,Sue,G.Acland,N.Ward,andB.Reed.1999.“DescribingRecordsinContextintheContinuum:The

Page 113: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 105

AustralianRecordkeepingMetadataSchema.”Archivaria48:3-43.

McKemmish,Sue,andD.Parer.1998.“TowardsFrameworksforStandardisingRecordkeepingMetadata.”ArchivesandManuscripts26:24-45.

McKemmish,Sue,A.Gilliland-Swetland,andE.Ketelaar.2005.“‘CommunitiesofMemory’:PluralisingArchivalResearchandEducationAgendas.”ArchivesandManuscripts33:146-175.

Meehan,Jennifer.2009.“MakingtheLeapfromPartstoWhole:EvidenceandInferenceinArchivalArrangementandDescription.”TheAmericanArchivist,72(1):72-90

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2010.“RethinkingOriginalOrderandPersonalRecords.”Archivaria70:27-44.

Menne-Haritz,A.1994.“AppraisalorSelection:CanaContentOrientedAppraisalbeHarmonizedwiththePrincipleofProvenance?”InThePrincipleofProvenance:ReportfromtheFirstStockholmConferenceonArchivalTheoryandthePrincipleofProvenance,September2-3,1993,ed.K.AbukhanfusaandJ.Sydbeck.Stockholm:Riksarkivet.

Michetti,Giovanni.2012.“ArchivesAreNotTrees.HierarchicalRepresentationsinDigitalEnvironment.”TheMemoryoftheWorldintheDigitalAge:DigitizationandPreservation.AnInternationalConferenceonPermanentAccesstoDigitalDocumentaryHeritage.Vancouver,BritishColumbia,Canada.

Millar,Laura.2002.“TheDeathoftheFondsandtheResurrectionofProvenance:ArchivalContextinSpaceandTime.”Archivaria53:1-15.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“AnObligationofTrust:SpeculationsonAccountabilityandDescription.”AmericanArchivist69(1):60-78.

Muller,Samuel,J.A.Feith,andR.Fruin.2003.TheManualfortheArrangementandDescriptionofArchives.2nded.,trans.byArthurH.Leavitt.Chicago:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

NesmithTom.1993a.“Introduction,”inCanadianArchivalStudiesandtheRediscoveryofProvenance,ed.byTomNesmith.Metuchen,NJ:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1993b.“ArchivalStudiesinEnglish-SpeakingCanadaandtheNorthAmericanRediscoveryofProvenance.”InCanadianArchivalStudiesandtheRediscoveryofProvenance,ed.T.Nesmith.Metuchen:ScarecrowPress.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1999.“StillFuzzybutMoreAccurate:SomeThoughtsonthe‘Ghosts’ofArchivalTheory.”Archivaria47:136-150.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“SeeingArchives:PostmodernismandtheChangingIntellectualPlaceofArchives.”AmericanArchivist65(1):24-41.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2005.“ReopeningArchives:BringingNewContextualitiesintoArchivalTheoryandPractice.”Archivaria60:259-274.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“TheConceptofSocietalProvenanceandRecordsofNineteenth-CenturyAboriginal-EuropeanRelationsinWesternCanada:ImplicationsforArchivalTheoryandPractice.”ArchivalScience6(3-4):351-360.

Nordland,LoriPodolski.2001.“TheConceptof‘Secondaryprovenance’:Re-interpretingAckomokki’sMapasEvolvingText.”Archivaria58:147-159.

Ottosson,P.2006.“AuthorityFileInformationinArchives.”InternationalCataloguingandBibliographicControl

Page 114: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 106

35:57-58.

Peters,V.2005.“DevelopingArchivalContextStandardsforFunctionsintheHigherEducationSector.”JournaloftheSocietyofArchivists26:75-85.

Piggot,Michael.2005a.“Archivesandmemory.”InArchives:Recordkeepinginsociety,ed.bySueMcKemmishandBarbaraReed.WaggaWagga,NSW:CentreforInformationStudies,CharlesSturtUniversity.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2005b.“BuildingCollectiveMemoryArchives.”ArchivesandManuscripts33:62-83.

Piggott,Michael,andS.McKemmish.2002.Recordkeeping,ReconciliationandPoliticalReality,http://www.sims.monash.edu.au/research/rcrg/publications/piggottmckemmish2002.pdf

Pitti,DanielV.1999.“EncodedArchivalDescription:AnIntroductionandOverview.”D-LibMagazine5(11).http://dlib.org/dlib/november99/11pitti.html

Pitti,DanielV.,andW.M.Duff,eds.2001.EncodedArchivalDescriptionontheInternet.NewYork:HaworthPress.

Pohjola,Raimo.1994.“ThePrincipleofProvenanceandtheArrangementofRecords/Archives.”InThePrincipleofProvenance:ReportfromtheFirstStockholmConferenceontheArchivalPrincipleofProvenance,September2-3,1993.Stockholm:SwedishNationalArchives.

Posner,Ernst.2006a.“MaxLehmannandtheGenesisofthePrincipleofProvenance.”InArchivesandthePublicInterest,ed.byKenMunden.Chicago:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006b.“SomeAspectsofArchivalDevelopmentsincetheFrenchRevolution.”InArchivesandthePublicInterest,ed.byKenMunden.Chicago:SocietyofAmericanArchivists.

Powell,GraemeT.1976.“ArchivalPrinciplesandtheTreatmentofPersonalPapers.”ArchivesandManuscripts6:259-268.

Procter,M.,andM.Cook.2000.AManualofArchivalDescription,3rded.Aldershot:Gower.

Prom,Chris.2004.“UserInteractionswithElectronicFindingAidsinaControlledSetting.”AmericanArchivist67(2):234-268.

Ricci,IsabellaMassabòandM.Carassi,eds.2000.ScrittidiTeoriaArchivisticaItaliana.RassegnaBibliografica.Roma:Ministeroperibenieleattivitaculturali,UfficiocentraleperIbeniarchivistici.

Roper,M.1992.“TheDevelopmentofthePrinciplesofProvenanceandRespectforOriginalOrderinthePublicRecordOffice.”InTheArchivalImagination:EssaysinHonourofHughA.Taylor,ed.B.L.Craig.Ottawa:AssociationofCanadianArchivists.

Savoja,Maurizio,andVitali,Stefano.2007.“AuthorityControlforCreatorsinItaly:TheoryandPractice.”JournalofArchivalOrganization5:121-147.

Schmandt-Besserat,Denise.1996.HowWritingCameAbout.Austin:UniversityofTexasPress.

Scheir,W.2005.“FirstEntry:ReportonaQualitativeExploratoryStudyofNoviceUserExperiencewithOnlineFindingAids.”JournalofArchivalOrganization3:49-85.

Schellenberg,T.R.1956.ModernArchives:PrinciplesandTechniques.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

Page 115: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 107

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1965.TheManagementofArchives.NewYork:ColumbiaUniversityPress.

Scott,Peter.J.1966.“TheRecordGroupConcept:ACaseforAbandonment.”AmericanArchivist29(4):493-504.

Scott,PeterJ.,G.Finlay,C.D.Smith,H.Rowell.1978-1981.“ArchivesandAdministrativeChange:SomeMethodsandApproaches”,Part1-5,ArchivesandManuscripts.Part1in7:Vol.7,No.3(August1978),pp.115–127;Part2in7:Vol.7,No.4(April1979),pp.151–165.Part3in7:Vol.8,No.1(June1980),pp.41–54.Part4in7:Vol.8,No.2(December1980),pp.51–69.Part5in7:Vol.9,No.1(September1981),pp.3–18.

Sexton,Anna,andC.Turner.2003.“ExpandingtheRoleofEAD:ProvidingAdequateMetadataforDigitalaswellasOriginalArchiveDocuments.”Vine32(4):71-80.

Stibbe,HugoL.P.1992.“ImplementingtheConceptofFonds:PrimaryAccessPoint,MultilevelDescriptionandAuthorityControl.”Archivaria34:109-137.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1998.“StandardisingDescription:TheExperienceofUsingISAD(G).”Janus1:132-152.

Sweeney,Shelley.2008.“TheAmbiguousOriginsoftheArchivalPrincipleofProvenance.”LibrariesandtheCulturalRecord43:193-213.

Szary,RichardV.1985.“ExpandingtheRoleofAuthorityFilesintheArchivalContext.”Paperpresentedatsemi-annualmeetingofAnnualMeetingofSocietyofAmericanArchivists,November1,1985.

Tamble,Donato.2001.“ArchivalTheoryinItalyToday.”ArchivalScience1:83-100.

Taylor,HughA.1983.“TheCollectiveMemory:ArchivesandLibrariesasHeritage.”Archivaria15:118-130.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.1995.“’Heritage’Revisited:DocumentsasArtifactsintheContextofMuseumsandMaterialCulture,”Archivaria40:8-20.

SwedishNationalArchives.1993.ThePrincipleofProvenance:ReportfromtheFirstStockholmConferenceontheArchivalPrincipleofProvenance,September2-3,1993.Stockholm.

Thomassen,TheoH.P.M.1999.“TheDevelopmentofArchivalScienceanditsEuropeanDimension.”InTheArchivistandtheArchivalScience:SeminarforAnnaChristinaUlfsparreFebruary10-11,1999attheSwedishNationalArchives.Lund:LandsarkivetsILund.

VanCamp,A.2001.“ProvidingUnifiedAccesstoInternationalPrimaryResourcesintheHumanities.”InEncodedArchivalDescriptionontheInternet,ed.D.V.PittiandW.M.Duff.NewYork:HaworthPress.

Vitali,Stefano.1998.“SurfingwithoutGoingoffCourse:AnArchivalDescriptionSystemfortheInternet.”InElectronicAccess:ArchivesintheNewMillennium,ConferenceProceedingsJune1-4,1998.London:PublicRecordOffice.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2002.“TheArchiveattheTimeofitsInstitution:TheCentralArchiveofFrancescoBonaini.”InTheFlorenceStateArchive:ThirteenCenturiesofHistoricalRecords,ed.byRosalieMannoTuloandAnnaBellinazzi.Florence:NardiniEditore.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2006.“WhatAretheBoundariesofArchivalContext?TheSIASFIProjectandtheOnlineGuidetotheFlorenceStateArchives,”JournalofArchivalOrganization,3,2-3:243-260.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2014.“Ladescrizionearchivisticaaltempodeglistandardedeisistemiinformatici”,inArchivistica.Teorie,metodi,pratiche,MariaGuercioandLindaGiuvaeds.Roma:Carocci:179-210

Page 116: INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES CONSEIL · PDF fileinternational council on archives conseil international des archives experts group on archival description records in contexts

RiCConsultationDraftv0.1 September2016 108

Wallace,D.1995.“ManagingthePresent:MetadataasArchivalDescription.”Archivaria39:11-21.

Westbrook,B.D.2002.“ProspectingVirtualCollections.”JournalofArchivalOrganization1:73-80.

Wurl,Joel.2005.“EthnicityasProvenance:InSearchofValuesandPrinciplesforDocumentingtheImmigrantExperience.”ArchivalIssues29:65-76.

Yakel,Elizabeth.2003.“ArchivalRepresentation.”ArchivalScience3:1-25.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2004.“EncodedArchivalDescription:AreFindingAidsBoundarySpannersorBarriersforUsers?”JournalofArchivalOrganization2(1):63-77.

Yeo,Geoffrey.2005.“UnderstandingUsersandUse:AMarketSegmentationApproach.”JournaloftheSocietyofArchivists26:25-53.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2007.“ConceptsofRecord(1):Evidence,Information,andPersistentRepresentations.”AmericanArchivist70(2):315-43.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2008.“ConceptsofRecord(2):PrototypesandBoundaryObjects.”AmericanArchivist71(1):118-43.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2009.“CustodialHistory,Provenance,andtheDescriptionofPersonalRecords.”LibrariesandtheCulturalRecord44(1):50-64.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2010“DebatesaboutDescription.”InCurrentsofArchivalThinking,ed.byHeatherMacNeilandTerryEastwood.SantaBarbara,CA:LibrariesUnlimited.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯.2012.“TheConceptualFondsandthePhysicalCollection.”Archivaria73:43-80.