Top Banner
INEQUALITY & GROWTH
36

Inequality & Growth

Dec 31, 2015

Download

Documents

dolan-wolfe

Inequality & Growth. Moritz Nagel Lois Hales Charles Leury Oleksandr Bevz. Outline. Hypotheses Context Setting Measures Causes & Mitigating Factors Snapshot 2009 Conceptualization Debate Conclusion. Hypotheses. Inequality has a positive impact on growth. 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Inequality & Growth

INEQUALITY & GROWTH

Page 2: Inequality & Growth

Outline

Hypotheses Context

Setting Measures Causes & Mitigating Factors Snapshot 2009

Conceptualization Debate Conclusion

Page 3: Inequality & Growth

Hypotheses

Inequality has a positive impact on growth

1

Inequality has a negative impact on

growth

2

Page 4: Inequality & Growth

What are we talking about?

Inequality: all disparities in the distribution of… Income & assets Consumption Opportunity Social welfare (TRD)

Between who? Countries Individuals & groups within countries

Context

Page 5: Inequality & Growth

How do we measure inequality?

Datasets UNU-WIDER World Income Inequality Database, Version

2.0c, May 2008 Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire, "A New Data Set

Measuring Income Inequality", The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3): 565-91, 1996.

• Gini index• Hoover index• Theil index

Context

Page 6: Inequality & Growth

What causes inequality?Contex

t

Page 7: Inequality & Growth

Mitigating factors

Market driven Propensity to spend Unionization Etc.

Government sponsored Public education Progressive taxation Minimum wage legislation Nationalization of products

Context

Page 8: Inequality & Growth

Snapshot 2009Context

Page 9: Inequality & Growth

Conceptualization

A social welfare measure may present a more revealing picture than income per capita taken by itself. (Sen 1973)

SW = income per capita * (1 – GINI)SW = income per capita * (1 – GINI)

Page 10: Inequality & Growth

Conceptualization

A social welfare measure may present a more revealing picture than income per capita taken by itself. (Sen 1973)

SW = income per capita * (1 – GINI)SW = income per capita * (1 – GINI)

Social Welfare, annual average, 1992 - 2007

(Global Ø (64.8) between 8. and 9. at 2,759)

Page 11: Inequality & Growth

Conceptualization

Social Welfare, annual average, 1992 - 2007

(Global Ø (64.8) between 8. and 9. at 2,759)

What about Total Relative Deprivation?

Page 12: Inequality & Growth

Conceptualization

What about Total Relative Deprivation?

TRD = (income per capita – SW) * populationTRD = (income per capita – SW) * population

Total Relative Deprivation, annual average, 1992 - 2007

Page 13: Inequality & Growth

When we discuss income inequality as Development Economists, we implicitly talk about poverty reduction.

Let’s assume that subsistence needs are met, is there global equality of opportunity?

Exhibit A:A person's location and her social class account for more than 90% of her

position in global income distribution. 60% is explained by location, the rest by social class. Not more than 20% can be attributed to effort. (Milanovic 2007)

Exhibit B:While average years of schooling have risen dramatically in the developing

world (from 2.1 years in 1950 to 7.1 years in 2010), there are substantial differences in the rates of return to human capital of an additional year of schooling between regions. (Barro and Lee 2010)

Conceptualization

Page 14: Inequality & Growth

Source: Barro and Lee 2010, p. 43.

Rates of Return to an Additional Year of Schooling

Conceptualization

Page 15: Inequality & Growth

Sustainable Growth vs. Equitable Growth?

► There is no such thing as indefinitely sustainable growth in a closed

ecosystem as our planet.

→ Possibility of a growth ceiling (annual or total) due to:

- market saturation/ overproduction

- eventual lack of resources (e.g. copper, oil, etc.)

- pollution/ climate change

- …?

But: Economic growth is very likely not a zero-sum game.

Conceptualization

Page 16: Inequality & Growth

Preliminary conclusions?

► Inequalities can manifest themselves in quite subtle ways in

addition to (or as a result of) income inequality.

► It is a qualitative choice whether we talk about equality or equity.

While both describe more or less the same phenomenon, their

respective vantage points beg to differ.

► The question of whether income inequality fosters or hinders

economic growth may miss the target altogether.

Conceptualization

Page 17: Inequality & Growth

Simon Kuznets (1955):

"How can either the institutional and political framework of the underdeveloped societies or the

processes of economic growth and industrialization be modified to favor a sustained rise to higher levels of economic performance and yet avoid the fatally

simple remedy of an authoritarian regime that would use the population as cannon-fodder in the fight for

economic achievement?"

"How can either the institutional and political framework of the underdeveloped societies or the

processes of economic growth and industrialization be modified to favor a sustained rise to higher levels of economic performance and yet avoid the fatally

simple remedy of an authoritarian regime that would use the population as cannon-fodder in the fight for

economic achievement?"

Conceptualization

Page 18: Inequality & Growth

Historical Trajectory of Income Inequality

Bourguignon and Morrisson (2002)

► 1820 to 1950: World Gini coefficient rose by 1 percentage point for every decade

► Since 1950: World income distribution continued to worsen (only improving from 1950 to 1960 and showing signs of stability between 1970 and 1992)

► Early 19th century: within-country inequality represented 80% and more of the total (it accounted for only around 40% by 1950)

► 1820 to 1950: extreme poverty rates decreased from 84% to 24%, poverty rates declined from 90% to 51.3%

Conceptualization

Page 19: Inequality & Growth

► Differences in country economic growth rates practically explain all of the increase in world inequality and in the number of poor people.

→ Richer countries become even richer as poor countries are virtually cut off from economic growth in the first 150 years after the industrial revolution.

Conclusion: Income inequality worsened dramatically in the observed period (Gini index by 30%, Theil index by 60%) due to the increase in inequality across countries or World regions.

Conclusion: Income inequality worsened dramatically in the observed period (Gini index by 30%, Theil index by 60%) due to the increase in inequality across countries or World regions.

Source: Bourguignon and Morrisson 2002, p. 741.

ConceptualizationHistorical Trajectory of Income

Inequality

Page 20: Inequality & Growth

Inequality has a negative impact on growth...

How? Why?

Page 21: Inequality & Growth

We begin with some theoretical findings…

Credit-Market Imperfections inequality of assets and incomes puts some

constraints on the investment ability of the poor

Political Economy greater degree of inequality requires redistribution

process and distorts economic decisions

Socio-political Unrest inequality of wealth and income motivates the poor

to engage in crime, riots, and other disruptive activities

Negative Impact

Page 22: Inequality & Growth

More hypotheses…

Self-promotion once there is a gap in distribution in the society,

the rich get richer and poor get poorer

Tough on policy makers high inequality can foster macroeconomic

instability and impede efficiency-promoting

reforms that require cooperation and trust

Negative Impact

Page 23: Inequality & Growth

Moreover…

Inequality is bad for health … psychological effect more egalitarian societies enjoy better

quality of social relations homicide and violence are strongly related

to income inequality leads to lower levels of social support,

weaker social networks and more domestic conflicts

Negative Impact

Page 24: Inequality & Growth

Empirical evidence…

Cramer (2003) inequality promotes conflicts

Kawachi (2009) the greater the dispersion of income within a

given society, the lower the life expectancy

Some 20 papers report that inequality leads to

higher mortality, and 2 report the opposite

(both of them use the same data)

Negative Impact

Page 25: Inequality & Growth

More evidence…

Ezcurra (2007) examines the regional growth of EU and concludes

that it is bad for growth does not depend on the specific measure used

to quantify the degree of income dispersion!

Ravallion (2001) inequality is bad for start-ups of new business, even

though the size of this effect is small

Ravallion (2005) countries with higher initial inequality experienced

lower rates of growth

Negative Impact

Page 26: Inequality & Growth

Inequality has a positive impact on growth...

How? Why?

Page 27: Inequality & Growth

Propensity to Save/Stimulates Savings Classical approach: inequality is beneficial

to development in the post-industrialization period (Keynes, 1920 & Kaldor, 1957)

The marginal propensity to save of the rich is higher than that of the poor (Kaldor) Stiglitz (1969): aggregate behaviour is

independent of the distribution of wealth Bourguignon (1981): more unequal

economies grow faster

Positive Impact

Page 28: Inequality & Growth

Propensity to Invest/Stimulates Investment

Inequality enhances growth due to Investment Indivisibilities (Aghion, Caroli & García-Peñalosa, 1999)

A rise in inequality tends to raise investment Barro (2000)

Positive Impact

Page 29: Inequality & Growth

Incentives

Trade-off between productive efficiency and equality is based on incentive considerations (Aghion, Caroli & García-Peñalosa, 1999)

Mirrlees (1971) – incentives boost effort

Okun (1975) – wealth transfer policies reduce incentives

Cornia and Court (2001) – inequality of earnings that rewards effort is likely to be pro-growth

Positive Impact

Page 30: Inequality & Growth

Empirical Evidence

Forbes, 2000 – an increase in a country’s level of income inequality has a significant positive relationship with subsequent economic growth.

Li and Zou, 1998 – income inequality is positively, and most of the time significantly, associated with economic growth.

Cornia and Court (2001) – there is an inequality range that is most efficient for growth.

Positive Impact

Page 31: Inequality & Growth

The Efficient Inequality Range

Positive Impact

Page 32: Inequality & Growth

Conclusion

Is inequality a catalyst for growth?

What is government’s role, if any, in the reduction of inequality?

Thank you for your time and attention!

Page 33: Inequality & Growth

Bibliography

Barro, Robert J. (2008) “Inequality and Growth Revisited”, Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 11 (January).

Barro, Robert J. (2000) “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 5 – 32.

Barro, Robert J. and Jong-Wha Lee. (2010) “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950 – 2010”, NBER Working Paper, No. 15902 (April).

Becker, G., Philipson, T., Soares, R. (2003) “The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality”, NBER Working Paper, No. 9765 (June).

Bello, Walden. (2006) “The capitalist conjuncture: over-accumulation, financial crises, and the retreat from globalisation”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1345 – 1367.

Bordon, R. B.; M. Bertram and T. E. Graedel. (2005) “Metal Stocks and Sustainability”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 5 (31 January), pp. 1209 – 1214.

Bourguignon, Francois. (1992) “The distributional effects of growth: case studies vs. cross-country regressions”, Delta and World Bank: Paris.

Bourguignon, Francois. (1981) "Pareto-Superiority of Unegalitarian Equilibrian Stiglitz' Model of Wealth Distribution with Convex Savings Function," Econometrica. Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 1469 - 1475.

Page 34: Inequality & Growth

Bibliography

Bourguignon, Francois and Christian Morrisson. (2006) “Inequality Among World Citizens: 1820 – 1992”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 4 (September), pp. 727 – 744.

Chen, S., Ravallion, M. (2001) “How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?”, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 47, No. 3 (September).

Cornia, Giovanni Andrea and Court, Julius (2001) “Inequality, Growth and Poverty in the Era of Liberalization and Globalization”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 63, No. 32.

Cramer, C. (2003) “Does Inequality Cause Conflict?”, Department of Development Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire. (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 565 – 591.

Forbes, Kristin J. (2000) “A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 40, No. 15.

Kawachi, I. (1997) “Social Capital, Income Inequality, and Mortality”, American Journal of Public Health.

Kuznets, S. (1955) “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 1 (March), pp. 1 – 28.

Li, Hongyi, and Heng-Fu Zou. (1998) “Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence” Review of Development Economics, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 318 – 333.

Page 35: Inequality & Growth

Bibliography

Milanovic, Branko. (2007) “Where in the world are you? Assessing the importance of circumstance and effort in a world of different mean country incomes and

(almost) no migration”, Development Research Group, World Bank. Mukhopadhaya, Pundarik. (2004) “World Income Inequality data base (WIID) Review”,

Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 2, pp. 229 – 234. Okun, Arthur M. (1975) “Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff”, Washington, D.C. Philippe Aghion; Eve Caroli; Cecilia García-Peñalosa (1999) “Inequality and Economic

Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 4. (December), pp. 1615 – 1660.

Ravaillon, M. (2005) “A poverty-inequality trade off?”, Development Research Group, World Bank.

Ravaillon, M. (2005) “Inequality is Bad for the Poor”, Development Research Group, World Bank.

Stark, Oded and J. Edward Taylor (1991) “Migration Incentives, Migration Types: The Role of Relative Deprivation, The Economic Journal, Vol. 101, No. 408 (September), pp. 1163 – 1178.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1969) "The Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals”, Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 382 – 397.

Page 36: Inequality & Growth

Bibliography

Vanhoudt, P. (1998) “An Assessment of the Macroeconomic Determinants of Inequality”, Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 271 (October).

Wilkinson, R. (1998) “Why inequality is bad for you?” Marxism Today (November/December).