© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 1 Professional Services Overview Apr 2011 Gaurav Rai Director, Professional Services
Nov 13, 2014
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 1
Professional ServicesOverview
Apr 2011Gaurav RaiDirector, Professional Services
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 2
Professional Services team at HyperQualityTM facilitates enterprise-wide deployment of Process Improvement initiatives using various quality frameworks. The team consists of highly qualified professionals including ASQ black belts, ASQ
CMQ/OE and certified PMPs
O u r M e t h o d o l o g i e s
O u r M e t h o d o l o g i e s
O u r P r o d u c t sO u r P r o d u c t s
About Professional Services
Customer Experience
Management
• Multivariate data analysis to identify the key drivers of CSAT
• Identify QA form attributes corresponding to key drivers
Contact Center Performance Improvement
• AHT Reduction• Sales Advancement• Retention Advancement• Process Standardization
Benchmarking
• Analysis of Key-Drivers affecting ROI
• Performance Comparison to best-in-class attributes already identified
Process MRI
• Periodic Detailed Vendor / Site Performance Analysis
• Identify Low hanging fruit to score quick wins
About Professional Services
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 3
Analysts – PSGreen Belts
Asst. Manager – PSCSSBB – ASQ (Trained), PMP
Managers – PSCSSBB – ASQ, PMP
Director – PS CSSBB – ASQ, PMP, B-Tech
Gaurav Rai
Nitin Jaitly Amanbir Singh
Shailendra
Process Engineering
Speech Analytics
HQ Professional Services Team
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 4
Oth
ers
PS Service Offerings
Customer Experience Management Services
QA Elements to capture Customer
Experience
Customer Experience Survey Design
Benchmarking
Process MRI
Development of an evaluation (QA) form through survey data and call analytics
Development of customer experience survey through design, pilot testing supported by data analytics
Understanding of client’s performance in comparison to other organizations across and within the industry
Ongoing engagement with clients to identify & work on various improvement opportunities
1
2
3
4
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 5
PS Service Offerings
Contact Center Performance Management Services
Average Handle Time (AHT) Reduction
Sales Effectiveness Improvement
Process Standardization
(BPMS)
First Contact Resolution (FCR)
Improvement
Through call and data analytics, HQ helps their client to significantly reduce their transaction / call handle duration
Through call and data analytics, HQ helps their client to significantly improve their sales effectiveness
Development of process documentation, Metrics identification and reporting through dashboards
Through call and data analytics, HQ helps their client to significantly improve their first contact resolution
1
2
3
4
Collections Improvement
Through speech analytics and six sigma framework driven approach, HQ targets significant improvement in collections
5
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 6
About PS @ HyperQuality
Products / Services Industry Type Description Impact
Customer Experience Management System
Telecom, Technology, Finance
QA form alignment to CSAT drivers
CSAT – QA scores within + 5%
Average Handle Time Reduction Retail, Travel Reduce call handle
time12% reduction in handle time
Retention Model Retail, Telecom Improve Customer retention
Statistically significant improvement
Process Standardization - QA function deployment
Insurance Setup of quality function
Streamlined process, reduced manual hours, less errors
First Call Resolution Improvement Finance Increase the first
call resolutionImprovement by One Sigma level
Sales Effectiveness Improvement Retail Increase the sales
conversion rate
Statistically significant improvement
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 7
Customer Experience Management
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 8
Customer Experience Management
CSAT Data
Existing QA Form
Key Driver Analysis
Call Analysis
• Multivariate Analysis• Interdependence Model• Dependence Model• Relative Importance
Study• Call Listening
ProcessInput
NEW QA Form
Output
Through the structured methodology, you get a QA Form that is aligned to the CSAT score
Evaluation (QA) form to capture Customer experience
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 9
Customer Experience Management
Key Drivers(Independent Variables)
Sati
sfa
cti
on
wit
h:
Attribute 1
Attribute 2
Attribute 3
Attribute 4
Attribute 5
Attribute N
Overall CSAT(Dependent Variable)
“Importance”
Multivariate Analysis
Inter -dependence
Model
Dependence Model
Relative Importance
Study
CSAT Survey Questions
Evaluation (QA) form to capture Customer experience – Key Driver Analysis
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 10
Customer Experience Management
Identified Key Drivers
Call Analysis
Call Analytics
Call Listening
Attributes for
New QA Form
Attribute x
Attribute y
Attribute z
Attribute n
Post Call Analysis, the new QA Form is aligned with the overall CSAT
Evaluation (QA) form to capture Customer experience – Call Analysis
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 11
OBJ
ECTI
VE
APPR
OAC
H
A 60 Billion dollar credit card and loan provider company wanted to know if the parameters used to measure the agent performance through the quality assurance (QA) form were really capable of sensing their customer’s overall satisfaction levels on the brand and quality of service.
• Identification of the factors which drive the overall customer experience through the HQ’s home grown tool called ‘Key Driver Analysis – KDA’• Check whether the attributes used to
measure call quality are aligned to gage the customer satisfaction as well• Analyze a sample of calls to modify the
attributes of existing quality assurance (QA) form
85%
81%
84%
86%
87% 87%
78%
79%
80%
81%
82%
83%
84%
85%
86%
87%
88%
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6
Before
After
Mean = 86.8%
Mean = 83%84% 87%
82% 84%
83% 86%
85% 87%
86%
83%
88%
85%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
Week 7
Week 8
Week 9
Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
Mean = 85.2%
Month 4 Month 5 Month 6
QA Data C-Sat Data
Case Study – QA & CSAT Alignment
RESULTSAfter the successful testing, the new QA form was then applied this to a larger sample and found to improve the overall customer experience by 2-4% in just a quarter
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 12
Contact Center Management System
1. Process Standardization (BPMS)
2. Sales Effectiveness Improvement
3. Handle Time (AHT) Reduction
4. First Contact Resolution (FCR Improvement
5. Collections Improvement
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 13
Process Standardization (BPMS)
The BPMS project would follow a phased approach, hence it has broken down into various phases
During the workshop, HQ team would identify (in discussion with the client) all the processes, falling under the purview of BPMS project, in the form of Process Architecture
Process Discovery Workshop
Client to pick 3-5 processes on which the rest of the project phases would be executed
Process Mapping
Nomination ofBusiness
Processes
Process Risk
Identification
KPI Identificatio
n
Performance
Dashboards
1
2
3 4 5 6
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 14
Process Standardization (BPMS)
Process Discovery Workshop, Process Architecture
Mapping of AS-IS Processes
Process Risk Identification (Using FMEA tool)
Mapping of TO-BE Processes
Key Performance Indicator / Metric Identification
Performance Reporting / Publish Dashboards
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 15
Sales Effectiveness Improvement
DEFINEDefinition of Need to Improve Sales Effectiveness
Validate Sales Performance Measurement
Determine Key Factors Impacting Sales
Recommendations to Improve Sales Performance
Report Controlled Improvement
MEASURE
ANALYZE
IMPROVE
CONTROL
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 16
Sales Model Summary
How effective is my Sales
Process?
How much improvement
do I want?
Map the Sales Processes at High Level
Definition of Need to Improve
Sales Effectiveness
Validate Sales Performance Measurement
Determine Key Factors
Impacting Sales
Recommendations to Improve
Sales Performance
Report Controlled Improvement
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONROL
How are my Sales
Performance being
measured?
Confirm / Validate the usability of
available data
Create the data collection plan, if available data
is not usable
Factors potentially
impacting Sales performance
Capture Data: Existing Data + Call Listening
Key Driver Analysis:• Rebuttal Analysis• Agent Behavior
Analysis• Script Analysis• Hypothesis
Testing
Recommended Actions to address
Key Factors affecting the Sales
Execute Pilot on the finalized
Recommendations
Measure the revised Sales Effectiveness
(Pilot Performance)
Control Charts to show consistent improvement in
Sales Performance
Handover of Project
Documentation
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 17
Average Handle Time Reduction
Identify Top Contributors to AHT
Detailed Process Mapping
Best Process Identification
Value Stream Analysis
Implement New Process Map Action Plan
Identify Top Contributors to AHT
Detailed Process Mapping
Detailed Process Mapping
Best Process Identification
Value Stream Analysis
Value Stream Analysis
Implement New Process Map
Implement New Process Map Action PlanAction Plan
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 18
FCR (First Contact Resolution) Improvement
Factor 1
Factor 2
Factor N
.
.
List of Top reasons
Through brainstorming with the vendors and control impact
analysis Data analytics to validate the
reasons
Translate the improvement on the validated reasons to increase the First Call
Resolution
Third levelFirst level
• Comparative analysis through statistical tests to get the significant factors
• Variation analysis – within and across
Second level
Factors identification exercise using “Fish Bone Diagram”
Prioritization of factors using FMEA (Failure Modes and Effect Analysis)
Understand and Standardize FCR calculation methodology across all Business Units
Calculation of FCR at Issue Type level for each Business Unit
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 19
1234..N
1234..N
Calls
Ou
tbou
nd
(D
iale
r)In
bou
nd
Connected to correct
agentCall transferred to correct agent
Not connected to customer
Connected to customer
• Full Payment
• Installment
• Settlement
• Financial Profile
• Holding Paymentor (No payment / Dispute)
Payment Ladder
Promise to Pay
No Paymen
t
Promise Kept
Promise NOT kept
Promise to Pay
1
2
34
HQ focuses 4 major improvement areas
Collections Improvement Model
© 2011, HyperQuality Inc. Confidential 20
1
2
3, 4
HQ targets the improvement of ‘Contact Rate’ (based on time of day, risk assignment, penetration rate of calling list, agent resource availability etc.) by analyzing the lists and providing suggestions
HQ executes the call analytics to understand the major drivers for call (inbound) transfers and helps maximizing the contacts with the right customer service representativesHQ applies the call evaluation and speech analytics to ensure the thorough coverage of calls (both outbound and inbound) to understand the agent behaviors to maximize:• Conversion of settlements / no payments to full payments• Ensuring high hit ration of ‘promise to pay’• Taps the trends of promised against forecasted collection through data
analytics
Through monitoring that is custom tailored to the business need, HQ helps in identification of key strengths and areas of opportunities for the customer service agents leading to better understanding of agent skill sets in order to maintain a balance of the inbound calls and outbound collections callingHQ also helps improving the call routing based on Criteria to handle the calls (e.g. types of calls, levels of delinquency, debtor risk score, debtor contact record etc.) to give priority to calls
Additional Improvements
HQ Solution
Collections Improvement – Solution