Top Banner
Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law
12

Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Randolph Dennis
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law

Page 2: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

The State of Nature (SON): a state of affairs in The State of Nature (SON): a state of affairs in

which man is at his most natural.which man is at his most natural.

Pros

No laws

Unlimited Freedom

Everyone is happy to do whatever they wish.

Cons

No laws

Unlimited freedom

Safety an issue

Personal possessions almost impossible

Kill or be killed

Page 3: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• In the SON, it is best to try and sell out anyone before they can sell you out is often expressed as theoretical game called the prisoner’s dilemma.

• Let’s say there are two prisoners who were accomplices in a crime and they’ve made a pact to stay silent and not rat out the other person. They’re being interrogated separately by the police so neither knows what the other person is going to do.

The Prisoner’s Dilemma

Page 4: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• If he rats out his friend and his friend stays silent, he’ll go free and his friend will do 10 years (and vice-versa).

• If both stay silent, they’ll each do six months.

• If both rat out the other one, they’ll each do two years.

• So if his partner stays silent, his best option is to rat him out. If his partner betrays him, his best option is again to rat him out. Either way, his best (and rational) move is to betray his partner.

Page 5: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

Thomas HobbesThomas Hobbes• Wrote Leviathan

• Seeing the violence and behavior of people gave him a dim view of human nature.

The State of Nature is “war of every man against every man.”• In the SON, people have the inclination to fight and to

take preemptive action against others. • It is in your interests not to keep contracts or

promises • There is no police or law in the SON, so nobody is

there to keep you honest.• In other words, every human MUST look out for #1 and

not worry about others or make agreements with others.

Page 6: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• In the SON, nobody will ever keep their agreements because it’s in their best interests not to do so.

• In the SON, everyone also has the right of nature, which means that you may do whatever you see fit to protect your interests, especially your life.

• Everyone is also roughly equal. Sure there are bigger guys, but they have to sleep sometime. So everyone’s equal in the sense that anyone can kill anyone else.

Page 7: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• A sovereign is the answer--somebody who will enforce contracts and punish wrongdoers.

• You must form a social contract with others around you in which everyone agrees to give up their rights of nature to someone.

• This sovereign, in this case an Absolute Monarch, will exercise violence on your behalf should you be wronged. He will create laws and enforce contracts.

• This is the only way to end the chaos

Hobbes’ AnswerHobbes’ Answer

Page 8: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

John LockeJohn Locke• For Locke, the SON isn’t the nasty place it is for Hobbes.

• In the SON, all people have perfect freedom to do what they want, but are still bound by God-given laws of nature. Moreover, everyone is equal because God made them so.

A state of war exists when somebody is aggressive towards another’s freedom (which could be enslavement, taking property, or his life) and the victim defends himself (and he has a right to this self-defense).

Page 9: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• So people form a social contract to create a sovereign and get out of the SON. In this case they create a Representative Democracy.

• People are willing to give up greater freedom in order to have some security from aggressors.

• People form societies in order to protect their property: their life, liberty, and property.

Locke’s AnswerLocke’s Answer

Page 10: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

Jean-Jacques RousseauJean-Jacques Rousseau• “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”• He says that people create societies to gain freedom from

lawlessness, and many times those societies we create don’t give us the freedom we originally asked for.

• In other words, society has a tendency to repress some while benefiting others.

• He says the social contract must be made among all the participants. The sovereign is the popular will of the collective whole of which all individuals are a part.

• Legitimate political authority, he suggests, comes only from a social contract agreed upon by all citizens for their mutual preservation—Pure Democracy.

Page 11: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

• “that whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be compelled to do so by the whole body. This means nothing less than that he will be forced to be free; for this is the condition which, by giving each citizen to his country, secures him against all personal dependence.”

• What does this mean?

• What is the ultimate answer for the chaos for Rousseau?

Page 12: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau Social Contract vs. Natural Law.

Hobbes Locke Rousseau

Thoughts People create gov’t in exchange for law and order

People are born with natural rights, but give up some freedom to protect these rights

The only good gov’t is one formed out of free will by the people, to protect the people

Gov’t favored

Absolute Monarchy

Self-gov’tRepresentative Democracy

Self-gov’t; Direct Democracy

Quotes “In a state of nature, Life is solitary, poor, nasty brutish, and short”

“All mankind... being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.”

“Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains. “