Top Banner
K-12 EDUCATION IN SASKATCHEWAN History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way
15

History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Titus Embury
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

K-12 EDUCATION IN SASKATCHEWAN

History and Institutional Structures:

What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way

Page 2: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

DEFINING ISSUES Centralization vs Local

Control Rural vs Urban Focus Minority/Disadvantaged vs

Majority Religious vs Public

Education Professional vs Public

Accountability

Page 3: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

A BRIEF HISTORYEarly Settlement 1870-1910: Settlers established local

school districts, usually 16-25 square miles, funded primarily from local taxes.

Locally elected school board hired teacher for the one room school.

Quality of education was often poor.

Page 4: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

A BRIEF HISTORY Attempts to Centralize and

Improve Quality: Foght Commission (1919) –

proposed municipal school divisions rejected. Seen as taking control from local level.

Reid Report (1933) proposed larger school units. No action.

Committee on School Administration (1939) proposes voluntary creation of larger school units. No action.

Page 5: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

A BRIEF HISTORYThe Larger School Units Act (1944) Enacted by the newly elected CCF

provincial government. Compulsory creation of larger school

units. Improved quality of education. Deeply resented by many rural

communities as a loss of local control. No more significant change until 2004;

prior attempts at voluntary restructuring had limited success.

Page 6: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

THE RECENT HISTORYRestructuring K-12 EducationConcerns over Funding: Too much rural property tax to K-

12 Education. Rural tax revolt.

Province Restructures K-12Education Restructured school divisions –

larger, fewer (31 vs more than 120).

Fairer funding system – province. Education property tax relief.

Page 7: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

SASKATCHEWAN’S

RESTRUCTUREDSHOOL DIVISIONS

Page 8: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Increased Centralization of Control – Ministry, SSBA, STF, etc.

Decline in Local Decision Making.

Funding Control – Provincial Government. Equitable Funding – School Divisions.

Provincial Accountability Frameworks – Student Achievement, Board Spending and Policy (school closures, disadvantaged, etc).

Page 9: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

AUTHORITY STRUCTURE OF SASKATCHEWAN SCHOOLS

Provincial Government

Ministry of Education

First Nations Board of Education S.S.B.A.

Schools. School Community Council L.E.A.D.S.

F.S.I.N. Director of Education S.T.F.

Superintendents Unions

Principals

Vice-Principals

Teachers

Paraprofessionals & Support Staff

Page 10: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

STRUCTURE OF K-12 EDUCATION Provincial Government: Authority for control of education is

derived from Section 93 of the B.N.A. Ministry of Education: To foster, guide and promote all

aspects of PreK-12 education in the province. Boards of Education: Elected corporate bodies, responsible

to the public, with a mandate to provide students with learning opportunities consistent with the Board’s Vision, Mission and Beliefs. Boards of Education provide the strategic direction for their school division.

School Community Councils: Facilitate parent, student & community participation in school planning. Parent, student & community members are elected. The principal is a permanent member, and another teacher is selected as a representative.

Page 11: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

STRUCTURE OF K-12 EDUCATION Director of Education: CEO of the School Division. Hired by

the Board. Oversees all aspects of the division’s operations. Superintendents: Work closely with the Director. They fill a

variety of roles and are given titles and mandates that may vary from division to division.

Principals: Responsible for the organization, administration & supervision of the school, its programs and staff, and the well-being and good order of its pupils (Sec. 175 (2) The Education Act 1995).

Vice-Principals: In large schools they often assume specific tasks (eg. Student attendance or discipline). In smaller schools they work in concert and cooperation with the principal performing whatever tasks are deemed necessary.

Page 12: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

STRUCTURE OF K-12 EDUCATION

Teachers: Section 231(1) The Education Act 1995 says teachers “are responsible for advancing the educational standards and efficiency of the school, participating in educational planning with the staff or as provided by the Board, and advancing their own professional competence.” Section 321(2) lists 17 other “Functions and Duties” ranging from teaching, planning, record-keeping, discipline, data collection, to attending staff meetings.

Paraprofessional and Support Staff: includes people such as Educational Assistants/Teacher Aides, Secretaries, Library technicians/aides, caretakers, janitors, bus drivers, and maintenance personnel. Actual titles and duties may vary from division to division.

Page 13: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

KEY STAKEHOLDERSThe Ministry of Education has the ultimate responsibility for K-12 education in the province, including – Revisions to the Act; Review of FOG; Increase distance-learning opportunities; Funding; Liaison with Boards; communities and organizations.

The SSBA represents all public & separate Boards of Education, with a mission to “be the voice of public education in Saskatchewan,” by providing “services, support and advocacy leadership to Boards.”

Page 14: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

KEY STAKEHOLDERS The League of Educational Administrators, Directors and

Superintendents: made up of “out-of-scope,” “central office”

personnel. A L.E.A.D.S. member is expected to be a:

Leader of Leaders;

Servant of Leaders;

Professional advocate;

Steward of Quality Education. The Saskatchewan Teacher’s Federation is the professional

organization of teachers in Saskatchewan. It defines its roles as

supporting and modeling leadership that embodies:

Respect in all relationships;

Service and stewardship to children and teachers;

Individual and collective empowerment;

Equity and Social Justice.

Page 15: History and Institutional Structures : What It Looks Like and How It Got That Way.

Saskatchewan Association of School Board Officials (SASBO). The members

are generally those people who coordinate the financial business of school

divisions. Their mandate is, “to assist members towards the efficient

administration of school board management and to maintain the highest

standards of professionalism, skill and knowledge among all school board

officials.”

Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN). Represents the interests of

the First Nations community at the provincial level. This

includes schools and their students. The role of First Nations

schools and the FSIN voice in educational matters will grow

in significance.

KEY STAKEHOLDERS