Top Banner
Prepared by: Ashraf Qussous 3 rd year resident
96

High angle -low angle cases

Jan 21, 2018

Download

Health & Medicine

lubna_aborob
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: High angle -low angle cases

Prepared by:

Ashraf Qussous3rd year resident

Page 2: High angle -low angle cases
Page 3: High angle -low angle cases
Page 4: High angle -low angle cases
Page 5: High angle -low angle cases

Bjork 7 Structural Guideline

Page 6: High angle -low angle cases
Page 7: High angle -low angle cases
Page 8: High angle -low angle cases
Page 9: High angle -low angle cases
Page 10: High angle -low angle cases

overbite depth indicator (ODI)

Is the angle the A-B plane makes with the mandibularplane combined with the angle of the palatal plane to the Frankfort horizontal.

PP-FH is positive it is added this value from AB-MP and vice versa.

A value of less than 68º is said to indicate an open bite tendency

Page 11: High angle -low angle cases
Page 12: High angle -low angle cases
Page 13: High angle -low angle cases
Page 14: High angle -low angle cases

Features of anterior open bite angle and/or long face syndrome

Skeletal feature

Tapered facial type. Long lower third of the face, Long maxilla Short mandible Short ramus Class II skeletal relationship Intraoral features Open bite Class 2 tendency Increased overjet Narrow upper arch Crowded LLS Growth feature Usually posterior growth rotation

Page 15: High angle -low angle cases

Features of anterior open bite angle and/or long face syndrome

Cephalometric feature

Enlarged adenoid seeing in the ceph.

Increased dentoalveolar height in molar region and reduced dentoalveolar height in incisor region due to weak muscle allowing molar eruption. (Neilsen, 1991)

Bjork’s seven features of posterior growth rotation.

Jarabak ratio: 58 high angle case, reduced OB.

UAFH-LAFH ratio: less than 65%.

The overbite depth indicator (ODI) less than 68 degree.

Page 16: High angle -low angle cases

Cephalometric feature

SN/MP angle 40º or greater

OP/MP angle 22º or greater

MxP/MnP angle 32º or greater

AOB negative overbite

PFH/AFH (Jarabak ratio) 58% or less

UFH/LFH 0.65 or less

Overbite depth indicator (ODI) 68

Page 17: High angle -low angle cases

Features of anterior open bite angle and/or long face syndrome

Soft tissue features

Long lower third of the face.

Narrow nose.

Narrow alar bases.

Decreased naso-labial angle.

Incompetent lip.

Excessive exposure of maxillary anterior teeth and gingiva at rest and smiling which is due to dentoalveolar compensation of the anterior part of the maxilla to compensate for AOB.

Retruded chin.

Page 18: High angle -low angle cases

Features of anterior open bite angle and/or long face syndrome

Intraoral features

Anterior Open bite. Class 2 tendency. Increased overjet. Narrow upper arch. Crowded LLS.

Growth feature Usually posterior growth rotation.

Page 19: High angle -low angle cases

Etiology

Skeletal factors

Genetic Environmental

Juvenile rheumatoid

arthritis Trauma to TMJ Hormonal

Soft Tissue factor

Muscle of mastication

Neurological disturbances

Chronic nasal obstruction

Adenoids

Habit

Digit Sucking Habits.

Endogenous (primary) thrust

Eg. Downs-Syndrome

Page 20: High angle -low angle cases

Treatment Stop the habit.

Myofunctional Therapy.

Myofunctional+EOA combination Therapy.

Extraoral Traction.

Fixed Appliances.

Molar intrusion using skeletal anchorage.

Repelling magnets.

Orthognathic Surgery.

Page 21: High angle -low angle cases

Treatment of digit-sucking habits, BOS guidelines 2000

The child must want to stop.

A child who is undergoing severe psychological trauma is unlikely to respond to habit breaking.

The following methods for breaking the habit are listed in the order in which they should be used:

Page 22: High angle -low angle cases

Treatment of digit-sucking habits, BOS guidelines 2000

A. Non-physical methodsI. Explanation.II. Reward.III. Habit reversal.IV. Teach the child to carry out alternative activities when they have the urge to suck the

digit.

A. Physical methods Reminder therapy like finger bandage, finger paint or thermoplastic finger post

A. Intra-oral appliancesI. Have been shown to be effective within 10 months.II. They must be fitted with the full understanding and co-operation of the child and

must not compromise compliance with any future orthodontic treatment.III. Fixed appliance like palatal appliance with crib.IV. Removable appliance.V. Functional appliance can stop habit .

Page 23: High angle -low angle cases

Habit Breakers Appliances

1. Vertical Crib

Restrain the tongue from excessive anterior movement or thumb sucking.

A .040” support arch wire is soldered to bands on the first molars.

A vertical Cage is extended just behind the lower anteriors.

Page 24: High angle -low angle cases

Habit Breakers Appliances

2. Flat Crib

For Thumb Sucking.

Wires are placed across the palate parallel to the occlusal plane to prevent the thumb from contacting the rugae.

This appliance is also less noticeable than a vertical Habit appliance.

Page 25: High angle -low angle cases

Habit Breakers Appliances3. Rake

For patients that seem to get around all the other designs.

Vertical rake is extended just behind the lower anteriors.

Page 26: High angle -low angle cases

Habit Breakers Appliances

4. Pearl

Restrain the tongue from excessive anterior movement.

A vertical cage is extended just behind the lower anteriorsto prevent the patient from tongue thrust.

A pearl is added in the vault of the palate to retrain the tongue.

Page 27: High angle -low angle cases

Myotherapy

It aims to alter resting tongue and lip posture.

a. Exercise.

b. Appliances.

Page 28: High angle -low angle cases

MYOTHERAPY Exercises1. Ask the patient to hold a piece of paper between the

lips. 2. The patient is instructed to practice correct swallowing

pattern by placing the tip of tongue on the palate, close teeth, close lips and swallow with tongue in that position. After the new swallowing pattern learned on the conscious level, it is necessary to reinforce in subconsciously. Flat, sugarless fruit drops are used to reinforce subconsciously by asking the patient to hold fruit drops against the palate.

3. Ask the patient to squeeze teeth together as hard as possible for 15 secs, relax and repeat three times for total of one minute. This exercise should be done five times a day (Clenching exercises).

Page 29: High angle -low angle cases

Myotherapy appliances1. Spring-loaded bite block, the spring-loaded bite block has helical springs

that are placed both lingually and buccally between the first premolar region and the last molar region. The ends of the springs are embedded occlusallyin the molar regions of the acrylic part of the device. The upper and lower acrylic occlusal blocks are connected by palatal and lingual wires, which are activated to a force of 450 g bilaterally. Patients are instructed to use the appliance for an average of 16 h daily

2. Passive posterior bite-blocks, are functional appliances that are used to open the bite 3–4 mm beyond the rest position. In growing patients, this inhibits the increase in height of the buccal dentoalveolar processes, thus preventing a downwards and backwards rotation of the mandible. It also allows differential eruption to occur as the labial segments can erupt unhindered, hence closing the AOB.

3. The functional regulator appliance (FR IV).

4. TwinBlock with modifications.

Page 30: High angle -low angle cases

Frankel FR- IV It establishes the mandible forward rotation with

posterior edges of buccal shields as rotational centers.

Anteriorly: the force of anterior vertical muscle chain being strengthened by lip seal exercise raises the mandible.

Page 31: High angle -low angle cases

FR -IV

Page 32: High angle -low angle cases

FR-IV OWEN s modification of a function regulator differs

from other Frankel appliances by:

a. Addition of posterior acrylic bite blocks to arrest molar eruption.

b. Has headgear tubes that accept a facebow for an occipital pull headgear, which provides the appliance with positive control of the posterior maxilla.

Page 33: High angle -low angle cases
Page 34: High angle -low angle cases

Frankel IV

Page 35: High angle -low angle cases

Frankel IV Cochrane review, by Oliveira, in 2007showed that

there is weak evidence that the interventions FR-4 with lip-seal training and palatal crib associated with high-pull chin cup are able to correct anterior open bite.

Page 36: High angle -low angle cases

Twin blocks with modifications

1. Thick Twin block appliance: The ramps measure 5 mm to 8 mm in thickness in the premolar region. Twin block with headgear to upper 1st molar.

2. Vertical elastics to upper and lower posterior premolar regions.

3. Repelling rare earth magnets in the occlusal bite blocks

Page 37: High angle -low angle cases

Twin-Block with posterior bite blocks :

Bite anterioposteriorly is irelevent to the deep bite correction

Bite is be opened above the normal resting vertical dimention.

Blocks on molars prevent their eruption, and the opening of the bite stretch the muscles.

Page 38: High angle -low angle cases

Extraoral Traction

1. Vertical pull chin-cup

2. High-pull headgear applied to the maxillary molar teeth worn for 14 hours per day has been used to inhibit eruption of the posterior teeth and hence limit vertical growth

High pull headgear to a maxillary splint.

High pull headgear to buccal splint.

Headgear can be applied directly to the upper molar bands of a fixed appliance

Page 39: High angle -low angle cases
Page 40: High angle -low angle cases

Fixed Appliances

1. Extraction of terminal molars

2. Bracket set up (more gingival at anterior teeth, reduced canine tipping)

3. Wire bending to allow incisor extrusion

4. Tongue timer which act as a tongue thrust breaker

5. Vertical intermaxillary elastics to extrude the anterior teeth. Should not be used if the etiology is primarily skeletal.

6. Segmental arch mechanics to extrude the incisor similar to Rickets mechanics.

7. Kim mechanics & Modified Kim mechanics.

Page 41: High angle -low angle cases

Kim mechanics

Increased curve of Spee in the maxillary arch and a reverse curve of Spee in the mandibular arch combined with anterior elastics.

Size of anterior elastic is 3/16 heavy

Force is 50g when closing

150g when opening.

Page 42: High angle -low angle cases

Molar intrusion using skeletal anchorage

LikeDental implants, mini-plates, mini-screws ,ankylosed teeth (Cousely 2008 use TPA with two palatal TAD for posterior teeth intrusion, while Etilitaet al 2012 use TPA with two buccal TAD). Park et al (2008).

Intrusion of the molars is best suited to skeletal open bite patients who show long face types with class 1 or mild class 2 skeletal patterns whereas in class 3 open bites, the class 3 malocclusion would get worse as the anterior open bite closed

Page 43: High angle -low angle cases

Patients who do not show sufficient incisor exposure should not be treated by molar intrusion, making the more conventional method of incisor extrusion a more suitable option for open bite correction

This can be achieved by

placing miniscrews on both the buccal and palatal,

using a transpalatal bar or a splint

An alternative design of splint

Page 44: High angle -low angle cases

Mid Palatal Implant

Page 45: High angle -low angle cases
Page 46: High angle -low angle cases
Page 47: High angle -low angle cases
Page 48: High angle -low angle cases

Disadvantages of buccal implants1. The inter-radicular space between the first molar

and the second molar is very small.

2. In open bite cases, as the posterior teeth being intruded, the screw becomes closer to the alveolar crest and the periodontal membrane.

Page 49: High angle -low angle cases

Disadvantages of buccal implants In most of cases, the inter-radicular space between 6

and 7 is narrow.

Then, it is inevitable to place a mini-implant between 5 and 6.

The mechanical efficiency to intrude the posterior teeth will be decreased & Possibility of Root trauma is high.

Page 50: High angle -low angle cases

Orthognathic Surgery

Where there is an obvious step in the occlusal plane, two piece maxilla.

No step, one piece maxilla.

Subapical osteotomy of the anterior (Kole technique) or posterior segment (Schuchart technique) depend on the etiology.

Recently Bisase 2009 recommend anticlockwise rotation of BSSO with rigid fixtion.

Page 51: High angle -low angle cases

Stability of AOB

In general: AOBs treatment is stable in approximately 80% of treated cases with slightly better with surgical treatment than non-surgical (5% differences).(Huang, 2002)

Extraction: There is also evidence of greater stability of open bite correction when orthodontic treatment is undertaken with extractions (Janson et al., 2006)

Extrusionorintrusion: In treatment resulting in molars intrusion, the rate of relapse ranges from 17 to 30%: whilst in treatments with incisor extrusion, relapse may be even greater, reaching sometimes 40% of treated cases. (Suguwara 2011)

Page 52: High angle -low angle cases

Causes of relapse

a. Continued unfavorable posterior mandibular growth rotation

b. Unfavorable tongue position

c. Continued habit

d. Excessive extrusion of incisors

e. Relapse after surgery

Page 53: High angle -low angle cases

Management of relapse

1. Overcorrection

2. Using High-Pull headgear attached to a URA

3. Retainer with passive bite blocks, which supposedly place intrusive forces on the posterior teeth, could be used & should be continued until facial growth has almost ceased and this is often well into late teens.

4. Some recommend lip and tongue muscle exercises.

Page 54: High angle -low angle cases

Skeletal class 2 with Long Face

Can be treated successfully by the intrusion of the posterior teeth as this would produce a closing counterclockwise rotation of the mandible with a shortening of the anterior facial height and a correction of the open bite, in addition to the reduction of OJ.

In grower with High-Pull Headgear.

In non-grower By TADs

Page 55: High angle -low angle cases

Case report of class 2 high-angle in 12 year old patient

Page 56: High angle -low angle cases
Page 57: High angle -low angle cases
Page 58: High angle -low angle cases
Page 59: High angle -low angle cases

Classification of deep bite

Classification

Developmental deep bite

Skeletal deep bite

(horizontal growth pattern)

Dento-alveolar deep bite

Inter occlusal clearance

(functionally a pseudo deep over bite)

supra occluded incisors

Acquired Deep Bite

Lateral Tongue Thrust , Infra Occluded

Posterior Teeth e.g. class II div 2

Early loss of Deciduous Teeth, Tipped

Contiguous Teeth (Acquired Secondary

Deep Over Bite)

Wearing of OcclusalSurface or Tooth

abrasion

Page 60: High angle -low angle cases

Dento-aleveolar

Skeletal

Page 61: High angle -low angle cases

Features of low angle or short face syndrome

Skeletal features:

a. Short lower third of the face.

b. Class II skeletal relationship.

c. Long maxilla.

d. Short mandible.

e. Broad square facial type.

Page 62: High angle -low angle cases

Features of low angle or short face syndrome

Soft tissue features:

a. Increased exposure of maxillary anterior teeth and gingiva at rest and smiling.

b. Competent lip.c. Acute LMA & NLA.d. High lower lip line.e. Hyperactive mentalis. f. Hypertrophied masseter.g. Prominent chin.

Page 63: High angle -low angle cases

Features of low angle or short face syndrome

Intraoral features:

a. Deep bite.b. Class 2 Dev2 tendency. c. Reduced overjet.d. Wide upper arch.e. Lower incisor trapping behind upper incisors.

Growth feature: Usually anterior growth rotation.

Page 64: High angle -low angle cases

Cephalometric featurea. UAFH-LAFH ratio: less than 0.65 are considered to

be poor risks for conventional orthodontic treatment alone.

b. Bjork’s seven features of posterior growth rotation.

c. Jarabak ratio:

PFH:AFH, 59 – 63% is normal; if > 64 low angle case then the case is deep OB; if < 58 then the case is high angle case, reduced OB.

Page 65: High angle -low angle cases

Aetiology deep

overbite

Skeletal Factors

Soft TissuesDental factors

Growth Factors

Page 66: High angle -low angle cases

Skeletal Factors1. Antero-posterior problem:

Class II skeletal pattern with loss of occlusal contact allowing the incisors to overeupt or the mandible to rotate anteriorly.

2. Vertical problem:

A reduced lower face height in conjunction with a class II jaw relationship often results in the absence of an occlusal stop to the lower incisors, which then continue to erupt leading to an increased overbite which exaggerated by anterior growth rotation of the mandible.

Page 67: High angle -low angle cases

Growth Factors

In forward growth rotation and loss of incisor stop an increased overbite will become worse unless the incisors have an occlusal stop.

Page 68: High angle -low angle cases

Soft Tissues

a. High lower lip line: The higher the lower lip line, the more retroclined the upper incisors and the deeper the overbite.

b. Hyperactive or “strap- like” lower lip.

c. Hyperactive Mentalis muscle: causing retroclination of the upper incisors and then increase in the OB.

d. Hyperactive Masseter muscle.

Page 69: High angle -low angle cases

Dental factors.

Diminution of palatal surface (cingulum) of the upper incisor crowns.

Increased Incisors height.

Page 70: High angle -low angle cases

Iatrogenic Factor

In the case of treating Class II division 1 and instead of finishing the case into Class I, it is finished into Class II division 2 causing deep incisor overbite.

Page 71: High angle -low angle cases

Management of Low Angle cases

Page 72: High angle -low angle cases

Treatment modalities in growing and non growing patients.

1. Growing patients:

a. Intrude anteriors.

b. Extrude posteriors.

c. Combination of posterior eruption and anterior intrusion.

2. Non growing patients (little or no growth expected):

a. Orthognathic surgery.

b. Intrusion of anteriors (posterior extrusion invariably relapses).

Page 73: High angle -low angle cases

Soft Tissue consideration

Page 74: High angle -low angle cases

Depending on Inter occlusal space

Page 75: High angle -low angle cases

Dental and Skeletal consideration

Page 76: High angle -low angle cases

Considering Growth pattern

Page 77: High angle -low angle cases

Mechanics for overbite reduction

Page 78: High angle -low angle cases

Mechanics for overbite

reduction

Extraoral traction Dahl appliancesRemovable Appliances

Fixed appliance

Bracket settingIntermaxillary

mechanics Fixed anterior

bite planes.Archwires:

Rocking chair NiTi arch wires

Segmented Burstone Arch

Wires mechanics

Rickett’s utility arch

Absolute Anchorage

OrthognathicSurgery

Page 79: High angle -low angle cases

Removable AppliancesAnterior Bite Plane

Indications:

a. Growing patient.

b. With a short lower facial height.

c. Excessive curve of Spee.

d. Other uses include protection of the lower incisor brackets from being debonded.

Page 80: High angle -low angle cases

Extraoral traction

1. J hooks: (Linge and Linge 1983 show that J hook cause root resorption). Degushi 2008 compared TAD with J hook for intrusion and found the result is 3.1 and 1.3mm respectively.

2. Cervical pull HG to molars

Page 81: High angle -low angle cases

Functional Appliances

The modes of action in reducing the OB are:

a. By allowing the posterior teeth to erupt either during the active functional appliance through relieving of the acrylic from the lower part of the TB or during transient period through the use of steep and deep URA.

b. Through changing the direction of growth pattern

c. By some proclination of the lower labial segment may occur

Page 82: High angle -low angle cases

Fixed appliance setting

1. Increase mesial angulation of the upper canines.

2. Bracket Positioning

3. No laceback or cinch back

4. Banding second permanent molar. This means:

Additional vertical posterior anchorage

Molar therefore a more effective wedge in extrusion is more distal and the occlusion.

Page 83: High angle -low angle cases

Rocking chair NiTi archwire

It acts by intrusion of anterior teeth.

Extrusion of posterior teeth.

Proclination of anterior teeth.

It can be used to treat AOB with Kim mechanics.

Earlier engagement of brackets with a rectangular wire is possible, which may speed overbite reduction.

long range of action

Page 84: High angle -low angle cases

Disadvantages of Rocking chair NiTiarch wires

Molar rotation distobuccally.

Molar rolling buccally.

Premolar expansion.

Incisor proclination.

Asymmetric bite opening sometimes occurs.

Contraindicated in extraction cases(difficulty of space closure).

Page 85: High angle -low angle cases

Segmented Burstone Arch Wires mechanics

AW which is a segmented base arch wire (so that there is no connection along the arch between the anterior and posterior segments) and an auxiliary depressing arch.

The buccal segments are first aligned, and then stabilised using a full dimension rectangular arch wire. The same for anterior segment

In addition to this, a heavy lingual arch is used to connect the right and left posterior segments.

An auxiliary depressing arch is then placed in the auxiliary tube on the first molar and is used to apply force against the anterior segment.

It is recommended that no more than the four incisors should be incorporated in the intrusive segment, since if the canines were also included, this would shift the anchorage balance unacceptably towards distal tipping of the buccal segment teeth.

018x.025ss wire with a two and a half turn helix. .019x.025 TMA without a helix.

Page 86: High angle -low angle cases

Segmented Burstone Arch Wires mechanics

The wire should lie just gingival to the incisor teeth when passive, and applies a light force of 10-15g when activated.

The Burstone intrusion arch is tied beneath the brackets, not into the bracket slots, which are occupied by the anterior segment wire.

It still has the effect of wanting to tip the incisors forward as they intrude, but two strategies may be employed to prevent this:

The arch wire may be tied back against the posterior segment –however, this can put some strain on the posterior anchorage.

The point of force application may be altered by tying it more distally. The force is then closer to the labial segment’s centre of resistance – this prevents incisor proclination without straining posterior anchorage.

Page 87: High angle -low angle cases

Segmented Burstone Arch Wires mechanics It still has the effect of wanting to tip the incisors forward

as they intrude, but two strategies may be employed to prevent this:

a. The arch wire may be tied back against the posterior segment – however, this can put some strain on the posterior anchorage.

b. The point of force application may be altered by tying it more distally. The force is then closer to the labial segment’s centre of resistance – this prevents incisor proclination without straining posterior anchorage.

Page 88: High angle -low angle cases
Page 89: High angle -low angle cases

Rickett’s utility arch

step-down bends labial root torque to control the inclination of the teeth as the

incisors move labially while they intrude.

Indications for segemental archwires:a. Adults.b. Deep overbite with the incisors are upright and the canines

distally angulated and an intrusive force anterior to the centre of resistance of the incisors in the early stages is quite helpful.

c. Highly positioned canines with overerupted incisors.d. Gummy smile.e. Orthodontic decompensation for AOB case treated by

segemental surgery.

Page 90: High angle -low angle cases

Advantages of segemental archwires:

a. A long range of action, because of the long inter-bracket span.

b. More easily estimated biomechanical effects.

c. Frictionless.

Page 91: High angle -low angle cases

Disadvantages of segmental mechanics:

a. Complexity of fabrication.

b. Less ‘fail-safe’ effect if the case is unsupervised for a period.

c. Oralhygiene difficulties and patient discomfort if the wires impinge on the mucosa.

d. Poorercontrol of overall arch form; bypass arch systems limit the amount of true intrusion that can be obtained:

Extrusion of the first molar can occur through distal tipping of molars as it is the only tooth available as posterior anchorage – high-pull headgear may need to be used, especially in non-growing patients.

the intrusive force against the incisors is applied anterior to the centre of resistance – causes incisors to tip forwards as they intrude.

Rickett’s utility arch

Page 92: High angle -low angle cases

Functional appliances

For class 2 and reduced facial height.

Treatment of choice when having growing class 2 patient with deep bite.

Proclination of lower incisors reduces deep-bite.

They might change the direction of grwoth to downward-forward direction.

Page 93: High angle -low angle cases

Class 2 elastics Helps in lower molar extrusion.

Although can cause upper incisors to retract, the effect is much less than lower molars extrusion, since they are closer to the hing axes.

Upper rect. Steel can reduce the effect of retroclination of upper incisors.

Page 94: High angle -low angle cases

Surgery

3 point landing, followed by premolar extrusion.

Segmental surgery eg: Kole procedure.

Page 95: High angle -low angle cases

If a growing patient presented to you with:

Low angle class 2?

High angle class 2?

Low angle class 3?

High angle class 3?

Page 96: High angle -low angle cases

Stability of OverBite

1. Avoiding change in the facial height in non-growing.

2. Long term retention if LLS proclined.

3. Amount of the OB at the start.

4. Normal InterIncisal angle.

5. Normal lower incisor edge to centroid.

6. Build up diminutive cingulum plateau.

7. Vertical height growth continue in teenager so the use of URA with ant bite plane as part time use in retention.