HERE IS THE EVIDENCE, NOW SHOW US THE BALLOTS!

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE, NOW SHOW US THE BALLOTS!

ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™

APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 2

U R G E N T A C T I O N R E Q U I R E D

Here is the Evidence, Now Show Us the Ballots!

We are in the midst of what some call “the greatest political scandal in history.” According to recent polls, something like 47% of Americans believe that the 2020 election was stolen, a plurality larger than those who believe it was free and fair.And regardless of which camp you find yourself in, everyone has to face the fact that this was an extremely unusual election in many respects.

We saw massive electoral changes and challenges put in place during the Covid-19 pandemic. And we just exited a period in which one side repeatedly challenged the legitimacy of President Trump, first with claims of Russian collusion and then impeachment, and constant media attacks.

The fact is a significant portion of the American population would not view either Trump or Biden as the next legitimate President unless and until we clear up the controversy over the 2020 election. This is absolutely necessary for the proper healing of our nation. It will require courage from all parties.

Your Mission: To lead in a fair and impartial way, and to resolve all of this without further turmoil through a special analysis on the physical ballots in the six key swing states.

“We will offer a simple and elegant way to examine the 2020 election and hopefully, once and for all, find an agreed upon winner.” –Kevin Freeman

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 3

SP.1230 (OSINT) Open-Sourced Intelligence Special Report. This is a Special Election Integrity Report with Kevin Freeman.

1. Nearly half of America believes the election was stolen and that is a problem!

• There should be little wonder as to why nearly half of America believes the election was stolen.

• Even if you believe that the election was mostly fair, you have to admit that there were many unusual and suspicious things about this election.

• Denying that will only tear us further apart as a society.

“Thoughtfully looking at the irregularities and abnormalities can be a way to better understand one another and heal our nation. This is something that every fair-minded American should want.”

2. This is not a Trump vs. Biden issue. It’s not about Democrats vs. Republicans. This is about election integrity and the future of our nation.

• Joe Biden should want a clear process and so should Donald Trump.

• But to date, this has not been handled in a bi-partisan, transparent way. And that has created confusion and division.

• In this briefing, we will walk through the big issues, show evidence that has never been debunked or refuted, and then offer a simple and elegant solution that should erase the doubts and settle the matter for fair-minded individuals.

“There is good news is that you can play an important role in healing and restoring America.”

3. The Disputes and large anomalies are primarily from just six counties out of 3006 counties in all of America.

NOTE: The 2020 Presidential election was decided by six counties out of more than 3,000 counties in America.

These critical counties include the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 4

• And the voting and counting were not clear and transparent in those six counties, with multiple credible reports of irregularities and some of it being outright fraud.

Yet, the media, social media, and governments have gone out of their way to censor, suppress, or deny any issues. This has not engendered confidence. It has stoked division rather than healing it.

A look at the key issues:

A. Procedural Changes - There were all sorts of procedural changes to this election that have never been done before. These changes stripped out many of the safeguards that every expert on both sides said were necessary prior to this election. As an example, even Chris Matthews, Barack Obama and Debbie Wasserman Schultz warned about the risks of mail-in ballots unless there were safeguards like true signature verification. You can see for yourself here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ca0fT5OvE1XW/. The bi-partisan National Election Defense Coalition was formed in 2013 based on the work of former president Jimmy Carter and James Baker. Here’s what they said about mass mail-in ballots before the election:

• “As with any voting system that is not fully transparent, proving mail-in fraud can be difficult or impossible. Once we drop our ballot in the mail, we can’t verify what becomes of it. Additionally, should our ballots arrive in the central aggregating location untampered, they are likely to be counted by the same computerized counters that have been proven vulnerable to error and fraud. Central counting makes fraud on a large scale easier to accomplish and harder to detect.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 5

• Vote by mail cannot provide a secure chain of custody of the ballots. That means the ballots are moved without consistent public oversight, offering opportunities for fraud, mismanagement and disenfranchisement. Ballots are stored in hundreds of thousands of locations with insufficient security for two to three weeks. The ballots are handled by many anonymous persons throughout the process. It’s possible that an unmarked contest on a ballot can be marked by someone other than the voter when the ballots are opened for counting.”

• Let that sink in. As this program is being prepared those remarks remain on the ElectionDefense.org website and everyone knows them to be true.

• No wonder that, according to the Stanford University Daily earlier this year

(https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/04/24/the-case-against-a-vote-by-mail-election):

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 6

B. Ignoring the bi-partisan reality - Election officials are conveniently ignoring that bi-partisan reality, trying to convince you that this was ”the most secure election in history.”

• But did you know that, according to the New York Times, mail in voting accounted for nearly half of all votes across the country in this election? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/10/us/mail-voting-absentee.html)

• This is a massive increase in mail-in ballots, never before witnessed in America. Take a look at this chart using data from the US Election Assistance Commission.

• Mail-in ballots voted jumped by nearly 40 million from the last election.

• The important thing to note here is that these new mail-in ballots happened in states without a strong history of large batches of mail-in ballots.

• That means they may not have the experience or safeguards in place that the non-partisan experts say are necessary.

“Remember, even Barack Obama said that honest mail-in voting requires proper signature verification. So did Jimmy Carter in a bi-partisan commission.” –Kevin Freeman

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 7

C. Safeguards were Ignored – According to court cases, affidavits, and witnesses, the safeguards were ignored or removed, particularly in those six crucial counties.

• We have testimonies of mail-in ballots without chain of custody.

• We have reports of mail-in ballots cast that were sent to dead voters, or people who moved. Or addresses where the supposed voter didn’t even live.

• Then there’s the risk that the mail-in ballot was intercepted from the mailbox or voted by another person who lives at that address.

• No wonder the bi-partisan commission concluded that mail-in ballots ‘remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.’ Yet nearly half our ballots were cast by mail for the first time in American history.

D. Rejection rates for Mail in Ballots Dropped - Did you know that while first-time mail-in ballots increased more than ever in history, the rejection rate for such ballots fell sharply.

• You would think that with the documented risk of mail-in fraud, combined with a massive increase in first-time mail-in ballots in new areas, we would see higher, rather than lower rejection rates. But we didn’t!

CASE REVIEW:

• Given the fact that mail-in ballots overwhelmingly favored Biden, just using normal rejection rates would have given President Trump the win.

• https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/03/democrats-more-mail-in-ballots-pennsylvania-433951

• For example, according to Ballotpedia, the mail-in ballot rejection rate for Pennsylvania in the 2018 election was 4.45% but dropped to just 0.28% this year. In Georgia, the 2018 rate was 3.1% but only 0.6% this year.

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_Analysis_of_rejected_ballots

• A lower rejection rate means that more votes were counted for Biden. It’s as simple as that.

• And this is just a small part of the irregularities that we saw in the 2020 election. All of this is documented.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 8

NOTE: Because we don’t have chain of custody or the other safeguards in place, it is virtually impossible to know if the Biden margin is real or fraudulent without thoroughly and properly examining those ballots. That is essentially what the bi-partisan NEDC warned in advance of the election.

The good news is that we have a simple way to check the ballots that should be acceptable to all parties. https://rumble.com/vbvj2j-breaking-inventor-of-qr-code-can-determine-if-ballots-are-legitimate-or-fak.html

E. In some cases, the move to mass mail-in ballots was unconstitutional, driven by election officials, not the State legislatures. Sadly, the courts would rather not address it.

It is important to note that the move to mass mail-in ballots was undertaken by election officials in many states, without the explicit permission of the State legislature as the Constitution requires.

This has led to multiple constitutional challenges in court, including one docketed at the Supreme Court that could change the election outcome when heard.

CAUTION: Strangely the Supreme Court has chosen to hear the case only after the inauguration.

• Courts do not like getting involved in elections.

• One of the arguments being made that there was no fraud is based on the fact that courts have rejected every case brought by the Trump team.

“Here’s the problem with that line of reasoning: The courts have not looked at the evidence.” –Kevin Freeman

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 9

• They have rejected cases based on procedural issues such as “standing.” One court said the case was brought too soon. Another said it was brought too late. Courts do not want to get involved in political issues, especially related to elections.

• As a result, we have a constitutional crisis. The courts refuse to get involved and the unelected election officials have taken control.

• It is so bad that many of the state legislatures have convened hearings to address the problem. In Arizona, for example, the State Senate subpoenaed the election equipment and ballots, but the election officials just refused to comply.

• But that is not at all how it is supposed to be. According to the Constitution, state Legislatures are the ones responsible for appointing electors who in turn elect the President.

• Article II, Section 1, Clause 2:

Yes, the state legislatures did establish a process for their citizens to vote for President. But in disputed states, there were multiple changes to the rules that the state legislature did not approve. And some of those legislatures have joined in lawsuits to get their power back. But so far, the courts have found minor reasons to reject those suits.

• Do you see the sad irony in this? Courts are using minor technicalities to prevent the Constitutional authority granted to the legislature.

• This is especially true where courts have conspired with election officials to allow mass mail-in voting contrary to state law.

• Then, those same election officials and courts oversee any recounts or challenges to the unconstitutional rules they set up.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 10

According to the bi-partisan National Election Defense Coalition (or NEDC), none of these states were even close to prepared for the major changes:

• “Only three states, Oregon, Washington and Colorado, have developed state-wide universal access to VBM, achieved over a years-long transition and testing.

• The rest of the states would need a quantum leap of reorganization to accomplish a wholesale transition; a high bar given the virus has shut down many state and County offices and functions, and most poll workers are elderly and vulnerable to the virus.

• Infrastructure for drastic expansion is deficient, not only in funds, but in available hardware and software technologies for processing VBM at the county and precinct level, as well as in personnel training.”

• In hindsight, the NEDC was right. They provided a list of warnings of what would happen, including:

√ Ballots mailed to wrong address.

√ Unsecured drop-off boxes.

√ Ballots mailed with unusable return envelope.

√ Ballots mailed in large bundles to single mailboxes.

√ Mailed ballots left on lobby floors/insecure locations rather than individual mailboxes.

√ Not all counties extended time they received mail-in ballots.

√ Citizens listed as having voted but report never having received a ballot or casting one.

√ Campaign worker confessed to stealing ballots out of mailboxes on behalf of and “at the direction of” the campaign.

√ Many mailed ballots from outdated registration lists.

√ Ballot alignment errors rendered them uncountable by scanners with faulty software and poor calibration.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 11

We have examples of all of these things happening in 2020. And that is just the tip of the iceberg!

You would think that election officials would be quick to investigate. But they aren’t.

4. The Immaculate Deception - Dr. Peter Navarro documented a slew of problems in the six swing states in a 36-page paper he titled the Immaculate Deception. While the media has attempted to “debunk” the report in general, the truth is that on a point-by-point basis, it holds up, with facts, first-hand witness accounts, and affidavits.

From the report’s introduction:

• “All six battleground states exhibit most, or all, of six dimensions of election irregularities. However, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

• This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.

• In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth. This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and the stability of our political system and Republic.

• Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election.

Source: Heritage.org

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 12

• If this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people.

• The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches.

• …this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again.”

• Looking at one table in Dr. Navarro’s report, we see that there are at least 1.4 million disputed ballots across the six states. Yet, the combined Biden margin of victory is just 313,000. That means that the questionable ballots are 5 times larger than the number needed for a Trump victory.

The kind of things that Dr. Navarro documented match perfectly with what we were warned about mass mail-in ballots:

• He documented a failure to properly verify signatures in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

• He documented mail-in ballots lacking the proper “outer envelope,” which should have disqualified them.

• He documented a broken “chain of custody” with improper drop boxes.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 13

• He documented mail-in ballots without valid postmarks, or ballots that appear to have been backdated.

• Every one of the things he documented was warned about by the NEDC well in advance of the election. They said that mass mail-in ballots would cause these problems. Yet the rejection rate dropped.

• The Navarro Report also documents the abuse of poll watchers. The law is clear that poll watchers are necessary to assure a free and fair election. Yet we have multiple affidavits of Republican poll watchers being excluded from watching. In some cases, they have sworn under penalty of perjury that they were asked to leave or kept at such distance that they couldn’t do their job.

• Then there is the infamous example where the windows were covered up so the public couldn’t watch the counting.

While the media may claim these have been debunked, the truth is that many poll watchers in the key states have testified or provided affidavits that they were not allowed to do their job in the manner that the state legislature prescribed. This is a clear violation of the Constitution.

Step back a second from the media narrative and ask yourself a couple of questions:

• First, do you think poll watchers are important for fair counting? Your answer should be an unequivocal, “YES!”

• Now ask yourself, what happens if those poll watchers are not allowed to do their job? Does that create the potential for fraud? OF COURSE, IT DOES!

• Further evidence has emerged. In fact, there is an amazing video of pure testimonies from Georgia that document many other examples of fraud.

5. Pennsylvania’s own State Legislature is Concerned:

• Just this week, members of the Pennsylvania State Legislature performed an extensive analysis of the votes cast and the reported results in the 2020 presidential race.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 14

• They claim serious irregularities. While the debunkers will no doubt attempt to discredit their findings, here is what they said:

“A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows …(a) difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States.

On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.

We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.

However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

• This Pennsylvania challenge by legislatures just documents all of the things we’ve been talking about. And as we explained earlier, it is the LEGISLATURE that has constitutional authority to determine the election outcome.

• State legislators in each of the swing states have expressed serious concerns about everything we have discussed and even more.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 15

6. Watch out for Big Tech - Mark Zuckerberg spent almost as much as our federal government did on the election.

• There have been questions raised about the reliability of voting machines, the violations of state law in how the election was conducted, illegal ballots, foreign interference, and even the role of billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg throwing money into their state without their oversight.

• It’s been reported that Mark Zuckerberg spent $350 million, almost as much as the Federal government did, on the 2020 election. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/amistad-project-time-to-fully-unmask-mark-zuckerbergs-350-million-funnelled-for-election-administration-and-the-motivation-behind-

it-301161751.html

• Remember, the only Constitutional authority over the electors in a state is the state legislature.

• The election should not be conducted on Mark Zuckerberg’s terms. Yet, his reported $350 million hired and trained election judges, set up temporary polling locations and placed ballot drop boxes that somehow seemed to favor Biden voters. These were not authorized under the rules set by legislatures.

7. VoteDetective has uncovered numerous irregularities and questionable ballots in Georgia.

There were almost 55,000 ballots cast that appear to violate state laws.• 31,694 ballots cast from outside the county of registration. Under Georgia

law, you must reregister when you move to a new county.• 10,414 ballots appear to have been cast by people who moved out of state

and were not residents at the time of the election.• 13,050 votes were cast from vacant residences.• When you add these up, these bad ballots far exceed the margin of victory.• Why wouldn’t Georgia authorities investigate? Fortunately, VoteDetective

did and is doing the same type work in each of the swing states.• When the Georgia legislators learned these facts, they moved to decertify

their electors.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 16

8. State Legislators trying to regain their constitutional authority!

• In response, Legislators in all six states have taken one or more actions to regain their Constitutional authority.

• They have held hearings, filed lawsuits, and even sent alternative elector slates to Congress.

“So, when you hear the media and social media trying to deny irregularities, you should realize that they have an agenda. All of this explains why 47% of American voters do not fully trust the election results. And that is bad for democracy. We can’t allow the media to bully people into silence. No amount of “fact checking” or debunking can properly address the legitimate concerns people have.” –Kevin Freeman

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 17

9. It’s about understanding the Science.

• In 2012, the National Academy of Sciences published a paper on how to spot election fraud.

• They recommended using statistical analysis to see if there were outliers and irregularities. Many statisticians have done just that, and their findings all point to serious issues. We will have a section in our Battle Plan where you can find their analysis.

• Their work is science. We shouldn’t be science deniers. We need to get to the truth before we install the president.

10. Freedom of Speech threatens all our freedom.

• Here’s what’s bad for freedom: Trying to silence those who have legitimate questions and also undermining the constitutional authority given to state legislatures.

“Don’t give me this line that questioning the election is bad for democracy. The Washington Post published a piece that said denying the election results was tantamount to denying the Holocaust. That’s utter nonsense!”Don’t forget how many people claimed, falsely I might add, that Russian collusion was responsible for Trump’s 2016 win. We now know that story was floated by the Clinton campaign and amplified by the Biden intelligence community.” –Kevin Freeman

• Sadly, there will be no healing for our nation until we can properly settle what happened in the 2020 election.

11. Fortunately, there is a solution that just may bring America back together again on a free and fair election.

• We had Jovan Hutton Pulitzer in the Economic War Room several weeks ago. He is a pioneer and patent holder in scanning, barcodes, and optical technologies.

• Jovan has the technology to take a stack of ballots, scan them, and quickly determine whether they are real or fake.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 18

• The scan can tell if the paper meets Federal standards, if they were folded and mailed, and if they were marked by a human of a device. The scan can even tell where they were printed and if they match the other ballots.

• A simple scan could be conducted with the whole world watching under the authority of the state legislators. It could be done with multiple neutral observers.

• And we could resolve most of the big questions people have.

Really looking at the ballots in these six counties with a scientific approach is a chance to come together as Americans and truly legitimize this election. You would think both candidates would want that.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 19

Why You Should Care:

• Whether the final results show a Biden or Trump win, America needs a legitimate President.

• We are about to face a constitutional crisis or worse.

• Freedom of Speech is being threatened like never before.

• Free and fair elections may not exist again if we do not ensure election integrity and understand the anomalies now.

• Mail-in ballots were allowed to be cast or mishandled contrary to state law.

• Poll watchers were denied their right to observe. This is well documented and not debunked. This evidence is simply ignored.

• There are multiple issues that could account for more than the difference of this election and the results.

• Courts are afraid to address or consider the scientific evidence.

• While there are multiple examples of election fraud, there is an easy and fair way to determine legal ballots through the paper trial.

• We have made it easy for you to help make a difference and your voice be heard.

Next Steps:

1. Review the links below to see the back up evidence for yourself. We want to provide everyone the information available to make their own decisions.

2. Go to https://everylegalvote.com and read the thousands of testimonies sent in by people who feel defrauded. Millions of people have visited this website since the election with almost 6 million “actions taken.”

3. We need to petition the right people to do their jobs. Your voice matters! Use the “TAKE ACTION” link at https://everylegalvote.com. With a few mouse clicks, in less than 60 seconds you will add your voice to thousands of others:

• Demanding that the Attorney General treat all ballots and voting machines as evidence in a Federal proceeding.

• You will also be able to demand that all of the questionable ballots be properly examined by a digital forensic expert. This can be done very quickly.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 20

• And we will demand that the state legislatures regain their proper constitutional authority over the election. They have every right to examine the ballots and also require that the voting machines be forensically reviewed.

• Demand that our Senators and Representatives question the electoral vote unless and until the ballots have been properly reviewed by the legislators.

• Require that Vice President Pence exclude any questionable electoral votes until the ballots have been examined.

4. You heard about election fraud from us in the Economic War Room before. If you are new to Economic War Room, you can see more information and election fraud background at www.EconomicWarRoom.com/myvote.

5. Be sure to sign up for our free Economic Battle Plans™ at www.EconomicWarRoom.com

• If you are following Economic War Room you will be on the leading edge as it relates to global threats, geopolitical analysis, and how you can weaponize your money to strengthen America. Your money, livelihood and way of life are at risk and these tools are designed to mobilize America to protect their economic liberty.

• Learn more about Economic War Rooms financial advisor training at https://www.economicwarroom.com/advisor We will be launching this in 2021

In the Economic War Room®, we encourage Americans to be the “small ships that make the difference.” You cannot solely rely on the government or the president to solve America’s problems. You have to make a difference. It is up to you to help take our country back and create a voice for economic liberty. [The small ships are based on Churchill’s Operation Dynamo that rescued the British Expeditionary Forces in the Miracle of Dunkirk.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 21

We need more Economic Patriots on the team! Consider what you can do now to help strengthen America or even help someone in need. Keep in touch with your congressional representatives. Choose from the list or set your own goals:

√ Get others to sign up on our website (https://www.economicwarroom.com) and review our free weekly Economic Battle Plans.TM Each of these will address critical solutions to the threats highlighted in this briefing

√ Follow, like, comment, and share on FB and Twitter. Look for short video segments on FB and Rumble. and make sure those are shared. We recognize these tools may be compromised at times, but if they are not filtered, they are the major platforms available to reach out to the public. [Know that alternatives to the social platforms listed above are under EWR consideration.]

√ Check out XOTV (https://xotv.me/channels/233-economic-war-room), a new free speech video platform that Economic War Room is proud to partner with. Access is FREE but consider making a donation to EWR on that website to help with Economic War Room’s research and production costs.

√ You are welcome to share this battle plan and our short video segments with friends on FB, YouTube or Rumble. We set up the Economic War Room® to be your resource for information, preparation, and mobilization.

√ Do this now! Have a financial action plan based on multiple geopolitical scenarios developed now. Advanced preparation is key. Trying to figure what to do when an economic event happens is usually too late.

√ Talk with your financial advisor as it relates to your savings/investments. Ensure your advisor understand the potential impact economic/geo-political scenarios could have on your portfolio. LOOK FOR ECONOMIC WAR ROOM’S ADVISOR AND INVESTOR ONLINE TRAINING COURSES COMING SOON.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 22

Shareable Quote:

“What we are seeing play out is perhaps the most intense Economic Warfare you will see.

That’s because the battle for control of America is largely about the money. If we lose integrity

in our elections, we will lose America.”–Kevin Freeman

*DISCLAIMER: The Economic War Room® and its affiliates do not provide investment advice. In cases where guests or others may discuss investment ideas, these should not be viewed or construed as advice. The sole purpose is education and information. And, viewers should realize that in any case past performance is not indicative of future results. Neither Kevin Freeman, his guests or EWR-Media Holdings, LLC suggests, offers, or guarantees any specific outcome or profit. You should be aware of the real risk of loss in following any strategy or investment even if discussed on the show or any show-affiliated materials or websites. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs and is not intended as recommendations appropriate for you. You must make independent decisions regarding information, investments, or strategies mentioned on this website or on the show. Before acting on information on economicwarroom.com website or on the show, or any related materials, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and strongly consider seeking advice from your own financial or investment advisor.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 23

The EWR Collection Deck – From Kevin Freeman(List of resources and external links for more information)

Quick Access LinksUnderstanding the Election Fraud

Evidence of Election Irregularities

Using Data

Bi-Partisan Proof That Voting Machines Can Be Hacked

About Kill Chain Documentary

Appendix:The Immaculate Deception - Peter Navarro ReportOpen Letter to Department of Justice - EveryLegalVote.com

[ ] - Must Read/WatchWhere to Access Economic War Room

On BlazeTV https://get.blazetv.com/economic-war-room/

Our Website https://www.economicwarroom.com/

Our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/economicwarroom/

Our Twitter page https://twitter.com/economicwarroom

Our YouTube page https://www.youtube.com/economicwarroomwithkevinfreeman

Our Rumble page https://rumble.com/c/c-408647

Our XOTV Channel https://xotv.me/channels/233-economic-war-room

Link to all Economic Battle Plans™ https://www.economicwarroom.com/battleplans

Understanding the Election Fraud

[ ] Every Legal Vote website www.EveryLegalVote.com

[ ] Primer on Fraud https://everylegalvote.com/primer

Fraud PhD https://everylegalvote.com/phd

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 24

[ ] Fraud Stories https://everylegalvote.com/explore

[ ] Economic War Room Shows https://www.economicwarroom.com/myvote

Never, Never Surrender https://youtu.be/EBRNDWcuw9g

Trump Supporters Rally in Washington to Protest Vote Fraud, Mediahttps://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-supporters-hold-rally-in-washington-to-protest-vote-fraud-media_3579324.html

Keet Lewis With EveryLegalVote.com On Lou Dobbshttps://libertycgc.com/keet-lewis-with-everylegalvote-com-on-lou-dobbs/

[ ] NTD Interview https://www.ntd.com/ntd-business-full-broadcast-nov-13_527707.html

Washington Watch Interview https://www.tonyperkins.com/get.cfm?i=LR20K09

Sandy Rios Interviewhttps://afr.net/podcasts/sandy-rios-in-the-morning/2020/november/interview-with-kevin-freeman-on-everylegalvotecom-and-massive-biden-only-votes/

Kevin Freeman | ACWT Interview 11.17.20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSom2SP8FBQ

EveryLegalVote interview on NewsMax https://youtu.be/5D-XsUEwwhM

[ ] Russ Ramsland on America Can We Talk https://youtu.be/0K3UHBN3O9k

Securing America Election Fraud Specialhttps://www.securingamerica.tv/securing-america-election-fraud-special/

[ ] War Room: Pandemic Ep 542 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVZLYXS_u6s&t=1659

Liquid Lunch on Every Legal Vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTD64bzs34

Glenn Beck Interviews Kevin Freeman https://youtu.be/qF9l05tSesc

Evidence of Election Irregularities

[ ] Do We Have Transparent Elections? https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ca0fT5OvE1XW/

Everything You Need to Know About 2020 Election Fraud, but the Media Won’t Let You Ask | The Streamhttps://stream.org/everything-you-need-to-know-about-2020-election-fraud-but-the-media-wont-let-you-ask/

McLaughlin Poll: Majority See Vote Fraud as National Problemhttps://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/electors-voters/2020/12/15/id/1001650/Pennsylvania Certified Results Found In Error By More Than 200,000 Votes https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/pennsylvania-certified-results-found-in-error-by-more-than-200000-votes/

[ ] Voting by mail and absentee voting | MIT Election Labhttps://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-mail-and-absentee-voting

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 25

[ ] How to Rig an Election — National Election Defense Coalitionhttps://www.electiondefense.org/how-to-rig-an-election

EXCLUSIVE #StopTheSteal Evidence Dump: Proof Of Voter Fraud In 17 Stateshttps://newrightnetwork.com/2020/11/exclusive-stopthesteal-evidence-dump-proof-of-voter-fraud-in-17-states.html/

Video: Phill Kline—New Amistad Project Election Lawsuit; $500 Million to Increase Votes in Democratic Strongholds?https://www.theepochtimes.com/video-phill-kline-new-amistad-project-election-lawsuit-500-million-to-increase-votes-in-democratic-strongholds_3632254.html

[ ] Who is stealing America?https://www.ntd.com/2020-election-investigation-who-is-stealing-america_540191.html

Wisconsin dissenting opinionhttps://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzlinghttps://spectator.us/reasons-why-the-2020-presidential-election-is-deeply-puzzling/

Doubts cast over claims of fair and free electionhttps://www.wnd.com/2020/12/doubts-cast-claims-fair-free-election/

[ ] Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Nighthttps://www.theepochtimes.com/what-happened-in-atlanta-on-election-night-2_3607130.html

‘Tsunami’ of vote-fraud evidence rolled out in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michiganhttps://www.wnd.com/2020/12/tsunami-vote-fraud-evidence-rolled-pennsylvania-arizona-george-michigan/

[ ] Reported Burst Pipe in Atlanta Ballot Counting Area Was Overflowing Urinal: Investigatorhttps://www.theepochtimes.com/reported-burst-pipe-in-atlanta-ballot-counting-area-was-overflowing-urinal-investigator_3607741.html

Georgia Poll Observers Say They Were Effectively Told to Go Homehttps://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-poll-observers-say-they-effectively-were-told-to-go-home_3605825.html

Election Fraud Allegations: Infographichttps://www.theepochtimes.com/election-fraud-allegations-infographic_3605589.html

What’s Happening in US Election Matches What Happened in Venezuela, Expert Sayshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/whats-happening-in-us-election-matches-what-happened-in-venezuela-expert-says_3605487.html

[ ] “Dominion Contractor at Detroit Counting Center: 1000’s of Ballots Scanned Multiple Timeshttps://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/dominion-contractor-detroit-counting-center-says-thousands-ballots-were

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 26

3 Percent of Nevada Mail Ballots in Question After Survey Finds Defrauded Votershttps://www.theepochtimes.com/3-percent-of-nevada-mail-ballots-in-question-after-survey-finds-defrauded-voters_3602843.html

Election lawyer alleges Zuckerberg, wife tried to illegally influence election in Michiganhttps://saraacarter.com/election-lawyer-alleges-zuckerberg-wife-tried-to-illegally-influence-election-in-michigan/

[ ] A Running Compendium of Fraud Charges in Election 2020https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/12/07/a_running_compendium_of_fraud_charges_in_election_2020_126261.html No, The Georgia Vote-Counting Video Was Not ‘Debunked.’ Not Even Closehttps://thefederalist.com/2020/12/07/no-the-georgia-vote-counting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/

‘Voter Integrity Project’ Releases Evidence of Thousands of Vote Fraud Issues – Combined with Affidavits from Rudy and Gateway Pundit’s Statistical Analysis – More Than Enough Information to Refute Election Resultshttps://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/voter-integrity-project-releases-evidence-thousands-vote-fraud-issues-combined-affidavits-rudy-statistical-analysis-enough-information-available-confirming-tr/

Whoa: Nearly a Third of Democrats Believe the Election Was Stolen From Trump https://davidharrisjr.com/steven/whoa-nearly-a-third-of-democrats-believe-the-election-was-stolen-from-trump/

Willful Blindness https://jrnyquist.blog/2020/11/20/willful-blindness/

[ ] ‘There Was in Fact Fraud That Took Place:’ FEC Chairman Trey Trainorhttps://www.theepochtimes.com/there-was-in-fact-fraud-that-took-place-fec-chairman-trey-trainor_3588656.html

Using Data

Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities https://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16469

[ ] PATRICK BYRNE | ACWT INTERVIEW 12.9.20https://americacanwetalk.org/patrick-byrne-acwt-interview-12-9-20/

Our Problems Are In Code We Don’t Wanthttps://jayvalentine.com/our-problems-are-in-code-we-dont-want/

Jay Valentine | The Man That Actually Built Ebay’s Fraud Protection Engine Exposes Voter Fraudhttps://www.thrivetimeshow.com/business-podcasts/jay-valentine/

Statistician and Fraud Expert Jay Valentine Weighs In On The Latest Election Results And What’s Nexthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi6euD3HLyQ

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 27

[ ] Securing America Election Fraud Special #26.4 - Jay Valentine - 11/25/20https://youtu.be/kZpm38pE2MM

Impossible! Michigan, Georgia, PA and VA All Show the Exact Same Vote Ratio Between Trump and Biden Among Mail-In Voteshttps://rightwaypundit.com/impossible-michigan-georgia-pa-and-va-all-show-the-exact-same-vote-ratio-between-trump-and-biden-among-mail-in-votes/

[ ] Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD Testimony 113020 https://youtu.be/nwHa1pfyJjc

[ ] Show the Graphs, Mr. President! https://stream.org/show-the-graphs-mr-president/

[ ] DATA: Michigan Analysis Suggests Absentee Votes ‘Manipulated By Computer’, Flags Hundreds Of Thousands Of Ballotshttps://thenationalpulse.com/politics/michigan-election-fraud-analysis/

In sworn statement, prominent mathematician flags up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballotshttps://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mathematics-prof-says-sworn-statement-many-56000-gop-ballots-pa-may-be

Bi-Partisan Proof That Voting Machines Can Be Hacked

[ ] 2018 NY Times Video: Professor Shows Students How Easy It Is to Hack a Dominion Voting Machinehttps://bongino.com/2018-ny-times-video-professor-shows-students-how-easy-it-is-to-hack-a-dominion-voting-machine/

Democratic senators warned of potential ‘vote switching’ by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 electionhttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/democratic-senators-warned-of-potential-vote-switching-by-dominion-voting-machines-prior-to-2020-election

[ ] Reliability of pricey new voting machines questionedhttps://www.denverpost.com/2020/02/23/new-voting-machines-reliability-questioned/

Top Democrats Raised Concerns About Dominion Voting Technology in 2019https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/13/top-democrats-raised-concerns-about-dominion-voting-technology-in-2019/

[ ] 2019 MSNBC report on hacking voter machineshttps://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1330364450935812100?s=21

HBO’s John Oliver Called It ‘Completely Insane’ to Use Electronic Voting Machines in Nov. 2019https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/11/21/hbos-john-oliver-called-it-completely-insane-to-use-electronic-voting-machines/

‘Software I Hacked In 2005 Is Still In Use’: Cyber Security Expert Harri Hursti On 2020 Presidential Electionhttps://newyork.cbslocal.com/2020/03/23/software-i-hacked-in-2005-is-still-in-use-cyber-security-expert-hari-hursti-on-2020-presidential-election/

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 28

[ ] U.S. Lab: Electronic Voting Machines Shockingly Easy to Hackhttps://rodmartin.org/u-s-lab-electronic-voting-machines-shockingly-easy-to-hack/

[ ] Smartmatic, Comelec execs indicted https://manilastandard.net/mobile/article/238782

[ ] 2006 CNN report on voting machines https://twitter.com/squirrel_hockey/status/1330591189645529090

About Kill Chain Documentary

[ ] Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections - Watch the HBO Original Documentary | HBOhttps://www.hbo.com/documentaries/kill-chain-the-cyber-war-on-americas-elections

Hackers Easily Breach U.S. Voting Machines in Chilling ‘Kill Chain’ Trailerhttps://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/kill-chain-hbo-documentary-voting-security-hack-trailer-962328/

HBO video makes claims about hacked Alaska election computer system in 2016https://mustreadalaska.com/hbo-video-makes-claims-about-hacking-alaska-election-system-in-2016/

‘Kill Chain’: HBO’s Election Security Doc Stresses Urgencyhttps://www.wired.com/story/hbo-kill-chain-election-security/

An early look at HBO’s election security documentaryhttps://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-cybersecurity/2020/03/16/an-early-look-at-hbos-election-security-documentary-786109

The journal of a plague year; threats of election dysfunctionhttps://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/03/19/arts/journal-plague-year-threats-election-dysfunction/

HBO’s ‘Kill Chain’ reveals scary reality: U.S. voting system under attackhttp://amsterdamnews.com/news/2020/mar/19/hbos-kill-chain-reveals-scary-reality-us-voting-sy/

[ ] Meanwhile, A Deeper Danger Than Pandemichttps://www.forbes.com/sites/melikkaylan/2020/03/24/meanwhile-a-deeper-danger-than-pandemic/

This Documentary Will Show You Just How Fragile Our Democracy Really Ishttps://time.com/5809745/kill-chain-documentary-hbo-review/

Note: The Economic Battle Plan™ contains hyperlinks to other Internet sites not under the editorial control of EWR-Media Holdings, LLC. These hyperlinks

are not express or implied endorsements or approvals by EWR-Media Holdings, LLC, of any products, services or information available from these 3rd

party sites. Links to these 3rd party sites are open source links that may require subscription or registration.

THE EVIDENCE SP.1230CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100)

page 29

APPENDIX

2

Executive Summary

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations,1 testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage. The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump.

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the observed patterns of election irregularities are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election outright, strategically game the election process in such a way as to “stuff the ballot box” and unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket. Topline findings of this report include:

The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities.

The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than

sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.

3

All six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election irregularities.

However, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather

than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.

In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth. This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and the stability of our political system and Republic.

Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a

Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election. If this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people.

The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities

assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches.

o Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia together with Republican majorities

in both chambers of the State Legislatures of five of the six battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin2 – have had both the power and the opportunity to investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities presented in this report. Yet, wilting under intense political pressure, these politicians have failed in their Constitutional duties and responsibilities to do so – and thereby failed both their states and this nation as well as their party.

o Both State courts and Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have failed the

American people in refusing to appropriately adjudicate the election irregularities that have come before them. Their failures pose a great risk to the American Republic.

If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and

thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again – with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.

4

I. Introduction

At the stroke of midnight on Election Day, President Donald J. Trump appeared well on his way to winning a second term. He was already a lock to win both Florida and Ohio; and no Republican has ever won a presidential election without winning Ohio while only two Democrats have won the presidency without winning Florida.3 At the same time, the Trump-Pence ticket had substantial and seemingly insurmountable leads in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. If these leads held, these four key battleground states would propel President Trump to a decisive 294 to 244 victory in the Electoral College. Shortly after midnight, however, as a flood of mail-in and absentee ballots began entering the count, the Trump red tide of victory began turning Joe Biden blue. As these mail-in and absentee ballots were tabulated, the President’s large leads in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin simply vanished into thin Biden leads. At midnight on the evening of November 3, and as illustrated in Table 1, President Trump was ahead by more than 110,000 votes in Wisconsin and more than 290,000 votes in Michigan. In Georgia, his lead was a whopping 356,945; and he led in Pennsylvania by more than half a million votes. By December 7, however, these wide Trump leads would turn into razor thin Biden leads – 11,779 votes in Georgia, 20,682 votes in Wisconsin, 81,660 votes in Pennsylvania, and 154,188 votes in Michigan.

Table 1: A Trump Red Tide Turns Biden Blue

There was an equally interesting story unfolding in Arizona and Nevada. While Joe Biden was ahead in these two additional battleground states on election night – by just over 30,000 votes in Nevada and less than 150,000 votes in Arizona – internal Trump Campaign polls predicted the President would close these gaps once all the votes were counted. Of course, this never happened. In the wake of this astonishing reversal of Trump fortune, a national firestorm has erupted over the fairness and integrity of one of the most sacrosanct institutions in America – our presidential election system. Critics on the Right and within the Republican Party – including President Trump himself – have charged that the election was stolen. They have backed up these damning charges with more than 50 lawsuits,4 thousands of supporting affidavits and declarations, and seemingly incriminating videos, photos, and first-hand accounts of all manner of chicanery.5

5

Critics on the Left and within the Democrat Party have, on the other hand, dismissed these charges as the sour grapes of a whining loser. Some of these critics have completely denied any fraud, misconduct or malfeasance altogether. Others have acknowledged that while some election irregularities may have existed, they strenuously insist that these irregularities are not significant enough to overturn the election. There is a similar Battle Royale raging between large anti-Trump segments of the so-called “mainstream” media and alternative conservative news outlets. Across the anti-Trump mainstream media diaspora – which includes most prominently print publications like the New York Times and Washington Post and cable TV networks like CNN and MSNBC – a loud chorus of voices has been demanding that President Trump concede the election. These same anti-Trump voices have been equally quick to denounce or discredit anyone – especially anyone within their own circle – that dares to investigate what may well turn out to be THE biggest political scandal in American history. Social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube likewise have been actively and relentlessly censoring anyone who dares to call the results of the election into question. In contrast, alternative news outlets, primarily associated with the American conservative movement, have provided extensive, in-depth coverage of the many issues of fraud, misconduct, and other irregularities that are coming to light. From Steve Bannon’s War Room Pandemic6 and John Solomon’s Just the News7 to Raheem Kassam’s National Pulse,8 to Newsmax,9 and One America News Network,10 Americans hungry for facts and breaking developments have been able to find such critical information only by following this alternative coverage. That the American public is not buying what the Democrat Party and the anti-Trump media and social media are selling is evident in public opinion polls. For example, according to a recent Rasmussen poll: “Sixty-two percent (62%) of Republicans say it is ‘Very Likely the Democrats stole the election’” while 28% of Independents and 17% of Democrats share that view.11

If, in fact, compelling evidence comes to light proving the election was indeed stolen after a fait accompli Biden inauguration, we as a country run the very real risk that the very center of our great American union will not hold. To put this another way, if the greatest democracy in world history cannot conduct a free and fair election, and if much of the mainstream media of this country won’t even fully investigate what is becoming a growing mountain of evidence calling into question the election result, there is little chance that our democracy and this Republic will survive as we know it. It is therefore critical that we get to the bottom of this matter. That is the purpose of this report.

6

II. Six Dimensions of Election Irregularities across Six Battleground States

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 presidential election across six key battleground states where the Democrat candidate Joe Biden holds a slim lead, and the results continue to be hotly contested. As documented in the extensive endnotes, the evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony presented in a variety of state venues, published reports and analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments and first-hand accounts, and extensive press coverage. From a review and analysis of this evidence, six major dimensions of alleged election irregularities have been identified and assessed on a state-by-state basis across six key battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. These six dimensions include outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, Equal Protection Clause violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies. The matrix in Table 2 provides an overview of the presence or absence of each of the six dimensions of alleged election irregularities in each of the six battleground states. Column 1 lists each of the six dimensions along with the alleged Biden victory margin and the possible illegal ballots due to election irregularities. Columns 2 through 7 in the matrix then indicate the presence or absence of the election irregularities in any given state. Note that a checkmark in matrix cell indicates there is widespread evidence in a given state for a particular dimension of election irregularity while a star indicates there is at least some evidence.

Table 2: 2020 Alleged Election Irregularities across the Six Battleground States

7

Two key points stand out immediately from the matrix. First, significant irregularities appear to be ubiquitous across the six battleground states. Only Arizona is free of any apparent widespread ballot mishandling while only Pennsylvania lacks significant statistical anomalies. The rest of the matrix in Table 2 is a sea of checkmarks and occasional stars. Second, if one compares the alleged Biden victory margin in Column 7 of the figure with the possible illegal ballots in Column 8, it should be clear that the number of possible illegal ballots dwarfs the alleged Biden victory margin in five of the six states. For example, the alleged Biden victory margin in Nevada is 33,596 votes yet the number of ballots in question is more than three times that. In Arizona, which has the narrowest alleged Biden victory margin at 10,457 votes, there are nearly 10 times that number of possible illegal ballots; and the ratio of the alleged Biden vote lead to possible illegal ballots is even higher for Georgia. Only Michigan is the exception to the rule. This is not because it is likely to be a true exception but simply because there remains insufficient estimates of how the various types of irregularities in Michigan translate into possible illegal votes. Clearly, based on this matrix, the American people deserve a definitive answer as to whether this election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. Absent a thorough investigation prior to Inauguration Day, a cloud and a stain will hang over what will be perceived by many Americans as an illegitimate Biden administration. The next six sections of this report examine in more detail each of the six dimensions of alleged election irregularities.

8

III. Outright Voter Fraud

Outright voter fraud ranges from the large-scale manufacturing of fake ballots, bribery, and dead voters to ballots cast by ineligible voters such as felons and illegal aliens, ballots counted multiple times, and illegal out-of-state voters. Table 3 provides an overview across the six battleground states of the various types of outright voter fraud that have been alleged to be present.

Table 3: Outright Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election

From the figure, we see that different types of fraud may be present in all six states. Let’s more precisely define each of these different types of fraud using examples that are designed to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. Bribery In a voter fraud context, bribery refers to the corrupt solicitation, acceptance, or transfer of value in exchange for official action, such as voter registration or voting for a preferred candidate.12 At least in Nevada, there is a slam dunk case that such bribery occurred. What is so stunning about the Nevada case is the brazen disregard for our federal bribery laws. In the Silver State, in an effort orchestrated by the Biden campaign, Native Americans appear to have traded their votes not for pieces of silver but rather for Visa gift cards, jewelry, and other “swag.”13 According to the Epoch Times, such vote buying schemes also may have occurred in eight other states, including Arizona and Wisconsin.14

9

Fake Ballot Manufacturing and Destruction of Legally Cast Real Ballots Fake ballot manufacturing involves the fraudulent production of ballots on behalf of a candidate; and one of the most disturbing examples of possible fake ballot manufacturing involves a truck driver who has alleged in a sworn affidavit that he picked up large crates of ballots in New York and delivered them to a polling location in Pennsylvania.15 There may be well over 100,000 ballots involved, enough fake ballots alone to have swung the election to Biden in the Keystone State. Likewise in Pennsylvania, there is both a Declaration and a photo that suggests a poll worker used an unsecured USB flash drive to dump an unusually large cache of votes onto vote tabulation machines. The resultant tabulations did not correlate with the mail-in ballots scanned into the machines.16 Arguably the most flagrant example of possible fake ballot manufacturing on behalf of Joe Biden may have occurred at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. The possible perpetrators were caught in flagrante delicto on surveillance video. In one version of this story, poll watchers and observers as well as the media were asked to leave in the middle of the night after a suspicious water leak. Once the room was cleared, several election officials pulled out large boxes of ballots from underneath a draped table. They then proceeded to tabulate a quantity of fake manufactured ballots estimated to be in the range of tens of thousands.17 Note that a large surge in Biden votes following the tabulation of these ballots can be clearly observed after these votes were processed.18 Despite what appears to be damning evidence of a possible crime, a spate of stories appeared across the anti-Trump media diaspora dismissing any concerns. According to these whitewash stories, these were regular and authorized ballot boxes, observers in the media were not asked to leave but simply left on their own, and it is perfectly acceptable to count ballots in the absence of observers.19 Or so the spin goes. Of course, this is precisely the kind of incident that should be fully investigated both by Georgia’s Attorney General as well as by the Federal Department of Justice. Yet it remains unclear as to whether such investigations are underway. Meanwhile, the videotape itself, absent an adequate explanation, has contributed to the current climate of skepticism surrounding the fairness and integrity of the election. Finally, as an example of the possible destruction of legally cast real ballots there is this allegation from a court case filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona: Plaintiffs claim that over 75,000 absentee ballots were reported as unreturned when they were actually returned. These absentee ballots were then either lost or destroyed (consistent with allegations of Trump ballot destruction) and/or were replaced with blank ballots filled out by election workers or other third parties.20

10

Indefinitely Confined Voter Abuses Indefinitely confined voters are those voters unable to vote in person because of old age or some disability. There are two types of possible abuses associated with such indefinitely confined voters. The first kind of abuse involves exploiting the elderly or the infirm by effectively hijacking their identities and votes. For example, in Georgia, the family of an elderly man in a nursing home facility discovered that a mail-in ballot had been requested and submitted under his voter registration identity, yet it was done without his consent.21 In a similar situation in Pennsylvania, two parents and their daughter who has Downs Syndrome went to vote in person and discovered that a mail-in ballot had both been requested and submitted for the daughter without her consent.22 The second kind of indefinitely confined voter abuse is far more consequential, at least in the state of Wisconsin. The key allegation here in several court filings is that “bad-faith voters” registering as “indefinitely confined” intentionally broke “Wisconsin election law to circumvent election integrity photo identification requirements.” In a nutshell, they were able to vote without showing a voter identification photo and therefore underwent a far less rigorous I.D. check than would otherwise have been conducted. This abuse happened, according to one press account, after “clerks in Dane and Milwaukee counties offered illegal advice that encouraged individuals to use indefinite confinement as a way to ignore the state’s photo I.D. requirement.”23 The Trump side has called this correctly an open invitation to fraud; and stories and pictures abound of Wisconsin voters who registered as indefinitely confined but were seen also attending weddings, riding their bikes, going on vacation, and otherwise be anything but confined.24 Here is what is most important about this particular type of election fraud: In the wake of the expanded definition of indefinitely confined voters – a definition ruled legally incorrect by the Wisconsin Supreme Court25 – the number of indefinitely confined voters surged from just under 70,000 voters in 2019 to over 200,000 in 2020.26 This 130,000 vote increment of new indefinitely confined voters is more than five times the Biden victory margin in Wisconsin. Ineligible Voters and Voters Who Voted in Multiple States

Ineligible voters include felons deemed ineligible, underage citizens, nonregistered voters, illegal aliens, illegal out-of-state voters, and voters illegally using a post office box as an address.27 In a court filing by the Trump campaign legal team, lead counsel Ray Smith provided a list of more than 70,000 allegedly ineligible voters casting ballots in Georgia in the 2020 election.28 Also in Georgia, over 20,000 people appear to have filed a Notice of Changed Address form to the Georgia state government or had other indications of moving out of state. Yet, these clearly ineligible out-of-state voters appeared to have remained on the voter rolls and voted in the 2020 election.29 As additional data points regarding ineligible out-of-state voters, there are these: Between 80 and 100 self-proclaimed Black Lives Matter-affiliated members from other states have admitted to having voted in Pennsylvania.30

11

As for those voters who vote in multiple states, one lawsuit claims that roughly 15,000 mail-in or absentee ballots were received in Nevada from voters who were known to have voted in other states.31 It is useful to note here that in Nevada, poll workers allegedly were not consistent in their procedures when checking voters in to vote about whether they accepted California or Nevada Voter Identification as proof of eligibility to register to vote.32

Dead Voters and Ghost Voters According to widespread evidence, there was a surprising number of ballots cast across several key battleground states by deceased voters, sparking one wag to quip, in reference to a classic Bruce Willis movie, this was the “Sixth Sense” election – I see dead people voting. In Pennsylvania, for example, a statistical analysis conducted by the Trump Campaign matching voter rolls to public obituaries found what appears to be over 8,000 confirmed dead voters successfully casting mail-in ballots.33 In Georgia – underscoring the critical role any given category of election irregularities might play in determining the outcome – the estimated number of alleged deceased individuals casting votes almost exactly equals the Biden victory margin. In Michigan, according to one first-hand account offered in a declaration, computer operators at a polling location in Detroit were manually adding the names and addresses of thousands of ballots to vote tabulation systems with voters who had birth dates in 1900.34 And in Nevada, a widower since 2017 saw that his deceased wife had successfully cast a mail-in ballot on November 2, 2020, three and a half years after her death. 35 It may be useful to note here that dead voters played a critical role in stealing the election from Richard Nixon, a theft orchestrated by Mayor Richard Daley and his Chicago political machine. According to one report “more than 3,000 votes [were] cast in the names of individuals who were dead, and more than 31,000 individuals voted twice in different locations in the city.” President Kennedy’s victory margin in Illinois was less than 9,000 votes. On the Ghost Voter front, a “Ghost Voter” is a voter who requests and submits a ballot under the name of a voter who no longer resides at the address where that voter was registered. In Georgia for example, it is alleged that over 20,000 absentee or early voters – almost twice the Biden victory margin – cast their ballots after having moved out of state.36 In Nevada, a poll worker reported that there were as many as 50 ballots per day being delivered to homes vacated by their former residents.37 Counting Ballots Multiple Times Counting ballots multiple times occurs most egregiously when batches of ballots are repeatedly rescanned and re-tabulated in electronic voting machines. It can also happen when the same person votes multiple times within the same day. Evidence of these particular kinds of “ballot stuffing” are present across all six battleground states.

12

For example, in Wisconsin, poll workers were observed running ballots through tabulation machines more than once.38 In Wayne County, Michigan, Republican poll watchers observed canvassers re-scanning batches of ballots through vote tabulation machines up to 3 to 4 times.39 In Pennsylvania, a poll worker observed a woman vote twice in the same day by changing her appearance.40 Another poll worker observed people in voting lines in one corner of a polling location voting, and then coming to another polling location at the other side of the building to vote.41 Still another poll worker witnessed a woman voting twice at voting machines on Election Day.42

IV. Ballot Mishandling

Ballot mishandling represents the second major dimension of alleged election irregularities in the 2020 presidential election. As Table 4 illustrates, this is a multifaceted problem across the battleground states. Let’s work our way through this figure starting with the failure to properly check the identification of voters.

Table 4: Ballot Mishandling in the Battleground States

No Voter I.D. Check It is critical for the integrity of any election for poll workers to properly verify a voter’s identity and registration when that voter comes in to cast an in-person ballot. However, there is at least some evidence of a lack of adequate voter ID check across several of the battleground states. For example, in Michigan, the chairperson of a polling location permitted an individual to vote without presenting voter identification and another with only a photocopy of a driver’s license.43

13

In Nevada, poll workers were instructed to advise people who wanted to register to vote and did not have proper Nevada IDs or Driver’s Licenses to do the following: These unregistered voters could go outside into the parking lot and make an appointment with the Department of Motor Vehicles as late as January 2021 to obtain a Nevada Driver’s License as proof of their identity. They could then bring in confirmation of their DMV appointment in either paper or digital form; and that would be sufficient to allow them to be registered.44 Signature Matching Abuses It is equally critical that ballot counters legally verify mail-in and absentee ballots by checking if the signatures on the outer envelopes match the voters’ registration records.45 Note, however, that a variety of signature matching abuses represent a major issue in Nevada, Pennsylvania, and especially in Georgia. In Georgia, contrary to state law, the Secretary of State entered into a Consent Decree with the Democrat Party that weakened signature matching to just one verification instead of two. This illegal weakening of the signature match test has called into question more than 1.2 million mail-in ballots cast in Georgia.46 Georgia is not the only state where signature match check abuses have surfaced. Nevada law requires that persons – not machines – review all signatures and ballots. Yet the Clark County Registrar of Voters used a defective signature matching computer system called Agilis to conduct such checks.47 As will be discussed further below, this problem of machines replacing humans contrary to Nevada state law was compounded by the fact that the Agilis system has an unacceptably low accuracy rate, making it easier for illegal ballots to slip through its screen.48 Signature match abuses also surfaced in Wisconsin where mandatory voter information certifications for mail-in ballots were reduced and/or eliminated, again contrary to state law. As noted in one lawsuit, this change “undermined the authority of the state legislature, reduced the security and integrity of the election by making it easier to engage in mail-in ballot fraud and created another standard-less rule in conflict with the clear terms of the Wisconsin Election Code, preventing uniform treatment of absentee ballots throughout the State.”49 “Naked Ballots” Lacking Outer Envelope A naked ballot is a mail-in or absentee ballot lacking an outer envelope with the voter’s signature on it. It is illegal to accept the naked ballot as the outer envelope provides the only way to verify a voter’s identity. The illegal acceptance of naked ballots appears to be particularly acute in Pennsylvania as a result of ill-advised “guidance” issued by the Secretary of State – a registered Democrat50 – that such naked ballots be counted.

14

This issuance of such guidance, in violation of state law,51 appears to be a blatant attempt by a Democrat politician to boost the count for Joe Biden as it was clear that Democrats would be voting disproportionately higher through mail-in ballots. This incident is especially egregious because when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected this guidance, the Secretary of State refused to issue new guidance directing election officials to NOT count non-compliant mail-in or absentee ballots.52 Broken Chain of Custody & Unauthorized Ballot Handling or Movements The maintenance of a proper chain of custody for ballots cast is the linchpin of fair elections. Chain of custody is broken when a ballot is fraudulently transferred, controlled, or moved without adequate supervision or oversight.53 While chain of custody issues can apply to all ballots, the risk of a broken chain of custody is obviously higher for mail-in and absentee ballots. This is because the ballots have to go through more hands. In the 2020 presidential election, the increased use – often illegal use – of unsupervised drop boxes arguably has enhanced the risk of a broken chain of custody. So, too, has the increased practice of so-called “ballot harvesting” whereby third parties pick up ballots from voters and deliver them to drop boxes or directly to election officials. Both drop boxes and ballot harvesting provide opportunities for bad actors to insert fraudulent ballots into the election process. That this is a very serious matter is evident in this observation by BlackBoxVoting.org: “In court cases, chain of custody violations can result in refusal to admit evidence or even throwing a case out. In elections, chain of custody violations can result in ‘incurable uncertainty’ and court orders to redo elections.”54 (emphasis added) As an example of the drop box problem, in Pennsylvania, ballots were illegally dumped into drop boxes at the Nazareth ballot drop center in violation of state law.55 Likewise in Pennsylvania, a man caught on videotape and photos came out of an unmarked Jeep extracting ballots from an unsupervised ballot drop-box to bring them into a ballot counting center. That same man was observed to come back with an empty ballot container to place in the unsupervised drop box.56 In Wisconsin, the state’s Election Committee illegally positioned five hundred drop boxes for collection of absentee ballots across the state. However, these drop boxes were disproportionately located in urban areas which tend to have much higher Democrat registration, thereby favoring the candidacy of Joe Biden. Note: Any use of a drop box in Wisconsin is illegal by statute. Therefore, the votes cast through them cannot be legally counted in any certified election result.57 As an example of ballot harvesting – in this case at the front end of the process – 25,000 ballots were requested from nursing home residents in Pennsylvania at the same time.58

15

As additional examples of a possible broken chain of custody, there are these: Large bins of absentee ballots arrived at the Central Counting Location in Wisconsin with already opened envelopes, meaning that ballots could have been tampered with.59 They were nonetheless counted. Also in Wisconsin, an election worker was observed moving bags of blank ballots into a vehicle and then driving off without supervision.60 There is also the previously referenced case whereby a truck driver has offered a firsthand account of moving large quantities of fake manufactured ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. As a final note on the unauthorized handling or movement of ballots, there is the problem of illegal ballot counters. These are persons who not legally permitted and/or certified to be counting ballots. In one curious case, an individual who worked as an official photographer for Kamala Harris’ campaign in 201961 was alleged to be involved in scanning ballots in Floyd County, Georgia. Ballot counters cannot have any ties to candidates in a presidential election.

Ballots Accepted Without Postmarks and Backdating of Ballots Across all of the battleground states, it is against state law for poll workers to count either mail-in or absentee ballots that lack postmarks. It is also illegal to backdate ballots so that they may be considered as having met the election deadline for the receipt and counting of such ballots. There is some evidence of these irregularities in several of the battleground states. For example, in Wisconsin, according to one Declaration, employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) in Milwaukee were repeatedly instructed by two managers to backdate late-arriving ballots so they could still be counted.62 In addition, the USPS was alleged to have backdated as many as 100,000 ballots in Wisconsin.63 Similarly, in Detroit, Michigan, as noted in a court case, poll workers were instructing ballot counters to backdate absentee ballots so they could be counted.64 One poll watcher also observed ballots in Michigan being run through vote tabulation machines without postmarks on them.65

16

V. Contestable Process Fouls

Contestable process fouls represent the third dimension of election irregularities in the 2020 presidential election. The various forms such process fouls can take are illustrated in Table 5 across the six battleground states. Table 5: Contestable Process Fouls in the Battleground States

Abuses of Poll Watchers and Observers Central to the fairness and integrity of any election is the processes by which observers monitor the receipt, opening, and counting of the ballots. You can see in the Table 5 that poll watcher and observer abuses were present across all six battleground states. In Georgia,66 Michigan,67 and Pennsylvania,68 poll watchers and observers were denied entry to ballot counting centers by Judges of Elections and other poll workers. This was despite presenting proper certification and identification. In Georgia,69 Michigan,70 Nevada,71 and Pennsylvania,72 Republican poll watchers were also forced inside confined areas, thereby limiting their view. In some cases, this confinement was enforced by local law enforcement.

17

Across these four battleground states, Republican poll watchers were also directed to stand at unreasonably lengthy distances from ballot counters. In Michigan – arguably the “first among equals” when it comes to observer abuses – poll workers put up poster boards on the windows of the room where ballots were being processed and counted so as to block the view.73 In Pennsylvania, tens of thousands of ballots were processed in back rooms where poll observers were prohibited from being able to observe at all.74 This is an extremely serious matter because it is these poll watchers and observers who represent the frontline defenders of a fair election process. Their job is to make sure all ballots are handled properly and tabulated accordingly. They seek to answer questions like: Is there a signature match process being conducted? Does each ballot have an outer envelope or is it a naked ballot? Are ballots being run more than once through the tabulation machines? When poll watchers or observers are barred from viewing or forced to view from unacceptably large distances, these watchdogs cannot accurately answer these questions. They, therefore, cannot fulfill their critical watchdog function. Mail-In Ballot and Absentee Ballot Rules Violated Contrary to State Law In Georgia, more than 300,000 individuals were permitted to vote who had applied for an absentee ballot more than 180 days prior to the Election Day. This is a clear violation of state law.75 In both Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Democrat election officials acted unilaterally to accept both mail-in and absentee ballots after Election Day. State Republicans have argued this is contrary to state law. In Pennsylvania, absentee and mail-in ballots were accepted up to three days after Election Day.76 On November 7th, in anticipation of a legal challenge, the United States Supreme Court ordered that the approximately 10,000 absentee and mail-in ballots that had arrived past November 3rd be separated from ballots that had arrived on Election Day.77 This direction notwithstanding, a poll watcher reported on November 7th that, in Delaware County, ballots received the previous night were not being separated from ballots received on Election Day, contrary to state law.78 Wisconsin state law does not permit early voting. Nonetheless, city officials in the Democrat stronghold of Madison, Wisconsin assisted in the creation of more than 200 “Democracy in the Park” illegal polling places. These faux polling places were promoted and supported by the Biden campaign. They provided witnesses for absentee ballots and acted in every way like legal polling places. Moreover, they received ballots outside of the limited 14-day period preceding an election that is authorized by statute for in-person or absentee balloting. These were clear violations of state law.79

18

Voters Not Properly Registered Allowed to Vote One of the jobs of poll workers is to ensure that in-person voters are legally registered and are who they say they are. Across at least three of the six battleground states – Georgia, Nevada, and Wisconsin – this job may not have been effectively done. In Wisconsin, for example, officials refused to allow poll watchers to challenge the qualifications of people applying to vote or require proof of such persons’ qualifications.80 In Georgia, more than 2,000 individuals appear to have voted who were not listed in the State’s records as having been registered to vote.81 In Pennsylvania, a poll watcher observed poll workers taking individuals whose names did not appear in voter registration books back into a separate area that was unobserved by any poll watchers. There, these apparently unregistered voters met with a Judge of Elections who allegedly told them: “you go back in, tell them this is your name, and you can vote.”82 Illegal Campaigning at Poll Locations Poll workers are supposed to remain politically neutral. When a poll worker displays bias for one political candidate over another at a polling location, this is contrary to state law. Unfortunately, this law appears to have been repeatedly violated in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. For example, in Pennsylvania, poll workers were wearing paraphernalia from a group called “Voter Protection.” This is a 100% Democrat-funded Political Action Committee dedicated to Democrat redistricting in Pennsylvania; and the wearing of its paraphernalia constitutes illegal campaigning at the polls.83 In a similar type of illegal campaigning in Michigan, poll workers were allowed to wear Black Lives Matter shirts and were seen carrying tote bags of President Obama paraphernalia.84 In addition, poll workers with Biden and Obama campaign shirts on were allowed on the ballot counting floor.85 In Wisconsin, representatives from the Biden campaign were outside with clipboards talking to voters on their way in to vote. They were clearly inside the prohibited perimeter for electioneering. Poll workers did nothing to address this illegal campaigning despite the objections of observers.86 Ballots Cured by Poll Workers or Voters Contrary to Law Under prescribed circumstances, both poll workers and voters may fix ballots with mistakes or discrepancies. This process is known as “ballot curing.” In nineteen states, poll workers must notify voters if there are errors or discrepancies on their ballots and allow them to “cure” or correct any errors so their votes will count.87 However, in states that do not allow curing, ballots with discrepancies such as missing or mismatched signatures must be discarded.88

19

In Pennsylvania, and contrary to state law, poll workers were trained to allow voters to cure or “correct” their ballots.89 According to one court filing, Democrat-controlled counties in Pennsylvania participated in pre-canvass activities prior to Election Day “by reviewing received mail-in ballots for deficiencies.”90 Such discrepancies included “lacking the inner secrecy envelope or lacking a signature of the elector on the outer declaration envelope.” Voters were then notified so that they could cure their ballots – a clear violation of state law.91 Numerous other examples of illegally cured ballots abound. For example, in Wisconsin, tens of thousands of ballots were observed to be corrected or cured despite election observer objections.92 In Pennsylvania, poll workers sorted approximately 4,500 ballots with various errors into bins. Poll workers then re-filled out the 4,500 ballots so that they could be read by tabulation machines, an action contrary to state law.93 In Michigan, poll workers altered the dates on the outer envelopes of the ballots so that they would be able to count them.94 Michigan poll workers also filled out blank ballots to “correct” mail-in and absentee ballots according to what they believed the “voter had intended.”95

VI. Equal Protection Clause Violations

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and a fundamental pillar of the American Republic. This Equal Protection Clause mandates that no State may deny its citizens equal protection of its governing laws.96 Table 6 illustrates three major alleged violations of the Equal Protection Clause in the 2020 presidential election. As the table illustrates, each violation was observed to occur across all six battleground states.

Table 6: Equal Protection Clause Violations in the Six Battleground States

20

Higher Standards of Certification & I.D. Verification Applied to In-Person Voters The first alleged violation focuses on the application of higher standards of certification and voter identification for in-person voters than mail-in and absentee ballot voters. In effect, these higher standards disproportionately benefited the candidacy of Joe Biden because President Trump had a much higher percentage of in-person voters than mail-in and absentee voters. Indeed, mail-in and absentee ballots were largely skewed for Joe Biden across the country by ratios as high as 3 out of 4 votes in some states.97 Note here that much of the alleged fraud and ballot mishandling focused on mail-in voters and absentee ballots. Therefore, the lower the level of scrutiny of these voters, the more illegal votes for Joe Biden relative to Donald Trump could slip in. It should likewise be noted here that this particular violation of the Equal Protection Clause was further enabled by poll watchers being denied meaningful observation. Perhaps the most egregious examples of this particular violation of the Equal Protection clause occurred in Georgia and Michigan. Georgia, for example, requires ID for voting in-person and Michigan will only allow provisional voting without an ID. However, in both Georgia and Michigan, a valid ID is not required to vote by mail so long as the person has already registered in a previous election. These procedures are ripe for fraud. In fact, there is evidence that election fraudsters targeted voters who had voted in past elections but not voted in more recent ones. These fraudsters could then cast ballots on behalf of these infrequent voters with little likelihood they would be caught. Numerous affidavits, however, detail persons arriving to vote at polls only to be informed that records indicate they had already voted. At least fourteen such affidavits have been made by Georgians. As a further example, in Wisconsin, mail-in ballots were accepted without witness signatures placed properly in the allocated envelope location.98 A comparable process for in-person voting would have resulted in the invalidation of the vote. Different Standards of Ballot Curing As a second major violation of the Equal Protection Clause, likewise observed across all six battleground states, different standards for correcting mistakes on ballots (ballot curing) were applied across different jurisdictions within the states. Often, jurisdictions with predominantly Democrat registration were more expansive about allowing the curing of ballots than jurisdictions with predominantly Republican registration. In Pennsylvania, there was a clear difference between how ballots were – or were not – cured in Republican counties versus Democrat counties. When Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued illegal guidance authorizing counties to cure ballots, this illegal guidance was not followed in at least eight different Republican counties.99 Meanwhile, ballots were cured in Democrat counties under this illegal guidance.100

21

In Arizona, there likewise was a clear difference between how in-person voters were treated versus mail-in ballots. On the one hand, mail-in voters had up to 5 days to “cure” or “fix” invalid mail-in ballots sent prior to Election Day.101 On the other hand, in-person voters in Maricopa County, for example, had to deal with poll workers who did not know how to work electronic voting machines properly. This resulted in thousands of in-person votes being marked incorrectly and disregarded rather than cured.102

Differential and Partisan Poll Watcher Treatment In most states, political party candidates and ballot issue committees are able to appoint poll watchers and observers to oversee the ballot counting process.103 Such poll watchers and observers must be registered voters and present certification to the Judge of Elections in order to be able to fulfill their duties at a polling location.104 Such certified poll watchers should be free to observe at appropriate distances regardless of their party affiliation. Yet in key Democrat strongholds, e.g., Dane County in Wisconsin and Wayne County in Michigan, which yielded high Biden vote counts, Republican poll watchers and observers were frequently subject to different treatment ranging from denial of entry to polling places to harassment and intimidation. For example, in Georgia, a certified poll watcher witnessed other poll workers at a polling location discussing how they should not speak to her due to her party affiliation. 105 In Pennsylvania, a Republican poll watcher was harassed and removed from the polling location due to his party affiliation.106 In Wisconsin, a Republican poll watcher was prevented from observing due to the fact that polling locations were not allowing Republicans in.107 Note the synergy here between the problem of the process foul involved with denying access to certified poll watchers (discussed in the previous section) and the violation of the Equal Protection Clause such conduct entails when such denial, harassment, and intimidation differs by party affiliation.

22

VII. 2020 Election Voting Machine Irregularities

Perhaps no device illustrates that technology is a double-edged sword than the machines and associated software that have come to be used to tabulate votes across all 50 states.108 Types of voting equipment include optical scanners used to process paper ballots, direct recording electronic systems which voters can use to directly input their choices, and various marking devices to produce human-readable ballots.109 Two main types of voting machine irregularities have been alleged in the 2020 presidential election. As Table 7 illustrates, these types of irregularities include large-scale voting machine inaccuracies together with inexplicable vote switching and vote surges, often in favor Joe Biden.

Table 7: 2020 Voting Machine Irregularities

Large-Scale Voting Machine Inaccuracies Much has been made about the shadowy genesis of a company called Dominion which provides

voting machines and equipment to 28 states.110 According to critics, Dominion’s roots may be

traced to an effort by the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez to rig his sham elections.111 Dominion

is also alleged to have ties to the Clinton Foundation,112 while the Smartmatic software used in the

Dominion machines is alleged to have links to the shadowy anti-Trump globalist financier George

Soros.113

The controversy swirling over Dominion and Smartmatic notwithstanding, one of the biggest

problems with machine inaccuracies may be traced to a company called Agilis. Nevada election

officials in Clark County, a Democrat stronghold in Nevada, used Agilis signature verification

machines to check over 130,000 mail-in ballot signatures.

According to a court case filed in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City, the Agilis

machines used a “lower image quality than suggested by the manufacturer.” Clark County

Election Department officials also lowered the accuracy rate below the manufacturer’s

recommendations, making the whole verification process unreliable. 114

23

In a test run, it was proven that, at the manufacturer’s setting, the Agilis machine already had a

high tolerance for inaccuracies—as high as 50% non-matching. In other words, half of the ballots

that might be moved through the machine would be impossible to verify; and Clark County

officials lowered that threshold even further.115

As a final comment on this case, there is also the broader legal matter that the Agilis machines

were used to “entirely replace signature verification by election personnel.” This is contrary to

Nevada state law.

As noted in a court case: “In violation of Nevada law, the Clark County Election Department

allows the Agilis machine to solely verify 30% of the signatures accompanying the mail-in ballots

without ever having humans inspect those signatures.”116

A similar problem has been alleged in a court filing in Arizona with a software known as the Novus

6.0.0.0. In cases where ballots were too damaged or illegible to be read by vote tabulation

machines, Novus was used in an attempt to cure or restore the ballots. The system would do so by

trying to read the applicable scans of the original rejected ballots. However, as noted in a court

case filed by Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party: “the software was highly

inaccurate, and it often flipped the vote.” 117 Inexplicable Vote Switching and Vote Surges In Favor of Biden As a further complication to the Novus software problem in Arizona referenced above, the software was not only highly inaccurate. According to observers, and as an example of

inexplicable vote switching, “the software would erroneously prefill ‘Biden’ twice as often as it

did ‘Trump.’”118

At least one instance of a large and inexplicable vote switching and vote surge in favor of Joe

Biden took place in Antrim County, Michigan – and it is associated with the controversial aforementioned Dominion-Smartmatic voting machine hardware-software combo.119 In this Republican stronghold, 6,000 votes were initially, and incorrectly, counted for Joe Biden. The resulting vote totals were contrary to voter registration and historical patterns and therefore raised eyebrows. When a check was done, it was discovered that the 6,000 votes were actually for Donald J. Trump. A subsequent forensic audit of the Antrim County vote tabulation found that the Dominion system had an astonishing error rate of 68 percent.120 By way of comparison, the Federal Election Committee requires that election systems must have an error rate no larger than 0.0008 percent.121 Perhaps even more troubling given concerns over hackers and Dominion’s alleged ties to bad foreign actors, the records that would have allowed the detection of remote internet access went missing from the Antrim County system. This was in direct violation of Michigan state law,122

which requires retention of voting records for 22 months -- such information was in place for previous election years, but not this election. At the very least, the results of this audit indicates the need for further investigation of the Dominion system across other states in the country.

24

In Georgia, there were numerous "glitches" with the Dominion machines where the results would change. The most notable of these changes was a 20,000 vote surge for Biden and 1,000 vote decrease for Trump.123

VIII. Statistical Anomalies in the Six Battleground States

The 2020 presidential election appears to feature at least four types of statistical anomalies that raise troubling questions. Table 8 illustrates the incidence of these statistical anomalies across the six battleground states. As you can see from the table, Wisconsin and Georgia are characterized by the highest degree of statistical anomalies, with three of the four anomalies present. Nevada and Arizona show two anomalies present while Michigan has at least one. Let’s take a more granular look now at each of these types of statistical anomalies.

Table 8: Statistical Anomalies in the Battleground States

Dramatic Changes in Mail-in and Absentee Ballot Rejection Rates from Previous Elections It is routine across the 50 states for mail-in-and absentee ballots to be rejected for any number of reasons. These reasons may include: the lack of a signature or adequate signature match, a late arrival past a deadline,124 the lack of an external envelope that verifies voter-identification (a naked ballot),125 or if voters provide inaccurate or incomplete information on the ballots.126 In the 2020 presidential race, Joe Biden received a disproportionately high percentage of the mail-in and absentee ballots. Perhaps not coincidentally, we saw a dramatic fall in rejection rates in Pennsylvania, Nevada, and especially Georgia.

25

For example, in Nevada, the overall rejection rate dropped from 1.6%127 in 2016 to 0.58% in 2020.128 In Pennsylvania, the 2016 rejection rate of 1.0%129 dropped to virtually nothing at 0.28%.130 The biggest fall in the overall absentee ballot rejection rate came, however, in Georgia. Its rejection rate fell from 6.8%131 in 2016 to a mere 0.34%132 in 2020. These dramatically lower rejection rates point to a conscious effort by Democrat election officials across these key battleground states to subject mail-in and absentee ballots to a lower level of scrutiny. That this kind of government conduct and gaming of our election system may have contributed to tipping the scales in favor of Joe Biden can be illustrated in this simple calculation: In the 2020 race, Georgia election officials received 1,320,154 mail-in and absentee ballots. If these ballots had been rejected at the 2016 rate of 6.8% instead of the 2020 rate of 0.34%, there would have been 81,321 ballots rejected instead of the 4,489 ballots that were actually rejected. Under the conservative assumption that 60% of these mail-in and absentee ballots went to Joe Biden,133 this dramatic fall in the rejection rate provided Joe Biden with an additional 16,264 votes. That’s more than the margin of the alleged Biden victory in Georgia. Excessively High Voter Turnout (at times exceeding 100%) When there are more ballots cast than registered or eligible voters, fraud has likely taken place. During the 2020 presidential election, excessively high voter turnout occurred across all six swing states. In analyzing this problem, it is important to distinguish between states that have same-day registration and those that don’t. States with same-day registration can plausibly have voter turnout that is higher than 100%. However, is impossible for that to happen in states without same-day registration without fraud having taken place. Consider, then, Arizona which does not allow same-day voter registration. According to testimony from an MIT-trained mathematician, Candidate Biden may have received a weighted 130% total of Democrat votes in Maricopa County to help him win the state due to an algorithm programmed into the Dominion voting machines used there.134 Although Michigan does allow same-voter registration, voter turnout was still abnormally high. Here again, the Dominion voting system has been implicated. To wit: Cybersecurity executive and former NASA analyst, Russ Ramsland, testified that in Wayne County, Michigan, where Dominion Voting Systems equipment was used, 46 out of 47 precincts in the county displayed greater than a 96% voter turnout. 25 out of those precincts showed a 100% voter turnout.135

26

Wisconsin, which also allows same-day voter registration, also reported abnormally high voter turnout when compared to 2016 numbers. For example, Milwaukee reported a record 84% voter turnout during the 2020 presidential election versus 75% in 2016.136 Of the city’s 327 voting wards, 90 reported a turnout of greater than 90%.137 Statistically Improbable Vote Totals Based on Party Registration and Historical Patterns The 2020 presidential election was characterized by strong partisan voting patterns consistent with historical patterns. As a rule, heavily Republican jurisdictions voted heavily for President Trump and heavily Democrat jurisdictions voted heavily for Joe Biden. In some cases, however, there were instances where these partisan and historical patterns were violated. It is precisely in such instances where either outright fraud or machine inaccuracies or manipulations are most likely to be operative. As one example of such statistically improbable vote totals, there are the results in Arizona’s Fifth Congressional District. In one precinct in the suburb of Queen Creek, the vote percent for President Trump dropped dramatically relative to 2016, from 67.4 to 58.5 percent.138 This was attributed to an “unusually high” number of duplicate ballots.139 Unusual Vote Surges Several unusual vote surges took place in the very early hours of the morning of November 4th in Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. An analysis conducted by the Voter Integrity Project of The New York Times publicly reported data on Election Day that showed several vote “spikes” that were unusually large in size with unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratios. Such spikes or surges could well indicate that fraudulent ballots had been counted. In Georgia, for example, an update at 1:34 AM on November 4th showed 136,155 additional ballots cast for Joe Biden, and 29,115 additional votes cast for President Trump.140 An update in Michigan at 3:50 AM on November 4th showed an update of 54,497 additional votes cast for Joe Biden, and 4,718 votes cast for President Trump.141 And an update in Wisconsin at 3:42 AM on November 4th showed 143,379 additional ballots cast for Joe Biden, and 25,163 votes cast for President Trump.142

27

IX. A State-By-State Analysis and Signal Failure of Our Legislative and Judicial Branches

All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.

– Anna Karenina, by Leo Tolstoy

It should be clear at this point that all six battleground states suffer from most or all of the six dimensions of election irregularities documented in this report. However, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, it is also true that each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way. That is, each battleground state may be characterized by a unique mix of issues that, impressionistically, might be considered “most important” in swinging that state for Joe Biden. Consider Arizona, a state with the lowest alleged Biden victory margin at 10,457 votes. This is a state with statistically improbable high voter turnouts in Maricopa and Pima counties; widespread ballot mishandling; and 1.6 million mail-in ballots (which tended towards Biden) subjected to much lower standards of certification and ID verification than in-person voters (who tended towards Trump). In Georgia, the alleged Biden victory margin was just 11,779 votes. What perhaps jumps out most in the Peach State is the illegal Consent Decree that effectively gutted the signature match requirements for millions of mail-in ballots. There is also the quite unresolved fake ballot manufacturing matter of the roughly 100,000 ballots that were mysteriously pulled, in the dead of night, out from underneath tables and expeditiously tabulated. Of course, we saw that Georgia’s electoral version of a Three-card Monte sleight-of-hand led to a strong Biden vote surge. Of all of the six battleground states which suffered from numerous observer and poll watcher abuses, Michigan must rank as “first among equals.” With its “board up the windows” and “rough up the observers” tactics, Detroit in Wayne County was the center of this “see no evil” universe. When two local Republican officials tried to withhold certification of the votes in this county for practices such as these and demanded an audit, they were subject to extreme intimidation and “doxing” and quickly capitulated.143 As for Nevada, this is a state likewise with a very narrow alleged victory margin for Joe Biden – 33,596 votes. Here, voting machine irregularities associated with the Agilis machine have called into question as many as 130,000 votes. There may also be an unusually large number of ballots cast by out-of-state voters and others who did not meet residency requirements. Of course, the brazen bribery of Native Americans to vote for Joe Biden is a dark stain on the state and the Democrat Party.144 In Pennsylvania, an equally brazen Democrat Secretary of State issued illegal guidance for the acceptance of naked ballots and ignored direction from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to fix the matter. She allowed ballots to be illegally cured in contravention of state law and pushed the legal envelope for accepting ballots after Election Day.

28

In the Keystone State, and as with Georgia’s Three-card Monte, shuffle fake ballots out from underneath a table scandal, there is also the equally unresolved matter of possible fake ballot manufacturing. Recall, here, the testimony of a truck driver who swears he picked up as many as 100,000 fake manufactured ballots in New York and delivered them to Pennsylvania. Both the tractor-trailer and the ballots involved remain unaccounted for – and what might have been in this tractor-trailer were enough ballots alone to swing the election to Joe Biden. Finally, in Wisconsin, the mother of all contestable process fouls is arguably that of the roughly 170,000 mail-in ballots entering the tabulation process under the guise of absentee ballots in clear violation of state law. That’s more than eight times the number of ballots of the alleged Biden victory margin of 20,682 votes. In Wisconsin, there is likewise the large-scale abuse associated with an overly expansive definition of “indefinitely confined voters.” Recall here that the increment of new indefinitely confined voters in the 2020 election in Wisconsin was more than five times the alleged Biden victory margin. **** While Democrat Party government officials cheated and gamed the electoral process across all six battleground states, many Republican government officials – from governors and state legislators to judges – did little or nothing to stand in their way. Consider that the Republican Party controls both chambers of the State Legislatures in five of the six battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.145 These State Legislatures clearly have both the power and the opportunity to investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities presented in this report. Yet, wilting under intense political pressure, these politicians have failed in their Constitutional duties and responsibilities to do so – and thereby failed both their states and this nation as well as their party. The same can be said for the Republican governors in two of the six battleground states – Arizona and Georgia. Both Arizona’s Doug Ducey and Georgia’s Brian Kemp have cowered in their Governor’s mansions and effectively sat on their hands while their states have wallowed in election irregularities. The judicial branch of the American government should be the final backstop for the kind of issues examined in this report. Yet both our State courts and Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have failed the American people in refusing to properly adjudicate the election irregularities that have come before them. Their failures likewise pose a great risk to the American Republic.

29

Concluding Observations

From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the patterns of election irregularities observed in this report are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election, then to strategically game the election process in such a way as to unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket. A major part of this “stuff the ballot box” strategy has been aptly summarized in a complaint filed before the US Supreme Court by the State of Texas:

Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, [Democrat] government officials [in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin] usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes. They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity.146

According to the Texas complaint – which the Supreme Court sadly refused to hear – the goal of this strategy was to flood the battleground states “with millions of ballots to be sent through the mails, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody.” At the same time, Democrat government officials also sought to “weaken the strongest security measures protecting the integrity of the vote signature verification and witness requirements.”147 The findings of the assessment conducted in this report are consistent with the Texas complaint. Key takeaways include:

The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities uncovered in this report are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim that there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities.

The ballots that have come into question because of the identified election irregularities are

more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.

While all six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election

irregularities, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather

than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.

30

In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth. This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and the stability of our political system and Republic.

Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a

Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election. If this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people.

The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities

assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches.

o Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia together with Republican majorities

in both chambers of the State Legislatures of five of the six battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin148 – have had both the power and the opportunity to investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities presented in this report. Yet, wilting under intense political pressure, these politicians have failed in their Constitutional duties and responsibilities to do so – and thereby failed both their states and this nation as well as their party.

o Both State courts and Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have failed the

American people in refusing to appropriately adjudicate the election irregularities that have come before them. Their failures pose a great risk to the American Republic.

If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and

thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again – with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.

31

ENDNOTES

1 All witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits or declarations who are referenced in this report but whose names are not referenced in the public record, e.g., a court case, are referred to as “Jane Doe” or “John Doe” based on gender. This has been done to ensure their safety and security.

2 Ballotopedia, “Partisan composition of state legislatures,” December 4, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures 3 Bump, Philip. “The two states that almost always predict which candidate is headed for defeat,” The Washington Post, 7 September 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/07/the-two-states-that-almost-always-predict-which-candidate-is-headed-for-defeat/ *The two Democrat candidate exceptions were John F. Kennedy in 1960 and Bill Clinton in 1992. 4 Williams, Pete. "Trump's election fight includes over 50 lawsuits. It's not going well.” NBC News, November 23, 2020. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-s-election-fight-includes-over-30-lawsuits-it-s-n1248289 5 All witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits and declarations referenced in this report are referred to as “Jane Doe” and “John Doe” based on gender, in order to ensure their safety and security. 6 Bannon, Steve, War Room Pandemic, https://pandemic.warroom.org/ 7 Solomon, John, Just the News, https://justthenews.com/john-solomon 8 Kassam, Raheem, National Pulse, https://americasvoice.news/the-national-pulse/ 9 Newsmax, https://www.newsmax.com/ 10 One America News Network, https://www.oann.com/ 11“Most Say Mail-In Voting Worked, But 47% Say Fraud Likely.” Rasmussen Reports, December 7, 2020. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/most_say_mail_in_voting_worked_but_47_say_fraud_likely 12 Legal Information Institute, “Bribery,” Cornell University, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bribery 13 Bedard, Paul, “Pro-Biden effort offered Native Americans $25-$500 Visa gift cards and jewelry to vote,” Washington Examiner, December 14, 2020. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/pro-biden-effort-offered-native-americans-25-500-visa-gift-cards-jewelry-to-vote 14 Pentochoukov, Ivan, “Illegal Money-for-Votes Raffles Conducted in Several States in 2020 Election,” Epoch Times, December 2, 2020. https://www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-2020-election_3598915.html 15 Morgan, Jessy. Testimony. “A truck driver with USPS says he was suspicious of his cargo load of 288,000 completed ballots.” December 1, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0xaA4dYsbQ 16 Declaration of John Doe, Delaware County Pennsylvania, November 9, 2020. 17 Bedard, Paul, “20 House Republicans demand Barr investigate ‘suitcases’ of ballots in Georgia,” The Washington Examiner, December 4, 2020. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/20-house-gop-demand-ag-barr-investigate-suitcases-of-ballots-in-georgia 18 “Trump Campaign lawyers present video 'evidence' of ballot fraud,” Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, December 4, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ0xDWhWUxk Real American Politics, December 4, 2020. https://twitter.com/RealAPolitics/status/1334754269052997635?s=20 19See, for example: Weber, Peter, “Georgia's top election investigator debunks a vote fraud conspiracy involving 'suitcases' of ballots, a urinal,” December 7, 2020. https://news.yahoo.com/georgias-top-election-investigator-debunks-115236191.html 20 In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey, December 2, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Bower-Complaint-AZ.pdf 21 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Cobb County, Georgia, November 12, 2020. 22 Declaration of Jane Doe, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, Nov 7, 2020 23 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Trump lawsuit highlights indefinitely confined voter increase,” https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-trump-lawsuit-highlights-indefinitely-confined-voter-increase/ 24 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Some indefinitely confined voters are not indefinitely confined,” https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-some-indefinitely-confined-voters-are-not-indefinitely-confined/ 25 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Some indefinitely confined voters are not indefinitely confined,” https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-some-indefinitely-confined-voters-are-not-indefinitely-confined/

32

26 WisGOP, “WisGOP: Trump lawsuit highlights indefinitely confined voter increase,” https://www.wispolitics.com/2020/wisgop-trump-lawsuit-highlights-indefinitely-confined-voter-increase/ 27 Legal Information Institute, “18 U.S. Code § 611.Voting by aliens,” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611 28 The Superior Court Of Fulton County State Of Georgia, Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v.-Raffensperger.pdf 29 In the Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia, November 30, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020-11-30-Verified-Complaint.pdf 30 Declaration of Jane Doe, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, November 8, 2020. 31 In the First Judicial District Court Carson City, Nevada Jesse Law v. Judith Whitmer, November 17, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/nov-17-doc-2.pdf 32 Declaration of John Doe, Las Vegas, Nevada, November 22, 2020. 33 “Rudy Giuliani claims 8,000 dead people voted in election in Pennsylvania,” November 25, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_VUkB2jAcg See Also “Pennsylvania Senate Republican Lawmaker Hearing Transcript on 2020 Election,” Rev, November 26, 2020. https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/pennsylvania-senate-republican-lawmaker-hearing-transcript-on-2020-election 34 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Oakland County, Michigan, November 11, 2020. 35 Declaration of John Doe, Clark County, Nevada, November 7, 2020. 36 In the Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia, Paul Andrew Boland v Brad Raffensperger, November 29, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020-11-30-Verified-Complaint.pdf 37 Statement of John Doe, Las Vegas, Nevada, November 20, 2020. 38 Declaration of Jane Doe, Wisconsin, November 12, 2020. 39 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Washtenaw County, Michigan, November 9, 2020. 40 Declaration of Jane Doe, Northampton County, November 8, 2020. 41 Declaration of John Doe, Philadelphia County, November 14, 2020. 42 Declaration of Jane Doe, Northhampton County, Pennsylvania, November 7, 2020. 43 Affidavit of John Doe, Michigan, November 10, 2020. 44 Declaration of Jane Doe, Clark County, November 8, 2020. 45 Ballotopedia, “How do election workers match signatures? (2020),” https://ballotpedia.org/How_do_election_workers_match_signatures%3F_(2020) 46Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. (“DPG”), the DSCC, and the DCCC, Compromise Settlement and Release, March 6, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/07/GA-Settlement-1.pdf 47Petition for Writ of Madamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, “Daniel Rodimer v. Joseph Gloria, November 19, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Rodimer-v-Gloria_A-20-825130-W_Writ-of-Mandamus.pdf 48 In the First Judicial District Court Carson City, Nevada Jesse Law v. Judith Whitmer, November 17, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/nov-17-doc-2.pdf 49 In the United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin Milwaukee Division, Donald J. Trump v. the Wisconsin Elections Commission, December 2, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v-WEC-EDWI.pdf 50 Ballotopedia, “Pennsylvania Secretary of State,” https://ballotpedia.org/Pennsylvania_Secretary_of_State 51 The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Kathy Boockvar et al, November, 18 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.169.0.pdf 52 The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Kathy Boockvar et al, November, 18 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.169.0.pdf 53 The Elections Assistance Commission, “Ballot Building,” https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/Chapter_5_Ballot_Building.pdf 54 Harris, Bev, “About Chain of Custody,” Election Watch, February 16, 2016. https://blackboxvoting.org/about-chain-of-custody/ 55 Declaration of Jane Doe, Pennsylvania, November 7, 2020. Northhampton County. 56 Declaration of John Doe, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, November 7, 2020. (3 Pictures, 2 Videos)

33

57 In the Supreme Court of the United States, The State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin, December 7, 2020. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf 58 Chaitin, Daniel, “Lindsey Graham: Possible ballot harvesting in Pennsylvania involving 25,000 nursing home residents,” Microsoft News, November 10, 2020. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lindsey-graham-possible-ballot-harvesting-in-pennsylvania-involving-25-000-nursing-home-residents/ar-BB1aR3R4 59 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Brookfield, Wisconsin, November 10, 2020. 60 Declaration of John Doe, Brown County, November 11, 2020. 61 Greenberg, Jay, “Dominion Technician Exposed as Anti-Trump Ex-Kamala Harris Worker,” December 1, 2020. https://neonnettle.com/news/13425-dominion-technician-exposed-as-anti-trump-ex-kamala-harris-worker 62 Declaration of Jane Doe, Waukesha County, Wisconsin, November 11, 2020. 63 “ ‘USPS contractor: "Something profoundly wrong occurred in Wisconsin during the presidential election’ " December 1, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRUvP6cbtZk&feature=youtu.be&t=69 See also Van Brugen, Isabel, “Wisconsin USPS Subcontractor Alleges Backdating of Tens of Thousands of Mail-In Ballots,” December 2, 2020. https://www.theepochtimes.com/wisconsin-usps-subcontractor-alleges-backdating-of-tens-of-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots_3601580.html 64 State of Michigan Judicial District, Cheryl A. Constantino and David A. Kallman v. City of Detroit, November 8, 2020. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20403147/wayne-county-michigan-election-fraud-lawsuit.pdf 65 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Oakland County, Michigan November 10, 2020. 66 Declaration of John Doe, Cobb County, Georgia, November 5, 2020. 67 Affidavit John Doe, Eagle County, Colorado November 12, 2020. 68 The Declaration of John McBlain, Esquire. See, The Supreme Court of the United States, State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin, December 7, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf 69 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Gwinnett County, Georgia, November 12, 2020. 70 Affidavit John Doe, Waukesha County, Wisconsin, November 10, 2020. 71 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Clark County, Nevada, November 10, 2020. 72The Declaration of John McBlain, Esquire. See, The Supreme Court of the United States, State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin, December 7, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf 73 Affidavit of John Doe, November 10, 2020, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. 74 The Declaration of John McBlain, Esquire. See, The Supreme Court of the United States, State of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin, December 7, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf 75 The Superior Court Of Fulton County State Of Georgia, Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v.-Raffensperger.pdf 76 Liptak, Adam, “Supreme Court Allows Longer Deadline for Absentee Ballots in Pennsylvania and North Carolina,” New York Times, October 28, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/supreme-court-pennsylvania-north-carolina-absentee-ballots.html 77 Southwick, Ron, “Pa. received 10,000 ballots after polls closed on Election Day,” PennLive, Nov10, 2020. https://www.pennlive.com/elections/2020/11/pa-received-10000-late-ballots-that-arrived-after-polls-closed-on-election-day.html 78 Declaration of Jane Doe, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, November 7, 2020. 79 The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, “Donald J. Trump et al v. Anthony Evers et al” December 1, 2020. https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/wisconsin-filing-12-1-20_compressed.pdf 80 Declaration of Jane Doe, Oak Creek, Wisconsin, November 11, 2020. 81 The Superior Court Of Fulton County State Of Georgia, Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v.-Raffensperger.pdf 82 Declaration of John Doe, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, November 7, 2020. 83 Declaration of John Doe, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, November 9, 2020. 84 Declaration of John Doe, Ingham County, Michigan, November 11, 2020. 85 Declaration of Jane Doe, Ingham County, Michigan, November 11, 2020.

34

86 Declaration of Jane Doe, Wheaton, Illinois, November 9, 2020. 87 “Cure period of absentee and mail-in ballots,” Ballotpedia, Accessed on December 14, 20. https://ballotpedia.org/Cure_period_for_absentee_and_mail-in_ballots 88 “Cure period of absentee and mail-in ballots,” Ballotpedia, Accessed on December 14, 20. https://ballotpedia.org/Cure_period_for_absentee_and_mail-in_ballots 89 Declaration of Jane Doe, Centre County, Pennsylvania, November 11, 2020. 90 The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Kathy Boockvar et al, November 18, 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.169.0.pdf 91 The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Donald J. Trump for President et al v. Kathy Boockvar et al, November 18, 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.169.0.pdf 92 Declaration of Bartholomew W. and Jean B. W., Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, November 16, 2020. See Also https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/11/11/fact-check-republicans-claim-wisconsin-clerks-illegally-altered-ballots/6234023002/ 93 Declaration of John Doe, Delaware County Pennsylvania, November 9, 2020. 94 State of Michigan Court of Appeals, “Donald J. Trump for President et. al v. Jocelyn Benson,” November 30, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Trump-brief-FINAL.pdf 95 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Washtenaw County, Michigan, November 9, 2020. 96 Cornell University, “Equal Protection,” Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/equal_protection 97 Lai, Jonathan et al, “ Joe Biden won 3 of every 4 mail ballots in Pennsylvania. Trump won 2 of 3 votes cast in person. What does that mean for the future?” The Philadelphia Inquirer, https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/mail-ballots-pennsylvania-election-trump-biden-20201119.html 98 Declaration of John Doe, County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, November 11, 2020 99 Blair County, Berks County, Lancaster County, Carbon County, Clinton County, Lycoming County, Dauphoin County, and Perry County. 100 Joseph D. Hamm v. Kathy Boockvar, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, November 3, 2020. http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7723/file-10362.pdf?cb=f327ff 101 Secretary of State of Arizona, “Voters have a limited amount of time to correct certain ballot issues,” November 9, 2020. https://azsos.gov/about-office/media-center/press-releases/1248 102 In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tyler Bowyer et al v.. Doug Ducey, December 2, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Bower-Complaint-AZ.pdf 103 National Conference of State Legislatures, “Poll Watchers and Challengers,” October 1, 2020. https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/poll-watcher-qualifications.aspx 104 National Conference of State Legislatures, “Poll Watchers and Challengers,” October 1, 2020. https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/poll-watcher-qualifications.aspx 105 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Rockdale County, Georgia, November 2020. 106 Declaration of John Doe, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November 8, 2020. 107 Affidavit of Jane Doe, Brookfield, Wisconsin, November 10, 2020. 108 Ballotopedia, “Voting Equipment and Methods by State,” https://ballotpedia.org/Voting_methods_and_equipment_by_state 109 Ballotopedia, “Voting Equipment and Methods by State,” https://ballotpedia.org/Voting_methods_and_equipment_by_state 110 Dominion Voting Systems, “About,” https://www.dominionvoting.com/about/ 111 Varnona, Frank “2020 Stolen Election by Dominion Voter Systems – Hammer & Scorecard,” Conservative Business Journal, https://www.conservativebusinessjournal.com/2020-stolen-election-hammer-and-scorecard/ 112 Clinton Foundation, “The Delian Project,” https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative/commitments/delian-project-democracy-through-technology 113 For example, the Chairman of Smartmatic, Mark Malloch-Brown, is on the board of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. Open Society Foundation, “Leadership,” https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/who-we-are/leadership/mark-malloch-brown 114 The First Judicial Court in Carson City, Nevada, “Jesse Law et al v. Judith Whitmer et al,” November 17, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/nov-17-doc-2.pdf 115 The First Judicial Court in Carson City, Nevada, “Jesse Law et al v. Judith Whitmer et al,” November 17, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/nov-17-doc-2.pdf

35

116 “In violation of Nevada law, the Clark County Election Department allows the Agilis machine to solely verify 30% of the signatures accompanying the mail-in ballots without ever having humanize inspect those signatures.” 117 In the Superior Court of Arizona in and For the County of Maricopa, “Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson et al,” November 24, 2020. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf 118 In the Superior Court of Arizona in and For the County of Maricopa, “Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson et al,” November 24, 2020. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf 119 Affidavit of John Doe, Dallas County, Texas. November 17, 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf 120 Ramsland Jr., Russell. “Antrim Michigan Forensics Report.” William Bailey v. Antrim County, Michigan, December 13, 2020. https://depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf 121 “Excerpts from the 2002 FEC Voting System Standards – 3.2.1 Accuracy Requirements.” Michigan Secretary of State. https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1583-130621--,00.html 122 “Document Retention Schedule.” Michigan Bureau of Elections, May 2019. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Document_Retention_Schedule_412493_7.pdf 123 Sperry, Paul. “Georgia voting irregularities: The curious case of Biden’s 20,000-vote surge.” The Citizen, November 15,2020. https://thecitizen.com/2020/11/15/georgia-voting-irregularities-the-curious-case-of-bidens-20000-vote-surge/ 124 Parks, Miles, “Why Some Mail-In Ballots Are Rejected As Invalid,” NPR, October 4, 2020. https://www.npr.org/2020/10/04/920175418/why-some-mail-in-ballots-are-rejected-as-invalid 125 Livingston, Doug, “Why absentee ballots get rejected, and how to make yours count,” USA Today, September 21, 2020. https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/news/2020/09/21/why-absentee-ballots-rejected-presidential-and-other-elections/3486553001/ 126 Livingston, Doug, “Why absentee ballots get rejected, and how to make yours count,” USA Today, September 21, 2020. https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/news/2020/09/21/why-absentee-ballots-rejected-presidential-and-other-elections/3486553001/ 127 Election Assistance Commission, “The Election Administration and Voting Survey; A Report to the United States Congress,” 2016. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/2016_EAVS_Comprehensive_Report.pdf 128 Ballotopedia, “Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots,” December 11, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_Analysis_of_rejected_ballots See Also Office of Nevada Secretary of State Barbara K. Cegavske, “2020 General Election Turnout Mail Ballot Information,” https://www.nvsos.gov/sos/home/showdocument?id=9058 129 Election Assistance Commission, “The Election Administration and Voting Survey; A Report to the United States Congress,” 2016. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/2016_EAVS_Comprehensive_Report.pdf 130 Ballotopedia, “Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots,” December 11, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_Analysis_of_rejected_ballots See Also U.S. Elections Project, “Pennsylvania Early Voting Statistics,” November 20, 2020. https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/PA.html 131 Election Assistance Commission, “The Election Administration and Voting Survey; A Report to the United States Congress,” 2016. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/2016_EAVS_Comprehensive_Report.pdf 132 The Superior Court Of Fulton County State Of Georgia, Trump v. Raffensperger, December 4, 2020. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Trump-v.-Raffensperger.pdf 133 For example, in Pennsylvania, 3 out of every 4 absentee/mail-in ballots went to Joe Biden https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/mail-ballots-pennsylvania-election-trump-biden-20201119.html And in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 84% of absentee/mail-in ballots went to Joe Biden https://www.tmj4.com/news/election-2020/no-joe-biden-did-not-get-100-percent-of-all-milwaukee-absentee-ballots 134 Heine, Debra,“Mathematician Says Biden May Have Received 130 Percent of the Democrat Vote in Maricopa County, Arizona,” December 2, 2020. https://themichiganstar.com/2020/12/02/mathematician-says-biden-may-have-received-130-percent-of-the-democrat-vote-in-maricopa-county-arizona/ 135 Affidavit of Russel R., Dallas County, Texas. November 17, 2020. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf

36

136 Milwaukee City Wire News Service,“Analysis: Five Milwaukee wards report 89% turnout in 2020 presidential vote; Biden nets 146K votes in city,” November 4, 2020. https://mkecitywire.com/stories/564495243-analysis-seven-milwaukee-wards-report-more-2020-presidential-votes-than-registered-voters-biden-nets-146k-votes-in-city 137 Milwaukee City Wire News Service,“Analysis: Five Milwaukee wards report 89% turnout in 2020 presidential vote; Biden nets 146K votes in city,” November 4, 2020. https://mkecitywire.com/stories/564495243-analysis-seven-milwaukee-wards-report-more-2020-presidential-votes-than-registered-voters-biden-nets-146k-votes-in-city 138 Duda, Jeremy. “GOP lawsuit questions 'duplicate' ballots in Queen Creek,” San Tan Valley Sentinel, November 27, 2020. https://www.pinalcentral.com/san_tan_valley_sentinel/local_news/gop-lawsuit-questions-duplicate-ballots-in-queen-creek/article_ee9557d0-97e4-53e9-a269-5beb4b64370a.html 139 In the Superior Court of Arizona in and For the County of Maricopa, Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson et al, November 24, 2020. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20417265/ward-v-jackson-complaint-and-petition-for-discovery.pdf 140 Voter Integrity Project, “Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020,” November 24, 2020. https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020 141 Voter Integrity Project, “Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020,” November 24, 2020. https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020 142 Voter Integrity Project, “Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020,” November 24, 2020. https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020 143 News Now, “Michigan Republican Electors Harassed And Forced To Change Vote,” November 18, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW1YzQY_1Ro Dowling, M. “Michigan’s largest county refuses to certify the election – Update, evil wins,” Independent Sentinel, November 17, 2020. https://www.independentsentinel.com/michigans-largest-county-refuses-to-certify-the-election/ See Also Institute for Political Economy, “Wayne County Michigan Withdraws Election Certification, Security Expert Concludes Michigan Was Stolen.” https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2105758771365/wayne-county-michigan-withdraws-election-certification-security-expert-concludes-michigan-was-stolen 144 Pentchoukov, Ivan, “Illegal Money-For-Votes Raffles Conducted in Several States in 2020 Election,” December 1, 2020. https://www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-2020-election_3598915.html 145 Ballotopedia, “Partisan composition of state legislatures,” December 4, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures 146 State of Texas v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin, “Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint,” December 7, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf pg. 1 147 State of Texas v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin, “Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint,” December 7, 2020. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf pg. 1 148Ballotopedia, “Partisan composition of state legislatures,” December 4, 2020. https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures

An Open Letter from America

From: Every Legal Vote Coalition - 11 Dec 2020

Subject: DO YOUR JOB! Restore Confidence America’s Election System

To: William Barr / Jeffrey Rosen, Attorney General of the United States;CC: Those with a DUTY to Protect U.S. Elections;

Those with a DUTY to Investigate Crime & Injustice

Prior to the November 3, 2020 elections, the American people were repeatedly assured via press releases and video recordings that those officials in Washington and around the nation responsible for election integrity in states across the country would make certain that this year’s balloting was secure. Unfortunately, the American people are now persuaded that the presidential race and perhaps others were, instead, marred by widespread and material fraud, irregularities, crime and foreign influence.

The attached compilation reflects the e forts of our Every Legal Vote citizens’ initiative to facilitate the reporting of fraud witnessed during the election. It offers ample proof of that conclusion and makes absolutely mandatory thorough and immediate investigations by federal and state-level law enforcement.

Over the past month our website, EveryLegalVote.com, has received more than thirty-five hundred such reports and personal testimonies from those around America who witnessed fraud and crime, particularly in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia.

Such evidence includes the following:

• Reports of public officials breaking the law by campaigning at polling locations, of crowds bullying voters on election day and people voting more than once.

• Video footage of criminal acts in Georgia with poll workers pulling out hidden boxes of ballots to be counted illegally in the dark of night and without poll watchers present.

• Votes in states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania by those who appear to be deceased.

• Several states taking steps to delete and destroy data, including ballot envelopes shredded contrary to the Supreme Court directive in Pennsylvania and computer anomalies in Georgia. Of course, willful destruction and manipulation of evidence violates multiple federal statutes.

• We are seeing intimidating and even violent threats and physical harm committed against election fraud witnesses. For example, after hearings in Michigan, an elected official doxed these bravewitnesses and even recorded a video calling on “soldiers” to “make them pay.”

This is unacceptable, un-American and a federal crime.

• Numerous reports from expert witnesses testifying under oath have established that voting machines such as Dominion’s have built-in vulnerabilities, were connected to the internet, are vulnerable to hacking and were overseen by employees with little oversight. Company personnel allegedly briefed state officials on how to change vote tallies and a Dominion officia reportedly stated prior to the election that he had “made f***ing sure’ that ‘Trump’s not gonna win.”.

• There appears to be growing evidence of foreign interference including reports of foreign printing and distribution of U.S. election ballots, voter registration information from Nevada being sent to Pakistan, and extensive influence operations conducted by Communist China via its penetration ofSilicon Valley and Wall Street.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 1

• Unaccountable individuals with foreign ties reportedly also intervened. For example, George Soros has a long history of funding projects aimed at undermining vote integrity in the United States and elsewhere around the world and his Open Society Foundation and philanthropy seems to have been active in this year’s election.

Taken together, such evidence refutes official statements to the e fect that this election was the most secure in American history and that any fraud seen to date has not been on a scale that could have resulted in a different outcome in the election. The same applies to media accounts that insist there has been no substantive fraud identified and that the election has been secure from foreign interference.

To help clarify the facts and correct widespread disinformation in addition to compiling citizens’ reports of fraud, Every Legal Vote sponsored a televised “Election Fraud Truth Summit” on December 8, 2020. It featured powerful interviews with an array of election integrity experts, attorneys, an internationally renowned statistician and forensic fraud-detectors. The summit’s unmistakable conclusion is that our sacred right to vote in free and fair elections was successfully attacked in the 2020 election. Victims of fraud have subsequently been denied due process and in some cases put at risk. Perpetrators of such fraud seem to be disappearing, “lawyering up” and/or destroying evidence. Media and social media companies are censoring the truth. And all the while, the urgently needed investigations and, where appropriate prosecutions, seem not to be going anywhere.

While the Every Legal Vote Coalition strongly commends the state attorneys general who have joined forces to challenge the unconstitutional actions taken in the course of this election by some states, we should not have to depend on the Supreme Court to rectify these wrongs. More must be done now – at the Federal and State levels – to investigate the electoral fraud and other misconduct that accompanied those actions – and thereby prevent any repetition of these mortal threats to our representative form of government.

General Barr, your department and its counterparts in the states possess the formal authorities and tools needed to root out such criminal activity and foreign interference. You have the power to arrest and prosecute those who perpetrate it. In particular, General, you have been empowered with specific authorities underthe Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election dated September 12, 2018.

We, therefore, urge you and every one of those copied on this open letter in the strongest possible terms: DO YOUR JOB.

Our coalition stands ready to support you in assuring that every legal vote is counted in the presidential election of 2020 and down ballot and that those not legally cast are not counted. We will work with your respective offices and investigators to ensure that your vital work is informed by ours and, most especiall , that the testimony of Americans who have asked us to ensure that their voices are heard is included and that equal justice under law prevails.

Respectfully,

Every Legal Vote Coalition

CC: Jeffrey A. Rosen, Deputy Attorney General John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General for National Security Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Director and Chief Counsel, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Daniel Kahn, Acting Chief, Fraud Section

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 2

Joseph Beemsterboer, Acting Principal Deputy Chief, Fraud SectionAlbert Stieglitz, Acting Senior Deputy Chief, Fraud SectionChristopher Cestaro, Chief, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) UnitEric S. Dreiband, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division

Michael Bailey, U.S. Attorney, District of ArizonaByung J. Pak, U.S. Attorney, Northern District of GeorgiaBobby L. Christine, U.S. Attorney, Southern District of GeorgiaMatthew Schneider, U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of MichiganAndrew B. Birge, U.S. Attorney, Western District of MichiganNicholas A. Trutanich, U.S. Attorney, District of NevadaWilliam M. McSwain, U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of PennsylvaniaScott W. Brady, U.S. Attorney, Western District of PennsylvaniaMatthew D. Krueger, U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of WisconsinScott C. Blader, U.S. Attorney, Western District of Wisconsin

Christopher Wray, Director, FBIDavid Bowdich, Deputy Director, FBIPaul Abbate, Associate Deputy Director, FBIPaul B. Murphy, Chief of Staff, FBICatherine Bruno, Office of Integrity and Compliance, FBStuart Platt, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), FB John Brown, Executive Assistant Director, National Security Branch, FBI Alan E. Kohler, Jr., Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division, FBIStephen Laycock, Executive Assistant Director, Intelligence Branch, FBI Ryan T. Young, Directorate of Intelligence, FBITerry Wade, Executive Assistant Director, Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch, FBICharles Spencer, International Operations Division, FBI Calvin Shivers, Assistant Director, Criminal Investigative Division, FBIMatt Gorham, Cyber Division, FBIDarrin E. Jones, Executive Assistant Director, Science and Technology Branch, FBIMichael D. DeLeon, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, FBIBrian C. Turner, Operational Technology Division, FBIMichael Gavin, Executive Assistant Director, IT Branch, FBINathan Taylor, IT Applications and Data Division, FBIDean Phillips, IT Infrastructure Division, FBIGeorge P. Beach, II, Office of Partner Engagement, FBMichael Sullivan, Office of Private Secto , FBIJohn Selleck, Critical Incident Response Group, FBIRegina Thompson, Victim Services Division, FBI

Brandon Wales, Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA),Steven Harris, Deputy Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)Bob Kolasky, Assistant Director, National Risk Management Center (NRMC), CISAEmily Early, Chief of Staff, CISA

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 3

Matt Hartman, Assistant Director for Cybersecurity, CISAScott Breor, Assistant Director for Infrastructure Security, CISACountering Foreign Influence Task Force, CISA

General Paul M. Nakasone, Director, National Security Agency; Chief, Central Security ServiceGeorge C. Barnes, Deputy Director, National Security AgencyBrigadier General Douglas S. Coppinger, Deputy Chief, Central Security ServiceWendy Noble, Executive Director, National Security AgencyEarnest Green, Chief of Staff, National Security AgencyCommand Sergeant Major Sheryl D. Lyon, National Security Agency/Central Security ServiceRobert P. Storch, Inspector General, National Security Agency/Central Security Service

John Ratcliffe, Director of National IntelligenceNeil Wiley, Principal Executive, ODNILora Shiao, Chief Operating Office , ODNIBen Huebner, Chief, Civil Liberties, Privacy & Transparency, ODNIMatthew Kozma, Chief Information Office , ODNIWilliam R. Evanina, Director, The National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC)

US Postal Service Inspector General (OIG)Contract Fraud Investigations Division, USPSCyber Crimes Unit, OIG, USPSSpecial Inquiries Division, OIG, USPS

CC: Attorneys General of the 50 United States

Enclosed: (click on the Enclosure to be taken to that section)

Enclosure 1 - Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

Enclosure 2 - Check Your Vote Summary, including evidence of tens of thousands of deceased voters

Enclosure 3 - Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

Enclosure 4 - Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

Enclosure 5 - Ruby Freeman Bias & Alleged Criminal Activity

Enclosure 6 - “Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

Enclosure 7 - Plain language description of Dominion Election Fraud: “Not Rounding Errors”

Enclosure 8 - Open-Source Intel: Sample collection of articles on crime, fraud, and foreign influence

Enclosure 9 - Foreign Influence Example - Transcript of Remarks by Di Dongsheng of China

Enclosure 10 - Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Enclosure 11 - E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

Enclosure 12 - Joint Statement of ODNI, DOJ, FBI and DHS: Combating Foreign Influence in U.S. Elections, October 19, 201

Enclosure 13 - NEW 12-13-2020 Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 4

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 5

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 6

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 7

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 8

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 9

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 10

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 11

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 12

ENCLOSURE 1

Sample of Fraud Stories Submitted to EveryLegalVote.com from AZ & MI

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 13

Check Your Vote Summary, including proof of tens of thousands of deceased voters

Another group of citizen-researchers has created a resource that will assist law enforcement with investigating voter fraud: https://checkyourvote.org/

The website provides findings in Michigan such as

• 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 election and has also been found in one or more obituaries online. (Visit the link to check for yourself)

• 19,121 General Election Absentee Ballots with impossible issue, return, send and receive dates

The website’s findings in Pennsylvania were even more alarming

• 40,000 randomly checked voters above the age of 80 in Pennsylvania, that were registered for voting and have also been found in one or more obituaries online. Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 presidential election. (Visit the link to check for yourself)

• A Republican absentee ballot was 72% more likely to go missing than a Democrat absentee ballot.

• 27,663 absentee ballots that have been mailed to P.O. Boxes and then subsequently have been filledout and returned. 102 voters on this list were not registered for voting, yet casted a ballot.

• 29,112 General Election Absentee Ballots had impossible issue, return, send and receive dates.

• 1111 unique voters over 112 years old.

All personal information on this list is publicly available and has been obtained legally by concerned citizens. It is now available for law enforcement professionals to DO THEIR JOBS to investigate. We attach just a few pages of the Michigan data below so you can click on the hyperlinks and see the obituaries and the proof that votes were cast for these deceased persons. This is a MASSIVE amount of criminal fraud that MUST be investigated.

ENCLOSURE 2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 14

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 15

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 16

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 17

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 18

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 19

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 20

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 21

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 22

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 23

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 24

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 25

ENCLOSURE 3

Five States and The Election Irregularities and Issues - December 8, 2020

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 26

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 27

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 28

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 29

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 30

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 31

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 32

ENCLOSURE 4

Epoch Times Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 33

ENCLOSURE 5

Ruby Freeman Bias & Alleged Criminal Activity

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 34

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 35

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 36

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 37

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 38

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 39

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 40

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 41

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 42

ENCLOSURE 6

“Statistics IS Evidence” by Jay Valentine & National Academy of Sciences

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 43

ENCLOSURE 7

Plain language description of Dominion Election Fraud: “Not Rounding Errors”

NOT ROUNDING ERRORS: Reviewing Dominion for LegislatorsEveryLegalVote.com

A $100 wager: most Americans believe in common sense vote counting. We all imagine each candidate has a bucket, every vote is like a pebble being tossed into that bucket, and each vote represents a single citizen’s choice. The first democracy literally used urns and pebbles. After voting day, two Greek urns were emptied onto counting boards for tabulation and the winner was declared, in public, without dispute. Two plus two equals four; unless the data goes through a piece of software IP paid for by the social communist Hugo Chavez.

It will surprise many Americans and legislators to know that this transparent and normal expectation is not how our voting system currently works. Imagine if you mixed blue and red paint, and then tried to keep track of how many gallons of red paint are in the bucket by the color of the mixed paint. No competent data engineer would design the system this way as their first choice for vote counts

In most cases all votes are mixed up in the same electronic bucket. Then complex algorithms assign ‘weights’ to each candidate, and spit back out an estimated amount of votes won per candidate. These are the fractions. If a grocery store followed this model to figure out what you owe, they’d be cha ged for unfair business practices in Michigan - there would always be extra money in their till.

The media claims that apparently missing votes in the tabulation are just ‘rounding errors’. Dominion software manuals teach state employees how to set low rounding settings. In fractional voting, although rounding to .000 looks impressive, for every million voters in a statewide race rounding will lose or hide 1,000 votes. At only two decimal places, 10,000 votes vanish. The only useful purpose of low precision with millions of ballots is to conceal disenfranchisement by calling it ‘rounding errors’.

Rounding errors cannot occur in an honest two bucket system. Even monkeys can count pebbles. Every American instinctively knows this complex algorithm driven system is wrong.

The safest way to steal fractional votes is to use counties that are already heavily going for the outsider. The best time to steal is during a large release of ballots. This means that the opponent will still win the county, and the win will discourage any auditing of the ballots within the county. But the important fractionally stolen votes are effectively moved to where they are needed to flip the race to the establishment preference.

Defenders of Dominion and the other election software companies have already begun claiming there was no fraud because Trump won many of the Dominion counties. That is a misdirection. Much of the theft happened within these precincts. Fractional voting made sure the theft that was built into the software stayed hidden.

Dominion’s system was first used to help Hugo Chavez steal his referendum in 2004. The vote counting software IP comes from Smartmatic. The HuffPost has pointed out that “the IP for the vast-majority/near entirety of Sequoia’s voting systems was actually secretly owned by the Hugo Chavez-tied, Venezuelan-based firm”. Today Dominion is Sequoia is Smartmatic IP under the hood. HuffPost again: “Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez is still tied to a huge percentage of U.S. Elections, as now overseen by a Canadian firm.” And the CCP are also involved through some ownership in Smartmatic.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 44

Scytl is the data security center for Dominion, where vote tabulation occurs, overseas in China, Serbia, Germany, and Spain. Everylegalvote.com has the Scytl GitHub showing election database schematics. The design diagram explains the flow of the votes, including a procedure for ‘decorating the vote, which means to smooth the final percentages to make them look more normal to the naked eye

These facts all indicate the opportunity for vote stealing. But the media is shouting for evidence and proof. In the Philadelphia dataset fractions actually move between precincts. The fraction logic set a specific number ofvotes that Trump was allowed to get, out of a total number of votes. Dominion then set a minimum on Biden. The remainder of votes were then split to the third party candidate, or also went to Biden. The Libertarian did not get 3% of actual cast votes.

On the day of November 4, looking at the precinct level tabulations, there were about 90,000 entries made that day to the database by the precinct machines. For literally half of the tallies, Trump receives between zero and ten percent of the votes assigned by the software. This makes no sense, even in a heavily Democrat city like Philly. Trump’s voters were robbed.

Fractional fraud is found in the precinct entries. On November 4, four precincts (06-13, 50-18, 51-26, 59-23) report a vote fraction of exactly 1/48, meaning Trump received just 1 vote for every 48 votes posted. Then the fraction is moved by the software to two new precincts, 17-16 and 28-16 within about five minutes duringwhat appears to be a scheduled ‘update’ that occurred across all precincts. Moving the fractions around like this makes it very hard to track, notice, and identify the vote switching and rounding errors. But it does not happen by accident. These precise ratios cannot all happen in a random count.

Computers prefer to use prime numbers when calculating fractions. Many of the vote switching ratios in the Philadelphia data are prime number based. One fraction 4/65 (which is the prime number 13 multiplied by 5) is unusual to find in a truly random count. Philadelphia precinct 20-06 originally reports vote totals splitby this fraction at 07:08:18 on November 4. Then between 09:06:53 and 09:39:44 the fraction is moved from precinct 20-06 to four new ones: 36-08, 40-42, 43-09, and 61-11. This means that each of these new precincts got an adjustment to match the same fraction in their published ballot counts.

If you swipe pebbles from a Grecian urn, it is easily found out. If you shrink the value of a Michigann Republican’s vote so that his vote is only 4/65 of his Democrat neighbor’s vote, he cannot discover this. His vote was still ‘counted’ by the state and shows up in the tally. But it is only worth 4/65 of his neighbor. This is a violation of the sacred right to an equal vote, equal value in the count.

There can only be one conclusion from these proofs and evidences. From the beginning, the intent of electronic voting was to change an ancient honest system of two buckets into an inherently dishonest single bucket of slop. Considering the poisoned well that Smartmatic originated from in Venezuela, this is not a major leap. But until now the focus in the press and social media has been on individual instances or evidences of fraud. Americans reject the fundamental dishonesty and unfairness in the one bucket system.

How do we fix this since almost every state used these designed-to-fraud systems? One way would be for the Michigan legislature to call an emergency session, use their police powers to impound every voting machine, thumb drive, hard drive, official phone and anything else used in the election, and work withfraud investigators to discover what happened with every vote during the tabulation. Discover how the vote count was stopped, in coordination with the other swing states, right at the point where Trump was leading.

ENCLOSURE 7

Plain language description of Dominion Election Fraud: “Not Rounding Errors”

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 45

Who took the phone calls? Who made the directive state-wide to stop counting? Was Dr. Eric Coomer, the Dominion VP for Security and patent holder of their ballot security technology, directing things behind the scenes? These questions must be answered as well as the forensic investigation of the machines.

In addition, require every precinct and county to submit all audit trails, documents, total blank ballot counts and number of ballots used. Finally, process the cast ballots in every county in Michigan while going by hand to filter out the other kinds of fraud (fake ballots, invalid signatures, dead voters). Sort the ballots into twostacks, one for Biden and one for Trump. Count the pieces of paper using a basic paper counter, such as the Bantam-INT that can count up to 2,000 pages per minute. The vote counting machines must not be used for this process – they CANNOT be trusted to count fairly.

These steps will remove all fraud possibilities and solidify all true citizens behind the real winner of the 2020 election, whether it was Biden or Trump. Americans always accept a win gained fair and square.

Further Reading:

http://blogs.getty.edu/iris/voting-with-the-ancient-greeks/

https://phys.org/news/2011-03-monkeys-basic-skills-thought.html

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/exclusive-on-heels-of-die_b_620084

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg&feature=emb_logo

https://gnews.org/580072/

https://gnews.org/577635/

ENCLOSURE 7

Plain language description of Dominion Election Fraud: “Not Rounding Errors”

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 46

Election FraudVideo Alleged to Show Ga. Ballots Counted After Poll Watchers Were Ousted https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/georgia-poll-watchers-jacki-pick/2020/12/03/id/999979/

Key Battleground States Show Massive Election Fraud, Voting Irregularities Totally Erase Biden’s Lead https://www.oann.com/key-battleground-states-show-massive-election-fraud-voting-irregularities-total-ly-erase-bidens-lead/

Timing of Large Georgia Ballot Dump for Biden Appears to Coincide with Timing of Mother-Daughter Duo’s Election Fraud Scam https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/timing-large-georgia-ballot-dump-biden-appears-coincide-tim-ing-mother-daughter-duos-election-fraud-scam/

President Trump’s Legal Team Presents Evidence Of Voter Fraud In Ga., Gov. Brian Kemp Calls For Signa-ture Audit https://www.oann.com/president-trumps-legal-team-presents-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-ga-gov-brian-kemp-calls-for-signature-audit/

USPS Whistleblower in Michigan Claims Higher-Ups Were Engaging in Voter Fraud https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/11/04/usps-whistleblower-in-michigan-claims-higher-ups-were-engaging-in-voter-fraud-n2579501

Why Did Six Battleground States with Democrat Governors (Except One) ALL Pause Counting on Election Night? And How Was This Coordinated? https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/six-battleground-states-democrat-governors-pause-count-ing-election-night-coordinated/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

Election Fraud Witnesses Provide Testimony In Mich. https://www.oann.com/election-fraud-witnesses-provide-testimony-in-mich/

Trump Attorney: Evidence of ‘Real Voter Fraud’ in Nevada https://www.newsmax.com/politics/jesse-binnall-voter-fraud-nevada-ballots/2020/12/02/id/999656/

Evidence Of Voting Fraud Continues To Grow https://www.oann.com/evidence-of-voting-fraud-continues-to-grows/

Supreme Court Pushes Up Deadline in Pennsylvania Mail-In Ballot Dispute https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/1000280/16

Philly GOP Claims Voter Fraud At Poll Sites Across City https://dailycaller.com/2016/11/08/philadelphia-gop-dems-banning-republican-poll-watchers-from-poll-sites-across-city/

Whistleblowers Testify To Fraud In Battleground States https://www.oann.com/whistleblowers-testify-to-fraud-in-battleground-states/

Trump Campaign Continues To Fight As More Evidence Of Voter Fraud Emerges https://www.oann.com/trump-campaign-continues-to-fight-as-more-evidence-of-vote -fraud-emerges/

Wisconsin Lawmakers Seeking to Figure Out Whether Nov. 3 Election Was Fair and Accurate Epoch Times.com Wisconsin Lawmakers Seeking to Figure Out Whether Nov. 3 Election Was Fair and Accu-rate

Vote Irregularities in Pennsylvania and Georgia: Data Expert The Epoch Times.com Vote Irregularities in Pennsylvania and Georgia: Data Expert

ENCLOSURE 8Open-Source Intel: Sample collection of articles on crime, fraud,

and foreign influence

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 47

Michigan GOP Poll Challenger: ‘They Didn’t Disqualify a Single Ballot’ The Epoch Times.com: Michigan GOP Poll Challenger: ‘They Didn’t Disqualify a Single Ballot’

Witnesses Testify at Michigan House Hearing The Epoch Times.com Witnesses Testify at Michigan House Hearing

Facts Matter (Dec. 2): 280,000 Ballots Go Missing in PA The Epoch Times.com Facts Matter (Dec. 2): 280,000 Ballots Go Missing in Pennsylvania (theepochtimes.com)

Witness on Verge of Tears Testifying About Intimidation, Harassment at Detroit Vote Processing Center https://www.theepochtimes.com/witness-on-verge-of-tears-testifying-about-intimidation-harassment-at-de-troit-vote-processing-centre_3603243.html

Infographic: What Happened in Atlanta on Election Night https://www.theepochtimes.com/what-happened-in-atlanta-on-election-night-2_3607130.html

Coffee County Letter Says It Couldn’t Certify Georgia Recount Over ‘Inability’ to Duplicate Results https://www.theepochtimes.com/letter-from-georgias-coffee-county-says-it-cant-certify-statewide-re-count_3611367.html

Voting Machine USB Drives Had Totals Altered Overnight, Witness in Nevada Election Contest Alleges https://www.theepochtimes.com/voting-machine-usb-drives-had-totals-altered-overnight-witness-in-nevada-election-contest-alleges_3604396.html

3 Percent of Nevada Mail Ballots in Question After Survey Finds Defrauded Voters https://www.theepochtimes.com/3-percent-of-nevada-mail-ballots-in-question-after-survey-finds-defraudedvoters_3602843.html

Data Scientist: ‘Weird’ Spike in Incomplete Nevada Voter Registrations, Use of ‘Casinos’ as Home Addresses https://www.theepochtimes.com/data-scientist-weird-spike-in-incomplete-nevada-voter-registrations-some-us-ing-casinos-as-home-address_3595924.html

Arizona GOP Says Ballots Were ‘Altered and Removed’ from Trump’s Total https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-gop-says-ballots-were-altered-and-removed-from-trumps-to-tal_3603162.html

Election Supervisor Demonstrates Vote Changing on Dominion Software https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-supervisor-demonstrates-vote-changing-on-dominion-soft-ware_3614714.html

Criminal ActivityUSPS Whistleblower in Michigan Claims Higher-Ups Were Engaging in Voter Fraud https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/11/04/usps-whistleblower-in-michigan-claims-higher-ups-were-engaging-in-voter-fraud-n2579501

USPS Whistleblower Jesse Morgan Says He Was Interrogated https://theepochtimes.com/usps-whistleblower-jesse...

MI Atty General Intimidates Witness of Fraud Training Given to Poll Workers https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-exclusive-michigan-ag-dana-nessel-sends-cease-desist-or-der-journalist-demanding-erase-detroitleaks-video-showing-voter-fraud-training-face-criminal-prosecution/

ENCLOSURE 8Open-Source Intel: Sample collection of articles on crime, fraud,

and foreign influence

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 48

ENCLOSURE 8Open-Source Intel: Sample collection of articles on crime, fraud,

and foreign influence

As Many as 6,000 Illegal Votes Identified in Nevada – Thousands of People Referred to DOJ For Potential Criminal Violation of Election Laws https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/many-6000-illegal-votes-identified-nevada-thousands-people-r -ferred-doj-potential-criminal-violation-election-laws/

INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN FREEMAN ON EVERYLEGALVOTE.COM AND MASSIVE BIDEN ONLY VOTES American Family Radio - Interview with Kevin Freeman on Everylegalvote.com and Massive Biden Only Votes (afr.net)

One person’s vote equal to half a vote and another person’s vote is equal to two votes! Economic War Room: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFKigfQ-jv0#_blank

Col. John Mills former Cyber Security Expert for Pentagon confirms upcoming G race will be stolen if no urgent changes Real America’s Voice: Securing America: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtr0Hhz2wvI#_blank Liquid Lunch on Every Legal Vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPTD64bzs34#_blank

Secure Freedom Radio Frank Gaffney interviews Kevin Freeman on Every Legal Vote https://www.centerfor-securitypolicy.org/2020/11/24/diana-west-the-future-of-american-democracy/#_blank

Kevin Freeman, Every Legal Vote – Identifying Election Fraud and Calling it Out America Can We Talk with Debbie Georgatos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSom2SP8FBQ#_blank

Keet Lewis with EveryLegalVote.com on Lou Dobbs https://libertycgc.com/keet-lewis-with-everylegalvote-com-on-lou-dobbs/#_blank

Never, never, never Surrender! - National Pulse Raheem Kassam interview with Kevin Freeman from Every Legal Vote Real America’s Voice: National Pulse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBRNDWcuw9g#_blank

Steve Scalise, John Eastman, Kevin Freeman, Scott Rasmussen Washington Watch: https://www.tonyperkins.com/get.cfm?i=LR20K09#_blank

NTD Business Full Broadcast on Every Legal Vote NTD TV Epoch Times https://www.ntd.com/ntd-business-full-broadcast-nov-13_527707.html#_blank

Raheem Kassam talks about everylegalvote.com https://americasvoice.news/video/lkCzLr981u0HBMs/#_blank

Texas AG Hopes Supreme Court Will Take Up Election Case, Hear Arguments https://www.theepochtimes.com/texas-ag-hopes-supreme-court-will-take-up-election-case-and-hear-argu-ments_3611060.html

Wisconsin USPS Subcontractor Alleges Backdating of Tens of Thousands of Mail-In Ballots https://www.theepochtimes.com/wisconsin-usps-subcontractor-alleges-backdating-of-tens-of-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots_3601580.html

Michigan GOP: Secretary of State Trying to Delete Election Data Amid Audit Calls https://www.theepochtimes.com/michigan-gop-secretary-of-state-trying-to-delete-election-data-amid-audit-calls_3605155.html

Every Allegation in Trump Georgia Election Contest Supported by Testimony: Attorney https://www.theepochtimes.com/every-allegation-in-trump-georgia-election-contest-supported-by-testimo-ny-attorney_3610757.html

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 49

Witnesses at Michigan Hearing Testify on GOP Worker Harassment https://www.theepochtimes.com/witnesses-at-michigan-hearing-testify-on-gop-worker-harassment_3601730.html

Foreign Influence & InterferenceFrom August, 2020 – FOX News

China’s anti-Trump election meddling raises new alarm

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/china-election-interference-threat

Intelligence officials say they are increasingly concerned about interference in the U.S. election by China,adding to existing concerns about meddling by Russia that have been around since 2016

Georgia, Mired in Election Disputes, Fosters Cozy Ties with China The Epoch Times: Georgia, Mired in Election Disputes, Fosters Cozy Ties With China

Lawsuit Claiming Iranian, Chinese Operatives Potentially Targeted Dominion Voting Systems https://www.oann.com/sidney-powell-files-lawsuit-claiming-iranian-chinese-operatives-potentially-ta get-ed-dominion-voting-systems/

Sidney Powell to Newsmax TV: Dominion Designed to ‘Rig Elections’ https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/sidney-powell-dominion-voting-systems/2020/11/17/id/997526/

Sidney Powell: Backdoor Access From Foreign Countries Into 2020 Election Machines https://populist.press/sidney-powell-backdoor-access-from-foreign-countries-into-2020-election-machines/

Voter Rights Group Notifies DOJ of Pakistani Link With Nevada Election Email System EpochTimes.com: Voter Rights Group Notifies DOJ of Pakistani Link With Nevada Election Email System

ENCLOSURE 8Open-Source Intel: Sample collection of articles on crime, fraud,

and foreign influence

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 50

In this transcript of the now-infamous speech by the Chinese Communist Party’s political operative Di Dongsheng, who highlighted on November 28 the fact that China helped Biden’s son build his global companies. Dongsheng, associate dean, School of International Relations at Renmin University of China on Nov 28, 2020 in Shanghai was featured on the television program “The Answers.” The topic for a panel discussion was “Will China’s Opening Up in the Financial Sector Attract Wall Street Wolves?”

TRANSLARTED TRANSCRIPT BELOW

“Trump waged a trade war with us. Why couldn’t we handle him? Why is it that between 1992 and 2016 we always resolved issues with US? Did you guys know? All the crisis, the Yinhe incident, bombing of the embassy or the mid-air collision, everything was taken care of swiftly, in no more than two months.

Why? Now, I’m going to drop a bomb - because we had people up there [laughter] inside America’s core circle of power, we had our old friends. Due to time constraint, I won’t expand on that, but let me very quickly tell you a short story. Director General Zhang Zhixiang spoke well with some amazing stories. So here is my story. Well,… it was… because we are on live streaming, millions of people are watching, I have to be careful how many details I go into, I can’t turn them in. (a literal and more direct translation: I can’t sell out these people )[laughter]

Let me just put it this way: It was in 2015, before the second last visit to the U.S. by Secretary General Xi [Jinping[. As we all know, everybody in the system must warm things up for his visit. The way one organization in the Party did the warm-up was to boost some publicity, i.e. to promote Xi’s new book Xi Jinping: The Governance of China. We will launch its first English edition in U.S. by having a pressconference before his arrival, to build him some momentum. Who will do this job? Just like today, they said, “Hey, Di Dongsheng, you are very good at fooling the foreigners” because they had seen how I conned them, which they thought was very effective. So, I would be the host and part of the panel. It was just like what we are doing today, I being the host and a speaker. The senior officials picked the venue and told us to go toPolitics and Prose Bookstore at 3:30 pm next Thursday. It’s on Connecticut Ave, in Washington DC, 2650 Connecticut Ave, I think. We’d launch the new book there. So we went there to make the booking. Things are run very differently in China and in U.S. It was very difficult to book the place with such a short notice.The owner said arrogantly “Sorry, can’t do it.” So I asked him, “Which author booked the place for that timeframe?” What did I mean by asking him that? Well, there is nothing U.S. dollars can’t buy. If one bundle of cash couldn’t, I’d l throw in another. [laughter]. That’s how I work. [laughter and applause].

Still, the owner said arrogantly “Sorry but I won’t tell you which author booked the place for that timeframe. We have our principles.” He was very arrogant, very pretentious. Later I learned that this fella was a Democrat. Although a Democrat, he used to be a journalist in Asia. So he had some opinions on our Party, which is why he deliberately refused to play along. I thought it was over. We have to find another venue ortime. So we reported this problem to the senior leaders. and let them solve the problem. I was just helping out anyway. However, on Thursday morning, one of the deputy directors of that [Party] department who was the keynote speaker of that day called me by phone and told me that everything would go as planned, in the exact venue at the exact time. I went there right after lunch to find the senior leader had already got therebefore I did.

ENCLOSURE 9 Foreign Influence Example - Transcript of Remarks by Di Dongsheng of China

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 51

And the reason why we could go as planned was because a hero had helped us out. He introduced me to an old lady with a big nose, obviously a Jew simply by that look. She gave me a business card and told me her name. She said “nice to meet you” although in Mandarin with a very authentic Beijing accent. I was shocked. “You speak better Mandarin than me. I’ll never lose my provincial Jiangsu accent. But you are spot on.” She was quite content with my compliments. “I not only speak Mandarin, but also have Chinese citizenship.” As you all know, you guys can’t have foreign citizenship. There is no dual citizenship in China. But it’s very unlikely for old ladies like her to give up US & Israel citizenships for Chinese citizenship. Don’t you think?

I suddenly realized she is one of the Chinese people’s old friends. What she said next impressed me even more. “I have not only Chinese citizenship, but also Beijing hukou [official household registration]. I havea courtyard house in a prime location, in the Eastern District along the Chang-An Avenue [near Tiananmen Square]. Drop by for tea when you are back in Beijing. Any problem in here during your stay in the U.S. just let me know.” Which basically means “I’ve got you covered.”

Then I saw the arrogant shop owner was with an annoyed face, directing the staff to arrange tables and chairs, reluctantly following someone’s order. I asked her how she managed to force him to comply. We tried everything with him. He’s too arrogant. The old lady cunningly grinned, “I reasoned with him.” Do you know where that phrase came from? It’s a famous line from the mafia movie the Godfathe , in which they cut the horse head off and stick it in someone’s bed. Of course she is not mafia. So, who is she? Why had she been living in China for 30 years? And why such an authentic Beijing accent? Remember the big Wall Street institution I mentioned earlier? The top Wall Street financial institution. Well, she’s the president of its Asian operations. I can’t say more without making political trouble. if you do. [laughter and applause]

OK. In plain and simple language, during the last three to four decades, we used the core circle inside America’s real power. As I said the Wall Street had a very profound influence over America’s domestic and foreign affairs since the 1970s. We used to heavily rely on them. Problem is the role of Wall Street has been declining since 2008. But most importantly, after 2016 the Wall Street couldn’t control Trump, because, awkwardly, there was a soft breach of contract between them, which made them hostile to each other. . I won’t go into details because we might run out of time. During the U.S.-China trade war, they tried to help. My friends in U.S. told me that they tried to help, but they couldn’t.

Now with Biden winning the election, the traditional elites, political elites, the establishment, they have a very close

relationship with the Wall Street. You all heard that Trump said Biden’s son has securities companies all over the world.

But who helped Biden’s son build his global companies? You understand?--There are indeed buy-and-sell transactions involved in here [audience applause].

So I think at this particular time [after Biden won the election], it is of strategic and tactical value for us to show goodwill [to Biden]--of course, this is just from my limited perspective as a political economist.

ENCLOSURE 9 Foreign Influence Example - Transcript of Remarks by Di Dongsheng of China

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 52

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

George Soros’s role in Election Influenc

To be investigated: evidence suggests that George Soros has a long history of funding projects to undermine voter integrity in the U.S. and around the world, thus elevating his “open society” policies and candidates. Millions of dollars in grants can be found in Open Society Foundation IRS 990s and internal OSF memos made public and still on Scribd.com (OSF is Soros.org).

Millions of Americans wonder, why is one man, with his family and global network, allowed so much influence and harm to America, and to other nations? Is the Soros network above the law and thus not investigated for breaking laws, perhaps including interstate commerce to incite riots such as his funding of non-profits like Alliance for Justice (AfJ) related to Antifa, RICO laws, Patriot Act laws, untruthful media and “fact-checkers,” foreign election collusion and more? Why is the Soros network allowed to continue its harm to people and U.S. Constitutional law? Where are the leaders in our government who will stand up for truth and justice -- for America?

Our team can assist with further research, if requested. Below, please find a short list of Soros influencprojects to begin a proper investigation –

1) Soros’s ties to voting technology including Smartmatic & Dominion

2) Soros’s Open Society Foundation (OSF) decades of projects to reduce voter integrity

3) Soros’s Opposition to Republican U.S. Presidents

4) Soros’s funding of corrupt Secretaries of State, District Attorneys, Governors, members of Congress and other government officials

5) Soros’s influence in elections around the world, see OSF documents on Scribd etc

6) Soros’s ties to “Color Revolutions” against political opponents, around the world.

7) Soros’s financial support of elections, policies and candidates advancing crime and criminalityby weakening laws, police and U.S. national security; support of the “rights” of terrorists, propaganda and the “sex work” industry in America and globally.

1) Soros ties to technology, including Smartmatic & Dominion and Social Media:

A. Smartmatic/Dominion -

George Soros’s longtime relationship with British “Lord,” Mark Malloch Brown, former Chairman of Smartmatic with ties to Dominion Voting Systems, while on the global board of Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF) and a leader of OSF’s International Crisis Group (ICG) that targets ‘open society’ political opponents (who are pro-sovereignty) around the world. This month, George and Alex Soros named Mark Malloch Brown the incoming President of Open Society Foundations (OSF). Quite a job for someone closely aligned with election theft concerns.

National Pulse wrote that Dominion & Smartmatic are not distinct and “fierce competitors” but have a non-compete agreementindicating previous connectivity. Some of this strategy is media and perception social manipulation. The question is, to what extent is it voting manipulation.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 53

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

B. Dominion & Smartmatic associations - (screenshot below)

See an interactive chart of Dominion/Soros connections here:

https://graphcommons.com/graphs/d208e5f8-aa2a-429b-b576-63e676d9f3e3?sel=1bb0fe52-9274-468b-9734-7908d6ff1f6e&auto=true

C. Dominion’s Toronto office shared a floor wit Tides Foundation, a Soros and Open Society Foundation funding pass-through. Dominion quickly move in 2020, (as they also quickly moved after the 2020 election, in Denver.) A story here: https://www.rebelnews.com/dominion_voting_shares_office_withfar_left_george_soros_linked_group

And: https://nationalfile.com/dominion-voting-systems-shares-flo -space-with-soros-group-partnered-with-soros-friend/

Previous warning from Democrats re: Dominion Voting Systems:

https://247sports.com/college/ole-miss/board/103602/Contents/-sorosobama-and-dominion-voting-systems-154816942/

On Tides Foundation including various Soros connections. https://www.influencewatch.o g/non-profittides-foundation/

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 54

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

D. Dominion’s connections to VP Biden, Pres. Obama, AG Holder and Serbia:

https://nationalfile.com/whistleblowers-biden-implicated-in-dominion-voting-scam-connected-to-serbia

““The Machines are made by Flex in China for the most part and the programming is done in Serbia and Canada and the International Corporation is Barbados.”

E. Smartmatic executives faced criminal indictment in the Philipines.

F. 2015 video of Mark Malloch Brown, OSF board member and Smartmatic Chairman: Part of Smartmatic ‘technology is licensed From Dominion’:

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/soros-linked-smartmatic-chair-on-dominion/?fbclid=IwAR0_gN-CzhylnJtgND4gTViGtbsH3vClVSylyuqCHNVwIcbbzW9MyQgkDFQ

Link: https://manilastandard.net/mobile/article/238782

Check: Dominion contracted w Smartmatic for the 2010 Philippine election. Smartmatic also means Mark Malloch-Brown, UK. Malloch-Brown vice chair of Open Society, Soros Fund Management, Global Board member of Open Society.

Check: Dominion use of Smartmatic IP in their systems through Sequoia software that they basically white-labeled? Smartmatic never gave up the IP control. And the IP was sold or used as collateral in a transaction with Chinese interests in what 2018 or 2019.

G. Facebook:

https://capitalresearch.org/article/soros-and-clinton-want-facebook-to-censor-conservatives/

Investigative questions include but are not limited to:

a. What person(s) owns Dominion Voting Systems, past and present? Often the answer is “Staple Street Capital” but is this a shell, protecting whom? Was it sold to a China-related bank/entity?

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 55

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Is there a Soros’s connection to Dominion?

Begin with The Carlyle Group, Staple Street Capital, Smartmatic and Mark Malloch Brown, William Kennard, John Poulos, Seqoia, ES&S and more.

What of John Poulos, CEO of Dominion. See his (and team’s) patents and authorizations from Colorado and other Secretaries of State for election management and oversight.

Various Poulos, Hoover, Ikonomakis, Obradovic patents at Justia.com

Eric Coomer, Dominion VP and Chief Strategy & Security Director, was a participant

in Antifa who showed hatred for President Trump. OAN reports, Eric Coomer traveled to all battleground states in 2019 and 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=746HTjhFifA

What is Coomer’s influence in our voting process

b. Soros connections to Smartmatic including Mark Malloch Brown, Peter Neffinger etc

These questions will beget more questions to be answered.

2) Soros OSF’s decades of projects to reduce voter integrity

Samples of projects include:

a. Violating rights of citizens by weakening voter ID laws.b. Attempts to lower the age of voting.c. Ballot projects funded by OSF; ballots to match machines in various statesd. Attempts to force open borders, caravans and give ID to non-citizens for illegal voting.e. Attempts to give prisoners and felons rights to vote.f. More.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 56

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Sample: a chart of OSF’s internal 2013 Public Sphere Goals including media, governance, deflectivelyaccusing the Right of “money in politics,” and Voting & Courts.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 57

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Sample grant: OSF funds the Brennan Center for “better ballot design regulations and templates for each brand and model of voting machines used in the state ...” Note: what began with 5 states mentioned in 2009, has likely expanded to most or all states. (This is before George Soros put $18 Billion more into OSF, in 2018).

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 58

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

3) Soros’s Public Opposition to Republican U.S. Presidents

A. His 2003 attempt to remove President George W. Bush: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/11/11/soross-deep-pockets-vs-bush/c7c8f9a0-d902-4298-ac8e-9132ad499238/?fbclid=IwAR0uTML0i9p9jMcu3YKdrZedg-9YAvT17RGY2AKHM2lUBBSo8FqB8tWTHH8

Washington Post – Soros’s Deep Pockets vs. Bush

By Laura Blumenfeld, November 11, 2003

“George Soros, one of the world’s richest men, has given away nearly $5 billion to promote democracy in the former Soviet bloc, Africa and Asia. Now he has a new project: defeating President Bush.”It is the central focus of my life,” Soros said, his blue eyes settled on an unseen target. The 2004 presidential race, he said in an interview, is “a matter of life and death.”

Soros, who has financed e forts to promote open societies in more than 50 countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monda , he and a partner committed up to $5 million to MoveOn.org, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush.

Overnight, Soros, 74, has become the major financial player of the left. He has elicited cries of foulplay from the right. And with a tight nod, he pledged: ‘If necessary, I would give more money.’ ‘America, under Bush, is a danger to the world,’ Soros said. Then he smiled: ‘And I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is.’”

B. President Donald J. Trump, “A danger” and “temporary phenomenon”

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/01/27/soros_trump_will_disappear_in_2020_or_ever_sooner.html?spot_im_comment_id=sp_v0xu5oCZ_700520580_c_KW21yL&spot_im_highlight_immediate=true&utm_source=SpotIM&utm_medium=Share&utm_content=sp_v0xu5oCZ_700520580_c_KW21yL

And: https://www.georgesoros.com/2018/01/25/remarks-delivered-at-the-world-economic-forum/

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 59

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/370757-soros-calls-for-stricter-regulations-on-facebook-google

4) Soros funding of corrupt Secretaries of State, District Attorneys, Governors, members of Congress, Supreme Court and other elected officials.

Sample of election fraud in Philadelphia: early voting was exploited by numerous individuals to vote multiple times, on multiple days, and cast multiple ballots each visit. I also have the name of the election official who was informed butallowed it to continue, and all of this took place under the watch of a DA Larry Krasner who can be tied to George Soros.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/10/29/meet-larry-krasner-the-rogue-prosecutor-wreaking-havoc-in-philadelphia/

Soros ties to Debate Commission member

https://thenewamerican.com/debate-commission-member-has-ties-to-soros-backed-transition-integrity-project/

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 60

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Soros-funded State Attorneys, District Attorneys, Sheriff(s) included for inquiry -

Link: https://blogg.com/2020/08/31/list-of-soros-backed-district-attorneys/

https://capitalresearch.org/article/soros-aims-to-transform-the-justice-system-by-funding-da-races/

DAs backed by Soros, other liberal activists join fray in clash with police https://www.foxnews.com/politics/da-soros-justice

The U.S. Supreme Court, political, cultural and judicial activism –

https://capitalresearch.org/article/faithful-americas-faithless-attacks-on-amy-coney-barrett-courtesy-of-george-soros/

Overall Leftist influence includes;

https://capitalresearch.org/article/george-soros-a-lifetime-fortune-spent-on-liberal-influence

and

https://capitalresearch.org/article/mapping-the-open-society-network-on-soross-90th-birthday/

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 61

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

5) Influence of elections around the world.

Below, see a sample (one of many) of an OSF spreadsheet of elections by nation, dates, who and what they are funding with dollar amounts.

A. Europe and Eurasian elections

Sample from OSF’s internal “elections shared framework … may 31 unit strategies” document (one of hundreds of such documents on OSF election work)

B. Israel: While claiming to be a victim of anti-Semitism, Mr. Soros funds anti-Semitic organizations, and opposition to PM Netanyahu and Israel itself.

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 62

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

Link: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/netanyahu-blames-soros-for-israel-anti-deportation-campaign-540640

Link: https://observer.com/2016/08/not-shocking-george-soros-funds-progressive-war-on-israel/

6) Soros’s ties to “Color Revolutions” around the world.

Includes: https://www.theepochtimes.com/former-special-forces-office -warns-of-color-revolution-tactics-used-against-trump_3612952.html

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 63

ENCLOSURE 10Non-State Actor Influence Example - Open Society Foundation (Geo ge Soros)

7) Soros’s financial support of crime and criminality by weakening laws, police and of U.S. national security; support of the “rights” of terrorists; support of the “sex work” industry in America and around the world.

A. Soros opposed President Bush declaring war on terror in response to the deadliest terrorist attack in history when 2,977 people died on 9/11/2001.

B. Efforts to close Guantanamo Bay and weaken penalties and consequences for violent terrorism, funded by Open Society Foundations (OSF)

C. Weakening the rights of police to stop crime, funded by Open Society Foundations (OSF)

D. National security reform projects funded by Open Society Foundations (OSF)

E. Mass migration projects, law and media, and rights of migrants over the rights of citizens, throughout Europe and America funded by Open Society Foundations (OSF)

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 64

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 65

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 66

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 67

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 68

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 69

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 70

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 71

ENCLOSURE 11 E.O. on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign

Interference in a US Election, September 12, 2018

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 72

ENCLOSURE 12Joint Statement of ODNI, DOJ, FBI and DHS: Combating Foreign

Influence in U.S. Elections, October 19, 201

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 73

ENCLOSURE 12Joint Statement of ODNI, DOJ, FBI and DHS: Combating Foreign

Influence in U.S. Elections, October 19, 201

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 74

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 75

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 76

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 77

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 78

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 79

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 80

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 81

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 82

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 83

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 84

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 85

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 86

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 87

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 88

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 89

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 90

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 91

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 92

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 93

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 94

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 95

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 96

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2

EveryLegalVote.com - A Citizens Coalition page 97

ENCLOSURE 13Antrim Michigan Forensics Report REVISED PRELIMINARY SUMMARY, v2