Graphs Chn

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

1/20

Table 12. Health Agencies Where Immunization was administered

Health Agencies Frequency Percentage

Barangay Health Center 37 90.24%

Private Clinic 1 2.44%

Hospital 3 7.32%

Total 41 100%

90.24%

2.44%7.32%

Figure 12. Health Agencies Where

Immunization was Administered

Barangay Health Center

Private Clinic

Hospital

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

2/20

Table 13. Nutritional Status

Status Frequency Percentage

Safe (normal) 72 75.79%

INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal) 17 17.89%

DANGER (Above normal and Very BelowNormal)

6 6.32%

Total 95 100%

75.79%

17.89%

6.32%

Figure 13. Nutritional Status

SAFE (normal)

INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal)

Danger (Above normal and Very

Below Normal)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

3/20

Table 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age 0-2 Year Old

Milk Frequency Percentage

Breast Milk 8 19.51%

Commercial Milk 2 4.88%

Mixed Feeding 31 75.61%

Total 41 100%

75.61%

19.51%

4.88%

Figure 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age

0-2 Year Old

Mixed Feeding

BreastMilk

CommercialMilk

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

4/20

Table 15. Food Given to Children aged 0-2 Years Old

Food Frequency Percentage

Rice 30 23.81%

Meat 24 19.05%

Fruits 22 17.46%

Fish 24 19.05%

Vegetables 26 20.63%

Total 126 100%

23.81%

20.63%

19.05%

19.05%

17.46%

Figure 15. Food Given to Children 0-2 Years

Old

Rice

Vegetables

Fish

Meat

Friuts

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

5/20

Table 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-6 Years Old

Food Frequency Percentage

Rice 49 19.07%

Meat 44 17.12%

Fruits 39 15.18%

Fish 44 17.12%

Vegetables 40 15.56%

Milk 41 15.95%

Total 257 100%

19.07%

17.12%

17.12%

15.95%

15.56%

15.18%

Rice

Meat

Fish

Milk

Vegetables

Fruits

0.00% 5. 00% 10.00% 15.00% 20. 00% 25.00%

Figure 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-5

Years Old

Figure 16.Food Given to

Children aged 3-5 Years Old

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

6/20

Table 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged 12-59 months

Response Frequency Percentage

Yes 56 96.55%

No 2

Total 58 100%

96.55%

3.45%

Figure 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged

12-59 months

Yes

No

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

7/20

Table 18. Type of Salt Used

Type Frequency Percentage

Ordinary Salt 24 25.81%

Iodized Salt 69 74.19

Total 93 100%

74.19%

25.81%

Figure 18. Type of Salt Used

Iodized Salt

Ordinary Salt

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

8/20

Table 19. Number of Months Pregnant

Months Frequency Percentage

1-3

4-6

7-9 1 100%

Total 1 100%

100%

Figure 19. Number of Months Pregnant

7-9 mohs Pregnant

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

9/20

Table 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups

Number of Check-ups Frequency Percentage

Once 0 0%

Twice 0 0%

Thrice 1 100%

Total 1 100%

100%

0%0%

Figure 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups

Thrice

Twice

Once

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

10/20

Table 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid Received

Tetanus Toxoid Received Frequency Percentage

1 0 0%

2 0 0%

3 0 0%

4 1 100%

None 0

Total 1 100%

100%

Figure 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid

Received

1

2

3

4

None

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

11/20

Table 22. Place of pre-natal Check-up

Places Frequency Percentage

Barangay Health Center 0 0%

Birth Attendant 0 0%

Private Hospital/Clinic 1 100%

Others (specify) 0 0%

Total 1 100%

100%

Figure 22. Place of Pre-natal Check-up

Private Hospital/Clinic

Barangay Health Center

BirthAttendant

Others (specify)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

12/20

Table 27. Status of Drinking Water


SAFE (COWD Faucet within the House,

Commercial Water)133 93.01%

INTERMEDIATE (communal faucet) 10 6.99%

DANGER (artesian well, develop spring) 0 0%

Total 143 100%

93.01%

6.99%

0%

Figure 27. Statusnof Drinking Water

SAFE (COWD Faucet within the

house, Commercial Water

INTERMIDIATE (communal

faucet)

DANGER (artesian well, develop

spring)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

13/20

Table 28. Presence of Toilet

Presence Frequency Percentage

Yes 134 93.71%

No 9

Total 143 100%

93.71%

6.29%

Figure 28. Presence of Toilet

Yes

No

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

14/20

Table 29. Types of Toilet Used

Types of Toilet Frequency Percentage

Flush 41 30.60%

Water Sealed 92 68.66%

Unsanitary pit privy 1 .74%

Total 134 100%

68.66%

30.60%

0.74%

Figure 29. Types of Toilet Used

Water Sealed

Flush

Unsanitary pit privy

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

15/20

Table 30. Status of Toilet


SAFE ( Flush, Water Sealed) 133 93.01%

DANGER (Unsanitary pit privy, No Toilet) 10 6.99%

Total 143 100%

93.01%

6.99%

Figure 30. Status of Toilet

SAFE (Flush, Water Sealed)

DANGER (Unsanitary pit

privy, No Toilet)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

16/20

Table 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal

Methods Of Garbage Disposal Frequency Percentage

Regular Garbage Collection 118 82.52%

No Methods Used 11 7.68%

Using Plastic Bags 5 3.50%

Compost pit 4 2.80%

Using Sacs 3 2.10%

Throwing Anywhere 1 .70%

Garbage Can without Cover 1 .70%

Total 143 100%

82.52%

7.68%

3.50%

2.80%

2.10%

0.70%

0.70%

Regular Garbage Collection

NoMethods Used

Using plastic Bags

Compost pit

Using Sacs

ThrowingAnywhere

Garbage Can Without Cover

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%

Figure 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal

Figure 31.Methods Used in

Garbage Disposal

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

17/20

Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal


SAFE (garbage can w/ cover, regular garbage

collection)120 83.92%

INTERMEDIATE (garbage can w/out cover,

sacks, plastic bags, compost pit)12 8.39%

DANGER (throw anywhere, no methods used 11 7.69%

TOTAL 143 100%

83.92%

8.39%

7.69%

Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal

SAFE (Garbage can w/

cover, regular garbage

collection)

INTERMEDIATE (garbage can

w/out cover, sacks, plastic

bags, compost pit)

DANGER (throw anywhere, no

mehtods used)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

18/20

Table 33. Status of Drainage Used


SAFE (closed drainage) 17 11.89%

INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage) 90 62.94%

DANGER ( No Drainage) 36 25.17%

Total 143 100%

62.94%

25.17%

11.89%

Figure 33. Status of Drainage Used

INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage)

DANGER (No Drainage)

SAFE (Closed Drainage)

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

19/20

Table 34. Status of Surroundings


INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P only, DOHherbal plants only, Incomplete MACKS-P

herbal plants

79 55.24%

DANGER (No MACKS-P and DOH HerbalPlants

64 44.26%

Total 143 100%

55.24%

44.26%

Figure 34. Status of Sorroundings

INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P

only, DOH herbal plants

only, incompleteMACKS-P and

Herbal Plants

DANGER (NoMACKS-P and DOH

herbarl plants

8/9/2019 Graphs Chn

20/20

Table 35. Status of Family Health Insurance


SAFE (Any family member having a health

insurance)103 72.03%

INTERMEDIATE ( Planning to get a health

insurance)29 20.28%

DANGER ( No plan to get health insurance) 11 7.69%

Total 143 100%

72.03%

20.28%

7.69%

Figure 35. Status of Family Health Insurance

SAFE (Any family member

having a health insurance)

INTERMEDIATE (Planning to get

a health Insurance)

DANGER (No plan to get health

insurance)

Graphs Chn

Documents