Top Banner
GMOS: FACTS AND FALLACIES Dr. Heidi Kratsch University of Nevada Cooperative Extension
57
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GMOS: FACTS AND FALLACIESDr. Heidi KratschUniversity of Nevada Cooperative Extension

Page 2: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHAT ARE GMOS ANYWAY? GMO = Genetically Modified Organism

A GMO is an organism whose genome has been altered by the techniques of genetic engineering so that its DNA contains one or more genes not normally found there.

The process is referred to as Genetic Engineering (GE).

Page 3: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GE = GM = TRANSGENIC

Page 4: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHAT IS A GENE? A short sequence of DNA that codes for a

protein Humans have 20,000 to 25,000 genes.

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/basics/chromosome

Page 5: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

ALL LIVING ORGANISMS SHARE MANY COMMON GENES

One-fourth of human genes are also found in rice.

We share 99 percent of our genome with the chimpanzee.

Humans even have the genetic information necessary to develop wings.

Source: www.geneticliteracyproject.org

Page 6: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HOW IS GE DONE? Use of viruses or

bacteria to "infect" the plant cells with the new DNA.

Coat DNA onto tiny metal pellets, and firing them into cells with a special gun.

Gene Gun

Page 7: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

FARMERS HAVE BEEN GENETICALLY MODIFYING CROPS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS!

Well…not exactlyAgricultural revolution about

12,000 years agoHumans evolved from a hunter-

gatherer lifestyle to a farming lifestyle.

Systematic “modification” of crops began in the 1940’s

Page 8: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HOW WOULD YOUR FOOD LOOK IF NOT GENETICALLY ALTERED OVER MILLENNIA?

Page 9: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies
Page 10: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

FARMERS HAVE BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY ALTERING CROPS GENETICALLY SINCE THE GREEN REVOLUTION (1940’S TO 1960’S)

Increase in agricultural production due to: Improvement in irrigation infrastructureModernization of farm managementDevelopment of synthetic fertilizersDevelopment and use of pesticidesDevelopment of high-yielding varieties of

cereal grainsDistribution of hybridized seeds

Page 11: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

CONVENTIONAL BREEDING

Page 12: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HOW DOES GE DIFFER FROM CONVENTIONAL BREEDING? Both alter genetic makeup and

properties of the product. Classical breeding operates on

traits, only indirectly selecting genes. Biotechnology targets genes,

attempting to influence traits. The potential of biotechnology is to

rapidly accelerate the rate of progress and efficiency of breeding.

Page 13: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

FLAVR SAVR TOMATO First commercially

grown genetically engineered food to be granted a license for human consumption.

Available from 1994-1997 by Calgene

Page 14: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

CAN I BUY GMO SEEDS AT MY LOCAL GARDEN CENTER?NO…!GMO seeds are purchased by

farmers from the biotech company that produced them.

The farmer must sign a use agreement that he/she will not replant the seeds and will follow EPA-mandated stewardship programs.

Page 15: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

IS THIS GMO SEED?

Page 16: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HYBRID ≠ GMO

Page 17: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GMO SEEDS ARE NOT STERILE Monsanto owns a patent on the

“Terminator” gene or terminator technology, which results in sterile seeds.

…however, Monsanto has committed to never using this technology, and

it has yet to commercialize a crop using the technology.

Page 18: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

MOST FRESH PRODUCE IS NOT GMO

Commercially available GMO food crops (U.S.): Soybean Corn Cotton Canola Sugar beet Papaya (Hawaiian) Squash (zucchini and yellow summer)

Page 19: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

FIRST GENERATION GE CROPS Crops engineered to tolerate

herbicides (mostly glyphosate). Crops engineered to produce their own

insecticide (Bt crops). These traits are incorporated into over

90 percent of the soybean, corn and cotton grown in the U.S.

Page 20: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HERBICIDE-TOLERANT CROPS HELP IMPROVE SOIL AND WATER QUALITY

Have increased adoption of no-till.

No-till systems may prevent: soil erosion compaction runoff of water,

sediments, chemicals Have the potential to

benefit soil and water quality.

Page 21: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

BUT USE OF THE GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANCE

GE TRAIT IS NOT WITHOUT ITS CHALLENGES

Page 22: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GLYPHOSATE-TOLERANT CROPSThe Good News:Glyphosate has replaced more

toxic and persistent herbicides.

The Challenge:Evolution of glyphosate-resistance

in some weed species. Herbicide resistance was happening

prior to the introduction of GE crops.

Page 23: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

RELIANCE ON ONE HERBICIDE REDUCES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HERBICIDE TOLERANCE

Glyphosate-resistance has been documented in 28 weed species worldwide (14 species in the U.S.)

Source: University of Minnesota

Page 24: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

Source: Ian Heap, International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds www.weedscience.org/graphs/soagraph.aspx (2013)

Page 25: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANCE AMONG WEED POPULATIONS IN RECENT YEARS MAY HAVE INDUCED FARMERS TO RAISE APPLICATION RATES.

Page 26: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies
Page 27: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHAT CAUSED GLYPHOSATE RESISTANCE?

Overreliance on glyphosate for weed management.

Reduction in the diversity of weed management practices adopted by crop producers.

In both GE and non-GE systems, a greater emphasis on integrated weed management is needed.

Page 28: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

PENDING INTRODUCTION OF CROPS WITH TOLERANCE TO 2,4-D AND DICAMBA

Different site of action than glyphosate.

Historically few weed-resistance issues with these chemicals.

Will need to monitor for: Increase in weed-resistance Potential for “drift” onto nontarget

plants Farmer simultaneous adoption of other

integrated weed management strategies

Page 29: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

IPM MAY HELP SUSTAIN EFFECTIVENESS OF HERBICIDE-TOLERANT CROPS

USDA NRCS supports: Diversification of weed management

strategies Crop rotation Increased intensity of tillage for weed

controlUnion of Concerned Scientists supports: Increased crop rotation and cover crops Decreased emphasis on monoculture

cropping systems

Page 30: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GE CROPS ENGINEERED TO EXPRESS THE BT TOXIN

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring soil bacterium that produces a protein toxic to certain insects.

Genes from Bt are inserted into crop plants so they make the protein.

Bt sprays are permitted in organic production; crops engineered to produce Bt toxin are not.

Page 31: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

INSECTICIDE USE DECREASED WITH ADOPTION OF BT CROPS

Page 32: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

INSECT RESISTANCE TO BT CROPS Incidence of insect resistance to Bt crops has been remarkably low but is increasing:Pink bollworm (cotton, India)Corn rootworm (corn, U.S.)

Page 33: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

Refuges delay resistance by providing susceptible insects to mate with the resistant ones from the GE crop.

www.evolution.berkeley.edu

Page 34: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

NON-TARGET EFFECTS OF BT Initial study in 1999 indicated harm. Monarch caterpillars feed exclusively on

milkweed leaves. Early concern that pollen from Bt corn could

blow onto milkweed leaves. Later extensive work showed (published in

PNAS): Current Bt corn varieties do not express large

amounts of Bt proteins in their pollen. Levels of pollen shed on milkweed leaves is

much lower than amounts shown to cause harm.

Page 35: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

EFFECTS OF GE ON CROP YIELDS Current GE crop varieties not

engineered for increased yield over conventional varieties.

Economic benefit comes from enhanced protection from yield loss due to pests.

The greatest yields are seen with crops engineered to have multiple (stacked) GE traits.

Page 36: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHO BENEFITS FROM FIRST GENERATION GE CROPS?

Mostly farmers and seed companies

Focus has been on two traits:Bt crops decrease amount of

insecticides sprayedGlyphosate-resistant crops reduce

use of the most toxic chemicals to fight weeds

Page 37: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HERBICIDE- AND PEST-TOLERANCE ARE NOT THE ONLY TRAITS THAT CAN BE GENETICALLY ENGINEERED INTO CROPS….

Page 38: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHAT CROP TRAITS WOULD BENEFIT A HOTTER, FLATTER, MORE CROWDED PLANET?

Crops engineered for increased yield and quality

Crops engineered to use nitrogen fertilizer more efficiently

Crops engineered for drought, salinity and/or heat tolerance

Page 39: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GE CROPS CAN BE NUTRITIONALLY ENHANCED

Rice is a staple in many developing countries.

Rice modified to contain beta carotene.

Can prevent or treat maternal anemia and blindness.

Golden Rice enhanced with Vitamin A

http://www.goldenrice.org/

Page 40: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GE HAWAIIAN PAPAYA: A BIOTECHNOLOGY SUCCESS STORY?

Papaya Ringspot-Virus (PRSV) threatened to decimate the industry in Hawaii.

Hawaiian papaya engineered with resistance to PRSV.

Viral genes encoding capsid proteins transferred to papaya genome.

Elicits an immune response in papaya.

PRSV-infected papaya on the left; virus-resistant papaya on the right

Page 41: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

WHY IS THE TECHNOLOGY CURRENTLY IN THE HANDS OF LARGE AGROCHEMICAL COMPANIES?

Cost of discovery, development and authorization of a new plant biotechnology trait introduced between 2008 and 2012 was $136 million. 

About 26 percent of those costs were incurred as part of the regulatory testing and registration process.

Average time from initiation of a discovery project to commercial launch is about 13 years.

Page 42: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

PUBLIC CONCERNS ABOUT GMOS Antibiotic-resistance genes Food safety – are GE foods safe to eat? Mistrust of the regulatory process “Super weeds” – gene transfer of

herbicide resistance gene to weedy relatives

Gene containment – transfer of traits and protection of conventional or organic crops

Page 43: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GMOS HAVE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT GENES IN THEM

Some scientists believe that eating GM food containing these marker genes could encourage gut bacteria to develop antibiotic resistance.

Page 44: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

HOW ARE GMOS REGULATED?

USDA APHIS• Determines

risk of transgenic crop becoming a pest

U.S. EPA• Ensures

safety of pest-resistant transgenic crops

U.S. FDA• Regulates

food and animal feed derived from transgenic crops

Page 45: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

ARE GM CROPS RIGOROUSLY TESTED?

Substantial Equivalence (U.S.) Product tested by the manufacturer for

unexpected changes in a limited set of components (toxins, nutrients or allergens that are present in the unmodified food).

If these tests show no significant difference between the modified and unmodified products, no further food safety testing is required.

Page 46: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

IS THIS RIGOROUS ENOUGH? Substantial equivalence not a strict

definition. Compositional analysis tests only a

limited number of components. Regulations focus on the product, not

the technology. If a GE food is deemed substantially

equivalent, it is exempt from further testing.

Both GE and conventional breeding can lead to unexpected results.

Page 47: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE (EU) Invoked in the event of a potential

risk – even if it cannot be fully demonstrated or quantified, or its effects determined.

Appropriate measures to anticipate and prevent harm should be taken.

It is impossible to precisely predict every possible outcome from GE technology.

Page 48: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION“Our AMA supports mandatory pre-market systematic safety assessments of bioengineered foods and encourages: (a) development and validation of additional techniques for the detection and/or assessment of unintended effects; (b) continued use of methods to detect substantive changes in nutrient or toxicant levels in bioengineered foods as part of a substantial equivalence evaluation; (c) development and use of alternative transformation technologies to avoid utilization of antibiotic resistance markers that code for clinically relevant antibiotics, where feasible; and (d) that priority should be given to basic research in food allergenicity to support the development of improved methods for identifying potential allergens. The FDA is urged to remain alert to new data on the health consequences of bioengineered foods and update its regulatory policies accordingly.”

Page 49: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

THE TECHNOLOGY IS ADVANCING… Focus on use of plant (rather than

animal or bacterial) genes that control agronomically important traits (stress resistance, improved yield)

Chloroplast engineering to reduce risk of pollen drift and toxicity to non-target species.

Remove antibiotic-resistance marker genes.

Pursue alternative technologies.

Page 50: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION Molecular breeding Precision breeding Speeds up

conventional breeding process from decades to as little as 5 years

Breeding heirloom tomatoes to be resistant to most common tomato diseases.

Page 51: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION

Page 52: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

CAN GE AND NON-GE COEXIST?

Expand research funding for public crop breeding programs, so that a broad range of non-GE as well as GE crop varieties will remain available.

Expand public research funding and incentives to further develop and adopt agroecologically based farming systems.

Take steps—such as changes in patent law—to facilitate independent scientific research on GE risks and benefits.

Take a more rigorous, independently verified approach to GE product approvals, so that products do not come to market until their risks and benefits are understood through non-biased review.

Support food labeling laws that require foods containing GE crops to be clearly identified as such, so that consumers can make informed decisions about supporting GE applications in agriculture. - Union of concerned scientists

Page 53: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

THE LAND INSTITUTE (SALINAS, KS)

Working to develop perennial crops using conventional breeding for a polycultural agricultural system

Perennials develop deeper root systems

Outcompete annual weeds for light Form complex ecosystems Prevent soil erosion Improves soil fertility Decreased use of chemical

fertilizers and pesticides Sequester carbon/reduction in

greenhouse gas emissions

Breeding program is focused on perennializing wheat, and domesticating perennial intermediate wheatgrass (which we have named Kernza™), several species of sunflower, and sorghum. http://www.landinstitute.org/our-work/solutions/

Page 54: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CROPS IN THE UNITED STATES

http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err162.aspx#.U22IXFf15I0

Page 57: GMOs: Facts and Fallacies

GROW – BUY – EAT – LOCAL