Top Banner
CIV-130 ATIORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATIORNEY (Neme, State Bar number, and ad:1re3s): FOR COURT USE ONLY Adriana E. Dominguez (265502) :-DOMINGUEZ LAW OFRCE FILED La Playa Drive South Costa Mesa, CA 92627 SUPERIOR COUI'tT OF CA"IFORNIA TELEPHONE NO.o 949-860-7152 FAX NO. COUNiY OF ORANGE - CENTER •-tL AOOREss ropliomVo adriana@ dominguezlawoffice.com DEC 02 20, ATIORNEY FOR (Namet Plaintiff, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Orange ALA\11 GARLSON. Cieri< of lhe Court STREET AOORESS: 700 Civic Center Drive West MAIUNG ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Ana, CA 92701 BRANCH NI\ME: Central Justice Center PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: an individual DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Stephane Marchand, an individual; et. aJ. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER: OR ORDER 30-2011-00451527 (Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded was exceeded $25,000) $25,000 or less) TO ALL PARTIES : 1. A judgment, decree, or order was entered in this action on (date): September 14, 2011 2. A copy of the judgment, decree, or order is attached to this notice. Date: November 28, 2011 Adriana E. Dominguez (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY c=J PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) Fo"" Approved tor Use Judicial Councll of california CIV-130 {New January 1, 20101 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER Page.1 of'2
14

Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

Oct 10, 2014

Download

Documents

An Anaheim School Guidance Counselor successfully sued Stephane Marchand for over $25,000 for fraudulent business dealings and accused him of, among other things, spending investors money on luxuries like a trip to Hawaii and a Rolex watch.

Follow the story on http://www.laderaportal.com
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • CIV-130 ATIORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATIORNEY (Neme, State Bar number, and ad:1re3s): FOR COURT USE ONLY

Adriana E. Dominguez (265502) :-DOMINGUEZ LAW OFRCE

FILED 228~ La Playa Drive South Costa Mesa, CA 92627 SUPERIOR COUI'tT OF CA"IFORNIA

TELEPHONE NO.o 949-860-7152 FAX NO. (0~49-666-6497 COUNiY OF ORANGE

- CENT~Ab J~iliiCe CENTER •-tL AOOREss ropliomVo adriana@ dominguezlawoffice.com

DEC 02 20, ATIORNEY FOR (Namet Plaintiff, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Orange

ALA\11 GARLSON. Cieri< of lhe Court STREET AOORESS: 700 Civic Center Drive West MAIUNG ADDRESS: Ill~<;~ CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Ana, CA 92701

BRANCH NI\ME: Central Justice Center

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: an individual DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Stephane Marchand, an individual; et. aJ.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:

OR ORDER 30-2011-00451527

(Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded was exceeded $25,000) $25,000 or less)

TO ALL PARTIES :

1. A judgment, decree, or order was entered in this action on (date): September 14, 2011

2. A copy of the judgment, decree, or order is attached to this notice.

Date: November 28, 2011

Adriana E. Dominguez ~~-'-.L::l~..lll.I:Jil.d~P.:~fA,L.J.L..i;t..-,J>L----(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ~ ATTORNEY c=J PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY)

Fo"" Approved tor O~onal Use Judicial Councll of california

CIV-130 {New January 1, 20101 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER

Page.1 of'2

~W~W.courtinfo.ce.gov

Page 2: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

"-:()

CIV-130 i r-Jivi~\ ASENUMBER PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: P.,\ 'b.(\ 1"\\ L ~'be\

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: S r,~. \. ?0- 2cHI -00'1515;/J:+--

PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST -CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER

(NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order if you are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service.)

1. I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took

place, and my residence or business address is (specify): ()a, €.;( La_ p (~ 2,. be. S .

Cos~M-r'>k/(A- ?d0ct.+-2. l served a copy of the Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with postage

fully prepaid and (check one):

a. 0 deposfted the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service.

b. D placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.

3. The Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order was mailed:

a. on (date): \ \j ?Dj,) 0 \\

b. from (city and state): () ( a...~ ~ 1

( ;1\

4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:

a. Name of person served: Stephana Marchand

Street address: 8730 Sunset Blvd., Suite 270

City: West Hollywood

State and zip code: CA, 90069

b. Name of person served: Stephana Marchand

Street address: 5 Lindenwood Farm

Cfty: Ladera Ranch

State and zip code: CA, 92694

c. Name of person served:

Street address:

City:

State and zip code:

d. Name of person served:

Street address:

City:

State and zip code:

D Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).)

5. Number of pages attached _0 __ .

I declare under penalty of pe~ury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date (\j30j ;7-0\l

Adriana E. Dominguez, Esq. {1YPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT)

Page2of2

CJV -130 (New January 1, 201 OJ NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER

Page 3: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • 2

Adriana E. Dominguez 1 . Attorney at Law

Dominguez Law Office FILED

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

3

4

5

6

7

~8 @bg © 10

r? ~ 11

~ 12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

2282 La Playa Drive South Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Phone (949) 860-7152 Fax (949) 666-6497 E-mail: [email protected]

Attorney for Plaintiff

SEP 14 2011

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY

UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

an individual;

Plaintiff,

vs.

STEPHANE MARCHAND, an individual; and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

Defendants.

Case No.: 30-2011-00451527

[W«JfvS!&] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT

No Hearing Set Judge: Robert J. Moss Department: C2 3 Date Action Filed: 2/18/2011 No Trial Date Set

22 The Court, pursuant to California Rules of Court Sectio

23 3.110 (g) and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 585 (d),

24

25

26

27

28

having read the papers submitted and considered the arguments i

support of the Order on Plaintiff's Application for Entry o

Default Court Judgment, and good cause appearing,

I I I

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 1 -

Page 4: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • THE COURT FINDS IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF ON THE THIRD CAUSE 0

. 1

2 ACTION, FRAUD, AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, IN THAT:

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. Within the last three years, the Defendant, Stephane

Marchand, knowingly made false representations to Plaintiff.

a. That Defendants made these statements in an effort

mislead Plaintiff as to the worth of the

Entertainment, LLC and to mislead the Plaintiff

Defendant's role in obtaining and conducting the business

of the company in order to induce Plaintiff to enter int

the Letter of Understanding and Power of Attorne

agreements, Exhibits Al and A2 of the Complaint.

b. That Plaintiff relied on these false representations i

his decision to sign and adhere to the Letter o

Understanding and Power of Attorney agreements.

c. That Plaintiff's reliance on these false representations

was reasonable and justifiable because Defendant was th

only person working at the Sunset Towers office on

daily basis; made purchases on corporate credit cards i

Plaintiff's presence; Plaintiff knew the Sunset

office to be an exclusive and expensive business area an

the office had lavish furnishings; and Plaintiff kne

Defendants also lived in an exclusive and expensive

neighborhood; and finally, because Plaintiff did not see

the actual Secretary of State Filings for Altitud

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 2 -

Page 5: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • . 1

Entertainment, signed thes until after he LLC

2 agreements.

3 d. That as a consequence Plaintiff's reliance on Defendant's

4 false representations, Plaintiff engaged in the Letter o

5 Understanding and Power of Attorney and suffered a loss

6

of $25,000.00 with interest on the loans secured t 7

8 provide these funds.

9 2. Within the last three years, Defendant made promises t

10 Plaintiff in the Letter of Understanding and Power of Attorne

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

agreements, Exhibits Al and A2, without any intention of performin

on these promises.

a. Pursuant to the Letter of Understanding, Defendants promise

Plaintiff that Altitude Entertainment would accept all debt

created as corporate debt, and relieve the Plaintiff of all

liability from the debts incurred.

b. Pursuant to the Letter of Understanding, Defendant promise

Plaintiff to provide complete transparency with regard to

all business dealings of the company, and that Defendant

would not transfer, sale or encumber any corporate asset

without providing full disclosure of such to Plaintiff.

c. Pursuant to the Power of Attorney agreement, Defendant

promised Plaintiff that all funding, including the debt

required to fund capital for Altitude Entertainment, LLC,

would be the responsibility of the Defendant and not of th

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION. FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 3 -

Page 6: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

. 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• • Plaintiff .

d. Defendant made the promises to Plaintiff pursuant to th

contracts listed supra without any intention of performin

on them.

e. Defendant knowingly made these promises to Plaintiff becaus

Defendant drafted the contracts himself.

f. Defendants made these false promises with the purpose o

inducing Plaintiff to sign and adhere to the agreements b

providing him false assurances that the debt created fo

funding Altitude Entertainment, LLC, would become corporate

debt rather than the Plaintiff's individual responsibility.

g. To Date, Defendant have not made a single payment on th

personal loans Plaintiff incurred to provide capital fundin

for Altitude Entertainment, LLC. And Defendants have

repeatedly taken actions, sent emails and made verbal

comments indicating an intent not to make a single payment

on the debts, but rather to leave Plaintiff with the sole

responsibility for the debts.

h. To Date, Defendant have never given an accounting of the

business dealings, financial status, or the encumbrances, o

assets of Altitude Entertainment, LLC, to Plaintiff, despit

Plaintiff's repeated requests for such disclosures.

i. Plaintiff relied on the promises in his decision to sign an

adhere and perform on these agreements. And Plaintiff's

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 4 -

Page 7: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • 1

reliance was justifiable because Plaintiff had no reason t

2 doubt Defendant's truth and voracity in the promises at th

3 time he signed and agreed and performed on the contracts.

4 j. As a direct result of Plaintiff's reliance on the

5 Defendant's false promises and Plaintiff's performance unde

6 the contracts, Plaintiff suffered a loss of $25,000.00

7

8 interest on the loans secured to provide these funds.

9 3. Within the last three years, Defendant made promises t

10 Plaintiff in the Fee Agreement for New Member of

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Entertainment, LLC, in Exhibit C of the Complaint, without

intention of performing on these promises.

a. Pursuant to the Fee Agreement, Exhibit C, Defendant promise

Plaintiff to pay Plaintiff a spread of 20% of all net income

created per contract by the Plaintiff during his employment

with Altitude Entertainment.

b. Defendant made these false promises with the purpose o

inducing Plaintiff to sign and adhere to the agreements b

providing him false assurances that he would earn income

from Plaintiff's work with the Defendant and on behalf o

Altitude Entertainment, LLC.

c. Defendant made the promises to Plaintiff pursuant to the Fe

Agreement listed supra without any intention of performin

on them.

d. Defendant knowingly made these promises to Plaintiff because

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 5 -

Page 8: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 I I I

27

28 I I I

• • Defendant drafted the contracts himself.

e. To date, Defendant has not engaged in the business model h

discussed with Plaintiff by routinely refusing to pursue th

business opportunities and clients that Plaintiff has

brought to Altitude Entertainment, LLC.

f. To date, Defendant has never disclosed the business,

contracts, sources of income, or profits, of Altitude

Entertainment, LLC, to Plaintiff, nor paid him a commissio

spread on any business opportunities which Plaintiff has

brought to the company. Instead, Defendants routinely spent

the funds Plaintiff has brought to the company o

Defendant's own personal expenses.

g. Plaintiff relied on the Defendant's false promises in his

decision to sign and adhere and perform on this agreement.

And Plaintiff's reliance was justifiable because Plaintif

had no reason to doubt Defendant's truth and voracity in th

promises at the time he signed and agreed and performed o

the contracts.

h. As a direct result of Plaintiff's reliance on th

Defendant's false promises and Plaintiff's performance unde

the contracts, Plaintiff suffered a loss of $25,000.00 wit

interest on the loans secured to provide these funds.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 6 -

Page 9: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • 1

4. Within the last three years, Defendant made promises t

2 Plaintiff in the Pre-IPO Vested Interest Agreements, Exhibits G an

3 I of the Complaint, without any intention of performing on thes

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

promises.

a. Pursuant to the Pre-IPO Vested Interest Agreements, Exhibits

G and I of the Complaint, Defendants promised Plaintiff t

use the Plaintiff's funds to take Altitude Entertainment,

LLC, public through a reverse-merger process.

b. Pursuant to the Pre-IPO Vested Interest Agreements, Exhibits

G and I of the Complaint, Defendant promised Plaintiff that

the personal loans used to supply funds to Altitude

Entertainment would be characterized as company debt,

that the company would be responsible for all payments o

the loans.

c. Pursuant to the Pre-IPO Vested Interest Agreements, Exhibits

G and I of the Complaint, Defendant promised Plaintiff that

he would participate in the shareholder returns process o

Altitude Entertainment, LLC, and that Plaintiff's capital

investments into the company would entitle Plaintiff to

proportionate vested interest in the company during the

process of taking the company public.

d. Defendant made these false promises with purpose of inducin

Plaintiff to sign and adhere to the agreements by providin

him false assurances that he would earn a return on his

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 7 -

Page 10: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

• • investment from his capital funds raised for Altitud

Entertainment.

e. Defendant made the promises to Plaintiff pursuant to the

Pre-IPO Vested Interest Agreements listed supra without an

intention of performing on them.

f. Defendant knowingly made these promises to Plaintiff because

Defendant read the agreements and signed them

hand, in the presence of Plaintiff's attorney.

g. To date, Defendant has not used the funds provided b

Plaintiff to pay for the reverse-merger process of takin

Altitude Entertainment, LLC, public for these purposes.

Instead, Defendant has used the funds provided by Plaintif

for Defendant's own personal expenses, and not for th

payment of attorney fees, public relations fees, advertisin

fees, or other expenses associated with the reverse-merge

process.

h. To Date, Defendant has not made a single payment on the

personal loans Plaintiff incurred to provide capital fundin

for Altitude Entertainment, LLC. And Defendant has

repeatedly made actions, sent emails and made verbal

comments indicating an intent not to make a single payment

on the debts, but rather to leave Plaintiff with the sole

responsibility for the debts.

i. To date, Defendant has made no efforts to take Altitud

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 8 -

Page 11: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

' 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 I I I

23 I I I

24 I I I

25 I I I

26 I I I

27

28 I I I

• • Entertainment, LLC public through a reverse-merger process,

nor made any other efforts to issue shares in the company.

Instead, Defendant has written emails rescinding the intent

to do this as evinced by Defendant's email to the Plaintif

on January 4, 2 011, in Exhibit 0 of the Complaint, wher

Defendant states they would not be taking Altitud

Entertainment, LLC, through the reverse-merger process.

j. Plaintiff relied on the Defendant's false promises in his

decision to sign and adhere and perform on these agreements.

And Plaintiff's reliance was justifiable because Plaintif

had no reason to doubt Defendant's truth and voracity in th

promises at the time he signed and agreed and performed o

the contracts.

k. As a direct result of Plaintiff's reliance on the

Defendant's false promises and Plaintiff's performance unde

the contracts, Plaintiff suffered a loss of $25, 000. 00 plus

the interest accrued to date on the personal loans used t

fund Altitude Entertainment, LLC's, reverse-merger process.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 9 -

Page 12: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • • 1

2 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

3 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, ALAN MICHAE

4 REZA, an individual, and against Defendant, STEPHANE MARCHAND, a

5 individual, pursuant to the terms of Plaintiff's Application fo

6 Entry of Default Court Judgment attached hereto, including actual

7

8 damages of $25,000.00, consequential damages of $1,583.00 i

9 interest accrued to date of judgment on the Plaintiff's loa

10 agreements, and $480.00 in costs.

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. Pursuant to California Civil Code Sections 1572, 1573,

and 1692:

DATED:

a. The Court grants rescission of the Letter o

Understanding, Power of Attorney, and both Pre-IPO Veste

Interest Agreements and return of the $25,000.00 in damages t

restore Plaintiff to his original position before th

agreements; and

b. The Court grants dissolution of Plaintiff, ALA

MICHAEL REZA'S, membership in Altitude Entertainment, LLC, a

California Limited Liability Company, and removal of the

Plaintiff from the California Secretary of State Filings fo

Altitude Entertainment, LLC.

9(14/!1 ROBERT J. MOSS

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ROBERT J. MOSS

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - 10 -

Page 13: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

• • CIV-100 A TIORIIEY OR PARTY \MlHOUT A TIORNEY!lYJ:, state Bar number, and IJtJd'e$s):

1- Adriana E. Dominguez (265 ) FOR COURT USE ONLY

DOMINGUEZ LAW OFFICE 2282 La Playa Drive South Costa Mesa, CA 92627

• TELEPHONENO' (949) 860-7152 FAXNO.{Opt;oneJ}c ( 949) 666-6497 FILED e-MAJ~AOORESS to_, [email protected] AHORr.EYFORtNa-Jc Plaintiff, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF CAUFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

STREET ADDRESS:

MAIUNG ADDRESS:

700 Civic Center Drive West AUG 2 3 2011 CITY NO ZIP COCE: Santa Ana, CA 92701 ALAN CARl..;t.ON, Clsrll: gf tt. Court

BRANCH NAME: Central Justice Center PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: an individual

B'l': •t N fJQrJFMfN .i;Jf!I'UTY

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Stephane Marchand, an individual; et. al.

REQUEST FOR 0 D Cler1<'s Judgment CASE NUMBER:

Entry of Default (Application)

0 30-2011-00451527

Court Judgment 1. TO THE CLERK: On the complamt or cross-complaint filed

a. on (date): February 18, 2011 b. by (name): , an individual

c. 0 Enter default of defendant (names): Stephane Marchand, an individual

d. 0 I request a court judgment under Code of Civil Procedure sections 585(b), 585(c), 989, etc., against defendant (names):

Stephane Marchand, an individual, pursuant to the attached Declarations and Proposed Order.

(Testimony required. Apply to the clerk for a hearing date, unless the court will enter a judgment on an affidavit under Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d).)

e. D Enter clerk's judgment (1) D for restitution of the premises only and issue a writ of execution on the judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section

1174(c) does not apply. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1169.) D Include in the judgment all tenants, subtenants, named claimants, and other occupants of the premises. The

Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession was served in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 415.46.

(2) D under Code of Civil Procedure section 585(a). (Complete the declaration under Code Civ. Proc., § 585.5 on the reverse (item 5).)

(3) D for default previously entered on (date): 2. Judgment to be entered. Amount

a. Demand of complaint . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,000.00 b. Statement of damages •

(1) Special .................. . (2) General ................... .

c. Interest ...................... . d. Costs (see reve!Se) . ............ . e. Attorney fees .................. . f. TOTALS ................ .

$ $ $ 1,583.00 $480.00 $ $27 063.00

g. Daily damages were demanded in complaint at the rate of: $ (* Pe!Sonal injury or wrongful death actions; Code Civ. Proc., § 425.11.)

Credits acknowledged $0.00

$ $ $0.00 $0.00 $

$0.00

Balance $25,000.00

$ $ $ 1,583.00 $480.00 $ $27 063.00

per day beginning (date):

3. D (Check if filed in an unlawful detainer case) Legal document assistant or unlawful deta· the reverse (complete item 4). ru

Date: ~/11/Uil lo. II ' Adnana E. Dominguez, Esq. '-,.-'===~lua.~~~~~~~oqe~~:;-:-:;=:----

(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

FOR COURT USE ONLY

(1) (2)

Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CIV·100 (Rev. January 1, 2007]

Default entered as requested on (dateJAUG 2 ° 2011 Default NOT entered as requested (state reason):

ALAN ARLSON::1erk. by

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT (Application to Enter Default)

R. RENISON , Deputy

Page 1 of2

Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585-587, 1169

VMW.courtinfo.ca.gt:N

Page 14: Fraud judgement against Stephane Marchand in Anaheim school guidance counselor case

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: , an individual DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Ste hane Marchand, an individual; et. al.

CASE NUMBER;

30-2011-00451527

CIV-100

4. Legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6400 et seq.). A legal document assistant

or unlawful detainer assistant D did 0 did not for compensation give advice or assistance with this form. (If dec/atant has received any help or advice for pay from a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant, state):

a. Assistant's name: c. Telephone no.: b. Street address, city, and zip code: d. County of registration:

e. Registration no.:

f. Expires on {date):

5. 0 Declaration under Code of Civil Procedure Section 585.5 (required for entry of default under Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). This action

a. D is 0 is not on a contract or installment sale for goods or services subject to Civ. Code, § 1801 et seq. (Unruh Act). b. D is 0 is not on a conditional sales contract subject to Civ. Code, § 2981 et seq. (Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales

and Finance Act). c. 0 is 0 is not on an obligation for goods, services, loans, or extensions of credit subject to Code Civ. Proc., § 395(b).

6. Declaration of mailing (Code Civ. Proc., § 587). A copy of this Request for Entry of Default was

a. 0 not mailed to the following defendants, whose addresses are unknown to plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney (names):

b. 0 mailed first-class, postage prepaid, in a sealed envelope addressed to each defendant's attorney of record or, if none, to each defendant's last known address as follows:

(1) Mailed on (date): ...,._./\:3> /I"L 0

\, (2) To (specify names and addresses shown on the envelopes):

Stephane Marchand, 8730 Sunset Blvd., Suite 270, West Hollywood, CA 90069

7. Memorandum of costs (required if money judgment requested). Costs and disbursements are as follows (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5):

a. Clerk's filing fees

b. Process server's fees

c. Other (specify):

$395.00 $85.00 $

d .................. . ....... $ e. TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4'-'8~0"'.0"-'0'------

f. D Costs and disbursements are waived.

g. I am the attorney, agent, or party who claims these costs. To the best of my knowledge and belief this memorandum of costs is correct and these costs were necessarily incurred in this case.

I declare under penalty of pe~ury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: -:::t/ty'l..o''

Adriana E. Dominguez, Esq. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

8. ~ Declaration of nonmilitary status (required for a judgment). No defendant named in item 1c of the application is in the military service so as to be entiUed to the benefits of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S. C. App. § 501 et seq.).

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date:; --.:::r/l)l2...o\l . ! • , li

Adriana E. Dominguez, Esq. ~-l..~~r..c.""""~"""~~~-#..,~.::cp,;z,....c..__ (TYPE OR PRINT NN.-fE)

Civ-100[Rav. January 1. 2007]

• REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

(Application to Enter Default) .-