Top Banner
Experimental crosses
49

Experimental crosses

Feb 06, 2016

Download

Documents

Claire T

Experimental crosses. Inbred Strain Cross. Backcross. F2 cross. Generation. F0. F1. F2. 1400. 1200. 1000. 800. Phenotype. 600. 400. 200. 0. 0.5. AA. AB. BB. Experimental crosses. Inbred strain crosses Recombinant inbreds Alternatives. F 0 Parental Generation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Experimental crosses

Experimental crosses

Page 2: Experimental crosses

Inbred Strain Cross

Page 3: Experimental crosses

Backcross

Page 4: Experimental crosses

F2 cross

F2

F1

F0

Generation

Page 5: Experimental crosses

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0.5

Phen

otyp

e

ABAA BB

Page 6: Experimental crosses

Experimental crossesInbred strain crossesRecombinant inbredsAlternatives

Page 7: Experimental crosses

Recombinant InbredsF0 Parental Generation

F1 Generation

F2 Generation

Interbreeding for approximately 20 generations to produce recombinant inbreds

Page 8: Experimental crosses

Experimental crossesInbred strain crossesRecombinant inbredsAlternatives

Page 9: Experimental crosses

Three problems in QTL analysis

Missing genotype problemSignificance thresholdsModel selection problem

Page 10: Experimental crosses

Missing genotype problem

M1 M2 M3 Q M4 M5H A A - A AH H H - A AB B - - H H

Page 11: Experimental crosses
Page 12: Experimental crosses
Page 13: Experimental crosses

Key referencesMaximum likelihood methods

Linear regression

Imputation

Page 15: Experimental crosses

Significance Thresholds

Page 16: Experimental crosses

Significance Thresholds

Suggestive Significant Mapping method P LOD P LOD Backcross 3.40E-03 1.9 1.00E-04 3.3 Intercross (2 df) 1.60E-03 2.8 5.20E-05 4.3

Lander, E. Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results Nature Genetics. 11, 241-7, 1995

Page 17: Experimental crosses

ThresholdsPermutation test

Page 18: Experimental crosses

ThresholdsPermutation test SUBJECT.NAME Sex Phenotype m1 m2 m3 m4 F2$798 F -0.738004 -1 1 1 -1 F2$364 F 0.413330 0 0 0 0 F2$367 F 1.417480 -1 1 1 -1 F2$287 F 0.811208 1 -1 -1 1 F2$205 M 1.198270 0 0 0 0

Page 19: Experimental crosses

ThresholdsPermutation test SUBJECT.NAME Sex Phenotype m1 m2 m3 m4 F2$798 F -0.738004 -1 1 1 -1 F2$364 F 0.413330 0 0 0 0 F2$367 F 1.417480 -1 1 1 -1 F2$287 F 0.811208 1 -1 -1 1 F2$205 M 1.198270 0 0 0 0

SUBJECT.NAME Sex Phenotype m1 m2 m3 m4 F2$798 F 0.413330 -1 1 1 -1 F2$364 F 1.417480 0 0 0 0 F2$367 F 1.198270 -1 1 1 -1 F2$287 F -0.738004 1 -1 -1 1 F2$205 M 0.811208 0 0 0 0

shuffle

Page 20: Experimental crosses

Permutation tests to establish thresholds

Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mappingGA Churchill and RW Doerge

Genetics, 138, 963-971 1994

An empirical method is described, based on the concept of a permutation test, for estimating threshold values that are tailored to the experimental data at hand.

Page 21: Experimental crosses

The model problem

Page 22: Experimental crosses

The model problemLinked QTL corrupt the position estimatesUnlinked QTL decreases the power of QTL detection

Page 23: Experimental crosses

Alternative resources

Page 24: Experimental crosses

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Distance cM

LOD

Page 25: Experimental crosses

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Distance cM

LOD

Page 26: Experimental crosses
Page 27: Experimental crosses

One locus may contain many QTL

Page 28: Experimental crosses
Page 29: Experimental crosses

Genetically Heterogeneous Mice

Page 30: Experimental crosses

Pseudo-random matingfor 50 generations

Heterogeneous Stock F2 Intercross

x

Avg. Distance Between Recombinations:

F1

F2HS~2 cM

F2 intercross~30 cM

Page 31: Experimental crosses

Pseudo-random matingfor 50 generations

Heterogeneous Stock F2 Intercross

x

Avg. Distance Between Recombinations:

F1

F2HS~2 cM

F2 intercross~30 cM

Page 32: Experimental crosses

Hidden Chromosome Structure

Observed chromosome structure

Multipoint method (HAPPY) calculates the probability that an allele descends from a founder

using multiple markers

Page 33: Experimental crosses

single marker association

Page 34: Experimental crosses

single marker associationHAPPY method

Page 35: Experimental crosses

Many peaks

mean red cell volume

Page 36: Experimental crosses

Linkage disequilibrium

Page 37: Experimental crosses

Mouse F2 population:

LD on chromosome 1

Page 38: Experimental crosses

A/J AKR/J BALB/cJ C3H/HeJ C57BL/6J CBA/J DBA/2J LP/J

Mouse Heterogenenous Stock: LD on chromosome 11

Page 39: Experimental crosses

Mapping in structured populations by resample model averaging.Valdar W, Holmes CC, Mott R, Flint J.Genetics. 2009 Aug;182(4):1263-77.

Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping.Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM, Kirby A, Heckerman D, Daly MJ, Eskin E. Genetics. 2008 Mar;178(3):1709-23.

Page 40: Experimental crosses
Page 41: Experimental crosses

LD on chromosome 11 in three outbred stocks

Page 42: Experimental crosses

LD on chromosome 11 in three outbred stocks

Page 43: Experimental crosses
Page 44: Experimental crosses
Page 45: Experimental crosses
Page 46: Experimental crosses

Imputation of genomes

Page 47: Experimental crosses

SleepVocalization

Dissection16 weeks 21 weeks

HypoxiaEcho/ECG

Basal ActivityStartle PPIFear ConditioningSwim test

Elevated Plus MazeOpen Field TestNeophagia

Crl:CFW(SW)

DNABrainBloodSpleenLimbsTail fibroblastsEarsLiverAdrenalsLungsHeart

x 2000

Phenotyping pipeline

Page 48: Experimental crosses

FACS:CD4/CD8 ratio

H2-Ea

Scarb1

Biochemistry:Total Cholesterol

Page 49: Experimental crosses