Top Banner

Click here to load reader

Exec Guide to Slashing s Ware Dev Costs

Nov 24, 2015




How to reduce software development costs by 80%.

  • The Executive Guide to Slashing Software Development Costs

    How to reduce software development costs by 80%.

    Utopia? No just the modernisation of

    out-dated software development methods.

    An eBook by

    Ken Galbraith

    A no-holds-barred look at current IT practices and the impact they have on


    By k.g

  • Copyright 2013 by K M Galbraith. All rights reserved.

    This eBook may be downloaded and circulated in its published form.

    No extracts may be used without the authors permission.


    This book is based on the personal experiences of the author.

    Outcomes and productivity gains may vary in other organisations.

    Experiences relating to Circatec clients or other parties have been changed to the extent

    required to avoid identifying the other party.

    All research material is from publically available sources.


    CA, CA Plex and Plex are trademarks of CA Technologies.

    XSOL InOrder is a trademark of XSOL Limited.

    Additional copies:

    Copies of this eBook can be obtained from Circatecs web site:

  • Contents

    Introduction 1

    Software excellence 2

    The current state 3

    The traditional software development life cycle (SDLC) 3

    The Agile software development life cycle (SDLC) 4

    Over reliance on methodology 5

    Cant I just send it offshore? 7

    The fundamental flaw 7

    There is a better way 8

    Automated software development tools 8

    Application development 8

    Rules Engines 10

    Benefits of automated software development 11

    Managing automated development projects 13

    Requirements gathering 13

    Architecture and design 14

    User interface and patterns 15

    Development teams 16

    Planning automated software development 17

    The benefits are enormous 18

    It doesnt stop here 19

    The larger the development the greater the savings 19

    Compelling case for change 20

    How corporate IT resists change 21

    Common practices used to maintain control 22

    I can do it just as quickly by hand! 24

    The CEOs toolkit 24

    Bringing about change 25

    Structure 25

    Existing systems 26

    What about work-in-progress? 26

    Resistance to change 26

    Be prepared to start again 27

    What will it take? 28

    Change will occur when change is demanded. 28

    About the author 29

  • Page 1

    Introduction Fundamentally the way software is developed and delivered hasnt changed in 40 years.

    Over the last ten to fifteen years tools and methodologies to dramatically streamline software

    development have been maturing in function and sophistication.

    And yet the software industry has been able to resist change. It is reasonable to say that no

    other industry has been able to resist change for so long and get away with it.

    The impact on an organisations ability to deliver, adapt and take advantage of the rapidly

    changing commercial and legislative environment is severe. In many instances IT dictates

    corporate agility and speed to market.

    While boards and CEOs require system agility and quick response to changing requirements,

    their IT department often remains inflexible and resistant to change.

    IT departments are empowered and trusted by their organisation to provide software and

    technology solutions for the benefit of the organisation. Far too often they fail this trust by

    blocking new ways and technologies, often using dismissive statements that, if challenged,

    cannot be justified mostly however, they go unchallenged.

    Too often Corporate IT is making key and fundamental decisions that have a significant

    impact on the business and there is no mechanism in place to hold them to account. The

    business managers most affected are seldom engaged in these decisions and are, therefore,

    unaware of the alternative solutions available to them.

    In 2005 Gartner Group (a leading technology trend forecaster) forecast that 40% of IT job roles

    as they existed then would be lost to automation. They went on to forecast that more

    American IT jobs would be lost to automation than to outsourcing. The most significant

    forecast was that between 2005 and 2010 the productivity of IT workers would increase by a

    factor of 10.

    Today, some 8 years later, the uptake of automation tools and agile methodologies has

    effectively been ignored (the generous view) or blocked (in my experience) by the broader IT


    The impact is much more than just high cost and long delivery cycles for software

    development, there is a very significant impact on operating costs when systems are out of

    step with organisational needs.

    This book looks at the current state of software development and then explores commercially

    available and proven alternatives before discussing how to bring about significant change.

    Let me clear here. The change I am talking about is a fundamental shift in the way we design,

    develop and deliver software applications.

    If we keep doing the same things we will continue to get the same results.

    If we want to change the outcome we must change how things are done.

  • Page 2

    Software excellence We need to understand what constitutes excellent enterprise software in order to objectively

    look at the tools and methodologies used to develop an enterprise application.

    User experience The software must be easy to use and enhance the users undertaking

    of their everyday job functions.

    This means the software must be intuitive to use and reflective of the

    enterprise business processes.

    In high work load environments the software is so well aligned to the

    process that user interaction with the application is highly efficient.

    Value add The software must add value to the organisation by providing a more

    efficient workplace, eliminating error and waste, enhancing the

    customer experience, reducing corporate or financial risk, and other

    tangible organisational benefits.

    Flexible The ability to adapt to changing organisational demands is critical to

    the long term value of the software.

    Reliable The software must be available and run consistently day after day.

    Other than infrastructure problems the software availability should be

    100%. Transactional processing must be so consistent that once

    audited subsequent transactions are accepted as correct.

    Secure Security in this context is related to the validation of transactions to

    ensure data and transactional accuracy. Protections around the

    maintenance of data to prevent malicious transactions or accidental

    data errors. Incoming electronic data files must pass through

    validation filters before being posted to the database.

    Cost effective The cost of development must pass a business test. Implementation of

    the software must be efficient and the ongoing cost of maintenance,

    including changes and enhancements, must be relative to the value

    the software is delivering to the organisation.

    Scalable The ability of the organisation to grow and/or expand its products and

    services must not be hampered by limitations in the softwares ability

    to process the increased volumes of transactions.

    The tools, standards and methodologies adopted by corporate IT and their service providers

    must be totally aligned to the delivery software excellence as judged by the organisation

    they serve.

    The sole measure of successful software is the value it brings to the organisation.

  • Page 3

    The current state The traditional software development life cycle (SDLC)

    The waterfall approach to software development has been around since the early 1970s and is

    still widely used today. It is a sequential design and development methodology as shown in

    this flow chart.

    The waterfall model assumes each stage is complete before proceeding to the next.

    RequirementsAnalysis &


    Architecture & components



    VerificationTest & install

    MaintenanceModifications &


    Because Waterfall is sequential it is impossible to go back. The assumption is that the

    requirements gathering is an accurate and complete reflection of the requirement (which it

    seldom is) and the design is an accurate reflection of the requirement.

    The advantages of Waterfall are:

    It enforces discipline, every stage has a start and end and progress can be monitored

    through the use of milestones.

    There is considerable documentation which minimises the impact of staff turnover

    on the project.

    The client (external or internal business unit) knows what to expect. The detailed

    specifications describe what the software will do on completion.

    The disadvantages of Waterfall are:

    Change of requirements is difficult to manage due to the large amount of


    Once a stage has been completed it is difficult to go back.

    If a specification error or change is required the project must go back to the


    Bugs and design flaws arent identified until after the entire application has been


  • Page 4

    The disconnect

    As waterfall moves from one phase to another it engages different d

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.