This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Establishing and Maintaining
A UV Process Window
Author
- Raji Koshy
Abstract
Establishing and Maintaining a UV System
Defining and documenting the variables in your UV process will allow you to have a better understanding of your
operation. Establishing and maintaining a process window or ‘zone’ where your UV process works best will
optimize production and reduce waste. This paper reviews what needs to be defined, documented and measured to
establish and maintain a process window with a performance log. It also discusses proper use of measurement
the irradiance in W/cm2/nm, which is the irradiance for a very narrow spectral bandwidth-
often 5 nanometers or less. Profiling radiometers can provide the irradiance and radiant
energy density figures while also profiling the irradiance as a function of time. This is useful
when looking at multi-lamp systems and also for determining if a lamp system is running in
or out of focus.
Absolute reading instruments allow easier comparison between different UV systems,
different locations and between suppliers-customers; for example, a coating formulator and
user of the material. Caution needs to be exercised when making comparisons between
different brands of absolute instruments. Different manufacturers look at different portions
and bandwidths in the UV portion of the spectrum.
Relative instruments provide feedback to the user on the relative intensity of UV reaching
the sensor. A display, monitor or output signal is adjusted (often to 100%) when conditions
are ideal (clean reflector, new bulb). The display will change as the relative intensity of the
UV changes. Relative monitors are good for measuring UV on systems where the process
window is small, where an absolute radiometer cannot be passed through or inserted into
the system or where continuous feedback of the process is needed. Unless the readings are
coordinated with an absolute reading radiometer, it is harder to make direct comparisons
between different systems and communicate with suppliers because ‘100%’ on one system
may not equate to ‘100%’ on a second system. Relative instruments or instruments inserted
in the process are also dependent on the location of the sensor.
Irradiance and Radiant Energy Density
In an ideal world, your UV system would be matched to your formulation. Testing involving
the formulator, substrate supplier, equipment supplier and UV system supplier would be
coordinated and the equipment and chemistry matched to each other. The UV system would
actually be one of the last items purchased and it would match or exceed the requirements
of the process.
In the real world, UV systems are often purchased first or an older existing system is
adapted to a new process. One of the important considerations when adapting a UV system
to a process is whether or not it has enough UV irradiance to not only perform the job, but to
do it at a production speed that makes economic sense.
UV arriving at the substrate surface is reflected, absorbed, scattered and transmitted
through the coating to the substrate. If coating thickness is the same, it is generally easier
13
to cure a clear UV varnish than an opaque color because the UV is more easily transmitted
throughout the clear coating. With a clear coating, it is not unusual for a majority of UV light
striking the top surface to penetrate through the coating and be available for reacting with
the coating at the substrate level. With an opaque color, only a small percentage of the UV
striking the surface will reach the substrate level. Increasing the coating thickness will
dramatically reduce the amount of UV that reaches the substrate.
UV irradiance is important in your process because it provides the ‘punch’ to:
Penetrate through opaque and pigmented coatings
Give depth of cure
Allow adhesion to the substrate
It is important to determine the minimum irradiance value needed for your process. Staying
above the minimum will allow you to get the adhesion and penetration through your coating.
Remember that the longer wavelengths (UVV) have better chance at penetration than the
shorter wavelengths (UVC). Often times the UV system with the higher irradiance will allow
you to run at faster belt speeds. Higher irradiance values may also increase cure rate
efficiencies.
A radiometer can report the highest irradiance measured (peak irradiance) and/or a profile
of the irradiance over time (irradiance profile). In processes where multiple UV lamp systems
are used, a profile of the irradiance over time will allow the user to confirm that each lamp
system is performing as designed.
The radiant energy density is important for total and complete UV cure. Historically, the UV
radiant energy density (dose) has been the only UV exposure guide number supplied by
formulators. Recently, some formulators have also started supplying the irradiance value
required for a particular coating.
It is also important to determine the minimum radiant energy density value needed for your
process.
Establishing and Maintaining Process Control or Process Window
The best time to establish process control or a process window is when things are working.
Trying to establish process control when things are not working (and a big job is due) is
frustrating. Calling to purchase a radiometer for overnight delivery when your line is down
will only tell you the current irradiance and radiant energy density on your system, not the
conditions when things were curing.
14
Establishing and documenting process control takes work and it takes time. Consider it an
investment or establishment of a solid foundation that will pay you back down the road
when things are not working. Coordinate operator training and procedure documentation
with your work to establish process control.
Most applications are concerned with defining the lower limits at which a process will work.
At what point do you reach an under cure situation? To find this point, run tests in which
you gradually increase the line speed until you produce an under cure situation. Document
this failure point by recording the parameters - irradiance, radiant energy density, power
applied to the system, line speed. This line is the ‘red-yellow’ interface on the diagram. If
you like to live on the edge, the point of under cure is the point where you need to stop
production and correct the situation. I suggest building a ‘yellow’ cushion or caution zone of
approximately 20% on your process window that allows for slight changes during a
production run. Above the caution area is the green ‘go’ zone. I always want to start a new
job in the green zone and hopefully also wind up the job run in the green zone. Once you
know your system, you will be able to anticipate slight changes that may cause you to drift
into the yellow caution zone. The job should be able to continue running if you move into the
yellow caution zone but I would never start a new job unless my system is in the green zone.
15
Is there such a thing as too much UV? Formulators will argue that from a chemistry
standpoint there is no such thing as ‘over curing’ or too much UV. Maybe a better term
would be ‘over temperature’ of the substrate. The purpose of mentioning ‘over cure’ is not
to open a discussion on UV chemistry mechanics but to point out that some applications
may have to monitor the process ‘overcuring-overtemperature’ situations. If your substrate
is heat sensitive, work with your UV equipment suppliers to minimize the amount of infrared
reaching the substrate. You may also want to establish an upper process limit for some
applications. Instead of increasing the line speed and documenting changes, slow down the
line speed until you reach a point that causes you to reject the product. Document this point
and build in a caution zone, much as you did for the under cure point.
How often should you monitor and take UV readings? By the job? Hour? Shift? Day? There is
no easy answer and you will have to let the information that you collect and your process
dictate the frequency of readings. It is easier to collect more readings at first to establish a
baseline with the idea that you can always back off later in the frequency of readings after
you look for trends in the data.
If you only remember one thing from this article remember that:
16
UV measurement can’t help you unless you
document and record the readings!
Job, Performance or Process Control Logs
Your Job Log is your record documenting the performance of your UV system and your
process. It is a place to keep performance information on your system that can be referred
to when things are not working. Keeping a Job Log is not rocket science. It requires a
dedicated clipboard, log sheet designed for your equipment and the discipline to take and
record readings. A Job Log can easily be customized with a word processing or spreadsheet
program. Keep the clipboard in the same place and record information only on the log,
avoiding the urge to keep information on small scraps of paper. Assign ‘ownership’ or
responsibility of the Job Log to a specific individual in your company
Suggested Steps if your process is not working or you are outside the Process
Window
1. If the process window has been documented and readings have been taken on a regular
basis, relax and breathe deep and review your Job Log. Was it a gradual change over
time towards the identified caution area or was it a sudden change? Any changes to the
process? Equipment? Suppliers?
2. If you have not been keeping track of things or have not yet done your work on
establishing your process window:
Start asking for help from the UV Cure God(s). The amount of help requests
goes up as the production throughput goes down.
Hope that your boss buys your story that it is a supplier problem (bad batch of
coating, substrate problem)
Call the supplier back, apologize for blaming them, beg for their help after you
find that it is not a supplier related problem
Start polishing your resume.
3. Confirm key equipment settings: Measure UV levels to double check or confirm current
readings. (How did UV lamp station #3 on system #1 get switched to 200 WPI instead of
400 WPI?)
17
4. Perform UV system maintenance: Observe all safety precautions, follow manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures to check and clean the reflectors, rotate the bulbs,
check cooling and air flow on the housing
5. Measure the UV again, looking for improvement and movement back within the process
window
6. Replace UV bulbs or adjust key equipment variables until you are back in your process
window
7. Work and communicate with all suppliers in good times and bad times
.
18
Date
Line Speed /Dwell TimeFeet /minute UV System_____________ Lamp___________________ Other Other
Signature
Indicated ConfirmedPower
AppliedWPI
HourMeter
UV IrradianceW or mW/cm2
UV Radiant Energy Density (Dose)
J or mJ/cm2
SAMPLE UV JOB LOGSet up a custom Job Log for your facility and equipment using a spreadsheet or word processing program. Identify the most important variables for your process and include these on the log. Each lamp system should have a place for UV measurements to be recorded. The frequency (hourly, daily, weekly) of measurements can be determined as you build up information on your process over time. Work with your suppliers and quality control to determine what should be included in the ‘other’ columns for your particular process. Examples for the ‘other’ include pass/fail tests to confirm product quality (adhesion, hardness, flexibility, gloss, texture, stain or scratch resistance, chemical rub, cross hatch, abrasion rub, color ID, registration) and formulation application information.
Daily/Weekly UV Job Log ______________
19
Understanding Measurement and Instrumentations
Expectations of UV measurement instruments often exceed their actual performance.
Users expect overall performance to be within a small fraction of a percent, similar to
a precision thermometer or voltmeter. Users also introduce errors in the readings
based on how the data is collected. Unrealistic expectations along with errors
introduced with collection techniques can lead to perceived problems with the
instrument. It is important to understand and use your instrument properly and also
use data collection techniques consistent with the instrument. When making
comparisons between instruments, make sure that you are making ‘apples to apples’
and not ‘apples to oranges’ comparisons.
Why do readings differ between instruments? What are some of the things to keep in
mind when making and comparing readings from UV measurement instruments?
Bandwidth Variation Manufacturers have different spectral bandwidths in their
instruments and it is often hard to directly compare one brand of instruments to
another because of these differences. Some instruments are classified as narrow
band while others are broadband instruments. The EIT UVA bandwidth measures
between 320-390 nm and the response is centered at 365 nm. The International
Light (IL) UVA bandwidth response is also centered at 365 nm but measures UV
light between 250-415 nm. The spectral response of each instrument is different
and users need to understand these differences and that different is not
necessarily wrong.
Many times it becomes important to not only communicate a number value (900
mJ/cm2) but also the instrument in which the data was collected. Dick Stowe of
Fusion UV Systems has suggested adding either the bandwidth and/or
manufacturer to assist communication and avoid misunderstandings. A radiant
energy density measurement that is stated as 900 mJ/cm2 (EIT UVA) or 900 mJ/cm2
(320-390 nm) is much more specific and descriptive than 900 mJ/cm2.
Filter and Detector Specifications Even within a single manufacturer’s line of
products it is normal to expect small variations in the optical performance of any
of the optical components that the UV passes through. Making of the filter,
detector and other components is an art and it is normal to expect small
variations in the performance between two filters. Most instrument manufacturers
20
test individual optical components and accept only those that meet their criteria.
Requiring even tighter specifications or tolerances on optical components could
easily price the instruments out of the range of all but a few users.
Data Collection Speeds Many people mistakenly believe that their UV
instrument has to collect data at the same speed as their production process in
order to get useful results. When the production speed is relatively slow, this is
not a problem but when production speeds increase the instrument can be fooled.
Imagine trying to predict the outcome of a national election by sampling only a
few voters at one voting location. There would be times when the small sample
pool correctly predicts the election outcome and there would be times when it
was wrong. Increasing the number of voters sampled along with the number of
voting locations would improve the odds of predicting the correct winner.
The relationship between line speed and the amount of UV (radiant energy
density-Joules/cm2) reaching your substrate is inversely proportional. Doubling the
line speed will cut in half the radiant energy density or dose. This inverse
relationship between radiant energy density and belt speed allows UV
measurements to be made at slower line speeds and extrapolated out if needed
to faster production speeds.
The linear distance that a product travels through UV is relatively small compared
to the total distance it may move on a production line. The total linear travel
distance under a reflector from a single UV lamp system does not generally
exceed 12-18”. Often times, it is much less, especially if the system is set-up as a
focused system. On a highly focused UV system with an elliptical reflector, the
most intense linear band of UV radiation is no more than an inch, maybe two in
length.
For repeatable, reliable results, a UV Instrument needs to collect an adequate
number of samples. Some production speeds have moved to the point where the
instrument collects samples under the most intense peak one run but just misses
the most intense point on the next run. This can lead to wide variations in the
reported irradiance value for a system.
Sample rates in UV Instruments have increased with advances in electronics.
Older instruments with slower sample rates have given way to a new generation
21
of products that can sample up to 2048 times a second. Slower sampling
instruments can still be used as long as you observe their ‘speed’ limits. Check
with the instrument manufacturer.
22
Out of band rejection rates The way that your instrument deals with energy
outside the band you are looking at can influence the readings. How well does the
instrument reject UV that is out of specified bandwidth?
Temperature Wide swings in the temperature of the photo detector(s) used in
instruments can lead to differences between readings. Check with your
instrument manufacturer- the response of detectors varies as the temperature
increases. Repeated, long, slow data collection runs under intense multi-lamp UV
As belt speed increases, the irradiance values in the slower sampling (25/sec) UviCure Plus vary more than the irradiance values in the faster sampling (2048/sec) PowerMAP. Radiant energy values track well for both instruments. Results can also vary based on the system is set-up to run ‘in’ or ‘out’ of focus. For consistent results, do not exceed the speed limit of your instrument.
23
sources tend to increase the temperature of the detector and cause small
variations in the amount of UV. Let the radiometer cool for a few minutes
between runs and try to be consistent when making repeated, long, slow readings
under intense sources.
Calibration Sources Calibrating an instrument to one type of spectral source
(mercury) and then using it under a second source (additive bulb) can lead to
small differences in the readings. If you will consistently use the radiometer
under a specific lamp source, ask the manufacturer to calibrate the instrument
under that type of source.
Instrument Ranges Make sure the dynamic range of the instrument matches
the irradiance levels of the system that you will use it on. Instruments designed
for low intensity sources like exposure machines will not always work on high
intensity sources used for curing coatings. Any questions, check with the
instrument manufacturer
Spatial Response The spatial response of an instrument describes how the
instrument handles light coming from different angles and is measured by the
optics in the unit. Most instruments try to approximate a cosine response in the
optics. Most coatings and formulations respond in a cosine manner to the UV
reaching their surface. Some instruments are specialized or have unique optics
designs that may not have a cosine response.
Electronics Differences in the electronics between instruments can cause one
instrument to reach threshold and start counting UV while another instrument
needs a higher irradiance value to reach threshold and count. Once an instrument
reaches threshold, it normally counts all UV past that particular point. If the optics
and electronics in one instrument are set up with a threshold of 40mW and
another instrument has a threshold of 2mW, slight differences can be expected
between the two readings, especially when the process speed is very slow and
the UV system is of low intensity.
Differences in the electronics of radiometers can result in one instrument counting both areas while a second instrument only counts the area after the 40mW threshold is reached.
24
Unit Values The development of radiometers that sample at 2048
samples/second, has enabled users to ‘see’ more of what is going on inside a UV
system. Faster sampling radiometers are able to ‘see’ the UV bulb cycling ‘on and
off’ as the alternating power supply cycles. The faster collections rates have
enabled the instruments to capture this cycling at its peak moment and report
this ‘peak’ irradiance value instead of an ‘RMS’ or ‘average peak’ value that is
obtained with instruments that sample slower. Communicate clearly so that
everyone understands what is being reported.
Conclusions
1. Establishing, documenting and maintaining your UV process window will allow
you to save time and money through:
25
Manufacture of consistent products
Reduced waste and sacrificial items
Preventative and predictive maintenance on your UV systems
Full use of the life of your UV bulbs-replace when needed and not
before
Enhanced communication and partnership with you suppliers
2. Establish ownership of the UV process in your facility. Appoint a person or
team to document and record the process variables and readings on a regular
basis to establish a baseline, and information to turn to when things are stop
working
3. Use your UV measurement equipment properly and in the manner in which it
was designed.
4. Decide how you will communicate both in your facility and with your suppliers.
5. Communicate with your suppliers on a regular basis, not just when you are
having problems.
Author’s Biography:
Jim Raymont is the Director of the Instrument Markets Group at Electronic
Instrumentation and Technology (EIT). EIT provides electronic manufacturing services
(contract manufacturing and electronic engineering) to a variety of industries. The
Instrument Markets Group of EIT specializes in UV Instrumentation and incorporates
over sixteen (16) years of UV Measurement experience. EIT produces both
radiometers and continuous on-line monitoring equipment. EIT products provide
process control for UV applications. The products can be used to establish, monitor,
maintain and control UV conditions. The products can also assist with the design of
UV systems.
Jim has been with EIT for over eight years and has been involved with the Instrument
Market group for five years. He has worked with a variety of customers worldwide in
several different industries that share the common need to measure and control UV
in their process. Prior to joining the Instrument Market Group of EIT, Jim spent ten
26
years in technical sales, marketing and management and six years as a high school
science educator. He holds a BS in Science Education from the Ohio State University.