Top Banner
EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE) December 2012 EASA.2011.OP.28
25

EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Roland Long
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan & Way Forward

EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28)

Presented by

Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

December 2012

EASA.2011.OP.28

Page 2: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContent

• Context

• HIWC – Key Facts & Status

• Contingency Plan(s)

• Conclusion & Way Forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 2

Page 3: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContent

• Context

• HIWC – Key Facts & Status• Contingency Plan(s)• Conclusion & Way Forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 3

Page 4: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContext

• Motivation to use F20 in addition to G-II Retrieve in situ IWC on F20 flight level (-50°C, -30°C, -10°C). Validate the Doppler cloud radar estimates of IWC in HighIWC regions

(retrieved from reflectivity and Doppler velocity) using G-II and Falcon 20 in situ data.

And use the validated radar estimates to take advantage of the vertical resolution of the cloud radar to extrapolate the IWC & PSD in situ data (G II & F20 trajectories) for the new icing envelope calculations.

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 4

CDP-ROBUST

CPI ImagerPIP

2D-S

Nevzorov & RICE

Page 5: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContent

• Context

• HIWC – Key Facts & Status

• Contingency Plan(s)• Conclusion & Way Forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 5

Page 6: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingHIWC

• Status in July/August 2012 Primary Campaign delayed by one year

(2013 -> 2014) because workmanship and QA lapses at FTA led to stop work and investigation/corrective action planning

• Planning A/C Modification completed by end January

2013 Instrumentation checks, calibrations, … (Jan-

April, 2013) Ground testing (April 2013) Qualification Flights (April-June 2013) Trial Campaign (Florida, August 2013) Instrumentation repair/modification period

(Sept-Nov, 2013) Primary Campaign (Darwin, Jan-March 2014)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 6

Federal AviationAdministration

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

High Ice Water Content (HIWC)

Flight Campaign Status

Page 7: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingHIWC

• Status in September 2012 On September 18th NASA management,

procurement and legal personnel visited FTA. They briefed NASA on FTA's financial capability as it relates to its ability to perform the contract.

On September 25th FTA communicated to their employees not to report to work until further notice.

To reduce risk exposure to NASA and its partners all government (and partner) provided equipment at FTA were moved to the fullest extent possible to NASA DFRC for storage. Shipment of equipment started on September 26th.

• Note: EASA-HighIWC / HIWC / HAIC meeting held on September 24th, 2012 with the objective to review contingency plan(s) and define way forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 7

Federal AviationAdministration

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

High Ice Water Content (HIWC)

Flight Campaign Status

Page 8: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingHIWC

• Status in October 2012 On October 19, 2012 NASA issued a contract

termination notice to Flight Test Associates. NASA and Environment Canada have secured

all equipment on the aircraft including the instrument racks and associated avionics. Some items were not removed from the aircraft (i.e. satcom antenna) as they were too integrated into the aircraft.

Threshold Aviation Group (TAG) ferried the Gulfstream N81RR to the Chino Airport on November 3rd, 2012

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 8

Federal AviationAdministration

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

High Ice Water Content (HIWC)

Flight Campaign Status

Page 9: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingHIWC

• Status in November 2012 HIWC Progress meeting held on 01/11/2012 HIWC Progress meeting held on 08/11/2012 NASA/FAA Top Management meeting held on

November 20th, 2012– No viable options for the G-II, or other NASA

A/C, to support a 2014 field campaign– The only viable option for a backup to the G-II

contract aircraft is the High Altitude Ice Crystal (HAIC) European Union project Falcon 20 atmospheric research platform pending IKP re-design and additional F/H

– Although the Falcon-20 will address many HIWC objectives, the G-2 is also required to fulfill un-addressed or incompletely addressed objectives as defined in Engine Harmonization WG meetings and the HIWC Science Plan

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 9

Federal AviationAdministration

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

High Ice Water Content (HIWC)

Flight Campaign Status

Page 10: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingHIWC

• Status in November 2012 NASA/FAA Top Management meeting held on

November 20th, 2012 / CONCLUSION– Both Associate Administrators ( FAA- Aviation

Safety and NASA- Aeronautics) support the objectives of the HIWC flight research project and the continued development of an aircraft option (the G-II is the most likely candidate) for a full complement of instruments to conduct a field campaign in ice crystal environments.  It is presumed at this time that path will take at least until 2015 and could have more than one deployment.

– The outcome of the Falcon 20 contingency discussions is that both the Associate Administrators want some additional information before a final decision can be made

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 10

Federal AviationAdministration

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

High Ice Water Content (HIWC)

Flight Campaign Status

Page 11: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContent

• Context• HIWC – Key Facts & Status

• Contingency Plan(s)

• Conclusion & Way Forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 11

Page 12: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 12

Contingency Plan(s)

Option A Option B Option C Option D

Description: Nominal plan ; both F20 and G-II on time and ready for 2014 Darwin primary field campaign

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20? ; Additional F/H? ; delay in G-II preparation trial campaign or/and limited payload

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Worst scenario ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP can’t be installed on F20; Additional F/H? G-II not available ;

Assumption(s):•G-II is the primary A/C equiped with probes, IKP, Ka band radar, HWL RDR-4000 radar•F20 is the secondary A/C equiped with probes and RASTA radar (IKP, F/H option)

Assumption(s):• F20 Primary A/C equipped with probes, RASTA radar and IKP IKP ; Additional F/H•G-II secondary A/C equipped with probes, IKP, (Ka band radar), HWL RDR-4000 radar

Assumption(s):•F20 Primary A/C equipped with probes, RASTA radar and IKP ; Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•F20 Primary A/C equipped with probes, RASTA radar ; Additional F/H?

Impact(s): NO Impact(s): YES (limited) Impact(s): YES (medium) Impact(s): YES (high)

Page 13: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 13

Contingency Plan(s)

Option A Option B Option C.1 Option D

Description: Nominal plan ; both F20 and G-II on time and ready for 2014 Darwin primary field campaign

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20? ; Additional F/H? ; delay in G-II preparation trial campaign or/and limited payload

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Worst scenario ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP can’t be installed on F20; Additional F/H? G-II not available ;

Assumption(s):•G-II is the primary A/C equiped with probes, IKP, Ka band radar, HWL RDR-4000 radar•F20 is the secondary A/C equiped with probes and RASTA radar (IKP, F/H option)

Assumption(s):• F20 Primary A/C equipped with probes, RASTA radar and IKP IKP ; Additional F/H•G-II secondary A/C equipped with probes, IKP, (Ka band radar), HWL RDR-4000 radar

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Feasibility demonstrated: second IKP to be designed and manufactured for installation on F20•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•F20 Primary A/C equipped with probes, RASTA radar ; Additional F/H?

Impact(s): NO Impact(s): YES (limited) Impact(s): YES (medium) Impact(s): YES (high)

Page 14: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 14

Contingency Plan(s)

Option C.1 Option C.2

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Feasibility demonstrated: second IKP to be designed and manufactured for installation on F20•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Major change(s) requested wrt installation : strong support from HIWC requested in order to adapt IKP design (wiring, …)• Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (medium) Impact(s): YES (high)

• IKP Re-design

• Status: NRC completed assessment of IKP re-design to meet Falcon 20 pylon structural, drag, and electrical limits: IKP re-design can meet Falcon 20 constraints to operate on their aircraft

• Issue: FAA/NASA Associate Administrators want some additional information before a final decision can be made regarding additional funding

Weight: 57kg External Diam: 225mm

Length: 1.85mPower: 5kW

Weight: 30kg External Diam: 176mm

Length: 1.00mPower: 2.5kW

Page 15: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

Contingency Plan(s)

Option C.1 Option C.2 Option D.1 Option D.2

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Worst scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; reconcilliation IKP/Robust after the field campaign

Description: Catastrophic scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; No reconcilliation IKP/Robust

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Feasibility demonstrated: second IKP to be designed and manufactured for installation on F20•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Major change(s) requested wrt installation : strong support from HIWC requested in order to adapt IKP design (wiring, …)• Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•To correlate IKP and ROBUST probe after the 2014 Darwin F/T campaign: dedicated campaign or 2016 HAIC F/T campaign

•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP can’t be installed•No reconciliation robust/IKP possible•Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (medium) Impact(s): YES (high) Impact(s): YES (very high) Impact(s): YES (campaign postponed)

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 15

Page 16: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 16

Contingency Plan(s)

Option C.1 Option C.2

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Feasibility demonstrated: second IKP to be designed and manufactured for installation on F20•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Major change(s) requested wrt installation : strong support from HIWC requested in order to adapt IKP design (wiring, …)• Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (medium) Impact(s): YES (high)

• IKP Re-design

• Status: NRC completed assessment of IKP re-design to meet Falcon 20 pylon structural, drag, and electrical limits: IKP re-design can meet Falcon 20 constraints to operate on their aircraft

• Issue: FAA/NASA Associate Administrators want some additional information before a final decision can be made regarding additional funding

Weight: 57kg External Diam: 225mm

Length: 1.85mPower: 5kW

Weight: 30kg External Diam: 176mm

Length: 1.00mPower: 2.5kW

Page 17: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 17

Contingency Plan(s)

Option D.1 Option D.2

Description: Worst scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; reconcilliation IKP/Robust after the field campaign

Description: Catastrophic scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; No reconcilliation IKP/Robust

Assumption(s):•To correlate IKP and ROBUST probe after the 2014 Darwin F/T campaign: dedicated campaign or 2016 HAIC F/T campaign

•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP can’t be installed•No reconciliation robust/IKP possible•Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (very high)

Impact(s): YES (campaign postponed)

• HIWC position Two international partners stated

that if NASA cannot complete a 2014 field campaign, they do not think their management will support further delays. These partners are critical to the HIWC team success

• HAIC Position HAIC agreed to support the 2014

Darwin Campaign Associated delay mitigated

thanks to further use of Airbus F/T campaign (Darwin, Cayenne, Chile)

Further delay will not be acceptable

Page 18: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 18

Contingency Plan(s)

Option D.1 Option D.2

Description: Worst scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; reconcilliation IKP/Robust after the field campaign

Description: Catastrophic scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; No reconcilliation IKP/Robust

Assumption(s):•To correlate IKP and ROBUST probe after the 2014 Darwin F/T campaign: dedicated campaign or 2016 HAIC F/T campaign

•Additional F/H?

Assumption(s):•IKP can’t be installed•No reconciliation robust/IKP possible•Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (very high)

Impact(s): YES (campaign postponed)

• HIWC position Two international partners stated

that if NASA cannot complete a 2014 field campaign, they do not think their management will support further delays. These partners are critical to the HIWC team success

• HAIC Position HAIC agreed to support the 2014

Darwin Campaign Associated delay mitigated

thanks to further use of Airbus F/T campaign (Darwin, Cayenne, Chile)

Further delay will not be acceptable

Page 19: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

• Remaining Scenarios / Option C.1

• IKP Redesign feasibility completed NRC confirmed that IKP re-design can meet F20 requirements IKP should be available in Summer 2013 for installation and

certification on F20

• Support from HAIC and HIWC teams

• Preliminary F20 payload defined

• Open Points FAA funding for IKP re-design

– Re-affirm that the FAA sponsors still support the flight campaign and the mitigation strategies being developed.

– Review how those mitigation strategies will be implemented/supported within the FAA

– Work with HIWC science team members to provide a complete description of what the Falcon 20 would deliver in 2014 to both the new rulemaking Appendix D for ice crystals and how this flight campaign could address current fleet issues for mitigating the ice crystal threat

Funding for additional F/H

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 19

Contingency Plan(s)

Option C.1

Description: Degraded plan ; F20 on time and ready for 2014 F/T campaign ; IKP on F20 ; Additional F/H? ; G-II not available

Assumption(s):•IKP installation - Feasibility demonstrated: second IKP to be designed and manufactured for installation on F20•Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (medium)

Page 20: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContingency Plan(s)

• Remaining Scenarios / Option D.1

• Support from HAIC and HIWC teams• Preliminary F20 payload defined

• Open Points Funding for additional F/H

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 20

Contingency Plan(s)

Option D.1

Description: Worst scenario ; G-II not available ; IKP can’t be installed on F20 ; reconcilliation IKP/Robust after the field campaign

Assumption(s):•To correlate IKP and ROBUST probe after the 2014 Darwin F/T campaign: dedicated campaign or 2016 HAIC F/T campaign

•Additional F/H?

Impact(s): YES (very high)

Page 21: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingContent

• Context• HIWC – Key Facts & Status• Contingency Plan(s)

• Conclusion & Way Forward

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 21

Page 22: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingConclusion & Way Forward

• Conclusion Major changes wrt assumptions taken to build EASA-

HighIWC and HAIC project– Summer 2012: Darwin Field campaign, originally planned in Q1

2013, postponed to 2014 due to FTA QA issue– November 2012: NASA G-II not available in Q1 2014 due to

contract termination with FTA

2014 Field campaign is critical for HAIC project and can’t be further postponed. – Contingency plan: F20 to be the primary A/C in Q1 2014

The 2014 field campaign has to be secured

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 22

Page 23: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingConclusion & Way Forward

• Option C.1 is the prefered scenario

• Way Forward IKP feasibility study completed: NRC confirmed that IKP re-

design can meet F20 requirements Open points

– FAA funding to be secured• Action to provide a complete description of what the Falcon 20

would deliver in 2014 to both the new rulemaking Appendix D for ice crystals and how this flight campaign could address current fleet issues for mitigating the ice crystal threat

– Funding to be secured for addtional F/H

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 23

Page 24: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWC

EASA-HighIWC Final MeetingConclusion & Way Forward

• Actions to secure the Option C.1

December 2012EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 24

N° Owner Actions Status

1 NRC IKP re-design feasibility study COMPLETED

2 SAFIRE Schedule for IKP installation on F20 (certification, qualification and F/T)

COMPLETED

3 SAFIRE HWL RDR-4000 installation on F20 feasibility study (lower priority)

OPEN

4 SAFIRE ADS-B (Mandatory for Darwin) OPEN

5 All Review of HAIC/HIWC Objectives and impact of Option C.1

ON-GOING

6 All Validate location of the field campaign (Satellite rapid scan is key)

OPEN

7 All To secure funding for additional F/H OPEN

8 All To secure FAA funding & launch IKP re-design ASAP

OPEN

Page 25: EASA HighIWC EASA-HighIWC Final Meeting Contingency Plan & Way Forward EASA HighIWC (EASA.2011.OP.28) Presented by Airbus - CNRS (LATMOS/BOM – LaMP – SAFIRE)

Thi

s do

cum

ent

and

the

info

rmat

ion

cont

aine

d ar

e E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ pro

pert

y an

d sh

all n

ot

be copi

ed o

r di

sclo

sed

to a

ny t

hird

par

ty w

ithou

t E

AS

A H

ighI

WC

Con

trac

tors

’ prio

r w

ritte

n au

thor

izat

ion

EASA HighIWCDecember 2012

Ice Water Content of clouds at High altitude (EASA HighIWC, EASA.2011.OP.28)

This document and the information contained are EASA HighIWC Contractors’ property and shall not be

copied or disclosed to any third party without EASA HighIWC Contractors’ prior written authorization

Project funded by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)

EASA.2011.OP.28 Page 25