Click here to load reader
Feb 06, 2018
iii
Detailing Aspects of the Reinforcement in
Reinforced Concrete Structures
Retaining wall (case study)
By
Timothy Ovainete Saiki
in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Civil Engineering
at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday July 28, 2016 at 10:00 AM.
Supervisor: Prof. dr. ir. D.A. Hordijk Thesis committee: Dr. ir. drs. C.R. Braam, TU Delft
Dr. ir. P.C.J. Hoogenboom, TU Delft
An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/.
http://repository.tudelft.nl/
iv
v
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my gratitude to Prof.dr.ir. D.A. Hordijk for his invaluable contribution to this MSc
thesis. The guidance he provided and the quality he demanded at all times were vital to this achievement. I
would also like to express my gratitude to my direct supervisor, Dr.ir.drs. C.R. Braam for his patience, the
knowledge he shared and other contributions made during the course of this MSc thesis. I also like to
express deep gratitude to Dr. Ir. P.C.J. Hoogenboom for the guidance he provided and the support he
provided towards the realization of this thesis.
Finally I would like to then my wife (Vovo) and daughters (Ofushi & Enworo) for the unconditional support
they gave me over the past two year. I look forward to returning to you soon, never to leave again. Thank
you a million times!!!
Timothy O. Saiki
Delft, July 2016
vi
Summary This thesis studies the impact of reinforcement detailing on the behaviour of a reinforced concrete structure.
Using a retaining wall as a case-study, the performance of two commonly used alternative reinforcement
layouts (of which one is wrong) are studied and compared. Reinforcement Layout 1 had the main
reinforcement (from the wall) bent towards the heel in the base slab. For Reinforcement Layout 2, the
reinforcement was bent towards the toe. This study focused on the reinforcement details used in the D-
region, and on how it impacts the capacity, joint efficiency and failure mode of the structure.
First, a literature review is carried out which focused on the behaviour of corner joints from experimental
works available in literature. Next, a strut and tie model of the D-region is made. From the strut and tie
model, the opening moments acting on the structure subjects the re-entrant corner region to a concentration
of tensile stresses, while a compressive stress field acts concurrently with transverse tension within the core
of the joint. The internal forces within the D-region are evaluated, and the required steel areas computed.
Afterwards, ATENA FEM software is used to model the structure, and to study the impact of the alternative
reinforcement layouts on the capacity and behavior of the structure. Some aspects of the structural behavior
studied include the stress and strain distribution in the concrete, crack width, crack pattern, steel stress and
strain distribution etc.
The results obtained from the FEM analysis was sensitive to bond model defined in the material model.
When perfect-bond was assumed in the FEM analysis, Reinforcement Layout 1 attained a joint efficiency
of 72.4%, while Reinforcement Layout 2 achieved 88% joint efficiency. In his experimental works on
similar details, Nilsson (1973) had obtained a joint efficiency of 60% for Reinforcement Layout 1, a range
between 82% to 102% for Reinforcement Layout 2. The disparity between FEM result and experimental
result for Reinforcement Layout 1 occurred because perfect-bond was assumed in the FEM model. With
cracking playing prominent role in this structure, perfect bond assumption is not valid, and some slip is
inevitable. To verify, a bond-slip relation is used to model the structure, resulting in 62% joint efficiency
for Reinforcement Layout 1, and 82% joint efficiency for Reinforcement Layout 2. These values obtained
with bond-slip model are much closer to experimental values than those obtained with perfect bond.
The reinforcement layout used also had significant impact on the joint behavior. In Reinforcement Layout
1, the reinforcement (tie) from the wall was not properly anchored in the nodal region in the slab. The
compressive stress field (i.e. inclined strut) was observed to flow past the bent part of the reinforcement
without much interaction. The force transfer between the inclined strut and the tie was not effective. Also,
wide cracks occurred along the inclined strut from the action of transverse tension (caused by the opening
moment). These cracks which further weakened the strut. This detail had a diagonal tension cracking failure
mode. For Reinforcement Layout 2, a clearly defined nodal region exists. A CTT node formed allowed for
effective force transfer (at the node) between the concrete and steel. Furthermore, the bent part of the
reinforcement crossed the path of the inclined strut, and helped to control crack width. The reinforcement
also provided confinement to the inclined strut which further increased its strength. This detail prevented
diagonal tension cracking failure, hence the higher capacity it achieved. Failure was by crushing of concrete
along the joint slab interface, after formation of a wide vertical crack extending from the re-entrant corner
downwards into the slab. Adding a diagonal bar, placed 45 around the re-entrant corner, helped to control
this re-entrant corner crack, thus ensuring that over 100% joint efficiency is achieved. In conclusion,
Reinforcement Layout 1 is a poor detail. Though common in practice, the nodal is not properly formed in
this detail. This makes force transfer between concrete and steel sub-optimal. The detail should be avoided.
vii
viii
Contents
Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................ v
Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... vi
Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... viii
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Aim of the study ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Method of study ........................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Outline of the report ..................................................................................................................... 2
2 Detailing of structures and Strut and Tie Model................................................................................... 4
2.1 Extent and behaviour of D-regions ............................................................................................... 4
2.2 Strut and tie model ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Developing the strut and tie model .............................................................................................. 7
2.4 Dimensioning of strut and tie ....................................................................................................... 9
2.4.1 Struts ................................................................................................................................... 10
2.4.2 Ties ...................................................................................................................................... 12
2.4.3 Nodes .................................................................................................................................. 12
2.4.4 Dimensioning and design of struts, ties and nodes ............................................................ 15
2.5 Applications of strut and tie model ............................................................................................ 18
2.5.1 Corbels ................................................................................................................................ 18
2.5.2 Corner Joints ....................................................................................................................... 20
2.6 Detailing ...................................................................................................................................... 27
2.6.1 Some basic rules.................................................................................................................. 27
2.6.2 Bond and anchorage ........................................................................................................... 29
2.6.3 Splicing of bars .................................................................................................................... 31
3. Behaviour and detailing of corner joints .......