1 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON TARANG INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT KOKRAJHAR UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI PREPARED & SUBMITTED TO STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM BY BS CONSULTANTS 128, RAJGARH ROAD, 2 ND FLOOR GUWAHATI-781 007
76
Embed
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON TARANG …slnaiwmpassam.gov.in/xfiles/kokrajhar(III)-2009-10-tarang iwmp.pdf1 detailed project report on tarang integrated watershed management project kokrajhar
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
ON
TARANG INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT
KOKRAJHAR
UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF LAND RESOURCES
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
PREPARED & SUBMITTED
TO STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY
INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
BY
BS CONSULTANTS 128, RAJGARH ROAD, 2ND FLOOR
GUWAHATI-781 007
2
PROJECT AT A GLANCE 1. Name of Project : Tarang Integrated Watershed Management
Project Code No. 3A1E7/IIa (Kokrajhar -III).
2. Name of the State : Assam (Code No. 18)
3. Name of the State Level Nodal Agency
: Department of Soil Conservation, Government of Assam
4. Name of the District : Kokrajhar District
5. Name of the Development Block
: Titaguri Development Block
6. Name of Village Council Development Committee (VCDC)
10. Area proposed to be treated : 3000 ha (Approved Project area sanctioned for preparation of DPR vide letter no: SLNA/7/09-10/965-988 dated 15th December 2009)
13. Name & Address of PIA : Divisional Officer, Kokrajhar Soil Conservation Division, Kokrajhar.
3
CONTENTS
Sl. No.
Chapter Particulars Page No.
1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2-3 3 CHAPTER –I GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 4-10 Introduction 4 Climate & Soil 4 Physiography & Drainage 4 Demographic profile 5 Vegetation 5 Land use & Land Holdings 6 IWM projects in the District 7 Proposed IWMP in the District Table M(SP) 2 8 Prioritized list of Project Table DPR-1 8 Vision & Strategy 9 4 CHAPTER –II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TARANG IWM
PROJECT AREA 11-14
Location 11 Climate 11 Rainfall with Table: DPR -2 12 Seasonal distribution of Rainfall Table: DPR-3 13 Soil 14 Physiography, Relief & Drainage 14 5 CHAPTER-III PRESENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT AREA 15-27 Objectives 15-16 Present Land Use & Land Cover, Table: DPR 4 17 Details of Areas of Micro Watersheds Table: M (SP) 2 17 Details of Types of Areas Covered under IWMP, Table (SP)
3 18
Details of Physiography Relief of the Project Table: M (SP) 4 19 Agro-Climatic Zone, Soil types, Average Rainfall & Major
Crops., Table M (SP) 5 19
Details of Flood & Drought in Project Area., Table M (SP) 6 20 Details of Soil Erosion, Table M (SP) 7. 21 Details of Infrastructure, Table M (SP)8 22 Details of Land Holdings pattern, Table M (SP) 9 23 Details of Common Property Resources Table M (SP)10 24 Details of Kharif Crop Area, Table M(PO) C1 25 Details of Rabi Crops Area, Table M (PO) C2 25
4
Details of Zaid Crop Area, Table M (PO) C3 26 Details of Fund Flow of Watershed Committee Account,
Table M(FM) 4 26
Details of Pending UGs, Table M(FM) 5 27 6. CHAPTER-IV PROPOSED MANAGEMENT PLAN 28-53 Resource potentials, problems & constraints 28-31 Strategy 31-36 Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table M(PA) A1 37 Other Activities of Preparatory Phase Table M (PA)-A2 38 Phasing of Livelihood activities Table: DPR-5 39-40 Activities related to Surface water resources Table M (PA)B1 41 Activities related to ground water resources Table M (PA)B2 42 Activities proposed for users group in the project areaTable
No. M (PS)B3 Activities related to livelihood by Self Help Groups Table M(PA)B4
43
44-47 Other activities of watershed work phase Table M (PA)B5 48 Details of Engineering Structures in Watershed works Table
M(PA)B6 49
Details of activities connected with vegetative cover Table M(PA)B7
50
Details of other allied activities Table M(PA)B8 51 Livelihood proposed to be created for Asset less people
Table M(PA) B9 52
Livelihood proposed to be created for farmer Table M(PA)B10
53
7 CHAPTER-V PLANNING- 54-65 Proposed Entry Point Activities (EPA) Table DPR 6 54 Year wise phasing of project activities, Table DPR 7 55 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 8 56-58 Year wise Physical & Financial Target Table DPR 9 59-62 Village wise GPS Points Table DPR 10 63-65 8 CHAPTER-VI INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 66 Details of Self Help groups (SHG) M(IS)9 66 Details of User Groups (UGs) in project area Table
M(IS)10 66
9 CHAPTER-VII CAPACITY BUILDING 67 Capacity building activities for the year 2010-11, Table
M(CB)2 67
Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Table M(CB)3
67
10 MAPS Location Map of Tarang IWM Project. Present Land Use Map of Tarang Watershed Area.
5
Watershed map of Tarang IWM project showing Micro Watersheds, villages, drainage, relief etc.
Treatment map of Tarrang IWMP
6
INTRODUCTION
Soil-Water-Plant resources are nature’s gift to mankind. These three resources are the
most important and vital natural resources for the existence of man and animals. Soil,
water and plant are so interdependent that one cannot be managed efficiently without the
other two. But due to high rate of population growth-both human and livestock, there is
indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources for meeting the ever-increasing demand
for food, fodder, fuel, fibers and fertilizers. Thus developed, continuous degradation of
production base and imbalance in land-water-plant and human-animal system, leads to
ecological imbalance and economic insecurity. As a result there is threat to the quality of
our life and cultivation. Therefore it is highly felt that the natural resources are to be
managed efficiently, collectively and simultaneously one has to look and find out the
suitable under “unit of management”. Of the three resources soil, water and vegetation or
plants “soil and vegetation subjected themselves to and easier manipulation whereas
water is the climatic parameter that need to be disciplined once it comes in contact with
vegetation and the soil. However, water can be managed conveniently and efficiently
only if watershed is taken as an unit. Since soil, plant and water are interdependent
resources, “watershed” is considered to be the ideal unit for most effective and gainful
management of these resources.
Watershed is defined as a unit of an area, which covers all land and water area that
contribute runoff to a common point. It is a complete dynamic unit, which invariably
response to any change that may be brought about within its extent. The soil and water
must therefore be considered planned and managed on watershed basics for effective
results.
7
Watershed approach has conventionally aimed at treating degraded land with the help of
low cost and locally accessed technologies such as in-situ soil and moisture conservation
measures, afforestation etc. through a participatory approach that seek to secure close
involvement of the user communities. The broad objectives were the promotion of the
overall economic development and improvement of socio-economic conditions of the
resources poor section of the people in-habiting the programme areas. With this aim, the
Govt. of India has launched the “Integrated Watershed Management Programme
(IWMP).
METHODOLOGY
In general the common guidelines for watershed development projects (2008) of the
Department of Land Resources (DOLR) Government of India were followed in
preparation of the Detailed Project Report (DPR).
The methodology of planning, according to the guidelines, envisages participatory
planning involving directly the villagers (Beneficiaries) of the project area with active co-
operation & participation from the gram Panchyats VCDC. The Participatory Rural
Appraisal (PRA) was carried out in all the villages in the projects area. Participatory
work sheet for assessment of needs and priorities including details of activities were
prepared. The socio economic survey was conducted covering each and every house hold.
The data collected house wise and village wise were generated and analyzed.
The Comprehensive District Agricultural Plan was also referred to and the prescriptions
suggested in C-DAP were adhered to in finalizing the work phase.
Basic information on watershed including rainfall, temperature, topography,
hydrogeology, soil forests etc. were collected from various published and unpublished
records reports etc. of various Central and State Government Organization including
TABLE-M (SP) 2: DETAILS OF AREAS OF MICRO-WATERSHEDS COVERED UNDER THE WATERSHED PROGRAMME (HA) OF DOLR IN THE STATE (A) PRE-IWMP, (B) UNDER IWMP, (C ) UNDER OTHER MINISTRIES AND (D) TOTAL AREA (HA) COVERED UNDER THE WATERSHED PROGRAMME OF DOLR: STATE-WISE *
Cultivated and wasteland area of the project Area details (ha) (Falling within the projects)
Cultivated rain fed
area
Cultivated irrigated
area
Uncultivated wasteland Pvt. Agri. Land Forest
Land Community
land
Others (River & river sand
etc.)
Total area (ha) a) Temporary
Fallow b)
Permanent
5850 624 556 232 Gen. SC ST OBC Total 467 767 138 8506 1836 525 4408 493 7262
24
TABLE-M(SP)4: DETAILS OF PHYSIOGRAPHY AND RELIEF OF THE PROJECT AREAS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istri
ct
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Elev
atio
n (m
eter
s)
Slop
e ra
nge
(%)
Ord
er o
f w
ater
shed
Su
b/m
icro
-w
ater
shed
M
ajor
st
ream
s
Top sequence (Soil series)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
50-7
5 m
.
3 –
5 %
1.
Upp
er T
aran
g 2.
K
hurs
akat
i
Tara
ng
Deep, imperfectly drain, fine loamy soils occurring on level to nearly level plain having loamy surface with moderate flooding, (Fine Loamy Typic Haplaquents) asociated with deep moderately well drain, kind silty soils (Fine silty Aeric Fluvaquents)
TABLE-M (SP) 5: AGRO-CLIMATIC ZONE, SOIL TYPES, AVERAGE RAINFALL AND MAJOR CROPS IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sl. No.
Name of State
Name of the Agro-climatic
zone
Area in ha
Name of
the district
Name of the
project
Major soil types Average rainfall in mm
(preceding 5 years’ average)
Major crops
a) Type b) Area (ha)
a) Name b) Area (ha)
1. Assam
Lower Brahmaputra
Agro-Climatic Zone No.-4
8506 Kokrajhar Tarang
Fine Loamy Typic
Haplaquents 5100
3206.6
Paddy, 2780
Oil seed, 250
Fine Silty Aeric Fluvaquents 3406
Jute 150
25
TABLE-M (SP) 6: DETAILS OF FLOOD AND DROUGHT IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sl
. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istri
ct
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Particulars Villages
Periodicity Not
affected Annual Any other (please specify)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
ajha
r
Tara
ng
Flood
No. of villages: 15 Nos.
Occasional flash flood occurs during high rainfall in upper catchment in Bhutan, causing heavy loses to standing crops and slit/sand deposition takes place on cultivable land on river banks. As bank erosion and setting of river courses are common phenomenon in the project are and scarcity and uneven rainfall caused draught during monsoon season.
20 Nos.
Drought No. of
villages: 35 Nos.
Nil. In an interval of 10 to 12 years drought like situation occurs in the entire State when Monsoon starts late.
Nil.
26
TABLE-M (SP) 7: DETAILS OF SOIL EROSION IN THE PROJECT AREAS.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No.
Name of State
Name of District
Names of project Cause Type of
erosion
Area affected
(ha)
Run off (mm/ year)
Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year)
1. Assam Kokajhar Tarang Water erosion a. Sheet 3402 176.18 41.48 b. Rill 3063 117.88 c. Gully 2041 137.78 Sub-Total: 8506
Wind erosion - NA - Total for project 8506
(Source: Soil Conservation Deptt. Assam – Data as reflected in PPR)
27
TABLE-M (SP) 8: DETAILS OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Sl
. No.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istr
ict
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Parameters Status
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all-weather road
35
(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 35 (iii) No. of households without access to drinking water Nil
(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Center The project area is very much near the District HQ. So, medical facilities are available to the villagers.
(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary The project area is very much near the District HQ. So, Vety. facilities are available to the villagers.
(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 2 Sub Post offices (viii) No. of villages with access to Banks The project area is very much near the
District HQ. So, banking facilities are available to the villagers.
(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets / mandis 35 Nos. (x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries The project area is near the district HQ. (xi) Total quantity of surplus milk Nil (xii) No. of milk collection centers
Total for the Project: 320 192 - - 9600 2155 393 227 - - 22083 4222 688 287 - - 35454 8226
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops;
from column no.6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed
31
TABLE-M(PO)C3: DETAILS OF ZAID CROP AREA AND YIELD IN THE PROJECT AREA. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Pine apple - 13 - 350 - 4550 3 29 520 500 1560 14500 9 55 525 700 4725 38500
Total for the project: 200 143 22 530 4400 19650 228 211 545 706 7185 37902 274 269 552 942 11880 70778
* From column no. 2, total number of States, from column no. 3, total no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of projects; from column no.5, total no. of crops; from column no. 6 to 8, the totals for the area, average yield per ha and total production, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the Table. Irri. – Irrigated Rf. – Rainfed
TABLE-M(FM)4: DETAILS OF FUND FLOW OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE ACCOUNTS IN THE
TABLE-DPR: 5 PHASING OF LIVELIHOOD ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Name of District : Kokrajhar Name of Project : Tarang Treatable Area : 3000 ha. Financial Target 82.80 lakhs
(Rs. in Lakhs) Name of Scheme Physical
Target Unit cost
Year wise Phasing 2nd year (4%) 3rd year (3%) 4th year (3%) Total
Livelihood Activities (Asset less) Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Livestock Development Works by S.H.G. (1 unit to each SHG Group)
A. Piggery – Breaded 2 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 nil 0.00 2.40 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.12 1 nos 0.12 6 nos 0.72 5 nos 0.60 1.44 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 1.20 4 nos 4.80 3 nos 3.60 3 nos 3.60 12.00 Other Activities 0.00 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.40 4 nos 1.60 1 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 2.80 B. Handloom 8 nos 0.50 3 nos 1.50 2 nos 1.00 3 nos 1.50 4.00 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.44 nil 1 nos 0.44 1 nos 0.44 0.88 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2.00 E. Carpenter 5 nos 0.24 2 nos 0.48 2 nos 0.48 1 no. 0.24 1.20 F. Mobile Repairing 1 no. 0.30 1 nos 0.30 nil 0.00 0.00 0.30 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.00 I. Vermi Compost 3 nos 0.225 2 nos 0.45 1 nos 0.225 nil 0.00 0.68 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 5 nos 0.60 1 no 0.60 0.00 0.00 4 nos 2.40 3.00 K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.55 1 no 0.55 1 nos 0.55 1.10 L. Wood Craft 1 nos 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos 0.80 0.80 N. Jaru Making 1 nos 0.30 1 nos 0.30 0.30 O. Tarja Making 3 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.50 P. Bee-Keeping 3 nos 0.20 1 no 0.20 1 nos 0.20 1 nos 0.20 0.60
Year wise Phasing 2nd year (5%) 3rd year (4%) 4th year (4%) Total
Livelihood Activities (Asset less) Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Nos Amonut Production System & Micro Enterprises A. Piggery – Breaded 3 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 1 nos 1.20 3.60 B. Duck Rearing 8 nos 0.12 2 nos. 0.24 3 nos 0.36 3 nos 0.36 0.96 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 1.20 5 nos 6.00 3 nos 3.60 2 nos 2.40 12.00 D. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.40 3 nos 1.20 1 nos 0.40 3 nos 1.20 2.80 E. Handloom 14 nos 0.50 6 nos 3.00 4 nos 2.00 4 nos 2.00 7.00 F.Pottary Making 3 nos 0.44 2 nos 0.88 1 nos 0.44 1.32 G. Fruit Processing 8 nos 0.50 4 nos 2.00 2 nos 1.00 2 nos 1.00 4.00 H. Carpenter 8 nos 0.24 3 nos 0.72 3 nos 0.72 2 nos 0.48 1.92 I. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.30 2 nos 0.60 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.60 J. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 1.00 K. Vermi Compost 4 nos 0.225 0.00 0.00 1 nos 0.225 3 nos 0.675 0.90 L. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 7 nos 0.60 2 nos 1.20 2 nos 1.20 3 nos 1.80 4.20 O. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.55 1 no 0.55 nil 0.00 1 nos 0.55 1.10 P. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.55 nil 0.00 2 nos 1.10 1.10 R. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.40 2 nos. 0.80 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.80 S. Jaru Making 0 0.30 nil 0.00 nil 0.00 0.00 T. Tarja Making 5 nos 0.50 1 nos 0.50 2 nos 1.00 2 nos 1.00 2.50 U. Bee-Keeping 5 nos 0.20 4 nos 0.80 1 nos 0.20 1.00
Total: 92 Nos. 18.01 14.39 14.41 46.80
46
IV. B. WATERSHED WORKS PHASE
TABLE-M(PA)B1: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SURFACE WATER RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREAS. ( Rs. in lakh )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S. N
o.
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
Nam
es o
f MW
S.
Type of structures
Pre-project Proposed target
No. Area Bene-
fitted (ha)
Storage capacity
Augmentation/ repair of existing structures Construction of new structures Total target
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts, from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column nos. 6 to 10 grand totals, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table. @ Information on private & public/ community assets may be shown separately.
47
(Contd.)
TABLE- M(PA)B2: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO RECHARGING GROUND WATER RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. No.
Nam
e of
Sta
te
Nam
e of
Dis
tric
t
Nam
e of
pro
ject
Typ
e of
stru
ctur
e Pre-project Proposed target Achievement due to project
Change in
irrigated
area (Col. 8-6) (ha)
No.
Area
Irrigated
(ha)
Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging
structures
Construction of new recharging structures
Total target Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging
structures
Construction of new recharging structures Total achieve-ment
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost No.
Area irrigated
(ha)
Exp. incurred No.
Area irri-
gated (ha)
Exp. incurre
d
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Exp. To be
incurred
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Tube wells 9 - - - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA
- - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA For drinkin
g purpose
(iii)Any others (Pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total for the project: 9 - - - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA
- - - 30 For drinking purpose
From EPA
For drinking purpose
From EPA For drinkin
g purpose
* From column no.2 total number of States, from column no.3 total no. of Districts; from column no.4 total no. of projects; from column nos. 6 to 9 grand totals, category-wise, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table. @ Information on private & public/ community assets may be shown separately
48
TABLE M(PS)B3: ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR USERS GROUPS (UGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA. (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sl. N
o.
Nam
e of
St
ate
Nam
e of
D
istr
ict
Nam
e of
pr
ojec
t
Nam
e of
M
WS
Major Activities of the UGs-targets Nos. of UGs
proposed
Estimated Cost
Amount of WDF to be collected
Structure /Activity proposed Type No. Treatment
(ha.)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Upp
er T
aran
g M
WS
Excavated pond 5/41333 m3 681 5 23.56 1.18 RCC Check dam 1/20 m2 200 1 7.10 0.36 Irrigation Channel (Brick) 3/2198 Rm 310.72 3 10.33 0.52 E/Embankment 5/6000 Rm 340 5 12.00 0.60 Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm 5/1491 Rm 140 5 30.18 1.51 Field bund in Rm. 1/2500 Rm 10 1 3.00 0.15 Protective afforestation in ha. 7/24.32 ha. 24.32 7 6.64 0.33 Horticulture demonstration in ha. 1/0.50 0.50 1 0.24 0.01 Road side plantation -/2 - 2 1.5 0.08 Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 6/6 ha. 6 6 0.7 0.04 Ring wells in No. -/2 - 2 0.9 0.05
Sub Total: 1712.54 38 96.15 4.81
Khu
rsak
ati M
WS
Excavated pond 7/64660 m3 685 7 36.85 1.84 RCC Check dam - - - - 0.00 Irrigation Channel (Brick) 3/5162 Rm 349.62 3 24.26 1.21 E/Embankment 1/4115 Rm 200 1 8.23 0.41 Water dist. Canal in Rm. - - - - - Boulder revetment in Rm 2/217 Rm 18 2 4.40 0.22 Field bund in Rm. - - - - - Protective afforestation in ha. 10/26.84 26.84 10 7.62 0.38 Horticulture demonstration in ha. 0 0 0 0 0.00 Road side plantation -/1 - 1 1 0.05 Crop demo (paddy) in ha. 6/6 ha 6 6 0.35 0.02 Crop demo (veg) in ha. 1/1 ha. 1 1 0.9 0.05 Ring wells in No. 1/1 no. - 1 0.24 0.01
Sub Total: 1287.46 25 83.85 4.19 Grand Total: 3000 63 180.00 9.00
49
TABLE- M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUP (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5
S. No. Name of the State
Name of the District
Name of project
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs
involved
Average annual income
from activity per SHG
1 Assam Kokrajhar Tarang
A. Piggery – Breaded 2 nos 0.50 B. Duck Rearing 12 nos 0.50 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.50 B. Handloom 8 nos 0.50 C.Pottary Making 2 nos 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 4 nos 0.50 E. Carpenter 5 nos 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 1 no. 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 3 nos 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2 5 nos 0.50 K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.50 L. Wood Craft 1 nos 0.50 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.50 N. Jaru Making 1 nos 0.50 O. Tarja Making 3 nos 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 3 nos 0.50
Total: 73Nos.
* From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, and from column no. 5 to 12, category-wise totals SHG for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.
50
TABLE-M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA..
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
No. of SHGs given training
Total assistance received by the SHG (Amount in Rs.) Total annual
Income generated (Rs.)
Total Annual
Savings (Rs.)
No. of SHGs Graded as
Total Amount of loan
sanctioned by the bank (s)
No. of SHGs federated
Loan from revolving fund Training Material Others
(pl.specify) I II III
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.50 0.30 Not graded Not yet processed
2 nos
12 nos 1.20 1.00 0.72 - 4.72 1.80 -do- -do- 12 nos
10 nos 1.00 1.00 15.00 - 19.00 2.00 -do- -do- 10 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 3.50 - 6.30 1.40 -do- -do- 7 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.40 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
4 nos 0.40 0.40 2.00 - 3.60 0.80 -do- -do- 4 nos
5 nos 0.50 0.50 2.50 - 4.50 1.00 -do- -do- 5 nos
1 no. 0.10 0.10 0.40 - 0.80 0.20 -do- -do- 1 no.
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.80 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.90 - 2.10 0.60 -do- -do- 3 nos
5 nos 0.50 0.50 7.50 - 10.50 2.00 -do- -do- 5 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.60 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
1 nos 0.10 0.10 0.50 - 0.90 0.20 -do- -do- 1 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
1 nos 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 0.60 0.20 -do- -do- 1 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.60 - 1.50 0.30 -do- -do- 3 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.60 - 1.50
0.30 -do- -do- 3 nos
73Nos. 7.30 7.10 42.02 - 71.12 14.70 73Nos.
51
TABLE- M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO PRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO ENTERPRISES IN THE PROJECT AREA (Rs. in lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5
S. No. Name of the State
Name of the District
Name of project
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved
Average annual income
from activity per SHG
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
A. Piggery – Breaded 3 nos 0.50 B. Duck Rearing 8 nos 0.50 C. Milch Cow 10 nos 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing 7 nos 0.50 B. Handloom 14 nos 0.50 C.Pottary Making 3 nos 0.50 D. Fruit Processing 8 nos 0.50 E. Carpenter 8 nos 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing 2 nos 0.50 G. Bike Repairing 2 nos 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 4 nos 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
7 nos 0.50
K. Bamboo Craft 2 nos 0.50 L. Wood Craft 2 nos 0.50 M. Blacksmith 2 nos 0.50 N. Jaru Making 0 0 O. Tarja Making 5 nos 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 5 nos 0.50
Total: 92 Nos.
* From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, and from column no. 5 to 12, category-wise totals SHG for the entire country may be mentioned at the end of the table.
52
TABLE-M(PA)B4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO LIVELIHOODS BY SELF HELP GROUPS (SHGS) IN THE PROJECT AREA.
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 No. of SHGs
given training Total assistance received by the SHG
(Amount in Rs.) Total annual
Income generated (Rs.)
Total Annual
Savings (Rs.)
No. of SHGs Graded as
Total Amount of loan
sanctioned by the bank (s)
No. of SHGs federated
Loan from revolving fund
Training Material Others (pl.specify)
I II III
3 nos 0.30 0.30 1.20 - 2.25 0.45 Not graded Not yet processed 3 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 0.84 - 4.04 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
10 nos 1.00 1.00 20.00 - 24.00 2.00 -do- -do- 10 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 3.50 - 6.30 1.40 -do- -do- 7 nos
14 nos 1.40 1.40 7.00 - 12.60 2.80 -do- -do- 14 nos
3 nos 0.30 0.30 0.90 - 2.10 0.60 -do- -do- 3 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
8 nos 0.80 0.80 4.00 - 7.20 1.60 -do- -do- 8 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.80 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
4 nos 0.40 0.40 1.20 - 2.80 0.80 -do- -do- 4 nos
7 nos 0.70 0.70 10.5 - 14.70 2.80 -do- -do- 7 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.60 - 1.60 0.60 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 1.00 - 1.80 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
2 nos 0.20 0.20 0.80 - 1.60 0.40 -do- -do- 2 nos
0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0
5 nos 0.50 0.50 1.00 - 2.50 0.50 -do- -do- 5 nos
5 nos 0.0.50 0.0.50 1.00 - 1.50 0.50 -do- -do- 5 nos
92 Nos. 8.70 8.70 59.14 95.59 19.05 92 Nos.
53
TABLE-M(PA)B5: OTHER ACTIVITIES OF WATERSHED WORKS PHASE* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5 to 14 categorywise totals, from column no. 15, total cost incurred, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table #One of the following may be entered in column (a) of 5 to 14
(i) Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started (v) not relevant (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)
54
TABLE-M(PA)B6: DETAILS OF ENGINEERING STRUCTURES IN WATERSHED WORKS
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
MW
S
Name of Structures
Type of treatment Type of land Executing
agency (i) UG
(ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)
Target
(i) R
idge
are
a (R
)
(ii) D
rain
age
line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d de
v. (L
)
(i) P
riva
te
(ii) C
omm
unity
(iii)
Oth
ers (
pl. s
peci
fy)
No. of units (No./ cu.m./
Rmt)
Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected
month & year of completion (mm/yyyy)
M W O T
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar U
pper
Tar
ang
Excavated pond Y Y UG 5/41333 m3 4.71 18.85 0 23.56 1ST,2ND, & 3RD year
RCC Check dam Y Y UG 1/20 m2 4.26 2.48 0.36 7.1 2nd year
Irrigation Channel (Brick) Y Y UG 3/2198 Rm 4.65 5.16 0.52 10.33 1st & 2nd year
E/Embankment Y Y UG 5/6000 Rm 2.4 9.6 0 12 1st ,2nd 3rd & 4th year
Boulder revetment in Rm Y Y UG 5/1491 Rm 21.13 7.54 1.51 30.18 2nd 3rd & 4th year
Field bund in Rm. Y Y UG 1/2500 Rm 0.6 2.4 3 4th year
Sub total: 37.75 46.03 2.39 86.17
Khu
rsak
ati M
WS
Excavated pond Y Y UG 7/64660 m3 7.37 29.48 0 36.85 1st ,2nd 3rd & 4th year Irrigation Channel (Brick)
Y Y UG 3/5162 Rm 10.92 12.13
1.21 24.26
1st, 2nd 3rd & 4th year E/Embankment Y Y UG 1/4115 Rm 1.65 6.58 0 8.23 4th year Boulder revetment in Rm
Y Y
UG 2/217 Rm 3.08 1.1
0.22 4.4 2nd & 3rd year Sub total: 23.02 49.29 1.43 73.74
Grand total: 60.77 95.32 3.82 159.91
55
TABLE-M(PA)B7: DETAILS OF ACTIVITIES CONNECTED WITH VEGETATIVE COVER IN WATERSHED WORKS* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect Name of
structure/ work
Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target
(i) Ridge area (R)
(ii) Drainage
line (D)
(iii) Land dev. (L)
(i) Private
(ii) Community
(iii) Others (pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
Area (ha) No. of plants
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year of
completion (mm/ yyyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
Protective afforestation in ha.
Y - - - Comm. - UG 24.32 24320 6.64 1st & 4th year
Horticulture demonstration in ha.
Y - - Pvt. - - UG 0.5 500 0.24 3rd year
Road side plantation - - - - - Road side UG 2500 No. 2500 No. 1.50 4th year Ring wells in No. - - - - Comm. Drinking
purpose UG 2 - 0.70 4th year
Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. - - Y - - Demonstration UG 6 - 0.90 2nd year
Sub Total: 30.82 ha. 9.98
Khu
rsak
ati
Protective afforestation in ha.
Y - - - Comm. - UG 26.84 ha 26840 7.62
1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th year
Road side plantation - - - - - Road side UG 1000 Nos. 1000 1.00 3rd year Ring wells in No. -- - - - Comm. Drinking
purpose UG 1 No. - 0.35 4th year
Crop demo. (paddy) in ha. - - Y - - Demonstration UG 6 ha. - 0.90 2nd year Crop demo. (veg.) in ha - - Y - - -do- UG 1 ha. - 0.24 2nd year
Sub Total - - - - - - - - 3484 ha - 10.11 Grand Total - - - - - - - - 65.66 ha - 20.09
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 6, treatment-wise totals, from column no. 7, category-wise totals, from coulmn no. 8, agencywise totals, from column no. 9, total area, total no. of plants, total estimated cost, from column no. 10, total area, total no. of plants, total expenditure incurred, structure-wise no. of completed works, from column no. 11, itemwise totals, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table # in case two or more activities are executed over same area, the figures in area treated should be accounted only once and should reflect only the actual watershed area treated.
56
TABLE-M(PA)B8: DETAILS OF ALLIED / OTHER ACTIVITIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect
Name of activity@
Type of land Executing agency Target
(i) Private
(ii) Community
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG
(iii) Others (pl. specify)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected month & year of completion
(mm/yyyy)
1
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tar
ang
No schemes/activities have proposed under these activities.
* from column no. 2, no. of States; from column no. 3, no. of Districts; from column no. 4, total no. of Projects; from column no. 5, activity-wise totals, from column no. 6, type-wise totals, from coulmn no. 7, agency-wise totals, from column no. 8, total estimated cost, from column no. 9, total expenditure incurred, structure-wise no. of completed works, from column no. 10, item-wise totals, for the entire country may be indicated at the end of the table @The activities given in this column are merely indicative and States are free to choose any other activity suited to the project area.
57
TABLE-M(PA)B9: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR ASSET LESS PEOPLE
S. N
o.
Stat
e
Dis
tric
t
Proj
ect
Mic
ro W
S Name of activity No. of HH by social group Pre-Project Income (Avg./
HH) in Rs.
Cost per Unit
(In Rs.)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected income
per unit (BC
Ratio)
1.
Ass
am
Kok
rajh
ar
Tara
ng
Tara
ng &
Khu
rsak
ati M
WSs
SC ST Others Total SC ST Others A. Piggery – Breaded
10 10 10 30 - - - 1.20 3.60
0.50
B. Duck Rearing 20 40 20 80 - - - 0.12 0.96 0.50 C. Milch Cow 30 30 40 100 - - - 1.20 12.00 0.50 A. Bicycle Repairing
30 30 10 70 - - - 0.40 2.80
0.50
B. Handloom 40 40 60 140 - - - 0.50 7.00 0.50 C.Pottary Making 10 10 10 30 - - - 0.44 1.32 0.50 D. Fruit Processing
20 20 40 8 0 - - - 0.50 4.00
0.50
E. Carpenter 20 20 40 80 - - - 0.24 1.92 0.50 F. Mobile Repairing
0 10 10 2 0 - - - 0.30 0.60
0.50
G. Bike Repairing 10 10 0 2 0 - - - 0.50 1.00 0.50 I. Vermi Compost 10 20 10 4 0 - - - 0.225 0.90 0.50 J. Fishery Dev./ Fish Farming (25 x 30) m2
20 20 30 7 0 - - - 0.60
4.20
0.50
K. Bamboo Craft 0 10 10 20 - - - 0.55 1.10 0.50 L. Wood Craft 0 10 10 2 0 - - - 0.55 1.10 0.50 M. Blacksmith 10 0 10 2 0 - - - 0.40 0.80 0.50 N. Jaru Making 0 0 0 00 - - - 0.30 0.00 0.50 O. Tarja Making 10 20 20 5 0 - - - 0.50 2.50 0.50 P. Bee-Keeping 20 10 20 5 0 - - - 0.20 1.00 0.50
Total: 260 310 350 920 46.80
58
TABLE-M(PA)B10: LIVELIHOOD PROPOSED TO BE CREATED FOR FARMERS
TABLE-DPR: 8 YEARWISE PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL TARGET UNDER WATERSHED WORK PHASE Name of district:- Kokrajhar; Name of watershed:- Tarang Name of MWS:- Upper Tarang & Khursakati Total project area:- 6850 ha. Treatable area:- 3000 ha. Project cost:- 360.00 Lakhs.
(Rs. in Lakhs) Sl
No. Name of village Name of Schemes Physical
target Unit cost Year wise financial target
1st year
2nd year
3rd year
4th year
5th year Total
10% 13.7% 13.7% 12.6% (Consolidat-
ion) 5%
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UPPER TARANG MWS
1 Toronguri Protective afforestation 12 ha 27300 3.28 3.28
Boulder Revetment along the River Tarrang
742 rm 2024 15.00 0 15.00
Excavated farm pond 10000 m3 57 5.70 0 5.70
Earthen Embankment in Rm 1500 rm 200 3.00 0 3.00
Const. of irrigation canal (Brick) 1000m 470 4.70 0 4.70
Total 1040 610 1650 640 408 1048 575 380 975 (M – Male, F – Female) * From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from column 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, may be given for the entire country at the end of the table. TABLE-M(IS)10: DETAILS OF UGS IN THE PROJECT AREA.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S. No.
Names of State
Names of District
Names of
Project
Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
Total 599 321 920 627 271 897 365 (M – Male, F – Female) * From Column no. 2, 3 and 4, total no. of States, Districts and projects, respectively, from columns 5 to 8, category-wise grand totals, for the entire country may be given at the end of the table.
72
CHAPTER VIII - CAPACITY BUILDING
TABLE-M(CB)2: CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Sl. No. State Project
Stakeholders Total no. of
persons No. of persons trained so far
No. of persons to be trained during current financial
year
No. of persons trained during
current financial year
Sources of funding for training
Funds utilized
a) DoLR b)Any other (pl. specify) a) DoLR b)Any other
Total: 2324 590 * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4 to 7, Stakeholder-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country TABLE-M(CB)3: INFORMATION, EDUCATION & COMMUNICATION (IEC) ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR 2010-11.
81,000 * From Column no. 2, total no. of States implementing the programme, from Column no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 & 6, totals may be given at the end of the table for the entire country