Click here to load reader
May 20, 2020
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 1
www.mireandassociates.com
Delaware Basin Activity &
Performance Review
August 2017
EOG Resources 2016 Q4 Investor Presentation
Delaware Basin
Introduction & Findings
Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 2Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017
• The Delaware Basin is one of the most active drilling areas of the U.S., located in the
Permian Basin of Texas & New Mexico.
• The most frequently drilled reservoirs are the Bone Spring sand formation along with
the deeper Wolfcamp shale formation
• Mire & Associates, Inc. has reviewed data for over six thousand horizontal wells that
began producing from 2010 – 2016 along with published operator results.
• Our focus was to analyze the well performance trends from 2010-2016, operator activity
in 2016, and drilling economics at current oil & gas prices ($47 / BBL and $3 / MCF)
• Delaware Basin activity reflects economics; good for Bone Spring, very good for Wolfcamp
• IP30 rates and EURs have increased, linked to longer laterals & more proppant.
• Wolfcamp proppant loading could be yielding diminishing returns with regard to EUR
• To justify the recently reported lease acquisition prices of up to $60,000 per
acre, multiple, stacked benches (reservoirs) must be included & exploited.
U.S. Play Summary 2014, 2015, 2016
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 3
Wolfcamp Shale is the only horizontal play that had an increase in drilling for 2016.
Delaware Basin Overview
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 4
Production in the Delaware Basin doubled in 2 years, from 500,000 BOEPD in mid 2014 to 1,000,000 BOEPD in mid 2016.
Production in the Delaware Basin doubled in 2 years, from 500,000 BOEPD in mid 2014 to 1,000,000 BOEPD in mid 2016.
Only Wolfcamp & Bone Spring wells included
Texas NM
Activity trends 2010-2016
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Production Starts 2010 - 2016
Wolfcamp
Bone Spring
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Well Type 2010 - 2016
Horizontal
Directional
Vertical
Completion Trends
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
M ill
io n
lb s.
Total Proppant 2010 - 2016
Average per well
BONE SPRING
WOLFCAMP
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fe et
Lateral Length 2010 - 2016
Average per well
BONE SPRING
WOLFCAMP
IP30 Rate and Reserves
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 7
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
BOE per Day MBOE (6)
Wolfcamp 2010 – 2016 IP30 & EUR
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
BOE per Day MBOE (6)
Per well rate & reserves are increasing, linked to increases in lateral length and proppant
Bone Spring 2010 – 2016 IP30 & EUR
Well Performance Trends 2010 - 2016
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 8
BOPD MCFD GOR BOEPD MBO MMCF GOR MBOE avg lat len avg # prop/lat ft
2010 120 310 1,209 3,900 512 137 1,344 9,810 361 4,427 474
2011 256 385 855 2,221 528 168 991 5,899 333 4,653 513
2012 423 480 941 1,960 637 223 1,254 5,623 432 4,762 579
2013 638 525 1,082 2,061 705 244 1,250 5,123 452 4,970 578
2014 678 600 1,056 1,760 776 306 1,517 4,958 559 5,227 870
2015 593 605 1,048 1,732 780 399 1,809 4,534 701 5,392 1,222 2016 301 761 1,439 1,891 1,001 457 2,028 4,438 795 5,740 1,452
BOPD MCFD GOR BOEPD MBO MMCF GOR MBOE avg lat len avg # prop/lat ft
2010 83 475 994 2,093 641 253 857 3,387 396 4,307 334
2011 136 390 1,300 3,333 607 308 1,076 3,494 487 4,575 456
2012 181 436 1,237 2,837 642 318 1,285 4,041 532 4,709 474
2013 222 429 1,137 2,650 619 355 1,490 4,197 603 5,065 676
2014 405 468 1,738 3,714 758 467 2,532 5,422 889 5,484 1,058
2015 516 506 1,807 3,571 807 531 2,898 5,458 1,014 5,857 1,328
2016 542 695 2,180 3,137 1,058 690 2,557 3,706 1,116 6,523 1,707
Bone Spring Annual Well Performance
Wolfcamp Annual Well Performance
Year Wells Initial Production (IP30) Reserves per well (EUR) Well Design & Completion
Year Wells Initial Production (IP30) Reserves per well (EUR) Well Design & Completion
Typical Wolfcamp well EUR > 1 million BOE
Well Performance Trends 2010- 2016
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 9
Numbers in parentheses represent number of wells in the statistical sample
Initial production rates increased significantly in 2016, primarily linked to
increases in proppant loading
Initial Production Trends 2010- 2016 (Normalized)
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 10
Numbers in parentheses represent number of wells in the statistical sample
Proppant loading primarily drives increase
in IP30 rates for 2016
EUR vs. Proppant Trends (Normalized)
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 11
Diminishing returns for EUR in Wolfcamp?
Bone Spring EUR trend appears to have room for continued growth.
2016 Well Performance by County
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 12
Culberson County, TX & Lea County, NM stood out in 2016
BOPD MCFD GOR BOEPD MBO MMCF GOR MBOE avg lat len avg # prop/lat ft
Culberson 16 800 3,200 4,000 1,333 415 4,074 9,817 1,094 5,485 998
Eddy 90 725 1,475 2,034 971 512 2,084 4,070 859 5,735 1,324
Lea 126 845 1,400 1,657 1,078 485 2,356 4,858 878 5,695 1,607
Loving 28 600 1,400 2,333 833 435 1,816 4,175 738 5,480 1,544
Reeves 21 775 1,350 1,742 1,000 603 1,261 2,091 813 7,122 1,744
Ward 15 200 530 2,650 288 180 301 1,672 230 4,845 676
BOPD MCFD GOR BOEPD MBO MMCF GOR MBOE avg lat len avg # prop/lat ft
Culberson 41 525 3,900 7,429 1,175 1,027 7,232 7,042 2,232 6,772 1,959
Eddy 47 725 3,300 4,552 1,275 689 4,712 6,839 1,474 5,779 1,880
Lea 41 1,450 2,600 1,793 1,883 760 1,880 2,474 1,073 5,092 2,211
Loving 180 550 760 1,382 677 759 2,142 2,822 1,116 6,072 1,549
Pecos 31 635 750 1,181 760 529 829 1,567 667 7,855 1,995
Reeves 161 625 2,075 3,320 971 909 3,917 4,309 1,562 7,216 1,645
Ward 28 645 1,125 1,744 833 516 1,236 2,395 722 7,118 1,795
Winkler 13 725 800 1,103 858 1,105 1,373 1,243 1,334 6,390 1,623
County Wells Initial Production Rates (IP30)
County Wells Initial Production Rates (IP30)
Well Design & Completion
Well Design & Completion
2016 - Bone Spring Well Performance by County
2016 - Wolfcamp Well Performance by County
Reserves per well (EUR)
Reserves per well (EUR)
2016 Well Performance by County
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 13
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200
IP 3
0 (B
O E
P D
)
EUR (MBOE per well)
2016 Bone Spring Performance by County
Reeves
Eddy
Loving
Ward
Lea
Culberson
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,200 2,400 IP
3 0
(B O
EP D
)
EUR (MBOE per well)
2016 Wolfcamp Performance by County
Lea
Culberson
Eddy
Reeves
Loving
Ward
Pecos Winkler
2016 Operator Performance
Copyright Mire & Associates, Inc. 2017 Delaware Basin Performance & Activity Review 14
BOPD MCFD GOR BOEPD MBO MMCF GOR MBOE avg lat len avg # prop/lat ft
Anadarko 16 750 1,500 2,000 1,000 509 944 1,855 666 4,565 536
BTA 7 1,050 2,043 1,946 1,391 522 1,963 3,761 849 4,809 1,988
Chevron 29 731 1,800 2,462 1,031 388 2,072 5,340 733 5,509 1,106
Cimarex 1