CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/25032015U5VFK490CP&EMP.pdf · CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION:

Project : “SRM University”- Phase II Conceptual Plan &

Environmental Management Plan Developer : SRM Institute of Science & Technology

CONCEPTUAL PLAN &

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

INTRODUCTION:

SRM Institute of Science & Technology proposes to develop Phase II of SRM University situated

in the Rajiv Gandhi Education City, at Sonepat, Haryana –an integrated education hub in the

Sonepat Kundli region. The park is the location of more than 30 universities, medical colleges,

engineering colleges, and other educational institutes. SRM University, Haryana has been

established under Haryana Private University Act of 2006 as amended by Act 8 of 2013.

The total plot area of the project is 191794.24 sq. m. (19.18 hectare) and the total built up area

envisaged is 57,602.76 sq. m. (Phase I: 9314.87 sq. m. + Phase II: 48,287.89 sq. m.). Phase II will

involve construction Technical Block (Engineering, Management & Law), Hostel Block

(accommodation for 500 students), and 2 BHK Block with 44 units in addition to existing four Pre

Engineering Blocks.

BACKGROUND OF THE PROMOTERS:

The SRM Group has been in the field of education since 1969 and is running twenty prestigious

institutions in the field of Medical Sciences, Engineering, Management, Arts and Science. The

SRM Educational Group as a community have over 20,000 students and 1,500 staff spreading over

five campus in India. The SRM Group has earned the best teaching quality rating and a strong

research record and offers a wide range of undergraduate, postgraduate and doctoral programs in

Engineering, Management, Medicine and Health sciences, and Humanities.

LOCATION OF THE PROJECT:

The project is situated at Plot no. 39, Rajeev Gandhi Education City, Sonepat, Haryana.

Geographical coordinates of the project are 28° 55’ 15.67" N and 77° 07' 55.97" E.

Project : “SRM University”- Phase II

Developer : SRM Institute of Science & Technology

PROJECT SUMMARY:

Items

Project address Plot no. 39, Rajiv Gandhi Education City, Sonepat, Haryana.

Type of project Educational Institute (Building & Construction).

Screening category 'B-2' under item 8(a) of Schedule

amendments

Plot area 1,91,794.24 sq. m.

Built up area 57,602.76

(Phase I: 9,314.87 sq. m.; Phase II:

Ground coverage Permissible

Proposed

Green Area Total Green area

Phase II

Environmental Management Plan : SRM Institute of Science & Technology

Details

Plot no. 39, Rajiv Gandhi Education City, Sonepat, Haryana.

Educational Institute (Building & Construction).

2' under item 8(a) of Schedule – EIA Notification, 2006 and subsequent

amendments thereof.

794.24 sq. m.

57,602.76 sq. m.

(Phase I: 9,314.87 sq. m.; Phase II: 48,287.89 sq. m.)

Permissible : 48748.56 sq. m. (33% up to 10,000 sq. m., 25% above 10,000 sq. m.)

: 7.57% (14,512.83 sq. m.)

(Phase I: 9314.87 + Phase II: 5197.96 sq. m.)

Total Green area : 58,138.96 sq. m. (30.31%)

Conceptual Plan &

Environmental Management Plan

Plot no. 39, Rajiv Gandhi Education City, Sonepat, Haryana.

EIA Notification, 2006 and subsequent

(33% up to 10,000 sq. m., 25% above 10,000 sq. m.)

sq. m.)



Area under tree plantation : 38959.25 sq. m. (20.31%)

Area under water bodies : 9589.71 sq. m. (5%)

Area under herbs, shrubs, turfs : 9590 sq. m. (5%)

Maximum height 59.91 m (upto machine room/ mumty level)

55.02 m (upto terrace level)

No. of Floors

Phase I

Pre-Engineering Blocks: Ground Floor

Phase II

Engineering Block: B+G+5

Hostel Block: B+G+14

2 BHK Block: B+G+10

Parking facilities Required Parking : 756 ECU (Phase I: 150 + Phase II: 606)

Proposed Parking : 939 ECU (Phase I: 150 + Phase II: 789)

Power requirement

& source

Connected load : 4696 KW (Phase I: 831 KW + Phase II: 540 KW)

Maximum demand : 2619 KW (Phase I: 3865 KW + Phase II: 2079 KW)

Source : UHBVN

Power backup DG sets of cumulative capacity 875 kVA (625 kVA: 1 no. + 250 kVA: 1 no.)

Water requirement

& source

Total Water requirement: 468 KLD

Fresh Water: 261 KLD

Recycled Water: 207 KLD

Source: HUDA water supply

Sewage treatment &

disposal

Sewage treatment facility: STP of 250 KLD capacity

PROJECT DETAILS:

The proposed expansion (Phase II) will involve construction of Technical Block (Engineering,

Management & Law), Hostel Block (accommodation for 500 students), and 2 BHK Block with 44

units in addition to existing four Pre Engineering Blocks (Phase I). Details of the same are given as

under:



S. No. Block Name Capacity

Phase I

1. Pre Engineering Blocks 2,000 students

Phase II

1. Technical Block (Engineering, Management & Law) 2,000 students

2. Hostel Block 500 students

3. 2 BHK Block 44 units (220 persons)

BUILT UP AREA DETAILS:

S. No. Block FAR Area (sq. m.) Built up Area (sq. m.)

Phase I (existing)

1. Pre-Engineering Blocks 9,314.87 9,314.87

Phase II (Proposed)

1. Technical Block (Engineering Block) 16,502.22 20,697.65

2. Hostel Block 16,343.99 18,678.75

3. 2 BHK Block 7846.19 8,911.49

Total 40,692.40 48,287.89

Grand Total 50,007.27 57,602.76

S. No. Block FAR Area (sq. m.) Built up Area (sq. m.)

Phase I (existing)

1. Pre-Engineering Blocks FAR Area (sq. m.) Built up Area (sq. m.)

a. Block 1 1172.24 1172.24

b. Block 2 3252.01 3252.01

c. Block 3 2646.98 2646.98

d. Block 4 2243.64 2243.64

Total 9314.87 9314.87

Phase II (Proposed)

1. Technical Block (Engineering Block)

Floor FAR Area (sq. m.) Built up Area (sq. m.)

a. Basement -- 3890.43

b. Ground floor 2610.97 2610.97



c. First floor 2610.97 2610.97

d. Second floor 2820.07 2820.07

e. Third floor 2820.07 2820.07

f. Fourth floor 2820.07 2820.07

g. Fifth floor 2820.07 2820.07

h. Terrace -- 305

Total 16,502.22 20,697.65

2. Hostel Block



b. Ground floor 1850.74 1850.74

c. First floor 1566.54 1566.54

d. Second floor 1566.54 1566.54

e. Third floor 1566.54 1566.54

f. Fourth floor 890.33 890.33

g. Fifth floor 890.33 890.33

h. Sixth floor 890.33 890.33

i. Seventh floor 890.33 890.33

j. Eight floor 890.33 890.33

k. Ninth floor 890.33 890.33

l. Tenth floor 890.33 890.33

m. Eleventh floor 890.33 890.33

n. Twelfth floor 890.33 890.33

o. Thirteenth floor 890.33 890.33

p. Fourteenth floor 890.33 890.33

q. Terrace -- 204

TOTAL 16343.99 18678.75

3. 2 BHK Block



b. Ground floor 713.29 713.29

c. First floor 713.29 713.29

d. Second floor 713.29 713.29



e. Third floor 713.29 713.29

f. Fourth floor 713.29 713.29

g. Fifth floor 713.29 713.29

h. Sixth floor 713.29 713.29

i. Seventh floor 713.29 713.29

j. Eight floor 713.29 713.29

k. Ninth floor 713.29 713.29

l. Tenth floor 713.29 713.29

m. Terrace -- 210

7846.19 8911.49

Grand Total 50,007.27 57,602.76

PARKING REQUIREMENT:

S. No. Particulars FAR Area Basis Total ECU required

Phase I

1. Pre-

Engineering

Blocks

9314.87 sq. m. 1 ECU/75 sq. m. of

FAR area

20% visitors

parking

150 ECU

Phase II

1. Engineering &

Hostel Block

32,846.21 sq. m. 1 ECU/75 sq. m. of

FAR area

20% visitors

parking

526 ECU

2. 2 BHK Block 44 units 1.5 ECU/unit 80 ECU

Grand Total 756

A. Total ECU required : 756

B. Total ECU provided : 939

Details of parking are given as:

S.

No.

Details Cars Two wheelers Bus Total

ECU

Total area

required

(sq. m.)

Total area

provided

(sq. m.)

1. Open area 515 513 (171ECU) 19(57 ECU) 743 18,575 18,575

2. Basement 147 147 (49 ECU) -- 196 6,860 6,860

Total 662 660 (220 ECU) 19 (57 ECU) 939 25,435 25,435



POWER REQUIREMENT:

Power requirement for the proposed project is given as under:

S. No. Description

1. Source of supply UHBVN, Rai

2. Electrical Load Connected load Maximum Demand

Total 4696 KW 2619 KW

Existing (Phase I) 831 KW 540 KW

Proposed (Phase II) 3865 KW 2079 KW

3. Transformer Number 2

Capacity 2000 kVA each

4. DG Sets Number 2

Capacity 250 kVA- 1 no., 625 kVA- 1 no.

Fuel HSD

Fuel Consumption 95 ltr/hr

Back Up Source:

There will be power backup for common areas and essential services through two DG sets of

cumulative capacity of 875 kVA (250 kVA: 1 no. + 625 kVA: 1 no.) used in case of power cut or

failure. DG sets will be provided with an effective safe stack height of 56 m for proper dispersion of

pollutants that will keep the emissions within the permissible limit. The fuel requirement will be

about 95 l/hr of HSD (as and when used).

CRITERIA OF WATER DEMAND:

During the operational phase (after expansion) the daily water requirement for the project will be

468 KLD (fresh water: 261 KLD and the recycled/reused water demand: 207 KLD).

Criteria of water demand are given as under:

S.

No.

Particulars Population Fresh water demand Treated water

demand

Total water

demand

1. Students 4000 @ 16 LPCD: 64 KLD @9 LPCD: 36 KLD 100 KLD

2. Hostel 500 @ 90 LPCD: 45 KLD @ 45 LPCD: 23 KLD 68 KLD

3. 2 BHK) 220 @ 90 LPCD: 20 KLD @ 45 LPCD: 10 KLD 30 KLD

4. Staff (Non-residents) 250 @ 30 LPCD: 8 KLD @ 15 LPCD: 4 KLD 12 KLD



5. Visitors 200 @ 9 LPCD: 2 KLD @ 6 LPCD: 1 KLD 3 KLD

6. Chillers 1000 TR 1000 TR x 12 l/hr/TR x 16 hrs. 192 KLD

7. Landscaping -- 63 KLD

Total 468 KLD

WATER BALANCE

Fresh water

261 KLD

Institutional 64 KLD

Residential 65 KLD

STP treated water

207 KLDLandscaping 63 KLD

222 KLD

Waste water

S

T

P

Capacity

250 KLD

Sludge &

evaporation

losses

15 KLD

Recycled/ reused for flushing & landscaping

59

60

74

Daily water demand: 468 KLD

{261 KLD (fresh) + 207 KLD (recycled/ reused water)}

Staff & Visitors10 KLD

9

Make up water for cooling tower192 KLD

20

Flushing 74 KLD

70 KLD

122 KLD

Source: Fresh Water : HUDA Water Supply; Treated Waste water: STP Treated Water



IDENTIFICATION, PREDICTION AND EVALUATION OF IMPACTS:

Environmental impact can be defined as any alteration of environmental conditions, adverse or

beneficial, caused or induced by the action or set of actions under consideration.

Various operations involved in the project have been studied in details to identify, predict and

evaluate impacts on various environmental components. The identified impacts were quantified

using mathematical models to a possible extent so as to estimate the future environmental scenario.

AIR ENVIRONMENT:

Ambient air monitoring report

Instrument used: Respirable Dust Sampler (SLE-RDS 103 & SLE-GA 133) & Fine Particle Sampler APM 550)

Sampling date: 13.11.2014-14.11.2014, Duration: 24 hrs.

Parameter Observation Permissible

(maximum)

Analysis Method & Protocol

PM10 (µg/m3) 72.5 100 IS: 5182 (P-23)

PM2.5 (µg/m3) 44.1 60 SOP-AAQ/89/01

SO2(µg/m3) 9.8 80 IS: 5182 (P-2) Improvised West & Geake

NOx(µg/m3) 26.3 80 IS: 5182 (P-6)

CO (mg/m3) <1.15 4 IS:5182 (P-10) Grab Method

* Monitoring reports enclosed as Annexure V

Instrument Sensitivity:

Instrument Range and Sensitivity

Respirable Dust Sampler (RDS) (PM-10)

0.40 – 1.5 m3/min

±0.02 m3/min

(Other gases)

0 – 3 LPM

± 0.2 LPM

Fine Particulate Sampler (PM – 2.5) : ±0.03 DGM m3

Wind Pattern Data & Rose Diagram:

Directions /

Wind Classes

(m/s)

1.0 -

1.4

1.4 -

1.9

1.9 -

2.4

2.4 -

3.9

3.9 -

5.5

5.5 -

7.0

7.0 -

8.5

8.5 -

10.1

>=

10.1 Total

1 348.75 - 11.25 4 0 32 14 18 10 7 3 4 92

2 11.25 - 33.75 2 0 23 15 27 16 9 7 3 102

3 33.75 - 56.25 0 0 31 17 43 23 13 5 13 145



4 56.25 - 78.75 1 0 35 20 33 39 8 9 6 151

5 78.75 - 101.25 2 0 40 21 54 35 10 9 8 179

6 101.25 - 123.75 0 0 36 26 41 29 11 7 9 159

7 123.75 - 146.25 0 0 54 35 57 39 13 3 8 209

8 146.25 - 168.75 0 0 44 27 29 29 18 9 7 163

9 168.75 - 191.25 2 0 38 20 23 22 10 5 2 122

10 191.25 - 213.75 1 0 23 6 10 5 1 0 5 51

11 213.75 - 236.25 1 0 15 11 13 2 0 0 3 45

12 236.25 - 258.75 3 0 37 13 22 4 3 0 0 82

13 258.75 - 281.25 0 0 17 11 14 3 2 0 1 48

14 281.25 - 303.75 0 0 27 22 10 6 2 1 6 74

15 303.75 - 326.25 0 0 20 15 7 6 5 4 4 61

16 326.25 - 348.75 3 0 28 17 14 10 10 2 2 86

Sub-Total 19 0 500 290 415 278 122 64 81 1769

Calms 438

Total 2208



CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES OF POLLUTION:

1. Vehicular Exhaust:

The major source of pollution in construction phase will be vehicles carrying construction

material. Pollution load from the same is calculated as :

Pollution Load = No. of trucks × Emission Factors × Deterioration Factor

Due to movement of average 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

Parameter Emission Factor

(g /km)*

Deterioration Factor

(g /km)*

Pollution Load

(g/km)

CO 4.5 1.33 29.92

NOx 1.21 1 6.05

SPM 0.8 1.595 6.38

SO2 0.15 1 0.75

HC 1.21 1 6.05

* Source : CPCB Publication, 1998

2. Emissions from Construction equipments:

The fugitive dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

Emissions factors for construction equipment are given in table below:

Equipment Emissions Factors (g/hr)

CO VOC NOX SOX PM10

Excavator 214.09 43.99 516.18 3.31 27.21

Backhoe/ Front end loader 190.05 56.69 370.13 1.58 37.64

Rubber tired crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Hydraulic Crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Concrete Vibrator 72.57 13.60 122.46 0 4.53

Paving Equipment 186.42 48.53 412.31 1.95 29.93

Roller/ Compactor 165.10 34.92 316.15 1.90 23.13

*Source: SCAQMD CEQA Hanbook



MITIGATION MEASURES:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

Dust & emissions from

vehicular exhaust.

• Regular sprinkling of water on the haul-road.

• Speed restriction of all vehicles.

• Vehicles will be checked for PUC certification.

The dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

• Water spraying to prevent dust pollution from different sources

of construction.

• All transportation vehicles will be suitably covered &

overloading of the vehicles will be avoided.

• Covering of the construction site on all four sides to a

considerable height to prevent dust emissions and other

pollutants to the surrounding environment.

• Ensuring vehicles stick to the access track to prevent mud and

dirt being deposited on roads.

POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES:

1. Carbon Foot Print (GHG emission) :

Estimated “Carbon Footprint” emissions per annum after commissioning of project due to

direct sources of green house gas (GHG) is given as:

Sources CO2 e (T) / annum (Baseline ) CO2 e (T) / annum With EMP

LPG 12 8

Transport 24 17

Waste Water & MSW 803 562

DG 1.75 1.35

TOTAL 216.14 588.35

Source:

[1. * Brander et al., Aug 2011; 2. **WHO Publication No 62 ; 3. ***CPCB Publication 1998; 4.****IPCC Guidelines, 2006]



2. DG sets:

The source of emission will be from two D.G. sets of cumulative capacity of 875 kVA (250

kVA; 1 no. + 625 kVA; 1 no.) which will be used in case of power cuts or failure.

Calculation of stack height of D.G. set

a) DG set of capacity 250 kVA:

The stack height of DG set is calculated as under:

H = 0.2 (√capacity of the DG set in kVA)

= 0.2 x (√250)

= 0.2 x 15.81 = 3.16 m

b) DG set of capacity 625 kVA:

The stack height of DG set is calculated as under:

H = 0.2 (√capacity of the DG set in kVA)

= 0.2 x (√625)

= 0.2 x 25 = 5 m

However, a safe stack height of 56 m above the roof of DG house will be provided.

MANAGEMENT PLAN

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Exhaust from D.G. sets • DG sets conforming to the CPCB standards will be deployed.

• D.G. sets will be provided with effective stack height of 56 m above

the roof of DG house.

• Low-sulphur-content fuel (HSD - Sulphur content 0.05%) will be

used.

• Emission due to

vehicular exhausts

especially congestions

during peak traffic hours.

• Sufficient width of driveways to ensure smooth traffic movements.

• Provisions of fully internalized parking including the parking facilities

for the visitors.

• Guided traffic ways within the project site.

• Speed humps will be installed for speed restrictions inside the project

area.



WATER ENVIRONMENT:

GROUND WATER ANALYSIS REPORT*

Date of sampling: 13.11.2014 Location: Near Project site

Parameter Results Complete Test as Per IS :10500-1991 Protocol

Desirable Limit Permissible Limit

Physical Parameters

Colour, Hazen Units <5.0 5 Max 25 Max IS:3025 (Part 4) 1983

Odour Agreeable Agreeable - IS:3025 (Part 5) 1983

Taste Agreeable Agreeable - IS:3025 (Part 8) 1984

Turbidity, NTU <1.0 5 .0 10.0 IS:3025 (Part 8) 1984

pH value 7.14 6.5 - 8.5 - IS:3025 (Part 11) 1983

Chemical Parameters

Total Hardness as CaCO3 448.0 300 mg/l 600 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 21) 2009

Calcium( as Ca), mg/l 72.1 75 mg/l 200 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 40) 1991

Iron (as Fe), mg/l <0.1 0.3 mg/l 1.0 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 53) 2003

Chloride (as Cl), mg/l 33.7 250 mg/l 1000 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 32) 1988

Residual Free Chlorine, mg/l <0.2 0.2 -- IS:3025 (Part 26) 1986

Fluoride (as F), mg/l <1.0 1.0 1.5 IS:3025 (Part 60) 2008

Total Dissolved solids, mg/l 560.0 500 mg/l 2000 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 16)1984

Magnesium (as Mg), mg/l 65.1 30 mg/l 100 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 46) 1994

Copper (as Cu), mg/l <0.01 0.05 mg/l 1.5 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 42) 1992

Manganese as Mn <0.1 0.1 mg/l 0.3 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 59) 2006

Sulphate (as SO4), mg/l 104.2 200 mg/l 400 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 24) 1986

Nitrate (as NO3), mg/l 6.09 45.0 mg/l No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 34) 1988

Phenolic compounds, mg/l <0.001 0.001 mg/l 0.002 IS:3025 (Part 43) 1992

Mercury(as Hg), mg/l <0.001 0.001 mg/l No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 48) 1994

Selenium(as Se),mg/l <0.005 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 56) 2003

Arsenic (as As), mg/l <0.005 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 37) 1988

Cyanide(as Cn),mg/l <0.05 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 27) 1986

Lead( as Pb), mg/l <0.005 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 47) 1994

Zinc (as Zn),mg/l <0.05 5 15 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 49) 1984

Chromium (as Cr),mg/l <0.05 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 52) 2003

Alkalinity (as CaCO3), mg/l 392.0 200.0 mg/l 600 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 23) 1986

Aluminum (as Al), mg/l <0.01 0.03 mg/l 0.2 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 55) 2003

Boron (as B), mg/l <0.25 1.0 mg/l 5 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 11) 1983

Cadmium(as Cd), mg/l <0.001 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 41) 1992

Anionic detergents (as MBAS),

mg/l

<0.05 0.2 1 mg/l APHA 5540-C

Microbiological Parameters

Total coliform (MPN/100 ml) <1.8 - 10.0 (Max) APHA 9221

Escherichia coli/100 ml Absent - Absent APHA 9221

*Monitoring report enclosed as Annexure V



CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Significant water

demand for

construction.

• Curing water will be sprayed and after liberal curing all concrete

structures will be covered with gunny bags this will conserve water.

• There will be provision of using polymer dispersion and air entraining

agents to reduce the water demand for construction.

• Un-captured run-off

from the site may

contaminate ground

water aquifers.

• The rain-water entering into the pit will be screened for the removal of

heavy silt and other materials.

• Provisions will be made to ensure the construction vehicles stick to the

access track to prevent mud & dirt being deposited on roads.

• Fence will be constructed around the site to trap sediments whilst

allowing the water to flow through.

• Up slope water will be diverted with turf and due care will be taken not

to mix mortar in locations that will drain into storm water system.

• Unsanitary conditions

during rainy season.

• The civil contractor will be made responsible for site sanitation and will

be bound by the management to adhere to healthy level of sanitation.

• There will be no stagnant water at site, as the runoff from the relevant

areas will be systematically drained into the storm water line. There

will be provision of cleaning the storm water line periodically.


Daily fresh water demand will be 261 KLD (95,265 cu. m./annum). The fresh water demand will

be met from HUDA water supply.

WASTE WATER GENERATION AND TREATMENT:

Sewage treatment plan

Approximate 222 KLD waste water will be generated which will be treated in STP of capacity 250

KLD. Physico chemical characteristics of influent and effluent are given as:

Parameters Influent Treated effluent

pH 7.5 - 8.5 7 - 8

Suspended solids 200- 225 mg/l <50 mg/l



BOD 200 - 250 mg/l <30 mg/l

COD 350 - 400 mg/l <60 mg/l

Oil & Grease 20-25 mg/l <5 mg/l

Coliform (CFU /100 ml) 103- 10

5 50-500 or less

Mitigation Measures:

S.

No.

Anticipated impacts Mitigation measures / Management

1. • Daily water demand 261 KLD

(95,265 cu. m./ annum).

• Daily fresh water demand reduced by 44.23% after

implementation of Environment Management Plan which

will be met from HUDA water supply.

• The maximum annual recharge will be to the tune of 48,236

cu. m. by harvesting the storm water.

2. • Daily waste water generation:

222 KLD

• Surface / ground water

contamination

• Waste water will be treated in sewage treatment plant of

capacity of 250 KLD.

• Treated water from STP will be used for flushing (74 KLD),

plantation (63 KLD) and make up for cooling tower (70

KLD).

3. • Monitoring use of water • Water meters will be installed to control the overflow losses

and to monitor the water usage at the following points :

� Fresh water intake

� Inlet of flushing tanks

� STP inlet

� STP outlet

� Landscaping

4. • Un-captured storm water run-

off.

• Flooding or logging of storm

water drains

• The runoff from the building terraces, paved areas and

landscape areas will be channelized to the rain-water

harvesting structures designed on the peak intensity of rainfall

(90 mm/hr) to accommodate peak surface run-off, which will

avoid the problems of flooding.

• The storm-water drains will be cleaned in the pre-monsoon

phase so that the water logging can be avoided.



RAINWATER HARVESTING SCHEME:

Baseline Data:

The average annual rainfall (based on last 10 years rainfall data) is 541 mm.

Rain Fall Data (last 10 years):

Year Rainfall (mm)

2004 603.9

2005 555.7

2006 306.2

2007 304.1

2008 791.4

2009 582.8

2010 766.4

2011 558

2012 361.8

2013 576.5

Average 540.68

Source: Indian Meteorological Department

CALCULATION OF RWH STRUCTURES:

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall

(m/hour) [I]

Total discharge

[Q = CIA]

(m3/hr)

1. Roof Top 14,512.83 0.9 0.09 1175.54

2. Landscape 58,138.96 0.3 0.09 1569.75

3. Paved 50,922.09 0.75 0.09 3437.25

4. Open 68,220.36 0.3 0.09 1841.95

Grand Total (1-4) 1,91,794.24 8024.49

VOLUME OF RAIN WATER DRAINAGE

Total Rain Water Flow : 8024.49 m3/hr

Considering 15 minutes of peak rainfall,

Runoff volume : 2006.12 m3/hr

Volume of each pit : 72 m3 (Dia: 4.5 m; H: 4.5 m)



Total no. of rain water harvesting pits required : Total run-off volume/volume of each pit

= 2006.12/72

= 27.86 say 28 nos.

However, 48 Nos. rain Water Harvesting pit with PVC slotted pipe up to minimum depth of 30 m

will be constructed.

TOTAL RAIN WATER RECHARGE THROUGH RAINWATER HARVESTING:

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall [I]

(m/annum)

Total discharge

[Q= CIA]

(m3/ annum)

1. Roof Top 14,512.83 0.9 0.541 7066.30

2. Landscape 58,138.96 0.3 0.541 9435.95

3. Paved 50,922.09 0.75 0.541 20661.63

4. Open 68,220.36 0.3 0.541 11072.16

Grand Total (1-4) 1,91,794.24 48236.04 say 48236

Total Annual Recharge to Ground Water Regime of the area through rainwater harvesting structure

would be 48236 m3/ annum.

For good design of rainwater harvesting, following points are to be kept under consideration:

• Ideal location with good ground slope.

• The location has adequate subsurface permeability of the aquifer to accommodate maximum

recharge of rainwater through injection well.

• Rate of filtration should exceed average rainfall intensity.

• Clogging of filtration media should be cleaned periodically.

• Ground water pollution does not take place.



SOIL ENVIRONMENT:

SOIL ANALYSIS

Location: Project Site ; Date of sampling: 12.11.2014

S. No. Parameter Units Results Test Methods

1. pH (1: 2.5 Suspension) - 6.59 IS: 2720 (P-26)

2. Conductivity (1:5 Susp.) µS/cm 368.0 IS: 2720 (P-21)

3. Texture (Clay) % by mass 45.9 SOP-S/92/16

4. Texture (Sand) 30.7

5. Texture (Silt) 23.4

6. Colour - Light brown SOP-S/92/14

7. Water holding capacity % by mass 39.2 SOP-S/92/21

8. Bulk density gm/cc 1.18 SOP-S/92/12

9. Chloride (as Cl-) mg/kg 90.7 Ministry of Agriculture

Manual 2011 10. Sodium available (as Na) mg/kg 152.6

11. Potassium available (as K) mg/kg 190.8

12. Organic matter % by mass 0.69 IS: 2720 (P-22)

13. Total Kjehldal Nitrogen mg/kg 920.7 SOP-S/92/06

14. Phosphorous (as P) mg/kg 62.9 Ministry of Agriculture

Manual 2011

15. Zinc (as Zn) mg/kg 12.7 SOP-S/96/11

16. Cadmium (as Cd) mg/kg <0.1 SOP-S/92/11

17. Copper (as Cu) mg/kg <0.1 SOP-S/96/11

18. Porosity % by mass 11.2 SOP-S/92/22

19. Permeability - Permeable SOP-S/92/26

20. Boron (as B) mg/kg 0.98 SOP-S/92/13

21. Moisture content % by mass 7.24 IS: 2720 (P-2)

22. Iron (as Fe) mg/kg 0.06 SOP-S/96/11

23. Alkali metals mg/kg 342.0 SOP-S/92/11

24. Lithium mg/kg <0.1 SOP-S/92/11

*Monitoring report is enclosed as Annexure V



CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

• The solid waste generated during construction phase will be excavated soil (

which will be reutilized within the project site.

• About 1299 MT of the construction waste will be generated. Details of the same is given as

under:

S. No. Particulars

1. Wood

2. Dry Wall

3. Concrete

4. Metal Scrap

5. Cardboard

6. Plastics

7. Electronic Scrap

8. Misc.(Paint, Ceramic etc)


The solid waste generated from the project considering full occupancy will be approx

out of which 449 kg/day will be generated from educational blocks and remaining 360 kg/day will

be generated from residential blocks (Hostel & 2 BHK block)

first segregated as plastic, glass, paper, and other waste separately and disposed off as per MSW

Rules.

Phase II


The solid waste generated during construction phase will be excavated soil (

which will be reutilized within the project site.

MT of the construction waste will be generated. Details of the same is given as

Particulars Approx. Qty, (MT)

624 Sold to vendors

260 Disposal site.

117 Disposal site.

26 Sold to

194 Sold to vendors

26 Sold to vendors

Electronic Scrap 26 Disposal site.

Misc.(Paint, Ceramic etc) 26 Disposal site.


solid waste generated from the project considering full occupancy will be approx


be generated from residential blocks (Hostel & 2 BHK block). The solid waste generated will be


Conceptual Plan &


The solid waste generated during construction phase will be excavated soil (10,000 cu. m.)

MT of the construction waste will be generated. Details of the same is given as

Disposal

Sold to vendors

Disposal site.

Disposal site.

Sold to vendors

Sold to vendors

Sold to vendors

Disposal site.

Disposal site.

solid waste generated from the project considering full occupancy will be approx 809 kg/day


id waste generated will be




S. No. Bins Particulars Quantity Treatment Disposal

Educational Blocks

1. Green Binm Vegetable 117 kg/day No in-situ treatment.

Collected and stored

at designated places.

Will be sent to

Municipality

disposal sites.

2. Wood 59 kg/day

3. Grey Bin Plastic 40 kg/day

4. Can 27 kg/day

5. Rock 63 kg/day

6. Blue Bin Paper Waste 85 kg/day Efforts to recycle to

the best possible

extent.

Sent to the vendors

for recycling. 7. Textile 9 kg/day

8. Pack 58 kg/day

Residential Blocks (Hostel & 2BHK)

1. Green

(households)

Compostable waste

• Kitchen waste

• Garden waste

291 kg/day No in-situ treatment.



Will be sent to

Municipality

disposal sites.

2. Dark grey bins

(households)

Non – biodegradable +

recyclable waste:

• Plastics

• Metal cans

• Glassware

• Misc.

48 kg/day

• 39 kg/day

• 2 kg/day

• 5 kg/day

• 2 kg/day

No in-situ treatment.



Will be sent to

Municipality

disposal sites.

3. Blue

(households)

Paper waste

• Paper

• Newspaper

• Cardboards

• Packing material

21 kg/day

Efforts to recycle to

the best possible

extent.

Will be collected on

daily basis.

Sent to the vendors

for recycling.

Source: Seemann, 06



BIODIVERSITY

BIODIVERSITY STATUS OF SRM UNIVERSITY PROJECT SITE

Floral and faunal components are an important part of urban ecosystem and provide significant

ecosystem services. While the development has continued, the infrastructure and urban areas being

developed have substantial impact on biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impact of

urbanization on biodiversity becomes imperative not only from the point of view of conservation,

but also for planning sustainable cities. A habitat loss, urban development produces some of the

greatest local extinction rates and frequently eliminates the large majority of native species. Also,

urbanization is often more lasting than other types of habitat loss. Another great conservation

challenge of urban growth is that it replaces the native species that are lost with wide spread

“weedy” nonnative species. This replacement constitutes the process of biotic homogenization that

threatens to reduce the biological uniqueness of local ecosystems.

Description of the flora and fauna of the project site / it’s vicinity, their habitats and their

description is necessary to help identify potential impacts on each species. Occurrence of rare,

threatened, or endangered species within area need to be noted. Biological impact assessment

generally includes listing of plants and animals present in the vicinity of the proposed project site.

Detailed ecological survey of the site was conducted to identify existing flora and fauna (i.e. trees,

shrubs, herbs, grasses, herpetofauna, avifauna and mammals).

STUDY AREA

Ecologically, project site is situated in the urban ecosystem and agro-ecosystem setting.

METHODOLOGY

Biodiversity inventorization was carried out to understand floral and faunal components of the

project site

Flora: Project site is do posses dense vegetation which do not require quantification. However, all

plant species were enlisted.

Fauna: For birds, Opportunistic sighting of all birds / avifaunal species during perambulation were

recorded to prepare checklist. Identification by calls was also made for species which were not

directly encountered or were hidden in the tree canopy. Similarly, area searches were carried out to

locate the species herpetofaunal species. Presence of mammals was documented by using both

direct and indirect (i.e. animal burrows / holes, scat, pellets, feeding signs, and tracks evidences).



BIODIVERSITY STATUS OF THE STUDY AREA

Flora: Project site possess different plants species under three categories,

1. Existing landscaping vegetation (trees)

2. Other natural vegetation (herbs / shrubs)

3. Existing naturally grown trees

Table-1: Existing Landscaping Plantation in the Project Site

S. No. Scientific Name Plant Name Number of Plants

1. Azadirachta indica Neem 12

2. Dalbergia sissoo Sisham 1

3. Pterospermum acerifolium Kanak Champa 5

4. Delonix regia Gulmohar 1

5. Grevillea robusta Silver oak 14

6. Ficus benjamina Benjamina / Pukar 12

7. Ficus virens Pilkhan 90

8. Saraca asoca / Polyalthia longifolia Ashoka 40

9. Syzygium cumini Jammun 7

10. Neolamarckia cadamba Kadam 50

11. Alstonia scholaris Alestonia / Chitvan 50

12. Albizia saman Samia / Gulabi Siris 4

13. Cassia fistula Amaltash 5

14. Magnolia champaca / Plumeria rubra Champa 25

Total 316

Table-2: Other Natural Vegetation (herbs / shrubs / Grasses)

Sr. No. Scientific Name Common Name

1 Physalis lanceolata --

2 Portulaca olerasea Lunia

3 Cassia roxburghii Cassia

4 Biophytum sensitivum Lajalu

5 Parthenium hysterophorus Gajarghas

6 Argemone mexicana Siarkanta

7 Calotropis procera Aak

8 Xanthium strumarium Chota Dhatura / Gokharu

9 Cynodon daetylon Doob

10 Eragrostis tenella Bhurbhusi



Herbs Reported From the Project Site

Physalis lanceolata Portulaca olerasea

Cassia roxburghii Biophytum sensitivum

Parthenium hysterophorus Argemone mexicana



Calotropis procera Xanthium strumarium

Table-3: Existing Trees within Project Site (Naturally Grown)

S. No. Scientific Name Common name Numbers Girth Size in Centimetres

1. Madhuca longifolia Mahua 1 134.

2. Dalbergia sissoo Sisham 3 126, 70, 126.

3. Eucalyptus globulus Safeda 8 136, 120, 115, 90, 140, 131, 119,

123

4. Psidium guajava Amrood 2 40, 46.

5. Mangifera indica Mango 5 74, 65, 127, 110, 176.

6. Syzygium cumini Jamun 7 180, 106, 96, 165, 176, 135, 140.

7. Morus alba Sahtoot 2 21, 23.

8. Azadirachta indica Neem 7 63, 77, 26, 45, 75, 85, 79.

9. Citrus limon Leamon 1 23.

10. Artocarpus heterophyllusJackfruit 1 124.

11. Ziziphus mauritiana Ber 1 72.

Total number of trees exists in the site are 38

Fauna: Since the project site is situated in the urban ecosystem and agro-ecosystem environment,

all the species reported were common. Mammals and birds were observed during survey. Among

mammals, only Five-striped Palm Squirrel i.e. Funambulus pennantii were observed within the

project site. All birds are tabulated in the following table.

Table-4: List of Birds Reported from the Project site and Migratory Status

Common Name Scientific Name Status

I: Order: Columbiformes

Family: Columbidae



Rock Pigeon Columba livia R

Ii: Order: Coraciformes

Family: Centropodidae

Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis R

Family: Cuculidae

Koel Eudynamys scolopacea R

Iv. Order: Passeriformes

Family: Corvidae

House Crow Corvus splendens R

Family: Muscicapidae

Indian Robin Saxicoloides fulicata R

Family: Passeridae

House Sparrow Passer domesticus R

Family: Pycnonotidae

Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer R

Family: Sturnidae

Common Myna Acridotheres tristis R

Status: R = Residents

IMPACT IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATORY MEASURES

Clearing of existing vegetation

Land clearing and removal of vegetation cover at the project site likely to have the following minor

direct/primary impacts.

Impact on flora

Impact 1: Loss of habitat, habitat fragmentation?

Evaluation& mitigation: Project site comprises plantation, common herbs and grasses and

naturally grown trees. Only herbs and grasses will be cleared while all existing trees will be

retained. So, clearing of herbs and grass species will not result in the Loss of habitat, habitat

fragmentation in true sense.

Impact on fauna

Impact 2:Impact on major faunal groups (terrestrial avifauna and mammals)?

Evaluation & mitigation: Project site has been reported with one species of mammals (squirrel)

and eight species of the avifauna. All recorded species are common and well adapted to the routine

urban activities so they will not face significant impact. Due to their abundant, wider distribution

and inhabiting diverse habitat types, the impact due to the project and related activities may not be



significant. Surrounding habitats the study area comprises good diversity in terms of all

components as compare to the project site. During construction phase, all the faunal species

reported from the project site can disperse in the surrounding habitats temporarily. So impact will

be in the acceptable limits. In the post construction phase further landscaping will help to re-

establish reported species.

Biodiversity Appraisal

All floral and faunal species recorded from the study area are widely distributed in the surrounding

environ as well as other regions and are common species; no any major negative impacts are

envisaged on the biota due to the upcoming project and its associated activities.

EMP FOR ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

Environmental Management Plan is a key approach and follows up of environmental/biological

study to reduce or control the identified expected impacts resulting from the proposed project

related activities.

Landscaping Plantation: Environmental requirements and species adoptability are the most

important factors need to consider while selecting tree species for greenbelt development. For the

selection of tree species, environmental requirement and species adoptability information was

acquired from Hocking (1993). Selection of the plant species will be based on their adaptability to

the existing geographical conditions and the vegetation composition of the forest type of the

region. During the development of the landscaping within the project area, it has to be emphasized

that those local plant species should be planted which are having good ornamental values and are

fast growing with excellent canopy cover.

Landscaping / green belt is provided to mitigate various emissions. Green belts are wide strip of

trees and shrubs planted in rows to reduce air velocity there by facilitating settling of the particles

on the leaf surfaces and allowing absorption of the pollutant gases. It also serves to cool the

atmosphere by transpiration from the leaf surface and also provide habitat for birds, reptiles and

insects. The advantages of a green belt are given below:

Landscaping / Greenbelt is important habitats for birds and animals, which add to the aesthetic

value of the environment. Generally, birds prefer to make their habitat, nest, on trees. Further trees

provide shade and hiding places to wild life.

• Greenbelt helps to restore the ecological balance.



• Greenbelt helps in prevention of soil erosion.

• Greenbelt helps to improve the aesthetics in the area.

• The greenbelt also diminishes noise pollution by absorbing high degree of noise due to

their spongy foliar crown.

Selection criteria of Plant species: The selection of plant species for the development depends on

various factors such as climate, elevation and soil. The list of plant species that can be suitably

planted and having significant importance are provided in the following table. The plants should

exhibit the following required characteristic in order to be selected for plantation.

• The species should be fast growing and providing optimum penetrability.

• The species should be wind-firm and deep-rooted.

• The species should form a dense canopy.

• As far as possible, the species should be indigenous and locally available

• Species tolerance to air pollutants like SPM, SOx and NOx should be preferred.

• The species should be permeable to help create air turbulence and mixing within the

belt.

• There should be no large gaps for the air to spill through

• Trees with high foliage density, leaves with larger leaf area and hairy on both the

surfaces.

• Ability to withstand conditions like flood and drought

• Soil improving plants (Nitrogen fixing, rapidly decomposable leaf litter).

• Attractive appearance with good flowering and fruit bearing

• Bird and insect attracting tree species

• Sustainable green cover with minimal maintenance

Some tree species for green belt development/plantation are as follows. However tree species

already reported from the project site will be also considered for plantation.

Table-4: Suggested Plant species Landscaping / Greenbelt Development

Plant Name Binomial Name Important Features Estimated no. of

plants required

Trees

Gulmohar Delonix regia* Increases aesthetic beauty 150

Royal Palm Roystonea regia Increases aesthetic beauty 100

Khajoor Phoenix dactylifera* Dust capturing plant 100

Sahajan Moringa olieifera* Dust capturing plant 150

Papdi Holoptelia integrifolia* Dust capturing plant 200



Amaltas Cassia fistula* Efficient dust capturing plant, air

pollution 150

Ashok Saraca indica* Noise pollution reducer 300

Neem Azardirachta indica* Air pollution reducer 300

Jacaranda Jacaranda cuspidifolia Dust capturing plant 100

Palas Butea monosperma* Increases aesthetic beauty and

dust capturing 100

Pipal Ficus religiosa* Air pollution reducer and dust

capturing, state tree of harayana. 50

Rohida Tecomell aundulata Native species increases aesthetic

beauty 50

Total Number of Trees to be Planted 1750

Herbs

Genda Tagetes patula* --

Elephant’s Ear Colocasiaantiquorum* --

Shrubs

Chandni Tabernaemontanadivaricata * --

Bougainvillea Bougainvillea glavara* (High Dust Capturing plat) --

Gurhal Hibiscus rosasinensis* (High Dust Capturing plat) --

*Source: phytoremediation of particulate matter from ambient environment through dust capturing plant species,

CPCB 2007.

Plant requirement may increase or decrease.

Plantation Monitoring Protocol

• The plantations need to be managed by regular watering, soil enrichment work (applying

manure) weeding and provide proper protection.

• Replacement of sapling (replanting) required whenever mortality occurs in the plantation

during the growth stage.

• Plantation requires after care for a period of minimum four years till the saplings recruit

properly and attain its matured tree stage.

• Any damage to the developed greenbelt due to natural disaster should be redeveloped and

maintained by the agency.



ELECTRICAL HAZARDS SAFETY MEASURE PLAN

DEFINITION

Electrical Hazard –

A dangerous condition such that contact or equipment failure can result in Electric shock, arc-flash

burn, thermal burn, or blast. Electrical hazard includes ‘dangerous’ meaning ‘able or likely to

inflict injury’; there are high voltage, low current sources that are not intrinsically dangerous, and

there are low-voltage, high-current sources that are not ‘safe’. A ‘harmless’ static electricity shock

could cause sufficient startle reaction to make a worker fall off a ladder. A hazard analysis is

necessary to identify electrical hazards and determine the degree of risk. We are considering

different types of measures for preventing electrical hazards which are as follows:

Safe Electrical Installation

� Installation of new electrical systems to a suitable IS standard. Requirements for electrical

installations, and then maintain them in a safe condition;

� Provision of enough socket-outlets - overloading socket-outlets by using adaptors which can

cause fire.

Provision of safe and suitable equipment:

� Proper selection of equipments;

� There will be provision of an accessible and clearly identified switch near each fixed

machine to cut off power in an emergency;

� For portable equipment, there will be use of socket-outlets which are close by so that

equipment will be easily disconnected in an emergency;

� The ends of flexible cables will always have the outer sheath of the cable firmly clamped to

stop the wires (particularly the earth) pulling out of the terminals;

� There will be use of proper connectors or cable couplers to join lengths of cable

� There will be proper protection of light bulbs and other equipment which could easily be

damaged in use. And also creates risk of electric shock if they are broken;

� Electrical equipment used in flammable/explosive atmospheres will be designed to stop it

from causing ignition.



Reduction of Voltage:-

One of the best ways of reducing the risk of injury when using electrical equipment is to limit the

supply voltage to the lowest needed to get the job done, such as:

Temporary lighting can be run at lower voltages, e.g. 12, 25, 50 or 110 volts;

� Where electrically powered tools are used, battery operated will be safest;

� Portable tools are readily available which are designed to be run from a 110 volts centre-

tapped-to-earth supply.

Provision of safety device

If equipment will be operated at 230 volts or on higher, then the provision of an RCD (residual

current device) will be provided as an additional safety. An RCD is a device which detects some,

but not all, faults in the electrical system and rapidly switches off the supply. RCD will be built

into the main switchboard or the socket-outlet, as this means that the supply cables will be

permanently protected. Additionally a plug incorporating an RCD, or a plug-in RCD adaptor, will

also be provided for an additional safety. RCDs for protecting people have a rated tripping current

(sensitivity) of not more than 30 milliamps (MA).

� An RCD is a valuable safety device, never bypass it;

� If the RCD trips, it is a sign there is a fault.

� The RCD will have a test button to check that its mechanism is free and functioning.

Work safely

We will make sure that people who are working with electricity are competent to do the job. Even

simple tasks such as wiring a plug can lead to danger – we will ensure that people know what they

are doing before they start.

We must not allow work on or near exposed live parts of equipment unless it is absolutely

unavoidable and suitable precautions will be taken to prevent injury, both to the workers and to

anyone else who may be in the area.

Underground power cables

Always assume cables will be present when digging in the street, pavement or near buildings. The

usage will be up-to-date service plans, cable avoidance tools and safe digging practice to avoid

danger.



Overhead power lines

When working near overhead lines, it may be possible to have them switched off. So, we will k

the safe working distance from the cables.

BASIC PRECAUTIONS:

There are various ways of protecting people from the hazards caused by electricity, including

insulation, guarding, grounding and electrical protective devices. We will significant re

electrical hazards by following some basic precautions.

Insulation

All electrical cords will have sufficient insulation to prevent direct contact with wires. All cords

will be checked before each use, since corrosive chemicals or solvent vapors may erode

insulation. Damaged cords will be repaired or taken out of service immediately, especially in wet

environments such as cold rooms

Guarding

Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more will be guarded against accidental

contact. Plexiglas shields may be used to protect against exposed live parts.

Grounding

Only equipment with three

provides a path to ground that helps prevent the buildup of voltages that

may result in an electrical shock or spark.

Circuit Protection Devices

Circuit protection devices will be desig

in the event of a ground-fault, overload, or short circuit in the wiring system. Fuses, circuit

breakers, and ground-fault circuit interrupters are three well

Fuses and circuit breakers prevent over

create hazards for operators. They disconnect the circuit when it becomes overloaded. The ground

Phase II


When working near overhead lines, it may be possible to have them switched off. So, we will k

the safe working distance from the cables.


insulation, guarding, grounding and electrical protective devices. We will significant re

electrical hazards by following some basic precautions.


will be checked before each use, since corrosive chemicals or solvent vapors may erode


environments such as cold rooms


exiglas shields may be used to protect against exposed live parts.

Only equipment with three-prong plugs will be used. The third prong


may result in an electrical shock or spark.

Circuit protection devices will be designed to automatically limit or shut off the flow of electricity

fault, overload, or short circuit in the wiring system. Fuses, circuit

fault circuit interrupters are three well-known examples of such devices.

uses and circuit breakers prevent over-heating of wires and components that might otherwise

create hazards for operators. They disconnect the circuit when it becomes overloaded. The ground

Conceptual Plan &


When working near overhead lines, it may be possible to have them switched off. So, we will keep


insulation, guarding, grounding and electrical protective devices. We will significant reduce


will be checked before each use, since corrosive chemicals or solvent vapors may erode the



prong plugs will be used. The third prong


ned to automatically limit or shut off the flow of electricity

fault, overload, or short circuit in the wiring system. Fuses, circuit

known examples of such devices.

heating of wires and components that might otherwise

create hazards for operators. They disconnect the circuit when it becomes overloaded. The ground-



fault circuit interrupter or GFCI, will be used to shutoff electric power if a ground fault is detected.

The GFCI will be particularly used near sinks and wet locations. Since GFCIs will cause

equipment to shutdown unexpectedly, they may not be appropriate for certain apparatus. Portable

GFCI adapters (available in most safety supply catalogs) may be used with a non-GFCI outlet.

Safe Work Practices

The following practices will be used to reduce the risk of injury or fire when working with

electrical equipment:

� Avoid contact with energized electrical circuits.

� Disconnect the power source before servicing or repairing electrical equipment.

� When it is necessary to handle equipment that is plugged in, be sure hands are dry and, when

possible, wear nonconductive gloves and shoes with insulated soles.

� If it is not unsafe to do so, work with only one hand, keeping the other hand at your side or

in your pocket, away from all conductive material. This precaution reduces the likelihood of

accidents that result in current passing through the chest cavity.

� If water or a chemical is spilled onto equipment, shut off power at the main switch or circuit

breaker and unplug the equipment.

� If an individual comes in contact with a live electrical conductor, do not touch the

equipment, cord or person. Disconnect the power source from the circuit breaker or pull out

the plug using a leather belt.

High Voltage or Current

Repairs of high voltage or high current equipment will be performed by trained electricians.

Individuals who are experienced in such tasks and would like to perform such work on their own

equipment must first receive specialized electrical safety related work practices training by EHS

staff.



EARTHING:

Typical Plate earthling and chemical earthling will be done. Typical la

below:

EXPENDITURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES:

S. No. Particulars

1. Acoustic enclosures & stack attached to DG sets

2 STP

3 Rain water harvesting

4 Solid waste management

5 Pollution monitoring

6 Fire fighting & emergency handling

7 Green Belt

8 Training in the area of environment &

occupational health.

TOTAL

Phase II


Typical Plate earthling and chemical earthling will be done. Typical layout of the same is given

EXPENDITURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES:

Particulars Capital Cost Annual recurring cost

Acoustic enclosures & stack attached to DG sets 4 lacs

30 lacs

56 lacs

Solid waste management 5 lacs

--

Fire fighting & emergency handling 30 lacs

50 lacs

Training in the area of environment & 1 lacs

TOTAL 176 Lacs

********

Conceptual Plan &


yout of the same is given

Annual recurring cost

0.5 lacs

5 lacs

5 lacs

1 lacs

1.5 lacs

2 lacs

2 lacs

1 lacs

18 Lacs

CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/25032015U5VFK490CP&EMP.pdf · CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION:

Documents