8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
1/16
1
COMPARISON TABLE
HREPS SENATE RA
Sec.3. Terrorism. Terrorism is the
premeditated threatened or actual use
of violence or force or any other means
that deliberately tend to cause or
actually cause harm to persons, or of
force and other destructive means
against property or the environment,
with the intention of creating or sowing
a state of danger, panic, fear or chaos to
the general public or segment thereof,
or of coercing or intimidating the
government to do or refrain from doing
an act.
Sec. 3. Terrorism, How Committed.
Terrorism is committed by any person or
group of persons, whether natural or
juridical, through premeditated,
threatened, or actual use of violence,
force, coercion, intimidation, or any other
means of destruction perpetrated against
person/s, property/ies, environment or
the government, with the intention of
creating or sowing a state of danger,
panic, fear or chaos to the general public
or a segment thereof by any of the
following acts:
1. Causing or threatening to causedeath or serious physical ormental harm to a person or
group of persons;
2. Depriving or threatening todeprive any person of his/her
liberty;
3. Assassinating or kidnapping theofficials within the constitutional
line of succession, or any
internationally protected person
in violation of the Convention on
the Protection and Punishment
of Crimes Against Internationally
Protected Persons, includingDiplomatic Agents, and other
international agreements;
4. Causing or threatening to causesubstantial damage or wanton
destruction or resorting to arson
on critical infrastructure or any
property, public or private;
5. Causing or threatening to causesubstantial damage or wanton
destruction or resorting to arson
on critical infrastructure or any
property, public or private;6. Causing or threatening to cause
serious interference with or
serious disruption of an essential
service, facility or system,
whether public or private, other
than a result of lawful advocacy,
protest, dissent or stoppage of
work;
7. Attacking or threatening toattack the cyberspace, by
destroying the actual machinery
SEC. 3. Terrorism.- Any person who
commits an act punishable under any of
the following provisions of the Revised
Penal Code:
a. Article 122 (Piracy in General
and Mutiny in the High Seas or in
the Philippine Waters);
b. Article 134 (Rebellion or
Insurrection);
c. Article 134-a (Coup d' Etat),
including acts committed by
private persons;
d. Article 248 (Murder);
e. Article 267 (Kidnapping and
Serious Illegal Detention);
f. Article 324 (Crimes Involving
Destruction), or under
1. Presidential Decree No.
1613 (The Law on Arson);
2. Republic Act No. 6969
(Toxic Substances and
Hazardous and Nuclear
Waste Control Act of
1990);
3. Republic Act No. 5207,
(Atomic Energy
Regulatory and Liability
Act of 1968);
4. Republic Act No. 6235
(Anti-Hijacking Law);
5. Presidential Decree No.
532 (Anti-Piracy and Anti-
Highway Robbery Law of
1974); and,
6. Presidential Decree No.
1866, as amended
(Decree Codifying the
Laws on Illegal and
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
2/16
2
of the information and
communication infrastructure,
disrupting the information
technology underlying the
internet, government or private
computer networks or systems,
or committing any unlawful act
against information andcommunication systems;
8. Hijacking or threatening to hijackany kind of aircraft, electric or
railroad train, passenger bus or
other means of mass
transportation, or public
conveyance, or piracy of ship or
sea vessel;
9. Willfully destroying theenvironment including the
natural resources in land, water
or air, such as forests or marineand mineral resources, or
intentionally causing oil or toxic
spillages, or other similar acts of
destruction against the
environment that threatens
ecological security, or natural
cultural property;
10. Manufacturing, processing,selling, acquiring, possessing,
using, diverting, supplying or
transporting chemical, biological,
radiological or nuclear agents, or
equipment and instruments usedin their production, distribution,
release or spread that would
endanger directly or indirectly
the safety of one or more
individuals, or to cause mass
destruction or great damage to
property; or
11. Manufacturing, selling, acquiringsupplying, disposing, using or
possessing explosives, bombs,
grenades, projectiles, devices, or
other lethal weapons, orsubstances or machinery used or
intended to be used for the
manufacture of explosives in
furtherance of, or incident to, or
in connection with, an act of
terrorism defined herein.
Any person who commits any act of
terrorism shall suffer the penalty of life
imprisonment and a fine of ten million
pesos (Php 10,000,000.00): Provided, that,
Unlawful Possession,
Manufacture, Dealing in,
Acquisition or Disposition
of Firearms, Ammunitions
or Explosives)
thereby sowing and creating a condition of
widespread and extraordinary fear and
panic among the populace, in order to
coerce the government to give in to an
unlawful demand shall be guilty of the
crime of terrorism and shall suffer the
penalty of forty (40) years of imprisonment
without the benefit of parole as provided
for under Act No. 4103, otherwise known
as the Indeterminate Sentence Law, as
amended.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
3/16
3
Sec. 7.Acts that Facilitate, Contribute to
or Promote Terrorism. It shall be
unlawful for any person or group of
persons, whether natural or juridical, to
knowingly, willfully and voluntarily
facilitate, contribute to or promote
terrorism through any of the following
acts:
(1) Establishing, maintaining orserving as contact or link with
any person or group of persons
or organization/s as proscribed
pursuant to Section 8 of this Act
who have pursued or are
pursuing terrorism;
(2) Arranging or assisting in theconduct of meeting of two or
more persons, knowing that the
meeting is to support or is in
furtherance of terrorism;(3) Participating in training and
providing training facilities to
any person or group of persons,
organizations to carry out
terrorism;
(4) Providing or offering to providetraining, skill or expertise in
furtherance of terrorism;
(5) Recruiting in order to facilitateor commit terrorism;
(6) Facilitating the entry or stay inthe Philippines of aliens,knowing that the aliens have
pursued or are pursuing
terrorism;
(7) Facilitating, providing, solicitingor encouraging financial or
material support regardless of
its source for the commission of
terrorism; or
(8) Harboring or concealing anyperson whom he knows or has
reasonable ground to believe,
if an act of terrorism should result in the
death of a person, or if committed with
the use of uniform, paraphernalia,
communication equipment, or other
implements peculiar to the armed forces
or other law enforcement agencies, or if
the offender is a government official or
employee or has retired, resigned,dismissed or otherwise separated from
the government service, the penalty of
death shall be imposed.
Sec. 4. Acts that Facilitate, Contribute to
or Promote Terrorism.It shall be
unlawful for any person or group of
persons, whether natural or juridical, to
knowingly, willfully and voluntarily
facilitate, contribute to or promote
terrorism through any of the following
acts:
1. Establishing, maintaining orserving as contact or link with
any person or group of persons
or organization/s who have
pursued or are pursuing
terrorism;
2. Arranging or assisting in theconduct of meeting of two (2) or
more persons, knowing that the
meeting is to support or is in
furtherance of terrorism;
3. Participating in training andproviding training facilities to any
person or group of persons,
organizations to carry out
terrorism;
4. Providing or offering to providetraining, skill or expertise in
furtherance of terrorism;
5. Recruiting in order to facilitate orcommit terrorism;
6. Facilitating the entry or stay inthe Philippines of aliens, knowing
that the aliens have pursued orare pursuing terrorism;
7. Facilitating, providing,maintaining, soliciting or
encouraging financial or material
support for the commission of
terrorism; or
8. Harboring or concealing anyperson whom he knows or has
reasonable ground to believe, to
be the person who carried out
any act stated in this Section or
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
4/16
4
to be the person who carried
out any act stated in this
Section or who committed or is
likely to commit any act of
terrorism.
Any person who commits any of the acts
stated in this Section shall suffer thepenalty of life imprisonment and a fine
of Two Million Five Hundred Thousand
Pesos (P2,500,000.00): Provided, That if
such act was committed with the use of
firearms or ammunition, or uniform,
paraphernalia, communication
equipment, or other implements
peculiar to the armed forces or other
law enforcement agencies, or if the
offender is a public officer or employee,
the penalty of life imprisonment and a
fine of Five Million Pesos (Php5,000,000.00) shall be imposed.
who committed or is likely to
commit any act of terrorism.
Any person who commits any of the acts
stated in this Section shall suffer the
penalty of life imprisonment and a fine of
ten million pesos (Php 10,000,000.00):
Provided, that, if the act should result inthe death of a person, or if such act was
committed with the use of firearms or
ammunition, or uniform, paraphernalia,
communication equipment, or other
implements peculiar to the armed forces
or other law enforcement agencies, or if
the offender is a public officer or
employee, the death penalty shall be
imposed.
Sec. 6. Conspiracy and Proposal to
Commit Terrorism.There is a
conspiracy to commit terrorism when
two or more persons come to an
agreement to commit any act of
terrorism as defined herein and decide
to commit it.
There is proposal to commit terrorism
when any person who has decided to
commit any act of terrorism as defined
herein proposes its execution to someother person or persons.
The conspiracy and proposal to commit
any act of terrorism shall be punished by
imprisonment of not less than six years
and one day but not more than twelve
(12) years and a fine of One million
pesos (P1,000,000.00): Provided, That, if
the offender is a government official or
employee who used or abused his office
in the commission of a terrorist act, the
maximum penalty and the accessorypenalty of perpetual absolute
disqualification to hold public office shall
be imposed.
Sec.6. Conspiracy or Proposal to Commit
Terrorism.There is a conspiracy to
commit terrorism when two or more
persons come to an agreement to commit
any act of terrorism as defined herein and
decide to commit it.
There is proposal to commit terrorism
when any person who has decided to
commit any act of terrorism as defined
herein proposes its execution to some
other person or persons.
Any person who conspires to commit any
act of terrorism shall be punished by
imprisonment of not less than ten (10)
years to fifteen (15) years and a fine of
five million pesos (Php 5,000,000.00).
Any person who proposes the commission
of any act of terrorism shall be punished
by imprisonment of not less than six (6)
years and one (1) day but not more than
ten (10) years and a fine of three millionpesos (Php 3,000,000.00).
Provided, That if the offender is a
government official or employee or has
retired, resigned, dismissed or otherwise
separated from the government service,
the maximum penalty and the accessory
penalty of perpetual disqualification to
hold public office shall be imposed.
SEC. 4. Conspiracy to Commit Terrorism.-
Persons who conspire to commit the crime
of terrorism shall suffer the penalty of forty
(40) years of imprisonment.
There is conspiracy when two or more
persons come to an agreement concerning
the commission of the crime of terrorism as
defined in Section 3 hereof and decide to
commit the same.
SEC. 19. Communication Assistance for
Law Enforcement Agencies.
SEC. 16. Communications Assistance for
Law Enforcement Agencies. -
SEC. 7. Surveillance of Suspects and
Interception and Recording of
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
5/16
5
(a) The provisions of Republic Act No.
4200, otherwise known as the Anti-
Wire Tapping Act to the contrary
notwithstanding, any peace officer may
apply ex parte before the executive
judge of any Regional Trial Court for
an order, or extension of such an
order, requiring a provider of wire orelectronic communication service to
provide intercepted communication
and call identifying information to law
enforcement agencies, or authorizing
or approving the installation, use
and/or retrieval of surveillance device,
in connection with an investigation for
any offense punishable under this Act.
(b) When a peace officer has certified
that there is probable cause to believe
that the information likely to beobtained by such interception,
installation or use is material to an
ongoing investigation for any offense
punishable under this Act and there
are no other means readily available
for obtaining such information, the
court shall issue an ex parte order
requiring a
provider of wire or electronic
communication service or authorizing
the installation, use and/or retrieval
such device, for a period not to
exceed sixty (60) days. An extensionof such an order may be granted:
Provided, That such extension shall not
exceed sixty (60) days.
Such order shall state one or more of the
following:
(1) The premises to be subjected tosurveillance;
(2) The use of surveillance devicein or on a specified object or
class of object;
(3)
The use of surveillance devicewith respect to the
conversations, activities, or
location of a specified person
or a person whose identity is
unknown;
(4) The order be sealed untilotherwise ordered by the court;
(5) The person using the line towhich the device is to be
attached, or the company has
been ordered by the court to
1. The provisions of Republic Act No.
4200, otherwise known as the Anti-Wire
Tapping Act to the contrary
notwithstanding, any peace officer may
apply ex parte before the executive judge
of any Regional Trial Court for an order,
extension of such an order, requiring a
provider of wire or electroniccommunication service to provide
intercepted communication and call
identifying information to law
enforcement agencies, or authorizing or
approving the installation, use and/or
retrieval of surveillance device, in
connection with an investigation for any
offense punishable under this Act.
2. For purposes of this Act, a surveillance
device shall include but not be limited to
the following:a. Data surveillance device orprogram capable of being used to
record or monitor the input of
information into, or the output
of information from the
computer;
b. Listening device capable of beingused to overhear, record,
monitor or listen to a
conversation or words spoken to
or by any person in
conversation, but does not
include a hearing aid or similardevice used by a person with
impaired hearing to overcome
the impairment and permit that
person to hear only sounds
ordinarily audible to the human
ear;
c. Optical surveillance devicecapable of being used to record
visually or observe an activity,
but does not include spectacles,
contact lenses, or similar device
used by a person with impairedsight to overcome the
impairment;
d. Electronic tracking devicecapable of being used to
determine or monitor the
location of a person or an object
or the status of an object;
e. Pen register capable of recordingor decoding electronic or other
impulses which identified the
numbers dialed or otherwise
Communications.-The provisions of
Republic Act No. 4200 (Anti-Wire Tapping
Law) to the contrary notwithstanding, a
police or law enforcement official and the
members of his team may, upon a written
order of the Court of Appeals, listen to,
intercept and record, with the use of any
mode, form, kind or type of electronic orother surveillance equipment or
intercepting and tracking devices, or with
the use of any other suitable ways and
means for that purpose, any
communication, message, conversation,
discussion, or spoken or written words
between members of a judicially declared
and outlawed terrorist organization,
association, or group of persons or of any
person charged with or suspected of the
crime of terrorism or conspiracy to commit
terrorism.
Provided, That surveillance, interception
and recording of communications between
lawyers and clients, doctors and patients,
journalists and their sources and
confidential business correspondence shall
not be authorized.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
6/16
6
provide assistance to the
applicant, not to disclose the
existence of the device or
the existence of the
investigation to the listed
subscriber, or to any other
person, unless or until
otherwise ordered by the court;(6) The provider of wire or
electronic communication
service to provide intercepted
communication and call
identifying information to the
peace officer; or
(7) The entry into the premises,and into other specified
premises adjoining or providing
access to the premises, in order
to install or retrieve the
surveillance device.
(c) A provider of wire or electronic
communication service, landlord,
custodian, or other person shall install
or assist in the installation of such
device forthwith on the appropriate
line and furnish such peace officer
forthwith all information, facilities and
technical assistance necessary to
accomplish the installation, use and/or
retrieval of the device unobtrusively and
with a minimum of interference with
the services that the person so orderedby the court, accord the party with
respect to whom the installation, use
and/or retrieval is to take place, if such
assistance is directed by a court order.
(d) Unless otherwise ordered by the
court, the information obtained by the
device shall be furnished to the peace
officer designated in the court order, at
reasonable intervals during regular
business hours for the duration of
theorder.
(e) Any person who discloses or
causes the publication of information
obtained, gathered or acquired
pursuant to this Section, for the
purpose other than that for which it
was authorized, shall suffer the
penalty of imprisonment of not less
than six months and one day to not
more than six years: Provided,
transmitted on the telephone
line to which such device is
attached, but such term does not
include any device used by a
provider or customer of a wire or
electronic communication service
for billing, or recording as an
incident to billing, forcommunication services
provided by such provider or any
device used by a provider or
customer of a wire
communication service for cost
accounting or other like purposes
in the ordinary course of its
business;
f. Trap and trace device capable ofcapturing the incoming electronic
or other impulses which identify
the originating number of aninstrument or device from which
a wire or electronic
communication was transmitted;
or
g. A device that is a combination ofany two or more of the devices
referred to in paragraph (1) to (6)
of this Section.
3. When the peace officer has certified
that the information likely to be
obtained by such interception, installation
or use is relevant to an ongoinginvestigation for any offense punishable
under this Act, the court shall issue an
ex parte order requiring a provider of
wire or electronic communication service
or authorizing the installation, use and/or
retrieval of the devices applied for, for a
period not to exceed sixty (60) days.
Such order shall state one or more of the
following
a. the permission to be subjected tosurveillance;
b.
the use of surveillance device inor on a specified object or class
of object;
c. the use of surveillance devicewith respect to the
conversations, activities, or
location of a specified person or
a person whose identity is
unknown;
d. the order be sealed untilotherwise ordered by the court;
e. the person using the line to
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
7/16
7
That, if the offender is a government
official or employee who used or
abused his office in the commission of
a terrorist act, the maximum penalty
and the accessory penalty of perpetual
absolute disqualification to hold public
office
shall be imposed: Provided, further,That the print or broadcast entity that
knowingly publishes or airs wiretapped
material herein above obtained shall be
fined the amount of Two Million Five
Hundred Thousand Pesos
(Php2,500,000.00); the responsible
reporter, writer, president, publisher,
manager and editor-in-chief shall
suffer the penalty of imprisonment as
provided under this subsection (e).
(f) A court order shall not be requiredto authorize the installation, use or
retrieval of surveillance device in any
case where a peace officer, in
connection with an investigation for
any offense punishable under this
Act, obtains the written consent of a
party to the communication to be
monitored or recorded in connection
with any offense punishable under this
Act.
(g) No cause of action shall lie in any
court against any provider of a wireor electronic communication service,
its officers, employees, agents, or
other specified persons for providing
information, facilities, or assistance in
accordance with the terms of a court
order under this Act. A good faith
reliance on a court order under this Act
is a complete defense against any civil or
criminal action brought under this Act or
any other law.
(h) Any communication, written orspoken word, conversation, discussion,
information, photos, or data taken,
obtained or acquired in violation of
this Section shall not be admissible as
evidence in any judicial, quasi-judicial,
legislative or administrative hearing or
investigation.
(i) Any person who hinders, obstructs
or otherwise prevents the peace
officer from performing his duties stated
which the device is to be
attached, or the company who
has been ordered by the court to
provide assistance to the
applicant, not to disclose the
existence of the device or the
existence of the investigation to
the listed subscriber, or to anyother person, unless or until
otherwise ordered by the court;
f. the provider of wire or electroniccommunication service to
provide intercepted
communication and call
identifying information to the
peace officer; or
g. the entry into the premises, andinto other specified premises
adjoining or providing access to
the premises, in order to installor retrieve the surveillance
device.
4. A provider of wire or electronic
communication service, landlord,
custodian, or other person shall install or
assist in the installation of such device
forthwith on the appropriate line and
furnish such peace officer forthwith all
information, facilities, and technical
assistance necessary to accomplish the
installation, use and/or retrieval of the
device unobtrusively and with a minimumof interference with the services that the
person so order by the court, accord the
party with respect to whom the
installation, use and/or retrieval is to take
place, if such assistance is directed by a
court order.
5. Unless otherwise ordered by the court,
the information obtained by the device
shall be furnished to the peace officer
designated in the court order, at
reasonable intervals during regularbusiness hours for the duration of
the order.
6. Any person who discloses information
obtained, gathered or acquired pursuant
to this Section, for the purpose other than
that for which it was authorized, shall
suffer the penalty of imprisonment of not
less than six (6) months and one (1) day to
not more than six (6) years: Provided that,
if the offender is a government official or
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
8/16
8
in this Section shall suffer the penalty of
imprisonment of not less than six
months and one day to not more
than six years: Provided, That, if the
offender is a government official or
employee used or abused his office in
the commission of a terrorist act, the
maximum penalty and the accessorypenalty of perpetual absolute
disqualification to hold public office shall
be imposed.
employee or has retired, resigned,
dismissed or otherwise separated from
the government service, the maximum
penalty and the accessory penalty of
perpetual disqualification to hold public
office shall be imposed.
7. A court order shall not be required toauthorize the installation, use or retrieval
of surveillance device in any case where a
peace officer, in connection with an
investigation for any offence punishable
under this Act, obtains the written
consent of a party to the communication
to be monitored or recorded in
connection with any offense punishable
under this Act.
8. No cause of action shall lie in any court
against any provider of a wire orelectronic communication service, its
officers, employees, agents, or other
specified persons providing information,
facilities, or assistance in accordance with
the terms of a court order under this Act.
A good faith reliance on a court order
under this Act is a complete defense
against any civil or criminal action brought
under this Act or any other law.
9. Any communication, written or spoken
word, conversation, discussion,
information, photos, or data taken,obtained or acquired in violation of this
Section shall not be admissible as
evidence in any judicial, quasi-judicial,
legislative or administrative hearing or
investigation.
10. Any person who hinders, obstructs or
otherwise prevents the peace officer from
performing his duties in Section 21 of
this Act shall suffer the penalty of
imprisonment of not less than six (6)
months and one (1) day to not more thansix (6) years: Provided, that, if the
offender is a government official or
employee or has retired, resigned,
dismissed or otherwise separated from
the government service, the maximum
penalty and the accessory penalty of
perpetual disqualification to hold public
office shall be imposed.
Sec. 8. Proscription of Organization. For
the purpose of this Act, an organization
may be proscribed as a terrorist
Sec. 8. Proscription of an Organization.
For the purpose of this Act and with the
observance of due process, the Anti
SEC. 17. Proscription of Terrorist
Organizations, Association, or Group of
Persons.- Any organization, association, or
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
9/16
9
organization, upon petition by the
Secretary of Justice based on the
recommendation of an absolute
majority of all members of the Anti-
Terrorism Council created by this Act,
with the appropriate Regional Trial
Courts, observing due process, if such
organization is characterized by any ofthe following:
1) The leadership andmembership of the subject
organization by overt acts
publicly and openly endorse,
proclaim, campaign and/or
adhere to the commission of
acts of terrorism proscribed and
punished in this Act; and
2) When more than threemembers of the subjectorganization openly and
publicly declare, admit and
acknowledge to have
committed any of the acts
punishable under this act or any
of the acts of terrorism as
defined and described in
Sections 4, 6, and 7 of this act,
with the prior knowledge,
consent and/or encouragement
by the leadership of the
organization and/or subsequent
concurrence or condonation bythe leadership of the
organization.
Proscriptions shall be published in the
government gazette and major
newspapers.
Any proscribed organization or member
thereof may move for de-proscription or
de-listing before the Department of
Justice (DOJ), whose decision is
appealable to the Court of Appeals.
Sec. 9. Membership in a Terrorist
Organization. A proscribed organization
shall automatically be de-established
and the following acts shall be unlawful:
(1) Any person who shall continueto lead the proscribed
organization and any member
who shall continue his
affiliation in said organization;
Terrorism Council, upon its own initiative,
or upon recommendation of the Secretary
of Justice may proscribe a group as a
terrorist organization if such organization
is characterized by any of the following:
1. Any member or membersthereof openly and publicly
declares, admits, acknowledged,to have committed any of the
acts punishable under this Act;
2. Any member or membersthereof have been convicted for
the commission of any act of
terrorism as defined and
described in Sections 3, 4 and 5
of this Act;
3. It is proscribed by the UnitedNations or international
organizations.
Proscriptions shall be published in the
government gazette and major
newspapers.
Any proscribed organization or member
thereof may move for de-proscription or
de-listing before the Department of
Justice (DOJ), whose decision is
appealable to the Court of Appeals.
Sec. 9. Membership in a Terrorist
Organization. Where an organization
has been proscribes as a terrorist
organization, it shall be unlawful for any
person who knowingly, willfully, and by
overt acts, affiliates himself, becomes, or
remains a member of such activities
unless he can prove a lack of personal
knowledge of the organizations activities;
or that he has taken any part in the
activities of the organization at any time
group of persons organized for the purpose
of engaging in terrorism, or which,
although not organized for that purpose,
actually uses the acts to terrorize
mentioned in this Act or to sow and create
a condition of widespread and
extraordinary fear and panic among the
populace in order to coerce thegovernment to give in to an unlawful
demand shall, upon application of the
Department of Justice before a competent
Regional Trial Court, with due notice and
opportunity to be heard given to the
organization, association, or group of
persons concerned, be declared as a
terrorist and outlawed organization,
association, or group of persons by the said
Regional Trial Court.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
10/16
10
(2) Any person who shall become amember of said organization
after its proscription had been
published;
(3) Any person who shall revivesaid organization prior to its
having been de-proscribed.
Any person convicted under this
Section shall suffer the penalty of
imprisonment from not less than six
years and one day to not more than
twelve (12) years: Provided, That, if
the offender is a government official
or employee who used or abused
his office in the commission of a
terrorist act, the maximum penalty
and the accessory penalty of
perpetual absolute disqualification
to hold public office shall beimposed.
while it was proscribed; or that he took
immediate steps to terminate his
membership therefrom as soon as
practicable after it was proscribed; or that
the organization was not declared a
terrorist organization at the time he
became a member or begun to profess to
be a member.
Any person convicted under this Section
shall suffer the penalty for imprisonment
of not less than six (6) years and one (1)
day to not more than twelve (12) years.
Provided that, if the offender is a
government official or employee, or has
retied, resigned, dismissed or otherwise
separated from the government service,
the maximum penalty and the accessory
penalty of perpetual disqualification to
hold public office shall be imposed.
Sec. 14.Arrest and Detention. Any
peace officer or a private person may,
without warrant, arrest a person: (a)
when, in his presence, the person to be
arrested has committed, is actually
committing, or attempting to commit
any of the offense under this Act; or (b)
when any of said offense has just been
committed and he has probable cause to
believe based on personal knowledge of
facts or circumstances that the person to
be arrested has committed it.
Any person arrested under this Section
may be detained for a period of not
more than three days following his
arrest for custodial investigation. The
period of detention may be detained for
a period of not more than three days
following his arrest for custodial
investigation.
The period of detention may be
extended beyond three days if theperson arrested without a warrant
demands for a preliminary investigation
and consents to it in writing and in the
presence of his or her counsel. He shall
be entitled to all other rights under
Republic Act No. 7438, otherwise known
as An Act Defining Certain Rights of
Persons Arrested, Detained, or Under
Custodial Investigation.
Sec. 10. Arrest and Detention. Any
person arrested for violation of this Act,
pursuant to Rule 113, Section 5,
paragraphs (a) and (b) of the Rules of
Court, may be detained for an inquest
period of not more than three (3)
following his/her arrest.
The period of detention may be extended
beyond three (3) days if the person
arrested without a warrant demands for a
preliminary investigation and consents toit in writing and in the presence of his or
her counsel. He/she shall be entitled to all
the rights under Republic Act No. 7438,
otherwise known as An Act Defining
Certain Rights of Persons Arrested,
Detained, or Under Custodial
Investigation.
SEC. 18. Period of Detention Without
Judicial Warrant of Arrest.- The provisions
of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code to
the contrary notwithstanding, any police or
law enforcement personnel, who, having
been duly authorized in writing by the Anti-
Terrorism Council has taken custody of a
person charged with or suspected of the
crime of terrorism or the crime of
conspiracy to commit terrorism shall,
without incurring any criminal liability for
delay in the delivery of detained persons tothe proper judicial authorities, deliver said
charged or suspected person to the proper
judicial authority within a period of three
days counted from the moment the said
charged or suspected person has been
apprehended or arrested, detained, and
taken into custody by the said police, or law
enforcement personnel: Provided, That the
arrest of those suspected of the crime of
terrorism or conspiracy to commit
terrorism must result from the surveillance
under Section 7 and examination of bankdeposits under Section 27 of this Act.
The police or law enforcement personnel
concerned shall, before detaining the
person suspected of the crime of terrorism,
present him or her before any judge at the
latter's residence or office nearest the
place where the arrest took place at any
time of the day or night. It shall be the duty
of the judge, among other things, to
ascertain the identity of the police or law
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
11/16
11
enforcement personnel and the person or
persons they have arrested and presented
before him or her, to inquire of them the
reasons why they have arrested the person
and determine by questioning and persona
observation whether or not the suspect has
been subjected to any physical, moral or
psychological torture by whom and why.The judge shall then submit a written
report of what he/she had observed when
the subject was brought before him to the
proper court that has jurisdiction over the
case of the person thus arrested. The judge
shall forthwith submit his/her report within
three calendar days from the time the
suspect was brought to his/her residence
or office.
Immediately after taking custody of a
person charged with or suspected of thecrime of terrorism or conspiracy to commit
terrorism, the police or law enforcement
personnel shall notify in writing the judge
of the court nearest the place of
apprehension or arrest: Provided ,That
where the arrest is made during Saturdays,
Sundays, holidays or after office hours, the
written notice shall be served at the
residence of the judge nearest the place
where the accused was arrested.
The penalty of ten (10) years and one day
to twelve (12) years of imprisonment shall
be imposed upon the police or law
enforcement personnel who fails to notify
and judge as Provided in the preceding
paragraph.
Sec. 18.Applicability of Republic Act No.
9160, as Amended by Republic Act No.
9194. Terrorism and other violations of
this Act shall be considered unlawful
activities under Republic Act No. 9160,
otherwise known as the Anti-Money
Laundering Act of 2001, as amended.
Upon determination that a probable
cause exists to suspect that any
monetary instrument or property is in
any way related to or in the furtherance
of terrorism and other violations under
this Act, the Anti-Money Laundering
Council (AMLC) may issue a freeze order,
which shall be effective immediately, on
the said monetary instrument/s and/or
properties for a period not exceeding
ninety (90) days unless extended by the
SEC. 15. Applicability of Republic Act No.
9160, as amended by Republic Act No.
9194.- Any act of terrorism and other
violations as punished under this Act shall
be considered unlawful activities under
Republic Act No. 9160, otherwise known
as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of
2001, as amended by Republic Act No.9194.
Upon determination that reasonable
ground to suspect exists that any
monetary instrument or property is in any
way related to terrorism and other
violation under this Act, the Anti-Money
Laundering Council (AMLC) may issue a
freeze order, which shall be effective
immediately, on the said monetary
instrument/s and/or properties for a
SEC. 27.Judicial Authorization Required to
Examine Bank Deposits, Accounts, and
Records.- The provisions of Republic Act
No. 1405 as amended, to the contrary
notwithstanding, the justices of the Court
of Appeals designated as a special court to
handle anti-terrorism cases after satisfying
themselves of the existence of probablecause in a hearing called for that purpose
that: (1) a person charged with or
suspected of the crime of terrorism or,
conspiracy to commit terrorism, (2) of a
judicially declared and outlawed terrorist
organization, association, or group of
persons; and (3) of a member of such
judicially declared and outlawed
organization, association, or group of
persons, may authorize in writing any
police or law enforcement officer and the
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
12/16
12
Court of Appeals. Notice to the
purported owner/s that his/their
monetary instruments and/or property
has/have been frozen shall be issued
simultaneously with the issuance of the
freeze order. The purported owner/s of
the monetary instrument/s and/or
property has/have been frozen shall beissued simultaneously with the issuance
of the freeze order. The purported
owner/s of the monetary instrument/s
and/or property shall have three
working days upon receipt of the notice
to explain why the freeze order should
be lifted. The AMLC has three working
days to resolve the freeze order case
from receipt of the purported owner/s
explanation. If the AMLC fails to act
within three working days from the
receipt of the said purported ownersexplanation, the freeze order shall
automatically be dissolved.
A freeze order shall stop all movements
or transactions of or involving the
monetary instrument/s and property. In
cases where checks drawn against a
bank account subject of a freeze order
were issued within fifteen (15) days prior
to the issuance of the freeze order, the
freeze order shall likewise result in the
automatic cancellation and stop
payment thereof. All movements ortransactions, irrespective of the amount
involved, occurring within the same
period shall be reported to the AMLC:
Provided, That deposits or investments
with any banking institutions or non-
bank financial institutions may be
inquired into or examined by the AMLC
without prior court order pursuant to
Republic Act No. 9160, as amended,
when it is first established by the AMLC
that there is probable cause that the
deposits or investments involved are inany way related to terrorism and other
violations under this Act: Provided,
further, That any person from a covered
institution knowing that any money,
instrument, or property or its proceeds,
represents, involves, or relates to
terrorism or the furtherance thereof and
fails to report the same as suspicious
transaction to the AMLC shall be
criminally liable pursuant to Section 13
of this Act.
period not exceeding ninety (90) days
unless extended by the Court of Appeals.
Notice to the purported owner/s that
his/their monetary instrument/s and/or
properties has/have been
frozen shall be issued simultaneously with
the issuance of the freeze order. The
purported owner/s of the monetaryinstrument/s and/or property shall have
three (3) working days upon receipt of the
notice to explain why the freeze order
should be lifted. The AMLC has three (3)
working days to resolve the freeze order
case from receipt of the purported
owner/s explanation.
A freeze order shall stop all movements
or transactions of or involving the
monetary instrument/s and property. In
cases where checks drawn against a bankaccount subject of a freeze order were
issued within fifteen (15) days prior to the
issuance of the freeze order, the freeze
order shall likewise result in the automatic
cancellation and stop payment thereof. All
movements or transactions, irrespective
of the amount involved, occurring within
the same period shall be reported to the
AMLC.
Provided, that deposits or investments
with any banking institutions or non-bank
financial institutions may be inquired intoor examined without prior court order
pursuant to Republic Act No. 9160, as
amended: Provided, further, that any
person of covered institution knowing
that any money, instrument, or property
or its proceeds, represents, involves, or
relates to terrorism or the furtherance
thereof and fails to report the same as
suspicious transactions to the AMLC shall
be criminally liable pursuant to Section 14
of this Act.
members of his/her team duly authorized
in writing by the anti-terrorism council to:
(a) examine, or cause the examination of,
the deposits, placements, trust accounts,
assets and records in a bank or financial
institution; and (b) gather or cause the
gathering of any relevant information
about such deposits, placements, trustaccounts, assets, and records from a bank
or financial institution. The bank or
financial institution concerned, shall not
refuse to allow such examination or to
provide the desired information, when so,
ordered by and served with the written
order of the Court of Appeals.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
13/16
13
SEC. 20. Seizure of Vehicle, Vessel,
Aircraft, Equipment, or Other Property or
Instrument. Any vehicle, vessel,
aircraft, equipment, or other property or
instrument used in furtherance of, or
incidental to, or in connection with any
act of terrorism as defined in this Act
shall be presumedprima facieevidenceto have been unlawfully used in
furtherance of or incident to or in
connection with any act of terrorism as
defined in this Act, and shall carry with it
the confiscation and forfeiture thereof in
favor of the government, including, but
not limited to, all the proceeds of the
crime, such as money and other assets
obtained thereby and instruments or
tools with which it was committed
unless these are properties of a third
person not liable for the offense andwho does not knowingly authorize,
tolerate or consent the use of the same.
Sec. 18.Applicability of Republic Act No.
9160, as Amended by Republic Act No.
9194. Terrorism and other violations of
this Act shall be considered unlawful
activities under Republic Act No. 9160,
otherwise known as the Anti-Money
Laundering Act of 2001, as amended.
Upon determination that a probablecause exists to suspect that any
monetary instrument or property is in
any way related to or in the furtherance
of terrorism and other violations under
this Act, the Anti-Money Laundering
Council (AMLC) may issue a freeze order,
which shall be effective immediately, on
the said monetary instrument/s and/or
properties for a period not exceeding
ninety (90) days unless extended by the
Court of Appeals. Notice to the
purported owner/s that his/theirmonetary instruments and/or property
has/have been frozen shall be issued
simultaneously with the issuance of the
freeze order. The purported owner/s of
the monetary instrument/s and/or
property has/have been frozen shall be
issued simultaneously with the issuance
of the freeze order. The purported
owner/s of the monetary instrument/s
and/or property shall have three
working days upon receipt of the notice
SEC. 17. Seizure of Vehicle, Vessel,
Aircraft, Equipment, or Other Property or
Instrument.Any vehicle, vessel, aircraft,
equipment or other property or
instrument used in furtherance of, or
incident to, or in connection with, any act
of terrorism as defined in this Act shall be
presumedprima facie evidence to havebeen unlawfully used in furtherance of or
incident to or in connection with any act
of terrorism as provided in this Act, and
shall carry with it the confiscation and
forfeiture of thereof, in favor of the
government, including but not limited to
all the proceeds of the crime, such as
money and other assets obtained thereby
and the instruments or tools with which it
was committed unless they are property
of third person not liable for the offense
and who does not knowingly authorize,tolerate or consent the use of the same.
SEC. 15. Applicability of Republic Act No.
9160, as amended by Republic Act No.
9194.- Any act of terrorism and other
violations as punished under this Act shall
be considered unlawful activities under
Republic Act No. 9160, otherwise known
as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of
2001, as amended by Republic Act No.
9194.
Upon determination that reasonableground to suspect exists that any
monetary instrument or property is in any
way related to terrorism and other
violation under this Act, the Anti-Money
Laundering Council (AMLC) may issue a
freeze order, which shall be effective
immediately, on the said monetary
instrument/s and/or properties for a
period not exceeding ninety (90) days
unless extended by the Court of Appeals.
Notice to the purported owner/s that
his/their monetary instrument/s and/orproperties has/have been
frozen shall be issued simultaneously with
the issuance of the freeze order. The
purported owner/s of the monetary
instrument/s and/or property shall have
three (3) working days upon receipt of the
notice to explain why the freeze order
should be lifted. The AMLC has three (3)
working days to resolve the freeze order
case from receipt of the purported
owner/s explanation.
SEC. 39. Seizure and Sequestration.- The
deposits and their outstanding balances,
placements, trust accounts, assets, and
records in any bank or financial institution,
moneys, businesses, transportation and
communication equipment, supplies and
other implements, and property of
whatever kind and nature belonging: (1) toany person suspected of or charged before
a competent Regional Trial Court for the
crime of terrorism or the crime of
conspiracy to commit terrorism; (2) to a
judicially declared and outlawed
organization, association, or group of
persons; or (3) to a member of such
organization, association, or group of
persons shall be seized, sequestered, and
frozen in order to prevent their use,
transfer, or conveyance for purposes that
are inimical to the safety and security ofthe people or injurious to the interest of
the State.
The accused or a person suspected of may
withdraw such sums as may be reasonably
needed by the monthly needs of his family
including the services of his or her counsel
and his or her family's medical needs upon
approval of the court. He or she may also
use any of his property that is under seizure
or sequestration or frozen because of
his/her indictment as a terrorist upon
permission of the court for any legitimate
reason.
Any person who unjustifiably refuses to
follow the order of the proper division of
the Court of Appeals to allow the person
accused of the crime of terrorism or of the
crime of conspiracy to commit terrorism to
withdraw such sums from sequestered or
frozen deposits, placements, trust
accounts, assets and records as may be
necessary for the regular sustenance of
his/her family or to use any of his/herproperty that has been seized, sequestered
or frozen for legitimate purposes while
his/her case is pending shall suffer the
penalty of ten (10) years and one day to
twelve (12) years of imprisonment.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
14/16
14
to explain why the freeze order should
be lifted. The AMLC has three working
days to resolve the freeze order case
from receipt of the purported owner/s
explanation. If the AMLC fails to act
within three working days from the
receipt of the said purported owners
explanation, the freeze order shallautomatically be dissolved.
A freeze order shall stop all movements
or transactions of or involving the
monetary instrument/s and property. In
cases where checks drawn against a
bank account subject of a freeze order
were issued within fifteen (15) days prior
to the issuance of the freeze order, the
freeze order shall likewise result in the
automatic cancellation and stop
payment thereof. All movements ortransactions, irrespective of the amount
involved, occurring within the same
period shall be reported to the AMLC:
Provided, That deposits or investments
with any banking institutions or non-
bank financial institutions may be
inquired into or examined by the AMLC
without prior court order pursuant to
Republic Act No. 9160, as amended,
when it is first established by the AMLC
that there is probable cause that the
deposits or investments involved are in
any way related to terrorism and otherviolations under this Act: Provided,
further, That any person from a covered
institution knowing that any money,
instrument, or property or its proceeds,
represents, involves, or relates to
terrorism or the furtherance thereof and
fails to report the same as suspicious
transaction to the AMLC shall be
criminally liable pursuant to Section 13
of this Act.
A freeze order shall stop all movements
or transactions of or involving the
monetary instrument/s and property. In
cases where checks drawn against a bank
account subject of a freeze order were
issued within fifteen (15) days prior to the
issuance of the freeze order, the freezeorder shall likewise result in the automatic
cancellation and stop payment thereof. All
movements or transactions, irrespective
of the amount involved, occurring within
the same period shall be reported to the
AMLC.
Provided, that deposits or investments
with any banking institutions or non-bank
financial institutions may be inquired into
or examined without prior court order
pursuant to Republic Act No. 9160, asamended: Provided, further, that any
person of covered institution knowing
that any money, instrument, or property
or its proceeds, represents, involves, or
relates to terrorism or the furtherance
thereof and fails to report the same as
suspicious transactions to the AMLC shall
be criminally liable pursuant to Section 14
of this Act.
Sec. 21. Prosecution of and Jurisdiction
Over Cases Involving Terrorism and
Terrorist Activities. The Regional Trial
Court shall have jurisdiction to try all
offenses punishable under this Act.
Any person may be charged with or
convicted of any offense punishable
under Sections 4, 6, and 7 of this Act
without prejudice to the prosecution of
any act or acts penalized under the
Sec. 18. Prosecution of and Jurisdiction
Over Cases Involving Acts of Terrorism.
The Regional Trial Courts shall have
jurisdiction to try all offenses punishable
under this Act.
Any person may be charged with or
convicted of any offense punishable under
Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 of this Act without
prejudice to the prosecution of any act or
acts penalized under the Revised Penal
SEC. 49. Prosecution Under This Act Shall
be a Bar to Another Prosecution under the
Revised Penal Code or any Special Penal
Laws.- When a person has been
prosecuted under a provision of this Act,
upon a valid complaint or information or
other formal charge sufficient in form and
substance to sustain a conviction and after
the accused had pleaded to the charge, the
acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of
the case shall be a bar to another
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
15/16
15
Revised Penal Code or other special
laws: Provided, That such act or acts are
not absorbed in the offense charged.
When there is a variance between the
offense charged in the complaint or
information, and that proved or
established by the evidence, the accusedshall be convicted of the offense proved
included in the charge if the intent to
create or sow a state of danger, panic or
chaos to the general public, group of
persons or particular persons, or
segment thereof, was not proven during
the trial. No person, however, shall be
twice put in jeopardy of punishment for
the same offense.
Code or other special laws provided that
such acts or acts are not absorbed in the
offense charged.
When there is a variance between the
offense charged in the complaint or
information, and that proved or
established by the evidence, the accusedshall be convicted of the offense proved
included in the charge of the intent to
create or sow a state of danger, panic,
fear or chaos to the general public or a
segment thereof was not proven during
the trial. No person, however, shall be
twice out in jeopardy of punishment for
the same offense.
prosecution for any offense or felony which
is necessarily included in the offense
charged under this Act.
None SEC. 50. Damages for Unproven Charge of
Terrorism.- Upon acquittal, any person
who is accused of terrorism shall beentitled to the payment of damages in the
amount of Five hundred thousand pesos
(P500,000.00) for every day that he or she
has been detained or deprived of liberty or
arrested without a warrant as a result of
such an accusation. The amount of
damages shall be automatically charged
against the appropriations of the police
agency or the Anti-Terrorism Council that
brought or sanctioned the filing of the
charges against the accused. It shall also be
released within fifteen (15) days from the
date of the acquittal of the accused. Theaward of damages mentioned above shall
be without prejudice to the right of the
acquitted accused to file criminal or
administrative charges against those
responsible for charging him with the case
of terrorism.
Any officer, employee, personnel, or
person who delays the release or refuses to
release the amounts awarded to the
individual acquitted of the crime of
terrorism as directed in the paragraphimmediately preceding shall suffer the
penalty of six months of imprisonment.
If the deductions are less than the amounts
due to the detained persons, the amount
needed to complete the compensation
shall be taken from the current
appropriations for intelligence, emergency,
social or other funds of the Office of the
President.
8/12/2019 Comparison Table HB SB RAfinal Final
16/16
16
In the event that the amount cannot be
covered by the current budget of the police
or law enforcement agency concerned, the
amount shall be automatically included in
the appropriations of the said agency for
the coming year.