Clinical Evaluation of the Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Developmental Child with Developmental Delay Delay - - State of the Art State of the Art Michael Shevell MD CM FRCP Michael Shevell MD CM FRCP Professor Professor Departments of Departments of Neurology/Neurosurgery Neurology/Neurosurgery McGill University McGill University Division of Pediatric Neurology Division of Pediatric Neurology Montreal Children Montreal Children ’ ’ s Hospital s Hospital Montreal, Quebec, Canada Montreal, Quebec, Canada
39
Embed
Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Developmental Delay · Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Developmental Delay-State of the Art ... – Vertex/Breech presentation ... Clinical
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Clinical Evaluation of theClinical Evaluation of theChild with DevelopmentalChild with DevelopmentalDelayDelay--State of the ArtState of the Art
Michael Shevell MD CM FRCPMichael Shevell MD CM FRCPProfessorProfessorDepartments ofDepartments ofNeurology/NeurosurgeryNeurology/NeurosurgeryMcGill UniversityMcGill UniversityDivision of Pediatric NeurologyDivision of Pediatric NeurologyMontreal ChildrenMontreal Children’’s Hospitals HospitalMontreal, Quebec, CanadaMontreal, Quebec, Canada
•• Chronic disordersChronic disorders•• Etiologically heterogeneousEtiologically heterogeneous•• Essential feature a recognized disturbanceEssential feature a recognized disturbance
or delay in one or more developmentalor delay in one or more developmentaldomainsdomains
•• Significant & continuing impact on a childSignificant & continuing impact on a child’’ssdevelopmental/functional progressdevelopmental/functional progress
•• Common pediatric problem affecting 5Common pediatric problem affecting 5--10%10%of the pediatric populationof the pediatric population
•• Recognition based on ongoing process ofRecognition based on ongoing process ofdevelopmental surveillance and possiblydevelopmental surveillance and possiblysystematic screeningsystematic screening
Developmental DelayDevelopmental Delay--SubtypesSubtypes•• Global Developmental Delay*Global Developmental Delay*•• Mental Retardation*Mental Retardation*•• Developmental Language DisordersDevelopmental Language Disorders
(Specific Language Impairment)(Specific Language Impairment)•• Gross Motor DelayGross Motor Delay
•• School RelatedSchool Related–– ADHDADHD–– Learning DisabilityLearning Disability
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay
•• Significant delay in two or moreSignificant delay in two or moredevelopmental domainsdevelopmental domains
–– Usually all domains affectedUsually all domains affected
•• Significant=performance two or moreSignificant=performance two or morestandard deviations below the meanstandard deviations below the meanon age appropriate standardizedon age appropriate standardizednorm referenced testsnorm referenced tests
•• Term usually applied to children lessTerm usually applied to children lessthan 5 years of agethan 5 years of age
•• Later diagnosis of mental retardationLater diagnosis of mental retardationfrequentfrequent
Mental RetardationMental Retardation•• Significant subSignificant sub--average general intellectualaverage general intellectual
functioning existing concurrently with deficitsfunctioning existing concurrently with deficitsin adaptive behaviourin adaptive behaviour
•• Limitations in at least two areas of adaptiveLimitations in at least two areas of adaptivebehaviour that reflect the degree to which anbehaviour that reflect the degree to which anindividual functions effectively within societyindividual functions effectively within society
•• Systems of support required across theSystems of support required across thelifespanlifespan
disturbancesdisturbances–– Aggression, stereotypies, obsessions, oppositionAggression, stereotypies, obsessions, opposition–– Actualization of full developmental potentialActualization of full developmental potential
•• Etiology=Etiology=““specific diagnosis that canspecific diagnosis that canbe translated into useful clinicalbe translated into useful clinicalinformation for the family, includinginformation for the family, includingproviding information aboutproviding information aboutprognosis, recurrence risks andprognosis, recurrence risks andpreferred modes of availablepreferred modes of availabletherapytherapy””
•• Usually a question asked andUsually a question asked andanswered only by detailedanswered only by detailedassessmentassessment
conditions, programmatic approach)conditions, programmatic approach)–– PrognosticationPrognostication–– Family empowermentFamily empowerment–– Limitation of further unnecessary testingLimitation of further unnecessary testing
–– EncephalopathyEncephalopathy–– Invariably occurs if intraInvariably occurs if intra--partum difficultiespartum difficulties
are of neurologic relevanceare of neurologic relevance–– SeizuresSeizures–– Feeding difficultiesFeeding difficulties–– Associated conditionsAssociated conditions
arrangementsarrangements•• Special servicesSpecial services
–– RehabilitationRehabilitation–– Social supportsSocial supports
•• Family Centered CareFamily Centered Care–– What are the familyWhat are the family’’s major challenges?s major challenges?–– What shouldWhat should ““wewe”” focus on to providefocus on to provide
greatest benefit?greatest benefit?
HistoryHistory
•• DevelopmentalDevelopmental–– Age of initial concernAge of initial concern–– Domain(s) of concernDomain(s) of concern–– Progression in each domainProgression in each domain–– Current capability in each domainCurrent capability in each domain–– Activities of daily livingActivities of daily living–– Play skillsPlay skills–– Any loss or regression of skills ?Any loss or regression of skills ?
–– Possibility of a neurodegenerative conditionPossibility of a neurodegenerative condition
Physical ExaminationPhysical Examination
•• Fluid & adaptableFluid & adaptable•• Maintain childMaintain child’’s proximity to caregivers proximity to caregiver•• Tell child what to expect even if nonTell child what to expect even if non--
endend•• GeneralGeneral--special emphasis on:special emphasis on:
–– Height/WeightHeight/Weight–– DysmorphicDysmorphic features (look at parents!)features (look at parents!)–– HepatosplenomegalyHepatosplenomegaly–– CutaneousCutaneous markers ofmarkers of phakomatosisphakomatosis–– SpineSpine
–– In the preschool child developmentalIn the preschool child developmentalassessment is the bulk of theassessment is the bulk of the neurologicneurologicexaminationexamination
3. Current developmental level (functional3. Current developmental level (functionalskills)skills)
4. Possible suspected underlying etiology4. Possible suspected underlying etiology–– Directs targeted evaluationDirects targeted evaluation
5. Suspected timing (prenatal vs perinatal vs5. Suspected timing (prenatal vs perinatal vspostnatal)postnatal)
6. Current rehabilitation and social service6. Current rehabilitation and social serviceprovisionprovision–– Identification of needsIdentification of needs
Laboratory InvestigationLaboratory Investigation
•• Selective and rationalSelective and rational•• Determined by history & physicalDetermined by history & physical
•• Not determined by severity of delayNot determined by severity of delay•• Controversy regarding extentControversy regarding extent•• Recent advancesRecent advances
•• American Academy ofAmerican Academy ofNeurology/Child Neurology SocietyNeurology/Child Neurology Society–– Practice ParametersPractice Parameters
–– Guidelines for diagnostic evaluations based onGuidelines for diagnostic evaluations based onavailable evidenceavailable evidence
–– Best practice given a particular situationBest practice given a particular situation–– Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay–– Cerebral PalsyCerebral Palsy–– AutismAutism
–– Algorithms developed yet individual latitudeAlgorithms developed yet individual latitudegiven needs and uniqueness of particulargiven needs and uniqueness of particularclinical situationclinical situation
Recommended TestingRecommended Testing
•• Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay–– LeadLead
–– Targeted to those with identifiable risk factorsTargeted to those with identifiable risk factors–– ThyroidThyroid
–– Targeted to those without newborn screening orTargeted to those without newborn screening orspecific systemic features of hypothroidismspecific systemic features of hypothroidism
–– MetabolicMetabolic–– Indicated if no newborn universal screeningIndicated if no newborn universal screening–– Historical or physical examination findingsHistorical or physical examination findings
suggestive of possible metabolic etiologysuggestive of possible metabolic etiology–– Parental consanguinityParental consanguinity–– Prior lossPrior loss–– Episodic decompensationEpisodic decompensation–– RegressionRegression–– Dysmorphic features/hepatosplenomegalyDysmorphic features/hepatosplenomegaly
Recommended TestingRecommended Testing
•• Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--Parameter RecommendationsParameter Recommendations–– GeneticGenetic
–– Karyotype routinely even if no dysmorphic featuresKaryotype routinely even if no dysmorphic features–– FMR1 molecular genotypingFMR1 molecular genotyping–– FISH if delay unexplained or specific syndromeFISH if delay unexplained or specific syndrome
suggestedsuggested–– EEGEEG
–– Only if suggestion of seizures or an epilepsyOnly if suggestion of seizures or an epilepsysyndromesyndrome
–– NeuroimagingNeuroimaging–– Routine with MRI preferable to CT especially in theRoutine with MRI preferable to CT especially in the
context of physical findingscontext of physical findings–– Hearing/Vision screeningHearing/Vision screening
–– ObligatoryObligatory
Recommended TestingRecommended Testing
•• Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay–– Additional considerationsAdditional considerations
–– Bone age if macrosomic (Soto syndrome)Bone age if macrosomic (Soto syndrome)–– SubSub--telomeric probestelomeric probes–– Array CGHArray CGH
–– FISH study spanning entire genomeFISH study spanning entire genome–– 55--10% yield being reported10% yield being reported
–– MECP2MECP2–– Severe unexplained delay in both females andSevere unexplained delay in both females and
malesmales
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--EtiologyEtiology
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--EtiologyEtiology
•• Factors predictive of etiologic yieldFactors predictive of etiologic yield–– Female gender (2x greater frequency of yield)Female gender (2x greater frequency of yield)–– Abnormal pre/perinatal historyAbnormal pre/perinatal history–– Absence of any autistic featuresAbsence of any autistic features–– MicrocephalyMicrocephaly–– Abnormal neurologic examAbnormal neurologic exam–– Dysmorphic featuresDysmorphic features
•• FactorsFactors notnot predictive of etiologicpredictive of etiologicyieldyield
—— Family history of GDD/MRFamily history of GDD/MR—— Severity of GDDSeverity of GDD—— CoCo--existing seizure disorderexisting seizure disorder—— MacrocephalyMacrocephaly
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--EtiologyEtiology
•• In the absence of any abnormalIn the absence of any abnormalfeatures on history or physicalfeatures on history or physicalexamination, screeningexamination, screeninginvestigations (karyotype, FMR1investigations (karyotype, FMR1molecular genotyping &molecular genotyping &neuroimaging) revealed an underlyingneuroimaging) revealed an underlyingpreviously unsuspected etiology inpreviously unsuspected etiology inan additional onean additional one--sixth (16%) ofsixth (16%) ofchildren with a global developmentalchildren with a global developmentaldelaydelay
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--EtiologyEtiology
•• Autistic features negative predictorAutistic features negative predictor—— Parallels poor etiologic yield in children withParallels poor etiologic yield in children with
•• Severity of delaySeverity of delay notnot a predictor ofa predictor ofetiologic yieldetiologic yield—— Vigor of etiologic search not predicated onVigor of etiologic search not predicated on
how severely affected the child may behow severely affected the child may be—— Severity should not be a factor influencingSeverity should not be a factor influencing
referral for subreferral for sub--specialist evaluationspecialist evaluation
Global Developmental DelayGlobal Developmental Delay--EtiologyEtiology
•• Over a third (42%) of etiologicOver a third (42%) of etiologicdiagnoses potentially preventablediagnoses potentially preventable(intrapartum asphyxia, psychosocial(intrapartum asphyxia, psychosocialdeprivation, toxin exposure) at adeprivation, toxin exposure) at atheoretical leveltheoretical level
•• A third of etiologic diagnoses haveA third of etiologic diagnoses haveimplications regarding recurrenceimplications regarding recurrencerisk estimation and modifications inrisk estimation and modifications inmedical managementmedical management
Key PointsKey Points
•• Recognition of subRecognition of sub--types of globaltypes of globaldevelopmental delay & mentaldevelopmental delay & mentalretardationretardation
•• Overview of comprehensiveOverview of comprehensiveneurodevelopmental assessmentneurodevelopmental assessment
•• Aspects of specialty evaluation &Aspects of specialty evaluation &managementmanagement
•• Importance of etiologicImportance of etiologicdeterminationdetermination