-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT
ASTHMA
Calcium-sensing receptor antagonists abrogateairway
hyperresponsiveness and inflammationin allergic asthmaPolina L.
Yarova,1 Alecia L. Stewart,2* Venkatachalem Sathish,2* Rodney D.
Britt Jr.,2*Michael A. Thompson,2* Alexander P. P. Lowe,4* Michelle
Freeman,2 Bharathi Aravamudan,2
Hirohito Kita,3 Sarah C. Brennan,1 Martin Schepelmann,1 Thomas
Davies,1 Sun Yung,1
Zakky Cholisoh,4 Emma J. Kidd,4 William R. Ford,4 Kenneth J.
Broadley,4 Katja Rietdorf,5
Wenhan Chang,6 Mohd E. Bin Khayat,7 Donald T. Ward,7 Christopher
J. Corrigan,8
Jeremy P. T. Ward,8 Paul J. Kemp,1 Christina M. Pabelick,2 Y. S.
Prakash,2† Daniela Riccardi1†
http://stm.
Dow
nloaded from
Airwayhyperresponsiveness and inflammationare fundamental
hallmarksof allergic asthma that are accompaniedbyincreases in
certain polycations, such as eosinophil cationic protein. Levels of
these cations in body fluids correlatewith asthma severity. We show
that polycations and elevated extracellular calcium activate the
human recombinantandnative calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), leading
to intracellular calciummobilization, cyclic
adenosinemonophos-phate breakdown, and p38 mitogen-activated
protein kinase phosphorylation in airway smooth muscle (ASM)
cells.These effects can be prevented by CaSR antagonists, termed
calcilytics. Moreover, asthmatic patients and allergen-sensitized
mice expressed more CaSR in ASMs than did their healthy
counterparts. Indeed, polycations induced hyper-reactivity
inmousebronchi, and this effectwaspreventedby calcilytics andabsent
inmicewithCaSR ablation fromASM.Calcilytics also reduced airway
hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in allergen-sensitized mice in
vivo. These datashow that a functional CaSR is up-regulated in
asthmatic ASM and targeted by locally produced polycations to
inducehyperresponsiveness and inflammation. Thus, calcilytics may
represent effective asthma therapeutics.
sc
by guest on June 5, 2021
iencemag.org/
INTRODUCTION
Despite substantial advances in our understanding of its
pathophys-iology and improved therapeutic regimens, asthma remains
a tremen-dous worldwide health care burden with around 300 million
individualsufferers. Although the symptoms of asthma are
potentially controllablein most asthma sufferers using conventional
therapy such as topicalbronchodilators and corticosteroids, these
are troublesome to adminis-ter efficiently and present unwanted
side effects. There remains a signif-icant minority of patients
whose symptoms fail to be controlled withthese approaches and who
face chronically impaired quality of life withincreased risk of
hospital admission and even death, although in aminority such
patients account for the major share of asthma healthcare costs.
Accordingly, there is an urgent unmet need for identificationof
novel asthma therapies that target the root cause of the disease
ratherthan its clinical sequelae.
Asthma is characterized by inflammation-driven exaggeration
ofairwaynarrowing in response to specific andnonspecific
environmentalstimuli [nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness
(AHR)], as well aschronic remodeling of the conducting airways (1).
A number of mech-anisms, many driven by inflammation, have been
hypothesized to con-tribute to AHR and/or remodeling. Among these,
there is increasingrecognition that airway inflammation results in
augmented local con-
1School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX,
UK. 2Department of Anes-thesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
55905, USA. 3Department of Medicine, MayoClinic, Rochester, MN
55905, USA. 4Division of Pharmacology, Cardiff University, Schoolof
Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff
CF10 3XF, UK.5Department of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The
Open University, Milton KeynesMK7 6AA, UK. 6Department of Medicine,
UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143,USA. 7Faculty of
Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
8Division ofAsthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King’s College
London, London SE1 9RT, UK.*These authors contributed equally to
this work.†Corresponding author. E-mail: riccardi@cf.ac.uk (D.R.);
prakash.ys@mayo.edu (Y.S.P.)
www.Scie
centrations of polycations (2–7). The polycations eosinophil
cationicprotein (ECP) and major basic protein are well-established
markersfor asthma severity and stability, with some evidence that
theymay con-tribute directly to the pathogenesis of asthma (6,
8–10). Furthermore, inasthma, increased arginase activity diverts
L-arginine toward increasedproduction of the polycations spermine,
spermidine, and putrescine(4, 5, 11). Although in human peripheral
blood monocytes spermineexhibits anti-inflammatory properties (12),
associations between in-creases in polycations in the asthmatic
airwaymucosa andAHR/airwayremodeling and inflammation (4, 5, 13)
have long been apparent andascribed to their positive charge (9).
However, the cause-effect relationshipremains hitherto
unexplained.Here, we provide evidence that activation ofthe cell
surface, G protein (heterotrimeric guanine
nucleotide–bindingprotein)–coupled calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR)
by polycations drivesAHR and inflammation in allergic asthma.
The CaSR is the master controller of extracellular free ionized
calci-um ion (Ca2+o) concentration via the regulation of
parathyroid hor-mone (PTH) secretion (14). Accordingly, CaSR-based
therapeutics isused for the treatment of systemic disorders of
mineral ionmetabolism.Pharmacological activators of theCaSR
(calcimimetics) are used to treathyperparathyroidism, and negative
allosteric modulators of the CaSR(calcilytics) are in clinical
development for treating autosomal domi-nant hypocalcemia (15).
In addition to its pivotal role in divalent cation homeostasis,
theCaSR is expressed in tissues not involved in mineral ion
metabolismsuch as the blood vessels, breast, and placenta, where
the CaSR regulatesmany fundamental processes including gene
expression, ion channelactivity, and cell fate (16). Furthermore,
altered CaSR expression hasalso been associated with several
pathological conditions including in-flammation, vascular
calcification, and certain cancers (16–19). In thesenoncalciotropic
tissues, theCaSR responds to a range of stimuli including
nceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 1
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/284/284ra60.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
not only Ca2+o but also polyvalent cations,aminoacids, ionic
strength, andpH,makingthis receptor uniquely capable of
integratingmultiple environmental signals. Owing toits ability to
act as a multimodal chemo-sensor, the potential relevance of CaSRto
asthma pathophysiology is manifold,yet there is currently no
evidence regard-ing CaSR expression or function in asth-ma. In this
regard, a fundamental aspectof asthma pathophysiology is
elevatedintracellular calcium ion concentration([Ca2+]i) in airway
smooth muscle (ASM)cells that is not only critical to the
enhancedbronchoconstriction of nonspecific AHRbut also implicated
in longer-term, likelygenomic effects that result in airway
re-modeling such as increased ASM cellproliferation (leading to
airwaywall thick-ening) and deposition of extracellularmatrix
components (20, 21). There is cur-rently no information as to
whether theCaSR can regulate [Ca2+]i in the asthmaticairways, even
though a polycation sensorsuch as the CaSR, whose activation
leadsto an increase in [Ca2+]i, seems a likely can-didate.
Therefore, we hypothesized thatif a CaSR was to be found in the
airways,it would sense and respond not only toinflammation-enhanced
Ca2+o but alsoto polycations such as the ECPs
andL-arginine–derivedpolyaminesputrescine,spermidine, and spermine,
whose produc-tion is markedly increased during asth-ma (3–7, 11) or
bymany RNA respiratoryviruses that exacerbate asthma, such as
in-fluenza A and Newcastle disease virus,which either contain
polyamines in the vi-ral envelope or produce them as part oftheir
requirement for replication (22, 23).To test our hypothesis, we
examined hu-man ASM samples from nonasthmaticand asthmatic
subjects, and used two mod-els of allergen-induced airway
inflammation,together with a mouse model of targetedCaSR gene
ablation from ASM.
RESULTS
CaSR expression in human andmouse airways is increasedduring
asthmaIn human bronchial biopsies and inmouseinterlobular bronchi,
CaSR was immu-nolocalized within the SM22a-positivesmooth muscle
layer, with additional ex-pression in bronchial epithelium (Fig.
1A).
Fig. 1. CaSR immunolocalizes to human andmouse airways and is
overexpressed in asthma. (A) Hu-man airway biopsy (upper panels) or
mouse intralobular bronchi (lower panels) stained with CaSR
antibody
(red) and SM22a (green) show immunoreactivity in both smooth
muscle and epithelium. Scale bars,10 mm.(B) Human and mouse ASM
cells stained with anti-SM22a antibody and showing CaSR
immunoreactivity.Scale bars,100 mm. (C) qRT-PCR shows higher CaSR
expression in moderate asthmatics than in healthysubjects [n = 4
patients per group, fold change versus healthy, mean (line) ± SD
(box)]. (D) Western analysisof CaSR protein shows substantially
elevated CaSR expression in moderate asthmatics (n = 5 patients
pergroup). (E) Exposure of healthy human ASM cells to TNF-a (20
ng/ml) or IL-13 (50 ng/ml) for 48 hours signifi-cantly increased
CaSR protein expression (n = 5 patients per group) compared to
vehicle control for either cy-tokine. (F) CaSRmRNA expression was
significantly greater in mice after induction of airway
inflammation withMAs in comparison to unsensitized mice [n = 4 mice
per group; 10 airways per mouse, fold change versusunsensitized,
mean (line) ± SD (box)]. Statistical comparisons were performed [on
DDCt values for (C) and(F)] by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t
tests (C, D, and F) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
withBonferroni post hoc test (E). *P
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
Isolated human and mouse ASM cells retained CaSR expression(Fig.
1B).
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
(qRT-PCR)and Western analysis of human ASM cells demonstrated that
bothCaSRmRNA (Fig. 1C) and protein (Fig. 1D) expression were
increasedabout threefold in moderate asthmatics compared to
nonasthmatics(“healthy”). Furthermore, in human ASM cells from
healthy indivi-duals, 48 hours of exposure to the asthma-associated
proinflammatorycytokines, tumor necrosis factor–a (TNF-a) and
interleukin-13 (IL-13),significantly increased CaSR protein
expression (Fig. 1E and fig. S1C).qRT-PCR of laser capture
microdissected ASM layers of intralobularbronchi in lung sections
showed an about threefold increase in CaSRmRNA expression in mixed
allergen (MA)–sensitized mice comparedto ASM from unsensitized mice
(Fig. 1F). Together, these results indi-cate that the CaSR is
present in human andmouse ASM and its expres-sion is increased in
asthma. Furthermore, in vitro effects of cytokines onhuman ASM, and
the effects of MA sensitization in a mouse model ofallergic asthma,
provide an evidence for the role of inflammation in up-regulation
of CaSR expression.
Polycations implicated in asthma pathogenesis activatethe human
CaSRInmany cell types, CaSR activation results in an increase in
intracellularCa2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) arising frommobilization
of Ca
2+i (14). To
test the hypothesis that polycations that are up-regulated
during asthmaactivate theCaSR,wemeasured changes in [Ca2+]i
inhumanembryonickid-ney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing the human
CaSR (HEK-CaSR),or HEK293 cells stably expressing an empty vector
(HEK-0). A repre-sentative Western blot of HEK-CaSR and HEK-0 is
shown in fig. S2A.Consistent with this hypothesis, HEK-CaSR, but
not HEK-0, cells ex-hibited significant increases in [Ca2+]i after
exposure to (i) ECP [10mg/ml,a concentration well below the
cytotoxic levels (24) and comparable tothose measured in the sputum
of some asthmatic subjects (6, 7)], (ii)the polycationic peptide
poly-L-arginine [PLA; 300 nM; amimetic ofma-jor basic protein (8)],
and (iii) the polycation spermine (1 mM) (Fig. 2Aand fig. S2, B to
D, for single traces). For each of these agonists, the in-crease in
[Ca2+]i was inhibited by the calcilytic NPS89636 (100 nM) (Fig.2A
and fig. S2, B to D, for single traces). Additional calcilytics,
NPS2143(1 mM) or Calhex 231 (1 mM), also prevented spermine-induced
CaSRactivation (Fig. 2A and fig. S2D).
Calcilytics prevent increases in Ca2+i in ASM fromasthmatic
patientsIn human ASM, several endogenously produced agents such as
acetyl-choline (ACh) and histamine evoke increases in [Ca2+]i,
which driveAHR, remodeling, and production of a range of
inflammatory cytokinesand other mediators in asthma (20, 25).
Accordingly, we hypothesizedthat activation of CaSR in ASM also
leads to an increase in [Ca2+]i, andpredicted that this effect
would be enhanced in asthmatics.
We found that the sensitivity of human asthmatic ASM in the
ab-sence of agents that increase [Ca2+]i was significantly higher
than that ofASM from nonasthmatics in the presence of 2mM [Ca2+]o
(Fig. 2B, leftpanel, and fig. S3, A andB, for single traces).
Inhibition of theCaSRwiththe calcilytic NPS2143 (1 mM) blunted the
[Ca2+]o hyperresponsivenessof asthmatic ASM cells, highlighting the
functional role of CaSR in thissetting (Fig. 2B, right panel, and
fig. S3, A and B, for single traces).
Having determined the sensitivity of human ASM to [Ca2+]o,
wethen tested the ability of the CaSR to alter [Ca2+]i responses to
ACh
www.Scie
in human asthmatic and healthy ASM. In the presence of
physio-logical [Ca2+]o [that is, 1 mM, at which the CaSR is
half-maximallyactive (14)], exposure to 1 mM ACh produced the
expected increase in[Ca2+]i, which was significantly greater in ASM
from asthmatic pa-tients (Fig. 2C). Inhibiting CaSR with NPS2143
reduced the [Ca2+]iresponse to ACh to levels that were not
significantly different fromthose measured in healthy ASM (Fig. 2C
and fig. S3C). These effectswere even more pronounced in the
presence of 2 mM Ca2+o, a con-centration at which the CaSR is fully
active, whereas they could not beobserved in the presence of 0.5 mM
[Ca2+]o, which is below thethreshold for CaSR activation (fig.
S3C).
Histamine (1 mM) also evoked an increase in [Ca2+]i in both
healthyand asthmatic ASM, which was significantly greater in
asthmatic ASM(Fig. 2D). Preexposure of asthmatic ASM to calcilytic
also reduced [Ca2+]iresponses to histamine so that they did not
differ statistically fromthose in healthyASM (Fig. 2D).
Furthermore, an alternative,membrane-impermeant CaSR agonist, Gd3+
(0.1 mM), evoked a further increase in[Ca2+]i in human ASM in the
absence (fig. S3D) or presence (fig. S3E) ofhistamine, effects that
were greater in asthmatic than in nonasthmaticASM cells. Together,
these results demonstrate that, in ASM cells, theCaSR is functional
and contributes to the regulation of baseline ASM[Ca2+]i.
Accordingly, in asthmatic ASM cells, the CaSR may contributeto a
higher baseline [Ca2+]i, a leading cause of AHR, whereas
calcilyticsrestore baseline [Ca2+]i.
Calcilytics abrogate signaling pathways characteristic ofairway
contractility and asthma in human ASMTo determine potential
mechanisms by which CaSR modulates con-tractility relevant to
asthma, we explored two mechanisms in non-asthmatic and asthmatic
ASM: cyclic adenosine monophosphate(cAMP), which should induce
bronchodilation, and phospholipaseC (PLC)/inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), an important contributorto
bronchoconstriction, with the idea that CaSR activation
shouldsuppress cAMP but elevate IP3 (16). Indeed, in the presence
of 2 mMCa2+o, cAMP levels were low, and calcilytics increased cAMP,
partic-ularly in asthmatic ASM (fig. S3F). Measurements of cellular
IP3 con-tent showed that, particularly in asthmatic ASM, CaSR
antagonistsuppressed the elevated levels of IP3 in the presence of
2 mM Ca
2+o
(fig. S3G).In addition to targeting phosphodiesterases to
inhibit cAMP
breakdown, many of the pipeline or existing drugs for asthma
targetactivation of signaling pathways dependent on extracellular
signal–regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 mitogen-activated protein
kinase(MAPK), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt phosphorylation
(26, 27).Therefore, we examined the effect of activation of the ASM
CaSR onthese pathways in human ASM cells. In healthy ASM, CaSR
activationwith 5mMCa2+o induced a significant increase in
p38MAPKphospho-rylation, an effect that was prevented by
co-incubation with a calcilytic.Calcilytic treatment reduced ERK1/2
andAkt phosphorylation at 5mMCa2+o (Fig. 2, E and F, and fig. S4
for technical replicates). Overall, thesedata highlight the ability
of CaSR to modulate signaling pathways acti-vated during asthma,
which may contribute to altered ASM functionbeyond [Ca2+]i.
SM22aCaSR∆flox/∆flox mice are protected frompolycation-induced
bronchoconstrictionTo determine whether activation of the CaSR in
ASM leads to AHRin vivo, we generated mice with targeted CaSR
ablation from visceral
nceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 3
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
www.ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
SM cells by breeding LoxP-CaSRmice withSM22a-Cre mice (28, 29).
The resultingSM22aCaSR∆flox/∆flox mice [knockout (KO);fig. S5] were
comparable to Cre-negative[wild-type (WT)] littermates in
appear-ance, reproductive abilities, body weight,and life
expectancy (fig. S5, B and C).Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
analysisshows that molecular CaSR ablation fromASM resulted in a
significant reduction inCaSR immunoreactivity in KO cells, whichwas
27% of that seen in WT cells. In con-trast, CaSR ablation from ASM
cells didnot significantly alter the expression ofthe smooth muscle
marker SM22a (fig.S5D). Successful ASM CaSR ablation
wasdemonstrated functionally by the evidencethat Ca2+o (1 to 5 mM)
and an alternative,membrane-impermeant CaSR agonist,Gd3+ (100 mM to
1 mM), evoked an in-crease in [Ca2+]i in WT ASM cells, whichwas
significantly greater than that mea-sured in cells from KO mice
(fig. S5E,upper panels for single traces and lowerpanels for
biological replicates). Never-theless, lungs from KOmice appeared
his-tomorphologically comparable to those ofWT mice and did not
exhibit fibrosis, in-flammation, or impaired alveolarization(fig.
S5F). Intralobular bronchi from WTandKOmice also had comparable
luminaldiameters (fig. S5G).
The intrinsic baseline contractility ofintralobular bronchi was
not affected byCaSR ablation from ASM cells, as shownby exposure
either to high K+ (40 mM,fig. S5H) or to increasing
concentrationsof ACh (1 nM to 30 mM), both of whichevoked
bronchoconstriction of compa-rable magnitude in WT and KO
mousebronchi (Fig. 3A). In intralobular bron-chi from WT mice,
treatment with eitherspermine (300 mM, Fig. 3B) or 2.5 mM[Ca2+]o
(Fig. 3E) enhanced the broncho-constrictor response to ACh. CaSR
ablationfrom ASM blunted both spermine-induced(Fig. 3C) and
[Ca2+]o-induced (Fig. 3F)sensitization of the ACh response.
Further-more, spermine (10 mM to 3 mM) inducedsensitization of the
ACh response in pre-contractedWT, but not inKOmouse bron-chi (Fig.
3D).Consistentwith these findings,spermine also enhanced the
response toACh (0.5 mM) in precision-cut lung slicesfromWT animals
(Fig. 3G, and summaryin Fig. 3H). This effect was prevented
bycalcilytic treatment (NPS89636, 300 nM,Fig. 3H). However, the
effects of either
Fig. 2. Polycations activate the human CaSR in recombinant
systems and human ASM cells, partic-ularly those from asthmatics.
(A) ECPs (n = 7), PLA (n = 6), or spermine (n = 17) each increased
[Ca2+] in
iHEK-CaSR, but not in HEK-0 cells (ECP, n = 3; PLA, n = 6;
spermine, n = 6). In HEK-CaSR cells, the calcilyticNPS89636
prevented these increases (ECP, n = 3; PLA, n = 3; and spermine, n
= 4). Two alternative calcilytics,NPS2143 (n=4) andCalhex 231
(n=5), also prevented spermine-inducedCaSR activation. (B) In
humanASMcells, exposure to 2 mM [Ca2+]o increased [Ca
2+]i in asthmatic but not in healthy ASM cells (left), an
effectpreventedby the calcilytic NPS2143 (right) (n=3each). (C
andD) In the presenceof 1mMCa2+o, exposure toACh (C) (n = 4
healthy, n = 4 asthmatic) or histamine (D) (n = 5 healthy, n = 4
asthmatic) resulted in increasesin [Ca2+]i, which was greater in
asthmatic ASM cells. This effect was prevented by NPS2143. ns, not
signif-icant. (E and F) Western analysis [exemplar gel (E) and
summary data (F)] of healthy ASM cell lysates showsthe effects of 5
mM Ca2+o in the absence or presence of NPS2143 on Akt, p38 MAPK,
and ERK phosphoryl-ation (n=17 to 19 independent experiments
fromcells isolated fromn=2nonasthmatic patients).
Statisticalsignificance was determined by one-way ANOVA with
Bonferroni post hoc test (A), two-way ANOVA withBonferroni post hoc
test (B to D), or one-way ANOVAwith Dunn post hoc test (F). *P<
0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P <0.001, significantly different from
control HEK-CaSR (A), from control healthy or asthmatic ASM (B to
D), orfrom 5mMCa2+o (B). Source data, details of the statistical
analysis, and P values are given in the Supplemen-tary Excel
spreadsheet.
22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284 284ra60 4
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
spermine or calcilytic were not observedin lung slices from KO
mice (Fig. 3G, andsummary in Fig. 3I). Together, these
obser-vations suggest that activation of the ASMCaSR leads to AHR,
an effect that can beprevented by calcilytic treatment.
Calcilytics reduce airway resistancein MA-sensitized mice in
vivoTo test the effects of pharmacologicalCaSR activators and
inhibitors on pul-monary resistance, we directly measuredairflow
resistance (RL) in anaesthetized,paralyzed, mechanically
ventilatedmice.In naïvemice, acute preexposure (10min)to the
nebulized calcimimetic R568 (1 mM)resulted in an increase inRL
across the lungsafter inhalational challenge with the syn-thetic
muscarinic receptor agonist metha-choline (MCh; 0 to 50 mg/ml),
whereasthe calcilytic NPS2143 (1 mM) was able toreverse this effect
(Fig. 4A). Next, we devel-oped an MA murine asthma model thatleads
to robust inflammation and remodel-ing in the lungs
ofMA-sensitizedmice (fig.S6). In these mice, there was a marked
in-crease in RL after MCh challenge, and pre-exposure toR568
resulted in an even greaterincrease in RL. Moreover, the calcilytic
wasable to significantly reduce AHR in thesemice (Fig. 4B).
Calcilytics reduce AHR andinflammation in
ovalbumin-sensitized,ovalbumin-challengedmice in vivoIncreased
arginase activity drives AHR viathe production of polyamines (4, 5,
11),but whether the CaSR is involved in thisprocess is unknown. To
test the ability ofcalcilytics to prevent polycation-inducedAHR in
vivo, we assessed the effects ofnebulizedPLA(3mM)in thepresenceor
ab-sence of the calcilytic NPS89636 (3 mM).As an alternative,
noninvasive methodformeasurement of AHR (30, 31), we per-formed
whole-body plethysmography inconscious, unrestrained naïve mice
bymeasuring enhanced pause (Penh). Al-though Penh does not directly
measureairway resistance, particularly in obligatenasal breathers
such as mice, it has beenwidely used as an indicator of airway
ob-struction in response to inhaledMCh (0.1to 100 mg/ml) (31). PLA
significantlyincreased Penh at MCh concentrationsgreater than 10
mg/ml, an effect that wasabolishedbycotreatmentwith
thenebulized
Fig. 3. CaSR ablation fromASM cells blunts polycation-induced
bronchoconstriction. (A to F) Tensionmeasurements in intralobular
bronchi frommice with targeted CaSR ablation from ASM cells
(SM22aCaSR∆flox/∆flox,
KO) and from SM22a-Cre mice (WT). (A) Under control conditions,
bronchial contractility to ACh was notaffected by CaSR ablation
(WT, n = 14; KO, n = 12). Exposure to spermine enhanced
contractility to AChin WT (B, n = 6) but not in KO mice (C, n = 7).
(D) Spermine alone induced constriction in WT but not inKOmouse
intralobular bronchi, whichwas significant at 1mM (WT,n=4; KO,n=7)
and above (WT,n=3; KO,n=7). The sensitivity to AChwas increasedwhen
[Ca2+]owas raised from thephysiological 1 to 2.5mM inWTmice (E, n =
6) but not in KO mice (F, n = 7). (G to I) In precision-cut lung
slices fromWT mice, ACh-inducedcontraction of intralobular bronchi
was potentiated by spermine and prevented by the calcilytic
NPS89636(G, upper panels) [representative of seven experiments;
summary in (H); n= 7], whereas therewas no sperm-inepotentiationor
calcilytic effect in KOmice (G, lower panels) [representativeof
four experiments; summaryin (I); n = 4]. Scale bar,100 mm.
Statistical comparisons were made by two-way ANOVA (A to F)
(between curvesand for WT versus KO for identical agonist
concentrations) or two-tailed, paired Student’s t test (H and I)
(per-formed on the nonnormalized data). *P < 0.05, **P <
0.01, ***P < 0.001, statistically different from
respectiveWTcontrols. Source data, details of the statistical
analysis, and P values are given in the Supplementary
Materials.
www.ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue
284 284ra60 5
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXTD
ow
calcilytic. Calcilytic treatment per se significantly reduced
Penh in naïveanimals treated with MCh (30 mg/ml) (Fig. 5A).
Having demonstrated the ability of calcilytics to reduce AHR
evokedby polyamines, we tested their anti-inflammatory properties
in an es-tablishedmodel of allergic asthma (31), the ovalbumin
(OVA)–sensitized,OVA-challengedmouse. Calcilytic inhalation
significantly reduced AHRinduced by OVA sensitization (Fig. 5B).
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF) collected from the
calcilytic-treated mice also showed a significantreduction in
inflammatory cell infiltration (total numbers, macrophages,
eo-sinophils, and lymphocytes; Fig. 5C) and concentrations of ECP,
IL-5, IL-13,and TNF-a (Fig. 5D) when compared to their
vehicle-treated counterparts.Biochemical analysisof
terminalbloodsamples showed that inhaledcalcilyticdid not
significantly affect serum ionized calcium at 1 hour after
inhalation(vehicle control 0.9 ± 0.1mMversus calcilytic 0.8 ±
0.1mM;P > 0.05; n=3 per experimental group) and up to 24 hours
(1.0 ± 0.1 mM and 1.0 ±0.1 mM, 4 and 24 hours after calcilytic
treatment, respectively; P > 0.05;n=3per experimental
group).These results suggest that theobservedeffectsof the
calcilytics are not ascribed to systemic changes in Ca2+o
homeostasis.
http:nloaded from
DISCUSSION
Our study highlights the expression of the CaSR inASMand
identifies afundamental pathophysiological role for this receptor
in the context of
www.Scie
by guest on June 5, 2021//stm
.sciencemag.org/
asthma. The fact that inflammatory cationic proteins known to
corre-late with asthma severity can activate the CaSR expressed by
ASM cellsat physiologically relevant concentrations to elevate
[Ca2+]i and increasethe contractility of the ASMnonspecifically
provides both a rational ex-planation for the genesis of
nonspecific AHR in asthma and a basis forthe direct mechanistic
link between this phenomenon and airway in-flammation. These
findings raise the possibility that the CaSR directlyinfluences
mechanisms involved in inflammatory cell recruitment andactivation.
In turn, production of asthma-relevant cytokines can
furtherincrease CaSR expression, thereby generating a positive
feedback loop.Thus, locally delivered calcilytics would have the
advantage of breakingthis cycle by reducing inflammation and by
blunting ASM hyperre-sponsiveness. Indeed, in two different in
vivomodels of allergic asthma,interfering with CaSR signaling
positively affects multiple aspects ofairway disease, benefits not
achieved by single-drug therapies. In thissense, the CaSR
represents a truly novel potential therapeutic targetin asthma.
[Ca2+]o is known to be increased at inflammation sites (18,
32),therefore activating the CaSR, leading to an increase in
[Ca2+]i andp38 MAPK activation and a decrease in the intracellular
cAMP pool.In addition, the CaSR is activated by a plethora of
molecules, particu-larly polyamines, which act orthosterically
(independently of [Ca2+]o) tohelp stabilize the unique
conformations of the receptor. This leadsto preferential coupling
to different G proteins, a process defined asligand-directed
targeting of receptor stimulus (33). The relevance of theCaSR to
local and systemic symptoms in asthma and other airway dis-eases is
potentially immense, extending beyond its innate expression inASM
and any local regulation of [Ca2+]o. In asthma, airway
inflamma-tion leads to increased release of polycations, which are
acceptedmarkersof asthma severity, locally and into the systemic
circulation (2–7). SputumECP concentrations in asthmatics have been
reported to attain about10 mg/ml (6, 7), which here we show to be
well within the concentrationrange sufficient to activate the CaSR.
Added to this is arginase-drivenproduction of spermine, spermidine,
and putrescine, which are increas-ingly implicated in asthma
pathophysiology (4, 5, 11). From an envi-ronmental perspective,
CaSR agonists may also be presented to theairways in the form of
smoke (Ni2+) or car fumes (Pb2+ and Cd2+)(34) and bacterial/viral
infections (polyamines) (22, 23).
In addition to elevating [Ca2+]i and, therefore, priming ASM
cells torespond with a lower threshold to pathophysiological
stimuli, CaSRmay also enhance sensitization of airways to Ca2+, for
example, via cou-pling to protein kinase C and Rho kinase, as
demonstrated in other cellsystems, namely, HEK-CaSR (35), a topic
that is currently unexploredin the lung but is highly relevant to
the increasing interest in targetingsensitization mechanisms (36).
Beyond contributions to AHR andairway remodeling (25), calcilytics
prevent activation of intracellularpathways, which are currently
being targeted by pipeline asthma drugs,specifically p38 MAPK and
phosphodiesterase inhibitors (26). Indeed,both classes of
inhibitors target various inflammatory cells, which re-lease key
mediators responsible for the remodeling and
inflammationcharacteristic of these diseases. For this reason,
local delivery of calcily-tics has the potential to target not only
one of the key possible causes forasthma but also the production of
proinflammatory cytokines that con-tribute to its exacerbations.
Consistent with this hypothesis is the abilityof the calcilytics to
reduce inflammatory cell infiltration in the BALF ofOVA-sensitized
mice.
Our ex vivo experiments show that activation of the airway
CaSRincreases responses to bronchoconstrictors by about 20 to 25%.
Albeit
Fig. 4. Activation of the airway CaSR exacerbates AHR in vivo.
(A) In me-chanically ventilated, unsensitized mice, acute exposure
to the calcimimetic
R568 increasedbronchoconstriction toMChchallenge,measured as
increasedairway resistance (RL). The calcilytic prevented the AHR
induced by R568, butevinced little effect on its own. (B)
MA-sensitized mice showed enhanced re-sponse to MCh. Preexposure to
the calcimimetic resulted in a further increasein RL , whereas the
calcilytic NPS2143 reducedAHR. Statistical comparisons be-tween the
curvesweremadeby two-wayANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc test.n=5per
condition. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 statistically different
from control, ###P <0.001 statistically different from
calcimimetic. Source data, details of the sta-tistical analysis,
and P values are given in the Supplementary Materials.
nceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 6
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
apparently small, this effect is substantial if we consider that
resistanceto the air flow increases to the reciprocal of the fourth
power of thebronchial radius. Indeed, direct measurements of airway
resistance innaïve animals show that CaSR activators increase RL by
roughly three-fold. Thus, antagonizing theCaSRmight provide a
highly beneficialma-neuver for the treatment of AHR in vivo.
Individually, each of the approaches used in the current study
has itsinherent limitation. Concerning the ex vivo studies, wire
myography rec-ords small airway tension in isolation, and although
lung slices allowairway lumen size measurements in a system where
the local paracrineenvironment is intact, there is no active
innervation. For in vivo studies,flexiVent data are obtained in
anaesthetizedmice,which aremechanicallyventilated, and even
thoughwhole-animal plethysmography records lungfunction in freely
moving, spontaneously breathing animals, it can onlyreport
indirectly on airway resistance. However, this broad set of
exper-imental approaches has generated complementary data sets
that, as thecomplexity of themeasuring systems steadily builds,
have provided com-prehensive, overlapping evidence to show
calcilytic-dependent diminu-tion of airway responsiveness in normal
and pathological paradigms.This idea is central to the thesis that
locally delivered calcilytics may rep-resent a brand new
therapeutic approach to the treatment of asthma.
www.ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org
Asthma represents a multifactorial dis-ease, involving many cell
types in the air-way beyond immune cells, including theepithelium
and ASM. Accordingly, the ex-pression and potential role of CaSR
incells of the airways become important. Al-though our study
focused on the ASMCaSR, it is worth noting that our observa-tions
demonstrate CaSR expression inairway epithelial cells. Epithelial
cell dam-age is pathognomonic of asthma, whereasthe presence of
environmental polyaminesand other CaSR activators might
directlyactivate a functional epithelial CaSR, whichmight in turn
contribute to airway remod-eling and altered epithelial
permeabilityin asthma, as demonstrated by CaSR ac-tivation in other
epithelia (16). On theother hand, CaSR is functionally expressedin
human andmouse macrophages, whereit plays a crucial role in
activation ofNLRP3inflammasome and release of IL-1b (17, 18),known
to be involved in asthma patho-genesis. In addition, we found CaSR
ex-pression in human eosinophils (fig. S7),and previous studies
have shown that eo-sinophil degranulation (37) and migra-tion
across the lung epithelium (38) isalso Ca2+o-dependent. Although
our dataclearly show a role for the ASMCaSR, par-ticularly in the
context of airway inflamma-tion and asthma, given the expression
ofCaSR on both immune and epithelial cells,exploring their role
will be important in fu-ture studies in the context of
identifyingCaSR modulators to alleviate AHR and al-lergic
asthma.
Owing to their ability to evoke rapid fluctuations in plasma
PTH, aknown anabolic stimulus to bone growth, systemic calcilytics
were ini-tially developed as anti-osteoporotic drugs and reached
phase 2 clinicaltrials for this purpose in humans (39). Our in vivo
data indicate thatlocally delivered calcilytics do not
significantly affect plasma [Ca2+]olevels (hence, presumably PTH
levels) up to 24 hours after treatment,suggesting that calcilytic
administration directly to the lung in humansshould not negatively
affect mineral ion homeostasis.
Amajor implication of CaSR in the airway is its potential for
targetingin the context of disease. Accordingly, calcilytic-based
therapeutics coulddo both, prevent as well as relieve AHR. What is
unclear at present iswhether CaSR overexpression and/or its
responsiveness to polycationsand calcilytics is uniform across the
entire spectrum of asthma, particu-larly in view of the
understanding that severe asthmamay differ in patho-physiology and
responsiveness to conventional pharmacotherapy (40).This
reservation notwithstanding, it would certainly seem likely thatone
appealing line of future research will be the possibility that the
CaSRcan contribute to the development of asthma in some patients by
creatinga permissive environment for polycation action, with the
corollary thatsuch patients can be identified and treated
prophylactically. Furthermore,given the involvement of polycations
in other environmental airway
Fig. 5. Nebulized calcilytics prevent AHR and inflammation in
mice in vivo. (A) Nebulized calcilytic(NPS89636) prevented
PLA-induced AHR in unsensitized, consciousmice. Data are presented
as percentage
changes in enhanced pause, Penh (DPenh, %), in MCh-challenged
mice (n = 6 mice per condition). (B to D)Calcilytic abrogated
hyperresponsiveness (B) (n = 5 for control, n = 6 each for vehicle
and calcilytic), reducedinflammatory cell infiltration (C) (n=11),
and the concentrations of ECP (n=11), IL-5, IL-13, and TNF-a (D)
(n=10 for vehicle, and n = 11 for calcilytic) into the BALF from
OVA-sensitized, OVA-challenged mice. *P < 0.05,**P
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT
insults, such as from pollution and respiratory infection, one
mightspeculate that the potential exists for CaSR-targeted
approaches to al-leviate other inflammatory airway diseases.
by guest on June 5, 2021http://stm
.sciencemag.org/
Dow
nloaded from
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study designThe objectives of the study were to test the
hypothesis that the CaSR is apotential anti-AHR and
anti-inflammatory target for asthma therapy.
For experiments in primary human ASM cells, all protocols
wereapproved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
Surgical lungspecimens of patients undergoing lobectomy for focal,
noninfectiousdisease were obtained, and normal areas of third- to
sixth-generationbronchi were identified and dissected for further
use. Patient clinicaldata (combination of physician diagnosis,
pulmonary function tests in-cluding bronchodilator responses, and
imaging results) were used toidentify those with moderate asthma
versus not. However, once thesedata were recorded, all patient
identifiers were deleted, and sampleswere stored and processed with
unique number identifiers, preventingretrospective identification
of patients. Accordingly, the protocol wasconsidered “minimal risk”
and did not require explicit patient consent.For both asthmatics
(all moderate, n = 5) and nonasthmatics (healthy;patients with no
documented history of asthma, n = 5), patient agesranged from 40 to
80 years. Both groups included only those patientsundergoing
thoracic surgery for focal, noninfectious pathology (for ex-ample,
localized tumor with negative lymph nodes;
bronchoalveolarcarcinomawas excluded). Samples in either groupwere
used for a rangeof experimental protocols, although not all five
patient samples wereused for every protocol.
All animal procedures were approved by local ethical review
andconformed with the regulations of the UK Home Office and
theAnimal Care and Use Committees of all the participating
institutions.Procedures were in strict accordance to the guidelines
of the AmericanPhysiological Society.
Mice with CaSR-targeted gene ablation from ASM cells were
gener-ated by breeding SM22a-Cre recombinase mice (28) with LoxP
CaSR(flanking exon 7 of CaSR) (29). The floxed CaSRmouse strain was
gen-erated from C57BL/6 × SVJ129 mice backcrossed with C57BL/6 for
atleast eight generations. SM22a-Cre+ were bred with floxed-CaSR+/+
togenerate SMCaSR∆flox/∆flox mice (lacking full-length CaSR in
ASM),which were used as KO mice, and SM22a-Cre−/− ×
floxed-CaSR+/+
(expressing full-length CaSR in ASM) acted as WT, control
mice.CaSR-LoxP × SM22a-Cre mice were inbred for at least three
genera-tions before being used for experiments. Both WT and KO mice
arefertile and viable with a normal life span (fig. S5, B and C).
For theMA model, 6- to 8-week-old C57/Bl6 mice were purchased from
TheJackson Laboratory, and for noninvasive Penh measurements, 6- to
8-week-old BalbC male mice were used (Harlan). For laser capture
mi-croscopy experiments, lungs from four mice (10 airways per
mouse)were used. For Ca2+i imaging in human ASM, wire myography,
andlung slice experiments, on the basis of our previous experience,
aminimum of three patients per condition (at least 15 cells per
experi-ment per patient) or a minimum of three mice per genotype
are re-quired to achieve statistical significance. For experiments
in humanASM, wire myography, lung slices, and in vivo
plethysmography, lackof responses to ACh (in vitro and ex vivo
experiments) orMCh (in vivoexperiments) was a preestablished
exclusion criterion, as was obvious
www.Scie
epithelial damage or denudation in lung slice experiments
whensamples were observed under light microscopy. Data are
presented asaverage ± SEM, which was calculated invariably from n
(the number ofpatients or animals, biological replicates), with the
exception ofWesternanalysis of Akt, p38MAPK, and ERK1/2
phosphorylation, where n rep-resents the number of individual
experiments (technical replicates).Animals were assigned to the
experimental groups at random, butthe investigators were not
blinded.Where appropriate, data were testedfor normality
(Shapiro-Wilk test).
In vitro studiesHuman ASM cells. Human ASM cells were isolated
and cultured
as previously described (41) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium/F12 (Life Technologies) supplementedwith 10% fetal bovine
serum, pen-icillin, and streptomycin. Culturingwas limited to less
than four passages,and retention of the ASM phenotype was verified
by expression ofsmooth muscle cell markers SM22a or calponin.
HEK-293 studies. Cells stably transfectedwith humanCaSR
(HEK-CaSR) or empty vector (HEK-0, negative control) were
generatedand cultured as described previously (42). All cells
tested negativefor mycoplasma.
Mouse ASM cells. Cells were obtained using previously
describedtechniques (43). Passage 1 to 4 cells were serum-starved
for 24 hoursbefore experimentation.
Ca2+i imaging. Techniques using the ratiometric Ca2+
indicator
fura-2 AM have been previously described (25, 41). An inverted
micro-scope (Olympus IX71) and fluorescence source (Xenon arc or
LED)along with rapid perfusion system was used to alter [Ca2+]o (1
to 5 mM),add agonists (ACh, histamine) and Gd3+ (100 mM to 1 mM),
or addthe polycations ECP (10 mg/ml), PLA (300 mM), or spermine (1
mM).During experimentation requiring different [Ca2+]o, these
changes weremade ~30 min before experiment (but after dye loading
to ensure noconfounding effects of Ca2+o on CaSR or on the loading
per se). Wherestated, cells were incubated with calcilytics
(NPS89636, NPS2143, orCalhex 231) for 20 min.
Phospho-Akt, p38MAPK, and phospho-ERK cell signaling. Hu-manASM
cells isolated from two healthy subjects (n = 17 to 19
technicalrepeats) were passaged up to 10 times and plated for
phosphorylationexperiments. Cells were exposed to 0.5 mM Ca2+o
(control), 5 mM Ca
2+o,
or 5 mMCa2+o in the presence of NPS2143 (1 mM), and experiments
werecarried out and as described previously (44).
Protein analysis. Standard SDS–polyacrylamide gel
electropho-resis with 4 to 15% gels and polyvinylidene difluoride
membraneswere used with protein detection using far-red (LI-COR
Odyssey XL)or horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary
antibodies. CaSRprotein expression was normalized to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate de-hydrogenase (GAPDH).
Ex vivo studiesForce measurements in intralobular bronchi.
Second- to third-
order intralobular bronchial rings (2 mm in length) were
isolated fromthe left lobe, cleaned, and mounted in a wire myograph
(610M, DMT)for measurement of isometric force as described
previously (45) at apassive tension of 2 mN. For the nonpaired
experiments (WT versusKO), the data were normalized to
themeanmaximum forWT,whereasfor the paired experiments (control
versus treatedwith spermine or high[Ca2+]o), each data point was
normalized to the maximum of its owncontrol. To obtain the spermine
concentration-response curve, bronchi
nceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 8
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
were first precontracted with ACh to achieve about 50% of
maximaltone, and then rising concentrations of spermine were added
to thebath. The averaged data points of each set were fitted with
sigmoidaldose-response curve, variable slope (ACh), or second-order
polynomialcurve (spermine).
Precision-cut lung slices. Samples were prepared as previously
de-scribed (46). Intralobular bronchi were identified under a
lightmicroscope(Nikon Diaphot) and imaged during bronchoconstrictor
stimula-tion. Bronchial lumen areas were measured with ImageJ. Tone
wasestablished using 1 mM ACh, and the effects of polyamine
spermine(300 mM) were determined in the absence and presence of
calcilyticNPS89636 (300 nM).
Laser capture microdissection and qRT-PCR. Air-inflated
lungsfrom control and MA-challenged cohort of mice were rapidly
frozenunder ribonuclease-free conditions (47). Samples were
cryosectioned,and total RNA was isolated as described previously
(47). CaSR mRNAwas standardized against ribosomal protein S16 mRNA
(DCt). Indi-vidual DCt values were standardized against themean DCt
of the con-trol group (nonasthmatic humans and control mice, DDCt)
on whichstatistical comparisons were performed. For graphical
representa-tion, the mean fold difference ± SD between the groups
was calcu-lated as 2−DDCt ± SD.
Immunofluorescence. Standard techniques were applied to
cryo-sections of paraformaldehyde-fixed biopsies from human lung
andvibratome-cut, paraformaldehyde postfixedmurine lung slices. A
TCS-SP2 AOBS confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica) was used
forimage acquisition.
In vivo studiesMeasurements of airway resistance (RL). RL was
measured by
flexiVent (SCIREQ) under pentobarbital anesthesia and
pancuroniumparalysis using established techniques (47, 48). In
select cases, animalswere prenebulized with the CaSR-positive
(R568; 1 mM) and/or CaSR-negative (NPS2143; 1 mM) allosteric
modulators (Tocris) 10min beforeMCh challenge.
MAmodel. C57/Bl6mice received daily intranasalmixture of 10
mgofOVA and extracts fromAlternaria,Aspergillus,
andDermatophagoides(house dust mite) for 4 weeks (Greer Labs), each
dose in 50 ml ofphosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Control mice
received intranasal PBS.Animals were analyzed 24 hours after the
last sensitization.
Whole-body plethysmography. Noninvasive barometric
plethys-mography (Buxco Research Systems) was carried out in
unrestrained,conscious mice as described previously (31). After
establishment ofbaseline enhanced pause (Penh) (49), standard
nebulized MCh chal-lenge was performed (0.1 to 100 mg/ml in saline;
3-min recordingper dose; PulmoStar nebulizer, Sunrise Medical), and
Penh values werecalculated and expressed as percentage change
(DPenh, %). Althoughthe physiological data provided by a Penh-based
approach differ fromthose using the forced oscillation technique of
the flexiVent system, thenoninvasive approach allowed for
longitudinal measurements ofbaseline and chronic drug effects in
the same animals (as below).
Polycation-induced AHR. Twenty-fourhours after
baselinemeasure-ments of Penh with MCh challenge, mice were exposed
to aerosolizedPLA (3mM),NPS89636 (3mM),PLA+NPS89636, or vehicle
[0.3% (v/v)dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)] for 1hour, andMChchallengewas
repeated.For experiments with PLA + NPS89636 or vehicle, mice were
pretreatedfor 30minwithNPS89636 (or vehicle) and then
cotreatedwithPLA.Micewere allowed to recover for 1 week between
each set of experiments. Sep-
www.Scie
arately, naïve animals were exposed to nebulizedNPS89636, and 0,
4, and24 hours later, the blood was collected and analyzed for
serum Ca2+.
OVA-induced AHR. MaleBalbCmicewere sensitized on days 0 and5 by
intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg ofOVApermouse and 50mg
ofaluminum hydroxide per mouse in PBS. Thirteen days after the
finalinjection, Penh was recorded during MCh challenge. The next
day,mice were challenged twice with 0.5% nebulizedOVA (in PBS, w/v)
andnebulized NPS89636 (3 mM, or 0.03% DMSO vehicle) by inhalation,4
hours apart. Twenty-nine hours after the first OVA inhalation,
Penhwas again recorded during MCh challenge.
BALF analysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed after the
ter-minal experiment, cells were isolated byCytoSpin centrifugation
(ThermoScientific), and total and differential cell counts were
performed afterLeishman’s staining. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (R&D) andECP (Aviscera Bioscience Inc.)measurementswere
performed accordingto the manufacturer’s instructions.
Materials and antibodiesNPS89636was a gift
fromNPSPharmaceuticals Inc.NPS2143 andCalhex231 were purchased from
Tocris. All other chemicals were purchasedfrom Sigma-Aldrich,
unless otherwise stated. Primary antibodies usedwere as follows:
anti-SM22a (Abcam); anti-CaSR (AnaSpec or Abcam);and
anti–phospho-ERK, anti–phospho-Akt, and anti-p38 MAPK
(CellSignaling). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: Alexa
Fluor 488,Alexa Fluor 594, or Alexa Fluor 647 (Life Technologies).
Nuclei werecounterstained using Hoechst. Omission of the primary
antibodiesacted as negative control.
StatisticsStatistical significance was determined usingGraphPad
Prism 6 software.Student’s two-sided, unpaired, or paired t test
was used to compare agroup of two data sets; one- or two-way ANOVA
with Bonferronipost hoc test, or nonparametric (Friedman) with Dunn
post hoc test, asstated in the figure legends, was used to compare
three ormore data sets.Where applicable, statistical comparisons
were made between nonnor-malized data groups, but normalized data
are presented in the figures.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
www.sciencetranslationalmedicine.org/cgi/content/full/7/284/284ra60/DC1Materials
and MethodsFig. S1. Negative controls and original Western blots
for Fig. 1.Fig. S2. Polycations increase [Ca2+]i by acting on the
human CaSR.Fig. S3. Calcilytics prevent CaSR activation in human
asthmatic ASM.Fig. S4. Technical replicates of data presented in
Fig. 2E and summarized in Fig. 2F.Fig. S5. Phenotypic
characterization of the SM22aCaSR∆flox/∆flox mouse.Fig. S6.
Validation of the MA asthma model.Fig. S7. CaSR expression in human
eosinophils.Database S1. Source data for Figs. 1 to 5 and figs. S1
to S5 (provided as Excel file).Reference (50)
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. W. W. Busse, The relationship of airway hyperresponsiveness
and airway inflammation:Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: Its
measurement and clinical significance. Chest138, 4S–10S (2010).
2. D. Y. Koller, G. Halmerbauer, T. Frischer, B. Roithner,
Assessment of eosinophil granuleproteins in various body fluids: Is
there a relation to clinical variables in childhood asthma?Clin.
Exp. Allergy 29, 786–793 (1999).
nceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 9
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT by guest on June 5,
2021
http://stm.sciencem
ag.org/D
ownloaded from
3. K. Lonnkvist, C. Hellman, J. Lundahl, G. Hallden, G. Hedlin,
Eosinophil markers in blood, serum,and urine for monitoring the
clinical course in childhood asthma: Impact of budesonidetreatment
and withdrawal. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 107, 812–817 (2001).
4. M. Kurosawa, Y. Shimizu, H. Tsukagoshi, M. Ueki, Elevated
levels of peripheral-blood, nat-urally occurring aliphatic
polyamines in bronchial asthmatic patients with active symp-toms.
Allergy 47, 638–643 (1992).
5. M. L. North, H. Grasemann, N. Khanna, M. D. Inman, G. M.
Gauvreau, J. A. Scott, Increasedornithine-derived polyamines cause
airway hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model ofasthma. Am. J.
Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 48, 694–702 (2013).
6. M. L. Bartoli, E. Bacci, S. Carnevali, S. Cianchetti, F. L.
Dente, A. Di Franco, D. Giannini, M. Taccola,B. Vagaggini, P. L.
Paggiaro, Clinical assessment of asthma severity partially
corresponds tosputum eosinophilic airway inflammation. Respir. Med.
98, 184–193 (2004).
7. P. G. Gibson, K. L. Woolley, K. Carty, K. Murree-Allen, N.
Saltos, Induced sputum eosinophilcationic protein (ECP) measurement
in asthma and chronic obstructive airway disease(COAD). Clin. Exp.
Allergy 28, 1081–1088 (1998).
8. S. Pegorier, L. A. Wagner, G. J. Gleich, M. Pretolani,
Eosinophil-derived cationic proteinsactivate the synthesis of
remodeling factors by airway epithelial cells. J. Immunol.
177,4861–4869 (2006).
9. A. J. Coyle, S. J. Ackerman, C. G. Irvin, Cationic proteins
induce airway hyperresponsivenessdependent on charge interactions.
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 147, 896–900 (1993).
10. T. Homma, J. H. Bates, C. G. Irvin, Airway
hyperresponsiveness induced by cationic proteinsin vivo: Site of
action. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 289, L413–L418
(2005).
11. H. Meurs, H. Maarsingh, J. Zaagsma, Arginase and asthma:
Novel insights into nitric oxidehomeostasis and airway
hyperresponsiveness. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24, 450–455 (2003).
12. M. Zhang, T. Caragine, H. Wang, P. S. Cohen, G. Botchkina,
K. Soda, M. Bianchi, P. Ulrich,A. Cerami, B. Sherry, K. J. Tracey,
Spermine inhibits proinflammatory cytokine synthesis inhuman
mononuclear cells: A counterregulatory mechanism that restrains the
immune re-sponse. J. Exp. Med. 185, 1759–1768 (1997).
13. H. Jones, W. Paul, C. P. Page, A comparison of allergen and
polycation induced cutaneousresponses in the rabbit. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 133, 1181–1189 (2001).
14. E. M. Brown, G. Gamba, D. Riccardi, M. Lombardi, R. Butters,
O. Kifor, A. Sun, M. A. Hediger,J. Lytton, S. C. Hebert, Cloning
and characterization of an extracellular Ca2+-sensing recep-tor
from bovine parathyroid. Nature 366, 575–580 (1993).
15. E. F. Nemeth, D. Shoback, Calcimimetic and calcilytic drugs
for treating bone and mineral-related disorders. Best Pract. Res.
Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 27, 373–384 (2013).
16. D. Riccardi, P. J. Kemp, The calcium-sensing receptor beyond
extracellular calcium ho-meostasis: Conception, development, adult
physiology, and disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol.74, 271–297 (2012).
17. G. S. Lee, N. Subramanian, A. I. Kim, I. Aksentijevich, R.
Goldbach-Mansky, D. B. Sacks, R. N. Germain,D. L. Kastner, J. J.
Chae, The calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3
inflammasomethrough Ca2+ and cAMP. Nature 492, 123–127 (2012).
18. M. Rossol, M. Pierer, N. Raulien, D. Quandt, U. Meusch, K.
Rothe, K. Schubert, T. Schoneberg,M. Schaefer, U. Krugel, S.
Smajilovic, H. Brauner-Osborne, C. Baerwald, U. Wagner,
Extra-cellular Ca2+ is a danger signal activating the NLRP3
inflammasome through G protein-coupled calcium sensing receptors.
Nat. Commun. 3, 1329 (2012).
19. J. Paccou, C. Boudot, C. Renard, S. Liabeuf, S. Kamel, P.
Fardellone, Z. Massy, M. Brazier,R. Mentaverri, Total
calcium-sensing receptor expression in circulating monocytes is
increasedin rheumatoid arthritis patients with severe coronary
artery calcification. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16,412 (2014).
20. K. Mahn, O. O. Ojo, G. Chadwick, P. I. Aaronson, J. P. Ward,
T. H. Lee, Ca2+ homeostasis and struc-tural and functional
remodelling of airway smooth muscle in asthma. Thorax 65, 547–552
(2010).
21. T. Koopmans, V. Anaparti, I. Castro-Piedras, P. Yarova, N.
Irechukwu, C. Nelson, J. Perez-Zoghbi,X. Tan, J. P. Ward, D. B.
Wright, Ca2+ handling and sensitivity in airway smooth muscle:
Emergingconcepts for mechanistic understanding and therapeutic
targeting. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 29,108–120 (2014).
22. U. Bachrach, Metabolism and function of spermine and related
polyamines. Annu. Rev.Microbiol. 24, 109–134 (1970).
23. P. McCann, Inhibition of Polyamine Metabolism: Biological
Significance and Basis for NewTherapies (Academic Press, Orlando,
FL, 1987).
24. S. Motojima, E. Frigas, D. A. Loegering, G. J. Gleich,
Toxicity of eosinophil cationic proteinsfor guinea pig tracheal
epithelium in vitro. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 139, 801–805 (1989).
25. K. Mahn, S. J. Hirst, S. Ying, M. R. Holt, P. Lavender, O.
O. Ojo, L. Siew, D. E. Simcock, C. G. McVicker,V. Kanabar, V. A.
Snetkov, B. J. O’Connor, C. Karner, D. J. Cousins, P. Macedo, K. F.
Chung,C. J. Corrigan, J. P. Ward, T. H. Lee, Diminished
sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase(SERCA) expression
contributes to airway remodelling in bronchial asthma. Proc.
Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10775–10780 (2009).
26. C. Page, M. Cazzola, Bifunctional drugs for the treatment of
asthma and chronic obstruc-tive pulmonary disease. Eur. Respir. J.
44, 475–482 (2014).
27. J. K. Burgess, J. H. Lee, Q. Ge, E. E. Ramsay, M. H.
Poniris, J. Parmentier, M. Roth, P. R. Johnson,N. H. Hunt, J. L.
Black, A. J. Ammit, Dual ERK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
pathways controlairway smooth muscle proliferation: Differences in
asthma. J. Cell. Physiol. 216, 673–679 (2008).
www.Scien
28. J. J. Lepore, L. Cheng, M. Min Lu, P. A. Mericko, E. E.
Morrisey, M. S. Parmacek, High-efficiencysomatic mutagenesis in
smooth muscle cells and cardiac myocytes in SM22a-Cre
transgenicmice. Genesis 41, 179–184 (2005).
29. W. Chang, C. Tu, T.-H. Chen, D. Bikle, D. Shoback, The
extracellular calcium-sensing recep-tor (CaSR) is a critical
modulator of skeletal development. Sci. Signal. 1, ra1 (2008).
30. M. Lomask, Further exploration of the Penh parameter. Exp.
Toxicol. Pathol. 57 (Suppl. 2),13–20 (2006).
31. S. Fernandez-Rodriguez, K. J. Broadley, W. R. Ford, E. J.
Kidd, Increased muscarinic receptoractivity of airway smooth muscle
isolated from a mouse model of allergic asthma. Pulm.Pharmacol.
Ther. 23, 300–307 (2010).
32. I. T. Olszak, M. C. Poznansky, R. H. Evans, D. Olson, C.
Kos, M. R. Pollak, E. M. Brown, D. T. Scadden,Extracellular calcium
elicits a chemokinetic response from monocytes in vitro and in
vivo. J. Clin.Invest. 105, 1299–1305 (2000).
33. A. D. Conigrave, D. T. Ward, Calcium-sensing receptor
(CaSR): Pharmacological propertiesand signaling pathways. Best
Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 27, 315–331 (2013).
34. M. E. Handlogten, N. Shiraishi, H. Awata, C. Huang, R. T.
Miller, Extracellular Ca2+-sensingreceptor is a promiscuous
divalent cation sensor that responds to lead. Am. J. Physiol.Renal
Physiol. 279, F1083–F1091 (2000).
35. P. D. Ngo, R. J. MacLeod, V. Mukkada, R. Turki, G. T.
Furuta, Epithelial calcium-sensing re-ceptor activation by
eosinophil granule protein analog stimulates collagen matrix
contrac-tion. Pediatr. Res. 73, 414–419 (2013).
36. S. L. Davies, C. E. Gibbons, T. Vizard, D. T. Ward,
Ca2+-sensing receptor induces Rho kinase-mediated actin stress
fiber assembly and altered cell morphology, but not in response
toaromatic amino acids. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290,
C1543–C1551 (2006).
37. F. Hoffmeyer, K. Sucker, C. Monse, H. Berresheim, B.
Jettkant, N. Rosenkranz, T. Bruning, J. Bunger,Different patterns
in changes of exhaled breath condensate pH and exhaled nitric oxide
afterozone exposure. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 834, 39–47 (2015).
38. G. H. Wan, D. C. Yan, T. H. Tung, C. S. Tang, C. H. Liu,
Seasonal changes in endotoxinexposure and its relationship to
exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate pHlevels in
atopic and healthy children. PLOS One 8, e66785 (2013).
39. L. A. Fitzpatrick, C. E. Dabrowski, G. Cicconetti, D. N.
Gordon, T. Fuerst, K. Engelke, H. K. Genant,Ronacaleret, a
calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, increases trabecular but not
cortical bonein postmenopausal women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27,
255–262 (2012).
40. S. E. Wenzel, Asthma phenotypes: The evolution from clinical
to molecular approaches.Nat. Med. 18, 716–725 (2012).
41. Y. S. Prakash, A. Iyanoye, B. Ay, C. B. Mantilla, C. M.
Pabelick, Neurotrophin effects on in-tracellular Ca2+ and force in
airway smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.291,
L447–L456 (2006).
42. D. T. Ward, M. Z. Mughal, M. Ranieri, M. M. Dvorak-Ewell, G.
Valenti, D. Riccardi, Molecularand clinical analysis of a neonatal
severe hyperparathyroidism case caused by a stop mu-tation in the
calcium-sensing receptor extracellular domain representing in
effect a human‘knockout’. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 169, K1–K7
(2013).
43. D. W. McGraw, K. M. Fogel, S. Kong, A. A. Litonjua, E. G.
Kranias, B. J. Aronow, S. B. Liggett,Transcriptional response to
persistent b2-adrenergic receptor signaling reveals regulationof
phospholamban, which alters airway contractility. Physiol. Genomics
27, 171–177 (2006).
44. W. D. McCormick, R. Atkinson-Dell, K. L. Campion, H. C. Mun,
A. D. Conigrave, D. T. Ward,Increased receptor stimulation elicits
differential calcium-sensing receptorT888 dephos-phorylation. J.
Biol. Chem. 285, 14170–14177 (2010).
45. J. Q. Liu, D. Yang, R. J. Folz, A novel bronchial ring
bioassay for the evaluation of small airwaysmooth muscle function
in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 291, L281–L288
(2006).
46. M. J. Sanderson, Exploring lung physiology in health and
disease with lung slices. Pulm.Pharmacol. Ther. 24, 452–465
(2011).
47. B. Aravamudan, S. K. VanOosten, L. W. Meuchel, P. Vohra, M.
Thompson, G. C. Sieck, Y. S. Prakash,C. M. Pabelick, Caveolin-1
knockout mice exhibit airway hyperreactivity. Am. J. Physiol. Lung
Cell.Mol. Physiol. 303, L669–L681 (2012).
48. K. H. Shalaby, L. G. Gold, T. F. Schuessler, J. G. Martin,
A. Robichaud, Combined forcedoscillation and forced expiration
measurements in mice for the assessment of airway
hy-perresponsiveness. Respir. Res. 11, 82 (2010).
49. E. Hamelmann, J. Schwarze, K. Takeda, A. Oshiba, G. L.
Larsen, C. G. Irvin, E. W. Gelfand,Noninvasive measurement of
airway responsiveness in allergic mice using
barometricplethysmography. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 156,
766–775 (1997).
50. G. Hillas, K. Kostikas, K. Mantzouranis, V. Bessa, K.
Kontogianni, G. Papadaki, S. Papiris, M. Alchanatis,S. Loukides, P.
Bakakos, Exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate pH as
predictors ofsputum cell counts in optimally treated asthmatic
smokers. Respirology 16, 811–818 (2011).
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge D. H. Edwards for access to wire
myography equipment,D.Wright for his helpwith humanASM cells, D.
Richards for the human eosinophil cytospins, andE. F. Nemeth for
the gift of NPS89636 and helpful discussions. Funding: This workwas
supported bygrants fromAsthmaUK (11/056, to C.J.C., J.P.T.W., D.R.,
and P.J.K.), the Cardiff Partnership Fund (toD.R., P.J.K., E.J.K.,
and W.R.F.), a Marie Curie Initial Training Network “Multifaceted
CaSR” (to D.R. andP.J.K.), the Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council (BB/D01591X to D.R. and P.J.K.),
ceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 10
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
R E S EARCH ART I C L E
CORRECTED 27 APRIL 2015; SEE FULL TEXT
and the U.S. NIH [HL056470, HL088029 (to Y.S.P.), and HL090595
(to C.M.P.)]. We also acknowledgesupport from the Department of
Health via the National Institute for Health Research
Comprehen-sive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s &
King’s College London and King’s College HospitalNHS Foundation
Trust.Author contributions: P.L.Y., A.L.S., V.S., R.D.B., M.A.T.,
A.P.P.L., M.F., B.A., S.C.B.,M.S., T.D., S.Y., Z.C., K.R.,
M.E.B.K., and D.T.W. performed the experiments. W.C. generated the
SM22aLoxP CaSR mice. Y.S.P., H.K., P.L.Y., P.J.K., and D.R.
designed and analyzed the experiments and per-formed the
statistical analyses. E.J.K., W.R.F., and K.J.B. developed the
OVA-sensitized mouse asthmamodel. C.M.P. developed the MA mouse
asthma model. C.J.C., J.P.T.W., P.J.K., Y.S.P., P.L.Y., and
D.R.wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: D.R., P.J.K.,
C.J.C., and J.P.T.W. are co-inventors on apatent (WO2014049351)
claiming the use of CaSR antagonists for the treatment of
inflammatorylung disorders. The other authors declare that they
have no competing interests.
www.Scien
Submitted 7 November 2014Accepted 24 February 2015Published 22
April 201510.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0282
Citation: P. L. Yarova, A. L. Stewart, V. Sathish, R. D. Britt
Jr., M. A. Thompson, A. P. P. Lowe,M. Freeman, B. Aravamudan, H.
Kita, S. C. Brennan, M. Schepelmann, T. Davies, S. Yung,Z.
Cholisoh, E. J. Kidd, W. R. Ford, K. J. Broadley, K. Rietdorf, W.
Chang, M. E. Bin Khayat,D. T. Ward, C. J. Corrigan, J. P. T. Ward,
P. J. Kemp, C. M. Pabelick, Y. S. Prakash, D.
Riccardi,Calcium-sensing receptor antagonists abrogate airway
hyperresponsiveness and inflammationin allergic asthma. Sci.
Transl. Med. 7, 284ra60 (2015).
ceTranslationalMedicine.org 22 April 2015 Vol 7 Issue 284
284ra60 11
by guest on June 5, 2021http://stm
.sciencemag.org/
Dow
nloaded from
http://stm.sciencemag.org/
-
inflammation in allergic asthmaCalcium-sensing receptor
antagonists abrogate airway hyperresponsiveness and
Pabelick, Y. S. Prakash and Daniela RiccardiChang, Mohd E. Bin
Khayat, Donald T. Ward, Christopher J. Corrigan, Jeremy P. T. Ward,
Paul J. Kemp, Christina M. Davies, Sun Yung, Zakky Cholisoh, Emma
J. Kidd, William R. Ford, Kenneth J. Broadley, Katja Rietdorf,
WenhanP. Lowe, Michelle Freeman, Bharathi Aravamudan, Hirohito
Kita, Sarah C. Brennan, Martin Schepelmann, Thomas Polina L.
Yarova, Alecia L. Stewart, Venkatachalem Sathish, Rodney D. Britt ,
Jr., Michael A. Thompson, Alexander P.
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0282, 284ra60284ra60.7Sci Transl
Med
vivo, supporting clinical testing of these drugs for
asthmatics.can prevent these effects both in vitro and in−−CaSR
antagonists−−airway hyperreactivity. What's more, calcilytics
model of allergic asthma. Indeed, extracellular calcium and
other asthma-associated activators of CaSR increased Asthmatic
patients express higher levels of CaSR in their airways than do
healthy individuals, as does a mouse
extracellular calcium can activate airway smooth muscle cells
through the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR). contribute to
inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in allergic asthma.
They show that elevated
. now show that extracellular calcium mayet alCalcium may help
to build strong bones. However, Yarova Calcilytics may help
asthmatics breathe easier
ARTICLE TOOLS
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/284/284ra60
MATERIALSSUPPLEMENTARY
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2015/04/20/7.284.284ra60.DC1
CONTENTRELATED
http://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/391/ra84.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/405/ra122.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/10/475/eaai8583.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/307/307ra152.fullhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/349/6252/1106.fullhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/349/6252/1034.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/301/301ra129.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/301/301fs33.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/288/288ed5.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/374/ec112.abstracthttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/3/143/re7.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/5/174/174ra26.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/6/256/256ra134.full
REFERENCES
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/284/284ra60#BIBLThis article
cites 49 articles, 8 of which you can access for free
PERMISSIONS
http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the
registered trademark of AAAS. is aScience Translational
MedicineScience, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The
title
(ISSN 1946-6242) is published by the American Association for
the Advancement ofScience Translational Medicine
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of
Science
by guest on June 5, 2021http://stm
.sciencemag.org/
Dow
nloaded from
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/284/284ra60http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2015/04/20/7.284.284ra60.DC1http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/6/256/256ra134.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/5/174/174ra26.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/3/143/re7.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/374/ec112.abstracthttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/288/288ed5.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/301/301fs33.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/301/301ra129.fullhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/349/6252/1034.fullhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/349/6252/1106.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/7/307/307ra152.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/10/475/eaai8583.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/405/ra122.fullhttp://stke.sciencemag.org/content/sigtrans/8/391/ra84.fullhttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/284/284ra60#BIBLhttp://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissionshttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/terms-servicehttp://stm.sciencemag.org/