By By Dr. Solomon Dr. Solomon Mengestu Mengestu Addisu Abera Addisu Abera Solomon Abeyi Solomon Abeyi Fantahun Dereje Fantahun Dereje May, 2012 May, 2012 EIAR EIAR BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA AREAS AREAS
22
Embed
By Dr. Solomon Mengestu Addisu Abera Solomon Abeyi Fantahun Dereje May, 2012 EIARBy Dr. Solomon Mengestu Addisu Abera Solomon Abeyi Fantahun Dereje May,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA AREAS BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA AREAS BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA AREAS BEEF AND FEED VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN ADAMA AREAS
IntroductionAdama Area:
One of the major beef animal source for the domestic markets of Adama-Addis Ababa areas
Its proximity to the large consumer base in Addis Ababa, Farmers of the area have got Long tradition in Fattening cattle It is an important means of livelihood for the farmers, In the study villages, cattle are the dominant livestock species
having multiple functions i.e. traction, income source Feed scarcity is a major problem that limits animal
productivity, Improvement in livestock productivity can be achieved by
alleviating feed constraints,
Scope & Objectives
The scope of the study is limited to small scale beef producers.
The major objective of this study is to select the best bet Feed technologies
1.Describe and map the core functions and major actors involved and their market channels in each value chain,
2.Identifying major constraints and opportunities in each value chain,
3.Testing and further refining of the VCA tool for wider scale use in the future,
MethodologySampling procedures:
Adama was selected
•Two kebeles based on their proximity to input & output market were purposively selected with wereda staff thus,
•The two villages were kechema & Kuriftu wenji
•A total of 40 producers participated
Source of data•Secondary data and review of relevant literatures were undertaken,
•PRA was conducted with producers for production and marketing issues,
•A focused group discussions using a checklist prepared for this purpose.
Net margin (Birr/head) 1250 800 1950 2050 1250 1150 1950
Producer's share of final price (%) 80 85 66.7 66.7 72.7 71.4 72.2
Costs and margins of actors involved in the Beef marketing channel and the Share of producers from final price
*Export Abattoirs , in this case they are producing for domestic consumption , i.e . For supermarkets, hotels, Universities & institutions.
Costs and margins of actors involved in a market channel selling crop residue (Teff straw) and concentrate to users
Price per One donkey cart (10 Baler) Producers Small trader/userSelling price (Birr/10baller) 120 200Marketing cost 30Marketing margin 80Net margin 50Producer's share of final price (%) 60
Price per One quintal of (concentrate) straw Producers Small trader/userSelling price (Birr/10baller) 240 310Marketing cost 30Marketing margin 70Net margin 40Producer's share of final price (%) 77.41
Crop residue (Teff straw)
Concentrate
I. Constraints along the Beef value chain
Input Supply•Shortage of feed supply (quantity & Quality)•Lack of awareness about feed formulation•Inefficient vet services & supply of vet drug•Insufficient provision of credit and problematic collateral arrangementsProduction•High feed cost & low conversion ratio of older animals•Lack of skill and knowledge with regard to profitable beef productionProcessing•Low level technology take up,•Poor sanitary practices•Low level of technical skill & knowledge of the staff
Marketing
•High cost of sell and unfair distribution of the food item
•High cost of marketing margin to end actors in the chain
•Lack of chilling facilities (most of the traders) commodities
• Few types of salable commodities at retail shelf
• Fraudulent brokerage in the market places
Consumption
•Presence of fraudulent slaughter and weak regulatory services (Road side slaughter, back yard slaughter
•Long fasting days of the Orthodox Christian followers
•Lack of consumers’ knowledge on eating preference (as raw meat)
II. Constraints in feed value chainInput Supply
•Land shortage•Shortage of seed and other planting materials•Lack of training on forage production and pasture management•Shortage of raw materials for agro-industries and feed processing plantsProduction
•Low productivity of pasture; Lack of forage production skill•In-effcient feed preservation practicesProcessing
•Few processing plants that are congested around Addis•Most of them operate under their installed capacity•No quality control on feed
Cont’dMarketing
•Seasonality in availability and price of feed
•High transportation costs
•Absence of feed quality control in the market
•Few actors monopolizing the concentrate feed market
Consumption
•High feed price & Shortage of supply
•Lack of awareness on improved feeding
•High adulteration
•High transportation cost
•Low level of understanding of feed quality by consumers
Opportunities identified
• High number of cattle population
• An increasingly high demand for beef meat and animal feed in local markets
• High population growth with better income and demand for better quality food
• Expanding livestock industry with high demand for better quality feed resources
Lessons learned
Beef and feed production constraints in the study area are identified.
Production intervention should focus to solve constraints indicated in
the areas of the 5 core functions (input supply, production,
processing, marketing and Consumption)
Major beef and feed market channels identified by this study.