Top Banner
James Thompson, Business Process Consultant Supply Chain Strategy and Technology Business Process Group Field Ticket Project Overview June 9, 2016 1
48

Business Process Group Field Ticket Project Overview - … · Business Process Group Field Ticket Project Overview ... Schlumberger: Supplier Price Issues and Complex ... Source:

Apr 07, 2018

Download

Documents

NguyenMinh
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • James Thompson, Business Process ConsultantSupply Chain Strategy and Technology

    Business Process GroupField Ticket Project Overview

    June 9, 20161

  • Agenda

    Field Ticket Overview Key Finding and Recommendations Next Steps ConocoPhillips Initiatives

    2

  • Field Ticket Project Overview

  • Field Ticket Project Problem Statement

    Manual, paper-based and legacy processes

    Massive amounts of transactional volumes exchange

    Supplier spends excessive time driving to/from field offices for signatures

    Overpayment/coding errors (joint venture audit issues, and adjustments)

    Lack of real-time knowledge of activities or expenditures

    4

  • Field Ticket Current State (Paper Delivery)

  • What do 15,000 tickets look like? You want me to find ticket #675321?

    6

    https://spcl48.cop.net/dept/cafdmpm/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=/sites/FDMprojects/Shared%20Documents/2013_Projects/FDM201302_Run_Ticket_Scanning/Pics/Videos&View=%7BB97589B7-E5CA-4FCA-BA7A-933A3BA43D13%7D

  • Goal of Project

    Gain community adoption of the PIDX Field Ticket Schema by providing a best practice overview of the field ticket process for operators and suppliers.

    This would allow the ability to successfully integrate field ticket data points into the standard PIDX Field Ticket Schema, along with driving technology in the industry.

    Project started in January 2016

    7

  • Supplier\Operator\Marketplace Collaboration

    6/24/20168

    Best Practice Area Finding Business Group Contact

    Process Flow - Upfront POs John Stukes - OFS Portal Amy Nguyen - OFS Portal

    Process Flow - Via Call-Off John Stukes - OFS Portal Amy Nguyen - OFS Portal

    Invoice Coding ErrorsElena Dumitrascu - CortexBryan Fusilier - Aristotle's Alexander'sDarren Ebanks - Schlumberger

    Field Ticket Integration with Drilling Software Christopher Hebert - (Aristotle's Alexander's)

    Unmanned Location Field TicketsJean-Pierre Foehn - AmaltoBryan Pederson - AmaltoRick Conner - Schlumberger

    Supplier Price Issues and Complex ServicesJohn Stukes - OFS Portal Amy Nguyen - OFS PortalTerry Thomas/Darrin Eubanks - Schlumberger

    Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Field Ticket Participating Companies

    6/24/20169 Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Key Finding and Recommendations

    June 24, 2016

  • Field Ticket Project Key Finding

    Research reveals disjointed and manual processes Continues to be a manual paper process

    Leads to increase cycle time for payment to suppliers Leads delays of expenses results on operators financials

    Service Call-offs continues to be the standard process Data input in drilling software continues to manual Field personnel not willing to adapt to technology Purchase Order Use is limited

    Results in an increase of invoice coding errors Increase in invoice and field ticket processing time

    June 24, 201611 Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Field Ticket Project Recommendations

    Leverage Technology B2B Collaboration

    Increase purchase order use Supplier\Operator Price Sheet Operator Coding Data Exchange. i.e. AFE, Project Number, Well

    description, etc. Mobility Internet of Things, iOT

    Reduce and/or eliminate paper field ticket Operators educate field personnel the importance of proper coding

    June 24, 201612 Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Field Ticket Next Steps

    June 24, 2016

  • Next Steps

    May to December 2016

    Phase 2 Developed guidance on the following challenges identified in phase 1 and measure results.

    Socialize PIDX Activities

    Monitor Suppliers/Operators/Marketplace Collaborations

    Operator \ Supplier Data Exchange (POs, Coding Cheat Sheet) Generic end to end process flow Capture field ticket data fields

    Drilling Software Field Ticket Integration Generic end to end process flow Capture field data fields

    Technology Opportunities Explore Mobility Explore iOT solutions

    June 24, 201614

  • ConocoPhillips Initiatives

    June 24, 2016

  • Overview

    16

    Coding Exchange \Validation

    Drilling Software

    Integration

    Supplier Marketplace Collaboration

    Procurement Automation

    Explore Paperless

    Field Ticket

    Close Missing Ticket Gap Reduce Coding Errors Reduce trucking cost Validate Volume Delivered or

    Removed Increase Procurement

    Efficiency

  • Data Coding Exchange (To reduce invoice errors)

    17 Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • 800

    600

    200

    Pool

    Field \ Run Ticket Overview

    One data set for all Portal based cloud solution Upfront data checking

    Mobile apps Electronic run tickets Streamlined reconciliations Enhances process controls

  • Electronic Field Ticketing

    19

    ShipXpress

    Sites with Tanks

    Missing Ticket Exception

    SCADA

    HaulRequests

    Tank Haul Prediction

    ToolIOC

    TransporterSystem

    TicketCapture

    AvocetTicketData

    TicketData

    Tickets

    TankLevels

    (SCADA)

    Tank Levels

    End of Month Closing Process

    Tickets

    Destination Facility Ticket Capture

    Tank Levels

    Advantages of Electronic Ticketing Eliminates paper tickets Shared data set for all Streamlined reconciliations Upfront data checking Reliable Timestamp Enhances process controls Reduces replacement ticket churn Enables near-daily processes Visibility of portal-based cloud solution Reduce trucking cost via metrics Mobile apps

    Marketplace Provider

    BI Analytics Missing Tickets

    IInternalDatabas

    e

  • Leveraging IoTs and cloud integration to improve field ticketing

    Service Request

    Field Ticketdata

    CodedField Ticket

    ApprovedField Ticket

    Invoice

    Process:1/ Service request (IoT sensors)2/ Field ticket (mobile)3/ Invoice4/ Payment

    Service Provider

    Producer

    Unmanned location

    Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Questions

    June 24, 2016

  • Appendix (Business Process Meeting)

    June 24, 2016

  • Plan work/ schedule services

    Perform Service(s

    )

    Receive Signed FT w/

    coding

    Confirm FT

    PO = Purchase OrderFT = Field TicketINV = Invoice

    Create PO/

    Request for

    Service

    Confirm Scope

    PIDX XML INV/

    FT data & attachment

    Pay invoice

    Receive Payment

    Update system w/ FT data & validate coding

    Submit INV w/ PO coding data

    elements & signed FT

    Receive data to AP

    Review & App?

    N

    Y

    Re-verify INV

    INV Rate &Price Validation

    Drilling / INV details or line item details

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Purchase Order

    Mar

    ketp

    lace

    If received FT copy, store locally or update internal

    system

    Receive/Pass approved

    INV response

    Receive Respons

    e

    Confirm Scope

    Present FT for job

    confirmation

    On-site Service (FT) Validation

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Review FT

    Supp

    lier

    Ope

    rato

    r

    Receive data to DS

    Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

    Field Ticket Process Flow Overview Purchase Order

  • Plan work/ schedule services

    Perform Service(s

    )

    Receive Signed FT w/

    coding

    Confirm FT

    PO = Purchase OrderFT = Field TicketINV = Invoice

    Call-off/Request

    for Service

    Confirm Scope

    PIDX XML INV/

    FT data & attachment

    Pay invoice

    Receive Payment

    Update system w/ FT data & validate coding

    Submit INV w/ PO coding data

    elements & signed FT

    Receive data to AP

    Review & App?

    N

    Y

    Re-verify INV

    INV Rate &Price Validation

    Drilling / INV details or line item details

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Mar

    ketp

    lace

    If received FT copy, store locally or update internal

    system

    Receive/Pass approved

    INV response

    Receive Respons

    e

    Confirm Scope

    Present FT for job

    confirmation

    On-site Service (FT) Validation

    Man

    ually

    don

    e

    Review FT

    Supp

    lier

    Ope

    rato

    r

    Receive data to DS

    Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

    Field Ticket Process Flow Overview Call-Off

  • Data Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket Process)

    Planning Schedulin

    g

    MK

    Supp

    lier

    Ope

    rato

    r

    Receive data

    elements (.xlsx or

    csv)

    ERP

    Project Mgmt

    Compile data

    Receive Data file

    Convert data to

    PIDX XML

    DE = Data elementsMK = Marketplace (Operator)PIDX XML = previously defined schema if available?

    Send data

    elements file

    DrillingSoftware

    Supplier

    access to MK?

    Y

    N

    Convert data to

    PIDX XML

    Validate data file

    Send PIDX XML to

    Supplier

    Via

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    orM

    anua

    l

    Leverage existing PIDX XML data?

    Leverage existing PIDX XML data?

    Confirm/ Send

    notification

    DataDiscren

    cy?

    N

    Y

    Send PIDX XML to

    Supplier

    Receive confirmatio

    n

    Validate data

    Send notification

  • Data Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket) Process Proposed

    Send fromPlanning

    Scheduling

    MP

    Ope

    rato

    r

    Send data from ERP

    Procurement

    Send data from Project

    Mgmt

    Receive data file

    Send data file

    FT = Field TicketINV = InvoiceMP = Marketplace (OPER)OPER = OperatorRESP = ResponseSUPP = Supplier

    Receive/ Validate data file

    Store data for INV

    validation

    Compile/ map data elements

    Share data w/

    Field & Operation

    Source: PIDX Business Process Group Field Ticket Project

  • Data Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket) Process Proposed

    Proposed list of data elements API# (US) API# equivalent (outside US)? PO# / WO#

    MP/Operator map (cross-reference) all remaining data elements

    AFE Supplier ID Approver Reviewer Contract# or/and OLA# GL Account

    Cost Objects & Activity/Op WBS Element Network Network Activity Cost Center Plant Code

  • Drilling Software Data (sub process) ProposedM

    PSu

    pplie

    rO

    pera

    tor

    Receive/ Send eFT data file

    Receive Signed FT eFT?

    Y

    N DS = Drilling SoftwareeFT = electronic Field TicketMP = Marketplace (OPER)OPER = OperatorSUPP = Supplier

    Create/ Send INV to MP or

    OPER

    Receive eFT data

    Access to MP?

    N

    Send eFT data

    Update DS w/ data

    Y

    Via

    Inte

    grat

    ion

    Job complete

    d

    Store data file

  • Finding and Recommendations

    June 24, 2016

  • Field Ticket Coding ErrorsOpportunities and Challenges

    6/24/201630

  • Opportunity

    Invoice Coding Errors are a problem across the industry. The issue

    causes longer time to pay for Suppliers and inefficient use of time for

    the Operator in the AP department disputing invoices over incorrect

    data.

    By reducing Invoice Coding Errors, Suppliers and Operators can gain

    efficiencies in the invoicing process. Both parties are willing to

    participate in a solution to simplify the process of transferring

    accounting codes across all documents in the transaction. If the issue

    is addressed in the Field Ticket, it corrects itself in the invoicing

    process.

    June 24, 201631

  • Business Value

    Reduce costs of manual validation of accounting codes

    Reduce reworks from Operator AP and Supplier AR

    Reduce Days Sales Outstanding for Suppliers

    Potential early pay discounts for Operator

    Reduce Supplier cost to maintain competitive pricing

    June 24, 201632

  • Challenges to be addressed to succeed

    Effectively share correct accounting codes with Supplier Eliminate hand written data transfer of accounting data

    (stamps, fields on paper Field Ticket, etc.) Proactively insure Supplier has the correct data Establish processes for Suppliers to follow when missing critical

    data Remove the responsibility of maintaining this data from field

    level personnel

    June 24, 201633

  • Field Ticket Integration with Drilling Software

    6/24/201634

  • Opportunity

    Field Ticket data is manually approved and keyed into Drilling Software by Operator Company Reps from paper field tickets

    provided by Suppliers. This is an inefficient and error prone process

    which introduces delays in Safety, Cost, and Performance metrics

    management.

    Supplier Field Ticketing data and approval should be integrated with Operator Drilling Software in near real-time through a PIDX standards

    based schema. This will facilitate the exchange of ticketing data

    between Suppliers and Operators providing operational efficiencies.

    June 24, 201635

  • Business Value

    Reduce costs of manual keying of field ticketing data by Company Reps through data integration

    Near real-time visibility into Field Spend and AFE management Better insights into drilling activities Operational performance improvements Proactively monitor and manage Supplier Operational, Safety, Cost,

    and Performance metrics

    Reduce Supplier manual reporting costs Reduce stand-by charges PIDX standard ticketing interfaces supporting all third parties

    June 24, 201636

  • Challenges to be addressed to succeed

    Map current processes Wells, AFE, supplier, and approval management Capture additional field data beyond field tickets Define coding and costing master data sources Price, Catalog, and Coding validation during import Determine which Company Reps can approve Associate tickets to right Well/AFE/GL after approval Address paper suppliers

    June 24, 201637

  • Unmanned Location Field Tickets

    6/24/201638

  • Challenges to be addressed to succeed

    Getting the field ticket approved Getting the right coding But even more challenging (no company man onsite- large volume of

    transactions in some cases) ID of the well and location could be a problem Service request is based on either: Routine maintenance (fluid hauling) Emergency phone call associated or not to blanket order

    June 24, 201639

  • Challenges to be addressed to succeed

    Getting the field ticket approved Getting the right coding But even more challenging (no company man onsite- large volume of

    transactions in some cases) ID of the well and location could be a problem Service request is based on either: Routine maintenance (fluid hauling) Emergency phone call associated or not to blanket order

    June 24, 201640

  • Challenges to be addressed to succeed

    Getting the field ticket approved Getting the right coding But even more challenging (no company man onsite- large volume of

    transactions in some cases) ID of the well and location could be a problem Service request is based on either: Routine maintenance (fluid hauling) Emergency phone call associated or not to blanket order

    June 24, 201641

  • Improving the process by deploying technology in phases

    Phase 3: devices in the field to capture asset ID NFC, bar code, RFID readers capture asset ID, location and time onsite Coding is automatically generated based on these elements Enrichment of the field ticket and the invoice via a cloud based solution

    Phase 4: IoT devices Service request is triggered directly by the sensors and sent to the service

    company

    June 24, 201642

  • Improving the process by deploying technology in phases

    Phase 1: coding (PO#, AFE #, etc) is transmitted ahead of the job by the operator

    by emails or via a portal Phase 2 : Collaborative Field ticket portal between vendors and

    operators Field ticket is either keyed in or uploaded or B2B transmitted to a

    portal by a vendor then reviewed and coded by the operator

    June 24, 201643

  • The long term vision

    Service Request

    Field Ticketdata

    CodedField Ticket

    ApprovedField Ticket

    Invoice

    Process:1/ Service Request (IoT sensors)2/ Field ticket (mobile)3/ Invoice4/ Payment

    Service Provider

    Producer

    Payment

    Unmanned location

  • Supplier Price Issues and Complex Services

    6/24/201645

  • Supplier Price Challenges & Complex Services

    Invoices get rejected due to wrong price for each line item (system does not check entire invoice and send list of errors at one time)

    Supplier not knowing of price changes until invoices get rejected Operator compares invoice pricing to FT pricing Supplier has no visibility of when operator approves price sheet Zero price items (complex pricing)

    June 24, 201646

  • Next Steps

    Supplier/Operator/Marketplace Collaboration Share Best Practice Success Stories

    Pilot Projects to Measure Efficiency - (May to Dec 16) Explore Technology Options Purchase Orders - (Limit Service or Material) Master Data or Cheat Sheet Exchange Operator Email Alert of Invoice Coding Issues

    June 24, 201647

  • Potential Benefits or Opportunities to Explore

    Tangible Close Missing Ticket Gap Reduce Coding Errors Reduce trucking cost Validate Volume Delivered or Removed Increase Procurement Efficiency

    Touchless process and reduction of coding errors

    In-Tangible Enhance planning and scheduling Metrics to manage haulers (demurrage, mileage, time, etc.) Eliminate deliveries to unauthorized disposals Potential litigation or fines in event of incident Validation of load volumes

    Auto compare SCADA volumes to ticket volumes and create exceptions

    48

    Business Process GroupField Ticket Project OverviewAgendaField Ticket Project OverviewField Ticket Project Problem StatementField Ticket Current State (Paper Delivery)What do 15,000 tickets look like?Goal of ProjectSupplier\Operator\Marketplace CollaborationField Ticket Participating CompaniesKey Finding and RecommendationsField Ticket Project Key FindingField Ticket Project Recommendations Field Ticket Next StepsNext StepsConocoPhillips InitiativesOverview Data Coding Exchange (To reduce invoice errors)Slide Number 18Electronic Field Ticketing Leveraging IoTs and cloud integration to improve field ticketing QuestionsAppendix (Business Process Meeting)Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Data Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket Process)Data Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket) Process ProposedData Elements Validation (Pre-Field Ticket) Process ProposedDrilling Software Data (sub process) ProposedFinding and RecommendationsField Ticket Coding ErrorsOpportunities and ChallengesOpportunityBusiness ValueChallenges to be addressed to succeedField Ticket Integration with Drilling SoftwareOpportunityBusiness ValueChallenges to be addressed to succeedUnmanned Location Field TicketsChallenges to be addressed to succeedChallenges to be addressed to succeedChallenges to be addressed to succeedImproving the process by deploying technology in phases Improving the process by deploying technology in phases The long term visionSupplier Price Issues and Complex ServicesSupplier Price Challenges & Complex Services Next Steps Potential Benefits or Opportunities to Explore