Top Banner
Collaborate to Innovate ?
37

Bug 3 no links

Nov 15, 2014

Download

Design

Mark Hicks

Co-Design Deck shared with BUG talk attendees 9.10.6. Few notes, so best read with accompanying pdf documents.
Accompanied short talk on why co-design with customers is good for large companies, how to get it going and some lessons learned from running co-design sessions.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bug 3   no links

Collaborate to Innovate ?

Page 2: Bug 3   no links

Macro = the business context and imperative

Page 3: Bug 3   no links

Micro = the doing

….….and learning

Page 4: Bug 3   no links

Co-Design is : (for now)

Collaborative product or service development whereby product or service providers and consumers work together to design and specify a service.

*Not* about involving users, or sampling users or observing users – but getting customers to do the work.

Page 5: Bug 3   no links
Page 6: Bug 3   no links

The business context and imperative

Big CompanyNew player New spaceAggressive competitor positioningDigital content field saturatedIt’s about services – but which ?

Page 7: Bug 3   no links

Co-Design is interesting to large companies because they worry about,

• Where to find future growth.

• How to deal with the risk of commoditisation.

• How to innovate from the core.

• How to get connected with new customers, and stay connected with current ones.

Page 8: Bug 3   no links

Why did we bet on this hypothesis being right ?

But why’s it interesting to (service) designers ?

(Turkeys voting for Xmas ?)

IKEA Innovative People Dell Ideastorms BMW Customer Innovation Lab LegoShellProctor & Gamble C&DMuji/Cuusoo

Page 9: Bug 3   no links

Lego has found co-design is a powerful force for change and has now rooted the practice in their company strategy

Lego – iconic and aggressively protective

Till late 90’s online interest, no engagement

Mindstorms changed that :

-educational, geek, niche – but 100K sold

-brick reverse engineered, OS hacked

-lawyers on hold, communities had sprung up

-tolerated under the radar

2003 Lego in crisis – Mindstorm team laid off

2004 Mindstorm engage users in design

2005 approach gains wider acceptance

Now part of corporate strategy, to blur lines between corporate and customer – transform to an eco system.

50 projects in co-design & Cuuso

Page 10: Bug 3   no links

Co-design is the starting point – why so ?

Page 11: Bug 3   no links

How to position co-design ?

(What do you want out of it ?)

Managed Innovation around core product portfolio

Open innovation calls to supplement portfolio

“Proudly developed elsewhere”

More about growing brand capital than portfolio.

Page 12: Bug 3   no links

So you’ve got organisational buy in..

..or your doing it below the radar….(difficult)

Figure how to exploit the work…

Marketing Team

Product Team

Design Team

Legal Team

PR Team

..and start doing it

Page 13: Bug 3   no links

What it would take to set up and run co-design incubators that could contribute usefully to design ?

Specifically : How to organise people ?Who should own the ideas ?How to motivate teams?What do they need to do the job?Will their work be useful ?Can they work remotely ?How far can they go in the design process ?Is there a co-design sweet spot ?

…….doing it

Page 14: Bug 3   no links

First Organise !

Openness

Can anyone join ?

Ownership

Who owns the outcome?

Ownership

Openness

Page 15: Bug 3   no links

• Club of Experts

• Crowd Model

• Coalition of Parties

• Community of Kindred Spirits

Time pressured challenges. expertise, breakthrough ideas. Selection criteria. Chemistry important. Motivated innovative thinkers best collaborators. Active management and openness needed

The power of the crowd.. Anyone is in . The right solution is 'out there'. Online platforms are powerful can propose initiatives, rate and respond to suggestions. Seeding kick-starts the process. Longer than managed approaches. Cost of entry is low for all, the prize can be great and the organiser can cherry pick. eg Cuusoo

Parties team up to share ideas, each bringing a specific asset, knowledge or skill to the group. Technical breakthroughs and the realisation of standards often happen when multiple parties collaborate. Engagement can be super short. Value lies in sharing knowledge, creating common competitive advantage, building trust etc.

The greater good – software and social innovation

Page 16: Bug 3   no links

I’m Going There is a just-in-time marketplace to match up spare transport capacity with needs.

I buy…

I help…

Start with an idea seed posted to a collaborative space.

Page 17: Bug 3   no links

The search for the studio co-design sweet spot was complete

Studio time

vs

Online time

4th

sess

ion

Page 18: Bug 3   no links

The Inspiration Blog

Link

This linked originally to a list of concept prototypes developed during online ideation.

Page 19: Bug 3   no links

The Wall

Page 20: Bug 3   no links
Page 21: Bug 3   no links
Page 22: Bug 3   no links
Page 23: Bug 3   no links
Page 24: Bug 3   no links
Page 25: Bug 3   no links
Page 26: Bug 3   no links

Learning about it

Results of our soft social experiment.

(see notes or other documents for details)

Page 27: Bug 3   no links

• Organising Co-Design Teams

Page 28: Bug 3   no links

• Designing with Non Designers

Page 29: Bug 3   no links

• Leveraging online collaboration

Page 30: Bug 3   no links
Page 31: Bug 3   no links

• Leveraging online collaboration (2)

Page 32: Bug 3   no links

• Managing Co-Design

Page 33: Bug 3   no links

• Managing Co-Design (2)

Page 34: Bug 3   no links

• Keeping Co-Design Teams Engaged

Page 35: Bug 3   no links

• Keeping Co-Design Teams Engaged (2)

Page 36: Bug 3   no links

Now get them built !

Page 37: Bug 3   no links

Thanks !

[email protected]