Top Banner
STUDENT RESEARCH PRESENTATION: AFFECTIVE COMPUTING BY BUSYAIRI PRABU (ERIC) #308303458
25

Bpra1751

Jan 20, 2015

Download

Devices & Hardware

ericprabu

This assignment is part of the IDEA9202 - Device Studio unit of study. Presented by Busyairi Prabu (bpra1751) of university of Sydney 2009
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Bpra1751

STUDENT RESEARCHPRESENTATION:

AFFECTIVE COMPUTINGBY BUSYAIRI PRABU (ERIC)

#308303458

Page 2: Bpra1751

Table of Contents:- Introduction- Refection on 3 Publications- Conclusion

Page 3: Bpra1751

Affective Computing:Affective computing is computing that deals with the attempt tomake machines which can detect and respond to human emotion.

The term "Affective Computing" was the title of an article by Professor Rosalind Picard at the MIT Media Lab in 1995

Reference: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Affective-computing

Page 4: Bpra1751

Academic Paper One:Affective Computing: ChallengesRosalind W. PicardMIT Media Laboratory, Room E15-020G, 20 Ames Street, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USAReceived 17 January 2003; accepted 5 February 2003

Page 5: Bpra1751

Say Hello to

SPOCK:Half-Vulcan/half-humanVery intelligentHighly rational&

Highly unemotional

When someone never expresses Emotion, it is tempting to think that Emotion is not there.

Page 6: Bpra1751

Machines:Example: Macintosh has been displaying a smile for years when successful boot-up.

People tend to confuse the smile asAn emotional expression.

Machines can fake the appearanceOf an emotion, without having anySimilar to those we have.

Page 7: Bpra1751

Rosalind W. PicardExplains:

“Machines that might actually “have” Feelings is the key area of Affective Computing.”

In this paper: She addresses and respondsTo the criticisms and challenges which haveArisen in affective computing explainingWhy it might be more valuable thanPreviously expected.

Published books:Affective Computing, Picard 1997 & 2003

Page 8: Bpra1751

Biometric Surveillance:Face recognition using biometrics

Page 9: Bpra1751

Criticism:The range of mean and modalities of emotion expression is so broad, with many ofThese modalities being inaccessible (e.g., blood chemistry, brain activity, Neurotransmitters), and many others being too non-differentiated. This makes it Unlikely that collecting the necessary data will be possible or feasible in the Near future.

Page 10: Bpra1751

Criticism 2:

The sine qua non of emotion expression is the physical body. To the extent that computers do not have physical bodies, they cannot reliably and believably express emotion. Existing attempts at expressingemotions in robots which are at times referred to as embodied, are unrealistic and therefore unconvincing, and unable to Generate the type of affective responsiveness characterising human-human interaction.

Page 11: Bpra1751

Coco – the interactive monitor:Ability to move its monitor, expressing ways that respond to and encourage its user’s own postural movements.

Page 12: Bpra1751

Zizi the affectionate coach:Home of tomorrowZizi growls when sat upon, purrs when touched and groans with delight when you stroke her fur. If left alone, she mews for attention.

Page 13: Bpra1751

Academic Paper Two:Evaluating Affective Interactions: Alternatives to asking what users feelRosalind W. Picard, Shaundra Bryant DailyMIT Media Laboratory, Room E15-020G, 20 Ames Street, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA2005 paper

Page 14: Bpra1751

Classical methods:Such as –Questionnaires: asking you what you feel nowInterviews: with a video set up, recalling what happen earlier in the task

These methods are valuable and are still used today, this paper will highlightSome alternatives to self-report of feelings.

Page 15: Bpra1751

The Paper:Divided into two categories:

Body Measures (e.g. Change in muscle activity)

&

Task measures(e.g. Better ability to a solve a creativeProblem)

Page 16: Bpra1751

Body Measures of Affect:With computers having abilities affective perceptual abilities such as;- body-worn accelerometers- rubber and fabric electrodes- miniature cameras & microphonesetc

Biggest advantage is that body measurements can be taken parallel with the interaction rather than interrupting the user or asking him after the task.

Page 17: Bpra1751

Wearable Earring:Sense emotional status using blood volume pressure.

Page 18: Bpra1751
Page 19: Bpra1751

Task Measures of Affect:

Findings show ways that affective states tend to influence various behaviours during different tasks.

Within different situations can change the outcome of an individualsInteraction changing their behaviours.

Page 20: Bpra1751

Emotional Bottles:Bottles when open expresses an emotional state of;- Sad- Happy &- Angry

Page 21: Bpra1751

Academic Paper Three:Ambient Display using Musical EffectsLuke Barrington, Michael J. Lyons, Dominique Diegmann, Shinji AbeUniversity of California, San Diego2006

Page 22: Bpra1751

The PaperExamine the communication of information about human affect, and constructA functioning prototype which captures behavioural activity level from the face and maps it to musical affects.

Page 23: Bpra1751
Page 24: Bpra1751
Page 25: Bpra1751

QUESTIONS...?