BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURES MADE WITH RECYCLED COARSE AGGREGATES ORIGINATED FROM THE PRECAST INDUSTRY JOÃO NUNO NORONHA RAMOS VIGÁRIO PACHECO Extended Abstract Master’s Degree in Civil Engineering June of 2014 Supervisors: Prof. Dr. João Paulo Janeiro Gomes Ferreira Prof. Dr. Jorge Manuel Caliço Lopes de Brito
22
Embed
BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURES MADE WITH RECYCLED COARSE ... · behaviour of structures made with recycled coarse aggregates originated from the precast industry joÃo nuno noronha ramos
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURES MADE WITH
RECYCLED COARSE AGGREGATES ORIGINATED
FROM THE PRECAST INDUSTRY
JOÃO NUNO NORONHA RAMOS VIGÁRIO PACHECO
Extended Abstract
Master’s Degree in Civil Engineering
Junho de 2014
June of 2014
Supervisors:
Prof. Dr. João Paulo Janeiro Gomes Ferreira
Prof. Dr. Jorge Manuel Caliço Lopes de Brito
1
1. Introduction and research significance
The use of recycled aggregates (RA) in concrete is a step towards sustainability, enabling a re-
duction of the use of natural resources and of the waste produced.
Attention paid to this kind of material increased after WWII, given the urgent infrastructural and
housing needs, combined with the quantity of debris generated in some cities damaged by air
raids. Hansen (1992) provided a state-of-the-art on RA at the end of the 20th century. Presently,
the knowledge regarding this material is much more substantial, mostly because of the interest
in the behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) increased, due to social, political and
cultural aspects regarding environment protection.
It is, however, necessary to further investigate the impact of this kind of aggregate on the prop-
erties of actual concrete structures, since most of the studies made focus on the material (me-
chanical and durability-related) properties of RAC, stopping short of its structural performance.
In this context, the BARPINP project, partly described in this document, intended to evaluate not
only the mechanical and durability properties of concrete mixes produced with recycled coarse
aggregates, but also the structural properties of structures made with those mixes. Since the recy-
cled aggregates were sourced from elements of the precasting industry, a high quality material was
obtained and a reduced influence of RA incorporation was expected. This document is related
only to the experiments regarding the structural behaviour of the different concrete mixes.
The innovative aspects of this experiment concern the use of RA from the precasting industry, and
the fact that, to the author’s best knowledge, this is the first study ever regarding the dynamic
behaviour of full-scale recycled concrete structures, the behaviour of full-scale recycled con-
crete slabs, the behaviour of a full-scale recycled aggregate concrete structure subjected to hori-
zontal loads and the first study regarding the behaviour of three-dimensional recycled aggregate
concrete frames, subjected to monotonic loading. It is also relevant that, contrary to most experi-
ments, these structures were executed in a common construction environment, with some choices
made to comply with such working conditions (like a simpler aggregate size grading). Thus it can be
stated that this study aims at replicating the performance of RAC structures as if they were built for
common construction purposes, and not for research purposes.
2. Objectives
This study aims not only at assessing whether the performance of RAC structures follows the
assumptions made when designing conventional reinforced concrete structures, but also at esti-
mating some core parameters of the structural behaviour, such as elastic modulus, natural frequen-
cies, cracking and ductility. To fulfil this purpose four full-scale recycled concrete structures,
made with various recycled aggregate ratios, were tested. Herein is described the design and mod-
elling of the test structures, as well as various tests and analysis of their results, namely dynamic
characterization tests, vertical loading tests and horizontal destructive tests.
The dynamic characterization tests allowed the study of the natural frequencies and dynamic be-
havioural pattern of the concrete compositions, as well as the estimation of the global elastic mod-
ulus of each concrete composition, by finite element modelling. The vertical loading tests intended
to study the execution conditions and stiffness of the slabs, with data concerning the midspan de-
flections of beams and slabs; these tests only studied the elastic response of the structures, to avoid
different levels of damage on the structures, which would influence the results of the last studies
2
carried out, by means of horizontal destructive actions, that replicated a pushover load, as defined
in Eurocode 8. These horizontal destructive tests allowed the comparison between force / defor-
mation curves, the evaluation of the ductility and cracking behaviour, the overall pattern of behav-
iour, hinge formation and the collapse mechanism of the test structures.
3. Experimental programme
Materials
Natural aggregates (NA) and recycled coarse aggregates (RA) were used. The NA used were lime-
stone coarse gravel and river sand. The recycled aggregates came from concrete blocks used in
the precast industry as support for long-span beams, with compressive strength well above 50
MPa. These concrete blocks were processed in a crushing plant, originating aggregates with a proper
grading (maximum aggregate dimension of 20 mm).
Composition of the concrete mixes
The objective was to develop concrete mixes within Eurocode 2’s class C25/30. Prior to defining
the four mixes of the structures, several concrete mixes produced in laboratory conditions were
tested for compressive strength, with the aim of determining a mix with the highest possible RA
content but without decreasing significantly the resulting concrete’s strength, and a mix with a
feasible content of superplasticizer (SP) that maximized the gains in compressive strength, for
total replacement of the coarse fraction of the aggregates. The other two mixes were a reference
mix (REF) and a mix with no SP and in which all coarse aggregates are RA (B100).
Certainly due to the high quality of the RA coming from precast elements, it was found that in
fact concrete strength slightly increased with the ratio of RA. Hence the four mixes used in this
campaign were as follows: REF - reference mix; B25 - a mix with the maximum ratio (25%) of
RA allowed by the Portuguese Laboratory of Civil Engineering (2006) and other institutions
(Gonçalves and de Brito, 2010), with the intent of replicating the properties of a conventional
concrete; B100; and B100SP - a mix similar to the previous one but with 1% superplasticizer by
cement weight. Table 1 contains the composition of each of these four mixes.
Table 1 - Concrete mixes’ composition (kg/m3 of concrete)
Concrete mix
Material REF R25 R100 R100SP
Fine sand 249.62 243.78 245.05 258.84
Coarse sand 543.3 448.79 450.12 475.45
Coarse natural aggregates 4-11.2 mm 358.42 328.05 0 0
11.2-22.4 mm 645.75 500.1 0 0
Coarse recycled aggregates 4-10 mm 0 83.32 333.27 352.02
10-20 mm 0 170.96 683.83 722.31
CEM II A-L 42.5R cement 350 350 350 350
Tap water 185.5 185.5 185.5 143.5
Superplasticizer 0 0 0 3.5
The aggregate’s grading followed a request from Opway (the construction company that supported
this project), based on practicability on site - the difference in maximum size between the NA and
the RA was due to the crushing process and the impracticality of sieving the natural aggregates.
The reinforcement steel used was A500, with B class of ductility. Table 2 shows the results of
the tensile strength tests, for rebars taken from the same shipment as the one used on-site.
3
Table 2 - Results of the tensile strength tests done on rebars
Average values fyk εyk ftk εuk k
533.8 MPa 2.0% 622.3 MPa 13.7% 1.17
This experiment only considers the use of the coarse fraction of the recycled aggregates, since the
fine fraction tends to have a higher percentage of attached mortar, thus resulting in a larger loss of
durability and mechanical properties (González-Fonteboa and Martínez, 2007; Sato et al., 2007).
Regulations and design of the test-structures
The design of the test-structures complied with Eurocode 2 (CEN; 2004a), Eurocode 7 (CEN;
2004b) and Eurocode 8 (CEN; 2004c). Due to testing limitations regarding the horizontal load
tests, concerning not only the maximum capacity of the grip hoists used in the load application
process, but also the costs of the foundations and anchor block, an adaptation was made: the
longitudinal reinforcement of the columns had to be reduced and did not fully comply with Eu-
rocode 8’s requirements regarding the formation of plastic hinges in the beams in column-beam
joints. Despite this, it was experimentally verified that, in the first floor, the hinges occurred
first in the beams, as initially intended. The design stage had to guarantee the following condi-
tions, regarding the horizontal load tests and respective structural behaviour: a ductile behaviour
(characterized by the formation of flexure hinges), the technical and economic feasibility of the
experiment and a simple test setup that would guarantee the operation of the equipment without
errors.
The computer program used was CSI’s SAP2000 (v15) and the loads were applied taking into
consideration the geometry of the structure and an inverted triangular horizontal distribution,
with loads applied to both floors at the slab level. Table 3 shows such forces, applied in nodes
as a “displacement controlled load case”. This kind of load is defined as a vector (last column of
the table), and for each step the software applies a factor that increases or decreases the forces
(during loading or unloading stages) in comparison with the previous load step.
Table 3 - Loads setup
Ratio between horizontal forces in the upper cables and lower cables: 2.05
Cable Vector direction Length %/direction Normalized force
Cable 1
Pushover 17.05 m 95.36% 205.00
Orthogonal/horizontal 1.40 m 7.83% 16.83
Orthogonal/vertical 5.20 m 29.08% 62.52
Cable 2
Pushover 18.76 m 96.12% 205.00
Orthogonal/horizontal 1.40 m 7.17% 15.30
Orthogonal/vertical 5.20 m 26.64% 56.82
Cables 3 and 4
Pushover 18.00 m 99.07% 100.00
Orthogonal/horizontal 1.13 m 6.19% 6.25
Orthogonal/vertical 2.20 m 12.11% 12.22
fy - yielding stress
ft - maximum stress
k - hardening factor
εyk - yielding strain
εuk - strain at maximum
stress
4
For the purpose of designing the test set-up, the finite element model (FEM), used for both the struc-
tures and the anchor block (as well as the rest of the load application system), was made considering
the concrete’s (class C25/30) 95% characteristic material properties, instead of the normally used 5%
characteristic values - the material characteristics of the reinforcement steel were, at this stage, esti-
mated considering that the yielding stress was 1.3 times the characteristic design value (the maxi-
mum capacity specified by Eurocode 2). The nonlinearities were modelled as fibre plastic hinges (at
the ends of the columns and beams) and the model suggested by Mander et al. (1988) was used to
estimate the properties of confined concrete. The maximum forces of the cables during the experi-
ment, predicted by the FEM, were used to design the anchor block; Eurocode 7 was taken into con-
sideration, and possible undesired collapse mechanisms (such as shear failure of the structural ele-
ments or toppling) were accounted for, considering a safety factor of 1.5. The anchor block was 1.7
m high, 1.2 m of which sunken into the ground (mobilizing passive impulse) and has a square shape
with 2.75 m sides. A grid of reinforcement bars was used, as well as a system with 1 m screws and
threaded couplers, which allowed the attachment of the bi-articulated anchor points.
Model’s characterization
Figure 1 shows the models geometry and reinforcement layout. The slabs are 0.10 m thick and
their reinforcement is a bottom mesh of 8 mm rebars spaced 20 cm in both directions. Since the
foundations (Figure 2) are two large concrete blocks, a full base restraint of the columns is en-
sured (as confirmed during the horizontal load tests by the displacement values of topographic
targets 5 and 6, shown in Figure 13). The rebars cover in the columns is 2.5 cm and in the rest
of the structure 2.0 cm.
Figure 1 - Geometry and reinforcement layout of the test-structures
Since the size of the elements that make the structure is relatively small, deviations in geometry
can be meaningful; hence a geometry survey of the structure was performed, for FEM purposes.
The slabs’ thickness was considered equal to the length of concrete cores taken from their cen-
tres whilst the columns’ dimensions were considered equal to the average of two measurements
made along their length.
The slabs’ thickness ranged between 10.5 cm and 11.6 cm and the columns cross-section sides
varied between 19.4 cm and 21.8 cm. The density of each concrete mix was considered equal to
the average of those of 16 standard test cubes, made during the execution of each of the structures.
A FEM was made for each structure, considering these dimensions and densities.
5
Figure 3 - Location of the transducers
Figure 2 - Geometry and reinforcement layout of
the foundations
4. Experimental procedure
4.1. Dynamic characterization tests
Definition of the test setup and test procedure
The four structures were tested 65 ± 5 days after the execution of the second floor.
All the tests were performed twice: once with two piezoelectric unidirectional accelerometers,
connected to charge amplifiers and a data acquisition unit and a second time with a triaxial strong-
motion seismograph. For the horizontal vibration tests the accelerometers were placed in the col-
umn/beam joints, in the direction of the excitation, at each slab level separately during the hori-
zontal testing, whilst the seismograph was placed in two distinct locations in each floor: one at the
centre of the slabs, minimizing the torsional frequency readings, and another at the edge of the
slabs, with maximum eccentricity, maximizing those readings. For the vertical excitations, the
seismographs had the same location and the accelerometers were placed at the centre of each slab.
The location of the measuring systems is shown in Figure 3.
The characteristics of the readings and subsequent frequency analysis are given in Table 4. The
frequency ranges studied are not limited by the Nyquist frequency (the maximum frequency that
can be analyzed by a given test record, equal to half the sampling rate), due to the low-pass filters
applied on both setups. The frequency analysis was made using a FFT transform with 4096
(212
) data points.
Table 4 - Characteristics of the data acquired and of the frequency functions
Equipment Sample rate Nyquist frequency Low-pass filter
Accelerometers 300 Hz 150 Hz 100 Hz
Seismograph 200 Hz 100 Hz 80 Hz
Three kinds of excitation were studied: centered, eccentric and vertical (by jumping on top of the
slabs). The centered and eccentric excitations were imposed by manually pushing a rope, with
6
unspecified intensity. Figure 4 clarifies the horizontal excitations in the first floor of one structure
- similar excitations also occurred in the second floor of each structure. Additionally, the seismo-
graph was also used to measure ambient vibrations, for each test setup. The ambient sources of
excitation were mainly the wind and agricultural vehicles, functioning in a field nearby.
Figure 4 - Horizontal excitations performed (first floor)
Results and discussion
Vibration modes, frequencies and FEM calibration
The horizontal dynamic response of the four structures followed the non-calibrated FEM, both
in terms of vibration modes and frequencies. This numerical model predicted that the first and
third horizontal modal shapes were pure translations, whilst the third had a torsional configura-
tion. Figure 5 is an example (forced vibration readings done with the seismograph) of the fre-
quency functions obtained with this analysis.
Figure 5 - Average horizontal frequencies and confidence intervals (forced vibrations, seismograph)
The elastic modulus (E) calibration analysis (discussed below) provides a better comparison
between structures, namely due to geometry differences between them. For instance, the higher
frequencies of R25 comparing to REF’s could be a consequence of thicker columns (hence
higher transverse stiffness), instead of a higher E.
All the tests were used to estimate the first horizontal mode, whilst for the second mode the seis-
mograph’s readings used were the ones with the seismograph in the eccentric position and with
the structure subjected to torsional excitation. The accelerometers’ results used for the second
mode were the ones with the eccentric excitation, considering the difference between the accelera-
tions measured in each accelerometer (for the first and third mode the value used was the average
of the readings). The third mode was considered in all the tests performed, when significant.
7
The results of the ambient and forced vibration tests, as well as of readings made with the seis-
mograph and with the accelerometers, are consistent.
The results suggest a decrease in frequency due to the incorporation of RA, even though R25
presents slightly higher frequencies than REF, probably because of variations in the curing and
execution conditions (in Figure 5 there is an overlap in confidence intervals). However, the dif-
ference between both R25 and REF when compared to R100 strongly suggests a decrease in
frequencies with AR incorporation, following the studies regarding E and deformations present-
ed in the literature review. R100SP showed the highest frequencies, due to the increase of E
caused by the use of SP, as obtained in the laboratory tests of the small specimens and as Bar-
budo et al. (2013), Matias et al. (2013) and Pereira et al. (2012) argue.
The vertical frequencies are highly dependent on the thickness of the slabs, as seen in Table 5,
where no RA-trend can be perceived. The vertical frequencies’ results have a higher scatter than
the horizontal ones, mostly due to the lower number of samples. The confidence intervals were
determined for a significance level of 0.05.
Table 5 - Statistical parameters of the vertical frequencies’ analysis