Top Banner
BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science, in this case astrophysics, was made in 1835 by the prominent French philosopher Auguste Comte. In his Cours de la Philosophie Positive he wrote: On the subject of stars, all investigations which are not ultimately reducible to simple visual observations are ... necessarily denied to us. While we can conceive of the possibility of determining their shapes, their sizes, and their motions, we shall never be able by any means to study their chemical composition or their mineralogical structure ... Our knowledge concerning their gaseous envelopes is necessarily limited to their existence, size ... and refractive power, we shall not at all be able to determine their chemical composition or even their density... I regard any notion concerning the true mean temperature of the various stars as forever denied to us. However, only 14 years later, the physicist Kirchhoff discovered that the chemical composition of a gas could be deduced from its electromagnetic spectrum viewed from an arbitrary distance. This method was extended to astronomical bodies by Huggins in 1864, who first used a spectrograph attached to a telescope. Not only have we learned how to determine the chemical composition of the stars and nebulae, but the element helium (the second most abundant in the universe) was first identified in the spectrum of the Sun, rather than in an earthbound laboratory. Today we use spectroscopy to measure chemical abundances, temperatures,
15

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Mar 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Ayala

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science, in this case astrophysics, was made in 1835 by the prominent French philosopher Auguste Comte. In his Cours de la Philosophie Positive he wrote : - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science, in this case astrophysics, was made in 1835 by the prominent French philosopher Auguste Comte. In his Cours de la Philosophie Positive he wrote:

On the subject of stars, all investigations which are not ultimately reducible to simple visual observations are ... necessarily denied to us. While we can conceive of the possibility of determining their shapes, their sizes, and their motions, we shall never be able by any means to study their chemical composition or their mineralogical structure ... Our knowledge concerning their gaseous envelopes is necessarily limited to their existence, size ... and refractive power, we shall not at all be able to determine their chemical composition or even their density... I regard any notion concerning the true mean temperature of the various stars as forever denied to us.

However, only 14 years later, the physicist Kirchhoff discovered that the chemical composition of a gas could be deduced from its electromagnetic spectrum viewed from an arbitrary distance. This method was extended to astronomical bodies by Huggins in 1864, who first used a spectrograph attached to a telescope. Not only have we learned how to determine the chemical composition of the stars and nebulae, but the element helium (the second most abundant in the universe) was first identified in the spectrum of the Sun, rather than in an earthbound laboratory.

Today we use spectroscopy to measure chemical abundances, temperatures, velocities, rotations, ionization states, magnetic fields, pressure, turbulence, density, and many other properties of distant planets, stars, and galaxies. Some objects studied this way are over 10 billion light years away. Spectroscopy is the richest source of information about the universe. In its laboratory setting, spectroscopy provided the experimental basis for quantum mechanics.

Two lessons: nature usually outstrips the human imagination. And philosophers often get science wrong.

Page 2: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

“Perfect” Thermal/Planck Radiation”:

Page 3: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Imperfect “Thermal/Planck/Blackbody Radiation”:

Page 4: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 5: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 6: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 7: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Generating a Thermal Radiation Spectrum (“White Light”):

Page 8: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Generating Emission “Spectral Lines”:

Page 9: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 10: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Generating Absorption “Spectral Lines”:

Page 11: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 12: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 13: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 14: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,
Page 15: BAD PHILOSOPHY  One  of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

Absorption Spectral Lines of Our Sun Solar Composition!