Assisted by Kevin Kulavic Vicki Thomas Crystal Woolardilga.gov/commission/jcar/JCAR 2018 Annual Report... · Kevin Kulavic Vicki Thomas Crystal Woolard. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT of the

Annual ReportCompiled and Edited by

Elaine SpencerJonathan Eastvold

Assisted byKevin KulavicVicki Thomas

Crystal Woolard

2018ANNUAL REPORT

of the

JOINT COMMITTEE ONADMINISTRATIVE RULES

Submitted to the Members of theIllinois General Assembly

Senator Don Harmon, Co-ChairRepresentative Keith Wheeler, Co-Chair

Representative Tom DemmerRepresentative Michael Halpin

Representative Frances Ann HurleySenator Kimberly Lightford

Senator Antonio MuñozRepresentative Steven Reick

Senator Sue RezinSenator Paul Schimpf

Representative André ThapediSenator Chuck Weaver

Vicki ThomasExecutive Director

700 Stratton BuildingSpringfield IL 62706

217/785-2254 [email protected]

TO: Honorable Members of the 101st General Assembly

FROM: Don Harmon, Co-ChairKeith Wheeler, Co-Chair

DATE: February 1, 2019

RE: JCAR Annual Report

As Co-Chairs of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, we hereby submit the 2018 Annual Reportof that Committee. An overview of the Committee's rules review activities can be found in the followingpages.

The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules gratefully acknowledges your continued support andassistance. We encourage all members of the General Assembly to take an active role in this vital oversightfunction guaranteeing that the public right to know is protected through an open rulemaking process. Wewelcome your suggestions and comments on agency rules and the role of the Committee. Only as eachelected representative becomes concerned and involved in the oversight process can the Committee ensurethat the intent of the legislation the General Assembly passes is maintained.

JOINT COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE RULESILLINOIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

CO-CHAIR: SEN. DON HARMON

CO-CHAIR: REP. KEITH WHEELER

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: VICKI THOMAS 700 STRATTON BUILDING

SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62706217/785-2254

SEN. KIMBERLY LIGHTFORDSEN. TONY MUÑOZSEN. SUE REZINSEN. PAUL SCHIMPFSEN. CHUCK WEAVERREP. TOM DEMMERREP. MIKE HALPINREP. FRANCES ANN HURLEYREP. STEVEN REICKREP. ANDRÉ THAPEDI

Table of Contents

JCAR

JCAR – Its Creation and Its Purpose ........................................................................................................ 1JCAR Membership ......................................................................................................................................... 3Illinois Rulemaking Process ....................................................................................................................... 5

2018 Rulemaking ............................................................................................................................................ 9General Rulemaking ....................................................................................................................................... 9Table: General Rulemakings Proposed by Agencies .................................................................................... 13Table: General Rulemakings Considered by JCAR ..................................................................................... 15Table: General Rulemakings: JCAR Action ................................................................................................ 17Table: General Rulemakings: Basis for JCAR Action ................................................................................ 18Emergency Rulemaking ..............................................................................................................................19Table: Emergency Rulemakings Adopted by Agencies ............................................................................... 21Table: Emergency Rulemakings Considered by JCAR ................................................................................ 22Table: Emergency Rulemakings: JCAR Action ............................................................................................ 23Table: Emergency Rulemakings: Basis for JCAR Action ........................................................................... 24Peremptory & Exempt Rulemaking .........................................................................................................25Table: Peremptory/Exempt Rulemakings Adopted by Agencies ................................................................ 26Table: Peremptory/Exempt Rulemakings Considered by JCAR ................................................................. 27Table: Peremptory/Exempt Rulemakings: JCAR Action ............................................................................ 28Required Rulemaking ..................................................................................................................................29Table: Required Rulemakings Adopted by Agencies ................................................................................... 30Table: Required Rulemakings Considered by JCAR.................................................................................... 31Table: Required Rulemakings: JCAR Actions ............................................................................................. 32Agency Responses ........................................................................................................................................33Table: JCAR Assessment of Appropriateness of Agency Response to JCAR Action ............................ 33

Legislation Related to Rulemaking Issues .............................................................................................35Legislation Related to the IAPA ...............................................................................................................37Public Act Review .........................................................................................................................................39Special Review of ADA Procedures .........................................................................................................41Freedom of Information Act Rules ...........................................................................................................43Complaint Review Program ........................................................................................................................45Judicial Activity Relating to JCAR and IAPA .......................................................................................47Filing Prohibitions and Suspensions Issued By JCAR ........................................................................55Quantitative History of Rulemaking Activity by Agency: 1978-2018 ..............................................63Table: History of General Rulemaking by Agency....................................................................................... 63Table: History of Emergency Rulemaking by Agency ................................................................................. 68Table: History of Peremptory/Exempt Rulemaking by Agency .................................................................. 71

Annual Report: 2018

1

JCAR Its Creation and Its Purpose

Creation

The Illinois General Assembly created the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) in 1977and delegated to it the responsibility of the legislative branch to ensure that the laws it enacts areappropriately implemented through administrative law. The specific duties and authorities of JCAR areoutlined in the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (IAPA), as is the Illinois rulemaking process.

Responsibilities

The Committee's principal programs and activities include:

Review of General Rulemaking. In the course of this review, JCAR seeks to facilitateinvolvement by the affected public and to make the review process a timely and efficient onethat assists State agencies in their goal of enacting the best administrative law possible.

Review of Emergency and Peremptory Rulemakings to ensure that they are justifiable withinthe IAPA's limitations on these types of rulemakings. Emergency and peremptory rulemakingsare not subject to the IAPA's public comment requirements, and thus should be usedconservatively.

Review of Existing Agency Rules and Policies to determine if they have been properlypromulgated, are unauthorized or unreasonable, or result in serious negative impact on thecitizens of this State. These reviews can be undertaken upon JCAR's own initiative or inresponse to a complaint from the public.

Public Act Review to determine the necessity for new or amendatory rulemaking in responseto legislative changes. JCAR devises a list of laws it believes may generate rulemaking activity,shares that list with the agencies, and monitors agency activity to determine if appropriateaction is taken.

Legislative Activities. JCAR reviews any proposed legislation that amends the IllinoisAdministrative Procedure Act and brings to agencies' attention any resulting changes inrulemaking procedures. Legislation involving issues that have recently come before JCAR isalso followed. Under its IAPA mandate to continually seek to improve the rulemakingprocess, JCAR occasionally initiates legislation revising the IAPA. It also may proposelegislation when rules review brings attention to a statutory insufficiency or lack of clarity or toenforce its Objections or Recommendations when an agency has refused to adhere to thoseObjections or Recommendations.

Public Information. JCAR provides information on rules and the rulemaking process tolegislators and the public through several conduits. First, JCAR makes available (on-line atwww.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/flinn/flinn.asp) The Flinn Report: Illinois Regulation, a weeklynewsletter that summarizes State agency rulemaking activities. The newsletter is used by manyas an alternative to monitoring the weekly Illinois Register. The newsletter highlights themajor issues; the reader can then seek a copy of the specific rulemaking or further information

2

The Review Process

The JCAR membership meets at least once each month to consider an agenda that generally includesfrom 35 to 50 separate rulemakings by State agencies. In a year's time, JCAR will reviewapproximately 20,000 pages of rule text. The IAPA dictates that the Committee's analysis ofrulemakings be based on such concerns as statutory authority and legislative intent, necessity of theregulation, economic impact on State government and the affected public, completeness andappropriateness of standards to be relied upon in the exercise of agency discretion, effect on localgovernment through the creation of a mandate, adherence to IAPA rulemaking requirements, and form.

JCAR's review of agency regulatory proposals is predominantly substantive. Its major concern is thatstatutory law is applied fairly and consistently, creating as little paperwork and economic burden forthe affected public as possible. The Committee serves as the final avenue for input from the publicbefore a rulemaking is formally adopted. Recommendations from the public are always welcome andare actively sought. The Committee recognizes that no one is as qualified to comment on theappropriateness and practicality of a proposed regulation as the individual whose activities or businesspractices will be affected by that regulation. Comment on any proposed or existing State regulationmay be submitted to the Committee at 700 Stratton Building, Springfield IL 62706, or by calling217/785-2254.

JCAR's perusal of agency rulemakings serves a technical purpose as well. The various rulemakings ofthe State agencies collectively comprise the Illinois Administrative Code. In giving a final technicalreview to each agency proposal, JCAR, along with the Secretary of State's Index Department, strivesto achieve some degree of consistency among the individual agencies' portions of the Code and tomake the Code as readable and understandable for the public as possible.

Annual Report

This Report includes narratives of JCAR activity during 2018, as well as statistical summaries of therulemaking activities of State agencies. The summary of legislation affecting JCAR reflects activity ofthe 2nd year of the 101st GA. This Report also includes an historical overview of rulemaking andpertinent historical statistics.

from the proposing agency. Second, JCAR has created and maintains the Illinois AdministrativeCode database. The database is used in the publishing of the Illinois Register by the Secretary ofState's Index Department. State agencies can request materials from the database for use in draftingamendatory rulemakings. The database is accessible on the General Assembly website(www.ilga.gov/commission/jcar/admincode/titles.html). Although emergency rules are not embeddedinto the database, the database indicates that emergency rules have been adopted and containsautomatic links to the Illinois Register database, where the emergency rules can be viewed. When anagency moves a rulemaking from the First Notice (public comment) period to the Second Notice(JCAR review) period, JCAR engrosses any First Notice changes into the text of the rulemaking. Thisis the version of the rulemaking that JCAR reviews. This Second Notice version of the rulemaking canbe viewed by the public through the JCAR portion of the ILGA website under "SecondNotices".Third, JCAR staff is always available to respond to inquiries from General Assemblymembers and the public. For more information, call 217/785-2254 or contact JCAR by e-mail [email protected].

3

JCAR MEMBERSHIP

The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules consists of 12 legislators who are appointed by theGeneral Assembly leadership. Membership is equally apportioned between the 2 houses and betweenthe 2 political parties. The 2 Co-Chairs are not members of the same house or the same party.

2018 MEMBERS

Senator Don Harmon, Co-ChairSenator Pamela AlthoffSenator Karen McConnaughaySenator Antonio MuñozSenator Sue RezinSenator Paul SchimpfSenator Ira SilversteinSenator Chuck Weaver

Representative Keith Wheeler, Co-ChairRepresentative Peter BreenRepresentative Tom DemmerRepresenative Greg HarrisRepresentative Lou LangRepresentative André ThapediRepresentative Barbara Flynn Currie

Bill W. BalthisAllen BennettArthur L. BermanBill BlackPrescott E. BloomGlen L. BowerJack E. BowersWoods BowmanWilliam "Bill" BradyJ. Bradley BurzynskiJames F. Clayborne, Jr.John W. CountrymanMary Lou CowlishawTom CrossMaggie CrottyJohn CullertonMichael CurranRichard M. DaleySteve DavisVince DemuzioLaura DonahueJames H. DonnewaldThomas DunnJim EdgarTom EwingBeverly FawellMonroe FlinnJohn Fritchey

FORMER MEMBERS

Barbara GiolittoJames GitzAlan J. GreimanKenneth HallCharles HartkeKaren HasaraBrent HassertCarl E. HawkinsonLarry HicksManny HoffmannTom HolbrookRandall HultgrenMattie HunterEmil Jones, Jr.John O. JonesJeremiah E. JoyceDouglas N. KaneDoris KarpielRichard Kelly, Jr.Bob KustraThaddeus LechowiczDavid LeitchLarry LeonardEllis LevinRichard LuftLisa MadiganJohn W. Maitland, Jr.Lynn Martin

John M. MatejekRoger McAuliffeThomas J. McCracken, Jr.Sam McGrewLarry McKeonA.T. "Tom" McMasterJim MeyerDavid MillerDon MoffittRosemary MulliganMatt MurphyPhil NovakBarack ObamaWilliam O'DanielMyron J. OlsonCoy PughJim ReaSteve RauschenbergerDavid J. RegnerJim ReillySue RezinDale RighterPhilip J. RockDan RutherfordTom RyderGeorge SangmeisterAngelo "Skip" SavianoFrank D. Savickas

Timothy SchmitzJohn SharpTodd StrogerArt TenhouseDonne E. TrotterMike TryonSam VinsonRichard A. WalshLarry WennlundRobert C. WinchesterKathleen WojcikHarry WoodyardLarry WoolardHarry "Bus" Yourell

4

5

Illinois Rulemaking Process

Illinois law exists in 4 basic forms: constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law and case law.Constitutional law creates broad guidelines. Legislation creates specific restrictions, authorities andprograms. Administrative law adds the detail often necessary to implement statutory law. If these 3categories of law do not sufficiently address all the variables, case law evolves.

In 1975, the Illinois General Assembly enacted the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (IAPA) [5ILCS 100] to create a procedure through which administrative agencies would exercise the authoritydelegated to them by the legislature to create administrative law through the adoption of agencyregulations. In 1977, the IAPA was amended to add a process by which the General Assembly couldoversee the exercise of this delegated authority through the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules(JCAR), a service agency of the General Assembly.

Rules of an administrative agency are valid and enforceable only after they have been through therulemaking process prescribed in the IAPA. Rules are for the purpose of interpreting or implementingprovisions of a statute and should not actually expand or limit the scope of the statute.

Types of Rulemakings

Proposed Rulemaking. These can be new rules or amendatory rulemakings. Frequently this is

referred to as "regular rulemaking" or "permanent rulemaking". A 2-step (First Notice and SecondNotice) process is followed, requiring from 90-365 days. Aside from the 2 45-day periods, FirstNotice and Second Notice, the agency controls the timing. Both the general public and the GeneralAssembly, through JCAR, can have input prior to adoption.

Emergency Rules. Rules are effective immediately upon the agency filing them with the SOS or

within 9 days after filing. These rules can be developed unilaterally by the agency; JCAR reviews afterthe rules are adopted. An emergency rule lasts 150 days unless an earlier date is specified or theemergency rule is replaced by a permanent rulemaking. Emergency rulemaking can be used only if theagency finds a threat to the public interest, safety or welfare exists that the rulemaking will address.

Peremptory Rules. The IAPA provides for the immediate adoption of a rule required as a result

of a federal law, federal rule, collective bargaining agreement, or court order under conditions thatpreclude discretion by the agency concerning the rule's content. Peremptory rules are effective uponfiling with the SOS or on the date required by the federal law, federal rule or court order. JCARreviews these rules after their adoption.

Exempt or Identical in Substance Rules. The IAPA, the Environmental Protection Act

and the Illinois Emergency Management Act create a special process through which PCB and IEMAcan adopt regulations that are identical in substance to federal regulations that the State is required toadopt and enforce. These rulemakings are reviewed by JCAR after adoption.

Required Rulemaking. These are rules that can be adopted unilaterally by the agency by filing

with the SOS. Examples are organization charts, principal address, Freedom of Information Act

6

information, hearing officer qualifications, etc. JCAR reviews required rules after their adoption.

The Process

Drafting of Rules. Administrative rules are drafted by State agencies; there is no central drafting

bureau as for statutes. The involvement of the public in the initial drafting is at the discretion of theagency; however, the IAPA encourages early public involvement and requires agencies to semiannuallypublish a Regulatory Agenda indicating, to the best of the agency's knowledge, the scope of the next 6months' rulemaking activity.

First Notice. The First Notice period commences upon publication of an agency's Notice of

Rulemaking in the Illinois Register. First Notice lasts a minimum of 45 days and terminates when theagency files with JCAR, commencing the Second Notice period. The only limitation is that arulemaking expires, if not adopted, within one year after commencement of First Notice. The IAPArequires that, during First Notice, the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity revieweach proposed rulemaking to determine possible impact on small business. The general public cansubmit comment on the rulemaking proposal to the agency and a public hearing may or may not beheld during this period. The agency can volunteer to hold a hearing or must conduct one at the requestof the Governor, JCAR, an association representing over 100 persons, 25 individuals, or a localgovernment. Requests for hearing must be filed within 14 days after publication of the First Notice.The agency can modify the rulemaking during First Notice by submitting a First Notice Changesdocument to JCAR when it gives Second Notice.

Second Notice. The Second Notice period commences upon the agency's filing of the Second

Notice with JCAR and lasts for a maximum of 45 days, unless extended for an additional 45 days bymutual agreement of JCAR and the agency. During the Second Notice Period, legislative review ofthe rules is conducted first by the JCAR staff and then at a meeting of the legislative members. JCARreviews the proposed rules for statutory authority, propriety, standards for the exercise of discretion,economic effects, clarity, procedural requirements, technical aspects, etc.

During the JCAR review, JCAR and the agency can agree to modifications in the rulemaking that areadopted through written JCAR Agreements. The Agreements are appended to the Certificate of NoObjection issued by JCAR at its regular meeting, or are still applicable if no Certificate is issued butthe agency proceeds to adopt. If the agency does not choose to modify a rulemaking or if policydifferences cannot be resolved during the review process, JCAR can take one of several actions.

JCAR Actions

Certificate of No Objection. With the Certificate, the agency can proceed to adopt the rules

by filing them with the SOS for publication in the Illinois Register.

Recommendation. (Issued along with a Certificate of No Objection) The agency should

respond to the Recommendation in writing within 90 days and can modify the rule in response to aJCAR Recommendation. (After going to Second Notice, the agency cannot unilaterally modify/withdraw a rulemaking.) However, the agency can also adopt the rules with no changes at any time

7

after receipt of the Certificate of No Objection.

Objection. An agency has to respond to an Objection in writing within 90 days, but after

responding can proceed to adopt. The agency can modify or withdraw in response to a JCARObjection or adopt the rules without changes. JCAR Agreements still apply.

Filing Prohibition/Suspension. If JCAR determines that a rulemaking constitutes a threat to

the public interest, safety or welfare, the members can, by a 3/5 vote of the members appointed to theCommittee (normally 8 of the 12 members), prohibit filing of a proposed rulemaking (or suspend anemergency or peremptory rule). As a result, the proposed rulemaking may not be accepted for filingby the Secretary of State or enforced by the agency unless JCAR withdraws the Prohibition or theGeneral Assembly acts to end the Prohibition within 180 days. An emergency or peremptory rule thathas already been adopted becomes null and void for a period of 180 days, after which it isautomatically repealed unless JCAR withdraws the Suspension or the General Assembly acts to endthe Suspension within the 180 days.

Public Notification

Illinois Register is the official State publication through which the public is informed of rulemaking

activity. The Illinois Register is prepared by JCAR and published by the Secretary of State everyFriday and can be accessed through the General Assembly website (www.ilga.gov) or the Secretary ofState's website. The Register contains First Notice publication of rulemaking proposals, JCAR actions,a list of Second Notices received by JCAR, notices of final adoption of rulemakings, regulatoryagendas (in January and July), executive orders and proclamations, miscellaneous agency notices asallowed by law, and quarterly indexes to the current and previous issues. Over the course of a year,the Register contains on average 20,000 pages. Paper subscriptions are available from the Secretaryof State for $290/year; it can also be accessed for free on the Secretary of State website, and isavailable electronically through private publishers.

The Flinn Report: Illinois Regulation is a 4-6 page weekly online publication by JCAR

that summarizes the rulemaking activity depicted in the matching issue of the Illinois Register. TheFlinn Report is available weekly on the General Assembly's website at www.ilga.gov.

Illinois Administrative Code. The compilation of all agency rules is known as the Illinois

Administrative Code. The Code, which is larger than the Illinois Compiled Statutes, is maintainedelectronically by JCAR and the Legislative Information System (LIS). That database is located on theGeneral Assembly's website at ilga.gov. State agencies can request from JCAR downloads of specificSections to use for drafting purposes.

8

Public Participation

One of the main reasons the IAPA was enacted was to give the public input into the rulemakingprocess. Any interested persons may contact an agency during the First Notice period to record aposition on a rulemaking proposal. Additionally, many agencies consult with their identified interestgroups during a pre-First Notice drafting process.

When the rulemaking goes to Second Notice, JCAR receives a copy or summary of all written commentsubmitted to the agency. In addition, the public may contact JCAR directly, and frequently does so if theagency refused to modify in response to public comment or if they discovered the existence of the proposaltoo late for the First Notice public comment period.

Public comment is vital to the JCAR review process. Frequently, it is only through this comment that theCommittee fully recognizes the effect of a rule on individuals, businesses or local governments that have toadhere to it on a daily basis.

The public may also lodge complaints about existing rules. Agencies are required to allow the public tosuggest rule revisions. Additionally, JCAR may open an investigation into an existing rule on its own volitionor based on public complaint.

9

2018 Rulemaking

In 2018 JCAR reviewed 403 rulemakings, 337 of which were general rulemakings, 40 emergencyrulemakings, 3 peremptory rulemakings, 14 exempt rulemakings, and 9 required rulemakings. On thegeneral rulemakings, JCAR voted 4 Objections, 1 Objection and Filing Prohibition, and 7Recommendations. JCAR also voted an Objection to an agency's enforcement of a rule that wasinconsistent with statute.

(NOTE: Differences between the number of rules proposed and rules considered occur because rulesthat agencies propose near the end of one calendar year are considered by JCAR in the next.)

Some of the more notable rulemakings on which JCAR took action during 2018 follow.

GENERAL RULEMAKING

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD – Practice and Procedure for Appeals Before theProperty Tax Appeal Board (86 Ill. Adm. Code 1910; 42 Ill. Reg. 3862)

PTAB proposed a rulemaking implementing an Executive Order that prohibited members of theGeneral Assembly from representing clients in PTAB proceedings. JCAR objected to and prohibitedfiling of the rulemaking because the Board had no statutory authority to take the action embodied inthis rulemaking and also found that this rulemaking represents a threat to the public interest. PTABwithdrew the rulemaking in response to the Objection and Filing Prohibition.

GAMING BOARD – Video Gaming (General) (11 Ill. Adm. Code 1800; 41 Ill. Reg. 12670)

IGB proposed rules establishing criteria for licensure under the Riverboat Gambling Act as criteria forvideo gaming licensure by IGB. It also added a definition of prima facie case. JCAR objected to therulemaking to allow the Board more time to consider the issues addressed in the context of otherpolicies and procedures and best practices. IGB indicated it would withdraw the rulemaking inresponse to the Objection. The rulemaking was not withdrawn but expired without having beenadopted.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE – Property Tax Code (86 Ill. Adm. Code 110; 41 Ill. Reg.15043)

DOR proposed rules requiring property tax assessments on pollution control facilities to be publishedon the agency's website, instead of in the State newspaper. JCAR objected to the rulemaking becauseit was contrary to Sec. 8-35 of the Property Tax Code [35 ILCS 200], which requires publication ofproperty tax assessments in the State newspaper. DOR withdrew the rulemaking in response to theObjection.

10

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES – Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Treatment andIntervention Licenses (77 Ill. Adm. Code 2060; 41 Ill. Reg. 14878)

DHS proposed rules outlining the procedure by which it would establish reimbursement rates forsubstance use disorder treatment. JCAR objected to the Department's failure to fulfill the mandate ofP.A. 100-23 that it adopt a methodology in rule increasing payment rates for licensed community-based substance abuse treatment providers within 30 days after the 7/6/17 effective date of the PublicAct. DHS agreed that the rule had not been timely filed and revised the rulemaking to provide moredetail regarding the methodology for rate increases.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – Wholesale DrugDistribution Licensing Act (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1510)

JCAR recommended that, if DFPR believes the Wholesale Drug Distribution Licensing Act [225 ILCS120] should apply to drugs for animal use as well as drugs for human use, it seek a change in statuteextending the scope of that Act to include animal drugs. Sec. 5 of the Act currently states that the Actapplies only to the distribution of human prescription drugs. In the alternative, DFPR should remove,from Sec. 10 of its rules titled Wholesale Drug Distribution Licensing Act (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1510),the inclusion of veterinarians in the definition of "practitioner".

POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD – Emissions Reduction Market System (35 Ill. Adm.Code 205; 42 Ill. Reg. 6572)

PCB proposed a rulemaking abolishing the ERMS program effective 4/30/18. JCAR objected to thisrulemaking because it sets a retroactive sunset date for the system that predates any possible adoptiondate for this rulemaking JCAR also objected to the EPA's implementation of the policy stated in thisrulemaking prior to the rulemaking's adoption by PCB, and recommended that, if PCB and EPAbelieve this program is no longer warranted, it seek repeal of Sec. 9.8 of the Environmental ProtectionAct, which requires EPA to design and carry out an emissions reductions market program. PCBresponded that it did not agree with either the Objection or the Recommendation. JCAR then issued aNotice of Failure to Remedy.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES – Medicaid Community Mental Health ServicesProgram (Repealer) (59 Ill. Adm. Code 132; 42 Ill. Reg. 7322); Medicaid Community MentalHealth Services Program (59 Ill. Adm. Code 132; 42 Ill. Reg. 7408)

DHS proposed repeal and replacement of its Medicaid Community Mental Health Services programrules. The new Part omitted provisions from the former Part regarding covered services andreimbursement. DHS indicated these provisions would be moved to the Department of Healthcareand Family Services' Medical Payment rules (89 Ill. Adm. Code 140). JCAR recommended that DHSdelay adopting these rulemakings until HFS was ready to adopt related amendments to 89 Ill. Adm.Code 140 addressing Medicaid coverage issues that are no longer included in this new Part 132, andfurther recommended that DHS and HFS, to the greatest extent possible, ensure consistency between

11

these rulemakings. DHS responded that it would seek consistency with HFS rules, but did not delayadoption of its rulemakings, which were effective 1/1/19. JCAR then issued a Notice of Failure toRemedy.

NATURAL RESOURCES – Public Use of State Parks and Other Properties of theDepartment of Natural Resources (17 Ill. Adm. Code 110; 42 Ill. Reg. 7905)

DNR proposed rules implementing the Adopt a Trail program and requiring program volunteers toundergo criminal background checks. JCAR recommended that, if DNR believes that volunteers onDNR property should be examined for criminal background, it seek statutory authority authorizing, andsetting parameters for, criminal history background checks for volunteers. In response, DNR removedthe background check provisions from the rulemaking.

12

13

NUMBER OFAGENCY RULEMAKINGS

Department on Aging 3

Department of Agriculture 11

Attorney General 2

Auditor General 1

Capital Development Board 4

Central Management Services 3

Chief Procurement Officer-Higher Education 1Department of Children and Family Services 8Civil Service Commission 1Commerce Commission 11Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity 8Community College Board 5Comptroller 2Department of Corrections 1Division of Specialized Care for Children 2State Board of Education 7State Board of Elections 1Emergency Management Agency 3Department of Employment Security 23Environmental Protection Agency 12Executive Ethics Commission 1Department of Financial and Professional Regulation 11State Fire Marshal 7Gaming Board 2

Health Facilities and Services Review Board 1Department of Healthcare and Family Services 21Board of Higher Education 3Department of Human Rights 1Department of Human Services 24Department of Innovation and Technology 1Department of Insurance 40State Board of Investment 2Department of Labor 2Liquor Control Commission 1Department of Natural Resources 28Pollution Control Board 12

2018GENERAL RULEMAKINGSPROPOSED BY AGENCIES

14

Property Tax Appeals Board 2Department of Public Health 24Racing Board 11Department of Revenue 30Secretary of State 17State Employees Retirement System 2Department of State Police 3State Universities Retirement System 1Illinois Student Assistance Commission 8Teachers' Retirement System 2Department of Transportation 6Treasurer 9

TOTAL 381

15


Department on Aging 6

Department of Agriculture 1

Attorney General 2

Auditor General 1



Department of Children and Family Services 7

Civil Service Commission 1

Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity 9

Illinois Commerce Commission 3

Community College Board 5

Comptroller 2

Division of Specialized Care for Children 2

State Board of Education 14

State Board of Elections 4

Illinois Emergency Management Agency 3

Department of Employment Security 7

Environmental Protection Agency 18

Executive Ethics Commission 1

Department of Financial and Professional Regulation 17

Office of the State Fire Marshal 7

Illinois Gaming Board 1

Governor's Office of Management and Budget 2

Health Facilities and Services Review Board 5

Department of Healthcare and Family Services 19

Board of Higher Education 2

Illinois Housing Development Authority 1

Department of Human Rights 1

Department of Human Services 22

Department of Innovation and Technology 1

2018GENERAL RULEMAKINGS

CONSIDERED BY JCAR

16

Department of Insurance 34

State Board of Investment 2

Department of Labor 1

Liquor Control Commission 2

Department of Natural Resources 25

Pollution Control Board 7

Property Tax Appeals Board 1

Department of Public Health 16

Illinois Racing Board 5

State Employees Retirement System 2

State Universities Retirement System 1

Teachers Retirement System 2

Department of Revenue 22

Secretary of State 13

Department of State Police 4

State Universities Civil Service System 1

Illinois Student Assistance Commission 7

Department of Transportation 12

Treasurer 5

TOTAL 337

17

AGENCY TOTAL

Department of Employment Security 3 3

Department of Financial and Professional Regulation 1 1

Illinois Gaming Board 1 1

Governor's Office of Management and Budget 1 1

Department of Human Services 2 1 3

Department of Natural Resources 1 1 2

Pollution Control Board 1 1

Property Tax Appeals Board 1 1

Department of Revenue 1 1

7 4 1 2 14

2018GENERAL RULEMAKINGS:

JCAR ACTION

REC OBJ

OBJ/

PROH

REMOVED

FROM NO

OBJECTION

LIST

18

Number of PercentageBasis for Prohibition Prohibitions of Total

Lack of statutory authority 1 100%

Number of PercentageBasis for Objection Objections of Total

Lack of timeliness/missed statutory deadline 1 25%

Conflict with statute 2 50%

Policy outside of rule 1 25%

TOTAL 4 100%

Number of PercentageBasis for Recommendation Recommendations of Total

Lack of timeliness 4 57%

Coordinate with other agency's corresponding rule 2 29%

Seek statutory authority 1 14%

TOTAL 7 100%

2018GENERAL RULEMAKINGS:

BASIS FOR JCAR ACTION

19

EMERGENCY RULEMAKING

Section 5-45 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act specifies that agencies may use this shortform rulemaking procedure, in which a rule is adopted without prior opportunity for public andJCAR comment, only if the agency finds that an emergency exists that requires the adoption of arule within fewer days than normally required. The agency must state the emergency situation inwriting and make an effort to notify the affected public. An emergency rule becomes effectiveimmediately upon filing with the Secretary of State, or at a stated date less than 10 days after filing,and is effective for up to 150 days, after which a general rulemaking must be adopted if the policyis to continue. No emergency rule may be adopted more than once in any 24-month period unlessstatute specifies otherwise.

In 2018, JCAR reviewed 40 emergency rules and issued 5 Objections and 1 Suspension.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – Rules forAdministration of the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program (68 Ill. Reg.1290; 42 Ill. Reg. 23202)

JCAR objected to and suspended any provision of this rulemaking that does not directly implementthe Opioid Alternative Pilot Program established by P.A.100-1114. The P.A. explicitly authorizedthe use of emergency rulemaking for the creation of the Pilot Program, but not the other changes tothe Medical Cannabis Pilot Program that DFPR has included in the emergency rule. JCAR foundthat this inappropriate use of emergency rulemaking poses a threat to the public interest bychanging basic tenets of the Medical Cannabis Program without public review and input, andwithout any justification being offered by the agency for this use of emergency rulemaking. DFPRagreed to modify the rule by removing the suspended provisions.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES – Licensing Standards for DayCare Homes (89 Ill. Adm. Code 406; 42 Ill. Reg. 8519), Licensing Standards for Day CareCenters (89 Ill. Adm. Code 407; 42 Ill. Reg. 8555), and Licensing Standards for Group DayCare Homes (89 Ill. Adm. Code 408; 42 Ill. Reg. 8593)

DCFS adopted emergency rules effective 5/9/18 requiring that drinking water supplies in day carehomes and centers built prior to 1/1/2000 be tested for lead, and that mitigation plans beimplemented if lead levels above 2.0 ppb are detected. JCAR objected to the Department's use ofemergency rulemaking and to the Department's implementation of the lead testing policy beforerules were adopted. P.A. 99-922, which required lead testing in day care facilities, becameeffective on 1/17/17 and required DCFS to adopt lead testing and mitigation rules by 1/1/18.Although DCFS notified day care licensing staff and providers on 12/6/17 that the lead testingpolicy was effective immediately, it did not start the rulemaking process for another 5 months andthen used emergency rulemaking to implement the policy. Any emergency situation addressed by

20

this rule is agency created. DCFS responded that it would be more mindful of the proper use ofemergency rulemaking in the future. The emergency rules expired on 10/5/18 and the lead testingpolicies were adopted by regular rulemaking effective 1/1/19.

LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING AND STANDARDS BOARD – Surcharge FundFinancial Assistance (20 Ill. Adm. Code 1700; 42 Ill. Reg. 7972)

LETSB adopted an emergency rule implementing P.A. 99-352, effective 1/1/16, which removed aprohibition on grants for in-car police cameras to municipalities that use red light enforcementcameras and removed other restrictions on police camera grants. JCAR objected to the Board'suse of emergency rulemaking because the Board did not adopt the emergency rule until 4/25/18,almost 2½ years after the P.A. became effective, and any emergency situation that existed hadbeen created by the Board's failure to act in a timely manner. LETSB agreed to be better preparedin the future for any needed changes to its rules.

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Public Information, Rulemaking andOrganization (2 Ill. Adm. Code 1975; 42 Ill. Reg. 12336)

IHDA adopted emergency rules that imposed restrictions on public participation and comment atits board meetings. JCAR objected to the Authority's use of emergency rulemaking because IHDAhad not adequately demonstrated the existence of a threat to the public interest, safety or welfaresufficient to justify adopting restrictions on public participation in IHDA meetings when theserestrictions had not been subject to a public comment period. IHDA repealed the emergency rule.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (89Ill. Adm. Code 112; 42 Ill. Reg. 18495)

DHS adopted an emergency rule implementing a P.A. that increased monthly TANF grants. JCARobjected to the Department's use of emergency rulemaking because Sec. 4-2(h) of the Public AidCode [305 ILCS 5] prohibits the use of emergency rulemaking to increase TANF grants andP.A.100-587, which required the increase in TANF grants, did not specifically authorize DHS touse emergency rulemaking for this purpose. DHS agreed to adopt future TANF rules inaccordance with Sec. 4-2(h) of the Code. The increase was adopted by regular rulemakingeffective 12/20/18.

SECRETARY OF STATE – Grant Application and Award Procedures – CensusParticipation and Immigrant Community Assistance Grants (89 Ill. Adm. Code 1500; 42Ill. Reg. 18511)

SOS adopted an emergency rule implementing 2 grant programs for which funds wereappropriated to SOS by P.A. 100-586 (FY 2019 State Budget): $1.5 million for grants toencourage federal census participation and $2.5 million for grants to assist immigrant communitiesin navigating government services. JCAR recommended that this emergency rule and theconcurrent permanent rulemaking be amended to contain more specific information about theadministration of these grants, including, but not limited to, the application evaluation and approval

21








Housing Development Authority 2


Law Enforcement Standards and Training Board 1





Student Assistance Commission 7


TOTAL 36

2018EMERGENCY RULEMAKINGS

ADOPTED BY AGENCIES

22










Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board 1





Illinois Student Assistance Commission 7


TOTAL 40

2018EMERGENCY RULEMAKINGS

CONSIDERED BY JCAR

23

AGENCY REC OBJ OBJ/SUSPENSION

Department of Children and Family Services - 3 -

Department of Financial and Professional Regulation - - 1

Illinois Housing Development Authority - 1 -

Department of Human Services 2 1 -

Law Enforcement Standards and Training Board - 1 -

TOTALS 2 6 1

2018EMERGENCY RULEMAKINGS:

JCAR ACTION

24

Number of PercentageBasis for Recommendation Objections of Total

Coordinate adoption with other agency's corresponding rulemaking 2 100%

TOTAL 2 100%

Number of Percentage

Basis for Objection Objections of Total

Improper use of emergency rulemaking 1 17%

Insufficient emergency 1 17%

Lack of timeliness 4 67%

TOTAL 6 100%

Number of Percentage

Basis for Objection/Suspension Obj/Suspensions of Total

Improper use of emergency rulemaking 1 100%

TOTAL 1 100%

2018EMERGENCY RULEMAKINGS:

BASIS FOR JCAR ACTION

25

PEREMPTORY & EXEMPT RULEMAKING

Section 5-50 of the Administrative Procedure Act specifies that agencies may use this form ofrulemaking procedure, in which the rule is adopted without prior opportunity for public and JCARcomment, only if the rulemaking is required by federal law, federal regulations, court orders orcollective bargaining agreements; if the agency cannot exercise any discretion with respect to the rulecontent; and under conditions that preclude compliance with general rulemaking requirements.Agencies must file the peremptory rule with the Secretary of State within 30 days after the change inrules is required.

Exempt rulemaking is a specialized form of rulemaking, similar to the peremptory rulemaking process,reserved for use by the Pollution Control Board (PCB) under the Environmental Protection Act [415ILCS 5] and by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) under the Radiation ProtectionAct [420 ILCS 40]. PCB and IEMA can use this short form procedure only to adopt Illinoisregulations that are "identical in substance" to mandated federal regulations.

JCAR considered 17 peremptory or exempt rulemakings in 2018 and voted no actions.

26


Central Management Services 1Emergency Management Agency 2Department of Human Services 1Pollution Control Board 30

TOTAL 34

2018PEREMPTORY/EXEMPT RULEMAKINGS

ADOPTED BY AGENCIES

27


Central Management Services (P) 2Illinois Emergency Management Agency (X) 2Department of Human Services (P) 1Pollution Control Board (X) 12

TOTAL 17

2018PEREMPTORY/EXEMPT RULEMAKINGS

CONSIDERED BY JCAR

28

AGENCY REC OBJ SUSPENSION

TOTAL 0 0 0

2018PEREMPTORY/EXEMPT RULEMAKINGS:

JCAR ACTION

29

REQUIRED RULEMAKING

Section 5-15 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act requires that each agency maintain as rulescertain types of basic information about the agency and its rulemaking process. For example, theagency must include a description of its organizational structure; procedures by which the public canobtain information concerning the agency's programs, including Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)procedures; and a current description of the agency's rulemaking procedures and research tools for itsbody of rules. An agency may also adopt rules that incorporate material by reference and adopt rulesthat specify the qualifications of administrative law judges by using the required rulemaking process.Section 5-15 authorizes agencies to bypass the proposed rulemaking process and file a certified copyof a required rule with the Secretary of State for publication in the Illinois Register as an adoptedrulemaking. JCAR reviews required rules after, rather than before, they are adopted.

JCAR considered 10 required rulemakings in 2018 and took no actions.

30


Auditor General 1Capital Development Board 2Central Management Services 2Division of Specialized Care for Children 1Department of Military Affairs 2

TOTAL 8

2018REQUIRED RULEMAKINGS

ADOPTED BY AGENCIES

31


Attorney General 1

Auditor General 1



Division of Specialized Care for Children 1

Department of Military Affairs 1

TOTAL 8

2018REQUIRED RULEMAKINGS

CONSIDERED BY JCAR

32

AGENCY REC OBJ SUSPENSION

TOTAL 0 0 0

2018REQUIRED RULEMAKINGS:

JCAR ACTION

33

AGENCY DU

E T

O A

PP

RO

PR

IAT

E

AG

EN

CY

RE

SP

ON

SE

, NO

FU

RT

HE

R A

CT

ION

FA

ILU

RE

TO

RE

ME

DY

NO

FU

RT

HE

R J

CA

R A

CT

ION

JC

AR

WIL

L M

ON

ITO

R

WIT

HD

RE

W S

US

PE

NS

ION

OR

PR

OH

IBIT

ION


Governor's Office of Management and Budget 1



Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board 1


State Toll Highway Authority 1

TOTAL 11 0 0 0 0

2018

JCAR ASSESSMENT OF

APPROPRIATENESS OF AGENCY RESPONSETO JCAR ACTION

ASSESSMENT

34

35

Legislation Related to Rulemaking Issues

Rulemakings considered by JCAR occasionally result in Objections or Recommendations based onlack of clear statutory authority, or written agreements with agencies to pursue legislation to clarifystatute, resolve ambiguities, or seek specific statutory authority. The following are instances in whichlegislation considered during 2018 was prompted by a rulemaking issue, or in which suggestions toaddress statutory issues (if the agency is to pursue the proposed policy) were made by JCAR during2018.

P.A. 100-414 (SB 768), effective 8/25/17, renews the Clinical Social Work and Social WorkPractice Act until 1/1/28. Among its provisions is a requirement that the Department of Financial andProfessional Regulation prescribe forms for license applications and other purposes that are"consistent with and reflecting the requirements of this Act and rules adopted pursuant to this Act".The provision appears to have been prompted by recent instances in which other State agenciesattempted to incorporate policies outside of rule in standardized forms.

P.A. 100-1085 (SB 3290), effective 1/1/19, amends the Public Aid Code to require the Departmentof Healthcare and Family Services to provide every nursing home enrolled in one or more Medicaidmanaged care networks with the corresponding patient credit file at the same time HFS provides thefile to the applicable Medicaid managed care organization (MCO). The measure is intended to reducethe incidence of claim denials resulting from coverage plan errors. In 2017, HFS adopted amendmentsto 89 IAC 140 specifying the actions to be taken by providers when claims were denied by an MCOdue to inaccurate or updated enrollment information. This rulemaking drew comment from nursinghomes, many of which had experienced significant financial hardship due to MCO claim denials andinconsistent criteria among MCOs for documenting claims. HFS agreed to revisit the claims processafter the rulemaking was adopted, but did not do so.

House floor amendments to SB 1531 would have amended portions of the Public Utilities Act thatconcern marketing, billing and other procedures of alternative retail electric suppliers (ARES). Amongthe proposed changes was replacing the term "electric service provider" with "alternative retail electricsupplier" for consistency throughout the Act. In 2015, the Illinois Commerce Commission proposedrules (83 Ill. Adm. Code 465; 39 Ill. Reg. 6134) addressing the practice of net metering (billingcustomers who generate their own power for the difference between the power they generate and thepower they purchase). JCAR objected to portions of this rulemaking that used and defined the term"electricity supplier" inconsistent with the Act. The bill would have resolved this discrepancy in statute.The House version of this bill did not receive a floor vote and died with the adjournment of the 100th

GA.

36

37

Legislation Related to the IAPAThe following are issues related to the IAPA, or issues that directly affected rulemaking procedures,that engendered or were associated with legislation proposed or considered during the 2018 session.

P.A. 100-688 (HB 5253) amended IAPA Sec. 5-30 to require that agencies include economic impactanalyses in their First Notice filings for any rulemaking that may adversely impact small businesses. Theanalysis must identify industries that will have to comply with the proposed rule by their NAICS 2-digitcodes (e.g., 11 for agriculture/forestry, 21 for mining, 31-33 for manufacturing) and identify thecategories of business activity that will be impacted (e.g., hiring, purchasing, insurance, licensing fees,equipment/material needs, training, recordkeeping, compensation/benefits). DCEO also shall place onits website notification of all proposed rules affecting small businesses (defined as businesses withfewer than 50 full-time employees or less than $4M in gross annual sales), together with the FlinnReport summaries of those proposed rules.

P.A. 100-581 (SB 1773) added a new Sec. 5-46.3 to the IAPA prohibiting HFS from filing, SOSfrom accepting, and JCAR from considering any rules related to hospital transformation (changing,adding or eliminating services to better align with community needs) unless those rules have beenapproved with signatures by at least 9 of the 14 members of the Hospital Transformation ReviewCommittee created by the P.A. The P.A. also authorized HFS to use emergency rulemaking for theinitial enactment of provisions related to hospital transformation, payments to hospitals for graduatemedical education programs, hospital assessments, and rates paid to hospitals for various services. Italso authorized HFS to use peremptory rulemaking to amend hospital access payments retroactive tothe effective date of the Act, but only to the extent necessary to conform to federally approved StatePlan Amendments.

P.A. 100-1030 (HB 3040) amended Sec. 5-20 of the IAPA to exclude from the definition of anagency required to adopt policy in rule the Illinois State Guard, with respect to regulations adoptedunder the Illinois State Guard Act [20 ILCS 1815]. The State Guard is defined in the P.A. as an"unorganized" militia consisting of all residents ages 18 to 45 and other persons as determined by theGovernor. It does not refer to the Illinois National Guard or the Department of Military Affairs, whichhave habitually adopted rules. Previously, Sec. 5-20 excluded the General Assembly, its committees,the Governor, Supreme and Appellate Court justices and judges, the Legislative Ethics Commission,and the Architect of the Capitol from the definition of agency.

HB 5982 would have amended Secs. 5-30, 5-40, 5-45, 5-100 and 5-115 of the IAPA to establishan automatic prohibition/suspension mechanism for rules whose compliance or implementation costexceeded $10M. Agencies would accept implementation cost estimates from private sector entitiesduring 1st Notice and include these estimates in their 2nd Notice filings. Regulatory flexibilityconsiderations that the IAPA currently applies to small businesses, small municipalities and nonprofitswould be extended to all private sector entities (not defined in the legislation). Any proposed rulewhose estimated total implementation or compliance cost to private sector entities exceeded $10Mover 2 years was to be "deemed objectionable and automatically prohibited" by JCAR; emergencyrules with an implementation cost of $10M or more over the life of the emergency rule would be

38

automatically suspended. The prohibition or suspension could be lifted via legislation passed by theGeneral Assembly and signed by the Governor within 180 days after the action; otherwise, theprohibition or suspension becomes permanent. (The bill did not state whether JCAR had authority tolift a prohibition or suspension imposed for this reason.) The bill also increased the term of 2nd Noticeextensions from 45 to 90 days (allowing for a maximum 2nd Notice period of 135 days), requiredCOGFA to adjust the $10M cost threshold for inflation on an annual basis, and authorized JCAR torequest independent implementation/compliance cost estimates for rules from the Auditor General.This bill was not acted upon during the 2018 session, but has been reintroduced in the 101st GA.

SB 3525 would have added a new IAPA Sec. 5-170 providing that, no later than 10/1/18, theExecutive Directors of JCAR and LIS jointly study and report to the GA on the feasibility and cost ofdeveloping an online searchable database system for storing public comment received by Stateagencies on proposed rules. The report was to include an estimate of the cost of the project and ofhow many additional staff may be needed to maintain the database; cybersecurity concerns; how thisdatabase can increase transparency and reduce confusion during the First and Second Notice periods;and any other issues the directors deem relevant. No action was taken on this bill.

39

Public Act Review

Section 5-105 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act [5 ILCS 100/5-105] requires JCAR tomaintain a review program to monitor the implementation of new laws and changes in law throughState agency rulemaking activities. JCAR fulfills this statutory obligation through its Public Act reviewprogram.

Under this program, JCAR staff reviews each new Public Act and makes a preliminary determinationas to whether rulemaking might be necessary for proper implementation. After the list has been culledof those obviously not requiring rulemaking (appropriations, criminal and civil law, local governmentissues), the affected State agency is contacted for its opinion. If necessary, these written contacts arefollowed up with discussion between JCAR and the agency.

The final list of Public Acts for which JCAR and the agency agree that rulemaking is warranted is thenmonitored as long as necessary to insure that progress is made toward implementation. The primarygoal of this program is to ensure that appropriate rules are put into effect in a timely manner, asrequired by Section 5-105 of the IAPA.

If suitable progress is not made, JCAR, by the vote of a majority of its members, can initiate aninvestigation into existing rules of the agency. If, after the agency's appearance before the Committeeto explain its failure to adopt anticipated rules, the JCAR members are not satisfied with the agencyresponse, the Committee can object to the agency's conduct and may initiate further legislation toclarify the issue.

Frequently an agency is prompted to complete necessary rulemaking by conversation with JCAR.

40

41

In 2004, JCAR audited the rules of all agencies to determine whether the agency had adopted theAmericans With Disabilities Act grievance procedures required by federal law. Federal regulations at28 CFR 35.107 require all agencies of State government employing at least 50 persons to adopt rulesgoverning the grievance procedure. Twenty-two agencies appeared to have no ADA rules and werecontacted to determine whether the agency had a valid reason for considering itself exempt from thefederal mandate. Of those, 19 responded by adopting ADA rules or explaining that they have fewerthan the 50 employees that trigger the federal requirement. At least the following agencies have not yetfiled ADA rules:

Healthcare and Family Services Juvenile Justice

Special Review ofADA Procedures

42

43

Freedom of Information Act RulesP.A. 96-542, which took effect on 1/1/10, amended the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [5 ILCS140] to require greater disclosure of public documents, faster response to requests for information anddocuments, and stronger civil penalties for public bodies that fail to comply with the law. The Act alsoestablished within the Office of the Attorney General the position of Public Access Counselor, whoseduties include hearing appeals from requesters denied information or from public bodies claimingrequested information should be exempt from disclosure.

The changes to FOIA required State agencies to revise or replace their existing FOI rules. Newprovisions shorten the timeline for responding to an initial request from 7 to 5 business days; requireeach agency to provide contact information for a designated FOI officer; require annual training forFOI officers; revise the schedule of fees that may be charged for copying documents; and directappeals, when requests are denied, to the Public Access Counselor.

Many State agencies have implemented the 2010 FOIA revisions by either amending their current rulesor replacing them with a model rule drafted by the Governor's office. Most agencies have adoptedtheir FOIA rules using the required rulemaking provisions in Section 5-15 of the IAPA, which apply toprocedures by which the public can obtain information on subjects, programs, and activities of anagency. At least the following major State agencies have not yet adopted rules reflecting the newFOIA revisions:

AgingAgricultureCentral Management ServicesChildren and Family ServicesCivil Service CommissionCommerce and Economic OpportunityCommerce CommissionComptrollerFinance AuthorityGaming BoardHealthcare and Family ServicesHuman ServicesInsuranceLabor

Lt. GovernorLotteryProcurement Policy BoardRetirement SystemsRevenueSecretary of StateState Board of ElectionsState Fire MarshalState PoliceToll Highway AuthorityVeterans' AffairsViolence Prevention AuthorityWorkers' Compensation Commission

44

45

Complaint Review ProgramThe Illinois Administrative Procedure Act authorizes JCAR to review and investigate the rulemakingactivities of State agencies when it receives a written complaint.

JCAR operates its complaint review program under Part 260 of its operational rules. Complaints mayaddress one or more of the following: an existing rules of an agency: failure of an agency to fully orproperly enforce its rules; absence of rules required by statute or necessary for the proper conduct ofan agency program or function; and an agency policy that is applied, but not embodied in the rules ofthe agency promulgated pursuant to the IAPA.

Upon receipt of a complaint, JCAR initiates and review to determine the need for a full investigation.Staff may raise questions and discuss problems with the agency and will attempt to inform the agencyof the substance of the complaint and any proposals for JCAR action prior to the meeting. Staff willreport the results of the review and a proposal for action at a JCAR monthly meeting. A complaintmay be placed on the agenda for a JCAR meeting by any JCAR member or the Executive Director ifevidence exists that there are possible problems with the rules. If the same issues have been previouslyconsidered by JCAR, a complaint will not be placed on the agenda, unless the complaint revealsinformation not available to JCAR at the time the issue was considered and, if the information wereavailable, it would have altered the outcome. Based on the complaint, JCAR may issue an Objectionor Recommendation to existing rule, or to agency failure to maintain adequate rule, and afford theagency an opportunity to respond.

Complaints should be forwarded to the Executive Director of the Joint Committee at:

Joint Committee on Administrative Rules700 Stratton BuildingSpringfield IL 62706

2018 Complaint Review

In April 2018, JCAR received a complaint against Department of Natural Resources Herptiles-HerpsAct [510 ILCS 68] rules. Generally, the complaint was concerned that, while the rules requiresubmission of an application provided by DNR, DNR had not designed or published the application.the complainant also pointed various others instance of where the rules, and apparently this regulatoryprogram, lacks sufficient specificity. After conversation with the complainant, JCAR transmitted thecomplainant's concerns to DNR and requested a response from the Agency. After numerousprompting from JCAR, on 2/25/19, DNR responded in writing that it had been tardy in making theseapplication forms available. DNR now has the application available online and is reviewing its Herptile-Herps Act rules and its rules on General Scientific Permits based on the complainants concerns to atthis writing, JCAR is continuing to monitor DNR's progress.

46

47

Since JCAR's function is closely related to the interpretation of the Illinois Administrative ProcedureAct (IAPA), it monitors court decisions and Attorney General opinions that affect the interpretation ofthe Act. One of the enumerated responsibilities of JCAR under the Act is "to study the impact oflegislative changes, court rulings and administrative action on agency rules and rulemaking" [5 ILCS100/5-105(c)]. This summary highlights significant judicial actions since enactment of the IAPA anddiscusses current activity.

KEY INTERPRETATIONS OF THE IAPA

Two past decisions construing the IAPA in accordance with positions supported by JCAR areespecially noteworthy. The cases involved an attempt by the Department of Public Aid (now,Healthcare and Family Services) to change the method by which it calculated Medicaidpayments to nursing homes. In the first case, Senn Park I (Senn Park Nursing Center v.Miller, 118 Ill. App. 3d 504, 455 N.E.2d 153, 74 Ill. Dec. 123 (1983)), the First DistrictAppellate Court held that DPA's failure to follow the IAPA rulemaking procedures invalidateda new method it utilized for calculating Medicaid payments. The court stated that the definitionof a "rule" found in Sec. 1-70 of the IAPA should be broadly construed in order to safeguardthe public's right to comment on proposed agency policies. DPA's change in calculating theMedicaid payments, the court ruled, fell within the Sec. 1-70 definition of rule since it was astatement of general agency policy. As that policy was not adopted in compliance with theIAPA, it was invalid.

DPA also argued that the amended procedure was exempt from the notice and publicationrequirements by Sec. 5-35(c) of the IAPA because the State Plan was a contractualarrangement with the federal government, and was exempt under the contracts exception of theIAPA. Sec. 5-35(c) states that: "The notice and publication requirements of this Section do notapply to a matter relating solely to agency management…or to public property, loans orcontracts."

Senn Park II (Senn Park Nursing Center v. Miller, 118 Ill. App. 3d 733, 455 N.E.2d 162,83 Ill. Reg. 609 (1983)) addressed use of emergency rulemaking. The Appellate Court ruledthat an emergency rule in that instance in which the underlying "emergency" was created by theagency's failure to follow these (notice and comment) procedures (of the IAPA) in the firstplace, resulting from "an avoidable administrative failure to properly enact a rule in accordancewith statutory requirements", was improper in that instance.

Both cases were consolidated for consideration by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Courtagreed with the Appellate Court's interpretation of the contract's exception in which the lowercourt stated:

Judicial Activity Relating ToJCAR and IAPA

48

We are persuaded that under the IAPA, a matter comes under the contract exception onlywhen contracts are clearly and directly involved…. We believe that with regard to nursinghomes, contracts, whether State-Federal or agency-provider, are not clearly and directlyinvolved.... Accordingly, we conclude that the amended inflation update procedure is not amatter relating to contracts within the meaning of the IAPA. (118 Ill. App. 3d at 511)

The Supreme Court also stated that it is clear that the rulemaking procedure is intended to giveinterested persons an opportunity to submit their views and comments on rulemaking changesand that an agency must consider all submissions received. The court acknowledged that thereare certain statutory exceptions to the notice and comment procedures, but that exceptions areof a limited nature and should be appropriately applied.

The court also agreed with the Appellate Court ruling that the amended inflation updateprocedure fell within the purview of the IAPA because the Public Aid Code incorporates theIAPA and the Code specifically requires rulemaking pursuant to the IAPA "during the processof establishing the payment rate for skilled nursing and intermediate care services, or when asubstantial change in rates is proposed," in order to provide "an opportunity for public reviewand comment on the proposed rates prior to their becoming effective" (118 Ill. App. 3d at512). The court found that the amended procedure fell within the definition of "rule" found inthe IAPA and thus the failure of DPA to follow the notice and comment procedures required bythe IAPA rendered the amended procedure invalid.

Following the decision of the Appellate Court in Senn Park I, DPA promulgated EmergencyRule 4.14221 implementing the amended inflation update procedure pursuant to the IAPA.Plaintiffs (Senn Park II) sought a declaratory judgment, asking the court to declare EmergencyRule 4.14221 void because there was no "emergency" as that term is defined in the IAPA. On12/30/80, DPA withdrew the emergency rule. On appeal, the Appellate Court held that,although the rule was withdrawn, the validity of the rule was at issue in order to determine theamount of reimbursement the plaintiffs were entitled to in Senn Park I. The Appellate Courtfurther held that the circuit court had erred in finding the emergency rule valid because therewas no emergency as that term is defined under the IAPA. The Supreme Court ruled that noemergency situation existed warranting use of emergency rulemaking.

In Sleeth v. Illinois Department of Public Aid (125 Ill. App. 3d 847, 466 N.E.2d 703, 81Ill. Dec. 117 (1984)), the Third District Appellate Court considered an appeal from a DPAdecision to terminate disability benefits in 5 cases. The court found that the procedure utilizedby the Department (Manual Release No. 83.5), which required applicants who were denieddisability benefits to submit proof of disability within 14 days after the filing of appeal, was a"rule" under the IAPA. The IAPA states:

"Rule" means each agency statement of general applicability that implements, applies,interprets, or prescribes law or policy, but does not include (i) statements concerningonly the internal management of an Agency and not affecting private rights orprocedures available to persons or entities outside the Agency, (iii) intra-agencymemoranda or (iv) the prescription of standardized forms...

49

DPA contended the Manual Release was merely an intra-office memorandum, not subject tothe IAPA. The court reasoned that the memorandum affected private rights and proceduresavailable to persons outside DPA and that this type of statement by an agency is specificallyincluded within the definition of "rule" under the Act. Since the memorandum was not properlypromulgated pursuant to the IAPA, the court held the rule invalid and determined that theprocedures followed by DPA violated State law.

In Kaufman Grain Co., Inc. v. Director, Department of Agriculture (179 Ill. App. 3d 1040,534 N.E.2d 1259, 128 Ill. Dec. 654 (1989)), the Fourth District Appellate Court held thatDOA had no statute or rule that allowed it to settle disputes between a grain producer and agrain dealer or a grain warehouse. DOA improperly relied on policy that was not properlypromulgated as rules in accordance with the IAPA and, therefore, was without authority toadjudicate such grain disputes. The Kaufman case is significant for the ruling of the courtconcerning attorney's fees. Sec. 10-55 of the IAPA provides that, in any case in which a partyhas any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason, the court shall award the partybringing the action the reasonable expenses of the litigation, including reasonable attorney'sfees. The appellate court ruled that Kaufman was entitled to the award of attorney's fees itreasonably incurred in this litigation, including the fees incurred in the proceedings before theDepartment. The court stated that Sec. 10-55 of the IAPA gives those subject to regulation anincentive to oppose doubtful rules where compliance would otherwise be less costly thanlitigation. Therefore, the court awarded fees for the proceedings before DOA, as well as feesincurred in administrative review proceedings, noting that proceedings before an administrativeagency are quite often more costly and time consuming than administrative review proceedings.The Kaufman case illustrated trends of the courts to rule unfavorably against agencies thathave not promulgated their policies properly under the IAPA. The Kaufman decisionspecifically cites Senn Park and further strengthens the precedent it established. Award ofattorney's fees was further strengthened in Citizens Org. Proj. v. Dept. of Nat. Res. (89 Ill.2nd 593, 725 N.E.2d 195, 244 Ill. Dec. 896 (2000)), in which the Supreme Court affirmedthe award of attorney's fees and litigation expenses when a citizen group obtained invalidationof a DNR rule governing a DNR permit decision.

In Coronet Insurance Company v. John E. Washburn, Director of Insurance of the Stateof Illinois (201 Ill. App. 3d 633, 558 N.E.2d 1307, 146 Ill. Dec. 973 (1990)), the FirstDistrict Appellate Court of Illinois held that an administrative agency may enact rules andregulations as limited by the authorizing statutory language; that an administrative rule carrieswith it the same presumption of validity as the statute; and a rule that is consistent with the spiritof the statute and furthers its purpose will be sustained. The appellate court also ruled thatDOI's failure to give an additional 45 days notice of a proposed rule that had been revisedduring the First Notice public comment period to the general public did not constitute violationof the IAPA, since the Act provides that changes in the text of a proposed rule may be madeduring the First Notice period. Such changes need not be published again prior to submissionto JCAR.

50

In CIPS v. Illinois Commerce Commission (268 Ill. App. 3d 471, 644 N.E.2d 817, 206 Ill.Dec. 49 (1994)), the Fourth District Appellate Court ruled that JCAR did not create animpermissible filing prohibition when it informed ICC it would lift its filing prohibition on aproposed rule formulating rental rates for cable TV attachments to utility poles if the ICCremoved allocation of the portion of pole neutral space to cable television.

In Weyland v. Manning (309 Ill. App. 3d 542, 723 N.E.2d 387, 243 Ill. Dec. 355 (2000)),plaintiffs filed an action contesting a rule adopted by the Department of Natural Resourcesestablishing a restricted boating zone on Griswold Lake. One element at issue was theadequacy of the Second Notice filed by DNR with JCAR. The Second District AppellateCourt held that DNR complied with JCAR rule requirements that it list and analyze allcomments concerning the rule and that its failure to list in the Second Notice persons who hadrequested a public hearing did not invalidate the rule.

Payday Lending Rules: The regulation of short term (payday or cash for car title) loansinvolved rules ultimately adopted by the then Department of Financial Institutions and/or Officeof Banks and Real Estate. After JCAR Objection and after a Filing Prohibition expired, DFIadopted rules regulating the payday loan/cash for car title industries that were immediatelychallenged in South 51 Development Corp, et al., v. Vega (335 Ill.App. 3d 542, 269 N.E.2d528, 261 Ill. Dec. 731 (2002)). The chief argument of plaintiffs was that there was animproper delegation of rulemaking authority to DFI. The court held that there was a validdelegation of legislative authority (the statute on which the rulemaking was based wassomewhat sparse) and that the small business impact analysis performed at the time by DCCA(now, DCEO) was facially sufficient, albeit not submitted to JCAR by the end of the FirstNotice period.

Corey H. v. Board of Education of City of Chicago (No. 92-C-3409, U.S. District Courtfor the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division). In 1992, disabled students brought anaction against the Chicago and State Boards of Education alleging systemic failures to educatechildren with disabilities in the least restrictive environment (LRE), as required by the federalIndividuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SBE and CBE entered into a settlementagreement with the plaintiffs. Under the settlement agreement, Judge Gettleman ordered SBEto change its policy on certification structure and standards for special education teachersthrough peremptory rulemaking. SBE filed 2 peremptory rulemakings to change specialeducation teacher certification endorsement and create common core standards for allteachers. The first peremptory rule (titled Certification; 23 Ill. Adm. Code 25; 24 Ill. Reg.16109) was objected to by JCAR on 11/14/00. SBE refused to withdraw the peremptory rule,stating it was not in a position to do so because it was under a federal judge's order. The rulewas then suspended by JCAR on 2/21/01. The second peremptory rule (Standards forCertification in Special Education; 23 Ill. Adm. Code 28; 24 Ill. Reg. 16738) was objected toand suspended by JCAR on 1/9/01. SBE did not respond. On 2/27/01, Judge Gettlemanordered SBE to implement both rulemakings, regardless of the JCAR suspensions.

Pursuant to IAPA requirements, SJR 26 was introduced in the General Assembly to continuethe 2 suspensions. (At the time, Sec. 5-125 of the IAPA stated that if a joint resolution passed

51

both houses of the General Assembly within the 180 days of the JCAR suspension, the rulewould be considered repealed and the Secretary of State must immediately remove the rulefrom the collection of the effective rules.) SJR 26 passed the Senate on 5/21/01 with a vote of56-0-0 and passed the House on 5/31/01 with a vote of 117-0-0. This was the first time ajoint resolution of this nature passed both houses of the GA. As directed by Judge Gettleman,SBE implemented the settlement order as agency policy outside rule.

Ten years later, with the enactment of PA 97-461, SBE was authorized to use peremptoryrulemaking procedures to adopt into its rules the court-ordered certification policies andstandards. SBE adopted peremptory rules on 8/22/11, in accordance with the district judge'sorders.

In Champaign-Urbana Public Health District v. ILRB (354 Ill. App. 3d, 482, 821 N.E.2d,691, 290 Ill. Dec. 379 (2004)), the Fourth District Appellate Court ruled that the Illinois LaborRelation Board's use of emergency rulemaking to implement its card recognition rules was notan emergency under the IAPA, despite the fact the agency was implementing a recentlyenacted Public Act with an immediate effective date. The court said no emergency existedbecause union recognition could still occur under the existing methods or the union could waituntil the new permanent rules were promulgated:

"(N)o facts have been presented to show that without the emergency rules the publicwould be confronted with a threatening situation.... The reason for adopting anemergency rule should be truly emergent and persuasive to a reviewing court andconsiderations of administrative and fiscal convenience alone do not satisfy thatstandard. Agencies may not adopt emergency rules to eliminate an administrative needthat does not threaten the public interest, safety, or welfare. Here, the Board'sreasoning for implementing the emergency rules can best be characterized as one foradministrative convenience and not because of any stated public threat. Thus, the rulesadopted by the Board...were invalid...."

A similar finding was reached by the Second District Appellate Court concerning the Board'suse of emergency rulemaking in County of Du Page v. ILRB (358 Ill. App. 3d 174, 830N.E.2d 709, 294 Ill. Dec. 297 (2005)) concerning sheriff's deputies in DuPage County. Inthese 2 instances, courts took a narrower view of the appropriate use of emergency rulemakingthan JCAR's historical position. JCAR has voted procedural Objections or Recommendationswhen agencies have employed emergency rulemaking to implement Public Acts when adequatetime for regular rulemaking was present (the "agency created" emergency situation spoken of inSenn Park), but, up to that time, had seldom taken adverse action because an agency actedpromptly to implement a recent Public Act through emergency rulemaking.

Caro v. Blagojevich (Circuit Court, Cook County, 07-CH-45464) was filed 11/26/07 inCook County challenging the Governor's expansion of medical assistance under Family Care.Plaintiffs sought to halt the HFS Director's continued enforcement and implementation of theHFS emergency rule expanding medical assistance eligibility under Family Care to familiesearning up to 400% FPL, a rule that had been suspended by JCAR on 11/13/07.

52

Plaintiffs argued the rule violated the Illinois Constitution and statutes, including the IAPA. Theysought an injunction against HFS enforcing or implementing the rule. Among the defensesraised by HFS was an argument that the JCAR Suspension was unconstitutional, based oncases from other states supportive of that position.

On 4/15/08, Circuit Judge James Epstein issued a preliminary injunction ordering HFS to ceaseexpending any public funds related to Family Care. Judge Epstein did not rule on theconstitutional issues raised, instead citing HFS failure to include a work requirement as acondition of Family Care eligibility. (Federal and State statutes require medical assistancerecipients to meet the same non-income criteria as TANF recipients, which include workrequirements.) Defendants appealed this injunction to the First District Appellate Court, whichupheld Judge Epstein's decision on 9/26/08.

HFS responded to the order by filing a peremptory rule imposing the work requirement uponFamily Care recipients. JCAR suspended the peremptory rule on 5/20/08 because theinjunction did not direct HFS to file a peremptory rule and the rule did not meet that or any ofthe other IAPA conditions for peremptory rulemaking.

In February 2008, HFS presented to JCAR a proposed permanent version of the ruleexpanding Family Care eligibility. JCAR issued a Filing Prohibition against the rule on 2/26/08.HFS then attempted on 3/10/08 to file the prohibited rule with the Secretary of State, and thisattempt became the subject of a new lawsuit, HFS v. White (below).

On 10/15/08, Judge Epstein issued another preliminary injunction barring HFS from expendingany public funds to implement Family Care under the permanent or peremptory rules. HFSthen claimed that the order could be interpreted in a manner that would force the agency tostop payments on all its medical assistance programs (affecting more than 500,000 Illinoisresidents). Based on HFS' argument, the Illinois Supreme Court, on 11/12/08, issued a stay ofenforcement of the preliminary injunction, allowing HFS to continue implementing the programuntil the merits of the case could be decided.

In December 2008, the Special Investigative Committee of the Illinois House consideringarticles of impeachment against Gov. Blagojevich included Caro among its exhibits. Thearticles of impeachment approved by the House on 1/9/09 and 1/14/09, and sustained by theSenate on 1/29/09, thereby removing Blagojevich from office, included the violation of theIAPA cited in Caro among various charges of abuse of power.

On 7/1/09, Judge Epstein approved a settlement agreement among Gov. Patrick Quinn(replacing Blagojevich as a defendant), all other defendants, and the plaintiffs. The agreementincluded approval of legislation (P.A. 96-20, signed 6/30/09) allowing persons who wereenrolled in the expanded Family Care program as of the legislation's effective date to remain inthe program, with no new enrollees accepted after that date. All pending appeals of the casewere dismissed. HFS filed emergency rules to implement P.A. 96-20 on 7/1/09 and identicalpermanent rules took effect on 11/2/09 and 11/16/09.

53

In Department of Healthcare and Family Services v. White (Circuit Court, Cook County,08-CH-11822), HFS filed suit against Secretary of State White on 3/28/08. HFS, on 3/10/08,attempted to file the proposed Family Care expansion rule that JCAR had prohibited on2/26/08. SOS refused to accept it, citing the Suspension that was still in effect on the earlieremergency rule, which, under the IAPA, prevents any other rule with the same effect frombeing filed. HFS argued that JCAR's Suspension of the emergency rule was invalid and thatSOS had a duty to accept and publish the permanent rule in the Illinois Register. The case wasdismissed at the defendants' request on 7/1/09 as part of the settlement agreement in Caro.

Several cases were filed in Cook County Circuit Court in 2015 and 2016 regarding theDepartment of Public Health's denial of various petitions, submitted under Section 45 of theCompassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act [410 ILCS 130], to addadditional conditions to the list of "debilitating medical conditions" qualifying for medicalcannabis (see 77 Ill. Adm. Code 946.10). As of January 2018, at least 3 cases had beendecided in favor of the plaintiffs at the circuit or appellate court level: Mednick v. IDPH, 16CH 2777, to add intractable pain; Doe v. IDPH, Ill. App. Ct., 1st District, No. 1-16-2548, toadd chronic post-operative pain; and Doe v. IDPH, 15 CH 16764, to add migraineheadaches. IDPH had appealed these decisions to higher courts.

54

55

FIL

ING

PR

OH

IBIT

ION

S A

ND

SU

SP

EN

SIO

NS

IS

SU

ED

BY

JC

AR

2/

1/19

IR =

Illin

ois R

egist

er; I

AC =

Illin

ois A

dmin

istra

tive

Cod

e

DA

TE

A

GE

NC

Y

AC

TIO

N

BA

SIS

IS

SU

E

6/1

6/8

1 H

ealt

h F

in A

uth

4 I

R 1

915

P

rohi

bit

ion

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act/

S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Imp

lem

ents

IH

FA

Act

. Im

pro

per

def

init

ion

of

"ho

spit

al s

erv

ices

"; f

law

ed r

epo

rtin

g re

qui

rem

ents

; p

ayo

r d

iffe

ren

tial

s; t

ries

to

est

abli

sh a

"co

ntin

gent

lia

bil

ity"

agr

eem

ent

wit

h th

e fe

der

al g

ove

rnm

ent.

H

FA

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

4

/13

/82

EP

A/D

PH

4

IR

46

69

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t P

ubli

c w

ater

sup

ply

sam

ple

s; l

and

& w

ater

sam

ple

s; n

ew r

egs

on

mil

k &

mil

k p

rod

ucts

. In

adeq

uate

eco

nom

ic i

mp

act

anal

ysis

; b

urd

enso

me

req

uire

men

ts f

or

was

tew

ater

tes

tin

g la

bo

rato

ries

. E

PA

/DP

H w

ithd

rew

. 1

/8/8

6 D

NS

3

2 I

AC

50

5

9 I

R 1

573

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t/

Fed

eral

Pre

emp

tio

n E

xten

sive

and

bur

den

som

e re

gula

tio

n o

f n

ucle

ar s

team

-gen

erat

ing

faci

liti

es.

DN

S w

ithd

rew

.

9/2

3/8

7 D

PR

6

8 I

AC

25

0

11

IR

383

6

Pro

hib

itio

n L

egis

lati

ve I

nten

t/

Fre

edo

m o

f S

pee

ch/

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act

Lim

itat

ion

on

pre

-nee

d s

oli

cita

tio

n an

d s

ale

of

fune

ral

arra

nge

men

ts.

DP

R w

ithd

rew

.

3/7

/90

DP

R

68

IA

C 1

40

0

13

IR

291

3

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t/

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

R

equi

rem

ents

fo

r cl

inic

al p

sych

olo

gist

lic

ensu

re c

on

flic

ted

wit

h st

atu

te o

r la

cked

sta

tuto

ry

auth

ori

ty.

DP

R m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

9/1

7/9

1 D

CF

S

89

IA

C 3

00

1

5 I

R 8

735

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent

Dis

allo

wed

a s

tatu

tori

ly r

equi

red

Chr

isti

an S

cien

ce e

xem

pti

on

in t

he d

efin

itio

n o

f "n

egle

cted

ch

ild

". D

CF

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

1/8

/92

DO

I 5

0 I

AC

20

08

1

5

IR 1

485

9

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t U

nlaw

ful

dis

crim

inat

ion

agai

nst

the

eld

erly

by

seve

rely

lim

itin

g th

e co

mm

issi

on

earn

ed o

n th

e sa

le o

f M

edic

are

sup

ple

men

t in

sura

nce

po

lici

es,

po

tent

iall

y re

stri

ctin

g av

aila

bil

ity.

DO

I m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

1/8

/92

Do

nA

8

9 I

AC

24

0

15

IR

173

98

Sus

pen

sio

n

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act

Pro

gram

cut

bac

ks w

itho

ut a

deq

uate

no

tifi

cati

on

and

pro

tect

ion

of

eld

erly

cli

ents

. D

on

A

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

.

5/1

1/9

3 O

SF

M

41

IA

C 1

00

1

6 I

R 1

568

1

Pro

hib

itio

n C

on

flic

tin

g R

egul

atio

ns/S

tatu

tory

A

utho

rity

Co

nfl

ict

bet

wee

n O

SF

M a

nd D

CF

S o

n st

and

ard

s. O

SF

M m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

OS

FM

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

9/1

4/9

3 D

OC

1

7 I

AC

59

0,

17

IR

455

4

Pro

hib

itio

n L

egis

lati

ve I

nten

t L

imit

s n

um

ber

of

per

son

s w

ho c

an h

unt

gees

e fr

om

a s

ingl

e b

lind

or

hut

to 3

, w

itho

ut

suff

icie

nt j

usti

fica

tio

n. D

OC

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

.

10

/12

/93

DP

A

89

IA

C 1

44

, 1

40

17

IR

151

62

2 S

usp

ensi

on

s S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent

Red

ucti

on

in p

aym

ents

to

fac

ilit

ies

cari

ng

for

DD

cli

ents

, in

co

ntra

dic

tio

n o

f P

A 8

8-8

8.

DP

A

rep

eale

d.

56

11

/16

/93

DF

I 3

8 I

AC

13

0

17

IR

692

9

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent

Un

fair

rat

e st

ruct

ure

for

cash

ing

pub

lic

aid

che

cks.

DF

I w

ithd

rew

.

12

/14

/93

ICC

8

3 I

AC

31

5

93

IR

202

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t/

Ove

rbur

den

som

e R

egul

atio

n

Un

fair

rat

es p

aid

by

cab

le T

V c

om

pan

ies

to u

tili

ties

fo

r u

se o

f p

ole

sp

ace.

IC

C w

ithd

rew

.

9/1

3/9

4 D

PH

7

7 I

AC

79

0

18

IR

320

5, 3

202

2 P

rohi

bit

ions

(N

ew R

ule

&

Rep

eal)

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

/ L

egis

lati

ve I

nten

t In

clu

sio

n o

f d

rug

pro

duc

ts i

n th

e Il

l. D

rug

Fo

rmul

ary

that

wer

e no

t d

eem

ed e

qui

vale

nt b

y F

DA

or

wer

e ex

emp

t fr

om

FD

A c

on

sid

erat

ion.

DP

H w

ithd

rew

.

11

/15

/94

DP

A

89

IA

C 1

40

1

8

IR 1

092

2

Sus

pen

sio

n

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

M

edic

aid

co

vera

ge o

f ab

ort

ions

in

rap

e/in

cest

cas

es c

on

flic

ted

wit

h st

atut

e li

mit

ing

cove

rage

to

end

ange

rmen

t o

f m

oth

er's

lif

e. D

PA

rep

eale

d e

mer

genc

y ru

le.

2/7

/95

SB

E

23

IA

C 4

01

1

8 I

R 9

756

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Reg

ulat

ion

of

nonp

ubli

c sp

ecia

l ed

ucat

ion

faci

liti

es w

itho

ut s

tatu

tory

aut

hori

ty.

SB

E

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

.

4/1

8/9

5 D

AS

A

77

IA

C 2

09

0

19

IR

115

6

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent/

D

ue P

roce

ss

Alc

oho

lism

/sub

stan

ce a

bu

se c

ente

rs a

pp

lyin

g fo

r ce

rtif

icat

ion

as M

edic

aid

pro

vid

ers

wit

h d

efic

ienc

ies

in t

reat

men

t p

rogr

ams

wil

l ha

ve a

pp

lica

tio

ns d

enie

d w

ith

no c

hanc

e fo

r re

med

iati

on

and

no

cha

nce

to a

pp

eal

the

den

ial.

DA

SA

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

1

0/1

5/9

6 IC

C

83

IA

C 7

61

, 7

62,

76

3, 7

64

2

0 I

R 8

416

, 8

40

7, 8

393

, 8

39

5, 8

527

, 85

41

2 (

761

, 76

3)

Sus

pen

sio

ns

4 P

rohi

bit

ions

(8

3 I

AC

76

1,

76

2, 7

63

, 764

)

Ove

rbur

den

som

e R

egul

atio

n

Co

mp

lex

dis

cove

ry p

roce

dur

es h

ind

er I

CC

’s a

bil

ity

to m

ake

an a

rbit

rati

on

dec

isio

n in

volv

ing

loca

l te

lep

hone

car

rier

s an

d l

ong

dis

tanc

e ca

rrie

rs i

niti

atin

g lo

cal

serv

ice

wit

hin

fed

eral

ti

mef

ram

es.

ICC

ref

use

d t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

pro

hib

itio

ns/

susp

ensi

on

s w

ithd

raw

n.

3/1

8/9

7 D

NR

1

7 I

AC

85

0

21

IR

322

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t E

lim

inat

ed c

om

mer

cial

per

ch f

ishi

ng

on

Lak

e M

ichi

gan

wil

l ha

ve a

n u

ndue

eco

nom

ic i

mp

act

on

the

reg

ulat

ed b

usin

ess.

DN

R w

ill

do

fur

ther

rul

emak

ing;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

11

/12

/97

DP

H

77

IA

C 2

90

2

1 I

R 1

390

8

Sus

pen

sio

n

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent/

A

dve

rse

Imp

act

on

Ava

ilab

ilit

y o

f A

deq

uate

Hea

lth

Car

e F

acil

itie

s

Hea

lth

faci

lity

pla

n re

view

is

stat

uto

rily

req

uir

ed o

nly

for

cons

truc

tio

n p

roje

cts

cost

ing

ove

r $

5,0

00,

not

all

pro

ject

s. D

PH

wit

hdre

w.

2/1

7/9

9 S

BE

L

26

IA

C 2

01

, 2

02

22

IR

785

8, 7

862

2 P

rohi

bit

ions

S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent

Cre

ates

a s

yste

m f

or

SB

EL

sta

ff r

evie

w o

f no

min

atin

g p

etit

ions

fo

r ap

par

ent

conf

orm

ity

that

is

no

t co

nsi

sten

t w

ith

stat

uto

ry p

etit

ion

revi

ew p

roce

dur

es.

SB

EL

wit

hdre

w.

4/1

1/0

0 IC

C

83

IA

C 7

26

2

4 I

R 1

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act/

U

ndue

Reg

. B

urd

en

Ext

end

s ap

pli

cati

on

of

En

hanc

ed 9

-1-1

req

uire

men

ts t

o s

cho

ols

, go

vern

men

ts a

nd n

ot-

for-

pro

fits

in

add

itio

n to

the

sta

tuto

rily

int

end

ed p

riva

te b

usin

esse

s, c

orp

ora

tio

ns a

nd i

ndus

trie

s.

ICC

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

57

6/1

3/0

0 IC

C

83

IA

C 7

27

2

4 I

R 8

635

E

Sus

pen

sio

n

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

/ E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t E

xten

ds

app

lica

tio

n o

f E

nha

nced

9-1

-1 r

equi

rem

ents

to

sch

oo

ls,

gove

rnm

ents

and

no

t-fo

r-p

rofi

ts i

n ad

dit

ion

to t

he s

tatu

tori

ly i

nten

ded

pri

vate

bus

ines

ses,

co

rpo

rati

ons

and

ind

ustr

ies.

IC

C r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hd

raw

; su

spen

sio

n ex

pir

ed.

11

/29

/00

DF

I 3

8 I

AC

11

0

24

IR

117

17

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t T

his

atte

mp

t to

reg

ulat

e sh

ort

-ter

m (

pay

day

) lo

ans

and

cas

h fo

r ti

tle

loan

s cr

eate

s an

un

reas

ona

ble

eco

nom

ic b

urd

en f

or

smal

l le

nder

s, w

hich

co

uld

res

ult

in d

imin

ishe

d

avai

lab

ilit

y o

f lo

ans

for

cons

um

ers

wit

h li

mit

ed o

pti

ons

. D

FI

refu

sed

to

mo

dif

y o

r w

ithd

raw

; p

rohi

bit

ion

exp

ired

. 1

/9/0

1 IC

C

83

IA

C 7

27

2

4 I

R 8

454

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Ext

end

s ap

pli

cati

on

of

En

hanc

ed 9

-1-1

req

uire

men

ts t

o s

cho

ols

, go

vern

men

ts a

nd n

ot-

for-

pro

fits

in

add

itio

n to

the

sta

tuto

rily

int

end

ed p

riva

te b

usin

esse

s, c

orp

ora

tio

ns a

nd i

ndus

trie

s.

ICC

ref

used

to

mo

dif

y o

r w

ith

dra

w;

pro

hib

itio

n ex

pir

ed.

1/9

/01

SB

E

23

IA

C 2

8

24

IR

167

38

Sus

pen

sio

n

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act

Und

er t

hese

per

emp

tory

rul

es,

teac

hers

wil

l no

t b

e as

qua

lifi

ed t

o t

each

chi

ldre

n w

ith

spec

ial

need

s as

cur

rent

rul

e p

rovi

des

. A

lso

, te

ache

rs w

ill

nee

d a

dd

itio

nal

trai

nin

g, w

hich

co

uld

res

ult

in f

ewer

qua

lifi

ed t

each

ers

avai

lab

le t

o s

erve

sp

ecia

l ed

ucat

ion

stud

ents

. S

BE

im

ple

men

ted

the

set

tlem

ent

ord

er a

s ag

ency

po

licy

out

sid

e ru

le.

PA

97

-46

1 a

utho

rize

d S

BE

to

use

per

emp

tory

rul

emak

ing

to i

mp

lem

ent

the

fed

eral

co

urt

ord

ers

SB

E a

do

pte

d r

ules

8

/22

/11.

SB

E r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

susp

ensi

on

mad

e p

erm

anen

t b

y S

JR 2

6.

2/2

1/0

1 S

BE

2

3 I

AC

25

2

4 I

R 1

610

9

Sus

pen

sio

n

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act

Co

ntin

ued

enf

orc

emen

t w

oul

d c

ons

titu

te a

ser

iou

s th

reat

to

the

wel

fare

of

spec

ial

educ

atio

n st

uden

ts.

Im

ple

men

tati

on

may

res

ult

in

unq

uali

fied

tea

cher

s b

eing

ass

igne

d t

o s

tud

ents

fo

r w

ho

m t

he t

each

er h

as n

o t

rain

ing

or

pre

par

atio

n. (

See

ab

ove

des

crip

tio

n.)

SB

E r

efus

ed t

o

mo

dif

y o

r w

ithd

raw

; su

spen

sio

n m

ade

per

man

ent

by

SJR

26

. 1

1/1

9/0

2 D

PA

8

9 I

AC

12

0

26

IR

504

7

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

und

er F

eder

al L

aw

Exc

eed

s fe

der

al s

tatu

tory

aut

ho

rity

by

add

ing

rest

rict

ions

on

det

erm

inin

g w

heth

er a

n an

nui

ty

was

tra

nsfe

rred

at

fair

mar

ket

valu

e. D

PA

fai

led

to

res

po

nd t

o o

bjec

tio

n w

ithi

n st

atut

ory

tim

e li

mit

; ru

lem

akin

g d

eem

ed w

ithd

raw

n.

11

/18

/03

OB

RE

3

8 I

AC

37

5,

10

00

, 107

5

27

IR

160

24

, 1

60

29,

160

43

3 S

usp

ensi

on

s N

o L

egit

imat

e E

mer

genc

y In

crea

ses

fees

ass

esse

d o

n fi

nanc

ial

inst

itut

ions

wit

hout

pro

ving

the

exi

sten

ce o

f a

situ

atio

n

mer

itin

g th

e us

e o

f em

erge

ncy

rul

emak

ing.

OB

RE

rep

eale

d e

mer

genc

y ru

les.

2/1

8/0

4 D

PR

6

8 I

AC

13

70

2

8 I

R 1

760

Sus

pen

sio

n

Lac

k o

f st

and

ard

s L

acks

su

ffic

ien

t st

and

ard

s to

be

app

lied

in

det

erm

inin

g w

het

her

a p

urp

ort

ed k

ickb

oxi

ng

even

t is

act

uall

y an

ult

imat

e fi

ght

ing

eve

nt.

(A

mat

eur

and

pro

fess

iona

l ki

ckb

oxi

ng e

ven

ts a

re

exem

pt

fro

m D

PR

's a

utho

rity

to

ban

ult

imat

e fi

ght

ing.

) D

PR

rep

eale

d e

mer

genc

y ru

le.

2/1

8/0

4 IC

C

92

IA

C 1

71

0

27

IR

860

0

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t In

crea

sin

g th

e am

oun

t a

com

mer

cial

rel

oca

tor

of

tres

pas

sin

g ve

hicl

es i

s ch

arge

d f

or

fili

ng

re

loca

tio

n to

w r

eco

rd f

orm

s an

d n

um

ber

s, r

egar

dle

ss o

f w

het

her

the

relo

cato

r is

rei

mb

urse

d

for

the

tow

, m

ay c

reat

e an

und

ue e

cono

mic

bur

den

on

thes

e b

usin

esse

s, w

hic

h m

ay r

esul

t in

a

dec

reas

e in

rel

oca

tor

avai

lab

ilit

y. I

CC

ref

use

d t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

pro

hib

itio

n ex

pir

ed.

7/1

3/0

4 B

HE

2

3 I

AC

10

20

2

8 I

R 2

84

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Po

licy

Out

sid

e R

ule

Sta

tute

sp

ecif

ies

pro

gram

s el

igib

le f

or

Hea

lth

Ser

vice

Ed

ucat

ion

Gra

nts

and

do

es n

ot

give

B

HE

aut

hori

ty t

o f

urth

er l

imit

tha

t el

igib

ilit

y. B

HE

wit

hdre

w.

58

1/1

1/0

5 D

PH

7

7 I

AC

86

0,

870

, 8

80

, 88

5

28

IR

165

2,

16

74

, 261

3,

16

84

, 171

7

4 P

rohi

bit

ions

Thr

eat

to t

he P

ubli

c In

tere

st

DP

H f

aile

d t

o g

ive

all

affe

cted

par

ties

the

op

po

rtun

ity

to d

iscu

ss t

he p

rop

ose

d m

anuf

actu

red

ho

usin

g ru

lem

akin

gs

and

po

tent

ial

amen

dm

ents

, cr

eati

ng a

thr

eat

to t

he p

ubli

c in

tere

st.

DP

H

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

s w

ithd

raw

n;

DP

H f

aile

d t

o a

do

pt

bef

ore

1 y

ear

exp

irat

ion.

6/1

4/0

5 E

SR

B

41

IA

C 2

20

2

9 I

R 1

101

Pro

hib

itio

n

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

C

reat

es e

leva

tor

safe

ty r

ules

- N

um

ero

us p

rovi

sio

ns c

on

flic

ted

wit

h st

atut

e o

r la

cked

st

atu

tory

aut

hori

ty.

ES

RB

wit

hdre

w.

4/1

1/0

6 S

BE

2

3 I

AC

30

5

30

IR

86

Pro

hib

itio

n

Thr

eat

to t

he P

ubli

c In

tere

st

Set

s sc

hoo

l n

utri

tio

n st

and

ard

s th

at d

o n

ot

pro

vid

e a

tota

l ap

pro

ach

to c

hild

nu

trit

ion

thro

ug

h d

iet,

nut

riti

on

educ

atio

n an

d e

xerc

ise;

pre

emp

ts t

he p

urvi

ew o

f th

e S

tate

Tas

k F

orc

e o

n W

elln

ess

that

is

to c

ons

ider

th

e is

sue

of

scho

ol

nutr

itio

n an

d r

epo

rt t

o th

e G

ove

rno

r an

d t

he

Gen

eral

Ass

emb

ly b

y Ja

nua

ry 2

00

7;

and

lar

gely

exc

lud

es l

oca

l sc

hoo

l d

istr

ict

inp

ut a

nd

exp

erti

se i

n d

evel

op

men

t o

f th

e p

ropo

sal.

SB

E m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

7/1

1/0

6 D

CF

S

89

IA

C 4

06

, 4

08

29

IR

181

80

, 1

82

07

2 P

rohi

bit

ions

Eco

nom

ic I

mp

act

The

rul

emak

ings

lac

k cl

arit

y, w

hic

h th

reat

ens

the

pub

lic

inte

rest

in

that

ap

pli

cant

s/li

cens

ees

and

the

fam

ilie

s th

ey s

erve

co

uld

be

adve

rsel

y ec

ono

mic

ally

im

pac

ted

. D

CF

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

7/1

1/0

6 D

FP

R

38

IA

C 1

10

3

0 I

R 2

449

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

No

sta

tuto

ry a

utho

rity

to

ap

ply

Pay

day

Lo

an R

efo

rm A

ct r

estr

icti

on

s to

Co

nsu

mer

In

stal

lmen

t L

oan

Act

lic

ense

es.

DF

PR

ref

used

to

mo

dif

y o

r w

ithd

raw

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

o

n p

rovi

sio

ns a

ffec

ting

mil

itar

y; r

emai

nder

is

per

man

entl

y p

rohi

bit

ed.

11

/14

/06

DO

L

56

IA

C 2

20

2

9 I

R 1

910

6

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

The

pro

visi

ons

reg

ard

ing

wh

en e

mp

loye

e b

reak

s m

ay b

e ta

ken

are

no

t st

atut

ori

ly r

equi

red

and

ap

pea

r to

be

und

uly

rest

rict

ive

wit

hout

sig

nifi

cant

ben

efit

. D

OL

wit

hdre

w.

1/9

/07

SB

E

23

IA

C 2

26

3

0 I

R 4

421

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

In

corp

ora

tes

Sp

ecia

l E

duc

atio

n fe

der

al r

ules

– A

do

pti

on

of

po

lici

es i

s no

t m

and

ated

by

the

US

Do

E a

nd p

ose

s a

seri

ou

s th

reat

to

the

int

eres

ts o

f ch

ild

ren

wit

h d

isab

ilit

ies

and

sp

ecia

l ed

ucat

ion

teac

hers

. S

BE

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

2

/6/0

7 D

OA

8

IA

C 2

5

30

IR

146

64

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Reg

ulat

ion

and

lic

ensi

ng

of

do

g d

ayca

re –

DO

A i

nad

equa

tely

jus

tifi

ed t

he n

eed

fo

r th

is n

ew

regu

lato

ry

acti

vit

y,

wh

ich

was

no

t sp

ecif

ical

ly

auth

ori

zed

b

y st

atut

e.

DO

A

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

3

/13

/07

ES

RB

4

1 I

AC

10

00

3

0 I

R 1

652

2

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

C

reat

es e

leva

tor

safe

ty r

ules

– A

do

pti

on

of

1st N

oti

ce m

od

ific

atio

n re

qui

rin

g m

echa

nics

to

wo

rk u

nder

the

dir

ect

sup

ervi

sio

n o

f a

lice

nsed

co

ntr

acto

r w

itho

ut a

n o

pp

ort

unit

y fo

r p

ubli

c to

co

mm

ent

is a

ser

iou

s th

reat

to

the

pub

lic

inte

rest

. E

SR

B m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

6/1

9/0

7 C

MS

4

4 I

AC

1

30

IR

195

77

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

All

ow

s p

igg

ybac

kin

g an

d m

ulti

-go

vern

men

t p

rocu

rem

ent.

CM

S l

acks

sta

tuto

ry a

utho

rity

to

per

mit

nu

mer

ou

s p

urch

asin

g p

roce

dur

es a

nd r

equi

rem

ents

of

the

Pro

cure

men

t C

od

e to

be

byp

asse

d.

CM

S w

ithd

rew

. 9

/18

/07

DF

PR

5

0 I

AC

93

7

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Em

erge

ncy

S

ets

sup

ple

men

tal q

uart

erly

rep

ort

ing

req

uire

men

ts f

or

heal

th in

sura

nce

firm

s. N

o e

mer

gen

cy

situ

atio

n w

arra

nted

ad

op

tio

n o

f an

em

erge

ncy

rule

. U

se o

f em

erge

ncy

rule

mak

ing

imp

ose

s

59

31

IR

106

99

E

new

co

sts

wit

hout

the

op

po

rtun

ity

for

pri

or

revi

ew a

nd c

om

men

t by

the

affe

cted

pub

lic.

DF

PR

re

pea

led

em

erge

ncy

rule

.

10

/10

/07

DF

PR

5

0 I

AC

93

7

31

IR

105

46

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Set

s su

pp

lem

enta

l q

uart

erly

rep

ort

ing

req

uire

men

ts f

or

heal

th i

nsu

ranc

e fi

rms.

N

o s

tatu

tory

au

tho

rity

. D

FP

R r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

pro

hib

itio

n p

erm

anen

t.

11

/13

/07

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

20

3

1 I

R 1

585

4E

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Em

erge

ncy

E

xpan

ds

Fam

ilyC

are

to r

elat

ives

of

chil

dre

n re

ceiv

ing

med

ical

ass

ista

nce

wit

h in

com

es o

f up

to

40

0%

FP

L;

pic

ks

up c

ove

rage

fo

r p

erso

ns f

orm

erly

rec

eiv

ing

med

ical

car

e un

der

a f

eder

al

Sta

te

Chi

ldre

n's

H

ealt

h In

sura

nce

Pro

gram

w

aive

r th

at

exp

ired

9

/30

/07

. H

FS

re

pea

led

em

erge

ncy

rule

. 1

/11

/08

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

40

3

1 I

R 1

357

0

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t A

utho

rize

s m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e p

aym

ent

for

rout

ine

exam

inat

ions

and

pre

vent

ive

serv

ices

fo

r p

erso

ns o

ver

18

(cu

rren

tly

chil

dre

n o

nly)

. H

FS

ref

used

to

mo

dif

y o

r w

ithd

raw

; p

rohi

bit

ion

per

man

ent.

1

/11

/08

DP

H

77

IA

C 9

75

3

1 I

R 1

367

2

Pro

hib

itio

n D

ue P

roce

ss

Imp

lem

ents

Sm

oke

Fre

e Il

lino

is A

ct.

DP

H r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

pro

hib

itio

n p

erm

anen

t.

2/1

3/0

8 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

14

7

32

IR

415

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Em

erge

ncy

R

eto

ols

th

e M

inim

um

D

ata

Sys

tem

o

f d

eter

min

ing

reim

bur

sem

ent

rate

s fo

r m

edic

al

assi

stan

ce.

HF

S r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

susp

ensi

on

wit

hdra

wn.

2/2

6/0

8 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

12

0

31

IR

154

24

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t E

xpan

ds

Fam

ilyC

are

to r

elat

ives

of

chil

dre

n re

ceiv

ing

med

ical

ass

ista

nce

wit

h in

com

es o

f up

to

40

0%

FP

L; p

icks

up

co

vera

ge f

or

per

sons

who

hav

e b

een

rece

ivin

g fu

nds

und

er th

e fe

der

al

wai

ver

that

exp

ired

9/3

0/0

7. H

FS

ref

used

to

mo

dif

y o

r w

ithd

raw

; p

rohi

bit

ion

per

man

ent.

5

/20

/08

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

20

3

2 I

R 7

212

Sus

pen

sio

n

Imp

rop

er U

se o

f P

erem

pto

ry

Rul

emak

ing

Req

uire

s m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e re

cip

ient

s to

mee

t T

AN

F w

ork

req

uire

men

ts (

Fam

ilyC

are)

. IA

PA

all

ow

s us

e o

f p

erem

pto

ry r

ulem

akin

g to

im

ple

men

t a

cour

t o

rder

. T

here

was

no

co

urt

ord

er.

HF

S r

efus

ed t

o m

od

ify

or

wit

hdra

w;

susp

ensi

on

per

man

ent.

5

/20

/08

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

40

3

2 I

R 6

743

Sus

pen

sio

n

Imp

rop

er U

se o

f P

erem

pto

ry

Rul

emak

ing

Req

uire

s u

se o

f ta

mp

er-r

esis

tant

pre

scri

pti

on

pad

s in

ord

er f

or

a p

resc

rip

tio

n to

be

elig

ible

fo

r M

edic

aid

rei

mb

urse

men

t. T

he

IAP

A d

ead

line

fo

r im

ple

men

ting

a f

eder

al r

equi

rem

ent

by

per

emp

tory

ru

lem

akin

g w

as

exce

eded

. H

FS

fa

iled

to

re

spo

nd

to

obj

ecti

on;

su

spen

sio

n

per

man

ent.

6

/17

/08

SB

E

23

IA

C 4

01

3

2 I

R 4

843

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Em

erge

ncy

N

onp

ubli

c an

d o

ut-o

f-st

ate

pro

vid

ers

of

spec

ial

ed s

ervi

ces

to s

tud

ents

wit

h d

isab

ilit

ies

mu

st

mai

ntai

n a

wri

tten

po

licy

tha

t us

e o

f b

ehav

iora

l in

terv

enti

on

stra

tegi

es r

elyi

ng o

n p

ain

wil

l no

t b

e ap

pli

ed t

o a

ny s

tud

ent.

SB

E r

epea

led

em

erge

ncy

rule

. 9

/16

/08

SB

E

23

IA

C 4

01

3

2 I

R 4

705

Pro

hib

itio

n C

ont

rave

nes

Sta

tute

N

onp

ubli

c an

d o

ut-o

f-st

ate

pro

vid

ers

of

spec

ial

ed s

ervi

ces

to s

tud

ents

wit

h d

isab

ilit

ies

mu

st

mai

ntai

n a

wri

tten

po

licy

tha

t us

e o

f b

ehav

iora

l in

terv

enti

on

stra

tegi

es r

elyi

ng o

n p

ain

wil

l no

t b

e ap

pli

ed t

o a

ny s

tud

ent.

SB

E f

aile

d t

o r

esp

ond

to

obj

ecti

on;

dee

med

wit

hdra

wn.

1

1/1

9/0

8 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

12

0

32

IR

188

89

Sus

pen

sio

n

Imp

rop

er U

se o

f P

erem

pto

ry

Rul

emak

ing

Req

uire

s m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e re

cip

ient

s to

mee

t T

AN

F w

ork

req

uire

men

ts (

Fam

ilyC

are)

. IA

PA

all

ow

s us

e o

f p

erem

pto

ry r

ulem

akin

g to

im

ple

men

t a

cour

t o

rder

. T

here

was

no

co

urt

ord

er.

HF

S r

epea

led

per

emp

tory

rul

e.

60

11

/19

/08

DH

S

89

IA

C 1

21

3

2 I

R 1

690

5

Sus

pen

sio

n

Imp

rop

er U

se o

f P

erem

pto

ry

Rul

emak

ing

Imp

lem

ents

pro

visi

ons

at

the

fed

eral

Fo

od,

Co

nser

vati

on

and

Ene

rgy

Act

of

20

08

tha

t m

ade

FS

co

upo

ns o

bso

lete

aft

er 6

/18

/08

. D

HS

rep

eale

d p

erem

pto

ry r

ule.

3/1

7/0

9 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

14

0

32

IR

140

03

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

HF

S m

ay d

eny

par

tici

pat

ion

in t

he m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e p

rogr

am t

o p

rovi

der

s th

at o

we

a d

ebt

to H

FS

or

if H

FS

rec

eive

s cr

edib

le e

vid

ence

of

frau

d o

r w

illf

ul m

isre

pre

sent

atio

n un

der

the

m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e p

rogr

am.

HF

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ith

dra

wn.

6

/16

/09

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

40

3

2 I

R 1

376

1

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

D

escr

ibes

gro

up p

sych

oth

erap

y se

ssio

ns e

ligi

ble

fo

r m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e re

imb

urse

men

t. H

FS

m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

6/1

6/0

9 D

HS

8

9 I

AC

68

6

33

IR

701

7

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Em

erge

ncy

Im

ple

men

ts e

nhan

ced

rat

es t

o a

ssis

t q

uali

fyin

g ho

mem

aker

age

ncie

s p

rovi

din

g he

alth

care

co

vera

ge t

o t

heir

dir

ect

serv

ice

emp

loye

es.

DH

S r

epea

led

em

erge

ncy

rule

.

7/1

4/0

9 D

NR

1

7 I

AC

37

03

3

2 I

R 1

444

5

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t D

esig

nate

s ex

clus

ion

zone

s fo

r ru

n-o

f-ri

ver

dam

s an

d s

ets

spec

ific

atio

ns f

or

sig

ns a

nd d

evic

es

war

nin

g p

erso

ns u

sin

g p

ubli

c w

ater

s o

f th

e p

rese

nce

of

dam

s. D

NR

ref

used

to

mo

dif

y or

w

ithd

raw

; p

rohi

bit

ion

per

man

ent.

9

/15

/09

DH

S

89

IA

C 1

12

, 1

14

33

IR

520

1,

52

28

2 P

rohi

bit

ions

S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Rem

ove

s as

sets

fro

m c

ons

ider

atio

n w

hen

det

erm

inin

g an

ind

ivid

ual's

eli

gib

ilit

y fo

r T

AN

F

and

Gen

eral

Ass

ista

nce.

DH

S w

ithd

rew

.

9/1

5/0

9 D

HS

5

9 I

AC

27

0

33

IR

705

4

Pro

hib

itio

n C

ont

rave

nes

IAP

A

Aut

ism

Res

earc

h F

und

gra

nts.

T

he r

ulem

akin

g d

id n

ot

incl

ude

suff

icie

nt

gran

tmak

ing

pro

ced

ures

and

sta

ndar

ds.

DH

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

8/1

0/1

0 IE

MA

3

2 I

AC

33

0

33

IR

120

61

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t E

xem

pts

sp

ecif

ied

wat

er a

nd s

ewag

e tr

eatm

ent

resi

dua

ls o

r sl

udge

s co

nta

inin

g na

tura

lly

occ

urri

ng r

adiu

m f

rom

sta

tuto

ry r

egis

trat

ion,

lic

ensu

re,

fee

and

rep

ort

ing

req

uire

men

ts a

nd

inst

ead

req

uire

s re

gist

rati

on

wit

h IE

MA

. IE

MA

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

1

0/1

9/1

0 D

FP

R

68

IA

C 1

24

9

34

IR

504

7

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t Im

ple

men

ts t

he C

emet

ery

Ove

rsig

ht A

ct.

DF

PR

wit

hdre

w.

4/1

2/1

1 S

BE

2

3 I

AC

30

3

4 I

R 5

047

2 P

rohi

bit

ions

S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Est

abli

shes

the

Pri

ncip

al P

repa

rati

on

Pro

gram

. S

BE

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

5/1

0/1

1 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

12

0

34

IR

116

64

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty/

Leg

isla

tive

Int

ent

Imp

lem

ents

fed

eral

req

uire

men

ts f

or

Med

icai

d e

ligi

bil

ity

for

long

ter

m c

are

assi

stan

ce.

HF

S

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

.

5/1

0/1

1 D

FP

R

50

IA

C 8

10

0

34

IA

C 1

59

26

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

Cla

rifi

es w

hat

acti

viti

es w

ill

no

t b

e co

nsid

ered

ind

ucem

ent

for

the

refe

rral

of

titl

e in

sura

nce

bus

ines

s. D

FP

R m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

61

7/1

2/1

1 T

reas

urer

7

4 I

AC

74

0

35

IR

889

3

Sus

pen

sio

n

No

Leg

itim

ate

Em

erge

ncy

Rev

ises

ad

min

istr

ativ

e fe

e fo

r p

arti

cip

ants

in

th

e P

ubli

c T

reas

urer

s In

vest

men

t P

oo

l.

Sus

pen

sio

n w

ithd

raw

n ef

fect

ive

wit

h ad

op

tio

n o

f m

od

ifie

d p

erm

anen

t ru

le.

1/1

0/1

2 S

OS

9

2 I

AC

10

01

35

IR

149

16

Pro

hib

itio

n S

tatu

tory

Aut

hori

ty

BA

IID

exe

mp

tio

n d

oes

no

t ap

ply

to

a h

old

er o

f a

mo

nito

rin

g d

evic

e d

riv

ing

per

mit

usi

ng

an

emp

loye

r's

vehi

cle

for

per

sona

l us

e.

SO

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

3/6

/12

DP

H

77

IA

C 3

00

3

5 I

R 9

927

Pro

hib

itio

n L

ack

of

Cla

rity

D

efin

es p

erso

nnel

del

iver

ing

"d

irec

t ca

re"

for

long

ter

m c

are

faci

liti

es.

DP

H m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

6/1

2/1

2 IC

C

83

IA

C 4

12

P

rohi

bit

ion

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

S

ets

req

uire

men

ts f

or

reta

il e

lect

ric

sup

pli

ers'

co

nsu

mer

ed

uca

tio

n an

d p

rote

ctio

n p

rogr

ams

pro

vid

ing

for

elec

tric

cus

tom

er c

hoic

e fo

r re

sid

enti

al o

r sm

all

reta

il c

om

mer

cial

cu

sto

mer

s.

ICC

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

8

/14

/12

HF

S

89

IA

C

14

0.4

42

(e)(

4)

36

IR

113

29

Sus

pen

sio

n

Inap

pro

pri

ate

Use

of

Em

erge

ncy

Rul

emak

ing

In a

SM

AR

T A

ct e

mer

genc

y ru

le,

add

ed a

ntib

ioti

cs t

o m

edic

atio

n ty

pes

tha

t d

o n

ot

req

uire

p

rio

r ap

pro

val

whe

n a

med

ical

as

sist

ance

re

cip

ient

ex

ceed

s st

atut

ory

li

mit

o

f 4

pre

scri

pti

ons

/mo

. S

MA

RT

A

ct

did

no

t ad

dres

s an

tib

ioti

cs.

HF

S

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

w

ithd

raw

n.

8/1

4/1

2 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

14

0.4

91

36

IR

113

29

Sus

pen

sio

n

Una

utho

rize

d U

se o

f E

mer

genc

y R

ulem

akin

g

Rem

ove

d e

xem

pti

on

fro

m p

rio

r ap

pro

val

for

tran

spo

rtat

ion

of

med

ical

ass

ista

nce

pat

ient

s fr

om

one

ho

spit

al to

ano

ther

to o

bta

in s

ervi

ces

not a

vail

able

at t

he d

isch

argi

ng h

osp

ital

. Whi

le

the

extr

aord

inar

y S

MA

RT

Act

em

erge

ncy

rule

mak

ing

auth

ori

ty w

as u

sed

, th

is c

han

ge w

as

not

req

uire

d b

y th

e S

MA

RT

Act

. H

FS

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

8

/14

/12

HF

S

89

IA

C

14

8.7

0(g

) 3

6 I

R 1

032

6

Sus

pen

sio

n

Co

ntra

vene

s F

eder

al

Sta

tute

D

enie

s p

aym

ent

for

enti

re

hosp

ital

ad

mis

sio

n fo

r m

edic

al

assi

stan

ce

pat

ient

s w

hen

a

Med

icar

e-d

efin

ed h

osp

ital

acq

uire

d c

ond

itio

n o

ccur

s. H

FS

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn

.

8/1

4/1

2 H

FS

8

9 I

AC

1

48

.14

0(b

)(1

)(F

) 3

6 I

R 1

032

6

Sus

pen

sio

n

Inap

pro

pri

ate

Use

of

Em

erge

ncy

Rul

emak

ing

Eli

min

ates

en

hanc

ed m

edic

al a

ssis

tanc

e p

aym

ent

rate

s fo

r ho

spit

al-b

ased

ph

ysic

al t

hera

py.

T

his

chan

ge w

as n

ot

req

uire

d o

r au

tho

rize

d b

y th

e S

MA

RT

Act

, bu

t H

FS

use

d S

MA

RT

Act

's

emer

genc

y ru

lem

akin

g au

tho

rity

. H

FS

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

8/9

/13

DO

I 5

0 I

AC

54

21

3

6 I

R 1

295

7

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

H

MO

ded

ucti

ble

s/co

pay

men

ts m

ust

be

wai

ved

whe

n th

ey e

xcee

d t

he a

nn

ual

max

imu

m o

ut-

of-

po

cket

exp

ense

s o

f a

hig

h d

educ

tib

le h

ealt

h p

lan

set b

y th

e A

ffo

rdab

le C

are

Act

. Ret

aini

ng

the

50

% c

ap o

n d

educ

tib

les/

cop

aym

ents

do

es n

ot

achi

eve

the

aim

of

per

mit

tin

g so

me

HM

O

cust

om

ers

to o

bta

in h

igh

ded

uct

ible

pla

ns, a

s ex

pre

ssed

by

stat

ute.

DO

I m

od

ifie

d; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

1

0/2

2/1

3 D

NR

1

7 I

AC

30

00

3

7 I

R 2

843

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

/Eco

nom

ic

Imp

act

Est

abli

shes

a c

apit

al g

rant

rev

iew

sys

tem

and

set

s a

non

-ref

und

able

ap

pli

cati

on

fee.

The

fee

s w

oul

d c

reat

e an

un

tena

ble

bur

den

fo

r th

e p

rinc

ipal

ap

pli

cant

s –

lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

and

no

t-fo

r-p

rofi

ts.

DN

R m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

62

11

/19

/13

HF

SR

B

77

IA

C 1

11

0

37

IR

398

2

Pro

hib

itio

n E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t R

equi

res

an A

ST

C t

o s

ubm

it t

o a

noth

er H

RS

RB

rev

iew

to

del

iver

ser

vice

s u

nder

a s

ervi

ce

app

rova

l al

read

y is

sued

by

HR

SR

B b

ut u

nder

w

hich

th

e A

ST

C h

ad n

ot

yet

beg

un

to

imp

lem

ent

serv

ices

. 1

/14

/14

IGB

1

1 I

AC

18

00

3

7 I

R 1

988

2

Sus

pen

sio

n

Sta

tuto

ry A

utho

rity

C

reat

ed t

he V

ideo

Gam

ing

Exc

lusi

on

Lis

t an

d c

lari

fied

tha

t te

rmin

al o

per

ato

rs m

ust

be

lice

nsed

at

the

tim

e th

ey e

nter

int

o u

se a

gree

men

ts.

IGB

rep

eale

d t

he e

mer

genc

y ru

le;

susp

ensi

on

wit

hdra

wn.

1

/14

/14

HF

S

89

IA

C 1

47

3

8 I

R 1

205

Sus

pen

sio

n

Thr

eat

to t

he P

ubli

c In

tere

st/S

afet

y/

Wel

fare

; E

cono

mic

Im

pac

t

Eff

ecti

ve 1

/1/1

4,

imp

lem

ente

d P

As

esta

bli

shin

g en

hanc

ed r

ates

fo

r ve

ntil

ato

r se

rvic

es a

nd

trau

mat

ic b

rain

inj

ury

(TB

I) c

are.

Als

o i

mp

lem

ente

d R

eso

urce

Uti

liza

tio

n G

roup

(R

UG

) m

etho

do

log

y fo

r d

eter

min

ing

nurs

ing

care

LT

C r

eim

bur

sem

ent.

HF

S m

od

ifie

d;

susp

ensi

on

wit

hdra

wn.

6

/17

/14

DH

S

89

IA

C 5

01

3

7 I

R 1

943

7,

19

457

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

U

pd

ates

th

e P

art

to

clar

ify

Par

tner

A

bu

se

Inte

rven

tio

n P

rogr

am

(PA

IP)

req

uire

men

ts,

app

lica

tio

n an

d a

pp

rova

l p

roce

dur

es,

DH

S m

oni

tori

ng

pro

cess

es a

nd e

valu

atio

n p

roce

dur

es.

DH

S m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

10

/14

/14

ICC

8

3 I

AC

47

0

37

IR

205

44

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

O

utli

nes

pro

ced

ures

fo

r lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent

elec

tric

al a

ggr

egat

ion

pro

gram

s o

per

ated

by

reta

il

elec

tric

sup

pli

ers.

IC

C m

od

ifie

d;

pro

hib

itio

n w

ithd

raw

n.

8/1

1/1

5 D

PH

7

7 I

AC

77

5

38

IR

183

46

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

E

xpan

ds

the

Par

t to

inc

lud

e p

roce

dur

es f

or

DP

H i

nsp

ecti

on

and

per

mit

tin

g o

f d

airy

far

ms

that

se

ll o

r d

istr

ibut

e ra

w m

ilk

dir

ectl

y to

co

nsu

mer

s o

n th

eir

dai

ry f

arm

s. D

PH

mo

dif

ied

; p

rohi

bit

ion

wit

hdra

wn.

1

1/1

3/1

8 P

TA

B

86

IA

C 1

91

0

42

IR

386

2

Pro

hib

itio

n T

hrea

t to

the

Pub

lic

Inte

rest

P

rohi

bit

s an

y Il

lino

is l

egis

lato

r fr

om

par

tici

pat

ing

in B

oar

d p

roce

edin

gs b

y re

pre

sent

ing

a ta

xpay

er t

hro

ugh

an

y b

usin

ess

enti

ty,

dir

ectl

y o

r in

dir

ectl

y, i

n an

y ca

pac

ity

oth

er t

han

a

legi

slat

ive

cap

acit

y. P

TA

B w

ithd

rew

the

rul

emak

ing.

1

2/1

1/1

8 D

FP

R

68

IA

C 1

29

0

42

IR

232

02

Sus

pen

sio

n

Thr

eat

to t

he P

ubli

c In

tere

st

Imp

lem

ents

a P

A a

llo

win

g O

pio

id A

lter

nati

ve P

ilo

t Pro

gram

par

tici

pan

ts to

ent

er d

isp

ensa

ries

an

d p

urch

ase

med

ical

can

nab

is w

ith

wri

tten

cer

tifi

cati

on

fro

m a

ph

ysic

ian.

Alt

houg

h th

e P

A

gave

DF

PR

em

erge

ncy

rule

mak

ing

auth

ori

ty,

DF

PR

's e

mer

genc

y ru

le i

nclu

ded

am

end

men

ts

not a

dd

ress

ed in

the

PA

. DF

PR

agr

eed

, and

rem

ove

d th

e o

bje

ctio

nab

le p

arts

of

the

emer

genc

y ru

le.

HIS

TO

RY

OF

GE

NE

RA

L R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978 T

HR

OU

GH

2018

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Tota

l

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e R

ule

s, J

oin

t C

om

mit

tee

on

29

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

9

Agin

g,

Dep

artm

ent

on

83

21

5-

11

23

21

22

11

21

-7

31

20

Agri

cult

ure

, D

epar

tmen

t o

f [1

6]

38

07

13

13

11

13

51

12

32

15

48

18

65

11

15

19

Arc

hit

ect

of

the

Cap

ito

l, O

ffic

e o

f th

e [3

8]

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2

Att

orn

ey G

ener

al3

23

-2

11

31

1-

23

12

21

21

12

61

Att

orn

ey G

ener

al's

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on

0-

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1

Aud

ito

r G

ener

al3

3-

--

--

2-

12

-1

-2

-1

--

11

44

Ban

kin

g B

oar

d o

f Il

lino

is,

Sta

te3

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-3

Cap

ital

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Bo

ard

[2

9]

67

78

13

22

23

-1

41

21

-1

--

41

09

Car

niv

al-A

muse

men

t S

afet

y B

oar

d-D

ept.

of

Lab

or

15

-1

-2

-1

--

-1

--

--

1-

--

-2

1

Cen

tral

Man

agem

ent

Ser

vic

es,

Dep

t. o

f [

2]

29

31

91

82

91

11

12

02

21

01

01

27

12

17

89

43

93

52

7

Chie

f P

rocu

rem

ent

Off

icer

-Cap

ital

Dev

. B

oar

d0

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

--

1-

-3

Chie

f P

rocu

rem

ent

Off

icer

-Gen

eral

Ser

vic

es0

--

--

--

--

--

--

21

1-

1-

-5

Chie

f P

rocu

rem

ent

Off

icer

-Hig

her

Ed

2-

--

--

--

-1

--

-1

--

11

-1

7

Chie

f P

rocu

rem

ent

Off

icer

-Dep

t. o

f T

ransp

ort

atio

n0

--

--

--

--

--

--

-3

-1

--

-4

Chil

dre

n &

Fam

ily S

ervic

es,

Dep

artm

ent

of

31

72

21

32

01

18

88

97

11

15

24

66

72

93

16

85

48

Civ

il S

ervic

e C

om

mis

sio

n5

--

--

--

--

-1

1-

1-

--

--

19

Civ

il S

ervic

e S

yst

em,

Sta

te U

niv

ersi

ties

18

--

--

--

-1

12

11

2-

-1

31

-3

1

Co

mm

erce

& E

con.

Op

po

rt.,

Dep

t. o

f [1

5][

23

][2

5]

23

48

77

11

04

51

4-

25

35

1-

23

83

10

Co

mm

erce

Co

mm

issi

on

44

81

51

62

54

01

02

23

78

61

11

87

16

14

21

37

11

69

9

Co

mm

unit

y C

oll

ege

Bo

ard

47

11

2-

21

--

1-

--

--

-1

16

56

8

Co

mp

tro

ller

49

33

31

--

1-

--

-5

12

--

12

27

3

Co

mp

tro

ller

's M

erit

Co

mm

issi

on

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2

Co

ok C

ounty

Lo

cal

Rec

ord

s C

om

mis

sio

n2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Co

rrec

tio

ns,

Dep

artm

ent

of

32

1-

24

-4

33

1-

13

-3

-2

-1

-1

34

9

Co

urt

of

Cla

ims

11

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

1-

--

4

CP

A B

oar

d o

f E

xam

iner

s2

--

-1

1-

-1

--

12

--

--

11

-1

0

Cri

min

al J

ust

ice

Info

rmat

ion A

uth

ori

ty1

71

4-

-1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

23

Dea

f an

d H

ard

of

Hea

ring C

om

mis

sio

n0

--

1-

--

--

1-

1-

1-

--

--

-4

Deb

t C

oll

ecti

on B

oar

d1

--

2-

--

1-

-1

--

--

--

--

-5

Co

unci

l o

n D

evel

op

men

tal

Dis

abil

itie

s2

--

--

--

01

2-

--

--

--

--

-5

Div

ersi

fyin

g H

i E

d F

acult

y i

n I

L P

rogra

m B

oar

d4

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

63

HIS

TO

RY

OF

GE

NE

RA

L R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978 T

HR

OU

GH

2018

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Tota

l

Dry

clea

ner

Envir

onm

enta

l R

esp

onse

Tru

st F

und

02

--

-1

13

11

-1

-1

-1

--

--

12

Eas

tern

Ill

ino

is U

niv

ersi

ty0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-0

Ed

uca

tio

n,

Sta

te B

oar

d o

f2

11

42

21

48

16

50

23

23

24

23

25

17

21

27

17

38

11

22

76

03

Ed

uca

tio

nal

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns

Bo

ard

16

-1

--

10

--

--

-6

--

4-

--

2-

39

Ele

ctio

ns,

Sta

te B

oar

d o

f7

01

-2

45

75

41

35

21

-2

62

41

12

5

Ele

ctro

nic

Rec

ord

ing C

om

mis

sio

n

0-

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

--

1

Ele

vat

or

Saf

ety R

evie

w B

oar

d0

--

--

-1

11

2-

-1

--

1-

--

-7

Em

ergen

cy M

anag

emen

t A

gen

cy [

3][

24

]1

74

51

08

53

9-

71

28

4-

61

37

81

23

28

5

Em

plo

ym

ent

Sec

uri

ty,

Dep

artm

ent

of

13

24

21

25

4-

21

46

81

5-

-2

--

23

21

1

Envir

onm

enta

l P

rote

ctio

n A

gen

cy2

24

78

33

13

43

57

10

64

33

14

16

12

32

7

Exec

uti

ve

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on [

33

]0

1-

--

-2

-1

--

--

11

--

--

17

Exp

erim

enta

l O

rgan

Tra

nsp

lanta

tio

n P

roce

d.

Bd

.4

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

Fin

anci

al a

nd

Pro

fess

ional

Reg

ula

tio

n [

28

] [3

5]

86

05

52

95

15

93

24

33

33

02

5-

32

25

18

16

12

17

73

81

11

,39

3

Fin

ance

Auth

ori

ty [

30

]6

12

2-

1-

--

--

21

--

-1

--

--

70

Fir

e M

arsh

al7

73

36

32

32

11

87

15

3-

64

15

17

16

7

Gam

ing B

oar

d8

12

22

33

13

65

52

11

75

37

82

86

Go

ver

no

r2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Go

ver

no

r's

Off

ice

of

Man

agem

ent

and

Bud

get

0-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1-

2-

3

Gre

en G

over

nm

ent

Co

ord

inat

ing C

ounci

l [3

4]

0-

--

--

--

-2

--

--

--

--

--

2

Guar

dia

nsh

ip &

Ad

vo

cacy

Co

mm

issi

on

13

6-

1-

--

--

--

--

1-

--

-1

-2

2

Hea

lth F

acil

itie

s an

d S

ervic

es R

evie

w B

oar

d [

36

]6

01

43

4-

-4

16

44

35

13

34

35

11

28

Hea

lth I

nfo

rmat

ion E

xch

ange

Auth

ori

ty0

--

--

--

--

--

--

11

--

--

-2

Hea

lthca

re a

nd

Fam

ily S

ervic

es,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[31

]1

,42

52

33

04

33

23

03

73

21

72

72

32

52

42

23

92

96

14

12

21

1,9

11

Hea

ring I

nst

rum

ent

Co

nsu

mer

Pro

tect

ion B

oar

d2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Hig

her

Ed

uca

tio

n,

Bo

ard

of

53

--

--

12

51

23

15

2-

-2

-5

38

5

His

tori

c P

rese

rvat

ion A

gen

cy7

1-

1-

--

--

--

--

--

2-

2-

-1

3

Ho

usi

ng D

evel

op

men

t A

uth

ori

ty4

51

31

1-

13

11

12

12

31

2-

1-

70

Hum

an R

ights

Co

mm

issi

on [

17

]1

4-

--

--

--

-2

11

--

--

1-

--

19

Hum

an R

ights

, D

epar

tmen

t o

f2

61

12

-2

23

25

22

-3

-2

2-

21

58

Hum

an S

ervic

es,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[1

1]

[1][

18

]7

67

46

39

34

36

32

15

19

25

19

38

32

24

23

15

21

20

11

12

24

1,2

52

Illi

no

is S

tate

Univ

ersi

ty0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-0

Ind

epen

den

t T

ax T

rib

unal

[3

9]

0-

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

1

64

HIS

TO

RY

OF

GE

NE

RA

L R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978 T

HR

OU

GH

2018

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Tota

l

Inno

vat

ion a

nd

Tec

hno

logy,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[41

]0

11

Insu

rance

, D

epar

tmen

t o

f [3

5]

29

11

81

51

41

0x

xx

xx

x1

76

11

13

33

16

10

19

40

51

3

Inves

tmen

t, I

llin

ois

Sta

te B

oar

d o

f8

--

--

--

11

11

12

22

2-

--

22

3

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns

Bo

ard

[2

2]

51

--

42

2-

--

--

-1

-3

-1

1-

-6

5

Lab

or,

Dep

artm

ent

of

78

12

3-

-4

9-

-2

47

31

-6

4-

-2

13

5

Law

Enfo

rcem

ent

Tra

inin

g a

nd

Sta

nd

ard

s B

d.

[20

]1

6-

--

-1

1-

11

-2

21

-1

--

--

26

Leg

isla

tive

Info

rmat

ion S

yst

em7

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-9

Leg

isla

tive

Ref

eren

ce B

ure

au1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Lie

ute

nan

t G

over

no

r4

--

1-

--

--

1-

-1

--

--

--

-7

Liq

uo

r C

ontr

ol

Co

mm

issi

on

11

-2

2-

--

--

1-

--

--

21

-2

12

2

Lo

cal

Rec

ord

s C

om

mis

sio

n2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Lo

tter

y [

26

]1

51

11

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

19

Lo

w-L

evel

Rad

ioac

tive

Was

te T

ask G

roup

0-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

0

Med

ical

Dis

tric

t C

om

mis

sio

n1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Mil

itar

y A

ffai

rs,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[5]

3-

--

11

-1

2-

11

--

-1

--

1-

12

Mo

tor

Veh

icle

Thef

t P

reven

tio

n C

ounci

l4

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[10

] [4

0]

1,1

52

25

52

45

32

47

35

23

29

26

29

33

27

18

39

20

35

24

27

28

1,7

46

Nat

ure

Pre

serv

es C

om

mis

sio

n3

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

-4

No

rthea

ster

n I

llin

ois

Pla

nnin

g C

om

mis

sio

n2

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-3

Ob

sole

te B

oar

ds

& C

om

mis

sio

ns

78

5-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-8

3

Ob

sole

te H

igher

Ed

Bo

ard

s (B

OR

, B

OG

) [1

3]

10

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

0

Po

lluti

on C

ontr

ol

Bo

ard

64

93

01

21

79

20

18

11

19

89

27

20

18

18

20

19

11

12

12

95

9

Illi

no

is P

ow

er A

gen

cy0

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

-5

--

-7

Pri

soner

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

6-

--

--

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

7

Pro

cure

men

t P

oli

cy B

oar

d3

-2

--

--

--

--

-1

--

-3

--

-9

Pro

per

ty T

ax A

pp

eal

Bo

ard

8-

--

--

56

11

1-

--

-1

--

12

26

Pub

lic

Hea

lth,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[21

]9

27

41

30

35

44

18

30

21

21

20

12

46

30

27

24

43

18

30

12

24

1,4

53

Purc

has

ed C

are

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

[2

7]

14

--

-1

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

-1

6

Rac

ing B

oar

d3

16

17

20

16

61

52

21

11

72

01

41

11

51

24

56

31

51

15

56

Rec

ord

s C

om

mis

sio

n,

Sta

te1

--

--

--

11

1-

--

--

--

--

-4

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em,

Gen

eral

Ass

emb

ly0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-0

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em,

Jud

ges

0-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

0

65

HIS

TO

RY

OF

GE

NE

RA

L R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978 T

HR

OU

GH

2018

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Tota

l

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em,

Sta

te E

mp

loyee

s'3

22

11

-2

12

-1

11

--

1-

1-

-2

48

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em,

Sta

te U

niv

ersi

ties

9-

1-

22

84

-1

21

22

32

21

21

45

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em,

Tea

cher

s'2

02

13

12

32

24

25

22

-2

12

12

59

Rev

enue,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[26

]4

11

78

52

41

18

23

11

62

13

31

11

71

14

44

31

41

41

43

08

56

Sav

ings

Inst

ituti

ons,

Bo

ard

of

[12

]3

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-3

Sec

reta

ry o

f S

tate

39

41

41

32

67

17

24

25

23

-2

32

71

92

12

02

51

71

41

41

77

40

Sec

reta

ry o

f S

tate

's M

erit

Co

mm

issi

on

0-

--

--

--

-2

0-

-3

--

--

--

-2

3

Sex

Off

end

er M

anag

emen

t B

oar

d0

--

2-

21

--

2-

--

--

--

2-

-9

So

uth

ern I

llin

ois

Univ

ersi

ty,

Bo

ard

of

Tru

stee

s1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Sp

ecia

lize

d C

are

for

Chil

dre

n,

Div

isio

n o

f 2

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

25

Sp

ort

s F

acil

itie

s A

uth

ori

ty2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Sta

te H

isto

rica

l L

ibra

ry0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-0

Sta

te M

and

ates

Bo

ard

of

Rev

iew

1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Sta

te P

oli

ce M

erit

Bo

ard

[8

]3

31

13

11

-3

1-

2-

2-

--

-1

--

49

Sta

te P

oli

ce,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[1

4]

33

45

36

31

24

-2

32

24

23

66

39

4

Sta

te A

pp

ella

te D

efen

der

0-

--

--

--

--

--

1-

--

--

--

1

Sta

te's

Att

orn

eys

Ap

pel

late

Pro

secu

tor

[4]

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1

Stu

den

t A

ssis

tance

Co

mm

issi

on [

9]

20

51

51

08

15

91

01

88

95

74

10

13

51

02

48

37

5

To

ll H

ighw

ay A

uth

ori

ty,

Illi

no

is S

tate

52

-1

11

3-

--

-1

1-

21

21

1-

22

To

rture

Inq

uir

y R

elie

f C

om

mis

sio

n0

--

--

--

--

--

-2

--

2-

2-

-6

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[10

]3

60

19

16

22

14

22

15

26

44

91

21

41

06

18

11

84

14

66

50

Tra

vel

Co

ntr

ol

Bo

ard

, G

over

no

r's

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1

Tra

vel

Co

ntr

ol

Bo

ard

, H

igher

Ed

uca

tio

n6

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

1-

--

-8

Tra

vel

Co

ntr

ol

Bo

ard

, L

egis

lati

ve

4-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

4

Tra

vel

Reg

ula

tio

n C

ounci

l1

--

-1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Tre

asure

r2

63

22

--

43

--

--

13

21

-2

49

62

Univ

ersi

ty o

f Il

lino

is,

Bo

ard

of

Tru

stee

s1

71

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

18

Vet

eran

s' A

ffai

rs,

Dep

artm

ent

of

27

12

11

--

--

--

21

12

9-

--

--

56

66

HIS

TO

RY

OF

GE

NE

RA

L R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978 T

HR

OU

GH

2018

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Tota

l

Vio

lence

Pre

ven

tio

n A

uth

ori

ty

0-

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

--

1

Wo

rker

s' C

om

pen

sati

on C

om

mis

sio

n [

32

]3

2-

--

--

-1

-1

-2

-5

--

-1

2-

-5

3

(Wo

rker

s' C

om

p)

Co

mm

issi

on R

evie

w B

d [

32

]0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-0

TO

TA

LS

11

,94

75

72

48

35

35

40

93

99

46

13

61

33

54

05

30

74

71

36

13

30

36

83

78

34

02

46

33

73

81

19

,42

6

Th

is t

ab

le i

llu

stra

tes

the

nu

mb

er o

f ru

lem

ak

ing

s co

mm

ence

d b

y e

ach

ag

ency

du

rin

g t

he

cale

nd

ar

yea

r.

[1]

DA

SA

, o

nce

a d

ivis

ion

of

Dan

ger

ou

s D

rugs

Co

mm

issi

on

, b

ecam

e a

sep

arat

e ag

ency

in

19

84

.

[2]

Th

e D

epts

. o

f P

erso

nn

el a

nd

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e S

ervic

es w

ere

com

bin

ed i

n 1

98

2 a

nd

th

e n

ame

was

chan

ged

to

Dep

t. o

f C

entr

al M

anag

emen

t S

ervic

es.

[3]

Incl

ud

es E

mer

gen

cy S

ervic

es &

Dis

aste

r A

gen

cy,

wh

ich

was

ren

amed

IE

MA

in

19

92

. [

4]

Incl

ud

es S

tate

's A

tto

rney

s A

pp

ella

te S

ervic

e

Co

mm

issi

on

. [5

] T

he

Mil

itar

y &

Nav

al D

epar

tmen

t b

ecam

e th

e D

ept.

of

Mil

itar

y A

ffai

rs i

n 1

98

8. [

6]

Th

e D

ept.

of

Reg

istr

atio

n&

Ed

uca

tio

n b

ecam

e D

PR

in

19

88

. [

7]

Co

mm

issi

on

er o

f S

avin

gs

&

Lo

an A

sso

ciat

ion

s b

ecam

e th

e C

om

mis

sio

ner

of

Sav

ings

& R

esid

enti

al F

inan

ce i

n 1

99

0 a

nd

co

mb

ined

wit

h t

he

Co

mm

issi

on

er o

f B

ank

s an

d T

rust

s to

bec

om

e th

e C

om

mis

sio

ner

of

Ban

ks

and

Rea

l

Est

ate

in 1

99

6. T

he

new

off

ice

also

ab

sorb

ed t

he

real

est

ate

lice

nsi

ng f

un

ctio

ns

of

DP

R. [

8]

Un

til

19

86

, th

e D

ept.

of

Law

En

forc

emen

t M

erit

Bo

ard

. [

9]

Th

e S

tate

Sch

ola

rsh

ip C

om

mis

sio

n b

ecam

e

ISA

C i

n 1

98

9. [

10

] In

19

95

, D

OC

, E

NR

(p

revio

usl

y,

Inst

itu

te o

f N

atu

ral

Res

ou

rces

), M

&M

, A

ML

RC

, an

d D

OT

Wat

erw

ays

Div

isio

n w

ere

mer

ged

in

to t

he

Dep

t. o

f N

atu

ral

Res

ou

rces

. [1

1]

July

19

97

, D

HS

was

fo

rmed

fro

m D

AS

A,

DO

RS

, D

MH

DD

, an

d s

pec

ific

pro

gra

ms

fro

m D

PA

an

d D

PH

. [1

2]

In 1

99

6, th

e S

avin

gs

and

Lo

an A

dvis

ory

Bo

ard

bec

ame

the

Bo

ard

of

Sav

ings

Inst

itu

tio

ns.

[1

3]

In 1

99

6, th

e B

oar

d o

f R

egen

ts/G

over

no

rs w

ere

dis

ban

ded

in

fav

or

of

ind

ivid

ual

bo

ard

s o

f tr

ust

ees.

Als

o i

ncl

ud

es o

bso

lete

Tru

stee

s o

f S

tate

CC

of

E.

St.

L.

[14

] P

rio

r to

19

85

, D

ept.

of

Law

En

forc

emen

t. [

15

] P

rio

r to

19

79

, D

ept.

of

Lo

cal

Go

ver

nm

ent

Aff

airs

. [1

6]

Incl

ud

es S

tate

Fai

r A

gen

cy (

pri

or

to 1

97

9).

[1

7]

Ab

sorb

ed F

air

Em

plo

ym

ent

Pra

ctic

es C

om

mis

sio

n i

n 1

98

0. [1

8]

In 1

98

4, th

e

Dan

ger

ou

s D

rugs

Co

mm

issi

on

was

ab

sorb

ed b

y D

AS

A,

wh

ich

was

th

en a

bso

rbed

by D

HS

in

19

97

. [1

9]

IEF

A a

bso

rbed

th

e H

igh

er E

du

cati

on

Lo

an A

uth

ori

ty i

n c

. 1

98

8. [2

0]

In 1

99

3, th

e L

oca

l G

ov.

Law

En

forc

emen

t O

ffic

ers

Tra

inin

g B

oar

d w

as r

enam

ed t

he

Law

En

forc

emen

t T

rain

ing &

Sta

nd

ard

s B

oar

d. [2

1]

HC

CC

ab

sorb

ed H

ealt

hF

inan

ce A

uth

ori

ty (

19

79

-82

) d

uti

es i

n 1

98

4. H

CC

C w

as

abo

lish

ed i

n 2

00

2 a

nd

its

du

ties

tak

en b

y D

PH

. [2

2]

In 2

00

0, th

e L

oca

l L

abo

r R

elat

ion

s an

d S

tate

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns

Bo

ard

s w

ere

com

bin

ed i

nto

th

e Il

lin

ois

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns

Bo

ard

. [2

3]

In

20

03

, D

CC

A

bec

ame

DC

EO

. [2

4]

In 2

00

3, D

NS

was

ab

sorb

ed b

y I

EM

A.

[25

] In

20

03

, P

rair

ie S

tate

20

00

Au

th. w

as t

ran

sfer

red

to

DC

EO

. [2

6]

In 2

00

3, D

ept.

of

the

Lo

tter

y w

as t

ran

sfer

red

to

Rev

enu

e. I

n 2

01

1, P

A

97

-46

4 ch

anged

th

e L

ott

ery b

ack t

o a

n i

nd

epen

den

t ag

ency

. [2

7]

Th

e G

over

no

r's

Pu

rch

ased

Car

e R

evie

w B

oar

d b

ecam

e th

e P

urc

has

ed C

are

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

wh

en i

t m

oved

in

to S

BE

in

19

96

. [2

8]

In

20

04

, th

e D

epts

. o

f In

sura

nce

, P

rofe

ssio

nal

Reg

ula

tio

n a

nd

Fin

anci

al I

nst

itu

tio

ns

and

th

e O

ffic

e o

f B

anks

and

Rea

l E

stat

e w

ere

com

bin

ed i

nto

th

e D

ept.

of

Fin

anci

al a

nd

Pro

fess

ion

al R

egu

lati

on

. [2

9]

Illi

no

is B

uil

din

g C

om

mis

sio

n w

as a

bso

rbed

by t

he

Cap

ital

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Bo

ard

7/1

/04

. [3

0]

Th

e Il

lin

ois

Fin

ance

Au

tho

rity

ab

sorb

ed I

llin

ois

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Fin

ance

Au

tho

rity

, Il

lin

ois

Far

m

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Au

tho

rity

, Il

lin

ois

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

Au

tho

rity

, In

dep

end

ent H

igh

er E

du

cati

on

Lo

an A

uth

ori

ty,

Illi

no

is R

esea

rch

Par

kA

uth

ori

ty,

Illi

no

is R

ura

l B

on

d B

ank,

Illi

no

is E

du

cati

on

al F

acil

itie

s

Au

tho

rity

an

d t

he

Co

mm

un

ity D

evel

op

men

t F

inan

ce C

orp

ora

tio

n 1

/1/0

4. [3

1]

7/1

/05

, th

e n

ame

of

the

Dep

t. o

f P

ub

lic

Aid

was

ch

anged

to t

he

Dep

t. o

f H

ealt

hca

re a

nd

Fam

ily S

ervic

es.

[32

] O

n 1

/1/0

5,

the

nam

e o

f th

e Il

lin

ois

In

du

stri

al C

om

mis

sio

n w

as c

han

ged

to

th

e Il

lin

ois

Wo

rker

s' C

om

pen

sati

on

Co

mm

issi

on

. [3

3]

On

1/1

/99

, P

A 9

0-7

37

rep

eale

d t

he

Go

ver

no

r's

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on

an

d r

epla

ced

it

wit

h t

he

Exec

uti

ve

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on

. [3

4]

PA

95

-65

7 c

reat

ed t

he

Gre

en G

over

nm

ent

Co

ord

inat

ing C

ou

nci

l in

20

07

. [3

5]

On

4/1

/09

DF

PR

's D

ivis

ion

of

Insu

ran

ce w

as r

e-es

tab

lish

ed a

s th

e D

ept.

of

Insu

ran

ce (

par

t o

f D

FP

R f

rom

20

03

-20

09

). [

36

] O

n 6

/30

/09

th

e n

ame

of

the

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

Pla

nn

ing B

oar

d w

as c

han

ged

to

th

e H

ealt

h F

acil

itie

s an

d S

ervic

es R

evie

w B

oar

d. [3

7]

Rep

lace

d

Co

nso

rtiu

m f

or

Ed

uca

tio

nal

Op

po

rtu

nit

y u

nd

er P

A 9

3-8

62

in

20

04

. [3

8]

Fo

rmer

ly,

Leg

isla

tive

Sp

ace

Nee

ds

Co

mm

issi

on

. [3

9]

PA

97

-11

29

cre

ated

th

e Il

lin

ois

In

dep

end

ent T

ax T

rib

un

al i

n 2

01

2. [4

0]

On

7/1

/17

, th

e D

ept.

of

His

tori

c P

rese

rvat

ion

an

d t

he

AL

PL

M w

ere

abso

rbed

in

to D

NR

. [4

1]

On

3/2

5/1

6, E

O 2

01

6-1

co

nso

lid

ated

exec

uti

ve

bra

nch

in

form

atio

n t

ech

no

logy f

un

ctio

ns

into

th

e

67

HIS

TO

RY

OF

EM

ER

GE

NC

Y R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978

TH

RO

UG

H 2

018

68

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

To

tal

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e R

ules

, Jo

int

Co

mm

itte

e o

n1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Agi

ng,

Dep

artm

ent

on

22

--

1-

1-

2-

1-

21

-1

--

--

-3

1A

gric

ultu

re,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[16

]2

23

12

51

-1

-1

-3

11

-2

-1

--

44

Att

orn

ey G

ener

al2

--

--

11

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

Aud

ito

r G

ener

al0

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Ban

king

Bo

ard

of

Illi

nois

, S

tate

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1C

arni

val-

Am

usem

ent

Saf

ety

Bo

ard

4-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

4C

entr

al M

anag

emen

t S

ervi

ces,

Dep

t. o

f [

2]

11

04

37

35

65

42

64

71

45

--

--

17

6C

hief

Pro

cure

men

t O

ffic

er--

Gen

eral

Ser

vice

s0

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

-1

Co

mm

erce

& E

cono

mic

Op

po

rtun

ity

[15

][2

3][

26

]3

84

21

21

63

-2

11

1-

3-

--

1-

66

Co

mm

erce

Co

mm

issi

on

48

85

12

11

--

2-

3-

-2

1-

53

-8

2C

om

mun

ity

Co

lleg

e B

oar

d4

-1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-5

Co

mp

tro

ller

61

-1

--

--

--

-1

2-

--

--

--

11

Co

rrec

tio

ns,

Dep

artm

ent

of

63

--

--

11

-1

--

--

--

--

--

-6

6C

PA

Bo

ard

of

Exa

min

ers

0-

--

-1

--

1-

--

--

--

--

--

2C

rim

inal

Jus

tice

Inf

orm

atio

n A

utho

rity

81

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

9D

ange

rous

Dru

gs A

dvi

sory

Co

unci

l1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Div

ersi

fyin

g H

i E

d F

acul

ty i

n IL

Pro

gram

Bo

ard

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1D

ry C

lean

ers

Em

erge

ncy

Res

po

nse

Tru

st F

und

0

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2E

duc

atio

n, S

tate

Bo

ard

of

42

22

-1

33

41

44

3-

2-

13

-4

-7

9E

duc

atio

nal

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns B

oar

d8

--

--

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

0E

leva

tor

Saf

ety

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

0-

--

--

-1

--

--

--

--

--

--

1E

mer

genc

y M

anag

emen

t A

genc

y [3

][2

5]

21

-2

2-

--

--

--

-1

--

--

--

-2

6E

mp

loym

ent

Sec

urit

y, D

epar

tmen

t o

f2

01

1-

--

2-

1-

-2

15

12

--

--

36

Env

iro

nmen

tal

Pro

tect

ion

Age

ncy

24

--

--

--

--

-5

3-

--

--

--

-3

2E

xecu

tive

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on

[33

]0

--

--

-2

--

--

-2

--

--

--

-4

Exp

erim

enta

l O

rgan

Tra

nsp

lant

atio

n P

roce

d.

Bd

.1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Fin

ance

Aut

hori

ty1

8-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

18

Fir

e M

arsh

al1

6-

--

2-

-2

-1

1-

--

1-

--

--

23

Gam

ing

Bo

ard

4-

-1

11

1-

--

11

13

11

--

1-

17

Go

vern

or

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1G

reen

Go

vern

men

t C

oo

rdin

atin

g C

oun

cil

0-

--

--

--

-2

2-

--

--

--

--

4G

uard

ians

hip

and

Ad

voca

cy C

om

mis

sio

n1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Hea

lth

Co

ord

inat

ing

Co

unci

l, S

tate

wid

e6

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-6

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

and

Ser

vice

s R

evie

w B

oar

d [

35

]9

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-9

Hig

her

Ed

ucat

ion

CP

O2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Hig

her

Ed

ucat

ion

Lo

an A

utho

rity

, In

dep

end

ent

1-

--

--

--

--

1-

--

--

--

--

2H

uman

Rig

hts

Co

mm

issi

on

[17

]2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

HIS

TO

RY

OF

EM

ER

GE

NC

Y R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978

TH

RO

UG

H 2

018

69

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

To

tal

Hum

an R

ight

s, D

epar

tmen

t o

f3

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-3

Ind

epen

den

t T

ax T

rib

unal

[3

7]

0-

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

1In

sura

nce,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[28

][3

4]

29

3-

2-

--

--

--

1-

--

--

--

-3

5In

vest

men

t, I

llin

ois

Sta

te B

oar

d o

f2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns B

oar

d8

--

-2

2-

--

--

--

-2

-1

--

-1

5L

abo

r, D

epar

tmen

t o

f1

61

--

-3

1-

-1

21

11

--

--

--

27

Leg

isla

tive

Inf

orm

atio

n S

yste

m4

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

Lie

uten

ant

Go

vern

or

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1L

iquo

r C

ont

rol

Co

mm

issi

on

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1-

--

2L

ott

ery

[27

]0

--

--

--

--

--

--

1-

--

--

-1

Med

ical

Dis

tric

t C

om

mis

sio

n [3

6]

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1M

ilit

ary

Aff

airs

, D

epar

tmen

t o

f [2

4]

0-

--

11

--

--

11

--

--

--

2-

6M

oto

r V

ehic

le T

heft

Pre

vent

ion

Co

unci

l2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Nat

ural

Res

our

ces,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[10

]1

44

15

41

24

14

1-

21

13

21

1-

-1

78

Ob

sole

te B

oar

ds

& C

om

mis

sio

ns9

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-9

Po

llut

ion

Co

ntro

l B

oar

d2

6-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

26

Pri

sone

r R

evie

w B

oar

d2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Pro

cure

men

t P

oli

cy B

oar

d0

--

--

--

--

--

-2

--

--

--

-2

Pur

chas

ed C

are

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

[2

8]

6-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

6R

acin

g B

oar

d3

9-

-3

12

31

32

14

63

11

61

--

77

Ret

irem

ent

Sys

tem

, S

tate

Uni

vers

itie

s 1

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

1-

1-

-4

Ret

irem

ent

Sys

tem

, T

each

ers'

7-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

7S

ex O

ffen

der

Man

agem

ent

Bo

ard

0-

--

-2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2S

pec

iali

zed

Car

e fo

r C

hild

ren,

Div

isio

n o

f0

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Sta

te M

and

ates

Bo

ard

of

Rev

iew

2-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

2S

tate

Po

lice

Mer

it B

oar

d [

8]

91

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

10

Sta

te P

oli

ce,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[14

]7

-3

2-

--

11

--

1-

11

2-

6-

-2

5T

oll

Hig

hway

Aut

hori

ty,

Illi

nois

Sta

te0

2-

11

2-

--

--

--

--

1-

--

-7

Tra

vel

Co

ntro

l B

oar

d,

Leg

isla

tive

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1T

rave

l R

egul

atio

n C

oun

cil

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1T

reas

urer

23

1-

-1

2-

--

--

1-

--

--

--

10

HIS

TO

RY

OF

EM

ER

GE

NC

Y R

UL

EM

AK

ING

BY

AG

EN

CY

1978

TH

RO

UG

H 2

018

70

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

To

tal

Uni

vers

ity

of

Illi

nois

, B

oar

d o

f T

rust

ees

91

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

10

Vet

eran

s' A

ffai

rs,

Dep

artm

ent

of

2-

--

--

--

--

1-

--

--

--

--

3W

ork

ers'

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n C

om

mis

sio

n [3

2]

15

--

--

--

1-

--

1-

--

--

--

-1

7T

his

tab

le i

llu

stra

tes

the

nu

mb

er o

f ru

lem

akin

gs

com

men

ced

by

eac

h a

gen

cy d

uri

ng

th

e ca

len

dar

yea

r.

[1]

DA

SA

, o

nce

a d

ivis

ion

of

Dan

gero

us

Dru

gs C

om

mis

sio

n,

bec

ame

a se

par

ate

agen

cy i

n 1

98

4.

[2

] T

he

Dep

ts. o

f P

erso

nn

el a

nd

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e S

ervi

ces

wer

e co

mb

ined

in

19

82

an

d t

he

nam

e w

as c

han

ged

to

Dep

t. o

f C

entr

al M

anag

emen

t S

ervi

ces.

[3

] In

clu

des

Em

erge

ncy

Ser

vice

s &

Dis

aste

rA

gen

cy,

wh

ich

was

ren

amed

IE

MA

in

19

92

. [4

] In

clu

des

Sta

te's

Att

orn

eys

Ap

pel

late

Ser

vice

Co

mm

issi

on

. [5

] T

he

Mil

itar

y &

Nav

al D

epar

tmen

t b

ecam

e th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f M

ilit

ary

Aff

airs

in

19

88

. [6

] T

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Reg

istr

atio

n &

Ed

uca

tio

n b

ecam

e D

PR

in

19

88

. [7

] C

om

mis

sio

ner

of

Sav

ings

& L

oan

Ass

oci

atio

ns

bec

ame

the

Co

mm

issi

on

er o

f S

avin

gs &

Res

iden

tial

F

inan

ce i

n 1

99

0 a

nd

co

mb

ined

wit

h t

he

Co

mm

issi

on

er o

f B

anks

an

d T

rust

s to

bec

om

e th

e C

om

mis

sio

ner

of

Ban

ks a

nd

Rea

l E

stat

e in

19

96

. Th

e n

ew o

ffic

e al

so a

bso

rbed

th

e re

al e

stat

e li

cen

sin

g fu

nct

ion

s o

f D

PR

. [8

] U

nti

l 1

98

6, t

he

Dep

t. o

f L

aw E

nfo

rcem

ent

Mer

it B

oar

d.

[9]

Th

e S

tate

Sch

ola

rsh

ip C

om

mis

sio

n b

ecam

e IS

AC

in

19

89

. [1

0]

In 1

99

5, D

OC

, E

NR

(p

revi

ou

sly,

In

stit

ute

of

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es),

M&

M, A

ML

RC

, an

d D

OT

Wat

erw

ays

Div

isio

n w

ere

mer

ged

in

to th

eD

epar

tmen

t o

f N

atu

ral

Res

ou

rces

. [1

1]

July

19

97

, DH

S w

as f

orm

ed f

rom

DA

SA

, D

OR

S,

DM

HD

D,

and

sp

ecif

ic p

rogr

ams

fro

m D

PA

an

d D

PH

. [1

2]

In 1

99

6, t

he

Sav

ings

an

d L

oan

Ad

viso

ry B

oar

d b

ecam

e th

e B

oar

d o

f S

avin

gs I

nst

itu

tio

ns.

[1

3]

In 1

99

6, t

he

Bo

ard

s o

f R

egen

ts/G

ove

rno

rs w

ere

dis

ban

ded

in

fav

or

of i

nd

ivid

ual

bo

ard

s o

f tr

ust

ees.

[1

4]

Pri

or

to 1

98

5, D

epar

tmen

t o

f L

aw E

nfo

rcem

ent.

[1

5]

Pri

or

to 1

97

9, D

epar

tmen

t o

f L

oca

l G

ove

rnm

ent

Aff

airs

. [1

6]

Incl

ud

es S

tate

Fai

r A

gen

cy (

pri

or

to 1

97

9).

[1

7]

Ab

sorb

ed F

air

Em

plo

ymen

t P

ract

ices

Co

mm

issi

on

in

19

80

. [1

8]

HC

CC

ab

sorb

ed H

ealt

h F

inan

ce A

uth

ori

ty (

19

79

-82

) d

uti

es i

n 1

98

4.

HC

CC

was

ab

oli

shed

in

20

02

an

d i

ts

du

ties

tak

en b

y D

PH

. [2

2]

In 2

00

0, t

he

Lo

cal

Lab

or

Rel

atio

ns

and

Sta

te L

abo

r R

elat

ion

s B

oar

ds

wer

e co

mb

ined

in

to t

he

Illi

no

isL

abo

r R

elat

ion

s B

oar

d. [

23

] I

n 2

00

3,

DC

CA

bec

ame

DC

EO

. [2

4]

Th

e M

ilit

ary

& N

aval

Dep

artm

ent

bec

ame

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Mil

itar

y A

ffai

rs i

n 1

98

8. [

25

] In

20

03

, DN

S w

asab

sorb

ed b

y IE

MA

. [2

6]

In

20

03

, Pra

irie

Sta

te 2

00

0 A

uth

. was

tra

nsf

erre

d t

o D

CE

O.

[27

] In

20

03

, Dep

artm

ent

of

the

Lo

tter

y w

as t

ran

sfer

red

to

Rev

enu

e. I

n 2

01

1, P

A 9

7-4

64

ch

ange

d t

he

Lo

tter

y b

ack

to a

n i

nd

epen

den

t age

ncy

. [2

8]

Th

e G

ove

rno

r's

Pu

rch

ased

Car

e R

evie

w B

oar

d b

ecam

e th

e P

urc

has

ed C

are

Rev

iew

Bo

ard

wh

en i

tm

ove

d i

nto

SB

E i

n 1

99

6. [

28

] In

2

00

4, t

he

Dep

artm

ents

of

Insu

ran

ce, P

rofe

ssio

nal

Reg

ula

tio

n a

nd

Fin

anci

al I

nst

itu

tio

ns

and

th

e O

ffic

e o

f B

anks

an

d R

eal

Est

ate

wer

e co

mb

ined

in

to t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Fin

anci

al a

nd

Pro

fess

ion

al R

egu

lati

on

. [2

9]

Illi

no

is B

uil

din

g C

om

mis

sio

n w

as a

bso

rbed

by

the

Cap

ital

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Bo

ard

7/1

/04

. [3

0]

Th

e Il

lin

ois

Fin

ance

Au

tho

rity

ab

sorb

ed I

llin

ois

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Fin

ance

Au

tho

rity

, E

xpo

rt D

evel

op

men

t A

uth

ori

ty,

Illi

no

is F

arm

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Au

tho

rity

, Il

lin

ois

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

Au

tho

rity

, Il

lin

ois

R

esea

rch

Par

k A

uth

ori

ty,

Illi

no

is R

ura

l B

on

d B

ank,

Ill

ino

is E

du

cati

on

al F

acil

itie

s A

uth

ori

ty a

nd

th

e Il

lin

ois

Co

mm

un

ity

Dev

elo

pm

ent

Fin

ance

Co

rpo

rati

on

1/1

/04

. [3

1]

7/1

/05

, th

e n

ame

of

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Pu

bli

c A

id w

as c

han

ged

to

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f H

ealt

hca

re a

nd

Fam

ily

Ser

vice

s. [

32

] O

n 1

/1/0

5, th

e n

ame

of

the

Illi

no

is I

nd

ust

rial

C

om

mis

sio

n w

as c

han

ged

to

th

e Il

lin

ois

Wo

rker

s' C

om

pen

sati

on

Co

mm

issi

on

. [3

3]

On

1/1

/99

, PA

90

-73

7 r

epea

led

th

e G

ove

rno

r's

Eth

ics

Co

mm

issi

on

an

d r

epla

ced

it

wit

h

the

Exe

cuti

ve E

thic

s C

om

mis

sio

n.

[34

] O

n 4

/1/0

9 D

FP

R's

Div

isio

n o

f In

sura

nce

was

re-

esta

bli

shed

as

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Insu

ran

ce (

par

t o

f D

FP

R f

rom

20

03

-20

09).

[3

5]

On

6/3

0/0

9 th

e n

ame

of

the

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

Pla

nn

ing

Bo

ard

was

ch

ange

d t

o t

he

Hea

lth

Fac

ilit

ies

and

Ser

vice

s R

evie

w B

oar

d. [

36

]F

orm

erly

, M

edic

al C

ente

r C

om

mis

sio

n.

[37

] P

A 9

7-1

12

9 c

reat

ed t

he

Illi

no

is I

nd

epen

den

t Tax

Tri

bu

nal

in

20

12

.

HIS

TO

RY

OF

PE

RE

MP

TO

RY

/EX

EM

PT

RU

LE

MA

KIN

G B

Y A

GE

NC

Y

1978

TH

RO

UG

H 2

018

71

AG

EN

CY

78

-99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

To

tal

Agi

ng,

Dep

artm

ent

on

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1A

gric

ultu

re,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[16

]8

85

32

44

42

32

3-

32

23

-1

--

13

1C

entr

al M

anag

emen

t S

ervi

ces,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[2

]6

46

32

11

01

31

38

10

13

15

99

10

93

39

12

11

Chi

ldre

n &

Fam

ily

Ser

vice

s, D

epar

tmen

t o

f2

--

--

-2

--

--

--

--

--

--

-4

Co

mm

erce

Co

mm

issi

on

3-

--

--

--

--

--

--

1-

--

--

4C

om

ptr

oll

er1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Co

rrec

tio

ns,

Dep

artm

ent

of

16

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

6E

duc

atio

n, S

tate

Bo

ard

of

11

2-

--

--

--

--

-3

--

--

--

-1

6

Em

erge

ncy

Man

agem

ent

Age

ncy

0-

--

--

--

-2

15

1-

1-

23

-2

17

Em

plo

ymen

t S

ecur

ity,

Dep

artm

ent

of

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1H

ealt

hcar

e an

d F

amil

y S

ervi

ces,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[13

]9

0-

--

--

--

-3

1-

--

--

--

--

94

Dep

artm

ent

of

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

[11

][1

]2

--

11

12

21

63

12

12

23

12

13

4L

abo

r, D

epar

tmen

t o

f 1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Nat

ural

Res

our

ces,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[10

]2

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-2

Nat

ure

Pre

serv

es C

om

mis

sio

n1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

Po

llut

ion

Co

ntro

l B

oar

d2

67

24

13

14

11

10

18

25

22

08

81

61

01

31

02

12

33

05

16

Pub

lic

Hea

lth,

Dep

artm

ent

of

2-

--

--

--

--

--

-1

--

--

-3

Ret

irem

ent

Sys

tem

, S

tate

Em

plo

yees

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1R

even

ue,

Dep

artm

ent

of

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1T

rans

po

rtat

ion,

Dep

artm

ent

of

[10

]2

--

--

45

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

1T

rave

l R

egul

atio

n C

oun

cil

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1T

reas

urer

1-

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

1O

bso

lete

Bo

ard

s &

Co

mm

issi

ons

1

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

-1

TO

TA

LS

55

93

71

91

91

72

94

44

21

44

32

92

93

42

23

02

41

02

01

43

41

,06

9T

his

ta

ble

ill

ust

rate

s th

e n

um

ber

of

rule

ma

kin

gs

com

men

ced

by

ea

ch a

gen

cy d

uri

ng

th

e ca

len

da

r y

ear.

[1]

DA

SA

, o

nce

a d

ivis

ion

of

Dan

gero

us

Dru

gs C

om

mis

sio

n,

bec

ame

a se

par

ate

agen

cy i

n 1

98

4.

[2

] T

he

Dep

ts. o

f P

erso

nn

el a

nd

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e S

ervi

ces

wer

e co

mb

ined

in

19

82

an

d t

he

nam

e w

as c

han

ged

to

Dep

t. o

f C

entr

al M

anag

emen

t S

ervi

ces.

[3

] In

clu

des

Em

erge

ncy

Ser

vice

s &

Dis

aste

r A

gen

cy,

wh

ich

was

ren

amed

IE

MA

in

19

92

. [4

] In

clu

des

ru

les

of

the

Inst

itu

te o

f N

atu

ral

Res

ou

rces

, w

hic

h p

red

ated

th

e D

epar

tmen

t.

[5]

Th

e M

ilit

ary

& N

aval

Dep

artm

ent

bec

ame

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Mil

itar

y A

ffai

rs i

n 1

98

8.

[6]

Th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f R

egis

trat

ion

& E

du

cati

on

bec

ame

DP

R i

n 1

98

8.

[7]

Co

mm

issi

on

er o

f S

avin

gs &

Lo

an A

sso

ciat

ion

s b

ecam

e th

e C

om

mis

sio

ner

of

Sav

ings

& R

esid

enti

al F

inan

ce i

n

19

90

. [8

] U

nti

l 1

98

6, t

he

Dep

t. o

f L

aw E

nfo

rcem

ent

Mer

it B

oar

d.

[9]

Th

e S

tate

Sch

ola

rsh

ip C

om

mis

sio

n b

ecam

e IS

AC

in

19

89

.[1

0]

In 1

99

5, D

OC

, M

&M

, AM

LR

C,

and

DO

T

Wat

erw

ays

Div

isio

n w

ere

mer

ged

in

to t

he

Dep

artm

ent

of

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es.

[11

] Ju

ly 1

99

7, D

HS

was

fo

rmed

fro

m D

AS

A,

DO

RS

, DM

HD

D,

and

sp

ecif

ic p

rogr

ams

fro

m D

PA

an

d D

PH

. [1

2]

In 1

99

6, t

he

Sav

ings

an

d L

oan

Ad

viso

ry B

oar

d b

ecam

e th

e B

oar

d o

f S

avin

gs I

nst

itu

tio

ns.

[1

3]

7/1

/05

, th

e n

ame

of

the

Dep

artm

ent

of

Pu

bli

c A

id w

as c

han

ged

to

th

e D

epar

tmen

t o

f H

ealt

hca

re a

nd

Fam

ily

Ser

vice

s.

Assisted by Kevin Kulavic Vicki Thomas Crystal Woolardilga.gov/commission/jcar/JCAR 2018 Annual Report... · Kevin Kulavic Vicki Thomas Crystal Woolard. 2018 ANNUAL REPORT of the

Documents