APPENDIX A3.2-1 BASELINE DATA – EELGRASS The baseline data that was collected is summarized as follows: A3.2-1a Eelgrass Habitat Mapping and Distribution………………………..i A3.2-1b Detailed Habitat Mapping & Leaf Area Indices……..………..….iii A3.2-1c Seasonal Baseline Data…………..………………………………..iv
93
Embed
APPENDIX A3.2-1 BASELINE DATA – EELGRASS...Appendix A3.2-1. Baseline data – Eelgrass iv A3.2-1c. Seasonal Baseline Data The following table summarizes the results of the seasonal
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
APPENDIX A3.2-1
BASELINE DATA – EELGRASS
The baseline data that was collected is summarized as follows:
A3.2-1a Eelgrass Habitat Mapping and Distribution………………………..i A3.2-1b Detailed Habitat Mapping & Leaf Area Indices……..………..….iii A3.2-1c Seasonal Baseline Data…………..………………………………..iv
Appendix A3.2-1. Baseline data – Eelgrass i
A3.2-1a. Eelgrass Habitat Mapping and Distribution The data provided in the following table was collected in July and August 2003. Polygon numbers are listed in the first column. Zostera marina is checked under the heading Species Composition when the density equalled or exceeded 1 shoot per metre squared. Z. japonica is checked whenever the cover by this species exceeded 1%. An * is used to note presence of either species below these limits. The distribution of a species was considered continuous in cases where that species was distributed throughout the polygon, and patchy when the plants were confined to islands surrounded by either bare substrate or the other eelgrass species. The abundance of Z. japonica was classified as; present <1%, sparse <40%, moderate 41-75%, or dense >75%.
Species Composition Z. marina Z. japonica Distribution
A3.2-1b. Detailed Habitat Mapping & Leaf Area Indices (LAI) The data provided in the following table was collected during August 2003, with the exception of the Coverage values marked with a * ; these were determined via transect sampling in July 2004.
A3.2-1c. Seasonal Baseline Data The following table summarizes the results of the seasonal baseline data study. Each value represents the mean of twenty (20) replicate 0.25m2 quadrats. Sites WR1, WR2, and WR3 are located in Boundary Bay, White Rock. The sites may be classified by relative elevation as follows: High Elevation Sites: 5, WR1 Mid Elevation Sites: 1, 2, 3, WR2 Low Elevation Sites: 4, 6, WR3
Appendix A3.2-2. Biophysical transect data for Terminal 2 Project i
Biophysical transect information for Terminal 2 Project collected June 3, 2004
Vertical elevation/depth given in metres relative to chart datum. Invertebrates: A = Abundant, C = Common, P = Present. Vegetation: % cover estimated for dominant vegetation.
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review i
Invertebrates reported by studies in the immediate Roberts Bank area, including the Tsawwassen salt marh. Numbers refer to study, shown at the bottom. No effort was made to authenticate species reports nor to actualize species names.
Habitats: E - eelgrass, S - salt marsh, M - mudflat, R – rip rap/boulders, N/A - species could not be assigned to any habitat. Habitat/ Reference
Phylum Taxon Latin Name Common Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-a 7-b 8 9 10 11 12
Ciliata Protozoan Ciliates M M
Foraminifera Protozoan Foraminiferans M M
Rotifera Protozoan Rotifers M M Porifera Porifera Leucon sp. Yellow sponge S Cnidaria Anthozoan Metridium senile Plumose anemone R
Cnidaria Anthozoan Edwardsiidae S
Cnidaria Anthozoan Tealia sp. Sea anemone R/M
Cnidaria Anthozoan Ptilosarcus gurneyi Sea pen M
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Coryne sp. Hydroid N/A
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Hydroids sp. M M
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Muggiaea sp. N/A
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Phialidium sp. N/A
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Proboscidactyla sp. N/A
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Rathkea sp. N/A
Cnidaria Hydrozoan Tubularia sp. N/A
Cnidaria Scyphozoan Medusae M N/A
Ctenophora Ctenophore Pleurobrachia sp. N/A
Nematoda Nematode M M E Nemertea Nemertean Nemerteans,
unidentified Ribbon worm M M M/
E Nemertea Nemertean Cerebratulus sp. Ribbon worm S
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review ii
Habitat/ Reference
Phylum Taxon Latin Name Common Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-a 7-b 8 9 10 11 12
Nemertea Nemertean Enopla sp. Ribbon worm S Nemertea Nemertean Paranemertes peregrina Ribbon worm N/A Nemertea Nemertean Tubulanus sp. Ribbon worm S M
Platyhelminthes Flatworm Turbellarians flatworm M M Sipunculida Sipunculidae peanut worm M
Annelida Oligochaeta Oligochaeta indetermined
S
Annelida Oligochaeta Tubificidae S
Annelida Polychaeta Polychaeta unidentified S M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Sedentariae Tube worms R M
Annelida Polychaeta Errantiae M
Annelida Polychaeta Abarenicola sp. Lug worm E
Annelida Polychaeta Amphicteis juv. N/A
Annelida Polychaeta Amphicteis sp. M
Annelida Polychaeta Aphelochaeta sp. S
Annelida Polychaeta Armandia sp. N/A N/A
Annelida Polychaeta Capitella capitata complex
S M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Cirratulidae M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Cossura sp. S
Annelida Polychaeta Dorvilleidae M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Eteone longa M
Annelida Polychaeta Eteone sp. N/A S
Annelida Polychaeta Eulalia sp. M
Annelida Polychaeta Eunicidae Rock worm E
Annelida Polychaeta Glycera sp. Blood worm E M
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review iii
Habitat/ Reference
Phylum Taxon Latin Name Common Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-a 7-b 8 9 10 11 12
Annelida Polychaeta Glycinde sp. N/A M
Annelida Polychaeta Goniadidae M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Heteromastus sp. M
Annelida Polychaeta Hobsonia florida S
Annelida Polychaeta Maldanidae Bamboo worm E M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Manayunkia aestaurina M
Annelida Polychaeta Manayunkia sp. N/A
Annelida Polychaeta Monticellina sp. S
Annelida Polychaeta Nephtys sp. M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Nereis sp. Ragworm E N/A N/A S M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Nereis limnicola M
Annelida Polychaeta Orbiniidae Polychaete E M
Annelida Polychaeta Oweniidae Sand worms E M/E
Annelida Polychaeta Paraonis sp. N/A M
Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodocidae M
Annelida Polychaeta Polydora ligni S
Annelida Polychaeta Polydora sp. M
Annelida Polychaeta Pseudopolydora kempi S
Annelida Polychaeta Pygospio sp. N/A
Annelida Polychaeta Pygospio elegans S M
Annelida Polychaeta Questidae M
Annelida Polychaeta Sabellidae Fanworm E M
Annelida Polychaeta Scalibregmidae Polychaete E M
Annelida Polychaeta Spionidae Polychaete E S M/E
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review iv
Habitat/ Reference
Phylum Taxon Latin Name Common Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7-a 7-b 8 9 10 11 12
Annelida Polychaeta Sternaspis scutata E
Annelida Polychaeta Syllidae sp. S
Mollusca Bivalvia Bivalves M M M/E
Mollusca Bivalvia Clinocardium nuttallii Cockle E M, R
M/E
Mollusca Bivalvia Crassostrea gigas Japanese oyster R
Mollusca Bivalvia Cryptomya californica Clam S
Mollusca Bivalvia Diplodonta sp. Diplodont clam E
Mollusca Bivalvia Hinnites multirugosus Rock scallop R
Mollusca Bivalvia Lucinidae Lucine clam E
Mollusca Bivalvia Macoma sp. Clam N/A M/E
Mollusca Bivalvia Macoma balthica Baltic macoma E M M/E Mollusca Bivalvia Macoma nasuta Bent-nose macoma E S M/E
Mollusca Bivalvia Modiolus sp. Mussel E
Mollusca Bivalvia Musculus sp. Clam N/A
Mollusca Bivalvia Mya arenaria Clam M M/E
Mollusca Bivalvia Mytilus sp. Mussel R E
Mollusca Bivalvia Mytilus edulis Blue Mussel R E N/A S M
Mollusca Bivalvia Nutricola sp. Dwarf-venus clam E
Mollusca Bivalvia Nuttallia obscurata Purple varnish clam E M
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review xi
References 1 - Gartner Lee Limited. 1992. Environmental Appraisal of Proposed Container Terminal, Roberts Bank. Report prepared for Vancouver Port Corporation. August 1992.
2 - Jacques Whitford Environmental Ltd. 2001. Roberts Bank cumulative environmental effects study: marine study. Report prepared for Vancouver Port Authority. December 2001.
3 - Levings, C.D. and J.B. Coustalin. 1975. Zonation of Intertidal Biomass and Related Benthic Data from Sturgeon and Roberts Banks Fraser River Estuary, B.C. Fisheries and Marine Services Technical Report No. 468, Environment Canada, Vancouver, B.C.
4 - Archipelago Marine Research Ltd. 1993. Marine Environmental Review of the Proposed Grain Terminal at Roberts Bank. Report prepared for RSMI. February 1993.
5 - Miller, P. and L. Hensel. 1982. Roberts Bank Development: a report on habitat compensation. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Vancouver, B.C. 6 - IRC Integrated Resource Consultants Inc. 1997. Environmental monitoring study of the Tsawwassen salt marsh. Report prepared for the Tsawwassen First Nation.
7 (a & b) - Bravender, B.A., C.D. Levings, and T.J. Brown. 1993. A comparison of meiofauna available as fish food on Sturgeon and Roberts Bank, Fraser River estuary, British Columbia. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1904. 40 p. [7 - a is core sampling and 7 - b is sled sampling].
8 - Levings, C.D., R. Armour, and N.G. McDaniel. 1978. A trench through mudflat communities of macroinvertebrates on Roberts Bank, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia. Fisheries and Marine Service. MS Rep. No. 1501: 51 p.
9 – Levings, C.D. 1980. Vertical distribution and abundance of epibenthos and macro-zooplankton in the lower Fraser estuary. Can. Data Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 241: 59 p.
10 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 1993. Juvenile Dungeness population assessment. Report prepared for Department of Fisheries and Oceans. October 1993.
11 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 1994. Juvenile Dungeness monitoring. Report for Department of Fisheries and Oceans. January 1994. 12 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 2003-2004. Roberts Banks Container expansion study. Current study.
Appendix A3.3-2a. Invertebrate literature review xii
Algae Found Near Roberts Bank
Habitat Location Frequency
Phylum Latin Name Common Name 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Laminaria saccharina Sugar kelp R N/A C Nereocystis leutkeana Bull kelp R R/M N/A S C C/R Rhodymenia pertusa Red Algae R N/A C Ulva sp. Sea Lettuce R E R N/A N/A I/O S S/I C N/A C N/A Gigartina sp. Turkish towel algae R N/A C Corallina sp. Coralline algae R R N/A S U C Vaucheria sp. Algal mat E I/O N/A Enteromorpha sp. Sea Hair E I/O N/A Kornmannia leptoderma Green epiphytic alga E I/O N/A Lola lubrica Green filamentous alga E I/O N/A Fucus sp. Brown algae R S C Agarum fimbriatum Brown algae R/M S R Alaria marginata Brown algae R S R Zostera marina Eelgrass R S R
APPENDIX A3.3-2b
RED AND BLUE LISTED MARINE SPECIES POTENTIALLY PRESENT IN THE ROBERTS BANK AREA
Appendix A3.3-2b. Red and blue listed species i
B.C. Conservation Data Centre Status Ranking S – Provincial 1 - critically imperiled G – Global 2 - imperiled Q – Taxonomic status 3 - vulnerable to extirpation or extinction H – Historical 4 - apparently secure N – Non-breeding occurrence 5 - demonstrably widespread, abundant, and secure ? - unranked - Global Rank not yet assessed
Taxon Genus Species Global rank
Provincial rank
Provincial listing
Marine alga Antithamnion kylinii G3G4 S2 Red Marine alga Arthrocardia silvae G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Ascocyclus orbicularis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Bonnemaisonia geniculata G3 S1 Red Marine alga Callolax globosis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Chiharaea bodegensis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Codium ritteri G3G5 S1 Red Marine alga Cylindrocarpus rugosus G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Desmarestia tortuosa G1? S1 Red Marine alga Dictyoneuropsis reticulata G4 S2 Red Marine alga Dictyoneurum californicum G4G5 S2 Red Marine alga Empselium rubrum G1? S1 Red Marine alga Endophyton ramosum G3 S1 Red Marine alga Erythroglossum intermedium G1? S1 Red Marine alga Eugomontia sacculata G3 S1 Red Marine alga Gracilariophila oryzoides G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Herposiphonia verticillata G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Hollenbergia nigricans G3 S1 Red Marine alga Laminaria farlowii G4G5 S1 Red Marine alga Laminaria longipes G5 S1 Red Marine alga Laminaria sinclairii G4 S2 Red Marine alga Leptonematella fasciculata G5 S1 Red Marine alga Minium parvum G3 S1 Red Marine alga Myriogramme pulchra G2 S1 Red Marine alga Myriogramme spectabilis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Neevea repens G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Ozophora latifolia G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Papenfussiella callitricha G3G4 S1 Red Marine alga Percusaria dawsonii G3 S3 Blue Marine alga Peysonnelia profunda G3 S1 Red Marine alga Phycodris riggii G4 S2 Red Marine alga Polysiphonia macounii G1?Q S1 Red Marine alga Protomonostroma undulatum G4G5 S1 Red Marine alga Pseudopringsheimia apiculata G3 S1 Red Marine alga Sphaerotrichia divaricata G4G5 S1 Red Marine alga Stictyosiphon tortilis G5 S1 Red Marine alga Syringoderma phinneyi G1 S1 Red
Appendix A3.3-2b. Red and blue listed species ii
Taxon Genus Species
Global rank
Provincial rank
Provincial listing
Marine alga Tayloriella abyssalis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Tayloriella divaricata G3 S1 Red Marine alga Thuretellopsis peggiana G2 S1 Red Marine alga Tokidadendron kurilensis G4G5 S1 Red Marine alga Tokidaea chilkatensis G3 S1 Red Marine alga Whidbeyella cartilaginea G1 S1 Red Sponge Grantia sp. aff. compressa G? S1 Red Sponge Porfira hexactinelida G? S1 Red Sponge Halichondria sp. aff. fibrosa G? S1 Red Sponge Ploca,issa igzo G? S1 Red Sponge Chelonaplysilla polyraphis G? S1 Red Sponge Psammopemma sp. G? S1 Red Sponge Hymenamphiastra cyanocrypta G? S1 Red Hydroid Corymorpha sp. G? S1 Red Hydrocoral Stylaster? sp. G? S1 Red Coral Isadella sp. G? S1 Red Anemone Synhalcurias sp. G? S1 Red Anemone Corallimorphus sp. G? S3 Blue Flatworm Hoploplana californica G? S1 Red Polychaete Hololepida magna G? S3 Blue Polychaete Sphinter alaskaensis G? S1 Red Polychaete Hediste limnicola G? S1 Red Polychaete Lindaspio southwardorum G? S1 Red Pogonophore Lamellibrachia barhami G? S1 Red Chiton Hanleyella oldroydi G? S2 Red Abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana G? S2 Red Limpet Lepetodrilus corrugatus G? S1 Red Snail Arctomelon stearnsi G? S1 Red Snail Fucaria striata G? S1 Red Nudibranch Anidolyta spongotheras G? S1 Red Nudibranch Cumanotus fernaldi G? S1 Red Nudibranch Flabellina iodinea G? S1 Red Nudibranch Flabellina sp. G? S1 Red Nudibranch Cuthona punicea G? S1 Red Snail Calliostoma bernardi G? S1 Red Snail Calliostoma platinum G? S3 Blue Nudibranch Okenia vancouverensis G? S1 Red Cockle Serripes groenlandicus G? S2 Red Clam Rhamphidonta retifera G? S1 Red Oyster Ostrea conchaphila G? S3 Blue Pycnogonid Sericpsura venticola G? S2 Red Goose barnacle Pollicipes polymerus G? S1 Red Shrimp Lebbeus polaris G? S1 Red Crab Hapalogaster grebnitzkii G? S1 Red
Appendix A3.3-2b. Red and blue listed species iii
Taxon Genus Species
Global rank
Provincial rank
Provincial listing
Crab Emerita longa G? S2N Red Crab Mursia gaudichaudi G? S1? Red Polychaete ?lionix hedgpethi G? S1 Red Lamp shell Discinisca lamellosa G? S1 Red Lamp shell Platidia horni G? S1 Red Crinoid Antenedon sp. aff. petasus G? S1 Red Sand dollar Echinarachnius parma G? SH Red Sea cucumber Pentamera trachyplaca G? S2 Red Sea cucumber Thyonidium kurilensis G? S1 Red Sea star Ceramaster arcticus G? S1 Red Brittle star Ophiopteris papillosa G? S1 Red Brittle star Ophioplocus esmarki G? S1 Red Ascidian Eudistomia purpuropunctatum G? S1 Red Ascidian Megalodicopia hians G? S1 Red Ascidian Pyura sp. cf. lignosa G? S1 Red Ascidian Pyura sp. cf. teselata G? S1 Red Ascidian Ritterella aequalisiphonis G? S1 Red Acorn worm Saccoglossus sp. G? S1 Red
APPENDIX A3.3-3a
LIST OF ALL ANIMALS RECORDED IN THE INTERTIDAL AND SUBTIDAL AREA SURROUNDING DELTAPORT
AUGUST 2003-JUNE 2004. This includes the content of 50 intertidal quadrats analyzed from both sides of the causeway, (August – December, 2003), beam trawls, crab, prawn and minnow traps, beach seines and underwater SIMS surveys.
Table A3.3-3b. Main taxa found in intertidal quadrats, West and East sides of the Roberts Bank causeway, August to December 2003, and their ascribed trophic
Appendix A3.3-5. Preliminary results of intertidal quadrats analyses. Shaded cells in the sample column are samples either totally or partially analyzed, non-shaded cells are samples yet to be analyzed.
Page 1
Sample DateDistance
(m)Z. marina
seeds Siphon holesPolychaetes fecal
casting
Sand Mud Clay ShellZostera marina
Zostera japonica Enteromorpha Ulva Kornmannia Diatom Rhyzome Z. marina Z. japonica Z. marina Z. japonica Enteromorpha Kornmania
Fish reported by studies in either Roberts Bank or in the intercauseway area, including the Tsawwassen salt marsh. Numbers refer to study,shown at the bottom. No effort was made to authenticate species report nor to actualize species names.
Fish SpeciesFamily Common name Species Sp Su F W Sp Su F W Sp Su F W
Seasons:Summer: June 01- August 31Fall: September 01 - November 30Winter: December 01 - February 28Spring: March 01- May 31
9 - Archipelago Marine Research Ltd. 1993. Marine Environmental Review of the Proposed Grain Terminal at Roberts Bank. Report prepared for RSMI. February 1993. 10 - Archibald, D. and R. Bocking. 1983. Annual Report Summarizing 1981 - 82 Activities on Roberts Bank: Crab Habitat Loss and Dredge Monitoring Program. Prepared for National Harbours Board and Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans.11 - Miller, P. and L. Hensel. 1982. Roberts Bank Development: a report on habitat compensation. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Vancouver, B.C. 12 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 2003-2004. Roberts Banks Container expansion study. Current study.
5 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 1994. Juvenile Dungeness monitoring. Report for Department of Fisheries and Oceans. January 1994.6 - IRC Integrated Resource Consultants Inc. 1997. Environmental monitoring study of the Tsawwassen salt marsh. Report prepared for the Tsawwassen First Nation.7 - Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. 1993. Juvenile Dungeness population assessment. Report prepared for Department of Fisheries and Oceans. October 1993.8 - MacDonald, A.L. 1984. Seasonal Use of Nearshore Intertidal Habitats by Juvenile Pacific Salmon on the Delta-Front of the Fraser River Estuary, British Columbia. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Victoria.
1 - Greer, G. L., C. D. Levings, R. Harbo, B. Hillaby, T. Brown and J. Sibert. 1980. Distribution of fish species on Roberts and Sturgeon Banks recorded in seine and trawl surveys. Can. MS Report of Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1596.2 - Gordon, D.K. and C.D. Levings. 1984. Seasonal changes in inshore fish populations on Sturgeon and Roberts Bank, Fraser River estuary, British Columbia. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1240: 81p.3 - Jacques Whitford Environmental Ltd. 2001. Roberts Bank cumulative environmental effects study: marine habitat study. Report prepared for Vancouver Port Authority. December 2001.4 - Levings, C.D., G.L. Greer, and P. Miller. 1983. Results of preliminary mark-capture experiments with juvenile salmonids on Sturgeon and Roberts Bank, Fraser River estuary. Can. MS Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1684: 27 p.
Appendix A3.3-6. Fish literature review 4
APPENDIX A3.3-7
LINGCOD EGG MASS AND ROCKY REEF FISH SURVEY SUMMARY RESULTS
Appendix A3.3-7. Lingcod eggmass and rocky reef fish survey summary results i
Table A3.3-7a. Summary of lingcod egg nesting characteristics from the lingcod egg mass survey (LEMS) February 9-10, 2004. (see Figure 3.2.4-2 for transect locations) Site Nest # Depth
(m-CD) Size
(W,C,G,1) Condition (N,E,R2)
Situation (S,L,O3)
Nest Guarding Male (P,P2,A4)
1 -6.0 G E S A 1 2 -1.0 G E O A 3 -1.4 W N S A 4 -0.6 W N S A 5 -0.6 W N S P 6 -0.4 W N S A 7 -0.9 W N S A 8 -0.7 W N S A 9 -1.8 C N S A
10 -1.0 W N S A
2
11 -1.2 C N S P 12 -0.7 W N S A 3 13 -0.7 W N S A 14 -0.3 W N S A 15 -0.3 W N S P 16 -0.2 C N S A 17 -0.8 W N S A 18 -0.2 W N S A
4
19 -0.4 C R O A 20 +0.2 W N S A 21 -0.1 W N S/O A
5
22 -0.5 W N O P 23 -0.7 C N S P 24 -0.6 W N S A 25 -0.4 W N S P 26 -1.4 C N S A
6
27 -0.3 W N S P 7 N/O5
1 (W)atermelon, ( C )antelope, (G)rapefruit 2 (N)ew (white, pink), (E)yed (dark grey), ( R )otten 3 (S)ecure in crevice, (L)oose, (O)ut in open 4 (P)resent, (P2) male guarding multiple egg masses, (A)bsent 5 none observed
Appendix A3.3-7. Lingcod eggmass and rocky reef fish survey summary results ii
Table A3.3-7b. Rocky reef fish survey summary information, January 13-14, 2004 (see Figure 3.2.4-2 for locations) Transect Location Depth (m relative to
CD) Length (m) /direction
Date
1A Crest protection-intercauseway
+0.2 to +0.5 100/ NW January 14, 2004
1B Crest protection-intercauseway
+0.1 to +0.6 100/ NE January 14, 2004
2A Deltaport Third Berth -17.5 100/ SW January 13, 2004
2B SE Coal Terminal -5.1 to –2.9 100/ SW January 14, 2004
3A Artificial reef (east) -1.0 to -1.0 100/ NW January 13, 2004
3B Artificial reef (west) -2.1 to 0.0 100/ NW January 13, 2004
4A SW Coal terminal 0 to +0.3 100/ NE January 13, 2004
4B SW Coal terminal +1.7 to +1.4 100/SW January 14, 2004
APPENDIX A4.1-1
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE
PROJECT
Appendix A4.1-1. Evaluation criteria for assessing significance i
Residual Impact Assessment Evaluation criteria used for assessing the significance of the adverse environmental impacts of the project: Severity Rating for VECs (excluding marine mammals - partial matrix):
Magnitude Extent Frequency Duration Reversibility Severity Significance High Any Any Any Any High Significant* Moderate Regional or
Local Any Any Reversible
Low or Moderate
Regional, Local or Immediate
Any Any Irreversible
Moderate Non Significant
Moderate Immediate Isolated or Periodic
Short term Reversible
Low Regional, Local or Immediate
Any Any Reversible
Low Non Significant
*Impact significant if proper compensation and/or mitigation measures are not enforced Severity Rating for Marine Mammal VECs (partial matrix):
Magnitude Extent Frequency Duration Reversibility Likelihood Severity Significance High, Moderate or Low
Any Any Any Any High or Moderate
High or Moderate
Significant*
Moderate Regional or Local
Any Any Reversible Low
Low or Moderate
Regional, Local or Immediate
Any Any Irreversible Low
Moderate Non Significant
Moderate Immediate Isolated or Periodic
Short term Reversible Low
Low Regional, Local or Immediate
Any Any Reversible Low
Low Non Significant
*Impact significant if proper compensation and/or mitigation measures are not enforced
Appendix A4.1-1. Evaluation criteria for assessing significance ii
Severity Rating Definitions: Magnitude
High > 10% change in the amount of available habitat. Moderate > 5 – 10% change in the amount of available habitat. Low > 0 - 5% change in the amount of available habitat. Nil No change in fish habitat.
Extent
Provincial Effects extend outside of the regional surroundings, but within provincial setting.
Regional Effects extending outside of project boundary to regional. Local Effects occurring mainly within or in close proximity to the proposed
development area. Immediate Effects limited to the vicinity of the project.
Frequency
Continuous Effects continuous. Periodic Effects intermittent, but repeated. Isolated Effects confined to a specified period.
Duration
Residual Effects persisting indefinitely. Long-term Effects occurring after development of project, but diminishing with time. Short-Term Effects occurring within project development phase.
Reversibility
Irreversible Effects are not reversible and do not diminish with time. Reversible Effects are reversible and diminish with time.
Likelihood (Marine mammals only)
High Impact likely Moderate Possibility of impact Low Impact not likely
APPENDIX A4.5-1
RESIDUAL EFFECTS SUMMARY
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary i
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: eelgrass
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint High Immediate Isolated Long term Irreversible High Yes Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Moderate to Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2.Construction of dykes Moderate to Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Moderate to Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Moderate to Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Moderate to Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Periodic Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary ii
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: salt marsh
Evaluation criteria
Project Component
Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
R
atin
g Mitigation proposed
Significance
Footprint High Immediate Isolated Continuous Irreversible High Yes Non significant
Construction 1. Dredging of berth n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
2.Construction of dykes n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
3. Dredging for terminal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
4. Placement of sands n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
5. Placement of caissons n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary iii
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: foreshore
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
2.Construction of dykes n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
3. Dredging for terminal n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
4. Placement of sands n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
Construction
5. Placement of caissons n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a No n/a
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary iv
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: intertidal mudflat
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint High Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible High Yes Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary v
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: juvenile salmonids
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary vi
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: adult Dungeness crabs
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary vii
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: juvenile Dungeness crabs
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint High Immediate Continuous Long term Irreversible High Yes Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Moderate Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Continuous Long term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary viii
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: subtidal mudflats
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary ix
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: subtidal mudflats – juvenile flatfish rearing area
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate
No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low
No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low
No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low
No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low
No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary x
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: intertidal and subtidal rocky habitats
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xi
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: subtidal hard substrates - lingcod spawning
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
rat
ing
Mitigation proposed
Significance
Footprint Moderate Local Isolated Short term Reversible Moderate No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Moderate Local Isolated Short term Reversible Moderate No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Local Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Local Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Moderate Local Isolated Short term Reversible Moderate No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Local Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Local Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xii
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: subtidal hard substrates - rockfish rearing area
Evaluation criteria
Project Component Project Phase
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Footprint Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
1. Dredging of berth Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
2. Construction of dykes Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
3. Dredging for terminal Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
4. Placement of sands Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Construction
5. Placement of caissons Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Operations Low Immediate Isolated Short term Reversible Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xiii
VEC: Marine mammals Marine mammals will not be affected by the footprint per se, and the effects of construction and operations are best summarized by impact source during these phases. Likelihood was also used as an evaluation criterion for marine mammals, as they are transient animals that may or may not be affected by impacts, depending on their location or presence within the local project area.
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: killer whales - construction
Evaluation criteria
Impact source
Mag
nitu
de
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Lik
elih
ood
Seve
rity
rat
ing
Mitigation proposed
Significance
Noise from operations High Local Periodic Short term Reversible Moderate High Yes Non significant
Contaminants Low Local Periodic Short term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Oil spill Moderate Local Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate Moderate No Non significant
Boat Strikes Low Local Isolated Short term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Effects on prey Low Local Periodic Short term Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xiv
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: killer whales - operations
Evaluation criteria
Impact Source M
agni
tude
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Lik
elih
ood
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Noise from operations Moderate Local Continuous Residual Reversible Moderate Moderate No Non significant
Noise from ships Low Regional Continuous Residual Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Contaminants Low Local Periodic Long term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Oil spill Moderate Regional Isolated Long term Irreversible Moderate Moderate Yes Non significant
Boat Strikes Low Regional Periodic Residual Irreversible Moderate Moderate No Non significant
Effects on prey Low Regional Periodic Residual Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xv
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: baleen whales (includes fin, grey and humpback whales) - construction
Evaluation criteria
Impact Source M
agni
tude
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Lik
elih
ood
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Noise from operations Low Local Periodic Short term Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Contaminants Low Local Periodic Short term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Oil spill Low Local Isolated Short term Irreversible Moderate Moderate Yes Non significant
Boat Strikes Low Local Isolated Short term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Effects on prey Low Local Periodic Short term Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Appendix A4.5-1. Residual effects summary xvi
Residual effects severity and significance assessment: baleen whales – operations
Evaluation criteria
Impact Source M
agni
tude
Ext
ent
Freq
uenc
y
Dur
atio
n
Rev
ersi
bilit
y
Lik
elih
ood
Seve
rity
ra
ting Mitigation
proposed Significance
Noise from operations Low Local Continuous Residual Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Noise from ships Low Regional Continuous Residual Reversible Low Low No Non significant
Contaminants Low Local Periodic Long term Irreversible Low Moderate No Non significant
Oil spill Moderate Regional Isolated Long term Irreversible Moderate Moderate Yes Non significant