Top Banner
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear energy and climate change UNA Conference, London, UK 30 April 2009 R. Alexander Roehrl International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
19
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Alex Roehrl April 2009

IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency

Nuclear energy and climate change

UNA Conference, London, UK 30 April 2009

R. Alexander RoehrlInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

Page 2: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Swine flu� Yesterday at Vienna airport: young couple quarrelling about the use of mask to protect against swine flue� “Masks are effective...” – “Masks do not protect…”� “Vaccination will be ready too late”. Does this mean we should not try to develop them?� “I do not like masks.” – Is it a love-hate issue? � Observations: � Seemingly opposing statements may both be true (e.g., surgical masks vs. FFP3 filters, and different usage)� Science-based risk versus risk perception� Different risk behaviours, preferences, cultures and norms

� “All eggs in one basket?” Diversification is the answer…� Risk management lessons for energy-climate change debate

Page 3: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Risk management

Page 4: Alex Roehrl April 2009

IPCC SRES long-term stabilizationDoubling of primary energy demand from 2005 to 2050: � EneCO2 expected to increase by +55% (2030) +130% (2050)

Green level must be achieved! � reduce -50 to -80% by 2050

Page 5: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Global climate change challenge

Stabilization scenarios:Mitigation efforts over the next two to three decades will largely determine future stabilization levels

Source: IPCC AR4

Page 6: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Double challenge: energy and climate

Page 7: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Nuclear power – a love-hate issue?Olkiluoto, Finland Qinshan NPP in Haiyan, China

WAA Wackersdorf, Germany 1986

Page 8: Alex Roehrl April 2009

IAEA approach� “Every country has the right

to introduce nuclear energy, as well as the responsibility to do it right.” (El Baradei, IAEA)� Brochure:

�Neutral sources�Global perspective�Contents: need, supply, concerns and prospects

� http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/ST/NE/Pess/

Page 9: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Need to consider nuclear power� Global energy and climate challenges� Nuclear power has great potential for GHG emissions

reduction:� It has contributed to avoided GHG emissions for decades� It has the largest and lowest cost GHG reduction potential

(Source: IPCC)� Its mitigation contribution can be significant (Source: IEA)

� Other environmental benefits� Security of supply concerns� Nuclear energy applications beyond the power sector

Page 10: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Nuclear power has contributed to lower GHG emissions for decades

Source: IAEA calculations based on IEA data

Global CO2 emissions from electricity generation AND emissions avoided

Page 11: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Nuclear power uses orders of magnitude less land than other energy chains

Source: ENTERGY Nuclear, GENES4/ANP2003, Kyoto

Page 12: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Challenges and concerns� Supplying nuclear power

� Economics of nuclear power getting favourable� Nuclear investment costs increasing, but financing nuclear power investments is feasible� Construction capacity will expand as needed� Sufficient uranium to fuel increasing nuclear power generation

� Concerns about nuclear power:� Radiation risks are low� Nuclear plant safety keeps improving� Waste management and disposal solutions emerging� Proliferation concerns are being addressed� Public acceptance getting more favourable

Page 13: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Radiation risks are lowPublic radiation exposure for average European individual in 2000

1.2

0.50.4

0.30.4

0.0050.002

0.00020

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 1

1.2

1.4

Radon

Terrestialradiation

Cosmicradiation

Radiation infood

Diagnosticmedicalexams

Atmosphericnuclear test

fall-out

Chernobyl

Nuclearpower

production(excluding

Sources

Radiation exposure in mSv/year

Page 14: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Solid wastes from fuel preparation and plant operation

Compare: roughly 8 million tons CO2 per GWyr/yr for coal power plant!!

Page 15: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Rising expectations for nuclear power?

Countries with operating NPPsCountries with operating NPPs & new NPPs under constructionCountries with operating NPPs but considering phase-out Countries considering a nuclearpower programme

Countries with operating NPPsCountries with operating NPPs & new NPPs under constructionCountries with operating NPPs but considering phase-out Countries considering a nuclearpower programme

Page 16: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Prospects for nuclear power “Rising expectations”

Page 17: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Responsibility to “do it right” -IAEA “milestones” for nuclear power development

1. National position2. Legislative framework3. Nuclear safety4. Regulatory framework5. Human Resource Development6. Safeguards7. Security and physical protection8. Management9. Financing10. Stakeholder involvement11. Emergency planning12. Radiation protection13. Nuclear fuel cycle14. Nuclear waste15. Environmental protection16. Site and supporting facilities17. Industrial involvement18. Procurement19. Electric grid

Page 18: Alex Roehrl April 2009

Conclusion

1. All low carbon technologies need to be considered including nuclear power.

2. Nuclear power is not a panacea, but can be part of the solution.

3. Concerns about nuclear power have been addressed� Rising expectations for nuclear power

especially in developing countries� Responsibility to “do it right”

Page 19: Alex Roehrl April 2009

اه������ �� ���ًا 謝謝

Thank you for your attentionMerci de votre attentionСпасибо за вниманиеGracias por tu atención